Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:58:09 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
From: Kelzenberg, David C
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:43:54 +0000
> BG was not the best 19th-century edition of Bach's organ works; most people agree that Griepenkerl's Peters Ed. Wins that award, and it remains a fundamentally significant edition today.
No doubt about that. The only main cons about it is the ordering of the works -- Orgelbuchlein combined with outside chorales, Prelude in Eb linked with Fugue in Eb, etc. Peters became aware of this and, at least for the chorales, they output a reclassified edition "in der Folge des Originals". Strangely it seems that this one is much less known than the current Peters Ausgabe.
NG
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on PIPORG-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|