HPSCHD-L Archives

Harpsichords and Related Topics

HPSCHD-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 26 Mar 2017 02:43:06 -0500
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (25 lines)
On Sat, 25 Mar 2017 21:52:36 +0100, Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

>Thanks to all for answering me. It seems that the best course to take is this one (thank for the hint Mr. Broekman!):
>
>*	Make the basic pitch of the instrument 392 instead of 415 Hz
>*	Modify the keyboards so that a transposition 392/415/440 Hz is possible (currently 415/440).
>
> 
>
>At first sight it seems just possible to use “historic” stringing materials at this pitch. 
etc.

It should be noted that Stephen's wire has a pleasantly high tensile strength as historical wires go. A while ago I restrung an old (1961) Flemish instrument by my father with four register slides, and I had, for example, no trouble with the four foot in the treble where the gap is ridiculously too wide. The strings on there previously were modern steel. P-wire made no problems in the area (more than a semitone of a margin, in fact). Of course, these are the thinnest, relatively most resilient gauges...

I'd suggest you talk to Stephen, send him the scaling, see what he has to say.

Tilman

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2