LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


October 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Leonardo" an uncompromised cembalone grande (1 message)
Amazon's algorithms (3 messages)
AW: Complexity (4 messages)
Case size and their effects (3 messages)
Complexity (4 messages)
Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard (7 messages)
Damper problem (2 messages)
Doug's cypress board, that gets lots of publicity (1 message)
Energy accounting (2 messages)
Engineers vs. crafters (4 messages)
FoMRHI online (1 message)
Further to my posting (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT (1 message)
gStrings (3 messages)
Italian question (1 message)
Jack adjust help! (1 message)
Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell Suites on the original Vaudry (2 messages)
lid angle (5 messages)
mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board (15 messages)
My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975 (6 messages)
Neue Bach Ausgabe (8 messages)
Non-sequiturs again! (4 messages)
of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom (9 messages)
Philosophical blather, further OT (2 messages)
Philosophical blather, possibly OT (3 messages)
Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT (10 messages)
Poplar (8 messages)
Poplar, about wood, sort of. (9 messages)
Re impedance (8 messages)
Ruckers stringing schedule (2 messages)
Seat and Harpsichord Height (20 messages)
Soory a correction (1 message)
Spanish harpsichord music (3 messages)
Square piano for sale (1 message)
stringing schedules, impedance, and tension (2 messages)
Styles of work (cross-posting) (1 message)
The stinger (cross-posting) (1 message)
voicing order (2 messages)
Was I right, probably not (1 message)
was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos (3 messages)
was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos (partly OT) (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Leonardo" an uncompromised cembalone grande

"Leonardo" an uncompromised cembalone grande

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 22:17:01 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Amazon's algorithms

Amazon's algorithms

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:04:06 -0700

33 lines

Re: Amazon's algorithms

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:04:32 -0600

55 lines

Re: Amazon's algorithms

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:44:05 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

AW: Complexity

AW: Complexity

M. Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 10:24:13 +0200

107 lines

Re: AW: Complexity

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 09:58:57 +0100

49 lines

Re: AW: Complexity

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:25:46 -0600

27 lines

Re: AW: Complexity

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:27:41 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Case size and their effects

Case size and their effects

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:59:20 +0100

61 lines

Re: Case size and their effects

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 08:49:28 -0500

33 lines

Re: Case size and their effects

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 15:12:01 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Complexity

Complexity

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 06:43:42 -0600

73 lines

Re: Complexity

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 12:53:34 -0500

33 lines

Re: Complexity

Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 08:59:28 -0400

130 lines

Re: Complexity

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:42:46 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Oct 2010 20:53:18 -0500

34 lines

Re: Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 19:07:31 +1100

36 lines

Re: Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 09:16:14 +0100

41 lines

Re: Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 04:28:59 -0500

27 lines

Re: Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 11:16:52 +0100

39 lines

Re: Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 21:35:18 +1000

48 lines

Re: Cypress soundboard/Michael's keyboard

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Oct 2010 12:56:51 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Damper problem

Damper problem

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 15:46:13 -0400

24 lines

Re: Damper problem

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 16:12:36 EDT

49 lines

New Thread

Doug's cypress board, that gets lots of publicity

Re: Doug's cypress board, that gets lots of publicity

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 07:06:15 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Energy accounting

Energy accounting

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:43:37 -0600

57 lines

Re: Energy accounting

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 15:04:53 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Engineers vs. crafters

Re: Engineers vs. crafters

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 22:13:15 -0600

60 lines

Re: Engineers vs. crafters

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 15:14:20 +0100

65 lines

Re: Engineers vs. crafters

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 11:02:04 -0400

84 lines

Re: Engineers vs. crafters

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Oct 2010 14:22:03 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

FoMRHI online

FoMRHI online

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Oct 2010 21:10:19 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Further to my posting

Further to my posting

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:38:02 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Fwd: Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 09:03:39 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

gStrings

gStrings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 20:10:46 -0500

36 lines

Re: gStrings

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 08:31:31 +0100

43 lines

Re: gStrings

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 09:21:05 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

Italian question

Italian question

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Oct 2010 13:35:22 GMT

31 lines

New Thread

Jack adjust help!

Re: Jack adjust help!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Sep 2010 05:01:26 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell Suites on the original Vaudry

Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell Suites on the original Vaudry

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 16:47:29 +0200

25 lines

Re: Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell Suites on the original Vaudry

Pierre-Yves Asselin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:57:23 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

lid angle

lid angle

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 09:17:04 +0200

23 lines

Re: lid angle

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:46:04 +0100

45 lines

Re: lid angle

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 13:21:49 -0500

49 lines

Re: lid angle

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 07:10:23 +0100

41 lines

Re: lid angle

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 12:49:46 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:42:35 +0200

56 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 11:08:53 +0200

24 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 12:27:00 -0600

34 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 18:44:16 -0500

66 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 08:42:24 +0200

83 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 09:42:19 -0600

87 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Oct 2010 13:45:54 -0600

26 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:12:46 +0100

101 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 07:50:42 -0600

138 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 07:53:01 +0100

51 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Oct 2010 07:51:39 +0200

71 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:34:16 +0100

105 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 11:36:54 -0600

35 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 19:25:49 +0100

34 lines

Re: mass and stiffness, was Doug's cypress board

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Oct 2010 18:59:22 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975

My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 15:45:21 -0500

37 lines

Re: My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 16:48:37 -0400

26 lines

Re: My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 14:31:42 -0700

28 lines

Re: My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 19:30:36 -0500

40 lines

Re: My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975

emmabrochard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 08:32:10 +0200

67 lines

Re: My helix-legged harpsichord from 1975

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 10:25:28 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Neue Bach Ausgabe

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

Aapo Hakkinen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 06:29:12 -0500

25 lines

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 08:29:28 -0500

26 lines

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 16:31:42 +0200

43 lines

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 09:33:13 -0500

40 lines

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 18:56:52 +0200

30 lines

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 12:01:47 -0700

87 lines

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 12:49:21 -0400

54 lines

Re: Neue Bach Ausgabe

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:29:52 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

Non-sequiturs again!

Non-sequiturs again!

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:03:13 +0200

35 lines

Re: Non-sequiturs again!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 15:51:02 -0500

40 lines

Re: Non-sequiturs again!

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 23:20:20 +0200

50 lines

Re: Non-sequiturs again!

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 18:07:57 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Oct 2010 18:03:44 -0500

230 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 07:58:24 +0100

45 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 05:00:51 -0500

66 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 11:31:41 -0700

126 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 14:05:35 -0600

46 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:22:20 -0600

46 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 17:25:25 -0600

25 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:35:44 -0600

42 lines

Re: of stringing schedules, "impedance", and bloom

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:45:26 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Philosophical blather, further OT

Re: Philosophical blather, further OT

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 10:27:46 +0100

43 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, further OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Oct 2010 08:03:00 -0600

66 lines

New Thread

Philosophical blather, possibly OT

Philosophical blather, possibly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 11:31:33 -0600

73 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly OT

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 18:55:03 -0400

133 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Oct 2010 19:54:39 -0600

165 lines

New Thread

Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 14:29:56 -0700

71 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:23:45 +0100

38 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:38:27 -0600

46 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 21:26:05 -0600

30 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 08:08:19 -0700

90 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 10:05:24 -0600

27 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Oct 2010 19:02:25 -0400

101 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 11:23:03 -0600

181 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Oct 2010 22:54:06 -0400

26 lines

Re: Philosophical blather, possibly, blatantly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Oct 2010 10:19:12 -0600

50 lines

New Thread

Poplar

Poplar

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 20:09:55 -0600

24 lines

Poplar

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 21:19:39 -0600

24 lines

Re: Poplar

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Oct 2010 22:25:57 -0500

40 lines

Re: Poplar

Andrew Bernard <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:31:31 +1100

26 lines

Re: Poplar

Andrew Bernard <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:33:24 +1100

33 lines

Re: Poplar

Andrew Bernard <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 14:38:57 +1100

31 lines

Re: Poplar

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 13:53:55 +0100

54 lines

Re: Poplar

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 09:06:51 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 11:13:23 -0700

518 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 12:27:56 -0600

41 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 20:37:18 -0700

90 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 08:33:38 +0100

47 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Oct 2010 21:40:38 -0400

52 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 11:29:18 -0700

94 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Skuplik-Hein <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 23:56:52 +0200

263 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

Jack Reisland <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 12:51:21 -1000

311 lines

Re: Poplar, about wood, sort of.

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 11:20:53 +1100

320 lines

New Thread

Re impedance

Re impedance

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 09:27:42 +0200

50 lines

Re: Re impedance

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 08:15:07 -0500

24 lines

Re: Re impedance

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 07:18:25 -0600

89 lines

Re: Re impedance

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Oct 2010 16:26:03 -0600

46 lines

Re: Re impedance

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:13:02 +0200

46 lines

Re: Re impedance

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 19:59:45 +0200

89 lines

Re: Re impedance

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Oct 2010 13:57:08 -0600

141 lines

Re: Re impedance

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 07:13:50 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Ruckers stringing schedule

Ruckers stringing schedule

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 05:53:17 -0500

26 lines

Re: Ruckers stringing schedule

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Oct 2010 10:10:30 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

Seat and Harpsichord Height

Seat and Harpsichord Height

Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:38:05 -0400

25 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Grant <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 16:21:13 -0500

51 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 17:14:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Gregory Ceurvorst <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 04:01:41 -0400

64 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 09:18:17 -0400

29 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:40:34 -0400

32 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 13:43:35 -0500

26 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 16:12:41 -0700

53 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:17:04 -0500

32 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 19:22:32 -0700

55 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 21:32:58 -0500

27 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

John Erskine <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 10:25:26 +0000

39 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 08:53:20 -0500

41 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 13:11:53 -0500

24 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Greg Ceurvorst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:43:21 EDT

90 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Greg Ceurvorst <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 14:44:47 EDT

46 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:49:32 -0400

29 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 15:47:05 -0500

31 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 17:25:00 -0700

56 lines

Re: Seat and Harpsichord Height

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 31 Oct 2010 20:07:06 -0700

98 lines

New Thread

Soory a correction

Soory a correction

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Oct 2010 08:40:09 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Spanish harpsichord music

Spanish harpsichord music

Ars Hispana <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Oct 2010 17:25:18 -0500

27 lines

Re: Spanish harpsichord music

Ars Hispana <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:07:33 -0500

20 lines

Re: Spanish harpsichord music

Ars Hispana <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Oct 2010 08:36:09 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Square piano for sale

Square piano for sale

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Oct 2010 09:54:52 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

stringing schedules, impedance, and tension

stringing schedules, impedance, and tension

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:38:49 -0500

126 lines

Re: stringing schedules, impedance, and tension

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:30:21 -0600

50 lines

New Thread

Styles of work (cross-posting)

Styles of work (cross-posting)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Oct 2010 08:53:14 -0600

84 lines

New Thread

The stinger (cross-posting)

The stinger (cross-posting)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 30 Oct 2010 08:21:45 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

voicing order

voicing order

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 13:02:48 +0200

22 lines

Re: voicing order

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Oct 2010 09:29:49 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Was I right, probably not

Was I right, probably not

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Oct 2010 07:44:42 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos

Re: was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 00:30:48 +0000

345 lines

Re: was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 13:07:29 +1100

26 lines

Re: was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Oct 2010 07:24:04 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos (partly OT)

Re: was Poplar, now salvaging from old pianos (partly OT)

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Oct 2010 12:31:16 -0500

31 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu