>What I realliy find interesting is that the editorial staff of The Diapason
>makes funny faces at Rodgers' flagship model, while gladly taking thier
>advertising money as one of their biggest advertisers.
 
Do we really want advertising companies to be the editors? The Diapason
management are either bravely principled, or stupid. I get lots of
magazines whose content seem to be nothing but info-merials for
their biggest advertisers. On the other hand, I've been told one of the
British Organ Magazines refuses adverts from Toasters, on the basis that
they are not organs (a very expensive choice).
 
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on PIPORG-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity at Albany.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  GET LSVCMMDS.TXT  or see  the  web  page at
http://albany.edu/~piporg-l/lsvcmmds.html .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::