LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


March 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

" that " theme tune (1 message)
"Scarlatti" fandango again (4 messages)
(not-)tilney edition (1 message)
2x8s V 1x8,1x4. (2 messages)
A heavy hammer (1 message)
A=415 = C=? (8 messages)
After By-pass progress report (2 messages)
another italian double (1 message)
another ornamented blacksmith (11 messages)
Arnaut van Zwolle: the full monty? (3 messages)
b**** this ** alive (2 messages)
Beech jacks (7 messages)
Birthday (6 messages)
Bottom boards (1 message)
burn this fekker alive (6 messages)
Cembalo zu verkaufen (1 message)
Cimbalo Piegatori (folding harpsichords)long but different (4 messages)
Clavichord IV (1 message)
clink clink (9 messages)
clink clink (Honking) (1 message)
contact cement &c (2 messages)
corvus was clink clink (1 message)
Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston- Stringing list (1 message)
crape myrtle (2 messages)
crape myrtle (jack material) (7 messages)
do you miss F# and G#? (14 messages)
Dulce Melos and music for tiny keyboards (3 messages)
Early Music Summer Course - Serrapetrona 2009 (1 message)
English harpsichords (3 messages)
english harpsichords - reprise (3 messages)
English style (2 messages)
Esfahani & Purcell (16 messages)
Esfahani, was forget Robert Hill (1 message)
florentine bracing (1 message)
for the defense (9 messages)
for the defense, now opinion (9 messages)
forget Robert Hill (7 messages)
forget Robert Hill--now Mahan Esfahani (1 message)
Fw: Bridge Mass (2 messages)
FW: wedding (1 message)
Fwd: Cembalo zu verkaufen (1 message)
GG/BB (6 messages)
grain direction in delrin (6 messages)
H.I. Biber/ Battalia (8 messages)
Handel Utube (3 messages)
Harpsichord for rent in the Bay Area (1 message)
Harpsichord for sale - this time in English (1 message)
Harpsichord help please. (2 messages)
Harpsichord help please... problem solved... thx (1 message)
Harpsichord in Leipzig (2 messages)
Harpsichord on e-Bay (2 messages)
Harpsichord Transport Device (5 messages)
historical process (1 message)
Hitting tuning pins with a hammer (3 messages)
horsechestnut (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Birthday (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Stage Placement question (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L what to play in a wedding if... (2 messages)
iPhone (4 messages)
iPhone and Cammerton (1 message)
Italian and Hubbard (1 message)
Italians in Omaha (2 messages)
Kit query (11 messages)
lawrence welk harpsichord id? (13 messages)
looking (1 message)
Mahan Esfahani (1 message)
meaning/meinung was meaninglessness (12 messages)
meaninglessness (2 messages)
Montreal Hpschd pix (4 messages)
Montreal pix, addition (3 messages)
Morley (7 messages)
Morley again (1 message)
moulding enigma (8 messages)
Musical event of interest (1 message)
Neue Bach Ausgabe Bach Dokumente VII (1 message)
Neuperts for Bach (4 messages)
Neuperts for Bach-2 (1 message)
New Book on German fortepiano manuals (5 messages)
New email address (1 message)
Non sequitur of the century? (5 messages)
Not sure how to subject this (7 messages)
Origin of species (1 message)
ornaments of purcell (3 messages)
Painted harpsichords (15 messages)
Painted harpsichords and harpsichrod floors (1 message)
patronising TD and thanking PB (1 message)
plans again (2 messages)
plectra (1 message)
prevoiced plectra (2 messages)
Prof. de Silva's book (1 message)
Program tonight (3 messages)
Ruckers 1594 - The Thing (5 messages)
Ruckers 1594 - The Thing--now Thalheim (1 message)
Ruckers 1594 Correction (1 message)
Save La Petite Bande ! (1 message)
scarlatti fandango (attributed) (1 message)
scientia, arte, the true quotation (13 messages)
scientia/arte (3 messages)
Signing on again (J. Peters Seattle) (5 messages)
Sized soundboard raised grain (9 messages)
Skowroneck one-man "Mietke" for sale (2 messages)
Sorry (1 message)
Still asleep late on Sunday morning (1 message)
Taskin close pairs (19 messages)
Temporary sign off (2 messages)
Thanks for the lullabies (1 message)
thanks, and another query (2 messages)
The Consort issue 16 (1 message)
The old masters (2 messages)
theorbo notes (4 messages)
thorn plectrum (1 message)
thorn plectrum: thorn scratched (7 messages)
Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25? (1 message)
tilney book (8 messages)
Tolerating a Clavichord (1 message)
tuning pins again (7 messages)
tuning pins... (18 messages)
Tunning Hammer (5 messages)
Tunning(sic) Hammer (4 messages)
Twist-turning technique book (5 messages)
UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENT - 2nd Revised Edition!! (1 message)
Various topics from the latest (2 messages)
wedding (16 messages)
Wedding Music -- Suggestion (2 messages)
what to play in a wedding if... (5 messages)
why extend compass? (2 messages)
why not copy english harpsichords (21 messages)
why not copy english harpsichords?? (6 messages)
Why why why? (2 messages)
William Dowd #48 for sale (2 messages)
Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device (8 messages)
ZELL PLANS (10 messages)
zen was Kits (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

" that " theme tune

Re: " that " theme tune

dragons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:25:29 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

"Scarlatti" fandango again

"Scarlatti" fandango again

Domenico Statuto - statuto.it <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:27:28 +0100

53 lines

Re: "Scarlatti" fandango again

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 08:37:17 +0000

29 lines

Re: "Scarlatti" fandango again

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:12:51 +0100

27 lines

Re: "Scarlatti" fandango again

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:35:30 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

(not-)tilney edition

(not-)tilney edition

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 21:34:04 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:40:25 +0000

34 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:52:47 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

A heavy hammer

A heavy hammer

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:34:59 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

A=415 = C=?

Re: A=415 = C=?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:08:53 +0100

41 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:43:55 +0000

33 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:04:10 +0100

49 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:13:49 -0000

26 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Frank_House?= <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 06:39:33 -0500

25 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:07:17 +0100

53 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:29:04 +0100

54 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:34:48 -0800

78 lines

New Thread

After By-pass progress report

After By-pass progress report

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 10:47:18 -0700

25 lines

Re: After By-pass progress report

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:39:06 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

another italian double

Re: another italian double

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:10:07 -0000

48 lines

New Thread

another ornamented blacksmith

another ornamented blacksmith

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 22:05:36 +0100

18 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:22:23 +1100

31 lines

another ornamented blacksmith

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:15:23 +0100

19 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 14:52:26 -0400

28 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:16:44 +0100

47 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:49:01 -0400

48 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:27:03 -0500

27 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:47:09 +0100

21 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 15:49:49 -0400

22 lines

Re: another ornamented blacksmith

Jordi Corall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 14:11:06 +0900

34 lines

another ornamented blacksmith

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 11:42:51 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Arnaut van Zwolle: the full monty?

Arnaut van Zwolle: the full monty?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:46:39 +0100

30 lines

Re: Arnaut van Zwolle: the full monty?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:15:35 -0000

25 lines

Re: Arnaut van Zwolle: the full monty?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 21:58:55 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

b**** this ** alive

Re: b**** this ** alive

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:38:12 +1100

13 lines

Re: b**** this ** alive

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:05:35 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Beech jacks

Beech jacks

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:18:12 -0500

49 lines

Re: Beech jacks

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 06:31:34 -0700

27 lines

Re: Beech jacks

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 17:33:50 +0100

44 lines

Re: Beech jacks

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:49:16 -0500

34 lines

Re: Beech jacks

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 20:30:27 -0700

36 lines

Re: Beech jacks

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:33:23 +0100

61 lines

Re: Beech jacks

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 23:48:53 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Birthday

Birthday

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 18:14:09 -0800

27 lines

Re: Birthday

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:56:39 -0800

15 lines

Re: Birthday

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 21:30:08 -0400

18 lines

Re: Birthday

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 22:25:52 -0400

24 lines

Re: Birthday

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:49:06 -0500

26 lines

Re: Birthday

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 07:02:52 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Bottom boards

Bottom boards

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 19:49:47 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

burn this fekker alive

burn this fekker alive

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:05:04 +1100

15 lines

Re: burn this fekker alive

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:20:38 +0000

28 lines

Re: burn this fekker alive

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:44:46 +0100

14 lines

Re: burn this fekker alive

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 09:48:06 -0400

22 lines

Re: burn this fekker alive

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:01:01 -0400

22 lines

Re: burn this fekker alive

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:17:41 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Cembalo zu verkaufen

Re: Cembalo zu verkaufen

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 08:04:12 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Cimbalo Piegatori (folding harpsichords)long but different

Cimbalo Piegatori (folding harpsichords)long but different

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:50:31 -0800

46 lines

Re: Cimbalo Piegatori (folding harpsichords)long but different

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:55:34 -0500

26 lines

Re: Cimbalo Piegatori (folding harpsichords)long but different

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:27:59 +0100

22 lines

Re: Cimbalo Piegatori (folding harpsichords)long but different

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:17:59 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Clavichord IV

Clavichord IV

Ray Ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:30:53 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

clink clink

Re: clink clink

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:23:13 -0500

29 lines

Re: clink clink

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:39:51 +1100

23 lines

Re: clink clink

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:03:21 -0600

42 lines

Re: clink clink

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 04:54:59 -0500

37 lines

Re: clink clink

martin spaink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 02:10:16 -0800

21 lines

Re: clink clink

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:10:04 -0000

28 lines

Re: clink clink

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 02:44:05 -0500

26 lines

clink clink

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:36:50 +0100

30 lines

Re: clink clink

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 07:15:05 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

clink clink (Honking)

Re: clink clink (Honking)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 08:54:57 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

contact cement &c

contact cement &c

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:46:38 +0100

27 lines

Re: contact cement &c

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:45:51 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

corvus was clink clink

corvus was clink clink

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:47:53 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston- Stringing list

Re: Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston- Stringing list

martin spaink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 03:45:25 -0800

16 lines

New Thread

crape myrtle

crape myrtle

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:12:18 -0500

53 lines

Re: crape myrtle

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:46:33 -0400

56 lines

New Thread

crape myrtle (jack material)

Re: crape myrtle (jack material)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:10:22 +0000

38 lines

Re: crape myrtle (jack material)

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 08:21:03 +0100

29 lines

Re: crape myrtle (jack material)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 07:32:24 +0000

25 lines

Re: crape myrtle (jack material)

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 12:58:33 -0400

34 lines

Re: crape myrtle (jack material)

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 13:11:58 -0400

18 lines

Re: crape myrtle (jack material)

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:40:11 -0400

38 lines

Re: crape myrtle (jack material)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 07:22:19 +0000

39 lines

New Thread

do you miss F# and G#?

do you miss F# and G#?

Hugh Aston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:30:54 -0400

26 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:14:30 -0400

47 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

Stanley E. Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:34:39 -0700

58 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:34:53 -0500

46 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 12:40:34 -0500

29 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 11:25:50 -0700

89 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:22:03 -0400

45 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:22:41 -0400

11 lines

do you miss F# and G#?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:31:24 +0000

40 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 21:49:08 +0100

17 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 16:56:37 -0400

22 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:43:57 -0700

37 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 23:00:56 -0500

38 lines

Re: do you miss F# and G#?

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Mar 2009 00:27:47 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

Dulce Melos and music for tiny keyboards

Dulce Melos and music for tiny keyboards

Robbie Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:14:55 -0500

40 lines

Re: Dulce Melos and music for tiny keyboards

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:38:10 -0800

53 lines

Re: Dulce Melos and music for tiny keyboards

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:49:10 -0000

32 lines

New Thread

Early Music Summer Course - Serrapetrona 2009

Early Music Summer Course - Serrapetrona 2009

Eva Schulze <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 19:28:36 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

English harpsichords

English harpsichords

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 22:15:39 -0000

26 lines

Re: English harpsichords

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:45:00 +1100

42 lines

English harpsichords

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 21:51:47 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

english harpsichords - reprise

english harpsichords - reprise

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:59:15 +0800

18 lines

Re: english harpsichords - reprise

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:41:25 +0100

16 lines

Re: english harpsichords - reprise

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:48:30 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

English style

English style

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 08:51:41 -0600

23 lines

Re: English style

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:22:54 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Esfahani & Purcell

Esfahani & Purcell

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:46:53 +0100

15 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 12:21:50 -0500

33 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:49:53 +0100

15 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 17:00:37 -0400

28 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:18:06 -0500

35 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 16:21:12 -0500

30 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:40:09 +0100

31 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 03:47:57 -0700

37 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 09:53:26 -0400

30 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 10:24:38 -0500

69 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 14:24:20 -0700

123 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:35:49 +0100

13 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 10:57:58 +0100

42 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:25:23 -0500

85 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:11:50 -0500

167 lines

Re: Esfahani & Purcell

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:00:38 -0400

79 lines

New Thread

Esfahani, was forget Robert Hill

Re: Esfahani, was forget Robert Hill

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 16:30:23 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

florentine bracing

florentine bracing

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:44:36 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

for the defense

for the defense

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 07:18:27 -0700

21 lines

Re: for the defense

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 15:34:54 +0000

43 lines

Re: for the defense

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:31:49 -0400

19 lines

Re: for the defense

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 21:19:16 +1100

27 lines

Re: for the defense

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:45:31 +0100

31 lines

Re: for the defense

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 13:55:57 +0100

50 lines

Re: for the defense

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:00:03 +0100

29 lines

Re: for the defense

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:04:20 +0100

17 lines

Re: for the defense

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 14:10:33 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

for the defense, now opinion

Re: for the defense, now opinion

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:14:36 -0400

27 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 10:52:26 -0700

28 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:23:01 +0000

30 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 22:05:35 +0100

29 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 18:35:00 -0400

32 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 20:53:26 -0700

30 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:51:24 +0100

21 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 04:15:57 -0400

27 lines

Re: for the defense, now opinion

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 07:33:01 EDT

22 lines

New Thread

forget Robert Hill

forget Robert Hill

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:07:21 +0100

15 lines

Re: forget Robert Hill

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:45:13 -0600

34 lines

Re: forget Robert Hill

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:17:47 -0000

39 lines

Re: forget Robert Hill

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:46:21 -0500

17 lines

Re: forget Robert Hill

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:59:44 -0600

33 lines

Re: forget Robert Hill

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 01:12:31 +0100

25 lines

Re: forget Robert Hill

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:28:07 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

forget Robert Hill--now Mahan Esfahani

Re: forget Robert Hill--now Mahan Esfahani

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:39:19 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Fw: Bridge Mass

Fw: Bridge Mass

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:50:38 -0800

33 lines

Re: Fw: Bridge Mass

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:16:14 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

FW: wedding

FW: wedding

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 18:07:34 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Cembalo zu verkaufen

Fwd: Cembalo zu verkaufen

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Mar 2009 12:31:37 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

GG/BB

GG/BB

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 02:20:51 +0100

29 lines

Re: GG/BB

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 05:43:14 +0100

18 lines

Re: GG/BB

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:20:33 -0500

28 lines

Re: GG/BB

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:53:31 +0100

17 lines

Re: GG/BB

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:39:14 +0800

36 lines

Re: GG/BB

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 14:50:57 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

grain direction in delrin

Re: grain direction in delrin

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:25:44 +0100

25 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:54:52 -0000

58 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 07:00:04 +0000

28 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:41:53 +0100

31 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 18:44:26 +0000

57 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:40:29 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

H.I. Biber/ Battalia

H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:53:40 -0400

19 lines

Re: H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 15:26:20 +0000

10 lines

Re: H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:04:38 +0100

16 lines

Re: H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:28:50 +0000

10 lines

Re: H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:33:23 -0400

32 lines

Re: H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:01:00 -0400

17 lines

Re: H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 18:16:49 -0400

31 lines

Re: H.I. Biber/ Battalia

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 07:31:15 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Handel Utube

Handel Utube

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:26:44 -0600

14 lines

Re: Handel Utube

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:33:58 +0100

29 lines

Re: Handel Utube

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:37:10 -0000

26 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord for rent in the Bay Area

Harpsichord for rent in the Bay Area

Lillian Gordis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 20:34:48 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord for sale - this time in English

Harpsichord for sale - this time in English

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 22:36:48 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord help please.

Harpsichord help please.

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 18:27:05 -0500

42 lines

Re: Harpsichord help please.

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 19:52:39 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord help please... problem solved... thx

Re: Harpsichord help please... problem solved... thx

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:38:22 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord in Leipzig

Harpsichord in Leipzig

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:03:38 -0400

16 lines

Re: Harpsichord in Leipzig

Fabrizio Acanfora <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 08:22:55 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord on e-Bay

Harpsichord on e-Bay

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 19:22:52 -0400

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord on e-Bay

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 16:44:13 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Transport Device

Harpsichord Transport Device

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 12:09:38 -0500

19 lines

Re: Harpsichord Transport Device

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 11:59:01 -0800

14 lines

Re: Harpsichord Transport Device

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 00:41:29 -0000

26 lines

Re: Harpsichord Transport Device

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 23:27:44 -0500

24 lines

Re: Harpsichord Transport Device

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:40:49 -0000

22 lines

New Thread

historical process

historical process

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 08:26:43 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Hitting tuning pins with a hammer

Hitting tuning pins with a hammer

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 17:48:09 -0500

42 lines

Re: Hitting tuning pins with a hammer

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:01:15 +0100

52 lines

Re: Hitting tuning pins with a hammer

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:27:00 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

horsechestnut

horsechestnut

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:31:25 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Birthday

Re: HPSCHD-L Birthday

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 01:10:12 -0400

48 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Stage Placement question

HPSCHD-L Stage Placement question

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 21:50:42 -0500

43 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Stage Placement question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 20:41:27 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L what to play in a wedding if...

Re: HPSCHD-L what to play in a wedding if...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:21:08 -0400

38 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L what to play in a wedding if...

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 21:37:20 -0700

57 lines

New Thread

iPhone

iPhone

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:27:13 -0400

31 lines

Re: iPhone

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:22:06 +0100

52 lines

Re: iPhone

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:14:47 +0200

18 lines

Re: iPhone

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 15:11:11 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

iPhone and Cammerton

Re: iPhone and Cammerton

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 23:26:05 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

Italian and Hubbard

Italian and Hubbard

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:25:36 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Italians in Omaha

Re: Italians in Omaha

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 09:01:55 -0800

44 lines

Re: Italians in Omaha

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:12:48 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Kit query

Kit query

Peter Chellew <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 18:41:40 -0400

26 lines

Re: Kit query

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:12:39 +1100

36 lines

Re: Kit query

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 06:33:29 -0400

23 lines

Re: Kit query

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 09:26:56 -0400

34 lines

Re: Kit query

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:21:50 +0100

21 lines

Re: Kit query

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:25:43 +0100

20 lines

Re: Kit query

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 15:26:51 +0100

15 lines

Re: Kit query

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 10:30:35 -0400

32 lines

Re: Kit query

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:53:48 -0400

50 lines

Re: Kit query

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:21:07 -0700

29 lines

Kit query

Peter Chellew <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:50:58 -0400

16 lines

New Thread

lawrence welk harpsichord id?

lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Jessica Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:29:36 -0500

23 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 01:29:54 -0500

30 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:54:31 -0500

35 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:54:35 -0600

23 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 02:37:53 -0500

46 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:27:09 -0500

56 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 14:46:57 -0500

22 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:01:24 -0500

18 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Mark Firley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:56:43 -0500

32 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:16:49 -0600

30 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:24:53 -0700

27 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

McKenna <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 11:51:03 -0500

20 lines

Re: lawrence welk harpsichord id?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:06:46 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

looking

looking

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 16:31:17 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Mahan Esfahani

Mahan Esfahani

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 00:36:01 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 02:04:28 +0100

50 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:25:42 +0100

35 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:59:05 +1100

34 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 12:59:19 +0100

23 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:01:41 -0400

17 lines

meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 16:12:25 +0100

45 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 11:33:06 -0400

15 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 19:04:37 -0400

28 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 23:27:07 -0500

25 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 03:13:22 -0400

16 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 20:28:20 +1100

30 lines

Re: meaning/meinung was meaninglessness

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 06:41:50 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

meaninglessness

meaninglessness

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 15:14:43 -0700

18 lines

Re: meaninglessness

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 06:23:49 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Montreal Hpschd pix

Montreal Hpschd pix

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Mar 2009 23:19:37 -0500

29 lines

Re: Montreal Hpschd pix

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 09:57:00 -0400

52 lines

Re: Montreal Hpschd pix

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:01:51 -0400

26 lines

Re: Montreal Hpschd pix

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 14:39:53 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Montreal pix, addition

Montreal pix, addition

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 17:59:59 -0500

21 lines

Re: Montreal pix, addition

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 07:04:08 +0000

44 lines

Re: Montreal pix, addition

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 14:43:10 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Morley

Morley

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 12:47:55 -0700

29 lines

Re: Morley

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 00:29:17 -0000

35 lines

Re: Morley

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Mar 2009 23:26:15 -0400

25 lines

Re: Morley

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:23:29 -0000

24 lines

Re: Morley

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 11:37:51 +0000

35 lines

Re: Morley

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 06:55:57 -0500

37 lines

Re: Morley

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 15:42:09 +1100

39 lines

New Thread

Morley again

Re: Morley again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 06:51:33 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

moulding enigma

moulding enigma

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 22:45:18 +0100

14 lines

Re: moulding enigma

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 14:52:50 -0700

25 lines

Re: moulding enigma

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 23:21:40 -0500

29 lines

Re: moulding enigma

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 04:46:21 -0700

21 lines

Re: moulding enigma

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:24:16 -0400

27 lines

Re: moulding enigma

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 13:40:54 +0100

16 lines

Re: moulding enigma

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:52:07 -0400

15 lines

Re: moulding enigma

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 21:19:47 +1100

30 lines

New Thread

Musical event of interest

Musical event of interest

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:21:08 -0600

16 lines

New Thread

Neue Bach Ausgabe Bach Dokumente VII

Neue Bach Ausgabe Bach Dokumente VII

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 13:43:15 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Neuperts for Bach

Neuperts for Bach

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 22:46:30 -0000

39 lines

Re: Neuperts for Bach

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 19:32:42 -0400

39 lines

Re: Neuperts for Bach

ng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 18:36:12 -0500

31 lines

Re: Neuperts for Bach

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 21:26:37 -0400

18 lines

New Thread

Neuperts for Bach-2

Re: Neuperts for Bach-2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 23:27:16 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

New Book on German fortepiano manuals

New Book on German fortepiano manuals

Preethi De Silva <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:49:17 -0800

36 lines

Re: New Book on German fortepiano manuals

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:28:14 -0000

45 lines

Re: New Book on German fortepiano manuals

Jos Raets <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:44:23 +0100

51 lines

Re: New Book on German fortepiano manuals

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:24:54 -0500

21 lines

Re: New Book on German fortepiano manuals

Dongsok Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:27:16 EST

52 lines

New Thread

New email address

New email address

Neil WALKER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 18:25:09 +1100

17 lines

New Thread

Non sequitur of the century?

Non sequitur of the century?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 13:14:48 +0100

24 lines

Re: Non sequitur of the century?

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:47:47 -0600

36 lines

Re: Non sequitur of the century?

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 09:07:35 -0800

36 lines

Re: Non sequitur of the century?

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 12:40:16 -0500

24 lines

Re: Non sequitur of the century?

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:27:30 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Not sure how to subject this

Not sure how to subject this

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 23:49:27 -0500

16 lines

Re: Not sure how to subject this

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 09:29:58 -0400

22 lines

Re: Not sure how to subject this

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:40:39 +0000

16 lines

Re: Not sure how to subject this

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:45:12 +0000

21 lines

Re: Not sure how to subject this

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 13:44:54 -0000

20 lines

Re: Not sure how to subject this

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 10:26:57 -0400

18 lines

Re: Not sure how to subject this

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 11:04:12 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Origin of species

Origin of species

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 09:09:39 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

ornaments of purcell

ornaments of purcell

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 13:25:34 -0700

22 lines

Re: ornaments of purcell

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 20:52:05 -0000

48 lines

Re: ornaments of purcell

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 17:00:18 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Painted harpsichords

Painted harpsichords

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:26:49 +0800

49 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 10:45:38 -0400

62 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 15:05:04 +0000

29 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 12:47:41 +0800

23 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 19:42:21 +0100

26 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 14:59:11 -0400

36 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 20:19:42 +0000

56 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 17:14:31 -0400

65 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Mar 2009 18:54:41 -0700

91 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 02:53:06 -0400

24 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:10:53 -0400

21 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 15:41:55 +0100

30 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 09:01:54 -0700

42 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 08:19:05 -0700

51 lines

Re: Painted harpsichords

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 10:27:09 -0700

75 lines

New Thread

Painted harpsichords and harpsichrod floors

Re: Painted harpsichords and harpsichrod floors

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 18:53:37 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

patronising TD and thanking PB

patronising TD and thanking PB

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:53:29 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

plans again

plans again

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 05:55:42 -0400

12 lines

Re: plans again

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 17:04:43 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

plectra

plectra

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 20:17:43 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

prevoiced plectra

prevoiced plectra

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Mar 2009 22:48:31 +0100

19 lines

Re: prevoiced plectra

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 09:54:20 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Prof. de Silva's book

Prof. de Silva's book

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:44:28 -0600

15 lines

New Thread

Program tonight

Program tonight

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 17:22:32 -0700

50 lines

Re: Program tonight

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Mar 2009 20:11:59 -0500

37 lines

Re: Program tonight

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Mar 2009 09:28:55 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Ruckers 1594 - The Thing

Ruckers 1594 - The Thing

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:18:53 +0000

18 lines

Re: Ruckers 1594 - The Thing

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:47:13 +0100

17 lines

Re: Ruckers 1594 - The Thing

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 13:54:28 -0700

17 lines

Re: Ruckers 1594 - The Thing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 23:31:06 -0500

34 lines

Re: Ruckers 1594 - The Thing

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 18:07:06 +1100

24 lines

New Thread

Ruckers 1594 - The Thing--now Thalheim

Re: Ruckers 1594 - The Thing--now Thalheim

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 18:13:26 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Ruckers 1594 Correction

Re: Ruckers 1594 Correction

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 14:37:20 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

Save La Petite Bande !

Save La Petite Bande !

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 06:26:25 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

scarlatti fandango (attributed)

scarlatti fandango (attributed)

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 04:38:21 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

scientia, arte, the true quotation

scientia, arte, the true quotation

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 20:41:34 +0100

33 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:08:21 -0000

38 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 15:48:47 -0700

54 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 00:14:28 +0100

26 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 16:50:25 -0700

37 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:52:29 -0000

26 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 18:56:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 01:43:16 +0100

29 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:23:06 -0500

23 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 23:55:29 -0500

28 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 10:04:29 -0000

32 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 16:54:14 +0100

26 lines

Re: scientia, arte, the true quotation

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:08:31 -0800

67 lines

New Thread

scientia/arte

scientia/arte

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 08:38:29 -0500

27 lines

Re: scientia/arte

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:34:34 -0500

18 lines

Re: scientia/arte

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 11:52:02 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Signing on again (J. Peters Seattle)

Signing on again (J. Peters Seattle)

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 09:42:52 -0700

19 lines

Re: Signing on again (J. Peters Seattle)

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 12:46:23 -0700

24 lines

Re: Signing on again (J. Peters Seattle)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 18:12:06 +0000

34 lines

Re: Signing on again (J. Peters Seattle)

Marc Paré <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:03:53 -0400

36 lines

Re: Signing on again (J. Peters Seattle)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:21:55 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Sized soundboard raised grain

Sized soundboard raised grain

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:23:34 -0500

17 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 18:51:13 +0100

31 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:21:06 -0500

30 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Willem Vangerberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:25:01 -0500

22 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:32:31 +0100

52 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 20:15:14 -0500

24 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:31:18 +0100

120 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:32:30 +0100

20 lines

Re: Sized soundboard raised grain

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:48:27 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Skowroneck one-man "Mietke" for sale

Skowroneck one-man "Mietke" for sale

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 14:54:00 -0400

18 lines

Re: Skowroneck one-man "Mietke" for sale

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Mar 2009 12:34:26 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Sorry

Sorry

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 09:18:54 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

Still asleep late on Sunday morning

Still asleep late on Sunday morning

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 10:55:25 -0000

14 lines

New Thread

Taskin close pairs

Taskin close pairs

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:35:43 -0400

18 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 20:57:48 -0700

51 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:14:18 +0200

22 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 09:53:16 +0100

51 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 12:44:20 +0200

25 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 13:22:15 +0100

50 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 10:10:13 -0500

34 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 07:28:51 -0700

60 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 20:44:54 +0200

21 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 07:17:33 +0100

60 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:25:47 +0200

25 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 08:43:03 +0200

20 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 09:56:48 +0100

44 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 11:17:57 +0200

16 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:06:53 +0200

19 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 13:20:17 +0100

43 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:31:57 +0200

16 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 19:03:20 +0100

49 lines

Re: Taskin close pairs

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Apr 2009 01:03:30 +0200

17 lines

New Thread

Temporary sign off

Temporary sign off

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 06:18:18 -0700

14 lines

Re: Temporary sign off

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 07:17:44 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Thanks for the lullabies

Thanks for the lullabies

meg irwin-brandon <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 22:25:24 -0300

13 lines

New Thread

thanks, and another query

thanks, and another query

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Mar 2009 20:31:09 -0400

44 lines

Re: thanks, and another query

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Mar 2009 03:42:52 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

The Consort issue 16

The Consort issue 16

Eleanor Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 13:23:35 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

The old masters

The old masters

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 16:34:01 +0100

45 lines

Re: The old masters

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 17:39:42 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

theorbo notes

theorbo notes

turpin ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 17:01:49 +0100

19 lines

Re: theorbo notes

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 19:43:00 +0100

19 lines

Re: theorbo notes

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 14:15:32 -0500

38 lines

Re: theorbo notes

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 21:44:35 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

thorn plectrum

thorn plectrum

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:36:17 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 17:56:13 +0100

29 lines

Re: thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Mar 2009 15:43:08 -0500

19 lines

Re: thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 01:09:23 +0100

18 lines

Re: thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 03:10:12 +0100

21 lines

Re: thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 06:34:02 +0100

28 lines

Re: thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:01:07 +0000

26 lines

Re: thorn plectrum: thorn scratched

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 07:23:24 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25?

Re: Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25?

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 15:21:39 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

tilney book

tilney book

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:23:24 +0100

12 lines

Re: tilney book

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 14:30:21 +0100

37 lines

Re: tilney book

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:21:40 +0100

20 lines

tilney book

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 12:28:54 +0100

39 lines

Re: tilney book

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 09:59:13 -0400

19 lines

Re: tilney book

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 16:00:11 +0100

18 lines

Re: tilney book

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Mar 2009 13:52:31 -0700

24 lines

tilney book

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Mar 2009 08:54:36 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Tolerating a Clavichord

Tolerating a Clavichord

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 14:12:02 -0700

102 lines

New Thread

tuning pins again

tuning pins again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 20:15:59 +0800

24 lines

Re: tuning pins again

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:46:52 +0100

20 lines

Re: tuning pins again

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:33:45 -0000

20 lines

Re: tuning pins again

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:36:53 +0100

50 lines

Re: tuning pins again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:18:28 +0800

26 lines

Re: tuning pins again

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:05:19 +0100

20 lines

Re: tuning pins again

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:11:42 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

tuning pins...

tuning pins...

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:08:29 +0100

41 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Dongsok Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:35:52 EST

31 lines

Re: tuning pins...

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 21:51:25 +0100

18 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Dongsok Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:54:03 EST

33 lines

Re: tuning pins...

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:11:43 +0100

20 lines

Re: tuning pins...

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:29:13 -0500

50 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 06:42:28 +0100

46 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:28:00 +0000

35 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:42:13 +0800

42 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 21:37:40 -0000

71 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:28:20 +0000

45 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:18:54 -0800

49 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:28:01 -0500

53 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 14:30:16 +0100

25 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 16:27:20 -0500

26 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 06:27:35 +0100

30 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Martin Puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:08:54 +0100

24 lines

Re: tuning pins...

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:35:32 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Tunning Hammer

Tunning Hammer

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:33:45 -0800

19 lines

Re: Tunning Hammer

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:43:28 +0100

25 lines

Re: Tunning Hammer

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 22:01:48 -0000

46 lines

Re: Tunning Hammer

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:39:15 -0500

28 lines

Re: Tunning Hammer

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:40:54 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Tunning(sic) Hammer

Re: Tunning(sic) Hammer

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 23:10:04 +0100

12 lines

Re: Tunning(sic) Hammer

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 17:33:12 -0500

21 lines

Re: Tunning(sic) Hammer

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 00:14:58 +0100

28 lines

Re: Tunning(sic) Hammer

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 00:25:46 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Twist-turning technique book

Twist-turning technique book

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 16:23:44 -0500

23 lines

Re: Twist-turning technique book

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:14:23 +0100

17 lines

Re: Twist-turning technique book

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:05:28 +0100

21 lines

Re: Twist-turning technique book

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 22:20:04 -0500

41 lines

Re: Twist-turning technique book

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Mar 2009 23:44:43 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENT - 2nd Revised Edition!!

UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENT - 2nd Revised Edition!!

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:03:08 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Various topics from the latest

Various topics from the latest

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 13:59:55 -0800

93 lines

Re: Various topics from the latest

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:47:28 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

wedding

wedding

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 03:57:49 -0800

26 lines

Re: wedding

Lesley de Voil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:46:45 +1000

33 lines

Re: wedding

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:48:02 -0500

47 lines

Re: wedding

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:50:19 -0500

46 lines

Re: wedding

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 05:31:28 -0800

56 lines

Re: wedding

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 15:15:37 +0100

39 lines

Re: wedding

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 07:45:28 -0800

48 lines

Re: wedding

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 10:00:52 -0600

17 lines

Re: wedding

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 11:16:16 -0500

24 lines

Re: wedding

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 08:22:29 -0800

29 lines

Re: wedding

Nicholas Good <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 09:32:04 -0800

47 lines

Re: wedding

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 22:30:45 +0100

18 lines

wedding

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 12:38:22 -0700

39 lines

Re: wedding

Helen Cripe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 16:07:53 -0400

78 lines

Re: wedding

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Mar 2009 17:54:23 -0400

21 lines

Re: wedding

Tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Mar 2009 20:34:18 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Wedding Music -- Suggestion

Wedding Music -- Suggestion

George Haeh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 08:37:28 -0500

13 lines

Re: Wedding Music -- Suggestion

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 12:53:12 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

what to play in a wedding if...

what to play in a wedding if...

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 12:24:18 -0700

28 lines

Re: what to play in a wedding if...

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:20:24 -0400

20 lines

Re: what to play in a wedding if...

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Mar 2009 16:31:31 -0500

31 lines

Re: what to play in a wedding if...

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Mar 2009 15:51:33 -0400

38 lines

Re: what to play in a wedding if...

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Mar 2009 20:51:59 -0700

54 lines

New Thread

why extend compass?

why extend compass?

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 04:16:49 -0500

13 lines

Re: why extend compass?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 10:01:51 +0000

29 lines

New Thread

why not copy english harpsichords

why not copy english harpsichords

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 02:00:40 -0500

10 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 02:08:34 -0500

16 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 09:31:14 +0100

16 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:28:03 +1100

20 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:08:44 +0100

19 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 06:58:21 -0500

49 lines

why not copy english harpsichords

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:11:21 -0500

12 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:08:59 +0800

29 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:10:46 +0800

22 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 15:12:39 +0100

17 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 07:17:05 -0800

27 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:31:17 -0500

22 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 11:44:20 -0600

13 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 13:57:44 -0500

47 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 20:38:22 +0100

21 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:40:46 -0500

24 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:48:33 -0700

20 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 02:47:42 +0100

27 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Douglas?= <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 03:23:42 -0500

36 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 14:36:02 +0000

38 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 10:09:27 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

why not copy english harpsichords??

Re: why not copy english harpsichords??

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 10:57:29 -0000

39 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords??

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 11:44:05 -0400

25 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords??

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 19:25:31 +0100

19 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords??

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 23:38:16 -0400

26 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords??

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 20:24:35 +1100

36 lines

Re: why not copy english harpsichords??

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Mar 2009 21:49:41 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Why why why?

Why why why?

Your Full Name <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 14:47:58 EST

69 lines

Re: Why why why?

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Mar 2009 12:59:15 -0800

92 lines

New Thread

William Dowd #48 for sale

William Dowd #48 for sale

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Mar 2009 20:18:56 +1100

38 lines

Re: William Dowd #48 for sale

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Mar 2009 07:09:44 -0400

36 lines

New Thread

Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 09:54:35 -0000

60 lines

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 11:50:08 -0000

71 lines

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:21:05 -0000

26 lines

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 08:27:51 -0500

32 lines

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Eva Schulze <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 15:27:28 +0100

23 lines

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 13:01:07 -0500

71 lines

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Mar 2009 12:37:02 -0600

102 lines

Re: Youtube Handel, was Harpsichord Transport Device

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 02:12:02 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

ZELL PLANS

ZELL PLANS

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 01:09:13 -0500

12 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 07:45:10 +0100

23 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 03:45:13 -0500

24 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 14:46:36 +0100

37 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Mar 2009 10:34:11 -0500

35 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:01:14 +0100

22 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:04:04 +0100

20 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:06:18 +0100

38 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Mar 2009 00:43:22 +0100

27 lines

Re: ZELL PLANS

"Josep F. Pampidó" <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Mar 2009 23:50:48 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

zen was Kits

zen was Kits

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Mar 2009 00:44:01 +0100

22 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu