HPSCHD-L Archives

Harpsichords and Related Topics

HPSCHD-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Mon, 22 May 2017 17:38:30 -0700
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (20 lines)
A collegue of mine is rebuilding a double manual instrument (original 
builder will remain anonymous.)  I've heard that sometimes the nut is 
tapered from bass to treble, and this is an extreme case.  Can someone 
explain the theory behind tapering the nut?  It seems to me that this 
serves no purpose.  Of course, there is very good accoustical reason to 
taper the bridge, but the nut?  The only effect I can see is to cause 
problems.  Setting up new jacks must be a nightmare.  The distance from 
the plectrum to the top of the jack will be different for each note 
unless the jack rail is tapered to match.  Key dip would be difficult to 
get consistent, stagger will be hard to get uniform.  All for no 
particular advantage that I can see.  What am I missing?
Norm Purdy

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2