Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sun, 23 Oct 2016 14:29:27 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
It is very easy to have a dogleg without this disadvantage, if the lower manual is mobile, you can have dogleg benefits without any disadvantage, and you have a lighter action with two 8' or two 8' and 4'.
Most probably some french harpsichords of the 17th have had such a disposition. I have made this disposition for several of my 17th french style harpsichord.
Alain
Le 22 oct. 2016 à 06:43, Richard Schaumloffel a écrit :
> Front 8' jacks shared on both manuals via a dogleg system was actually quite common right up to the end of the 18th century. the best known examples were English doubles which as far as I know never had manual couplers. 18CFrench harpsichords generally had manual couplers, on the other hand many 17C french harpsichords had doglegs or nothing at all and many german harpsichords had doglegs instead of manual couplers.
>
> The advantage of a dogleg system is a lighter action on the lower manual, the disadvantage is that you can't dialogue separately the two 8's one manual to another.
>
> Richard
>
> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
> Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
> tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
> versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
> [log in to unmask] saying HELP .
> ::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|