LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


April 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

18 foot piano (5 messages)
3 manual harpsichord (1 message)
4/4 gigues (was inegalite, Leonhardt) (1 message)
Administrative - ALL READ (2 messages)
Aline dAmbricourt's Scarlatti Documentary (2 messages)
American beech (1 message)
ancient treatises (1 message)
ancient treatises on the art of thump (7 messages)
And again... (1 message)
Anden Houben (2 messages)
Another test (1 message)
ANOTHER TEST MESSAGE (1 message)
Answered Question (2 messages)
April 17th Concert (1 message)
Boalch WAS Hass (and Haas) (1 message)
Boston Early Music Festival keyboard days (1 message)
Bridges and hitchpin rails (2 messages)
Buff (8 messages)
buff attributes (1 message)
Buff now Richters (3 messages)
buff stops (17 messages)
Buff stops again (1 message)
buff stops-Sample (1 message)
Buffs (2 messages)
catching up (1 message)
Delin was Hass (1 message)
Diane Hubbard (1 message)
Equal twenty (2 messages)
Fallboard (1 message)
fallboards (16 messages)
first off (3 messages)
For Handel Fans (1 message)
Fw: Re: PBWiki Update (1 message)
Fwd: HPSCHD-L: confirmation required (855C799E) (1 message)
Get command?? (1 message)
Hammers for cup bells (1 message)
Handel's financial acumen (1 message)
Hass (and Haas) (4 messages)
helmed pedestrians (2 messages)
Historical Wind Pitch Evaluation Study (3 messages)
hot dry bending (1 message)
HPSCHD-L changeover - ALL READ!! (3 messages)
HPSCHD-L confirmation required (855C799E) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Apr 2009 to 10 Apr 2009 (#2009-3) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Enrgy (NOT Taskin bridges) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L getting what you paid for (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Inegalite (was points deducted for Leonhardt) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Mass production (8 messages)
HPSCHD-L: confirmation required (855C799E) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L: Guidelines for Posting (ALL READ) (1 message)
In medium stat virtus (2 messages)
Inegalite (was ... Leonhardt) (5 messages)
Is the buff stop a vulgar thing? (15 messages)
Leonhardt on YouTube (2 messages)
List Archives (3 messages)
List Changeover - all read (1 message)
maiden post (1 message)
Mass production (4 messages)
Measuring antiques (5 messages)
Methodical tuning (3 messages)
Music library for sale (1 message)
new features (1 message)
new features disparaged (2 messages)
Old HIP (1 message)
One more thing... (2 messages)
ordinary, was Outrageous (1 message)
out of tune (7 messages)
Out of tune - understanding the causes (1 message)
Outrageous! (7 messages)
Outrageous! now Hass (2 messages)
PBWiki Update (5 messages)
Pedal harpsichord recording wanted (2 messages)
Performance and Baroque manners (1 message)
Peter Tkash (1 message)
Playing with a fallboard (1 message)
points deducted for Leonhardt (3 messages)
Portuguese Keyboard Instruments (5 messages)
Problem fixed (2 messages)
Push Coupler (2 messages)
Question -- definitely Off Topic ... (2 messages)
RE SCARLATTI & 2x8's (1 message)
really enjoyed this series of 6 Scott Ross (3 messages)
Ruckers Book (6 messages)
slightly rambling BBC story on Handel's financial acumen (1 message)
Spanish harpsichord music of the seventeenth century. (2 messages)
Spelling of Kirkman (2 messages)
Sperrhake jacks? (1 message)
string length calculator (3 messages)
successful approval (3 messages)
Taskin bridges: bent or sawn? (18 messages)
test (5 messages)
test e-mail (1 message)
TEST MESSAGE (7 messages)
TEST MESSAGE - IGNORE (1 message)
TEST MESSAGE.....PLEASE IGNORE & THANK YOU (1 message)
test metapost, please ignore (1 message)
Test. Please ignore. (1 message)
the mote and the beam (2 messages)
This is my maiden test (6 messages)
This is my maiden test (mine to) (1 message)
webby-ness (2 messages)
what the sérinette teaches (1 message)
what the sérinette teaches (and who) (1 message)
Yamanashi contest & Asian harpsichord maintenance tour (1 message)
Yet another test (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

New Thread

18 foot piano

Re: 18 foot piano

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 16:47:48 -0400

20 lines

Re: 18 foot piano

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 15:41:59 -0500

40 lines

Re: 18 foot piano

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 20:54:02 +0200

52 lines

Re: 18 foot piano

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 13:54:32 -0400

46 lines

18 foot piano

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 10:42:00 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

3 manual harpsichord

Re: 3 manual harpsichord

dragons <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:22:34 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

4/4 gigues (was inegalite, Leonhardt)

4/4 gigues (was inegalite, Leonhardt)

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:49:33 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Administrative - ALL READ

Re: Administrative - ALL READ

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:07:27 -0500

44 lines

Administrative - ALL READ

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:51:30 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Aline dAmbricourt's Scarlatti Documentary

Re: Aline dAmbricourt's Scarlatti Documentary

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 12:05:38 -0400

26 lines

Aline dAmbricourt's Scarlatti Documentary

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 02:15:14 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

American beech

American beech

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 12:22:15 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

ancient treatises

Re: ancient treatises

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 01:10:36 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

ancient treatises on the art of thump

Re: ancient treatises on the art of thump

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:49:32 -0700

25 lines

Re: ancient treatises on the art of thump

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:36:41 -0400

68 lines

Re: ancient treatises on the art of thump

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:27:21 +0100

107 lines

Re: ancient treatises on the art of thump

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 08:58:51 +0200

31 lines

Re: ancient treatises on the art of thump

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:43:52 -0400

36 lines

Re: ancient treatises on the art of thump

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:28:05 +0100

114 lines

ancient treatises on the art of thump

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 00:01:04 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

And again...

And again...

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:41:47 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Anden Houben

Re: Anden Houben

Patrick Frye <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:01:02 -0700

27 lines

Anden Houben

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 11:59:40 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

Another test

Another test

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:26:14 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

ANOTHER TEST MESSAGE

ANOTHER TEST MESSAGE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:34:23 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Answered Question

Re: Answered Question

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:52:39 +0200

65 lines

Answered Question

pablo sabat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 12:19:27 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

April 17th Concert

April 17th Concert

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 01:06:38 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Boalch WAS Hass (and Haas)

Boalch WAS Hass (and Haas)

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:26:44 +1000

33 lines

New Thread

Boston Early Music Festival keyboard days

Boston Early Music Festival keyboard days

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:54:31 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Bridges and hitchpin rails

Re: Bridges and hitchpin rails

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:31:52 -0400

34 lines

Bridges and hitchpin rails

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:06:59 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

Buff

Re: Buff

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:31:11 +0200

58 lines

Re: Buff

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:24:40 +0100

34 lines

Re: Buff

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 07:27:26 +0200

57 lines

Re: Buff

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 09:45:59 -0500

33 lines

Re: Buff

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 05:39:58 -0700

34 lines

Re: Buff

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 16:39:37 +0200

44 lines

Re: Buff

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 18:47:03 -0500

33 lines

Buff

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 19:05:37 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

buff attributes

buff attributes

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:36:23 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Buff now Richters

Re: Buff now Richters

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 19:20:49 +0200

52 lines

Re: Buff now Richters

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 10:14:49 -0500

31 lines

Re: Buff now Richters

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:21:11 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

buff stops

Re: buff stops

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:13:20 +0100

64 lines

Re: buff stops

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:18:59 +0100

47 lines

Re: buff stops

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:55:59 -0500

30 lines

Re: buff stops

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 18:55:09 -0500

34 lines

Re: buff stops

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:24:56 +0100

67 lines

Re: buff stops

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:37:08 +0200

47 lines

Re: buff stops

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:46:45 -0500

33 lines

Re: buff stops

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:25:51 +0100

46 lines

Re: buff stops

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:22:35 +0100

58 lines

Re: buff stops

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 16:03:28 -0500

31 lines

Re: buff stops

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:48:39 -0700

44 lines

Re: buff stops

Patrick Frye <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 03:50:36 -0700

31 lines

Re: buff stops

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 10:42:52 +0100

52 lines

Re: buff stops

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:35:55 -0700

49 lines

Re: Buff stops

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 10:37:00 +0200

89 lines

buff stops

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:51:52 -0700

59 lines

Buff stops

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 10:49:12 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Buff stops again

Re: Buff stops again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 07:58:35 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

buff stops-Sample

Re: buff stops-Sample

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:07:28 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Buffs

Re: Buffs

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:12:05 +0100

69 lines

Buffs

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:19:29 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

catching up

catching up

Martin Puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:14:50 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

Delin was Hass

Delin was Hass

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:58:52 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

Diane Hubbard

Diane Hubbard

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 21:50:19 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Equal twenty

Re: Equal twenty

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 09:52:52 -0400

58 lines

Equal twenty

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 03:51:08 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Fallboard

Fallboard

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:40:54 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

fallboards

Re: fallboards

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:24:25 -0700

28 lines

Re: fallboards

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 14:06:26 -0500

51 lines

Re: fallboards

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 11:30:40 -0500

50 lines

Re: fallboards

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 12:55:24 +0200

37 lines

fallboards

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:02:03 +0200

41 lines

Re: fallboards

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 09:11:14 +0200

38 lines

Re: fallboards

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:26:12 +0100

48 lines

Re: fallboards

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 08:18:02 +0200

27 lines

Re: fallboards

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 07:12:07 +0100

34 lines

Re: fallboards

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:11:32 +1000

62 lines

Re: fallboards

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:49:59 -0400

52 lines

Re: fallboards

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:35:05 -0400

24 lines

Re: fallboards

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 08:38:21 -0700

28 lines

Re: fallboards

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 15:01:12 +0200

28 lines

Re: fallboards

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 14:42:58 +0200

26 lines

fallboards

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 12:43:38 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

first off

Re: first off

Thomas Erlebach Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 11:21:48 -0500

27 lines

Re: first off

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:57:52 +0200

45 lines

first off

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:32:14 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

For Handel Fans

For Handel Fans

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 13:57:03 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: PBWiki Update

Fw: Re: PBWiki Update

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:13:30 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Fwd: HPSCHD-L: confirmation required (855C799E)

Fwd: HPSCHD-L: confirmation required (855C799E)

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:04:31 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Get command??

Get command??

Hugh Aston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:11:40 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

Hammers for cup bells

Hammers for cup bells

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:38:41 GMT

84 lines

New Thread

Handel's financial acumen

Re: Handel's financial acumen

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 15:58:42 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Hass (and Haas)

Re: Hass (and Haas)

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:26:53 +0100

32 lines

Re: Hass (and Haas)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:54:37 +0200

62 lines

Re: Hass (and Haas)

Patrick Frye <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:43:51 -0700

27 lines

Hass (and Haas)

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 22:57:38 -0700

142 lines

New Thread

helmed pedestrians

Re: helmed pedestrians

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:36:33 +0100

44 lines

helmed pedestrians

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:49:09 +0200

19 lines

New Thread

Historical Wind Pitch Evaluation Study

Re: Historical Wind Pitch Evaluation Study

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 22:17:34 +0200

31 lines

Re: Historical Wind Pitch Evaluation Study

Peter Chellew <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:45:27 -0400

48 lines

Historical Wind Pitch Evaluation Study

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 20:25:45 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

hot dry bending

hot dry bending

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:15:48 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L changeover - ALL READ!!

Re: HPSCHD-L changeover - ALL READ!!

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:31:17 -0500

23 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L changeover - ALL READ!!

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:26:23 -0400

128 lines

HPSCHD-L changeover - ALL READ!!

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:01:46 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L confirmation required (855C799E)

Re: HPSCHD-L confirmation required (855C799E)

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 03:49:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L confirmation required (855C799E)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:50:01 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Apr 2009 to 10 Apr 2009 (#2009-3)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Apr 2009 to 10 Apr 2009 (#2009-3)

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:24:45 -0700

62 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Enrgy (NOT Taskin bridges)

Re: HPSCHD-L Enrgy (NOT Taskin bridges)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 17:31:41 -0400

113 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L getting what you paid for

Re: HPSCHD-L getting what you paid for

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:04:50 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Inegalite (was points deducted for Leonhardt)

Re: HPSCHD-L Inegalite (was points deducted for Leonhardt)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:37:17 -0400

99 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Mass production

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 17:35:45 -0700

27 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:35:43 +0100

47 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 09:38:55 +0200

60 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:19:50 -0400

57 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:21:12 +0200

26 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:45:00 +0100

48 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 10:20:25 -0400

48 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Mass production

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 00:35:47 -0400

85 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L: confirmation required (855C799E)

Re: HPSCHD-L: confirmation required (855C799E)

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:14:48 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L: Guidelines for Posting (ALL READ)

HPSCHD-L: Guidelines for Posting (ALL READ)

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 13:07:32 -0500

177 lines

New Thread

In medium stat virtus

Re: In medium stat virtus

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 19:56:56 +0200

28 lines

In medium stat virtus

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 14:47:29 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

Inegalite (was ... Leonhardt)

Re: Inegalite (was ... Leonhardt)

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 08:17:50 +0200

23 lines

Re: Inegalite (was ... Leonhardt)

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 22:54:46 +0100

42 lines

Re: Inegalite (was ... Leonhardt)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 16:31:09 -0500

49 lines

Re: Inegalite (was ... Leonhardt)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 21:09:11 +0100

68 lines

Re: Inegalite (was ... Leonhardt)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 03:40:12 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 01:47:15 -0400

31 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:25:10 -0400

46 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Patrick Frye <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 17:08:10 -0700

31 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 14:33:37 -0400

36 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:29:37 -0500

40 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 16:50:15 +0100

42 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 11:29:51 +0200

34 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Larry Kent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 08:52:53 -0400

35 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:23:00 -0500

36 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Larry Kent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 07:55:22 -0400

74 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 06:04:09 -0400

72 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 04:02:40 -0500

73 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:37:35 -0700

62 lines

Re: Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 23:02:56 -0400

79 lines

Is the buff stop a vulgar thing?

Nicholas Good <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 21:38:35 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Leonhardt on YouTube

Re: Leonhardt on YouTube

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 14:46:29 +0100

52 lines

Leonhardt on YouTube

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 00:03:33 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

List Archives

Re: List Archives

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:38:48 -0400

18 lines

Re: List Archives

D M <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 15:40:42 -0500

46 lines

List Archives

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:37:46 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

List Changeover - all read

List Changeover - all read

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:28:22 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

maiden post

maiden post

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 00:45:17 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

Mass production

Re: Mass production

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 02:03:19 +0200

62 lines

Re: Mass production

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 19:10:37 -0400

54 lines

Re: Mass production

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 21:13:15 +0200

114 lines

Mass production

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 10:59:44 -0400

62 lines

New Thread

Measuring antiques

Re: Measuring antiques

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 09:37:19 -0400

59 lines

Re: Measuring antiques

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 07:52:00 -0500

45 lines

Re: Measuring antiques

Eleanor Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 13:07:25 +0100

47 lines

Measuring antiques

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 12:58:52 +0100

29 lines

Measuring antiques

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:27:54 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Methodical tuning

Re: Methodical tuning

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 16:20:13 +0100

30 lines

Re: Methodical tuning

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 15:32:54 +0100

37 lines

Methodical tuning

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 06:53:29 -0700

108 lines

New Thread

Music library for sale

Music library for sale

Richard Birney-Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 22:54:58 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

new features

new features

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:20:35 +0200

113 lines

New Thread

new features disparaged

Re: new features disparaged

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:43:47 +0200

55 lines

new features disparaged

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 18:13:24 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

Old HIP

Old HIP

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 10:17:22 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

One more thing...

Re: One more thing...

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:53:30 -0400

39 lines

One more thing...

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:47:16 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

ordinary, was Outrageous

ordinary, was Outrageous

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 22:06:31 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

out of tune

Re: out of tune

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 20:19:27 -0500

35 lines

Re: out of tune

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Apr 2009 00:38:14 -0700

26 lines

Re: out of tune

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:40:30 -0400

63 lines

Re: out of tune

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:56:11 +0100

40 lines

Re: out of tune

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 02:16:56 -0500

33 lines

Re: out of tune

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Apr 2009 08:56:05 +0200

71 lines

out of tune

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 22:12:01 -0700

39 lines

New Thread

Out of tune - understanding the causes

Out of tune - understanding the causes

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Apr 2009 10:36:26 +0200

198 lines

New Thread

Outrageous!

Re: Outrageous!

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 15:49:57 -0400

28 lines

Re: Outrageous!

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 11:09:39 -0400

40 lines

Re: Outrageous!

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 18:12:34 +1000

33 lines

Re: Outrageous!

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 07:13:19 +0200

74 lines

Re: Outrageous!

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 23:28:04 -0400

46 lines

Re: Outrageous!

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 12:25:53 +0930

42 lines

Outrageous!

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 21:16:58 +1000

23 lines

New Thread

Outrageous! now Hass

Re: Outrageous! now Hass

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 13:05:24 +0200

39 lines

Re: Outrageous! now Hass

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 02:02:34 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

PBWiki Update

Re: PBWiki Update

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 21:58:58 +0100

25 lines

Re: PBWiki Update

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 13:59:47 -0500

66 lines

Re: PBWiki Update

BEDersch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 09:52:38 -0700

40 lines

Re: PBWiki Update

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 11:49:24 -0500

45 lines

PBWiki Update

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 12:22:02 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Pedal harpsichord recording wanted

Re: Pedal harpsichord recording wanted

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 13:08:34 +0200

45 lines

Pedal harpsichord recording wanted

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 00:45:58 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Performance and Baroque manners

Performance and Baroque manners

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 18:22:27 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

Peter Tkash

Peter Tkash

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 14:16:34 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Playing with a fallboard

Playing with a fallboard

Karen Flint <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:46:34 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

points deducted for Leonhardt

Re: points deducted for Leonhardt

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 11:18:30 -0400

43 lines

points deducted for Leonhardt

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Apr 2009 20:06:28 +0100

63 lines

points deducted for Leonhardt

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Apr 2009 20:29:09 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

Portuguese Keyboard Instruments

Re: Portuguese Keyboard Instruments

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Apr 2009 01:56:50 +0100

41 lines

Re: Portuguese Keyboard Instruments

julio galvao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:57:20 +0000

54 lines

Re: Portuguese Keyboard Instruments

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 15:54:17 +0100

36 lines

Re: Portuguese Keyboard Instruments

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 20:27:09 +1000

42 lines

Portuguese Keyboard Instruments

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 20:13:06 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Problem fixed

Re: Problem fixed

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 20:52:42 -0400

27 lines

Problem fixed

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 17:20:07 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Push Coupler

Re: Push Coupler

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 10:03:16 -0400

47 lines

Push Coupler

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:46:39 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Question -- definitely Off Topic ...

Re: Question -- definitely Off Topic ...

Peter Chellew <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 08:03:16 -0400

74 lines

Question -- definitely Off Topic ...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 00:37:35 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

RE SCARLATTI & 2x8's

RE SCARLATTI & 2x8's

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 27 Apr 2009 09:35:56 EDT

47 lines

New Thread

really enjoyed this series of 6 Scott Ross

Re: really enjoyed this series of 6 Scott Ross

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:53:23 +0100

29 lines

Re: really enjoyed this series of 6 Scott Ross

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 21:19:50 +1000

41 lines

really enjoyed this series of 6 Scott Ross

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 20:40:20 +1000

22 lines

New Thread

Ruckers Book

Re: Ruckers Book

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Apr 2009 11:27:16 +0200

22 lines

Re: Ruckers Book

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 21:54:20 -0400

33 lines

Re: Ruckers Book

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 18:04:23 -0400

26 lines

Re: Ruckers Book

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:00:45 -0400

18 lines

Re: Ruckers Book

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:58:14 -0400

18 lines

Ruckers Book

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 16:43:40 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

slightly rambling BBC story on Handel's financial acumen

slightly rambling BBC story on Handel's financial acumen

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 08:51:57 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Spanish harpsichord music of the seventeenth century.

Re: Spanish harpsichord music of the seventeenth century.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 11:10:56 +0100

50 lines

Spanish harpsichord music of the seventeenth century.

Ron Zamir <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Apr 2009 05:32:49 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Spelling of Kirkman

Re: Spelling of Kirkman

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 17:21:40 -0400

39 lines

Spelling of Kirkman

Karen Flint <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Apr 2009 15:42:02 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Sperrhake jacks?

Sperrhake jacks?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 14:15:52 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

string length calculator

Re: string length calculator

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 22:35:44 -0500

32 lines

Re: string length calculator

David Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 11:53:22 -0700

47 lines

string length calculator

McKenna <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Apr 2009 14:05:33 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

successful approval

Re: successful approval

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 17:16:32 -0500

43 lines

Re: successful approval

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:46:43 -0500

30 lines

successful approval

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 15:52:08 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Apr 2009 09:09:06 +0200

37 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 21:18:22 -0500

22 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:40:19 +0200

32 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:19:11 +0200

47 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:46:30 -0400

65 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 23:08:08 +0200

23 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 16:43:53 -0400

53 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:51:19 -0400

88 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 22:20:12 +0200

32 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 15:09:36 -0400

22 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 19:33:36 +0200

24 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

McKenna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 13:12:26 -0400

25 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 17:06:56 +0200

27 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 09:10:21 -0400

58 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 06:04:44 -0700

28 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 11:12:11 +0200

35 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 08:19:55 +0200

74 lines

Re: Taskin bridges: bent or sawn?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 05:34:55 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

test

test

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 23:49:56 -0500

17 lines

test

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Apr 2009 13:42:00 +0200

18 lines

test

Stephen E Kabat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Apr 2009 09:10:42 -0400

22 lines

Re: test

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 16:46:07 -0400

18 lines

test

David Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Apr 2009 07:27:50 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

test e-mail

test e-mail

Patrick Frye <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:23:06 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

TEST MESSAGE

Re: TEST MESSAGE

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:13:17 -0400

30 lines

Re: TEST MESSAGE

D M <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:03:01 -0500

97 lines

TEST MESSAGE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:15:56 -0500

27 lines

TEST MESSAGE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:08:47 -0500

25 lines

Re: TEST MESSAGE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:39:45 -0500

61 lines

Re: TEST MESSAGE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:37:43 -0500

27 lines

TEST MESSAGE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Apr 2009 12:36:33 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

TEST MESSAGE - IGNORE

TEST MESSAGE - IGNORE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 14:33:01 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

TEST MESSAGE.....PLEASE IGNORE & THANK YOU

TEST MESSAGE.....PLEASE IGNORE & THANK YOU

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 19:03:35 EDT

22 lines

New Thread

test metapost, please ignore

test metapost, please ignore

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 16:05:03 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Test. Please ignore.

Test. Please ignore.

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 15:25:22 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

the mote and the beam

Re: the mote and the beam

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 11:54:58 +0100

50 lines

the mote and the beam

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Apr 2009 07:58:21 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

This is my maiden test

Re: This is my maiden test

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 19:11:00 +0200

41 lines

Re: This is my maiden test

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:22:06 -0400

61 lines

Re: This is my maiden test

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 10:43:43 +0200

31 lines

Re: This is my maiden test

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:45:33 +0200

53 lines

Re: This is my maiden test

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 20:59:22 -0700

48 lines

This is my maiden test

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 10 Apr 2009 18:11:14 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

This is my maiden test (mine to)

Re: This is my maiden test (mine to)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 09:23:59 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

webby-ness

Re: webby-ness

Thomas Etheridge Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:58:16 -0500

27 lines

webby-ness

Thomas Ethelbart Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Apr 2009 11:50:55 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

what the sérinette teaches

what the sérinette teaches

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 09:58:27 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

what the sérinette teaches (and who)

Re: what the sérinette teaches (and who)

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Apr 2009 11:07:09 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

Yamanashi contest & Asian harpsichord maintenance tour

Yamanashi contest & Asian harpsichord maintenance tour

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Apr 2009 19:32:52 +1000

54 lines

New Thread

Yet another test

Yet another test

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Apr 2009 16:09:26 -0500

23 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu