Subject: | |
From: | |
Reply To: | |
Date: | Mon, 4 Jan 2016 09:17:57 +0100 |
Content-Type: | text/plain |
Parts/Attachments: |
|
|
Le 04/01/2016 00:08, Tilman Skowroneck écrit :
> It's just not so great to come home, having to get a new program going in a hurry, only to discover that half a day is needed to get one's instrument in shape. I may have been blessed in that my concert tours usually were organisable in day trips from home, even during the most intensive period. If one leaves a harpsichord with quill alone for a longer timespan, it will need some work afterwards.
Why? I often leave quilled instruments unplayed for months, and they
require no work at all (besides tuning). What kind of problems would
need a half a day's work? Why would quill have more "regularity" issues
than delrin? The only problem I once had was that three consecuctive
plectra had been eaten by a moth or other creature while I was away,
along with several boar bristles - this wouldn't have happened with
plastic! (Besides those three notes, I've only changed two plectra in
over two years since I voiced the instrument (both in 2014, none in
2015). Another instrument voiced in September 2013 has had only one
quill replaced since then (on 11.11.2014). I agree with Davitt: quill is
actually less work (and easier work).)
Dennis
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
Note: opinions expressed on HPSCHD-L are those of the individual con-
tributors and not necessarily those of the list owners nor of the Uni-
versity of Iowa. For a brief summary of list commands, send mail to
[log in to unmask] saying HELP .
::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::::
|
|
|