HPSCHD-L Archives

Harpsichords and Related Topics

HPSCHD-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:00:32 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (22 lines)
James,

They don't even look superficially the same. The Tyrolean makers Stainer and many of the Klotz family made fiddles that look quite
different from Cremonese, especially iff you see them from the side. Those instruments were highly valued until the big rebuilding. They
didn't respond tomodernization the same way the Cremonese instruments did, and lost favor (ie market value) accordingly.

Herron-Allen, in 'Violin Making as it was and is" a Victorian account well worth reading, recalls an old violinist who retired, selling his
beloved Klotz for 40 pounds. H-A adds "Of course, nobody would pay 40 pounds for a Klotz nowadays."


On Mon, 16 Apr 2001 15:54:06 -0600, James wrote:

>
>So when did it finally coalesce into the modern "standard" violin - or did
>it?  Is that also a misconception?  Are a there really a variety of designs
>out there that just look the same superficially?


Rodney Myrvaagnes                   J36 Gjo/a
Senior Editor           Electronic Products
Geezerhood achieved, April 7

ATOM RSS1 RSS2