Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Wed, 13 Apr 2016 17:12:31 +0300 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Sent from myMail for iOS
-------- Forwarded message --------
From: michael johnson <[log in to unmask]>
To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>
Date: Wednesday, 13 April 2016, 15:10 +0100
Subject: Re[2]: Framing and string tension
>The stability of my instruments has been frequently posted on several sights and the credit for that goes to Mr Ruckers, a pretty great guy in my book.
>
>MJ
>
>
>
>Sent from myMail for iOS
>
>
>Wednesday, 13 April 2016, 14:45 +0100 from [log in to unmask] < [log in to unmask] >:
>>On Wed, 13 Apr 2016 08:30:35 -0400, Rob Brooke wrote:
>>> The most efficient and resistant-to-stress for that kind of bracing
>>> are braces which are perpendicular to the bentside.
>>
>>ahem
>>
>>this is neither true nor demonstrated by historic record. If anything,
>>those instruments braced like that are the dismal failures.
>>
>>b
>>
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|