LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


August 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

***** wenches (1 message)
1st Verlet Froberger recording again available (5 messages)
2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria (2 messages)
a Saturday morning thoughts for the day (1 message)
Anonymity redux - la grande & ancienne Mxnxstrxndxsx (1 message)
Another link to Verlet (1 message)
another thing (DW piano) (8 messages)
ardours of a maid was copper boilers (1 message)
As seen on Craigslist (2 messages)
back to THE problem with the old stuff (2 messages)
Barbour online and Mersenne (2 messages)
bending (1 message)
Bending addenda (3 messages)
Bending addending (1 message)
Bending addendum (2 messages)
bending apparatus (21 messages)
bending forms (1 message)
bending pine (11 messages)
bending pine was plan C, was B (2 messages)
bending pine, plan B (7 messages)
bending poplar (1 message)
bentside curves (1 message)
Bentsides: Aussie timbers (3 messages)
Boalch database? (6 messages)
chemists? (2 messages)
Clementi sonatinas (8 messages)
cold wet bending (5 messages)
Confessions of a lurker (4 messages)
conveniant ommission (3 messages)
copper boilers (7 messages)
copper boilers (getting OT!) (1 message)
copper boilers, certainly OT (5 messages)
copper boilers: OT (1 message)
custodians... (1 message)
Custos/custodes (1 message)
Dantone's Goldberg CD Availability (4 messages)
David McGuinness recital available until Saturday on BBC iPlayer (1 message)
Devie - Liberte, Inegalite, Musicalite... (1 message)
Devie's Werckmeister (French speakers please) (1 message)
Difference tone perception (13 messages)
Dulce Melos (3 messages)
DW piano postscript (4 messages)
Early French Ordinaire Temperament (5 messages)
Editions? (1 message)
Erard's London pianos (1 message)
Food for thought (7 messages)
food for thought / facebook demonology (1 message)
Food for weasel thought (1 message)
Fortepiano recordings (3 messages)
French sharps (12 messages)
French sharps - one performer's perspective (1 message)
funny things by the hitchpins (2 messages)
Fw: 2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria (2 messages)
Fw: Re: Instruments as envelopes (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Side-damping (2 messages)
Getting along on an internet list and things we could talk about (2 messages)
Gobbldey gook (2 messages)
Good question! (1 message)
Guitarpsichord (1 message)
harmonic "waste" and widened 5ths (2 messages)
Harmonische Abfall (2 messages)
HARPSICHORDS IN THE MEDIA (1 message)
Help Wanted with New Advent/Christmas Music (1 message)
Hildebrandt, again (3 messages)
Ho-hum, music again! (What?!) flexible Just intonation (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception (6 messages)
HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style (Forgot Paul McCartney) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style (synth strings vs real strings) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent (6 messages)
HPSCHD-L I'm sure this is a stupid question. . . (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L I'm sure this is [not] a stupid question. . . (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Kirckman pitch level - Tuning fork A (3 messages)
HPSCHD-L Michael Jackson (1 message)
HPSCHD-L not a page-turner (1 message)
HPSCHD-L slightly OT rant about copyright (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26 (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26***seriously off-topic*** (3 messages)
I'm sure this is a stupid question. . . (4 messages)
I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .no it is not (2 messages)
il pino domestico was bending pine (2 messages)
Instruments as envelopes (2 messages)
Instruments as penevoles (1 message)
jones-clayton spinet (3 messages)
Kerfluffle (1 message)
Kerstin Schwarz's Cristofori (1 message)
Lego Harpsichord (1 message)
libraries - copying and photographing policies (6 messages)
lightning (1 message)
List of topics (1 message)
Listening to fortepianos (4 messages)
Long Drawn Back and Forth arguement (3 messages)
Mark Kroll performance available in WGBH's archive (2 messages)
Mersenne/Chaumont (17 messages)
misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings (7 messages)
Mouse ear damper holes (3 messages)
Natural Wool Cloth (7 messages)
New Advent/Christmas Music (1 message)
New Music.... (2 messages)
north american redwood (9 messages)
objection to the DW piano (12 messages)
Offensive? NO LONGER (4 messages)
Offensive? NO LONGER Happy now, guys? (1 message)
Offensive? was side damping and discourse and manners (1 message)
oral history was copper boilers (1 message)
OT: the mystery quartet? (3 messages)
Owen Jorgensen's Death (3 messages)
Owen Jorgensen's Death - OBITUAIRE (1 message)
P-wire update (1 message)
pensée (1 message)
pine bending conclusion (1 message)
pine species (7 messages)
Pinnock performance (3 messages)
Pinnock stand (1 message)
private: anybody near Southampton, uk? (1 message)
QUOTING!!! (2 messages)
reading comprehension was objection to the DW piano (5 messages)
refined vices, was Shameful (4 messages)
Salieri's bad harpsichord (1 message)
Salieri's bad harpsichord, veering off into other anecdotal stuff (2 messages)
Scarlatti in Sethares' book (1 message)
Scarlatti in Sethares' book-temperament (2 messages)
Sethares' book (3 messages)
shame (1 message)
Shameful (4 messages)
Shameful [?] (1 message)
Sharps (1 message)
side damping and discourse and manners (2 messages)
Side-damping (17 messages)
Side-damping and manners (2 messages)
Taskin 1787 (2 messages)
Temperament in nineteenth century Italian piano making (5 messages)
Temperament of the Donat clavichord, was Ton Koopman on a number of matters (1 message)
THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies (7 messages)
THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies is Paul (5 messages)
The thin white line (2 messages)
Ton Koopman and TRANSLATION (3 messages)
Ton Koopman on a number of matters (5 messages)
Ton Koopman on a number of matters and TRANSLATION (4 messages)
Trying to think constructively about this List (6 messages)
Unharmonischer Abfall (7 messages)
Unmeasured preludes (4 messages)
Vallotti,/Young, brave Injuns, and assorted vegetable products (1 message)
Variable intonation (1 message)
Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception (4 messages)
Vaudry recording (1 message)
verte cito - not a page-turner? (12 messages)
Virtual Morphology (was Food for Thought) (2 messages)
Which QUI PASSE? (1 message)
who is a troll, was food for... (1 message)
Who's got FoMRHI? (2 messages)
Workshop "Il canto dei martelli" Making hammers sing con Christopher Clarke (1 message)
WTCII - wrong notes? (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

***** wenches

***** wenches

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 10:41:54 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

1st Verlet Froberger recording again available

1st Verlet Froberger recording again available

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:57:33 -0500

26 lines

1st Verlet Froberger recording again available

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 10:39:04 +0100

31 lines

Re: 1st Verlet Froberger recording again available

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 05:52:23 -0500

41 lines

Re: 1st Verlet Froberger recording again available

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 13:03:20 +0100

41 lines

Re: 1st Verlet Froberger recording again available

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 07:33:21 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria

Re: 2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 18:22:04 -0700

115 lines

Re: 2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:22:19 -0500

181 lines

New Thread

a Saturday morning thoughts for the day

a Saturday morning thoughts for the day

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 08:05:51 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Anonymity redux - la grande & ancienne Mxnxstrxndxsx

Anonymity redux - la grande & ancienne Mxnxstrxndxsx

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:09:23 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Another link to Verlet

Another link to Verlet

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:59:42 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

another thing (DW piano)

another thing (DW piano)

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 21:43:57 +0200

51 lines

Re: another thing (DW piano)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 17:24:43 -0500

48 lines

Re: another thing (DW piano)

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 01:24:15 +0200

47 lines

Re: another thing (DW piano)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:18:56 -0600

76 lines

Re: another thing (DW piano)

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:22:54 +0200

51 lines

Re: another thing (DW piano)

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 13:32:05 -0400

47 lines

Re: another thing (DW piano)

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:54:51 +0100

42 lines

Re: another thing (DW piano)

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 23:13:33 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

ardours of a maid was copper boilers

ardours of a maid was copper boilers

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 16:12:53 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

As seen on Craigslist

As seen on Craigslist

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 03:18:12 -0500

23 lines

Re: As seen on Craigslist

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 16:04:11 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

back to THE problem with the old stuff

Re: back to THE problem with the old stuff

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 02:41:10 -0500

77 lines

Re: back to THE problem with the old stuff

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:23:33 +0200

82 lines

New Thread

Barbour online and Mersenne

Barbour online and Mersenne

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 11:42:38 +0100

43 lines

Re: Barbour online and Mersenne

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:01:56 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

bending

bending

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:58:09 -0700

79 lines

New Thread

Bending addenda

Re: Bending addenda

Giulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:19:39 +0200

36 lines

Re: Bending addenda

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:42:33 -0400

34 lines

Re: Bending addenda

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:35:56 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Bending addending

Re: Bending addending

Giulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 09:16:57 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Bending addendum

Bending addendum

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 14:04:59 -0700

50 lines

Re: Bending addendum

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:38:27 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

bending apparatus

bending apparatus

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 13:52:41 +0200

29 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:32:41 -0700

32 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 10:38:17 -0700

21 lines

Re: bending apparatus

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 00:28:03 +0200

41 lines

Re: bending apparatus

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 00:42:16 +0200

31 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:49:41 +0100

27 lines

Re: bending apparatus

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 09:03:12 +0200

25 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 07:56:55 -0400

61 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:13:38 +0100

28 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 16:24:32 +0100

107 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 19:18:44 +0200

52 lines

Re: bending apparatus

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 10:21:17 +0200

36 lines

Re: bending apparatus

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:11:14 +1000

63 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:41:12 -0400

26 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 15:30:55 -0400

34 lines

Re: bending apparatus

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:19:56 +0200

46 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:52:07 -0500

73 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 18:11:28 +1000

27 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 12:42:55 +0200

30 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 13:24:35 -0400

20 lines

Re: bending apparatus

Martin Puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 19:57:25 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

bending forms

bending forms

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 06:55:00 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

bending pine

bending pine

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 00:19:40 +0200

31 lines

Re: bending pine

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:50:50 +0100

107 lines

Re: bending pine

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 05:55:40 -0500

68 lines

Re: bending pine

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:19:48 +0200

67 lines

Re: bending pine

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 13:54:32 +0200

38 lines

Re: bending pine

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:57:05 +0200

30 lines

Re: bending pine

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 10:20:05 -0400

40 lines

Re: bending pine

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:32:38 +0200

41 lines

Re: bending pine

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 14:51:12 -0400

32 lines

Re: bending pine

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 21:07:38 +0200

30 lines

bending pine

Giulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:53:33 +0200

56 lines

New Thread

bending pine was plan C, was B

Re: bending pine was plan C, was B

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:34:23 +0200

54 lines

Re: bending pine was plan C, was B

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:38:37 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

bending pine, plan B

bending pine, plan B

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:10:50 +0200

45 lines

Re: bending pine, plan B

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 23:20:07 +1000

24 lines

Re: bending pine, plan B

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:06:31 +0200

32 lines

Re: bending pine, plan B

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 17:08:30 +0200

41 lines

Re: bending pine, plan B

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 14:45:16 -0400

47 lines

Re: bending pine, plan B

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:55:39 +0200

37 lines

Re: bending pine, plan B

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 21:38:04 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

bending poplar

bending poplar

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 12:25:40 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

bentside curves

bentside curves

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:59:00 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Bentsides: Aussie timbers

Bentsides: Aussie timbers

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:38:04 +1000

48 lines

Re: Bentsides: Aussie timbers

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:11:53 +1000

74 lines

Re: Bentsides: Aussie timbers

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:34:40 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Boalch database?

Boalch database?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:16:42 +0100

55 lines

Re: Boalch database?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:35:33 +0100

32 lines

Re: Boalch database?

R. D. Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:44:09 +0200

74 lines

Re: Boalch database?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 12:48:18 +0100

33 lines

Re: Boalch database?

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 09:40:57 -0500

17 lines

Re: Boalch database?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 13:13:01 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

chemists?

chemists?

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 14:48:50 +0200

20 lines

Re: chemists?

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 09:09:41 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Clementi sonatinas

Clementi sonatinas

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:27:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: Clementi sonatinas

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:58:05 -0500

59 lines

Re: Clementi sonatinas

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:02:04 -0400

47 lines

Re: Clementi sonatinas

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:45:16 -0500

45 lines

Re: Clementi sonatinas

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:01:16 -0500

96 lines

Re: Clementi sonatinas

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:07:23 -0400

33 lines

Re: Clementi sonatinas

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:15:33 -0400

69 lines

Re: Clementi sonatinas

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:03:13 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

cold wet bending

cold wet bending

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 22:11:42 +0200

21 lines

Re: cold wet bending

Slowik, Kenneth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:50:37 -0400

43 lines

Re: cold wet bending

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 23:17:51 +0200

28 lines

Re: cold wet bending

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:33:07 -0500

44 lines

Re: cold wet bending

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:37:01 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Confessions of a lurker

Confessions of a lurker

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:38:31 +0200

40 lines

Re: Confessions of a lurker

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:14:51 EDT

59 lines

Re: Confessions of a lurker

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:21:38 -0400

63 lines

Re: Confessions of a lurker

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:46:34 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

conveniant ommission

conveniant ommission

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:53:52 +0200

54 lines

Re: conveniant ommission

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 13:04:39 +0100

24 lines

Re: conveniant ommission

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:07:14 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

copper boilers

copper boilers

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:09:30 -0400

55 lines

Re: copper boilers

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 22:48:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: copper boilers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 08:33:47 +0100

38 lines

Re: copper boilers

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 09:44:00 +0200

22 lines

Re: copper boilers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 08:51:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: copper boilers

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 07:27:29 -0500

33 lines

Re: copper boilers

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:00:02 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

copper boilers (getting OT!)

Re: copper boilers (getting OT!)

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 08:11:15 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

copper boilers, certainly OT

Re: copper boilers, certainly OT

Doug Cutler <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 10:08:07 -0400

45 lines

Re: copper boilers, certainly OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 09:38:27 -0600

83 lines

Re: copper boilers, certainly OT

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 17:35:52 +0100

37 lines

Re: copper boilers, certainly OT

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 14:36:43 -0400

30 lines

Re: copper boilers, certainly OT

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 17:43:21 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

copper boilers: OT

Re: copper boilers: OT

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 21:08:42 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

custodians...

custodians...

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:17:39 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Custos/custodes

Custos/custodes

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:00:31 EDT

63 lines

New Thread

Dantone's Goldberg CD Availability

Dantone's Goldberg CD Availability

David Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 20:51:06 EDT

34 lines

Dantone's Goldberg CD Availability

John, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 21:42:09 -0400

26 lines

Re: Dantone's Goldberg CD Availability

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 09:58:08 -0400

34 lines

Re: Dantone's Goldberg CD Availability

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 07:04:11 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

David McGuinness recital available until Saturday on BBC iPlayer

David McGuinness recital available until Saturday on BBC iPlayer

Richard John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:51:49 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Devie - Liberte, Inegalite, Musicalite...

Devie - Liberte, Inegalite, Musicalite...

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:33:50 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Devie's Werckmeister (French speakers please)

Devie's Werckmeister (French speakers please)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 23:47:50 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Difference tone perception

Difference tone perception

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:07:29 +0200

95 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 08:34:35 +0100

120 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:52:05 +0200

146 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 03:56:29 EDT

27 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 09:35:09 +0100

42 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 11:12:45 +0200

50 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:47:27 +0100

45 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:15:25 -0500

34 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:39:11 +0100

60 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:50:12 +0200

56 lines

Re: Difference tone perception

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:12:30 +0200

118 lines

Difference tone perception

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:28:35 +0200

39 lines

Difference tone perception

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 16:46:58 +0200

55 lines

New Thread

Dulce Melos

Dulce Melos

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 09:10:41 -0700

33 lines

Re: Dulce Melos

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:26:42 +0100

57 lines

Re: Dulce Melos

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:18:27 -0700

85 lines

New Thread

DW piano postscript

DW piano postscript

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:26:45 +0200

46 lines

Re: DW piano postscript

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:45:48 -0500

34 lines

Re: DW piano postscript

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 23:25:20 -0600

74 lines

Re: DW piano postscript

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:36:12 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

Early French Ordinaire Temperament

Early French Ordinaire Temperament

Chuck G Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 12:59:56 -0500

43 lines

Re: Early French Ordinaire Temperament

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 21:39:54 +0200

55 lines

Re: Early French Ordinaire Temperament

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:16:19 +0200

47 lines

Re: Early French Ordinaire Temperament

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:25:24 -0400

62 lines

Re: Early French Ordinaire Temperament

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 20:31:22 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Editions?

Editions?

Edward Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 08:24:41 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Erard's London pianos

Erard's London pianos

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:04:49 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

Food for thought

Food for thought

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Aug 2009 22:36:57 -0500

89 lines

Re: Food for thought

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Aug 2009 23:20:16 -0500

39 lines

Re: Food for thought

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 02:05:10 -0500

78 lines

Re: Food for thought

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 08:24:40 +0100

26 lines

Re: Food for thought

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:08:53 +0100

68 lines

Food for thought

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:15:19 GMT

23 lines

Re: Food for thought

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 19:52:03 +0200

62 lines

New Thread

food for thought / facebook demonology

food for thought / facebook demonology

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:09:17 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

Food for weasel thought

Re: Food for weasel thought

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 09:50:33 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Fortepiano recordings

Fortepiano recordings

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 22:52:58 EDT

26 lines

Re: Fortepiano recordings

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:49:32 +0200

40 lines

Re: Fortepiano recordings

John, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 22:23:29 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

French sharps

French sharps

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:11:56 +1000

53 lines

Re: French sharps

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:23:24 +1000

70 lines

Re: French sharps

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:31:12 +0100

38 lines

Re: French sharps

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:59:06 -0500

32 lines

Re: French sharps

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:20:48 +0100

47 lines

Re: French sharps

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:16:34 +0000

59 lines

Re: French sharps

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:30:53 EDT

42 lines

Re: French sharps

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:45:58 -0500

72 lines

Re: French sharps

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 15:53:18 -0400

59 lines

Re: French sharps

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 16:00:45 EDT

35 lines

Re: French sharps

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 13:16:06 -0700

138 lines

Re: French sharps

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 21:30:26 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

French sharps - one performer's perspective

French sharps - one performer's perspective

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:46:30 EDT

63 lines

New Thread

funny things by the hitchpins

funny things by the hitchpins

Giulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 01:26:53 +0200

20 lines

Re: funny things by the hitchpins

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 10:19:25 +1000

38 lines

New Thread

Fw: 2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria

Fw: 2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 19:45:38 -0400

121 lines

Re: Fw: 2 New Mozart Works Presented in Austria

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 09:54:43 +0100

231 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: Instruments as envelopes

Fw: Re: Instruments as envelopes

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 18:36:41 -0700

111 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Side-damping

Fwd: Re: Side-damping

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:29:28 +0200

61 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Side-damping

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 08:15:52 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Getting along on an internet list and things we could talk about

Getting along on an internet list and things we could talk about

Gesine Lohr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 17:57:19 -0700

91 lines

Re: Getting along on an internet list and things we could talk about

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:00:02 -0700

106 lines

New Thread

Gobbldey gook

Gobbldey gook

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 03:15:49 -0500

64 lines

Re: Gobbldey gook

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 07:47:40 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Good question!

Good question!

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 14:03:10 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Guitarpsichord

Guitarpsichord

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:21:43 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

harmonic "waste" and widened 5ths

harmonic "waste" and widened 5ths

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:07:28 -0700

61 lines

Re: harmonic "waste" and widened 5ths

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:52:57 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

Harmonische Abfall

Harmonische Abfall

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 08:47:46 +0200

65 lines

Re: Harmonische Abfall

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:40:05 +0100

78 lines

New Thread

HARPSICHORDS IN THE MEDIA

Re: HARPSICHORDS IN THE MEDIA

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:07:56 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Help Wanted with New Advent/Christmas Music

Help Wanted with New Advent/Christmas Music

Joyce, Brian D. Mr. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 09:22:38 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

Hildebrandt, again

Hildebrandt, again

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:02:02 -0400

23 lines

Re: Hildebrandt, again

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:19:50 +0200

59 lines

Re: Hildebrandt, again

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 10:13:48 -0400

85 lines

New Thread

Ho-hum, music again! (What?!) flexible Just intonation

Ho-hum, music again! (What?!) flexible Just intonation

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:40:22 +0200

85 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception

Re: HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 23:26:49 -0400

87 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 08:45:31 +0200

122 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:45:42 +0200

49 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:34:10 -0400

114 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 18:29:16 -0400

63 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Difference tone perception

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 15:44:22 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style

Re: HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Aug 2009 00:46:16 -0500

90 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style (Forgot Paul McCartney)

Re: HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style (Forgot Paul McCartney)

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 21:28:37 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style (synth strings vs real strings)

Re: HPSCHD-L Fugues written in the old style (synth strings vs real strings)

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Aug 2009 01:32:27 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent

Re: HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Aug 2009 21:32:21 -0500

26 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 04:04:47 -0500

44 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 07:00:50 EDT

33 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 11:07:33 -0500

44 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 22:39:03 -0700

45 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Harpsichord music for Lent

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 00:32:33 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

Re: HPSCHD-L I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 00:37:52 -0400

50 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:40:05 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L I'm sure this is [not] a stupid question. . .

Re: HPSCHD-L I'm sure this is [not] a stupid question. . .

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:58:29 -0400

64 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Kirckman pitch level - Tuning fork A

Re: HPSCHD-L Kirckman pitch level - Tuning fork A

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Aug 2009 22:39:42 -0400

55 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Kirckman pitch level - Tuning fork A

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:06:40 +0200

71 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Kirckman pitch level - Tuning fork A

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:48:06 +0100

99 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Michael Jackson

Re: HPSCHD-L Michael Jackson

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Aug 2009 22:10:52 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L not a page-turner

Re: HPSCHD-L not a page-turner

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:41:01 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L slightly OT rant about copyright

Re: HPSCHD-L slightly OT rant about copyright

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 17:56:42 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception

Re: HPSCHD-L Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 15:29:16 -0400

98 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26

Re: HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Aug 2009 09:50:57 -0700

177 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26***seriously off-topic***

Re: HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26***seriously off-topic***

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 16:37:15 -0400

45 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26***seriously off-topic***

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:34:25 -0400

39 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Various: June 25-26***seriously off-topic***

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 01:13:22 -0400

59 lines

New Thread

I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 00:12:07 -0400

37 lines

Re: I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:17:03 -0400

33 lines

Re: I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:26:48 +0100

41 lines

Re: I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:15:16 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .no it is not

Re: I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .no it is not

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 15:41:49 +0100

49 lines

Re: I'm sure this is a stupid question. . .no it is not

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 17:02:33 +0100

45 lines

New Thread

il pino domestico was bending pine

il pino domestico was bending pine

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 12:39:54 +0200

40 lines

Re: il pino domestico was bending pine

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 00:58:54 +0200

75 lines

New Thread

Instruments as envelopes

Instruments as envelopes

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 11:50:43 -0700

56 lines

Re: Instruments as envelopes

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 19:28:06 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Instruments as penevoles

Re: Instruments as penevoles

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 22:05:49 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

jones-clayton spinet

jones-clayton spinet

Bianca Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 18:57:14 -0500

34 lines

Re: jones-clayton spinet

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 21:25:27 -0700

23 lines

Re: jones-clayton spinet

Bianca Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:49:37 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Kerfluffle

Kerfluffle

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:23:52 -0700

55 lines

New Thread

Kerstin Schwarz's Cristofori

Kerstin Schwarz's Cristofori

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 18:11:20 EDT

41 lines

New Thread

Lego Harpsichord

Lego Harpsichord

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:47:01 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

libraries - copying and photographing policies

libraries - copying and photographing policies

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 18:32:23 +0200

83 lines

Re: libraries - copying and photographing policies

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:42:30 -0500

85 lines

Re: libraries - copying and photographing policies

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 20:44:53 +0200

94 lines

Re: libraries - copying and photographing policies

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:02:24 +0200

39 lines

Re: libraries - copying and photographing policies

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:46:46 -0500

87 lines

Re: libraries - copying and photographing policies

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:56:59 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

lightning

lightning

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:10:35 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

List of topics

List of topics

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:34:22 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Listening to fortepianos

Listening to fortepianos

Jim Abraham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 21:39:29 -0400

28 lines

Re: Listening to fortepianos

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 15:56:28 +0200

32 lines

Re: Listening to fortepianos

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 21:27:09 +0100

34 lines

Re: Listening to fortepianos

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Aug 2009 07:36:46 +0200

52 lines

New Thread

Long Drawn Back and Forth arguement

Long Drawn Back and Forth arguement

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 07:49:05 -0700

26 lines

Re: Long Drawn Back and Forth arguement

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 14:18:04 -0400

34 lines

Re: Long Drawn Back and Forth arguement

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 23:36:35 EDT

27 lines

New Thread

Mark Kroll performance available in WGBH's archive

Mark Kroll performance available in WGBH's archive

Richard John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 18:24:26 -0500

24 lines

Mark Kroll performance available in WGBH's archive

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:49:50 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Mersenne/Chaumont

Mersenne/Chaumont

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:21:20 +0100

35 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:36:54 +0100

54 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:54:53 +0100

32 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:19:24 +0200

31 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:02:30 +0100

96 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 09:32:14 +0100

38 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:15:07 +0100

42 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:22:24 +0100

41 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 12:45:39 +0100

36 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 22:12:42 +0100

35 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:23:13 +0200

27 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:30:05 +0200

39 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:04:59 +0100

58 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:01:01 +0100

34 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 09:51:37 +0100

46 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 13:38:40 +0100

40 lines

Re: Mersenne/Chaumont

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 02:03:49 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

Chou Li-En <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:46:34 +0200

30 lines

Re: misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

Chou Li-En <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 10:49:09 +0200

23 lines

Re: misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

Richard John <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 16:12:18 -0500

46 lines

Re: misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

Chou Li-En <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:18:13 +0200

53 lines

Re: misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

Chou Li-En <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:59:32 +0200

35 lines

Re: misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 06:15:55 -0500

86 lines

Re: misinformation re. Fortepiano recordings

Chou Li-En <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 14:53:58 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

Mouse ear damper holes

Mouse ear damper holes

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 07:24:46 -0700

21 lines

Re: Mouse ear damper holes

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:11:22 +0100

40 lines

Re: Mouse ear damper holes

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 18:51:26 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Natural Wool Cloth

Natural Wool Cloth

Chuck G Lewis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 00:37:36 -0500

48 lines

Re: Natural Wool Cloth

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 17:10:46 +0100

39 lines

Re: Natural Wool Cloth

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 16:11:04 +0000

87 lines

Re: Natural Wool Cloth

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 20:15:01 +0200

25 lines

Re: Natural Wool Cloth

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 15:12:00 -0400

72 lines

Re: Natural Wool Cloth

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 19:57:44 -0500

40 lines

Re: Natural Wool Cloth

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 12:35:46 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

New Advent/Christmas Music

New Advent/Christmas Music

Joyce, Brian D. Mr. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 16:33:02 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

New Music....

New Music....

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 17:25:14 -0500

29 lines

Re: New Music....

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 29 Aug 2009 09:45:52 +0200

52 lines

New Thread

north american redwood

north american redwood

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 05:53:04 -0700

31 lines

Re: north american redwood

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:34:12 -0700

31 lines

Re: north american redwood

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 10:16:22 -0400

32 lines

Re: north american redwood

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 12:35:06 -0700

31 lines

Re: north american redwood

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 08:29:00 +0200

37 lines

Re: north american redwood

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 09:00:30 +0200

34 lines

Re: north american redwood

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:05:24 +0200

24 lines

Re: north american redwood

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 06:28:58 +0200

32 lines

Re: north american redwood

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 06:08:00 -0700

62 lines

New Thread

objection to the DW piano

objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 22:31:16 +0200

65 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Aug 2009 23:25:15 +0200

41 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 00:18:50 +0200

32 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 03:57:50 -0500

53 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 11:38:32 +0200

28 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 19:43:34 +1000

22 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:29:51 +0200

164 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 12:59:50 +0200

54 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:39:11 +0100

41 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 21:55:13 +0200

57 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:36:08 -0500

28 lines

Re: objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 00:44:19 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Offensive? NO LONGER

Re: Offensive? NO LONGER

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 16:42:33 +0100

76 lines

Re: Offensive? NO LONGER

Kenneth Bloomfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:41:32 -0700

99 lines

Re: Offensive? NO LONGER

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 13:29:23 -0400

44 lines

Re: Offensive? NO LONGER

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 11:56:11 -0700

56 lines

New Thread

Offensive? NO LONGER Happy now, guys?

Re: Offensive? NO LONGER Happy now, guys?

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:34:24 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

Offensive? was side damping and discourse and manners

Offensive? was side damping and discourse and manners

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 22:34:45 +1000

36 lines

New Thread

oral history was copper boilers

oral history was copper boilers

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 12:37:49 +0200

19 lines

New Thread

OT: the mystery quartet?

OT: the mystery quartet?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 13:04:07 +0100

23 lines

Re: OT: the mystery quartet?

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Aug 2009 08:45:30 -0600

52 lines

OT: the mystery quartet?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 20:24:30 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Owen Jorgensen's Death

Owen Jorgensen's Death

Penny Draper <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 20:11:42 -0400

33 lines

Re: Owen Jorgensen's Death

John Charles Francis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 16:03:03 +0200

39 lines

Re: Owen Jorgensen's Death

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:48:32 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

Owen Jorgensen's Death - OBITUAIRE

Re: Owen Jorgensen's Death - OBITUAIRE

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 11:58:22 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

P-wire update

P-wire update

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:32:23 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

pensée

pensée

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:21:07 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

pine bending conclusion

pine bending conclusion

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 23:55:18 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

pine species

pine species

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 23:47:25 +0200

57 lines

Re: pine species

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:42:37 -0400

56 lines

Re: pine species

Giulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:39:10 +0200

38 lines

Re: pine species

Giulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 11:52:37 +0200

25 lines

Re: pine species

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 08:13:31 -0400

64 lines

Re: pine species

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 09:43:39 -0400

46 lines

Re: pine species

Giulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Aug 2009 07:57:10 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Pinnock performance

Re: Pinnock performance

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 10:20:23 -0700

30 lines

Re: Pinnock performance

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Aug 2009 20:51:48 EDT

40 lines

Re: Pinnock performance

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 10:04:13 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

Pinnock stand

Pinnock stand

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 22:51:30 EDT

36 lines

New Thread

private: anybody near Southampton, uk?

private: anybody near Southampton, uk?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Aug 2009 03:42:46 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

QUOTING!!!

QUOTING!!!

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:34:29 -0500

33 lines

Re: QUOTING!!!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:52:06 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

reading comprehension was objection to the DW piano

reading comprehension was objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 13:57:20 +0200

41 lines

Re: reading comprehension was objection to the DW piano

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:24:42 +0200

85 lines

Re: reading comprehension was objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 14:51:28 +0200

42 lines

Re: reading comprehension was objection to the DW piano

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Aug 2009 21:27:31 +0100

56 lines

Re: reading comprehension was objection to the DW piano

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Aug 2009 01:43:43 +0200

45 lines

New Thread

refined vices, was Shameful

refined vices, was Shameful

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:35:29 +0200

43 lines

Re: refined vices, was Shameful

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:57:11 +0100

70 lines

Re: refined vices, was Shameful

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 23:30:06 +0200

63 lines

Re: refined vices, was Shameful

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 00:13:05 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Salieri's bad harpsichord

Salieri's bad harpsichord

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:38:43 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Salieri's bad harpsichord, veering off into other anecdotal stuff

Salieri's bad harpsichord, veering off into other anecdotal stuff

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 07:54:59 -0500

86 lines

Re: Salieri's bad harpsichord, veering off into other anecdotal stuff

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:13:48 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti in Sethares' book

Scarlatti in Sethares' book

Chou Li-En <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:16:06 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti in Sethares' book-temperament

Re: Scarlatti in Sethares' book-temperament

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 11:10:28 +0100

40 lines

Re: Scarlatti in Sethares' book-temperament

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 08:57:18 -0600

84 lines

New Thread

Sethares' book

Sethares' book

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 12:39:22 -0600

27 lines

Re: Sethares' book

Chou Li-En <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Aug 2009 00:27:08 +0200

35 lines

Re: Sethares' book

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 18:48:27 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

shame

shame

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 03:39:00 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Shameful

Shameful

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:09:50 -0700

76 lines

Re: Shameful

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 08:26:00 +0100

58 lines

Re: Shameful

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 21:48:55 +1000

45 lines

Re: Shameful

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 10:32:34 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Shameful [?]

Re: Shameful [?]

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 11:40:33 +0200

113 lines

New Thread

Sharps

Sharps

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:38:35 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

side damping and discourse and manners

side damping and discourse and manners

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 09:33:46 +0200

49 lines

Re: side damping and discourse and manners

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Aug 2009 10:03:17 +0100

67 lines

New Thread

Side-damping

Side-damping

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 14:18:13 -0400

36 lines

Re: Side-damping

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 16:34:23 -0700

29 lines

Re: Side-damping

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 20:10:16 -0500

73 lines

Re: Side-damping

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 07:36:03 -0400

28 lines

Re: Side-damping

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:24:35 +0100

61 lines

Re: Side-damping

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 13:45:45 +0100

64 lines

Re: Side-damping

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:19:51 -0400

28 lines

Re: Side-damping

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 15:46:25 +0100

48 lines

Re: Side-damping

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 10:48:39 -0400

49 lines

Re: Side-damping

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 16:20:49 +0100

49 lines

Re: Side-damping

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 17:06:47 +0100

49 lines

Re: Side-damping

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 19:28:17 +0100

38 lines

Re: Side-damping

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 20:16:14 +0100

99 lines

Re: Side-damping

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 06:39:16 +1000

27 lines

Re: Side-damping

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Aug 2009 22:58:22 +0100

58 lines

Re: Side-damping

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 09:56:03 -0400

85 lines

Re: Side-damping

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:46:59 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Side-damping and manners

Re: Side-damping and manners

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 10:45:21 +0100

39 lines

Re: Side-damping and manners

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Aug 2009 16:13:54 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

Taskin 1787

Taskin 1787

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 07:09:00 -0500

20 lines

Re: Taskin 1787

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Aug 2009 21:19:57 +0200

55 lines

New Thread

Temperament in nineteenth century Italian piano making

Temperament in nineteenth century Italian piano making

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 15:55:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: Temperament in nineteenth century Italian piano making

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 17:14:49 +0200

44 lines

Re: Temperament in nineteenth century Italian piano making

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Aug 2009 16:42:34 +0100

59 lines

Re: Temperament in nineteenth century Italian piano making

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Aug 2009 22:00:03 +0100

29 lines

Re: Temperament in nineteenth century Italian piano making

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 00:09:12 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

Temperament of the Donat clavichord, was Ton Koopman on a number of matters

Re: Temperament of the Donat clavichord, was Ton Koopman on a number of matters

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 19:05:29 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:33:21 +0200

132 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:21:22 EDT

21 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 16:52:13 -0400

33 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:14:29 -0500

27 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Aug 2009 23:56:35 +0100

58 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:24:21 +0200

26 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:56:14 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies is Paul

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies is Paul

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 00:26:15 +0100

106 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies is Paul

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 03:15:08 +0200

164 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies is Paul

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 07:32:10 +0200

32 lines

Re: The problem with modern temperament sources/studies is Paul

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 11:00:04 +0100

120 lines

Re: THE problem with modern temperament sources/studies is Paul

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Aug 2009 08:47:54 EDT

35 lines

New Thread

The thin white line

The thin white line

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 09:36:58 +0100

41 lines

Re: The thin white line

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:05:14 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Ton Koopman and TRANSLATION

Ton Koopman and TRANSLATION

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:54:28 EDT

41 lines

Re: Ton Koopman and TRANSLATION

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:04:53 +0100

36 lines

Re: Ton Koopman and TRANSLATION

Maria Rose <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:44:21 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

Ton Koopman on a number of matters

Ton Koopman on a number of matters

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 16:32:52 +0200

88 lines

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:56:00 -0400

34 lines

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 10:15:17 -0500

44 lines

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:25:38 +0200

58 lines

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:53:02 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Ton Koopman on a number of matters and TRANSLATION

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters and TRANSLATION

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:06:31 +0200

61 lines

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters and TRANSLATION

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:38:21 +0100

36 lines

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters and TRANSLATION

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 22:23:27 +0200

138 lines

Re: Ton Koopman on a number of matters and TRANSLATION

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 21:45:19 +0200

63 lines

New Thread

Trying to think constructively about this List

Trying to think constructively about this List

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 20:55:33 -0700

240 lines

Re: Trying to think constructively about this List

Barry Evans <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:46:45 EDT

40 lines

Re: Trying to think constructively about this List

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 09:47:18 -0500

33 lines

Trying to think constructively about this List

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 11:54:21 EDT

39 lines

Re: Trying to think constructively about this List

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 14:04:41 -0500

32 lines

Trying to think constructively about this List

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 22:34:48 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Unharmonischer Abfall

Unharmonischer Abfall

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 00:48:00 +0100

77 lines

Re: Unharmonischer Abfall

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 07:56:21 +0200

99 lines

Re: Unharmonischer Abfall

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 30 Aug 2009 19:10:05 +0200

35 lines

Re: Unharmonischer Abfall

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 08:48:50 +0200

53 lines

Unharmonischer Abfall

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 10:52:47 +0100

35 lines

Re: Unharmonischer Abfall

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 19:53:06 +0200

43 lines

Re: Unharmonischer Abfall

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 20:35:48 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Unmeasured preludes

Unmeasured preludes

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 13:46:05 -0400

37 lines

Re: Unmeasured preludes

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 12:16:14 -0700

26 lines

Re: Unmeasured preludes

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 14:40:57 -0500

76 lines

Re: Unmeasured preludes

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Aug 2009 16:09:26 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Vallotti,/Young, brave Injuns, and assorted vegetable products

Vallotti,/Young, brave Injuns, and assorted vegetable products

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Aug 2009 16:38:33 +0200

342 lines

New Thread

Variable intonation

Variable intonation

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 08:55:04 -0600

54 lines

New Thread

Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception

Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 14:19:04 +0100

60 lines

Re: Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 13:56:07 +0000

34 lines

Re: Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 17:10:48 +0200

93 lines

Re: Variable intonation, was Difference tone perception

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 23:18:04 +0200

130 lines

New Thread

Vaudry recording

Vaudry recording

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 15 Aug 2009 14:07:15 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

verte cito - not a page-turner?

verte cito - not a page-turner?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:08:58 +0200

78 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 11:57:31 -0400

59 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:03:14 +0200

39 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 18:30:23 +0200

107 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:16:47 -0400

73 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 12:29:15 -0500

89 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:57:34 -0400

58 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 13:34:53 -0500

39 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 21:28:50 +0200

54 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 15:53:50 -0500

45 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 17:40:48 -0400

119 lines

Re: verte cito - not a page-turner?

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Aug 2009 23:08:48 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Virtual Morphology (was Food for Thought)

Virtual Morphology (was Food for Thought)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 07:25:51 +0200

66 lines

Re: Virtual Morphology (was Food for Thought)

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 12:18:35 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Which QUI PASSE?

Which QUI PASSE?

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Aug 2009 21:14:47 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

who is a troll, was food for...

who is a troll, was food for...

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Aug 2009 06:05:02 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Who's got FoMRHI?

Who's got FoMRHI?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Aug 2009 15:33:58 +0200

24 lines

Re: Who's got FoMRHI?

Dr. Brian Blood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Aug 2009 17:07:03 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Workshop "Il canto dei martelli" Making hammers sing con Christopher Clarke

Workshop "Il canto dei martelli" Making hammers sing con Christopher Clarke

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Aug 2009 20:49:54 +0200

82 lines

New Thread

WTCII - wrong notes?

WTCII - wrong notes?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 31 Aug 2009 23:46:47 +0100

37 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu