HPSCHD-L Archives

Harpsichords and Related Topics

HPSCHD-L@LIST.UIOWA.EDU

Options: Use Monospaced Font
Show Text Part by Default
Show All Mail Headers

Message: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Topic: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]
Author: [<< First] [< Prev] [Next >] [Last >>]

Print Reply
Subject:
From:
"T. Diehl" <[log in to unmask]>
Reply To:
Harpsichords and Related Topics <[log in to unmask]>
Date:
Sun, 7 Feb 2016 11:14:55 +0100
Content-Type:
text/plain
Parts/Attachments:
text/plain (32 lines)
Hello Michael,
I am merely discussing the wrong picture created by oftentimes sweeping
statements  endlessly repeated about early keyboard practice - which serve
only to confuse and confound many 'liebhaber' - as we often see on this
list.

Of course, as you say, 415 Hz is a useful compromise.
(As an aside, the human tympanum cannot discern any fractional vibrations
outside a full cycle like 0.3 etc.).Yet it says nothing about the real
pitch(es) that were actually used, and is always seen as a mark of
'authenticity', despite the fact that many pitches both much higher and
much lower were used during the baroque period.

Likewise, many people repeatedly state the thumb was barely used, if at
all, in early keyboard music, and they try to play without ever using it as
an attempt at 'authentic' practice. Yet this too is a non-authentic
compromise derived from simplicity of approach.

Neither standpoint is really historic; they are merely convenient
falsifications of the reality.
That is all I am saying.

Cheers
Theoodore

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::

ATOM RSS1 RSS2