Hi Michael,

I think you need to take up your argument with the person in question, not the entire mailing list as you seem to be doing here.

Since genius revolves around the semantics of the word, the closest dictionary I have at hand, the Apple Mac dictionary says:

genius |ˈdʒiːnɪəs|
noun (pl.geniuses)

1 [ mass noun ] exceptional intellectual or creative power or other natural ability: she was a teacher of genius | [ in sing. ] : that woman has a genius for organization.

2 an exceptionally intelligent person or one with exceptional skill in a particular area of activity: a mathematical genius.

Nobody could deny based on this definition that Bach possessed genius.

Andrew


On 5/04/2016, 06:31, "Harpsichords and Related Topics on behalf of Michael Dunn" <[log in to unmask] on behalf of [log in to unmask]> wrote:

Years ago, someone here wrote something to the effect that Bach was no
genius. Oh no, Bach was just a skilled craftsman.

That statement has been stuck in my craw ever since, so allow me to finally
unstick it. Perhaps whoever wrote the email will respond, but even if they
don't, I'll feel better :-)

So, Bach isn't a genius? Is it the word "genius" you don't like - in general
- or do you really find him unqualified to enter the "hall of geniuses"?

If the latter, then please do tell: Who exactly qualifies?



::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::