LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


October 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

'terrific' Tilney (1 message)
... shops (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
Acetone/PVA and names (3 messages)
And speaking of P-wire (1 message)
Anybody read Barbieri? (3 messages)
Atelier Marc Ducornet has moved (1 message)
Bach WTC in Berkeley (3 messages)
BBC Radion 3 CD Review (3 messages)
Bernhard Christian Weber: Das Wohltemperirte Clavier [was Re: Klengel] (1 message)
Bitterness was "names" (1 message)
Book search (1 message)
Book...Harmonie Universal (1 message)
Brandenburgs (3 messages)
case bottom contribution (9 messages)
Chopin - Fugue in A minor, B.144 (1 message)
Clavichord International (1 message)
cold glue alternative to PVA (4 messages)
Couperin's names (1 message)
Diane Hubbard obituary (1 message)
Distler Concertos (2 messages)
Dom Bedos vs. Ross Duffin (warning: temperament content) (2 messages)
eastern Pennsylvania harpsichord tech search query (1 message)
Eta Harich Schneider (1 message)
Fantasie in G/Piece d'orgue (1 message)
fast speech and decay (1 message)
Finishes (1 message)
Frank House (1 message)
Free harpsichord recital, Wednesday noon (1 message)
Fwd: decorations (1 message)
Glue in Oz? (8 messages)
Goldberg variations - anecdotes (1 message)
harlembells.org (3 messages)
harpsichord WE in France soon .... (1 message)
HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova (6 messages)
HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova - and DART (1 message)
Hass harpsichords (1 message)
Hello from a newbie (5 messages)
Helmholtz resonator, was Mass substitute, was new instrument (1 message)
Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled (14 messages)
history of the guitar was Sound holes and roses (1 message)
hitchpin rail (10 messages)
hpschdler gets his fifteen minutes (4 messages)
Hubbard Benside Spinet, Nut and Original Sin (2 messages)
Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut (9 messages)
Iberian Stands (4 messages)
important footnote to OT understanding (2 messages)
Ins and outs of tuning pins (2 messages)
Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard (6 messages)
just shops (2 messages)
keyboard ranges (40 messages)
Keyboards at the Nat'l Music Museum, Vermillion (2 messages)
Klengel (14 messages)
Klengel / Re: Bach WTC in Berkeley (1 message)
Les grâces Van Wassenaer competition blog (1 message)
List of harpsichordists (2 messages)
list... (1 message)
Long-scaled Dulcken (2 messages)
Maple Soundboards (2 messages)
martin Kaiser, inventor (2 messages)
Mass substitute, was new instrument (16 messages)
melting pot (7 messages)
melting pot****OT (1 message)
Moroney WTC Bk I (1 message)
Muffat passacaglia (2 messages)
Names (25 messages)
New Concerto for 4 Harpsichords (1 message)
new instrument (12 messages)
New series of concerts (1 message)
Noon Hour Recital at King's Chapel (1 message)
On-topic: (was Re: Pseudonymy) (4 messages)
Organ Recital NYC X Posted (1 message)
organs in a landscape (1 message)
P-wire (1 message)
pedal clavichord (6 messages)
Pedal Claviers? (7 messages)
PEEK (1 message)
Practice instrument in Amsterdam in late Oct. (1 message)
Problem postings (1 message)
Problem postings (cont.) (1 message)
Pseudonymy (6 messages)
Quills again (1 message)
Quoting (1 message)
recent post on offline conversation (1 message)
renaissance polygonal virginal (1 message)
repairs (1 message)
Scarlatti (1 message)
science poetry and shops (4 messages)
sealed belly rails (1 message)
Selling my Lignell (2 messages)
sitting on the shoulders of giants, was keyboard ranges (3 messages)
Solved - noisy action on Italian harpsichord (1 message)
Sorry (2 messages)
Sound holes and roses (9 messages)
spam from RWC (3 messages)
Spinet (1 message)
Spinet case movement (17 messages)
switching from delrin to crow quill (20 messages)
thank you (2 messages)
the '&' in 'art&science' (3 messages)
the sound of parchment reinforcement (2 messages)
transferring points (2 messages)
uncertainties (1 message)
Understanding understanding (was sound holes and roses (2 messages)
Understanding understanding, rather OT. (13 messages)
Unknown Wesley? (1 message)
unwilling photos (3 messages)
Watchorn's new WTC 2 recording (being released in November) (3 messages)
western red cedar again (4 messages)
WTC/Beethoven (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

'terrific' Tilney

'terrific' Tilney

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 13:35:23 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

... shops

... shops

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:29:21 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:35:32 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Acetone/PVA and names

Acetone/PVA and names

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:53:45 -0500

31 lines

Re: Acetone/PVA and names

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 02:58:40 -0500

27 lines

Re: Acetone/PVA and names

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:04:14 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

And speaking of P-wire

And speaking of P-wire

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 03:59:51 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Anybody read Barbieri?

Anybody read Barbieri?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 08:34:58 +0200

29 lines

Re: Anybody read Barbieri?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 11:37:37 +0200

36 lines

Re: Anybody read Barbieri?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 21:02:46 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Atelier Marc Ducornet has moved

Atelier Marc Ducornet has moved

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 07:51:55 +1100

60 lines

New Thread

Bach WTC in Berkeley

Bach WTC in Berkeley

Karen Flint <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 00:48:15 -0400

22 lines

Re: Bach WTC in Berkeley

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:22:51 -0400

29 lines

Re: Bach WTC in Berkeley

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:11:22 -0700

70 lines

New Thread

BBC Radion 3 CD Review

BBC Radion 3 CD Review

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:32:28 +0200

45 lines

Re: BBC Radion 3 CD Review

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 19:00:26 -0500

33 lines

Re: BBC Radion 3 CD Review

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:49:52 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

Bernhard Christian Weber: Das Wohltemperirte Clavier [was Re: Klengel]

Bernhard Christian Weber: Das Wohltemperirte Clavier [was Re: Klengel]

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:44:00 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Bitterness was "names"

Bitterness was "names"

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:39:24 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Book search

Book search

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 15:09:05 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Book...Harmonie Universal

Book...Harmonie Universal

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:57:11 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Brandenburgs

Brandenburgs

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:45:01 -0400

25 lines

Re: Brandenburgs

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:21:07 -0500

18 lines

Re: Brandenburgs

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 22:56:52 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

case bottom contribution

case bottom contribution

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 20:16:42 -0700

33 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:34:53 +0200

46 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:02:27 +0200

34 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:28:33 -0500

58 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:13:12 +1000

33 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:47:31 +0200

78 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:59:23 +0200

37 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:43:39 +0100

60 lines

Re: case bottom contribution

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:49:33 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

Chopin - Fugue in A minor, B.144

Chopin - Fugue in A minor, B.144

Edward Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:02:51 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Clavichord International

Clavichord International

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 20:19:17 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

cold glue alternative to PVA

cold glue alternative to PVA

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:53:33 +0200

45 lines

Re: cold glue alternative to PVA

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 07:12:00 -0700

22 lines

Re: cold glue alternative to PVA

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:41:38 -0500

39 lines

Re: cold glue alternative to PVA

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:20:02 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Couperin's names

Couperin's names

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:41:02 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

Diane Hubbard obituary

Diane Hubbard obituary

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:48:49 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Distler Concertos

Re: Distler Concertos

Robert Tifft <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:51:45 -0700

60 lines

Re: Distler Concertos

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:06:58 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Dom Bedos vs. Ross Duffin (warning: temperament content)

Dom Bedos vs. Ross Duffin (warning: temperament content)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:00:13 +0200

61 lines

Dom Bedos vs. Ross Duffin (warning: temperament content)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 23:33:55 +0100

114 lines

New Thread

eastern Pennsylvania harpsichord tech search query

eastern Pennsylvania harpsichord tech search query

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:30:44 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Eta Harich Schneider

Eta Harich Schneider

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:43:09 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

Fantasie in G/Piece d'orgue

Fantasie in G/Piece d'orgue

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:31:37 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

fast speech and decay

fast speech and decay

julian ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 23:30:05 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Finishes

Finishes

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:46:51 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Frank House

Frank House

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 16:14:35 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Free harpsichord recital, Wednesday noon

Free harpsichord recital, Wednesday noon

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:35:29 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Fwd: decorations

Fwd: decorations

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Nov 2009 02:22:31 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

Glue in Oz?

Glue in Oz?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 08:12:21 -0700

50 lines

Re: Glue in Oz?

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 06:48:29 +1000

71 lines

Re: Glue in Oz?

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 22:27:41 +0100

22 lines

Re: Glue in Oz?

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:47:18 +1000

29 lines

Re: Glue in Oz?

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:09:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: Glue in Oz?

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 07:36:52 +0100

42 lines

Re: Glue in Oz?

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 10:11:47 +0100

25 lines

Re: Glue in Oz?

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:12:10 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Goldberg variations - anecdotes

Goldberg variations - anecdotes

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:47:36 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

harlembells.org

harlembells.org

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:25:49 +0100

36 lines

Re: harlembells.org

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:36:44 -0400

48 lines

Re: harlembells.org

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:53:10 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

harpsichord WE in France soon ....

harpsichord WE in France soon ....

festesdethalie.org <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 12:38:14 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova

HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova

Edward Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Oct 2009 15:39:34 -0400

26 lines

Re: HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova

Diez Eichler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 07:17:06 -0500

22 lines

Re: HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:59:08 -0500

61 lines

Re: HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:32:34 -0400

38 lines

Re: HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:20:20 -0500

32 lines

Re: HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 20:56:15 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova - and DART

Re: HARPSICHORDISTS - Sebestyen, Sgrizzi, Gerlin, Sartori, Ruzickova - and DART

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:24:32 -0700

72 lines

New Thread

Hass harpsichords

Hass harpsichords

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 07:04:05 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Hello from a newbie

Hello from a newbie

Elaine Harmon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 00:46:59 +0100

46 lines

Re: Hello from a newbie

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 07:05:45 +0100

36 lines

Re: Hello from a newbie

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 08:41:31 -0400

28 lines

Re: Hello from a newbie

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Oct 2009 04:50:01 -0700

33 lines

Re: Hello from a newbie

Elaine Harmon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 03:07:47 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Helmholtz resonator, was Mass substitute, was new instrument

Re: Helmholtz resonator, was Mass substitute, was new instrument

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:41:20 -0000

87 lines

New Thread

Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:12:39 +0100

67 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:07:33 +0200

23 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:38:50 +0100

54 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 08:46:54 +0100

43 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 09:46:52 +0200

30 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:15:42 -0400

41 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 10:29:47 -0400

55 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Lana Krakovskiy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 14:44:51 -0500

23 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 16:42:56 -0400

28 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 07:02:34 +0100

34 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:00:54 -0700

32 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:10:12 -0700

50 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:43:15 -0000

59 lines

Re: Historical tuning pins: drilled vs undrilled

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 16:44:06 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

history of the guitar was Sound holes and roses

history of the guitar was Sound holes and roses

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:37:21 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

hitchpin rail

hitchpin rail

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 12:14:32 -0700

31 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:50:34 -0700

18 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:16:01 -0700

39 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 17:02:48 -0400

74 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:15:30 +0100

32 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:05:50 +0000

43 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:15:23 -0400

33 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Nov 2009 08:17:37 +1000

50 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:30:21 +0100

25 lines

Re: hitchpin rail

bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Nov 2009 00:27:18 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

hpschdler gets his fifteen minutes

hpschdler gets his fifteen minutes

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 16:41:15 -0400

28 lines

Re: hpschdler gets his fifteen minutes

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:22:25 +0100

32 lines

Re: hpschdler gets his fifteen minutes

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 21:35:18 -0500

46 lines

Re: hpschdler gets his fifteen minutes

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 23:10:16 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Hubbard Benside Spinet, Nut and Original Sin

Hubbard Benside Spinet, Nut and Original Sin

Mark Firley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 22:35:22 -0500

87 lines

Re: Hubbard Benside Spinet, Nut and Original Sin

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 09:06:18 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Mark Firley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Oct 2009 21:45:26 -0500

58 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 14:41:35 +1100

22 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 08:20:31 +0100

58 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 20:43:03 +1100

42 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:28:52 -0400

57 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

julian hazelgrove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 00:35:06 +0200

24 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Oct 2009 19:57:06 -0500

35 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:02:12 +1100

49 lines

Re: Hubbard Bentside Spinet and a misplaced nut

julian hazelgrove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 11:59:40 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

Iberian Stands

Iberian Stands

John Phillips <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Oct 2009 23:24:14 -0700

68 lines

Re: Iberian Stands

julian ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 12:59:51 +0200

67 lines

Re: Iberian Stands

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:47:19 -0500

59 lines

Re: Iberian Stands

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:58:47 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

important footnote to OT understanding

important footnote to OT understanding

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:22:23 +0100

51 lines

Re: important footnote to OT understanding

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 07:47:51 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

Ins and outs of tuning pins

Ins and outs of tuning pins

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 07:53:11 -0700

94 lines

Re: Ins and outs of tuning pins

David Griffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 17:22:00 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard

Re: Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 17:13:25 +0100

57 lines

Re: Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 18:50:51 +0100

67 lines

Re: Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 20:55:20 -0500

55 lines

Re: Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard

julian ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:16:53 +0200

42 lines

Re: Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:09:11 +0100

35 lines

Re: Italian - Portuguese harpsichord and mysterious spaniard

julian ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Oct 2009 14:43:41 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

just shops

just shops

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 19:06:03 +1100

41 lines

Re: just shops

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 10:01:00 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

keyboard ranges

keyboard ranges

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:13:48 -0400

44 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 15:53:37 +0200

70 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 13:30:25 -0400

75 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:59:47 +0200

192 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 21:28:09 +0200

41 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:50:04 -0500

25 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:15:39 +0200

68 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:39:59 -0500

29 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:46:28 -0500

60 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:37:28 -0500

28 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:36:03 -0400

85 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:01:34 -0500

30 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:33:21 -0700

34 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:40:39 +0200

39 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:28:52 +0200

90 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:25:36 +0200

83 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:49:17 +0200

37 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:35:33 -0400

38 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:42:19 -0400

114 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:54:01 -0500

22 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:51:03 -0400

27 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:16:07 -0500

50 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:37:09 -0400

33 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:51:03 -0400

93 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 18:32:53 +0200

53 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:28:06 -0400

46 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:47:42 -0400

123 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:13:48 -0500

26 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 19:13:40 +0200

55 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 13:26:23 -0400

35 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:23:15 -0400

76 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:26:39 -0700

102 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:50:24 -0400

60 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:58:31 -0400

123 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:55:56 -0500

50 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 15:04:32 -0500

28 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Charles McElwain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:03:16 -0500

63 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:41:36 -0700

28 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:59:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: keyboard ranges

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:29:10 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Keyboards at the Nat'l Music Museum, Vermillion

Keyboards at the Nat'l Music Museum, Vermillion

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 14:12:18 -0400

28 lines

Re: Keyboards at the Nat'l Music Museum, Vermillion

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:40:38 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Klengel

Re: Klengel

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:41:19 +0200

44 lines

Re: Klengel

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 10:56:31 -0500

25 lines

Re: Klengel

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 12:03:37 -0400

23 lines

Re: Klengel

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:44:22 +0200

44 lines

Re: Klengel

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 16:56:14 -0700

115 lines

Re: Klengel

Robert Tifft <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 17:49:14 -0700

42 lines

Re: Klengel

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:53:16 -0400

43 lines

Re: Klengel

Charles McElwain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:07:10 -0500

60 lines

Re: Klengel

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 00:44:44 -0500

42 lines

Re: Klengel

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:55:26 -0700

77 lines

Re: Klengel

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:06:37 +0200

36 lines

Re: Klengel

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:46:45 +0200

69 lines

Re: Klengel

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 14:21:34 +0200

79 lines

Re: Klengel

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:20:36 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Klengel / Re: Bach WTC in Berkeley

Klengel / Re: Bach WTC in Berkeley

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:04:26 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Les grâces Van Wassenaer competition blog

Les grâces Van Wassenaer competition blog

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:13:34 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

List of harpsichordists

List of harpsichordists

Edward Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 14:56:31 -0400

24 lines

Re: List of harpsichordists

Marc Paré <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 04:00:07 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

list...

list...

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:43:08 -0700

93 lines

New Thread

Long-scaled Dulcken

Long-scaled Dulcken

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 06:57:21 -0500

21 lines

Re: Long-scaled Dulcken

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:24:37 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Maple Soundboards

Maple Soundboards

Chuck G Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Sep 2009 23:40:02 -0500

36 lines

Re: Maple Soundboards

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 19:31:37 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

martin Kaiser, inventor

martin Kaiser, inventor

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:33:21 +0200

22 lines

Re: martin Kaiser, inventor

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 17:20:22 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Mass substitute, was new instrument

Mass substitute, was new instrument

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:46:44 +0100

50 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 22:45:37 +0100

41 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 23:21:35 +0100

70 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 01:02:38 +0100

29 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:15:08 +0000

52 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 08:59:38 +0100

65 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:18:07 +0100

33 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 09:36:19 +0000

49 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:34:12 +0100

47 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 12:33:40 +0000

43 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:12:54 -0400

31 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 01:00:19 +0100

85 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:45:21 -0500

34 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 05:58:00 -0500

35 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 14:49:16 -0400

63 lines

Re: Mass substitute, was new instrument

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 20:52:54 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

melting pot

melting pot

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 18:36:41 +0100

57 lines

Re: melting pot

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 13:16:47 +0100

127 lines

Re: melting pot

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 09:42:00 EDT

134 lines

Re: melting pot

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 14:45:19 -0400

49 lines

Re: melting pot

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:42:40 +0100

62 lines

Re: melting pot

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 18:32:46 -0400

42 lines

Re: melting pot

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 20:39:50 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

melting pot****OT

Re: melting pot****OT

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 21:51:47 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Moroney WTC Bk I

Moroney WTC Bk I

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 05:36:19 -0700

86 lines

New Thread

Muffat passacaglia

Muffat passacaglia

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 21:19:33 +0200

18 lines

Re: Muffat passacaglia

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 13:01:57 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Names

Names

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:44:24 -0500

21 lines

Re: Names

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 03:40:03 +0000

44 lines

names

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:43:14 -0500

58 lines

Re: names

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:36:39 +0200

29 lines

Re: names

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 11:55:09 +0200

34 lines

Re: Names

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 12:25:38 +0200

37 lines

Re: names

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:41:24 -0400

66 lines

Re: names

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:56:08 -0400

54 lines

Re: names

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 08:30:52 -0500

27 lines

Re: names

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:06:28 +0200

52 lines

Re: names

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 17:45:12 +0200

42 lines

NAMES

David Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 10:29:13 -0700

16 lines

Re: NAMES

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:57:34 +0200

42 lines

Re: NAMES

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:36:47 -0400

30 lines

Re: NAMES

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 14:47:43 -0400

27 lines

Re: NAMES

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:07:10 -0500

34 lines

Re: NAMES

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:10:07 -0500

40 lines

Re: names

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:04:40 -0500

35 lines

Re: NAMES

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:26:18 -0500

50 lines

Re: NAMES

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:05:21 -0400

35 lines

Re: NAMES

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 07:01:28 +0100

38 lines

Re: NAMES

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 01:42:14 -0500

32 lines

Re: NAMES

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 08:22:18 +0100

53 lines

Re: NAMES

bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 09:09:56 +0200

31 lines

Re: Names

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 11:40:11 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

New Concerto for 4 Harpsichords

New Concerto for 4 Harpsichords

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 18:56:33 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

new instrument

new instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 18:12:32 +0200

39 lines

Re: new instrument

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 14:18:46 -0500

56 lines

Re: new instrument

julian ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 22:26:21 +0200

33 lines

Re: new instrument

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:46:34 -0500

31 lines

Re: new instrument

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 13:52:40 -0700

30 lines

Re: new instrument

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Oct 2009 15:12:56 -0700

50 lines

Re: new instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:14:05 +0200

34 lines

Re: new instrument

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 11:44:56 +0100

23 lines

Re: new instrument

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 08:10:50 -0400

55 lines

Re: new instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:54:01 +0200

42 lines

Re: new instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 17:52:38 +0200

26 lines

Re: new instrument

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 19:53:21 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

New series of concerts

New series of concerts

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:57:03 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Noon Hour Recital at King's Chapel

Re: Noon Hour Recital at King's Chapel

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 00:27:55 -0000

65 lines

New Thread

On-topic: (was Re: Pseudonymy)

On-topic: (was Re: Pseudonymy)

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:28:33 -0700

35 lines

Re: On-topic: (was Re: Pseudonymy)

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 19:16:22 -0700

106 lines

Re: On-topic: (was Re: Pseudonymy)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 22:33:51 -0400

33 lines

Re: On-topic: (was Re: Pseudonymy)

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:56:49 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

Organ Recital NYC X Posted

Organ Recital NYC X Posted

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:30:07 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

organs in a landscape

organs in a landscape

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Oct 2009 02:41:59 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

P-wire

P-wire

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 10:15:47 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

pedal clavichord

pedal clavichord

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:29:58 -0500

62 lines

Re: pedal clavichord

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 17:41:05 -0400

117 lines

Re: pedal clavichord

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 21:01:48 -0400

31 lines

Re: pedal clavichord

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:01:41 +0100

85 lines

Re: pedal clavichord

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 08:17:53 -0700

42 lines

Re: pedal clavichord

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 24 Oct 2009 18:25:42 EDT

26 lines

New Thread

Pedal Claviers?

Pedal Claviers?

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 01:17:25 -0500

22 lines

Re: Pedal Claviers?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 12:54:46 +0200

39 lines

Re: Pedal Claviers?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:37:28 -0500

29 lines

Re: Pedal Claviers?

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 01:53:33 +0200

34 lines

Re: Pedal Claviers?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 20:05:06 -0400

37 lines

Re: Pedal Claviers?

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:30:58 +0200

44 lines

Re: Pedal Claviers?

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:20:36 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

PEEK

PEEK

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Oct 2009 14:48:54 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Practice instrument in Amsterdam in late Oct.

Practice instrument in Amsterdam in late Oct.

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 16:40:20 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

Problem postings

Problem postings

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 09:34:11 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Problem postings (cont.)

Problem postings (cont.)

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:05:37 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Pseudonymy

Pseudonymy

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:08:07 -0400

50 lines

Re: Pseudonymy

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:22:46 -0400

33 lines

Re: Pseudonymy

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:40:01 -0400

42 lines

Re: Pseudonymy

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:46:27 +0200

42 lines

Re: Pseudonymy

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 16:01:52 -0400

35 lines

Re: Pseudonymy

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:33:38 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Quills again

Quills again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Oct 2009 10:29:43 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Quoting

Quoting

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 21:46:38 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

recent post on offline conversation

recent post on offline conversation

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 17:21:18 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

renaissance polygonal virginal

renaissance polygonal virginal

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 21:18:38 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

repairs

repairs

Robert B. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 13:13:52 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti

Scarlatti

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:00:08 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

science poetry and shops

science poetry and shops

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 01:33:59 +0200

68 lines

Re: science poetry and shops

Edward Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 20:39:27 -0400

84 lines

Re: science poetry and shops

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Oct 2009 22:40:24 -0500

38 lines

Re: science poetry and shops

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:04:59 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

sealed belly rails

sealed belly rails

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:18:25 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Selling my Lignell

Selling my Lignell

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 11:17:15 -0700

29 lines

Re: Selling my Lignell

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 14:33:51 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

sitting on the shoulders of giants, was keyboard ranges

sitting on the shoulders of giants, was keyboard ranges

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:05:14 +0200

25 lines

Re: sitting on the shoulders of giants, was keyboard ranges

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 08:30:36 -0400

30 lines

Re: sitting on the shoulders of giants, was keyboard ranges

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 22:47:30 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Solved - noisy action on Italian harpsichord

Solved - noisy action on Italian harpsichord

Luke Arnason <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Oct 2009 15:25:28 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Sorry

Sorry

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:44:36 -0500

19 lines

Re: Sorry

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 07:07:36 EDT

29 lines

New Thread

Sound holes and roses

Sound holes and roses

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 07:46:14 EDT

67 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 14:00:25 +0100

44 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 18:50:31 +0100

46 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Oct 2009 17:44:06 +0100

32 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 07:17:55 +0000

45 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 09:14:27 +0100

46 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 08:52:19 +0000

56 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:05:18 +0100

35 lines

Re: Sound holes and roses

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 21:17:18 +1000

38 lines

New Thread

spam from RWC

spam from RWC

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 16:25:07 +1000

19 lines

Re: spam from RWC

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Oct 2009 07:30:22 +0100

30 lines

Re: spam from RWC

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 20:58:16 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Spinet

Spinet

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Oct 2009 14:33:04 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Spinet case movement

Spinet case movement

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Oct 2009 10:16:29 -0400

45 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 07:58:03 -0700

27 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Oct 2009 14:43:14 -0400

44 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 03:42:02 -0500

35 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 16:12:15 +0200

33 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:13:26 +0200

23 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 17:12:20 +0200

24 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Oct 2009 19:43:38 +0200

27 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 02:55:18 +0200

42 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 08:59:56 +0200

59 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:28:28 +0200

37 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:24:49 +0200

35 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:55:24 +0200

43 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:35:57 +0200

36 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 15:38:50 -0400

48 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:11:57 +0200

24 lines

Re: Spinet case movement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 23:26:32 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

switching from delrin to crow quill

switching from delrin to crow quill

Bruce Garetz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:12:45 -0400

31 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 10:51:57 -0500

50 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:23:48 -0400

25 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 11:56:10 -0500

30 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:07:51 +0100

33 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 12:35:37 -0500

45 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 18:41:57 +0100

47 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 15:36:50 -0400

27 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 21:53:12 +0200

28 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:00:08 -0400

29 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 16:11:05 -0400

28 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Oct 2009 14:39:45 -0700

42 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 09:10:10 -0400

55 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 11:33:08 -0700

32 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Chuck G Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 15:59:28 -0500

63 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 02:44:47 -0500

45 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 09:29:59 -0400

59 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 11:50:25 -0700

42 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 17:55:11 -0400

29 lines

Re: switching from delrin to crow quill

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 15:31:38 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

thank you

thank you

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 05:53:10 -0700

24 lines

Thank you

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Oct 2009 18:18:44 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

the '&' in 'art&science'

the '&' in 'art&science'

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 11:53:18 +0200

31 lines

Re: the '&' in 'art&science'

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:31:26 -0700

58 lines

Re: the '&' in 'art&science'

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 16:05:44 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

the sound of parchment reinforcement

the sound of parchment reinforcement

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 14:08:01 +0200

28 lines

Re: the sound of parchment reinforcement

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:39:01 -0700

60 lines

New Thread

transferring points

transferring points

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Oct 2009 18:57:52 +0200

27 lines

Re: transferring points

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 01:03:00 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

uncertainties

uncertainties

julian ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Oct 2009 13:58:18 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

Understanding understanding (was sound holes and roses

Understanding understanding (was sound holes and roses

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:10:16 +0100

33 lines

Re: Understanding understanding (was sound holes and roses

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 12:06:12 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 11:42:26 -0500

94 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:22:09 +0100

133 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 17:54:13 -0500

75 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 00:41:17 +0100

56 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Oct 2009 23:17:49 -0500

54 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 14:15:03 +0100

39 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Oct 2009 15:48:44 +0100

48 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 00:54:15 +0000

40 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 02:57:27 +0100

63 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:53:50 -0500

27 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Nov 2009 01:07:24 +0000

35 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

holman, j <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Nov 2009 03:12:56 +0100

43 lines

Re: Understanding understanding, rather OT.

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Oct 2009 22:43:11 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Unknown Wesley?

Unknown Wesley?

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Oct 2009 10:15:09 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

unwilling photos

Re: unwilling photos

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 06:45:13 -0700

25 lines

Re: unwilling photos

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 17:06:52 +0200

28 lines

Re: unwilling photos

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Oct 2009 11:02:00 -0700

50 lines

New Thread

Watchorn's new WTC 2 recording (being released in November)

Watchorn's new WTC 2 recording (being released in November)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 12:16:40 -0400

48 lines

Re: Watchorn's new WTC 2 recording (being released in November)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 11:41:04 -0500

29 lines

Re: Watchorn's new WTC 2 recording (being released in November)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Oct 2009 20:53:18 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

western red cedar again

western red cedar again

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 18:33:43 +0200

40 lines

Re: western red cedar again

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:04:16 -0400

33 lines

Re: western red cedar again

Julian Theopoth Tait <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 19:13:18 +0200

29 lines

Re: western red cedar again

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Oct 2009 13:31:54 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

WTC/Beethoven

WTC/Beethoven

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 10:05:35 -0400

37 lines

Re: WTC/Beethoven

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 11:08:40 -0400

29 lines

Re: WTC/Beethoven

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Oct 2009 09:39:00 -0500

44 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu