LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


August 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

4' (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
A surprising find (4 messages)
AC Blues (18 messages)
Apologies (1 message)
at the bench for a change (7 messages)
Bull, Dulcken, Van den Elsche (3 messages)
Bull, Dulcken,etc (1 message)
Comfort zone (3 messages)
compass extension consequences (4 messages)
Concerts in Berkeley and San Francisco (1 message)
Divided bridge (2 messages)
dividing the bridge on short harpsichords (2 messages)
elm (7 messages)
elm for wrestplank (1 message)
Figured Bass Help (5 messages)
flemish stand (1 message)
Fwd: Government response to petition 'VandAchange' (4 messages)
guilty on the beanie (3 messages)
hearing partials (10 messages)
Historical Harpsichord (4 messages)
HPSCHD-L was touch weight controversy (1 message)
Hubbard key (3 messages)
Inharmonicity (6 messages)
inharmonicity amongst ourselves (8 messages)
ink damage on paint (3 messages)
Just a thought (2 messages)
Just a thought about touch weight (2 messages)
Legs (2 messages)
LIVE HARPSICHORD PERFORMANCES BY CLAUDIO DI VEROLI ON YOUTUBE (1 message)
Masterclasses with Arthur Haas (3 messages)
metal: was quill voicing, systems (1 message)
mis-placed bridge? (1 message)
missed messages (1 message)
Mitzi Meyerson (3 messages)
moderating (1 message)
Morley jacks (1 message)
Mozart's Fp (6 messages)
My quick repor from Brugge (1 message)
My quick report from Brugge (corrected) (1 message)
Oerplucking (2 messages)
old metal (4 messages)
Old metal was: Scratchings (1 message)
oops (1 message)
oops again (1 message)
OT:Re: ink damage on paint (6 messages)
PB Works (1 message)
plucking direction (1 message)
Post pertaining to a harpsichord maker (3 messages)
quill voicing, systems (19 messages)
Red (1 message)
Report from Brugge #1 (11 messages)
science (2 messages)
Scratchings (10 messages)
Small items needed (1 message)
soft maple (7 messages)
sound effects (8 messages)
Stressed harpsichords (1 message)
String calculation for f1 - mystery solved (1 message)
test (1 message)
The English Spinet with particular reference to The Schools of Keene and Hitchcock (3 messages)
The Finnish Clavichord Society? (3 messages)
To who it may be of interest (4 messages)
Too much arithmetic will not help (2 messages)
touch weight (12 messages)
touch weight *******OT******** (4 messages)
Touch weight and plectrum resistance (1 message)
touch weight controversy (10 messages)
V & A technical drawings, was Government response to petition 'VandAchange' (1 message)
Viennese compass extension sources anyone? (1 message)
voicing observations (8 messages)
voicing, seeing (3 messages)
Voicing, was touch weight controversy (3 messages)
Website for Arthur Haas Masterclass (2 messages)
Weimar harpsichord (3 messages)
Welcome Paul Irvin (2 messages)
Why is the four foot unloved? (12 messages)
William Babell Handel transcriptions (3 messages)
Z box jacks (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

4'

4'

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 15:18:15 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

André Christophe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 12:29:40 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

A surprising find

A surprising find

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:57:27 -0400

37 lines

Re: A surprising find

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 17:10:55 +0000

38 lines

Re: A surprising find

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 10:03:42 -0400

26 lines

Re: A surprising find

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 16:47:24 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

AC Blues

AC Blues

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:01:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: AC Blues

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 14:05:59 -0700

54 lines

Re: AC Blues

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:36:52 -0400

28 lines

Re: AC Blues

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 07:27:08 -0500

54 lines

Re: AC Blues

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:30:26 -0500

46 lines

Re: AC Blues

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 15:12:57 -0500

35 lines

Re: AC Blues

Greg Ceurvorst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:10:12 EDT

28 lines

Re: AC Blues

Noel Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:15:14 -0400

32 lines

Re: AC Blues

Greg Ceurvorst <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:17:22 EDT

34 lines

Re: AC Blues

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:28:43 -0400

30 lines

Re: AC Blues

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:54:14 -0500

40 lines

Re: AC Blues

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:56:50 -0500

19 lines

Re: AC Blues

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:21:11 +0100

37 lines

Re: AC Blues

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:24:02 +0100

28 lines

Re: AC Blues

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:13:22 -0400

29 lines

Re: AC Blues

alton clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 11:35:28 -0400

56 lines

Re: AC Blues

Greg Ceurvorst <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:34:40 EDT

40 lines

Re: AC Blues

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:16:16 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Apologies

Apologies

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:35:24 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

at the bench for a change

at the bench for a change

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:47:11 +0200

32 lines

Re: at the bench for a change

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 13:21:00 -0500

21 lines

Re: at the bench for a change

Martin Puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:46:42 +0200

34 lines

Re: at the bench for a change

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:54:52 +0100

38 lines

Re: at the bench for a change

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 06:00:55 +0200

35 lines

Re: at the bench for a change

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:58:33 +0100

38 lines

Re: at the bench for a change

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 09:46:10 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

Bull, Dulcken, Van den Elsche

Bull, Dulcken, Van den Elsche

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 14:21:36 -0500

52 lines

Re: Bull, Dulcken, Van den Elsche

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:28:11 -0500

49 lines

Re: Bull, Dulcken, Van den Elsche

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:34:19 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

Bull, Dulcken,etc

Bull, Dulcken,etc

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 05:14:47 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Comfort zone

Comfort zone

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 10:10:42 -0400

38 lines

Re: Comfort zone

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 16:21:52 +0100

53 lines

Re: Comfort zone

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:16:45 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

compass extension consequences

compass extension consequences

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:51:33 +0200

24 lines

Re: compass extension consequences

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:09:36 +0100

37 lines

Re: compass extension consequences

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:42:35 +0200

38 lines

Re: compass extension consequences

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:16:14 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Concerts in Berkeley and San Francisco

Concerts in Berkeley and San Francisco

Lillian Gordis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 22:04:02 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Divided bridge

Divided bridge

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 21:02:09 -0500

24 lines

Re: Divided bridge

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:30:45 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

dividing the bridge on short harpsichords

dividing the bridge on short harpsichords

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 19:35:19 +0000

18 lines

Re: dividing the bridge on short harpsichords

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 09:06:58 +0200

91 lines

New Thread

elm

elm

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:05:36 +1000

21 lines

Re: elm

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:11:41 +0200

31 lines

Re: elm

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 13:12:39 -0700

53 lines

Re: elm

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 08:54:25 +1000

79 lines

Re: elm

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 19:22:16 -0400

39 lines

elm

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 07:33:04 -0700

40 lines

Re: elm

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 06:03:49 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

elm for wrestplank

elm for wrestplank

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 14:13:07 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

Figured Bass Help

Figured Bass Help

Kurt D. Collins, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:18:28 -0500

27 lines

Re: Figured Bass Help

Michael Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 02:44:14 -0500

25 lines

Re: Figured Bass Help

Fritz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 13:00:50 -0400

79 lines

Re: Figured Bass Help

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 09:24:39 -0700

124 lines

Re: Figured Bass Help

Kurt Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Aug 2010 21:22:29 +0000

102 lines

New Thread

flemish stand

flemish stand

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:43:10 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Government response to petition 'VandAchange'

Fwd: Government response to petition 'VandAchange'

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:19:47 +0100

47 lines

Re: Fwd: Government response to petition 'VandAchange'

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:16:58 -0700

95 lines

Re: Fwd: Government response to petition 'VandAchange'

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 02:49:49 -0500

36 lines

Re: Fwd: Government response to petition 'VandAchange'

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Aug 2010 18:41:49 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

guilty on the beanie

guilty on the beanie

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 21:01:22 -0700

52 lines

Re: guilty on the beanie

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:25:25 -0500

32 lines

Re: guilty on the beanie

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 11:41:00 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

hearing partials

hearing partials

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 16:10:42 +0200

33 lines

Re: hearing partials

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 12:30:45 EDT

42 lines

Re: hearing partials

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:37:02 -0500

26 lines

Re: hearing partials

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:38:19 -0500

36 lines

Re: hearing partials

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:00:42 +0100

35 lines

Re: hearing partials

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 11:23:55 -0700

60 lines

Re: hearing partials

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:27:17 +0100

40 lines

Re: hearing partials

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 23:11:31 +0200

24 lines

Re: hearing partials

paulmasser.myway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 00:24:20 -0400

57 lines

hearing partials

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 14:35:12 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Historical Harpsichord

Re: Historical Harpsichord

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 11:00:43 -0400

22 lines

Re: Historical Harpsichord

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 17:26:38 -0400

38 lines

Re: Historical Harpsichord

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 22:25:23 -0500

29 lines

Re: Historical Harpsichord

Edward Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 13:54:33 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L was touch weight controversy

Re: HPSCHD-L was touch weight controversy

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 14:35:53 -0400

96 lines

New Thread

Hubbard key

Hubbard key

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:12:16 -0500

29 lines

Re: Hubbard key

Larry Kent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:55:50 -0400

36 lines

Re: Hubbard key

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 12:28:09 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Inharmonicity

Inharmonicity

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 19:55:38 +0100

93 lines

inharmonicity

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:57:56 -0500

170 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 15:12:30 +1000

58 lines

Re: inharmonicity

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:58:01 -0700

75 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 09:53:37 +0200

371 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 03:27:46 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 10:50:49 -0400

370 lines

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:18:24 -0500

32 lines

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 22:33:02 -0500

62 lines

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 00:32:00 -0500

32 lines

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:18:33 +0200

29 lines

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:40:40 +0100

31 lines

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 08:42:47 -0500

50 lines

Re: inharmonicity amongst ourselves

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:30:55 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

ink damage on paint

ink damage on paint

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 09:49:05 -0400

33 lines

Re: ink damage on paint

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:28:54 -0400

96 lines

Re: ink damage on paint

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:33:42 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Just a thought

Re: Just a thought

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 17:21:33 -0400

55 lines

Re: Just a thought

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 06:55:14 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Just a thought about touch weight

Re: Just a thought about touch weight

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 07:14:12 +0100

51 lines

Re: Just a thought about touch weight

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 04:47:43 -0700

80 lines

New Thread

Legs

Legs

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 00:26:33 -0700

30 lines

Re: Legs

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 14:15:36 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

LIVE HARPSICHORD PERFORMANCES BY CLAUDIO DI VEROLI ON YOUTUBE

LIVE HARPSICHORD PERFORMANCES BY CLAUDIO DI VEROLI ON YOUTUBE

Leopoldo Perez-Robledo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 17:40:48 -0500

87 lines

New Thread

Masterclasses with Arthur Haas

Masterclasses with Arthur Haas

Robert Munsell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Aug 2010 09:56:26 -0500

30 lines

Re: Masterclasses with Arthur Haas

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Aug 2010 19:59:52 -0500

29 lines

Re: Masterclasses with Arthur Haas

Kurt D. Collins, Jr. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Aug 2010 20:10:31 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

metal: was quill voicing, systems

metal: was quill voicing, systems

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 05:08:46 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

mis-placed bridge?

mis-placed bridge?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:50:21 -0700

55 lines

New Thread

missed messages

missed messages

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 22:54:01 -0500

962 lines

New Thread

Mitzi Meyerson

Mitzi Meyerson

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 18:51:09 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mitzi Meyerson

Greg Ceurvorst <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:35:59 EDT

36 lines

Re: Mitzi Meyerson

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 07:04:34 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

moderating

Re: moderating

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Aug 2010 16:35:28 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Morley jacks

Morley jacks

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 22:43:54 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Mozart's Fp

Mozart's Fp

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 21:12:11 +1000

59 lines

Re: Mozart's Fp

Jonah Zelinka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 06:55:40 -0500

21 lines

Re: Mozart's Fp

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 07:54:16 -0500

31 lines

Re: Mozart's Fp

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:32:44 -0400

36 lines

Re: Mozart's Fp

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 16:59:42 -0400

27 lines

Re: Mozart's Fp

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 22:39:57 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

My quick repor from Brugge

My quick repor from Brugge

Yann Morin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 17:50:59 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

My quick report from Brugge (corrected)

My quick report from Brugge (corrected)

Yann Morin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 20:59:29 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Oerplucking

Oerplucking

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 12:47:38 -0600

22 lines

Re: Oerplucking

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:16:42 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

old metal

Re: old metal

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:49:33 +0200

32 lines

Re: old metal

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:27:11 +0100

36 lines

Re: old metal

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 03:14:59 -0500

39 lines

Re: old metal

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:39:47 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Old metal was: Scratchings

Old metal was: Scratchings

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 22:43:55 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

oops

oops

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 23:06:18 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

oops again

oops again

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Aug 2010 08:52:55 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

OT:Re: ink damage on paint

OT:Re: ink damage on paint

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:42:19 -0400

42 lines

Re: OT:Re: ink damage on paint

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 10:25:52 -0400

43 lines

Re: OT:Re: ink damage on paint

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 15:38:57 +0100

35 lines

Re: OT:Re: ink damage on paint

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 22:00:34 -0400

41 lines

Re: OT:Re: ink damage on paint

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:35:57 +0200

26 lines

Re: OT:Re: ink damage on paint

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 16:21:00 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

PB Works

PB Works

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:23:45 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

plucking direction

plucking direction

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:26:44 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

Post pertaining to a harpsichord maker

Post pertaining to a harpsichord maker

Charles Farley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 08:52:39 -0500

76 lines

Post pertaining to a harpsichord maker

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:32:04 -0400

40 lines

Re: Post pertaining to a harpsichord maker

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 12:24:08 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

quill voicing, systems

quill voicing, systems

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 21:07:22 -0500

337 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 11:35:09 +0200

101 lines

quill voicing, systems

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 00:24:01 -0500

285 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 09:03:28 +0200

35 lines

quill voicing, systems

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 13:37:24 -0500

104 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 07:13:06 +0200

24 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 06:35:13 +0100

39 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 11:42:29 +0200

31 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 14:02:03 -0400

39 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 15:19:33 -0400

29 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 16:24:11 -0400

30 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:00:29 -0500

35 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 23:34:23 -0500

48 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 07:52:23 +0100

49 lines

quill voicing, systems

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:51:28 -0500

197 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Aug 2010 22:52:33 -0700

109 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 07:42:26 +0100

46 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 09:45:45 -0400

42 lines

Re: quill voicing, systems

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:01:58 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Red

Red

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Aug 2010 13:53:21 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Report from Brugge #1

Report from Brugge #1

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Aug 2010 12:55:21 -0700

96 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 07:49:44 -0500

39 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:33:52 +0200

70 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 15:06:18 -0400

106 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:12:17 +0200

49 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 03:25:36 -0700

32 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:20:42 +0100

34 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 07:13:06 -0500

35 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:40:51 -0400

35 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 08:30:57 -0500

28 lines

Re: Report from Brugge #1

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 01:49:59 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

science

science

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 22:54:25 -0500

162 lines

Re: science

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 09:40:18 +0200

261 lines

New Thread

Scratchings

Scratchings

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 02:40:58 -0500

75 lines

Re: Scratchings

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 11:04:22 -0500

43 lines

Re: Scratchings

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 17:53:39 +0100

38 lines

Re: Scratchings

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:29:29 -0500

43 lines

Re: Scratchings

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 02:33:41 -0500

47 lines

Re: Scratchings

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 04:24:44 -0500

27 lines

Re: Scratchings

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 06:10:41 -0700

32 lines

Re: Scratchings

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 12:29:53 +0200

28 lines

Re: Scratchings

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 06:26:05 -0700

33 lines

Re: Scratchings

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Aug 2010 15:36:35 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Small items needed

Small items needed

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 16:38:50 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

soft maple

soft maple

Paul Gunzelmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 18:09:03 -0400

45 lines

Re: soft maple

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 10:56:13 -0400

47 lines

Re: soft maple

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:43:23 -0400

69 lines

Re: soft maple

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:13:59 -0400

22 lines

Re: soft maple

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:48:49 -0500

37 lines

Re: soft maple

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 10:12:17 -0600

60 lines

Re: soft maple

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 14:13:56 -0700

82 lines

New Thread

sound effects

sound effects

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:03:01 -0500

331 lines

Re: sound effects

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 03:41:38 -0500

134 lines

Re: sound effects

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 10:41:28 -0400

63 lines

sound effects

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:57:28 -0500

190 lines

Re: sound effects

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 12:21:32 -0700

411 lines

Re: sound effects

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 22:04:09 +0100

40 lines

Re: sound effects

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 16:20:38 -0500

13 lines

Re: sound effects

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Aug 2010 20:10:00 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Stressed harpsichords

Stressed harpsichords

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 20:04:22 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

String calculation for f1 - mystery solved

Re: String calculation for f1 - mystery solved

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 21:32:03 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

test

test

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 20:32:11 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

The English Spinet with particular reference to The Schools of Keene and Hitchcock

The English Spinet with particular reference to The Schools of Keene and Hitchcock

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Aug 2010 14:49:19 -0400

28 lines

Re: The English Spinet with particular reference to The Schools of Keene and Hitchcock

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:26:16 -0700

38 lines

Re: The English Spinet with particular reference to The Schools of Keene and Hitchcock

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:19:57 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

The Finnish Clavichord Society?

The Finnish Clavichord Society?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 09:37:18 +0200

33 lines

Re: The Finnish Clavichord Society?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 08:45:50 +0100

28 lines

Re: The Finnish Clavichord Society?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 13:55:44 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

To who it may be of interest

To who it may be of interest

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:25:20 +0100

34 lines

Re: To who it may be of interest

Andrew Bernard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 20:47:33 +1000

56 lines

Re: To who it may be of interest

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:20:31 -0500

61 lines

Re: To who it may be of interest

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 17:31:41 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Too much arithmetic will not help

Too much arithmetic will not help

Nick Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 09:20:22 -0700

52 lines

Re: Too much arithmetic will not help

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 18:29:01 +0100

97 lines

New Thread

touch weight

Re: touch weight

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Aug 2010 23:24:22 -0500

55 lines

Re: touch weight

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 06:58:37 +0100

36 lines

Re: touch weight

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 22:52:34 -0500

44 lines

Re: touch weight

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 07:12:06 +0100

51 lines

Re: touch weight

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 09:21:47 +0100

32 lines

Re: touch weight

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 10:13:05 +0100

42 lines

Re: touch weight

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Aug 2010 15:44:26 +0200

57 lines

Re: touch weight

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 03:37:51 -0500

65 lines

Re: touch weight

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 10:03:37 +0100

38 lines

Re: touch weight

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 23:04:48 -0700

107 lines

Re: touch weight

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Aug 2010 19:09:36 -0500

69 lines

Re: touch weight

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 09:42:58 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

touch weight *******OT********

Re: touch weight *******OT********

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Aug 2010 17:25:04 -0400

40 lines

Re: touch weight *******OT********

Steven Foss <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 11:00:45 -0700

87 lines

Re: touch weight *******OT********

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 20:20:28 +0200

23 lines

Re: touch weight *******OT********

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 15:15:23 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Touch weight and plectrum resistance

Touch weight and plectrum resistance

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Aug 2010 12:46:11 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

touch weight controversy

touch weight controversy

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 01:29:59 +0200

88 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 07:43:50 +0200

74 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 08:52:46 +0100

35 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 12:02:16 +0200

27 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 11:14:34 +0100

34 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 21:40:31 -0500

51 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Aug 2010 23:06:29 -0400

37 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 11:11:04 -0500

37 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Aug 2010 21:18:47 +0200

43 lines

Re: touch weight controversy

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Aug 2010 09:39:07 -0600

42 lines

New Thread

V & A technical drawings, was Government response to petition 'VandAchange'

Re: V & A technical drawings, was Government response to petition 'VandAchange'

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 08:51:16 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

Viennese compass extension sources anyone?

Viennese compass extension sources anyone?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Aug 2010 10:24:49 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

voicing observations

voicing observations

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 12:08:12 -0500

161 lines

Re: voicing observations

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 19:01:05 +0100

74 lines

Re: voicing observations

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Aug 2010 21:58:23 +0200

35 lines

Re: voicing observations

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 07:26:56 +0100

54 lines

Re: voicing observations

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:41:45 +0200

108 lines

Re: voicing observations

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 08:16:14 +0100

62 lines

voicing observations

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Aug 2010 22:34:49 -0500

70 lines

Re: voicing observations

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Aug 2010 07:36:54 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

voicing, seeing

voicing, seeing

Paul Irvin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Aug 2010 15:42:12 -0500

109 lines

Re: voicing, seeing

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 06:59:02 +0100

29 lines

Re: voicing, seeing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Aug 2010 22:21:24 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Voicing, was touch weight controversy

Re: Voicing, was touch weight controversy

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 7 Aug 2010 12:55:34 -0400

104 lines

Re: Voicing, was touch weight controversy

julian holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Aug 2010 20:48:18 +0200

45 lines

Re: Voicing, was touch weight controversy

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Aug 2010 18:01:12 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

Website for Arthur Haas Masterclass

Website for Arthur Haas Masterclass

Robert Munsell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Aug 2010 06:41:29 -0500

27 lines

Website for Arthur Haas Masterclass

Robert Munsell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 09:11:03 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Weimar harpsichord

Weimar harpsichord

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 15:30:34 -0500

24 lines

Re: Weimar harpsichord

Matteo Messori <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:40:46 +0200

64 lines

Re: Weimar harpsichord

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 20:23:51 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Welcome Paul Irvin

Welcome Paul Irvin

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 13:40:52 -0500

58 lines

Re: Welcome Paul Irvin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Aug 2010 20:26:14 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Why is the four foot unloved?

Why is the four foot unloved?

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Aug 2010 17:03:11 -0700

80 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 07:46:18 +0100

59 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:23:01 -0400

49 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 14:37:38 +0100

37 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Gregcrowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 09:46:21 -0400

26 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 10:10:39 -0400

37 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 02:45:12 -0500

45 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 18:40:32 -0600

111 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Aug 2010 22:51:54 -0500

20 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 02:24:41 -0400

36 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 10:01:37 +0200

164 lines

Re: Why is the four foot unloved?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Aug 2010 15:22:49 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

William Babell Handel transcriptions

William Babell Handel transcriptions

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 22:30:18 +0200

31 lines

Re: William Babell Handel transcriptions

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Aug 2010 15:47:08 -0500

104 lines

Re: William Babell Handel transcriptions

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Aug 2010 11:10:25 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

Z box jacks

Z box jacks

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Aug 2010 14:12:12 -0700

30 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu