PIPORG-L Archives

Pipe Organs and Related Topics

PIPORG-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Forum View

Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Chanvrelin <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Chanvrelin <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Thu, 31 Jan 2013 21:58:09 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (16 lines)
From: Kelzenberg, David C
Date: Thu, 31 Jan 2013 14:43:54 +0000

> BG was not the best 19th-century edition of Bach's organ works; most people agree that Griepenkerl's Peters Ed. Wins that award, and it remains a fundamentally significant edition today.

No doubt about that.  The only main cons about it is the ordering of the works -- Orgelbuchlein combined with outside chorales, Prelude in Eb linked with Fugue in Eb, etc.  Peters became aware of this and, at least for the chorales, they output a reclassified edition "in der Folge des Originals".  Strangely it seems that this one is much less known than the current Peters Ausgabe.

NG

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on PIPORG-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2