Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 7 Feb 2016 19:00:38 -0600 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Jonathan Addleman wrote
>Curious what others do, and whether it has ever become an issue?
>Jonathan
I can't hear any difference between 415 and 415.3 in any case I usually tune a bit sharp even if the required pitch is 415 because to a string player the harpsichord tends to sound a bit flat. Having said that I stopped tuning for public concerts years ago where the harpsichord is only used for continuo usually with a modern orchestra and they tend to want to go a bit above 440 anyway. I stopped building transposing instruments and now only build harpsichords for solo repertoire such instruments include those at low Kammerton ie a 390 . So far two of these instruments have been the JP Bull single and the Smithsonian Dulcken. The owners, former pianists with 'absolute pitch' (440), happily play their harpsichords at 390.
Richard
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|