HPSCHD-L Archives

Harpsichords and Related Topics

HPSCHD-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
Martin Usher <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:07:00 -0800
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (41 lines)
This thread's going to have legs......

I think one reason why people have problems with harpsichord music is 
that both the sound and the type of music that's played on it require a 
different type of perception to what many people expect to hear. I 
describe the sound as "something that you can walk around inside", it 
sort of exists in three dimensions. I've met this with chorale music, 
especially when the choir is unaccompanied. This stuff is very demanding 
to record and reproduce (I use it to evaluate audio equipment), I think 
its because its because our ears are very sensitive to any artifacts 
caused by the components interacting (intermodulating). Most music 
carries a strong tune or, in the case of the clock radio, you know what 
you're listening for, so peoples' ears selectively grab just the parts 
of the sound that they want to hear which allows them to manage with 
less than perfect reproduction.

So put it another way, one man's music is another wife's distortion.

It doesn't help that people have grown up with poor opinions of the 
instrument. For example,  I have a pianist friend who subscribes to the 
Beecham view of harpsichords (something about "two skeletons copulating 
on a tin roof") and it took me quite a bit of probing to find out why he 
had such a deep loathing for the instrument. I eventually figured out 
that its a combination of two things. One is that some harpsichord 
recordings from his formative years appear to have been played on 
instruments that don't sound right (I've got one from that era which I 
describe as "sounding like a demented music box"). The other is that, as 
a pianist, he has some expectation of being able to play the thing -- 
its got keys just like a piano so it should play just like a piano. I've 
seen him trying to do it, and the instrument just chews him up and spits 
him out. Pianistic technique gets you nowhere on this instrument. Even 
if they're able to play the instrument, like another pianist friend who 
has used harpsichords in her youth, they often subsist on a diet of 
Romantic or later music, grand sounding stuff that makes the material we 
like to play sound a bit thin. She and I have had some interesting 
conversations about whether Bach sounds better on a piano, its not 
really the about the instrument but how the music is interpreted. We 
agree to differ.

Martin Usher

ATOM RSS1 RSS2