Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Tue, 9 Jul 2002 00:40:17 -0400 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Rodney wrote:
>To many of us on the list, the issue is stringing of an antique-scaled
>harpsichord with modern steel wire vs various attempts at wire with
>properties more similar to old samples. That means the steel is not as
>taut as it could be, but since its density is the same as other ferrous
>wire, the Young's modulus is the most palpable difference--literally
>palpable because you can feel the stiffness difference as you pick up
>pieces of wire.
Certainly. My broad objective also. Material stiffness (i.e. Young's
modulus) _is_ critical, but not because of it's influence on inharmonicity,
which is negligible. It's the effect on internal friction and related tonal
effects which I believe to be the important factors that make high carbon
steel sound metallic and historical carbon-free iron sound mellow. We'll see.
>Disclaimer--I have not engaged in research on this matter as Stephen
>has. I am just trying to get clear how far his statement applies to
>earlier and thinner-strung instruments.
All that I said applies to all stringed keyboard instruments, plucked or
struck, thinner or thicker strung. The same iron stringing material problem
applies to all pre-1830 instruments (there is no suitable modern
substitute). After that the problem becomes historical steels, a different
issue that also needs to be resolved. In all of this the effect of Young's
modulus on inharmonicity is irrelevant. Forget about inharmonicity. [John
is correct that I was obviously not including bowed insturments in this
discussion].
Stephen
Stephen Birkett Fortepianos
Authentic Reproductions of 18th and 19th Century Pianos
464 Winchester Drive
Waterloo, Ontario
Canada N2T 1K5
tel: 519-885-2228
mailto: [log in to unmask]
http://real.uwaterloo.ca/~sbirkett
|
|
|