PIPORG-L Archives

Pipe Organs and Related Topics

PIPORG-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"Ken W. List" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Ken W. List
Date:
Mon, 9 Jul 2007 09:39:02 -0400
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (76 lines)
Roy Kersey writes (Fri, 6 Jul 2007 22:40:30 -0500)

". . . I remember the organ as being in that vein, bright and light, but 
not overly shrill.
It seems I remember thinking it was a bit underpowered for the space."


Dear Roy and LIST!

I think that Roy's recollection is a very accurate one.  The organ was 
not especially large,
34 ranks on two manuals and pedal, mechanical playing action, EP stop 
action.  And, a
determining factor in its size was that it was to be restricted to the 
confines of the John Geib
case of 1802.  It was intended to be a gentler kind of sound.
Remember that its immediate predecessor was  Aeolian-Skinner's 768-A of 
58 ranks with
birdhouse-like swell box protruding out of the top of Mr Geib's 
formality, and with much roar
and carrying on.  That organ was moved and reinstalled and messed with 
by Schlicker at the
Chapel of the Intercession, hiding behind Bertram Grover Goodhue's 
immense and totally mute
Austin casework.  The organ even had a 32' skinny Violone (Skinner 
Contra Skinnylone)

That was a rebuild in 1950 of Ernest Skinner's # 768 of 41 ranks 
installed in St. Paul's in 1929.

Now,

It is neither my purpose nor right to embroil myself in any controversy 
over the eventual
disposition of the present Chapel organ.  But two things do occur to me, 
partly from my
sentimental attachment to the instrument (The finishing of that organ 
was my FIRST ever
trip to the Big Apple - what a "Doppel-richtiges Erlebnis" for me) and 
partly from my concerns
for what I consider an historical matter:

a.  I should think that no matter what organ replaces the Schlicker, if 
replacement there must be,
that it MUST allow for the retention of the John Geib/Odell Casework.  
Perhaps only as a broom
closet for the gallery, or a hidey-hole for all those 'puders, but . . .

b. I am confused about this:  If the organ was playable enough to 
provide comforting music to
the injured from the 9/11 Tragedy who were brought to St. Paul's Chapel 
fairly immediately after
the towers collapsed, why has it rather oddly become unplayable (if that 
is what is being said)
when the most dust- and debris-laden time would have been that first 24 
hours?  Was the organ
turned on and pumping air through the innards of the chests et al during 
the collapse? Who can
say for certain?  I could understand great 'surface' dust - but. .. .. 
.. .. ..

I am but a humble retired organbuilder, of simple mind and imagination, 
but I am confused.

And saddened.

Ken in Wooster

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on PIPORG-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity at Albany.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  GET LSVCMMDS.TXT  or see  the  web
page at http://www.albany.edu/piporg-l/lsvcmmds.html .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2