HPSCHD-L Archives

Harpsichords and Related Topics

HPSCHD-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Varda Ullman Novick <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Wed, 23 Nov 1994 08:27:48 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On Wed, 23 Nov 1994, robert john utterback wrote:
 
> Doesn't the whole notion of selecting the "proper" temperament for a
> piece written in F# minor defeat one of the most important reasons for
> choosing unequal temperament in the first place, namely, to highlight the
> uniqueness of each tonal center by giving it a particular sonority?  In
> other words, why didn't Bach simply keep the C#-major prelude (WTC I) in
> C major?  Or better yet, why not transpose the C-major prelude up a half
> step?  We know from internal evidence (Barnes, Early Music, 1979) that
> Bach factored the wideness of the major thirds into the compositional
> processes for these pieces.  Is the F#-minor toccata, written earlier in
> Bach's career, an altogether different situation?  I, for one, find
> nothing "musically inappropriate" with a straight Werckmeister tuning for
> this piece, and do not mind the Pythagorean thirds (F#-A#, C#-E#) which
> obtain.  But, then again, understand that I once performed the B-minor
> Wuerttemberg sonata -- in temperament ordinaire!
 
And, what about the "French Overture," which was written in C-Minor,
but published in B-Minor, and is now performed in both?  Isn't there
a difference in the 'feel' of those two keys?  (But, if there is a
different feel to the two keys, and if the story about Bach's allowing
it to be published in B-Minor is correct, didn't Bach care?)
 
Varda

ATOM RSS1 RSS2