Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 26 Mar 2017 02:43:06 -0500 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 21:52:36 +0100, Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]> wrote:
>Thanks to all for answering me. It seems that the best course to take is this one (thank for the hint Mr. Broekman!):
>
>* Make the basic pitch of the instrument 392 instead of 415 Hz
>* Modify the keyboards so that a transposition 392/415/440 Hz is possible (currently 415/440).
>
>
>
>At first sight it seems just possible to use “historic” stringing materials at this pitch.
etc.
It should be noted that Stephen's wire has a pleasantly high tensile strength as historical wires go. A while ago I restrung an old (1961) Flemish instrument by my father with four register slides, and I had, for example, no trouble with the four foot in the treble where the gap is ridiculously too wide. The strings on there previously were modern steel. P-wire made no problems in the area (more than a semitone of a margin, in fact). Of course, these are the thinnest, relatively most resilient gauges...
I'd suggest you talk to Stephen, send him the scaling, see what he has to say.
Tilman
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|