LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2010


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

(zen) bone (18 messages)
20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them (21 messages)
20th century harpsichords - what to do with them (7 messages)
2X & Hinge Eyeglasses (2 messages)
Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord (13 messages)
antique harpsichord mystery (4 messages)
At least SOME good News from Chile (1 message)
Bach violin recording (2 messages)
bone (11 messages)
Bone Touch Surfaces (3 messages)
Bridge pin angle and placement (4 messages)
Broekman's recital (2 messages)
casein ivory (4 messages)
Cedar of Lebanon (1 message)
Concert Sunday (1 message)
cross scorings (6 messages)
Decorative lines on keys (1 message)
delin (1 message)
Delin info (13 messages)
Diagonal soundboards (4 messages)
Diagonal soundboards again (2 messages)
Dowd Single (1 message)
Eye Rhyme (2 messages)
First sounds from the ultra lightweight (1 message)
Fw: Re: Keyboard rubato? (1 message)
GPS agencies (faux ivory) was (zen) bone (1 message)
Grant O'Brien Ruckers hardbound book avail (1 message)
Harpsichord for sale (1 message)
hitchpin rail (1 message)
Hitchpin rail for experts (11 messages)
hitchpinrail (12 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Jan 2010 to 20 Jan 2010 (#2010-18) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 3 Feb 2010 (#2010-33) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 31 Jan 2010 to 1 Feb 2010 (#2010-30) (1 message)
Hubbard Baker Harris English Bentside Spinet (1 message)
Incising Spirals (1 message)
jones-clayton (2 messages)
Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell recording on the Vaudry (3 messages)
Key covering (9 messages)
Keyboard rubato? (8 messages)
Lenten harpsichord series (1 message)
Name that tune (by arrangement) (1 message)
Neupert spinet parts (2 messages)
New Harpsichord (1 message)
OT for valentine's day (2 messages)
Paulownia Source (2 messages)
Paulownia supplies (6 messages)
Paulownia UK supplier? (1 message)
Paulownia: the amazing wood! (1 message)
PB Works Harpsichord Wiki Updates Soon (1 message)
pedal harpsichord CD (shameless self promotion) (1 message)
Pitfalls of the "over-resonant" case and soundboard (2 messages)
Rhymes? (4 messages)
Samuel Pepys Born (2 messages)
soundboard behaviour (1 message)
Spain (3 messages)
Standard pitch prior to 1927 (2 messages)
Tagua Palm (4 messages)
thank you (1 message)
Thank you for hitchpinrail commentsl (1 message)
Use of red brass (2 messages)
Use of red brass/Corrette (2 messages)
V & A instruments (1 message)
was (zen) bone, now ***** (3 messages)
What is it that makes it easy? (2 messages)
Will it expload? (5 messages)
Wind*** (5 messages)
Workshop in France (1 message)
world's first paulownia harpsichord (3 messages)
Yet More New Goldbergs (5 messages)
Yet More New Goldbergs, now buffs and canon (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

(zen) bone

(zen) bone

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:02:52 +0100

38 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 13:56:42 +0000

41 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 21:32:28 -0500

33 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 07:56:39 -0600

23 lines

Re: (zen) bone

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:01:40 +0100

21 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:35:52 +0100

25 lines

Re: (zen) bone

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:01:28 +0100

41 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:36:06 -0000

38 lines

Re: (zen) bone

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:05:44 +0100

22 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:46:23 EST

60 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:51:29 -0600

38 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:28:16 -0600

46 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 00:04:30 -0500

35 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 19:32:02 -0600

20 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 08:40:48 -0600

31 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 14:51:36 +0000

33 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Chuck G Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:51:05 -0600

50 lines

Re: (zen) bone

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:50:23 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Diez Eichler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 09:36:08 -0600

62 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 19:19:52 -0600

46 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:57:22 +1000

53 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 20:54:46 -0600

34 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 22:52:47 -0500

39 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 23:08:30 -0500

38 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 07:08:43 +0000

39 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:41:42 -0600

40 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:05:48 +0000

49 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 11:18:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 06:27:43 -0500

43 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Charles Farley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:10:50 -0600

44 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 00:22:32 -0600

29 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:59:14 -0600

37 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 04:24:10 -0600

49 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 10:28:45 +0000

42 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 21:06:01 +1000

48 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:03:43 +0100

28 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Diez Eichler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:50:45 -0600

42 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 17:56:07 -0600

31 lines

Re: 20th century "harpsichords" - what to do with them

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 05:53:54 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Re: 20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:00:25 -0500

50 lines

Re: 20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 14:31:08 +0000

70 lines

Re: 20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:07:22 -0500

36 lines

Re: 20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 15:16:57 +0000

43 lines

Re: 20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 09:25:04 -0800

103 lines

Re: 20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 19:27:35 -0600

27 lines

Re: 20th century harpsichords - what to do with them

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:21:17 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

2X & Hinge Eyeglasses

2X & Hinge Eyeglasses

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 09:46:01 -0500

22 lines

Re: 2X & Hinge Eyeglasses

Fritz Sonnichsen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:21:45 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 11:47:48 -0800

32 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:26:10 -0600

24 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 19:15:15 -0600

38 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:27:32 -0500

36 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:36:34 +0100

55 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 07:19:20 +0000

36 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 09:25:27 -0800

57 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 15:33:08 -0500

36 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 17:18:05 -0500

27 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 21:48:08 -0600

25 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 05:50:02 +0100

40 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 05:50:33 +0100

24 lines

Re: Ancient wood becomes new harpsichord

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:05:54 +0000

50 lines

New Thread

antique harpsichord mystery

antique harpsichord mystery

Bruce Garetz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:57:43 -0500

107 lines

Re: antique harpsichord mystery

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:31:06 -0500

33 lines

Re: antique harpsichord mystery

Christopher Nobbs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:31:25 +0000

50 lines

Re: antique harpsichord mystery

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:12:54 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

At least SOME good News from Chile

At least SOME good News from Chile

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 11:03:22 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Bach violin recording

Bach violin recording

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 20:39:44 -0600

23 lines

Re: Bach violin recording

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:57:35 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

bone

bone

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 12:33:52 -0800

25 lines

Re: bone

Chuck G Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:50:19 -0600

51 lines

Re: bone

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:31:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: bone

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:10:04 +0100

51 lines

Re: bone

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:03:04 +0000

26 lines

Re: bone

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 07:15:08 +0000

36 lines

Re: bone

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:33:52 -0000

31 lines

Re: bone

Michael Bender <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:11:03 -0600

40 lines

Re: bone

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 14:40:25 -0500

67 lines

Re: bone

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 20:06:24 -0000

38 lines

Re: bone

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 19:46:16 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

Bone Touch Surfaces

Re: Bone Touch Surfaces

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:31:45 +0100

35 lines

Re: Bone Touch Surfaces

Chuck G Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 13:12:19 -0600

41 lines

Re: Bone Touch Surfaces

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 08:30:36 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Bridge pin angle and placement

Bridge pin angle and placement

Dan Rembold <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 09:38:23 -0800

31 lines

Re: Bridge pin angle and placement

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 09:15:20 +0100

31 lines

Re: Bridge pin angle and placement

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:46:05 +1000

46 lines

Re: Bridge pin angle and placement

Dan Rembold <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 12:09:04 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Broekman's recital

Broekman's recital

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 10:05:21 -0500

35 lines

Re: Broekman's recital

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 11:21:39 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

casein ivory

casein ivory

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 11:07:17 +1000

17 lines

Re: casein ivory

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:06:18 +0000

39 lines

Re: casein ivory

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 17:22:55 +1000

58 lines

Re: casein ivory

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 07:32:45 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Cedar of Lebanon

Cedar of Lebanon

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:26:02 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Concert Sunday

Concert Sunday

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 08:43:44 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

cross scorings

cross scorings

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 09:56:33 +0100

94 lines

Re: cross scorings

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 13:34:37 +0100

127 lines

Re: cross scorings

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 18:34:27 +0100

74 lines

Re: cross scorings

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 20:49:53 +0100

109 lines

Re: cross scorings

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 16:08:57 -0800

126 lines

Re: cross scorings

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:08:33 +0100

173 lines

New Thread

Decorative lines on keys

Re: Decorative lines on keys

Domenico Statuto - STATUTO <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 14:16:16 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

delin

delin

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 03:02:31 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Delin info

Delin info

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 13:17:07 -0600

29 lines

Re: Delin info

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 22:27:45 +0100

65 lines

Re: Delin info

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 02:56:54 +0100

86 lines

Re: Delin info

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 03:33:36 -0600

38 lines

Re: Delin info

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:07:04 +1000

52 lines

Re: Delin info

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 12:09:37 +0100

36 lines

Re: Delin info

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 13:38:31 +0100

144 lines

Re: Delin info

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 15:24:48 +0100

32 lines

Re: Delin info

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 16:11:11 +0100

65 lines

Re: Delin info

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 17:36:36 +0100

23 lines

Re: Delin info

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 17:46:36 +0100

96 lines

Re: Delin info

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 07:23:02 +0100

95 lines

Re: Delin info

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 15:50:37 +0100

115 lines

New Thread

Diagonal soundboards

Diagonal soundboards

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 14:54:09 -0500

44 lines

Re: Diagonal soundboards

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 06:34:48 +1000

66 lines

Re: Diagonal soundboards

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:00:40 +0100

39 lines

Re: Diagonal soundboards

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:09:35 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Diagonal soundboards again

Diagonal soundboards again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 17:16:02 -0500

28 lines

Re: Diagonal soundboards again

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 07:27:53 +0100

66 lines

New Thread

Dowd Single

Dowd Single

Kathy Woodworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:18:45 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Eye Rhyme

Eye Rhyme

Victor Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:48:19 -0500

44 lines

Re: Eye Rhyme

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 22:07:13 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

First sounds from the ultra lightweight

First sounds from the ultra lightweight

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 04:54:04 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: Keyboard rubato?

Fw: Re: Keyboard rubato?

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:34:56 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

GPS agencies (faux ivory) was (zen) bone

GPS agencies (faux ivory) was (zen) bone

McKenna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 10:34:08 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

Grant O'Brien Ruckers hardbound book avail

Grant O'Brien Ruckers hardbound book avail

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 17 Feb 2010 08:04:32 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord for sale

Harpsichord for sale

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:25:13 +1100

25 lines

New Thread

hitchpin rail

Re: hitchpin rail

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 10:44:20 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

Hitchpin rail for experts

Hitchpin rail for experts

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 04:57:10 -0600

70 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:37:22 +0100

39 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 06:04:01 -0600

26 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 06:18:22 -0600

20 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 16:34:38 +0100

49 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 10:39:45 -0500

47 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:58:11 -0600

36 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

Domenico Statuto - statuto.it <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:07:28 +0100

78 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

Domenico Statuto - statuto.it <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:11:45 +0100

52 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 16:36:37 +1100

54 lines

Re: Hitchpin rail for experts

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 02:33:32 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

hitchpinrail

hitchpinrail

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:24:44 +0100

37 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:07:37 +0000

41 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 12:31:02 -0600

43 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:53:00 -0500

30 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 20:54:59 +0100

76 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 14:14:39 -0600

21 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

SUBSCRIBE HPSCHD-L Lucas Italy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 04:38:21 -0600

53 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:38:18 +0100

68 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:14:13 +0100

28 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 14:33:49 +0000

38 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 17:34:48 +0100

36 lines

Re: hitchpinrail

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:09:35 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Jan 2010 to 20 Jan 2010 (#2010-18)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Jan 2010 to 20 Jan 2010 (#2010-18)

Mandy Macdonald <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 11:17:13 +0000

612 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Jan 2010 to 20 Jan 2010 (#2010-18)

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 12:42:43 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 3 Feb 2010 (#2010-33)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 3 Feb 2010 (#2010-33)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:19:53 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 31 Jan 2010 to 1 Feb 2010 (#2010-30)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 31 Jan 2010 to 1 Feb 2010 (#2010-30)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 21:18:27 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

Hubbard Baker Harris English Bentside Spinet

Hubbard Baker Harris English Bentside Spinet

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 20:31:40 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Incising Spirals

Re: Incising Spirals

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 08:38:19 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

jones-clayton

jones-clayton

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 14:37:10 -0800

28 lines

Re: jones-clayton

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 17:43:56 EST

32 lines

New Thread

Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell recording on the Vaudry

Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell recording on the Vaudry

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Feb 2010 16:13:32 +0100

38 lines

Re: Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell recording on the Vaudry

Ketil Haugsand <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 10:57:59 -0600

59 lines

Re: Kenneth Gilbert's Purcell recording on the Vaudry

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 18:10:14 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Key covering

Key covering

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:28:07 +0000

31 lines

Re: Key covering

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 08:34:02 +0000

33 lines

Re: Key covering

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 18:59:49 +1000

56 lines

Re: Key covering

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 17:32:34 +0100

30 lines

Re: Key covering

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 18:17:41 +0000

51 lines

Re: Key covering

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 11:10:14 +0100

66 lines

Re: Key covering

Domenico Statuto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Feb 2010 13:15:45 +0100

95 lines

Re: Key covering

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 08:15:32 +0100

39 lines

Re: Key covering

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Feb 2010 07:39:04 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Keyboard rubato?

Keyboard rubato?

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:21:50 -0500

29 lines

Re: Keyboard rubato?

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 09:21:37 -0600

54 lines

Re: Keyboard rubato?

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:28:32 -0500

36 lines

Re: Keyboard rubato?

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 16:39:39 +0100

41 lines

Re: Keyboard rubato?

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 10:06:41 -0600

28 lines

Re: Keyboard rubato?

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:27:35 +0100

41 lines

Re: Keyboard rubato?

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 11:15:46 -0600

27 lines

Re: Keyboard rubato?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:15:01 +0100

108 lines

New Thread

Lenten harpsichord series

Lenten harpsichord series

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:34:45 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Name that tune (by arrangement)

Name that tune (by arrangement)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 23:42:34 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Neupert spinet parts

Neupert spinet parts

Dan Meerson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 15:38:00 -0500

26 lines

Re: Neupert spinet parts

J Strand <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Feb 2010 16:01:54 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

New Harpsichord

New Harpsichord

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:47:57 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

OT for valentine's day

OT for valentine's day

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Feb 2010 21:30:11 +0100

27 lines

Re: OT for valentine's day

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 13:53:11 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Paulownia Source

Re: Paulownia Source

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 14:09:27 -0500

26 lines

Re: Paulownia Source

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:08:26 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

Paulownia supplies

Re: Paulownia supplies

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 09:59:36 +0000

52 lines

Re: Paulownia supplies

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Feb 2010 20:20:49 -0600

34 lines

Re: Paulownia supplies

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 07:35:24 +0000

63 lines

Re: Paulownia supplies

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 08:30:14 +0000

32 lines

Re: Paulownia supplies

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 05:03:29 -0800

55 lines

Re: Paulownia supplies

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 10:44:40 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Paulownia UK supplier?

Paulownia UK supplier?

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 15:05:48 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Paulownia: the amazing wood!

Paulownia: the amazing wood!

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Feb 2010 04:25:25 -0800

58 lines

New Thread

PB Works Harpsichord Wiki Updates Soon

PB Works Harpsichord Wiki Updates Soon

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 18:27:25 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

pedal harpsichord CD (shameless self promotion)

pedal harpsichord CD (shameless self promotion)

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Feb 2010 02:47:30 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

Pitfalls of the "over-resonant" case and soundboard

Pitfalls of the "over-resonant" case and soundboard

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 09:35:49 -0800

43 lines

Re: Pitfalls of the "over-resonant" case and soundboard

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Feb 2010 17:57:58 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

Rhymes?

Rhymes?

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 01:32:43 -0500

50 lines

Re: Rhymes?

Domenico Statuto - STATUTO <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Feb 2010 10:56:44 +0100

114 lines

Re: Rhymes?

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 12:38:06 +0100

32 lines

Re: Rhymes?

Domenico Statuto - STATUTO <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 13:02:41 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

Samuel Pepys Born

Samuel Pepys Born

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 19:33:13 -0500

21 lines

Re: Samuel Pepys Born

Steve at Verizon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Feb 2010 20:59:24 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

soundboard behaviour

soundboard behaviour

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 02:27:53 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

Spain

Spain

Domenico Statuto - STATUTO <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 12:29:27 +0100

23 lines

Re: Spain

Marc Paré <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 22:31:18 -0500

40 lines

Re: Spain

Martha N. Folts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Feb 2010 16:46:41 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Standard pitch prior to 1927

Standard pitch prior to 1927

Sympatico Account <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 17:17:08 -0600

26 lines

Re: Standard pitch prior to 1927

lancemyers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Feb 2010 18:58:27 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

Tagua Palm

Tagua Palm

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:25:43 -0500

23 lines

Re: Tagua Palm

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:40:24 -0500

34 lines

Re: Tagua Palm

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 22:16:05 -0500

26 lines

Re: Tagua Palm

Jack Reisland <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 18:10:45 -1000

44 lines

New Thread

thank you

Re: thank you

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:30:14 -0800

215 lines

New Thread

Thank you for hitchpinrail commentsl

Thank you for hitchpinrail commentsl

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 15:19:28 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Use of red brass

Use of red brass

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:37:53 -0600

33 lines

Re: Use of red brass

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 09:16:25 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Use of red brass/Corrette

Re: Use of red brass/Corrette

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 06:52:53 -0500

28 lines

Re: Use of red brass/Corrette

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Feb 2010 13:02:35 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

V & A instruments

V & A instruments

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 22:54:32 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

was (zen) bone, now *****

was (zen) bone, now *****

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Feb 2010 21:48:11 -0500

36 lines

Re: was (zen) bone, now *****

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 09:48:06 -0800

58 lines

Re: was (zen) bone, now *****

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 16:19:37 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

What is it that makes it easy?

What is it that makes it easy?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 21:24:44 +1100

35 lines

Re: What is it that makes it easy?

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 08:49:22 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Will it expload?

Will it expload?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:55:37 +0000

47 lines

Re: Will it expload?

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 04:19:11 -0500

44 lines

Re: Will it expload?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 11:24:22 +0100

16 lines

Re: Will it expload?

Borys Medicky <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 08:09:01 -0600

25 lines

Re: Will it expload?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 16:17:59 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Wind***

Re: Wind***

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 21:57:38 -0000

39 lines

Re: Wind***

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Feb 2010 22:28:53 -0000

42 lines

Re: Wind***

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Feb 2010 14:46:52 -0500

35 lines

Re: Wind***

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 09:27:46 +0100

41 lines

Re: Wind***

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Feb 2010 19:03:42 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Workshop in France

Workshop in France

festesdethalie.org <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 19:22:45 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

world's first paulownia harpsichord

world's first paulownia harpsichord

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Feb 2010 06:32:04 -0800

45 lines

Re: world's first paulownia harpsichord

Brian Sutcliffe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Feb 2010 08:46:10 -0800

69 lines

Re: world's first paulownia harpsichord

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 08:24:23 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Yet More New Goldbergs

Yet More New Goldbergs

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 21:02:17 +0000

31 lines

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 23:36:28 +0100

34 lines

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Feb 2010 20:16:01 -0500

32 lines

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs

Ketil Haugsand <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 05:17:37 -0600

65 lines

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Feb 2010 14:18:05 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

Yet More New Goldbergs, now buffs and canon

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs, now buffs and canon

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 03:17:55 -0600

103 lines

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs, now buffs and canon

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 16 Feb 2010 10:31:56 -0500

52 lines

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs, now buffs and canon

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 10:59:33 +0000

49 lines

Re: Yet More New Goldbergs, now buffs and canon

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Feb 2010 13:39:36 -0500

70 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu