LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


September 2011


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Scarlatti Instruments" (4 messages)
(sigh) Couperin (1 message)
4' (10 messages)
4' ; GL and questioning (1 message)
4' stringing (2 messages)
A Blast from the Past (13 messages)
A question concerning Goose quills (1 message)
AGVR (Another Goldberg Variations Recording) (1 message)
as good as the horowitz (3 messages)
Bach on piano (2 messages)
Bach's WTC (8 messages)
Bach's WTC (other pieces with double sharps) (3 messages)
Bridge cracked (2 messages)
Conference, Call for Papers: Harpsichord across the Centuries (1 message)
Dongsok's question: (2 messages)
Double sharps (1 message)
EMA development director (2 messages)
evolutionary biomusicology (4 messages)
Feathers (3 messages)
Fingering by D. Ferran (2 messages)
Fingerings (1 message)
Fingerings - Renaissance (3 messages)
Forqueray harpsichord works (1 message)
Frances Fitch recital - Sunday, September 18 (1 message)
Free music score software (multiplatform) (2 messages)
French music (3 messages)
Froberger (4 messages)
Front 8 (2 messages)
Front 8' (1 message)
Fw: Fw: Bridge cracked (1 message)
Fwd: Pictures of Instruments online (3 messages)
Genius? (3 messages)
Goldberg Variations (1 message)
Harpsichords @ IU (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 13 Sep 2011 to 14 Sep 2011 (#2011-232) (1 message)
INDIGENOUS FRENCH Harpsichords II (1 message)
Instrument Workshop's brass?? (5 messages)
IU Surplus Sale... Harpsichords (2 messages)
J G Walther (2 messages)
Leonhardt interview URL (1 message)
Leonhardt speaking on BBC (18 messages)
Louis Couperin (16 messages)
Louis Couperin, genius, style (6 messages)
Louis Couperin--OT*** (3 messages)
Mattheson 330. Birthday (1 message)
misunderstandings (2 messages)
Monsignor Antonino Reggio (2 messages)
More on old fingerings (1 message)
New Louis Couperin Rousset recording (1 message)
New Roseingrave Recording (3 messages)
New season's resolutions (5 messages)
New soundboard painting (2 messages)
Notice from ZHI (1 message)
Oiling natural quills (3 messages)
Olive oil (5 messages)
On working with feathers (4 messages)
Parchment (2 messages)
Parchment Sources (1 message)
Pictures of Instruments online (2 messages)
Plucking Order (7 messages)
Plucking Order 4' last? (1 message)
Quoting again. ALL READ. (2 messages)
re. voss stringing report (2 messages)
re. voss stringing report - apologies (2 messages)
Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal? (6 messages)
scarlatti - what kind of composing? (1 message)
Scarlatti's period of obscurity (14 messages)
Sebastian Albero sonatas (1 message)
self-promotion: my new Bach CD (1 message)
So, you dislike Composer X? (14 messages)
sociobiomusicophantasy (1 message)
sociobiomusicophantasy (correction) (1 message)
Sources for old fingerings (2 messages)
Squalene for feathers (13 messages)
steel wire (5 messages)
strange instrument (4 messages)
sublime Bach performance by Staier - seeking info on cembalo (5 messages)
Templates for Roses (10 messages)
The Lacey Act, Farm (6 messages)
The wonder of the age premier book. (1 message)
thoughts of a general nature (2 messages)
Trying to contact James McCarty (1 message)
Use of 'secondary' registrations (8 messages)
Voss restringing report (5 messages)
Voss restringing report oops (1 message)
Voss restringing report. (1 message)
Voss stringing report (1 message)
weight training vs. harpsichord playing (1 message)
What Leonhardt really said (13 messages)
What Leonhardt really said (or Steve for that matter) (1 message)
Wood question (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Scarlatti Instruments"

"Scarlatti Instruments"

Skuplik-Hein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:35:07 +0200

41 lines

Re: "Scarlatti Instruments"

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 17:41:00 +0000

23 lines

Re: "Scarlatti Instruments"

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:01:53 +0200

24 lines

Re: "Scarlatti Instruments"

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 20:50:16 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

(sigh) Couperin

(sigh) Couperin

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:43:09 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

4'

4'

Skuplik-Hein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 23:31:06 +0200

36 lines

Re: 4'

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 07:02:27 +0100

62 lines

Re: 4'

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 12:54:07 +0200

64 lines

Re: 4'

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 13:13:47 +0100

56 lines

Re: 4'

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 10:42:21 -0400

77 lines

Re: 4'

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Sep 2011 21:50:30 +0200

43 lines

4'

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:47:48 -0500

132 lines

Re: 4'

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 18:46:09 +0100

44 lines

Re: 4'

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:13:25 +0200

102 lines

Re: 4'

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:14:08 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

4' ; GL and questioning

4' ; GL and questioning

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 22:35:54 -0500

112 lines

New Thread

4' stringing

4' stringing

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 13:22:55 -0400

25 lines

Re: 4' stringing

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:39:59 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

A Blast from the Past

A Blast from the Past

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:50:58 -0500

30 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 20:41:58 -0400

38 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 18:52:38 -0700

25 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:07:02 +0100

61 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:22:21 -0400

54 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:25:08 -0700

82 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 19:43:20 +0100

30 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 11:41:19 -0700

97 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 20:31:10 +0100

38 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 14:38:56 -0700

93 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 17:25:03 -0500

24 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 08:20:14 -0700

73 lines

Re: A Blast from the Past

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:29:59 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

A question concerning Goose quills

A question concerning Goose quills

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 00:24:32 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

AGVR (Another Goldberg Variations Recording)

AGVR (Another Goldberg Variations Recording)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:05:23 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

as good as the horowitz

as good as the horowitz

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 14:53:53 +0200

28 lines

Re: as good as the horowitz

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:34:39 +0200

30 lines

Re: as good as the horowitz

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 15:44:40 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

Bach on piano

Bach on piano

Margo Dillard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:14:10 -0500

343 lines

Re: Bach on piano

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:15:36 -0700

358 lines

New Thread

Bach's WTC

Bach's WTC

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 19:11:59 -0400

37 lines

Re: Bach's WTC

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 20:33:57 -0400

33 lines

Re: Bach's WTC

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 08:45:31 -0400

37 lines

Re: Bach's WTC

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 15:09:35 +0200

35 lines

Re: Bach's WTC

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:55:52 -0400

32 lines

Re: Bach's WTC

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:13:58 -0400

36 lines

Re: Bach's WTC

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:53:05 -0500

34 lines

Re: Bach's WTC

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 17:56:42 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Bach's WTC (other pieces with double sharps)

Re: Bach's WTC (other pieces with double sharps)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:19:49 -0400

72 lines

Re: Bach's WTC (other pieces with double sharps)

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 10:42:37 -0400

35 lines

Re: Bach's WTC (other pieces with double sharps)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:27:46 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

Bridge cracked

Bridge cracked

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 03:39:34 -0500

48 lines

Re: Bridge cracked

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 22:56:55 +1000

74 lines

New Thread

Conference, Call for Papers: Harpsichord across the Centuries

Conference, Call for Papers: Harpsichord across the Centuries

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 10:48:29 +0200

62 lines

New Thread

Dongsok's question:

Dongsok's question:

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:29:52 -0700

58 lines

Re: Dongsok's question:

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:43:57 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Double sharps

Double sharps

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 16:40:08 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

EMA development director

EMA development director

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 18:57:34 -0500

36 lines

Re: EMA development director

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 21:14:14 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

evolutionary biomusicology

evolutionary biomusicology

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 01:46:35 +0200

38 lines

Re: evolutionary biomusicology

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:10:38 +0200

54 lines

Re: evolutionary biomusicology

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 16:28:52 +0200

36 lines

Re: evolutionary biomusicology

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:01:10 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Feathers

Feathers

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:01:36 -0400

24 lines

Feathers

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:50:14 -0400

77 lines

Re: Feathers

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 03:29:21 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Fingering by D. Ferran

Fingering by D. Ferran

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 09:44:54 +0200

40 lines

Re: Fingering by D. Ferran

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 18:58:57 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Fingerings

Fingerings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 08:08:06 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Fingerings - Renaissance

Re: Fingerings - Renaissance

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 19:52:33 +0100

59 lines

Re: Fingerings - Renaissance

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 21:17:34 +0200

44 lines

Re: Fingerings - Renaissance

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 23:51:14 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

Forqueray harpsichord works

Forqueray harpsichord works

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:25:51 GMT

28 lines

New Thread

Frances Fitch recital - Sunday, September 18

Frances Fitch recital - Sunday, September 18

Paul Rabin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 18:00:14 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Free music score software (multiplatform)

Free music score software (multiplatform)

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 19:20:19 -0400

23 lines

Re: Free music score software (multiplatform)

Charles Farley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:15:48 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

French music

French music

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 00:09:53 +0000

30 lines

Re: French music

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 01:36:01 +0100

78 lines

Re: French music

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:36:20 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Froberger

Froberger

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:39:52 -0400

27 lines

Re: Froberger

emmabrochard <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:46:40 +0200

56 lines

Re: Froberger

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:39:46 -0400

58 lines

Re: Froberger

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:55:35 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Front 8

Front 8

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:44:20 -0400

26 lines

Re: Front 8

Edward Kottick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 19:52:15 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Front 8'

Re: Front 8'

John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 00:15:01 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

Fw: Fw: Bridge cracked

Fw: Fw: Bridge cracked

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 07:45:50 -0700

64 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Pictures of Instruments online

Fwd: Pictures of Instruments online

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:21:32 +1000

81 lines

Re: Fwd: Pictures of Instruments online

Terry McGee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:50:31 +1000

81 lines

Re: Fwd: Pictures of Instruments online

Ian Somerville <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 08:39:24 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Genius?

Genius?

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:35:19 -0400

48 lines

Re: Genius?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 19:55:22 -0400

47 lines

Re: Genius?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 07:07:55 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Goldberg Variations

Goldberg Variations

Benjamin Steens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 09:05:00 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

Harpsichords @ IU

Harpsichords @ IU

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 12:09:37 GMT

22 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 13 Sep 2011 to 14 Sep 2011 (#2011-232)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 13 Sep 2011 to 14 Sep 2011 (#2011-232)

Lenora McCroskey <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 12:56:56 +0000

72 lines

New Thread

INDIGENOUS FRENCH Harpsichords II

INDIGENOUS FRENCH Harpsichords II

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 14 Sep 2011 13:41:28 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

Instrument Workshop's brass??

Instrument Workshop's brass??

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 19:01:21 -0400

32 lines

Re: Instrument Workshop's brass??

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 09:32:00 +0100

70 lines

Re: Instrument Workshop's brass??

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 13:23:15 +0000

89 lines

Re: Instrument Workshop's brass??

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 11:42:06 -0400

40 lines

Re: Instrument Workshop's brass??

Rob Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:06:31 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

IU Surplus Sale... Harpsichords

IU Surplus Sale... Harpsichords

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 17:50:41 -0400

51 lines

Re: IU Surplus Sale... Harpsichords

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:22:32 -0400

77 lines

New Thread

J G Walther

J G Walther

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:49:53 +0100

38 lines

Re: J G Walther

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 08:31:44 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Leonhardt interview URL

Leonhardt interview URL

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:19:19 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 13:51:25 +0100

22 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 14:04:03 +0100

31 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:20:58 +0200

46 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 15:31:50 +0100

28 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 10:57:48 -0400

37 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 16:14:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:42:18 +0200

51 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 12:36:15 -0400

42 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 11:26:57 -0500

49 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

dragons <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:20:16 +0100

32 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:33:04 -0700

67 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:08:02 -0700

50 lines

Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:31:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:59:43 +0200

38 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:29:54 +0200

54 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:11:49 +0200

50 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:34:58 -0500

42 lines

Re: Leonhardt speaking on BBC

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:43:10 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Louis Couperin

Louis Couperin

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 17:34:26 -0700

215 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:31:02 -0400

66 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 22:16:16 -0500

98 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:16:20 -0400

45 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 08:18:35 -0500

36 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 15:41:13 +0200

26 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:14:48 -0500

58 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:43:19 -0400

44 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 09:50:58 -0500

41 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 10:13:48 -0500

68 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:32:14 -0400

32 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:37:31 +0100

48 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:36:39 -0400

47 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:54:42 -0500

79 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 12:26:49 -0500

50 lines

Re: Louis Couperin

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 13:45:47 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Louis Couperin, genius, style

Re: Louis Couperin, genius, style

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 11:23:19 -0700

106 lines

Re: Louis Couperin, genius, style

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 16:31:45 -0400

98 lines

Re: Louis Couperin, genius, style

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 06:52:45 +0100

31 lines

Re: Louis Couperin, genius, style

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:50:21 +0200

32 lines

Re: Louis Couperin, genius, style

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 11:36:11 +0100

48 lines

Re: Louis Couperin, genius, style

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 06:25:22 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Louis Couperin--OT***

Re: Louis Couperin--OT***

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:37:09 -0400

31 lines

Re: Louis Couperin--OT***

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 20:43:48 +0200

81 lines

Re: Louis Couperin--OT***

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 18:59:46 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Mattheson 330. Birthday

Mattheson 330. Birthday

Diez Eichler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 05:34:52 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

misunderstandings

misunderstandings

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 01:37:44 -0500

157 lines

Re: misunderstandings

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 08:24:33 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

Monsignor Antonino Reggio

Re: Monsignor Antonino Reggio

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 16:11:05 +0200

35 lines

Re: Monsignor Antonino Reggio

Anthony Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:19:07 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

More on old fingerings

More on old fingerings

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Sep 2011 18:01:10 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

New Louis Couperin Rousset recording

New Louis Couperin Rousset recording

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 20:47:06 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

New Roseingrave Recording

New Roseingrave Recording

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 22:20:01 -0500

33 lines

Re: New Roseingrave Recording

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:47:27 -0400

46 lines

Re: New Roseingrave Recording

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:05:38 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

New season's resolutions

New season's resolutions

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 15:45:41 +0100

57 lines

Re: New season's resolutions

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 09:44:17 -0700

54 lines

Re: New season's resolutions

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 18:30:21 +0200

27 lines

Re: New season's resolutions

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 10:20:39 -0400

42 lines

Re: New season's resolutions

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Sep 2011 13:04:07 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

New soundboard painting

New soundboard painting

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:11:59 -0400

31 lines

Re: New soundboard painting

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 11:57:12 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Notice from ZHI

Notice from ZHI

Edward Kottick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Sep 2011 09:24:13 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Oiling natural quills

Oiling natural quills

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 08:17:46 -0700

84 lines

Re: Oiling natural quills

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 19:35:21 -0400

100 lines

Re: Oiling natural quills

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:11:37 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Olive oil

Olive oil

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:29:45 -0400

30 lines

Re: Olive oil

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 10:49:51 -0400

38 lines

Re: Olive oil

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 14:06:40 -0400

26 lines

Re: Olive oil

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 21:31:38 +0200

45 lines

Re: Olive oil

Martin Puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:37:39 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

On working with feathers

On working with feathers

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 16:11:03 -0700

138 lines

Re: On working with feathers

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Sep 2011 13:18:35 -0500

30 lines

On Working with Feathers

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 07:36:55 -0700

57 lines

Re: On Working with Feathers

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Sep 2011 10:38:07 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Parchment

Parchment

Andrew Bernard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 21:37:21 +1000

30 lines

Re: Parchment

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 11:15:06 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Parchment Sources

Re: Parchment Sources

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:03:08 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Pictures of Instruments online

Pictures of Instruments online

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Sep 2011 16:02:39 +0000

20 lines

Re: Pictures of Instruments online

Terry McGee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 10:30:34 +1000

43 lines

New Thread

Plucking Order

Plucking Order

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 04:27:42 -0500

47 lines

Re: Plucking Order

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:57:37 +0100

51 lines

Re: Plucking Order

KNIGHT VERNON <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 06:06:53 -0700

62 lines

Re: Plucking Order

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:01:52 +0100

66 lines

Re: Plucking Order

Rob Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 10:07:01 -0400

58 lines

Re: Plucking Order

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 15:32:49 +0100

50 lines

Re: Plucking Order

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 22:24:24 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Plucking Order 4' last?

Re: Plucking Order 4' last?

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 09:35:21 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

Quoting again. ALL READ.

Quoting again. ALL READ.

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 18:10:08 +0000

46 lines

Re: Quoting again. ALL READ.

Pierre-Yves Asselin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Sep 2011 14:57:59 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

re. voss stringing report

re. voss stringing report

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 22:17:38 +0200

45 lines

Re: re. voss stringing report

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 16:52:35 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

re. voss stringing report - apologies

Re: re. voss stringing report - apologies

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 17:28:31 -0700

27 lines

Re: re. voss stringing report - apologies

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:30:28 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal?

Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:42:48 +0200

49 lines

Re: Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal?

Skuplik-Hein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:00:13 +0200

76 lines

Re: Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 20:23:54 +0200

31 lines

Re: Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 19:26:27 +0100

40 lines

Re: Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal?

Michael Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 13:43:22 -0500

19 lines

Re: Revival instrument: gluing bits to metal?

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 05:03:45 +1000

38 lines

New Thread

scarlatti - what kind of composing?

scarlatti - what kind of composing?

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:56:41 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Scarlatti's period of obscurity

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 20:32:24 +0200

42 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:07:35 -0400

58 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 12:16:09 -0700

29 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 21:36:33 +0200

25 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:10:37 +0200

36 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:54:18 +0200

52 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 18:03:11 -0500

38 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:32:58 -0700

94 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 23:50:24 +0000

27 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 12:24:48 +0200

32 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 10:26:58 -0500

53 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:10:37 -0700

101 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Sep 2011 11:32:46 -0700

33 lines

Re: Scarlatti's period of obscurity

Anthony Hart <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Sep 2011 10:38:55 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Sebastian Albero sonatas

Sebastian Albero sonatas

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Anonymous <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Sep 2011 12:07:22 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

self-promotion: my new Bach CD

self-promotion: my new Bach CD

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 08:18:03 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

So, you dislike Composer X?

So, you dislike Composer X?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 23:10:39 +0100

50 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 18:48:45 -0400

56 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 19:09:17 -0400

33 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 08:58:55 +0200

27 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 10:11:22 -0400

49 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 16:09:24 +0100

52 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 11:03:01 -0400

52 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:41:16 -0400

59 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:59:15 +0200

40 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:15:02 +0200

39 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 14:24:48 -0400

47 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 19:27:07 +0000

28 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 13:34:27 -0700

79 lines

Re: So, you dislike Composer X?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:02:07 -0400

86 lines

New Thread

sociobiomusicophantasy

sociobiomusicophantasy

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:46:05 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

sociobiomusicophantasy (correction)

Re: sociobiomusicophantasy (correction)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 15:56:00 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Sources for old fingerings

Re: Sources for old fingerings

Lenora McCroskey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 13:28:54 +0000

30 lines

Re: Sources for old fingerings

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 08:43:24 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Squalene for feathers

Squalene for feathers

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:17:40 -0400

30 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:04:54 -0400

22 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 17:34:56 -0400

27 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 15:32:43 -0700

48 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 18:00:03 -0500

26 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 21:08:30 -0400

35 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 09:52:28 -0400

30 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:06:22 +0200

52 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 12:44:07 -0400

47 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 18:35:41 +0100

33 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 15:03:29 -0700

41 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 11:15:16 -0400

37 lines

Re: Squalene for feathers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 08:29:21 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

steel wire

steel wire

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 16:15:43 -0400

28 lines

Re: steel wire

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:13:33 -0400

48 lines

Re: steel wire

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:29:28 +0200

22 lines

Re: steel wire

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 16:44:39 -0400

31 lines

Re: steel wire

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Oct 2011 11:41:11 +1000

53 lines

New Thread

strange instrument

strange instrument

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 10:49:44 -0400

34 lines

Re: strange instrument

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 09:55:26 -0500

56 lines

Re: strange instrument

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:04:14 -0500

30 lines

Re: strange instrument

paulmasser.myway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Sep 2011 15:10:28 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

sublime Bach performance by Staier - seeking info on cembalo

sublime Bach performance by Staier - seeking info on cembalo

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 20:56:58 -0400

28 lines

Re: sublime Bach performance by Staier - seeking info on cembalo

Heinrich C. Kuhn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 10:07:51 +0200

52 lines

Re: sublime Bach performance by Staier - seeking info on cembalo

Skuplik-Hein <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 13:33:22 +0200

50 lines

Re: sublime Bach performance by Staier - seeking info on cembalo

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 14:56:07 +0200

55 lines

Re: sublime Bach performance by Staier - seeking info on cembalo

Rob Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Sep 2011 09:04:21 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Templates for Roses

Templates for Roses

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 06:16:03 -0500

29 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Stephen E Kabat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:28:01 -0400

54 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Shannon Sasser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:28:04 -0700

34 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Joseph Salzer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:17:00 -0400

43 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 18:39:17 -0400

23 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Domenico Statuto - STATUTO <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 12:20:59 +0200

23 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Andrew Bernard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Sep 2011 22:52:57 +1000

27 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Mark Firley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Sep 2011 09:01:36 -0500

22 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Margo Dillard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 16:17:51 -0500

81 lines

Re: Templates for Roses

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Sep 2011 15:14:20 -0700

106 lines

New Thread

The Lacey Act, Farm

The Lacey Act, Farm

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 23:27:45 -0700

66 lines

Re: The Lacey Act, Farm

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:20:34 -0400

65 lines

Re: The Lacey Act, Farm

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 14:03:51 +0000

122 lines

Re: The Lacey Act, Farm

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 09:47:48 -0700

32 lines

Re: The Lacey Act, Farm

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 11:17:47 -0700

156 lines

Re: The Lacey Act, Farm

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Sep 2011 13:48:21 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

The wonder of the age premier book.

The wonder of the age premier book.

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Sep 2011 18:07:14 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

thoughts of a general nature

thoughts of a general nature

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 23:01:38 +0200

81 lines

Re: thoughts of a general nature

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:08:49 -0700

72 lines

New Thread

Trying to contact James McCarty

Trying to contact James McCarty

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 09:07:59 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Use of 'secondary' registrations

Use of 'secondary' registrations

Robin Bigwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 08:58:20 +0100

26 lines

Re: Use of 'secondary' registrations

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 11:25:36 +0100

54 lines

Re: Use of 'secondary' registrations

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Sep 2011 05:15:35 -0700

43 lines

Re: Use of 'secondary' registrations

Diez Eichler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 03:38:13 -0500

37 lines

Re: Use of 'secondary' registrations

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:49:44 -0400

41 lines

Re: Use of 'secondary' registrations

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 09:01:06 -0400

35 lines

Re: Use of 'secondary' registrations

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 08:15:23 -0500

31 lines

Re: Use of 'secondary' registrations

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Sep 2011 14:17:51 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Voss restringing report

Voss restringing report

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Sep 2011 22:09:42 -0500

55 lines

Re: Voss restringing report

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 13:36:55 +0200

32 lines

Re: Voss restringing report

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Sep 2011 08:47:05 -0700

58 lines

Re: Voss restringing report

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 17:10:52 +0200

35 lines

Re: Voss restringing report

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 10:50:49 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Voss restringing report oops

Voss restringing report oops

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:53:16 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Voss restringing report.

Voss restringing report.

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Sep 2011 16:05:55 +1000

45 lines

New Thread

Voss stringing report

Voss stringing report

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Sep 2011 22:29:58 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

weight training vs. harpsichord playing

Re: weight training vs. harpsichord playing

Christopher D. Long <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Sep 2011 02:20:34 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

What Leonhardt really said

What Leonhardt really said

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Sep 2011 14:23:43 +0100

100 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 00:15:12 -0700

190 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 09:03:06 -0500

48 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 10:40:50 -0400

58 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Ian Somerville <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 12:14:11 -0400

31 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:26:16 +0100

36 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 14:44:12 -0400

163 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:27:45 -0400

29 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 17:54:21 -0500

42 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 02:35:29 +0200

33 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 21:21:43 -0400

48 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:29:43 -0400

49 lines

Re: What Leonhardt really said

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Sep 2011 22:14:01 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

What Leonhardt really said (or Steve for that matter)

Re: What Leonhardt really said (or Steve for that matter)

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Sep 2011 21:06:35 -0700

253 lines

New Thread

Wood question

Wood question

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Sep 2011 12:49:21 -0600

25 lines

Re: Wood question

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Sep 2011 07:04:33 +1000

42 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu