Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 22 Mar 2017 10:42:12 +0000 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
J. Claudio Di Veroli on 20/03/2017 09:42:44 wrote:
... My conclusion is ... simply that harpsichordists are not much
interested in reading at all. And ... to follow the historical style
(articulation, ornamentation, rhythmic alterations and so on) is very
low on their priorities...
I think it is very simple. When I joined this list, and I cannot
remember how long ago it was, there seemed to be endless messages about
temperament, from which I learned a lot. But practically every
conceivable angle of the subject was covered. So if we want to find out
anything we can search the archive.
And some members of the list have been admonished recently for not doing
so.
With regard to playing, and especially matters of style, a good teacher
will impart more than can be conveyed by an e-mail message, interesting
though these may be. maybe Frescobaldi's advice is worth following. Put
simply: 'keep practising until you discover what I mean'.
Whereas problems or difficulties encountered by makers can probably be
discussed, and information exchanged, more effectively by e-mail.
- David Bedlow
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|