Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 20 Jul 2016 15:40:21 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
> Ray wrote: > Retuning individual notes when changing keys may, indeed,
make things sound better, but do we have any information that this was
actually done at the time? D# and Eb really aren't so different that one
cringes.
It seems quite likely that occasionally musicians retuned all the Eb's into
D#'s, but there is scarcely any evidence from the sources. In some cases
there is actually strong evidence that this was NEVER done: this is the case
in Flemish Transposing Doubles. The point is, the problem mostly arises in
17th c. music, and there were alternative solutions: available:
1) Sometimes the D# is playable with the Eb because either the note does not
make any offending third-sixth-tenth, or if it does it is brief, or else it
is masked by a trill or another dissonance.
2) Sometimes the music was meant for the not-uncommon enharmonic
14-key-per-octave keyboards (we can see quite a few in museums).
3) In some countries modified meantone tunings were described, where
typically only 9 (rather than 11) fifths were meantone fifths, thus
producing different consequences: one of them was that the sharp between D
and E, instead of being perfect as Eb and producing unplayable "wolves" as
D#, was equally bad, but still perfectly "playable" in both cases.
Needless to say, this matter is fully scrutinised in the modern literature.
Best
CDV
http://temper.braybaroque.ie
---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|