Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Fri, 7 Sep 2018 07:55:23 +0200 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Indeed strange. It seems that the author had his/her personal definitions.
"Pythagorean, Just Intonation, Tempered Pythagorean, Meantone,
Well-tempered, and Equal Temperament. "
- *Just intonation*, i. e the grid of pure fifths and thirds
includes *Pythagorean
tuning* (a chain of fifths) as as a subset or special case.
The same is true for the case that *Pythagorean tuning* in practice was
tuned as the virtually identical chain of eight fifths of the standard
scale based on the three hexachords Bb-F-C-G-D-A-E-B,** to which the thirds
of some of the main modes are added: F#, C# and G#. The twelfth not can
equally serve as Eb or D# *** (though B doesn't have a usable fifth! The F#
is flat by a syntonic comma, ca 1/5 of a semitone). ****
- "tempered Pythagorean" is a misnomer of something that is not
identified
- *Wohltemperiert* (*Well-tempered*) includes *Equal Temperament* as a
subset or special case, as Werckmeister (1645-1706) called *Equal
temperament* a "wohl temperirte Harmonia" in his "Paradoxal discourse",
1707 (published posthumously)
Source:
http://reader.digitale-sammlungen.de/en/fs1/object/display/bsb10527832_118.html
).
** Or only the "natural" hexachord CDEFGA with its lower and upper
semitones (B - CDEFGA -Bb)
*** D# (*dis*) has remained the note name in organ tablature and remains up
to today the standard in organ building. Both long after Pythagorean
tuning ...
**** I find the explanation of *Pythagorean tuning* via the
hexachord-system and the main church modes much more compatible with the
development of music theory of the time.
It would be much easier in practice to develop a tuning from the
hexachords. That the resulting tuning is virtually the same as what we
define as strict Pythagorean tuning (a chain of eleven fifths),
Gb-Db-Ab-Eb-Bb-F-C-G-D-A-E-B. The notes Gb, Db, and Ab were however not
Kind regards
Ibo
* * * * * *
2018-09-05 23:09 GMT+02:00 Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>:
> That's very strange. Does anybody know what the difference is between
> "Pythagorean" and "Straight Pythagorean" might be? Is regular Pythagorean
> gay? (I never knew there were different Pythagorean tunings--perhaps
> putting the wolf between different 5ths?) And, really... would anyone
> really be using Pythagorean tuning (of any sort) at that time?
>
> dk
>
>
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|