HPSCHD-L Archives

Harpsichords and Related Topics

HPSCHD-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Andrew Bernard <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sat, 8 Sep 2018 10:19:27 +1000
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (28 lines)
Hi Chris,

That's not being a party pooper, that's taking a good experimental, though subjective approach. Personally I doubt the result. And a sample size of one is not adequate - so you rightly call for a larger sample.

I would not say the votes are in and that soundholes are favoured. Next people will be wanting to cut holes in Shudi's. 😊

Andrew


-----Original Message-----
From: Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Chris Vandekerkhove
Sent: Saturday, 8 September 2018 3:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: To soundhole or not: an update

I hate to be a party pooper but I used my wife's ears for an experiment:
...
Every time when the soundhole was open she described the sound as more open/brilliant. FYI: she couldn't see what I was doing so she had no clue whether the hole was open or closed.

 Maybe it's all between our 2 ears but currently the favors are in having a soundhole. If you have time/wife/husband/friend and you could repeat my little experiment, I would be most interested to hear about your findings.

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2