Hello Zach,

Unless my mailer has gone defective and its dates are all messed up, this
is a reply to a thread over three years old. not that there is anything
wrong with resurrecting old discussions, but why the sudden renewed attack
on Professor Jarvis?

I find it interesting that some musicologists are so narrow minded that
they cannot accept or understand work by highly trained handwriting
experts, as their basic material is handwritten manuscripts when looking at
this period. Prof Jarvis had indeed presented in journals and not just a
book, as shown in my mail from years ago. But perhaps you don't accept that
the journals are not 'music journals'.

Andrew


On 2 December 2017 at 03:12, Zach <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Andrew, as you seem so enamored with Prof. Jarvis' work, I think you need
> to look at this with a more critical eye.
>

::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note:  opinions  expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the  individual con-
tributors and not necessarily  those of the list owners  nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa.  For a brief  summary of list  commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask]  saying  HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::