> Andrew and others wrote ... 

Thanks everybody for your kind answers, still did not get what I was looking
for.

Actually, EITHER copying textual improvements back to the Bärenreiter 
OR copying fingerings forward to the Henle 
produces exactly the same result. 
I wanted to know if some colleagues with a similar experience may have a
reason to prefer one way or the other.

Ultimately, however, what I am really trying to get is somebody telling me
"Claudio these are old Urtexts, there is a NOTICEABLY better new printed
edition!". (No I do not want to get a PDF and print it 

All the best,

CDV

PS1: Reading downloaded files from a tablet has been suggested. 
Good for young people, not for those who have spent half a century getting
printed scores. I am a computer nerd myself, and I am a fan of electronic
publications. However, neither my pocket nor my harpsichord's small stand
will be happy with a large tablet. Furthermore, for either practice or
recitals it is not practical to switch back and forth from tablet to printed
scores, and with more than 2 metres of bookshelf with harpsichord scores, it
is hardly an option to scan all of them.

PS2: Alternatively, provided that a significant improvement over Hicks
edition is available only as a download, I may go for it. Two-face printing
and ring-binding on 100mg A4 paper is certainly a viable option (I have a
binder machine). Nevertheless, this sort of ring-bound thing does not turn
pages as well as a printed score.


---
This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
https://www.avast.com/antivirus

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::