Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 8 Sep 2018 10:19:27 +1000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Chris,
That's not being a party pooper, that's taking a good experimental, though subjective approach. Personally I doubt the result. And a sample size of one is not adequate - so you rightly call for a larger sample.
I would not say the votes are in and that soundholes are favoured. Next people will be wanting to cut holes in Shudi's. 😊
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]> On Behalf Of Chris Vandekerkhove
Sent: Saturday, 8 September 2018 3:13 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: To soundhole or not: an update
I hate to be a party pooper but I used my wife's ears for an experiment:
...
Every time when the soundhole was open she described the sound as more open/brilliant. FYI: she couldn't see what I was doing so she had no clue whether the hole was open or closed.
Maybe it's all between our 2 ears but currently the favors are in having a soundhole. If you have time/wife/husband/friend and you could repeat my little experiment, I would be most interested to hear about your findings.
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|