Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 22 May 2017 17:38:30 -0700 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
A collegue of mine is rebuilding a double manual instrument (original
builder will remain anonymous.) I've heard that sometimes the nut is
tapered from bass to treble, and this is an extreme case. Can someone
explain the theory behind tapering the nut? It seems to me that this
serves no purpose. Of course, there is very good accoustical reason to
taper the bridge, but the nut? The only effect I can see is to cause
problems. Setting up new jacks must be a nightmare. The distance from
the plectrum to the top of the jack will be different for each note
unless the jack rail is tapered to match. Key dip would be difficult to
get consistent, stagger will be hard to get uniform. All for no
particular advantage that I can see. What am I missing?
Norm Purdy
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|