Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Sat, 21 Jan 2017 11:23:03 +1100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Hi Beth,
As long as it takes to tune it. Organs sometimes need to settle, but not
harpsichords. The differences in string tensions between any two given
temperaments are negligible in any case - you are talking about tiny cents
differences.
Amusingly, on Werckmeister III, Herr Werckmeister himself wrote that this
is not a particularly good tuning, but more a way of converting an organ in
meantone into a halfway good sort of well temperament with the least
cutting of pipework. It was never seriously proposed as an excellent
harpsichord tuning. I recall Mr Paul Poletti has written about this, and
provided the original German source.
It's a pretty miserable sounding tuning to my taste, and I roll my eyes
when amateur groups insist on it. How about trying some superior tuning?
Lehmann?
Andrew
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|