LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Will your daughter play strings, brass or our harpsichord? Yes, our harpsichord (1 message)
2x8s V 1x8,1x4. (29 messages)
A=415 = C=? (3 messages)
Another Dissertation --Charles Mould (4 messages)
another italian double (1 message)
awkward trill - anyone have a better idea? (19 messages)
awkward trill - Old fingers (2 messages)
Bach compass (2 messages)
Bach compass-One E (5 messages)
Bach concerto compass question (12 messages)
bach solo concerti (12 messages)
Barthold Kuijken in Minneapolis (1 message)
before wax (2 messages)
berlin (1 message)
Bizzi (1 message)
Bizzi - was John Shortridge (4 messages)
Brussels "Ruckers" Taskin (2 messages)
busy hum of men (1 message)
BWV 542, was Re: Bach concerto compass question (1 message)
Certifications, on topic with regard to building and repairing musical instruments (4 messages)
Clavichord construction ....sidetrack (3 messages)
Clavichord construction video (6 messages)
Clayson & Garrett (1 message)
clink clink (1 message)
Compass.......was-Re: Does the Berliner speak french? (2 messages)
concerts this weekend LYRA BAROQUE (1 message)
Contrasting Harpsichords/Instruments (5 messages)
correction (1 message)
Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston (1 message)
Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston- Stringing list (1 message)
David Bolton gone too soon :( (1 message)
David Fuller's Dissertation (1 message)
deal again (7 messages)
dendroetymology again (1 message)
dendroetymology cont'd (7 messages)
dendroetymology Douglas Fir (1 message)
do it yourself, the Popular Mechanical way (1 message)
Does the Berliner speak french? (5 messages)
Douglas Fir (2 messages)
Douglas fir - introduction to the UK (1 message)
ebonising large pieces (3 messages)
ebonising larger pieces (8 messages)
English Harpsichord magazine (8 messages)
fanning ribbing (2 messages)
faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished? (12 messages)
frame design re gap spacers (4 messages)
Frank Lee Ruckers (2 messages)
Frederick the Great's harpsichords (2 messages)
French doubles (1 message)
French in Berlin (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Does the Berliner speak french? (1 message)
Fwd: Re: gap spacers (2 messages)
Fwd: [fortepiano] Digest Number 1825 (1 message)
gap spacers (15 messages)
gap spacers again (13 messages)
german instruments (18 messages)
Gesso (13 messages)
GL Froberger (3 messages)
Glenn White and Seattle Italians (too long - sorry) (1 message)
grain direction in delrin (17 messages)
Hanseatic Lutherans (1 message)
Hantai's Goldbergs (8 messages)
Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos (9 messages)
harpsichord germany (1 message)
harpsichord list in the raw, was Hantai's Goldbergs (2 messages)
height of keys over floor (8 messages)
hyman stringing (2 messages)
INSULTS AGAIN? (1 message)
INSULTS AGAIN? ANONYMOUS AGAIN? (1 message)
Introduction and question (45 messages)
Introduction and question again (2 messages)
Introduction and question-One or two manuals (1 message)
IPhone stuff... I know I know (9 messages)
Iron in the treble (1 message)
Italian Harpsichord-Building in the 16th and 17th Centuries by Shortridge (1 message)
Italian Harpsichords - was John Shortridge (1 message)
Italians in Omaha (3 messages)
J.S.B. and compass (1 message)
John Shortridge (28 messages)
Landowska Tribute (1 message)
lesson this Fri (1 message)
local humidification (6 messages)
Long enough but not too long (1 message)
Lullabies (6 messages)
mac and early playing technique (3 messages)
Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death? (1 message)
making harpsichords (11 messages)
managing distortion (2 messages)
Modern Monteverdi? (7 messages)
more on 1x8 1x4 (1 message)
Moshack (18 messages)
Moshack vs Migliai (gianpiero) (1 message)
Moshack, was German instruments (1 message)
mostly brass (4 messages)
Multiple harpsichords (3 messages)
My all german harpsichord trip (3 messages)
nameboard calligraphy (1 message)
Nice CD by Marcin Swiatkiewicz (4 messages)
Ode to an over-heated music room (1 message)
ooops (1 message)
P. Sylvestris (3 messages)
Pamphlet 225 and John Shortridge (1 message)
Performance Practice Review 13 (2008) (1 message)
peruvian harpsichord soundboard wood (1 message)
Pioneer Italian Harpsichords (1 message)
Pioneer Italian Harpsichords (west coast) (4 messages)
problem with F (1 message)
ribbing under bridge (1 message)
Shortridge again (1 message)
So. California concert (1 message)
Sodi / Re: Introduction and question (6 messages)
soundboards for easy to make harpsichords (1 message)
stereo beating cont. (8 messages)
Stress and Gap spacers (2 messages)
Swell harpsichord (2 messages)
Sweller harpsichords (2 messages)
tempis fugit & sic transit ... (1 message)
the english rococo (11 messages)
The glory of PAINT (3 messages)
The Other Vater (1 message)
Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25? (3 messages)
To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ? (7 messages)
Triple Concerto ? ? (1 message)
Two little unrelated points (1 message)
Two more West Coast Makers of Italian Harpsichords (1 message)
was gap spacers (5 messages)
who's making/restoring what (3 messages)
Willard Martin (1 message)
Zuckerman jacks and wire (5 messages)
[Fwd: Troubling news for La Petite Bande - let's do something to help] (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Will your daughter play strings, brass or our harpsichord? Yes, our harpsichord

"Will your daughter play strings, brass or our harpsichord? Yes, our harpsichord

George Haeh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:37:52 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:08:07 -0500

13 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:26:47 -0000

35 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:44:52 -0500

10 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 05:54:51 -0800

25 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 14:19:25 +0000

32 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:31:15 -0800

43 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:46:51 +0100

38 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:02:42 -0500

35 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:04:57 +0000

28 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:05:06 +0100

48 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 07:06:10 -0800

23 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:09:21 +0100

23 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 10:11:07 -0500

28 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 15:17:15 +0000

33 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:23:26 -0800

23 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 11:52:21 -0500

22 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:59:20 -0000

37 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:39:47 +0100

33 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:41:59 +0100

20 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:42:31 +0100

18 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:43:21 +0100

17 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:03:31 +0000

36 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:04:18 +0100

45 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:07:26 +0100

14 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:14:23 +0100

21 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:23:17 -0000

28 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 12:26:11 -0800

43 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

turpin ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 21:50:24 +0100

17 lines

Re: 2x8s V 1x8,1x4.

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:54:24 +0800

38 lines

New Thread

A=415 = C=?

A=415 = C=?

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 22:30:26 -0500

12 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:40:56 +0100

11 lines

Re: A=415 = C=?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 08:16:21 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

Another Dissertation --Charles Mould

Re: Another Dissertation --Charles Mould

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:19:41 -0500

24 lines

Re: Another Dissertation --Charles Mould

Eleanor Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:20:11 +0000

53 lines

Re: Another Dissertation --Charles Mould

William C. Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:47:13 -0500

43 lines

Re: Another Dissertation --Charles Mould

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 02:12:34 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

another italian double

another italian double

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:17:06 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Douglas?= <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:24:59 -0500

33 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:48:56 -0500

29 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:00:41 -0600

13 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:21:14 -0500

42 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 17:44:25 -0500

30 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:02:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:29:21 +0100

36 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

pavao masic <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 01:29:17 -0800

56 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:27:03 -0500

48 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 22:31:20 -0500

18 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 04:03:02 -0500

24 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:23:36 -0000

25 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:18:42 +0100

29 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:25:14 +0100

21 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 13:54:58 +0100

40 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:53:43 -0000

41 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:10:41 +0100

37 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 14:53:10 -0500

22 lines

Re: awkward trill - anyone have a better idea?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 09:55:46 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

awkward trill - Old fingers

Re: awkward trill - Old fingers

Your Full Name <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:43:20 EST

43 lines

Re: awkward trill - Old fingers

William Wingstedt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 18:08:55 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Bach compass

Re: Bach compass

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:03:46 +0100

18 lines

Re: Bach compass

Dongsok Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 09:06:43 EST

30 lines

New Thread

Bach compass-One E

Re: Bach compass-One E

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:17:26 -0000

16 lines

Re: Bach compass-One E

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:23:14 +0100

16 lines

Re: Bach compass-One E

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:49:17 +0100

19 lines

Re: Bach compass-One E

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:59:04 -0000

38 lines

Re: Bach compass-One E

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:25:52 -0000

43 lines

New Thread

Bach concerto compass question

Bach concerto compass question

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 07:59:02 -0500

23 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

Dongsok Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:08:07 EST

42 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:52:36 -0000

45 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:08:46 +0100

24 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:15:10 +0100

21 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:23:12 -0000

25 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:36:07 +0100

17 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:34:42 -0000

26 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 14:38:09 -0000

17 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:54:00 +0100

18 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 15:55:20 +0100

41 lines

Re: Bach concerto compass question

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:08:29 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

bach solo concerti

bach solo concerti

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 19:17:54 +0100

23 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:45:35 -0500

25 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:54:48 -0800

25 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 07:14:12 -0600

27 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 10:20:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 15:43:06 -0000

44 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 19:39:25 -0500

42 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Robert Munsell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:07:21 -0500

36 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 19:08:25 +0100

21 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 13:59:14 -0500

35 lines

Re: bach solo concerti

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:34:04 -0500

19 lines

bach solo concerti

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 14:43:49 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Barthold Kuijken in Minneapolis

Barthold Kuijken in Minneapolis

Immanuel Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:00:03 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

before wax

before wax

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 00:33:26 +0100

17 lines

Re: before wax

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:47:47 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

berlin

berlin

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 21:25:03 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Bizzi

Re: Bizzi

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:42:02 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Bizzi - was John Shortridge

Bizzi - was John Shortridge

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 21:17:05 +1100

27 lines

Re: Bizzi - was John Shortridge

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:56:25 +0000

28 lines

Re: Bizzi - was John Shortridge

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:46:23 +0100

17 lines

Re: Bizzi - was John Shortridge

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 23:30:42 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Brussels "Ruckers" Taskin

Brussels "Ruckers" Taskin

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:35:09 -0500

13 lines

Re: Brussels "Ruckers" Taskin

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:47:19 -0800

11 lines

New Thread

busy hum of men

busy hum of men

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 12:19:21 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

BWV 542, was Re: Bach concerto compass question

BWV 542, was Re: Bach concerto compass question

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:22:49 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Certifications, on topic with regard to building and repairing musical instruments

Certifications, on topic with regard to building and repairing musical instruments

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:57:58 -0700

37 lines

Re: Certifications, on topic with regard to building and repairing musical instruments

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:42:44 -0800

40 lines

Re: Certifications, on topic with regard to building and repairing musical instruments

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:50:13 +0100

69 lines

Re: Certifications, on topic with regard to building and repairing musical instruments

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 19:27:13 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Clavichord construction ....sidetrack

Re: Clavichord construction ....sidetrack

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:39:58 -0500

21 lines

Re: Clavichord construction ....sidetrack

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 16:10:00 +1100

30 lines

Re: Clavichord construction ....sidetrack

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:45:45 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Clavichord construction video

Clavichord construction video

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:52:43 -0500

18 lines

Re: Clavichord construction video

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 18:08:35 +0100

22 lines

Re: Clavichord construction video

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 12:20:32 -0500

32 lines

Re: Clavichord construction video

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:45:41 -0800

18 lines

Re: Clavichord construction video

Willem Vangerberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:01:02 -0500

20 lines

Re: Clavichord construction video

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 14:54:29 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Clayson & Garrett

Clayson & Garrett

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:50:06 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

clink clink

clink clink

turpin ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Mar 2009 00:10:49 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Compass.......was-Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

Re: Compass.......was-Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:36:06 -0500

58 lines

Re: Compass.......was-Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:18:38 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

concerts this weekend LYRA BAROQUE

concerts this weekend LYRA BAROQUE

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:30:38 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

Contrasting Harpsichords/Instruments

Contrasting Harpsichords/Instruments

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:03:14 -0500

17 lines

Re: Contrasting Harpsichords/Instruments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:11:04 -0500

21 lines

Re: Contrasting Harpsichords/Instruments

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:38:02 -0500

24 lines

Re: Contrasting Harpsichords/Instruments

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 13:01:32 -0500

33 lines

Re: Contrasting Harpsichords/Instruments

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 01:50:41 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

correction

correction

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 20:41:23 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston

Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:43:17 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston- Stringing list

Re: Couchet/Blanchet/Taskin at Boston- Stringing list

Martin Spaink <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 19:01:21 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

David Bolton gone too soon :(

David Bolton gone too soon :(

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 18:46:31 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

David Fuller's Dissertation

David Fuller's Dissertation

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 17:57:28 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

deal again

deal again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:12:19 -0800

42 lines

Re: deal again

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:15:34 +0100

23 lines

Re: deal again

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:13:16 -0800

32 lines

Re: deal again

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:40:20 +0100

40 lines

Re: deal again

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 12:43:09 +0100

19 lines

Re: deal again

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:48:57 -0500

37 lines

Re: deal again

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 10:10:17 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

dendroetymology again

Re: dendroetymology again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:53:32 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

dendroetymology cont'd

dendroetymology cont'd

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:58:45 +0100

22 lines

Re: dendroetymology cont'd

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 12:05:35 -0800

29 lines

Re: dendroetymology cont'd

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 07:10:23 +0100

20 lines

Re: dendroetymology cont'd

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 22:29:23 -0800

30 lines

Re: dendroetymology cont'd

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:08:26 -0500

29 lines

Re: dendroetymology cont'd

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:40:00 +0100

28 lines

Re: dendroetymology cont'd

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 05:03:58 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

dendroetymology Douglas Fir

Re: dendroetymology Douglas Fir

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:17:46 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

do it yourself, the Popular Mechanical way

do it yourself, the Popular Mechanical way

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 06:24:06 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

Does the Berliner speak french?

Does the Berliner speak french?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:33:00 -0800

34 lines

Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:41:08 +0100

44 lines

Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 10:00:21 +0000

33 lines

Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 12:33:15 +0100

20 lines

Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 00:41:55 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Douglas Fir

Douglas Fir

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 08:48:49 -0800

28 lines

Re: Douglas Fir

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 07:30:08 +1100

48 lines

New Thread

Douglas fir - introduction to the UK

Re: Douglas fir - introduction to the UK

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 12:15:48 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

ebonising large pieces

ebonising large pieces

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 16:51:31 +0100

12 lines

Re: ebonising large pieces

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 19:24:38 +0100

20 lines

Re: ebonising large pieces

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 08:28:20 EST

44 lines

New Thread

ebonising larger pieces

ebonising larger pieces

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:49:22 +0100

14 lines

Re: ebonising larger pieces

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:17:36 -0500

14 lines

Re: ebonising larger pieces

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:28:40 +0100

19 lines

Re: ebonising larger pieces

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 21:35:01 +0000

31 lines

Re: ebonising larger pieces

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:46:11 -0500

14 lines

Re: ebonising larger pieces

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:49:04 +0100

20 lines

Re: ebonising larger pieces

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:31:14 +0100

32 lines

Re: ebonising larger pieces

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 23:31:33 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

English Harpsichord magazine

English Harpsichord magazine

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:21:21 -0500

13 lines

Re: English Harpsichord magazine

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:50:33 -0000

25 lines

Re: English Harpsichord magazine

Kathy Woodworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 10:59:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: English Harpsichord magazine

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:42:19 +0100

26 lines

Re: English Harpsichord magazine

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 16:57:56 +0000

15 lines

Re: English Harpsichord magazine

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 12:31:29 -0500

21 lines

Re: English Harpsichord magazine

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 17:51:12 -0000

25 lines

Re: English Harpsichord magazine

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2009 15:42:50 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

fanning ribbing

fanning ribbing

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:50:10 +0100

29 lines

Re: fanning ribbing

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:57:44 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Paul Gunzelmann <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:12:28 -0500

15 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:53:26 -0500

22 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Dongsok Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 14:55:38 EST

34 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:14:54 -0500

17 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:26:57 -0500

32 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Mark Janello <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:31:59 -0500

25 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:52:41 -0500

48 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 09:57:08 -0500

40 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 16:00:34 +0100

91 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 17:53:09 -0500

20 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:21:53 -0500

66 lines

Re: faux-Trasontini clavichord vanished?

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:53:50 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

frame design re gap spacers

frame design re gap spacers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 10:44:15 +0000

28 lines

Re: frame design re gap spacers

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 11:11:14 -0000

46 lines

Re: frame design re gap spacers

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:03:23 +0100

18 lines

Re: frame design re gap spacers

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:13:39 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

Frank Lee Ruckers

Frank Lee Ruckers

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 09:46:00 -0500

14 lines

Re: Frank Lee Ruckers

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:00:22 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Frederick the Great's harpsichords

Re: Frederick the Great's harpsichords

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:53:49 -0500

28 lines

Re: Frederick the Great's harpsichords

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Douglas?= <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 00:14:11 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

French doubles

French doubles

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:26:23 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

French in Berlin

French in Berlin

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:35:35 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

Fwd: Re: Does the Berliner speak french?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 23:26:19 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: gap spacers

Fwd: Re: gap spacers

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:33:59 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: gap spacers

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:45:54 +0800

24 lines

New Thread

Fwd: [fortepiano] Digest Number 1825

Fwd: [fortepiano] Digest Number 1825

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:08:45 +0100

70 lines

New Thread

gap spacers

gap spacers

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 16:55:27 -0800

15 lines

Re: gap spacers

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 11:47:00 +0100

33 lines

Re: gap spacers

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:09:40 +1100

20 lines

Re: gap spacers

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 20:34:31 -0000

32 lines

Re: gap spacers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:17:21 +0000

30 lines

Re: gap spacers

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 21:32:42 -0000

36 lines

Re: gap spacers

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:03:54 +0100

34 lines

Re: gap spacers

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 00:09:00 +0100

20 lines

Re: gap spacers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 07:17:55 +0000

32 lines

Re: gap spacers

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:28:31 +0100

25 lines

Re: gap spacers

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 11:04:59 -0800

33 lines

Re: gap spacers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 18:33:39 +0000

36 lines

Re: gap spacers

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 15:15:24 -0500

19 lines

Re: gap spacers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:48:51 +0000

21 lines

Re: gap spacers

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 14:00:27 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

gap spacers again

Re: gap spacers again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:34:03 -0800

20 lines

Re: gap spacers again

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 23:38:16 +0100

20 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:48:20 +0100

17 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 08:58:18 +0000

35 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:48:41 +0800

31 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:21:16 +0000

26 lines

Re: gap spacers again

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 07:17:11 -0800

39 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:27:32 -0500

20 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:56:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: gap spacers again

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:41:30 -0800

50 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:03:42 -0500

28 lines

Re: gap spacers again

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:15:58 -0500

32 lines

Re: gap spacers again

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:13:33 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

german instruments

Re: german instruments

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:19:41 +0100

79 lines

Re: german instruments

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 21:29:10 +0100

25 lines

Re: german instruments

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 22:07:02 +0100

37 lines

Re: german instruments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 18:16:44 -0500

23 lines

Re: german instruments

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 01:02:27 +0100

22 lines

Re: german instruments

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:56:18 +0100

100 lines

Re: german instruments

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:18:51 +0000

27 lines

Re: German instruments

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 06:42:59 -0500

35 lines

Re: German instruments

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:36:14 +0100

92 lines

Re: German instruments

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:22:58 +0100

17 lines

Re: German instruments

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:38:37 -0500

117 lines

Re: German instruments

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:40:13 +0100

19 lines

Re: German instruments

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:07:23 -0500

31 lines

Re: German instruments

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 11:28:01 -0500

32 lines

Re: German instruments

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:23:59 +0100

19 lines

Re: German instruments

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 13:04:27 -0500

46 lines

Re: german instruments

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:06:18 -0500

30 lines

Re: German instruments

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 16:14:01 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Gesso

Gesso

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 15:23:53 +0100

45 lines

Re: Gesso

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 16:37:34 +0100

31 lines

Re: Gesso

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 09:44:51 -0700

19 lines

Re: Gesso

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:28:03 +0100

50 lines

Re: Gesso

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 21:00:18 +0100

31 lines

Re: Gesso

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 21:18:41 +1100

69 lines

Re: Gesso

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:59:54 -0000

20 lines

Re: Gesso

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:08:39 +0000

33 lines

Re: Gesso

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:50:37 +0100

15 lines

Re: Gesso

Christopher Nobbs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 15:09:07 -0000

65 lines

Re: Gesso

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:07:40 -0700

25 lines

Re: Gesso

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 09:09:13 -0700

18 lines

gesso

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 20:19:11 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

GL Froberger

GL Froberger

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:15:24 -0600

20 lines

Re: GL Froberger

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 18:14:32 -0500

19 lines

Re: GL Froberger

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:12:51 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

Glenn White and Seattle Italians (too long - sorry)

Glenn White and Seattle Italians (too long - sorry)

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:07:34 -0800

151 lines

New Thread

grain direction in delrin

grain direction in delrin

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:51:15 +0100

20 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 04:08:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:13:06 +0800

28 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Martin Puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:36:27 +0100

34 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:04:23 +0000

40 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:18:20 +0100

25 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 08:49:25 -0500

42 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:11:13 +0000

41 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:02:42 -0500

43 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:53:29 -0500

27 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 16:51:53 -0000

21 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:10:08 +0100

19 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:55:38 +0000

30 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 20:05:55 +0100

20 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 15:12:21 -0500

22 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 01:57:41 +0100

20 lines

Re: grain direction in delrin

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:34:53 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Hanseatic Lutherans

Hanseatic Lutherans

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 09:31:47 -0700

82 lines

New Thread

Hantai's Goldbergs

Hantai's Goldbergs

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:05:07 -0500

14 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:25:28 -0500

29 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs

Kathy Woodworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:48:56 -0500

27 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs

Kathy Woodworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 11:51:19 -0500

27 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:15:15 -0500

20 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:22:02 EST

35 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 13:31:11 -0500

18 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 14:15:12 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

Willem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 16:32:40 -0500

15 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:49:42 +0100

13 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:22:07 -0000

29 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:55:24 +0100

26 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 11:32:24 -0000

28 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:54:18 +0100

18 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 14:46:29 +0100

67 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:19:04 -0500

29 lines

Re: Hantai's Goldbergs Google videos

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:31:21 -0000

43 lines

New Thread

harpsichord germany

harpsichord germany

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 13:42:54 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

harpsichord list in the raw, was Hantai's Goldbergs

harpsichord list in the raw, was Hantai's Goldbergs

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 20:04:31 +0100

33 lines

harpsichord list in the raw, was Hantai's Goldbergs

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:50:27 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

height of keys over floor

height of keys over floor

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 22:20:53 +0100

16 lines

Re: height of keys over floor

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 21:56:44 +1100

21 lines

Re: height of keys over floor

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 06:07:52 -0800

31 lines

Re: height of keys over floor

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:34:47 +0100

54 lines

Re: height of keys over floor

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 00:50:26 +0100

71 lines

Re: height of keys over floor

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 15:39:37 +1100

17 lines

Re: height of keys over floor

Lesley de Voil <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 14:56:55 +1000

19 lines

Re: height of keys over floor

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 21:32:44 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

hyman stringing

hyman stringing

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 20:45:39 -0800

15 lines

Re: hyman stringing

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:50:34 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

INSULTS AGAIN?

INSULTS AGAIN?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:21:14 -0000

40 lines

New Thread

INSULTS AGAIN? ANONYMOUS AGAIN?

Re: INSULTS AGAIN? ANONYMOUS AGAIN?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:34:11 -0000

60 lines

New Thread

Introduction and question

Introduction and question

pablo sabat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 06:13:41 -0800

26 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:23:02 -0000

79 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:42:02 -0500

67 lines

Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:42:22 +0100

53 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 09:51:48 -0600

21 lines

Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 17:18:15 +0100

16 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:20:22 -0800

30 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 14:57:02 -0800

69 lines

Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:25:33 +0100

23 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 15:45:36 -0500

72 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:20:49 -0500

40 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:28:29 +0100

37 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 06:52:10 +0100

28 lines

Re: Introduction and question

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:39:44 +0100

20 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 05:57:19 -0500

178 lines

Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:55:23 +0100

31 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:52:18 -0000

53 lines

Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:02:10 +0100

21 lines

Re: Introduction and question

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:17:17 +0100

17 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:25:19 -0000

40 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:16:18 -0500

17 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:49:12 -0500

28 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:11:29 -0500

20 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:19:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Introduction and question

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:41:06 -0500

31 lines

Re: Introduction and question

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:06:33 -0700

18 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:59:43 -0000

29 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:49:13 -0500

25 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:23:08 -0500

16 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:46:21 +0100

52 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:05:39 +0100

21 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Peter Thresh-BH <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 18:28:39 -0000

49 lines

Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 00:24:06 +0100

31 lines

Re: Introduction and question

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:53:32 -0600

25 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 21:09:51 -0500

48 lines

Re: Introduction and question

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:02:16 -0800

17 lines

Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:39:46 +0100

61 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Peter Thresh-BH <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:06:02 -0000

90 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 15:51:11 +0100

144 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 11:52:22 -0500

45 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 12:06:26 -0500

51 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 18:19:46 +0100

27 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:29:19 -0500

22 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 14:36:09 -0500

144 lines

Re: Introduction and question

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:36:46 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Introduction and question again

Re: Introduction and question again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:10:20 -0800

35 lines

Re: Introduction and question again

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 22:07:52 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Introduction and question-One or two manuals

Re: Introduction and question-One or two manuals

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:34:16 -0000

67 lines

New Thread

IPhone stuff... I know I know

IPhone stuff... I know I know

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 00:26:52 -0500

24 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:04:02 -0500

24 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:22:24 -0500

39 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 01:28:41 -0500

13 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 23:33:05 -0800

21 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 08:37:20 +0100

44 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 10:21:27 -0500

28 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 21:15:31 -0500

108 lines

Re: IPhone stuff... I know I know

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:47:32 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Iron in the treble

Iron in the treble

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2009 06:05:00 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Italian Harpsichord-Building in the 16th and 17th Centuries by Shortridge

Italian Harpsichord-Building in the 16th and 17th Centuries by Shortridge

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:17:29 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Italian Harpsichords - was John Shortridge

Italian Harpsichords - was John Shortridge

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:00:10 -0800

61 lines

New Thread

Italians in Omaha

Italians in Omaha

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:02:42 -0500

12 lines

Re: Italians in Omaha

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:07:37 -0500

36 lines

Re: Italians in Omaha

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 14:04:44 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

J.S.B. and compass

J.S.B. and compass

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:46:06 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

John Shortridge

John Shortridge

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 22:46:09 -0500

19 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 23:28:50 -0500

38 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 23:44:48 -0500

25 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 07:42:34 +0800

42 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 10:08:03 -0500

16 lines

Re: John Shortridge

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:25:31 -0500

53 lines

Re: John Shortridge

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 22:20:57 +0100

26 lines

Re: John Shortridge

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 19:30:58 -0800

48 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:46:20 -0500

34 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 23:58:13 -0500

33 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 00:05:37 -0500

33 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:07:37 -0500

25 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:28:42 -0500

22 lines

Re: John Shortridge

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:30:06 -0700

18 lines

Re: John Shortridge

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 08:31:59 -0700

40 lines

Re: John Shortridge

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 19:51:53 -0600

42 lines

Re: John Shortridge

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:47:33 -0700

64 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Willem Vangerberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 11:01:34 -0500

20 lines

Re: John Shortridge

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 12:40:39 -0700

26 lines

Re: John Shortridge

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 15:11:18 -0800

27 lines

Re: John Shortridge

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:09:49 -0500

41 lines

Re: John Shortridge

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:46:03 -0800

68 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:02:37 -0500

57 lines

Re: John Shortridge

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:17:40 -0700

18 lines

Re: John Shortridge

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:20:01 -0500

45 lines

Re: John Shortridge

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 13:26:24 -0500

27 lines

Re: John Shortridge

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 19:45:56 -0800

61 lines

Re: John Shortridge

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 06:45:22 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Landowska Tribute

Landowska Tribute

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 17:23:19 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

lesson this Fri

lesson this Fri

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:23:22 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

local humidification

local humidification

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:46:29 -0500

24 lines

Re: local humidification

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:19:33 -0600

13 lines

Re: local humidification

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:08:43 -0500

30 lines

Re: local humidification

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 20:39:08 +0100

51 lines

Re: local humidification

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:52:51 -0500

30 lines

Re: local humidification

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:26:17 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Long enough but not too long

Long enough but not too long

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 18:50:23 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Lullabies

Lullabies

meg irwin-brandon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:35:48 -0300

18 lines

Re: Lullabies

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 18:57:27 -0500

40 lines

Re: Lullabies

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:25:03 -0500

33 lines

Re: Lullabies

Ray Ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:28:04 -0500

31 lines

Re: Lullabies

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 07:48:12 +0100

30 lines

Re: Lullabies

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:32:53 -0000

33 lines

New Thread

mac and early playing technique

mac and early playing technique

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 14:02:49 -0500

15 lines

Re: mac and early playing technique

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 12:22:57 -0800

27 lines

Re: mac and early playing technique

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 06:20:54 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 02:12:44 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

making harpsichords

making harpsichords

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 13:36:13 +0100

33 lines

Re: making harpsichords

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:35:25 -0500

25 lines

Re: making harpsichords

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:03:57 -0700

49 lines

Re: making harpsichords

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:17:53 +0100

30 lines

Re: making harpsichords

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 14:01:21 -0700

44 lines

Re: making harpsichords

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:29:34 +0100

93 lines

Re: making harpsichords

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 07:58:48 -0700

34 lines

Re: making harpsichords

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 10:58:10 -0500

47 lines

Re: making harpsichords

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 09:48:16 -0700

28 lines

Re: making harpsichords

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2009 13:30:18 -0500

35 lines

Re: making harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 23:23:03 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

managing distortion

managing distortion

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 13:10:42 +0100

45 lines

Re: managing distortion

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 18:38:04 +0100

72 lines

New Thread

Modern Monteverdi?

Modern Monteverdi?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:46:29 +0100

36 lines

Re: Modern Monteverdi?

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 09:08:11 -0500

29 lines

Re: Modern Monteverdi?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 15:49:05 +0100

23 lines

Re: Modern Monteverdi?

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:31:57 -0500

41 lines

Re: Modern Monteverdi?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 16:21:30 +0100

23 lines

Re: Modern Monteverdi?

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 10:40:47 -0500

27 lines

Re: Modern Monteverdi?

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 22:26:55 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

more on 1x8 1x4

more on 1x8 1x4

David Martin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 20:51:55 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Moshack

Moshack

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 11:33:42 +0100

71 lines

Re: Moshack

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:18:19 +0100

19 lines

Re: Moshack

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 14:26:50 -0800

21 lines

Re: Moshack

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 19:46:49 +0000

26 lines

Re: Moshack

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 21:01:29 +0100

21 lines

Re: Moshack

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 23:13:24 +0100

87 lines

Re: Moshack

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 22:12:40 -0000

36 lines

Re: Moshack

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 00:15:02 +0100

25 lines

Re: Moshack

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:28:52 +0100

68 lines

Moshack

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 07:44:06 +0100

16 lines

Re: Moshack

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 09:45:05 +0100

58 lines

Re: Moshack

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:17:24 +0100

20 lines

Re: Moshack

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:31:22 +0100

62 lines

Re: Moshack

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:32:57 +0100

17 lines

Re: Moshack

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:52:37 +0100

26 lines

Re: Moshack

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 14:11:55 +0100

55 lines

Re: Moshack

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 15:55:32 +0100

22 lines

Re: Moshack

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 17:02:11 +0100

111 lines

New Thread

Moshack vs Migliai (gianpiero)

Moshack vs Migliai (gianpiero)

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2009 10:49:09 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Moshack, was German instruments

Re: Moshack, was German instruments

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:28:06 -0000

44 lines

New Thread

mostly brass

Re: mostly brass

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 11:14:17 -0500

22 lines

Re: mostly brass

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 17:38:28 +0100

22 lines

Re: mostly brass

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 20:49:30 +0100

66 lines

Re: mostly brass

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 21:02:21 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Multiple harpsichords

Multiple harpsichords

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 17:15:33 -0800

32 lines

Re: Multiple harpsichords

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2009 23:56:12 -0000

37 lines

Re: Multiple harpsichords

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2009 07:01:36 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

My all german harpsichord trip

My all german harpsichord trip

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 11:30:15 -0800

32 lines

Re: My all german harpsichord trip

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 20:45:01 +0100

20 lines

Re: My all german harpsichord trip

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 14:54:42 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

nameboard calligraphy

nameboard calligraphy

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:39:20 -0800

16 lines

New Thread

Nice CD by Marcin Swiatkiewicz

Nice CD by Marcin Swiatkiewicz

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 23:20:36 -0500

17 lines

Re: Nice CD by Marcin Swiatkiewicz

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 17:40:59 -0500

17 lines

Re: Nice CD by Marcin Swiatkiewicz

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2009 20:43:30 -0500

25 lines

Re: Nice CD by Marcin Swiatkiewicz

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 09:47:22 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Ode to an over-heated music room

Ode to an over-heated music room

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 08:31:08 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

ooops

ooops

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 16:31:13 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

P. Sylvestris

P. Sylvestris

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 19:39:21 -0800

44 lines

Re: P. Sylvestris

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 18:53:40 -0600

27 lines

Re: P. Sylvestris

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:33:48 -0500

70 lines

New Thread

Pamphlet 225 and John Shortridge

Pamphlet 225 and John Shortridge

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 14:32:41 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

Performance Practice Review 13 (2008)

Performance Practice Review 13 (2008)

Robert Zappulla <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:39:19 -0800

58 lines

New Thread

peruvian harpsichord soundboard wood

peruvian harpsichord soundboard wood

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 21:11:46 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Pioneer Italian Harpsichords

Re: Pioneer Italian Harpsichords

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 07:59:56 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Pioneer Italian Harpsichords (west coast)

Pioneer Italian Harpsichords (west coast)

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 10:48:29 -0800

37 lines

Re: Pioneer Italian Harpsichords (west coast)

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:05:31 -0500

46 lines

Re: Pioneer Italian Harpsichords (west coast)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:41:50 -0700

54 lines

Re: Pioneer Italian Harpsichords (west coast)

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:36:41 -0800

16 lines

New Thread

problem with F

problem with F

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2009 20:22:30 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

ribbing under bridge

ribbing under bridge

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2009 08:24:50 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Shortridge again

Shortridge again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 14:51:56 +0800

40 lines

New Thread

So. California concert

So. California concert

Kenneth Bloomfield <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 15:40:22 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Sodi / Re: Introduction and question

Sodi / Re: Introduction and question

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2009 19:04:43 +0100

51 lines

Re: Sodi / Re: Introduction and question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 07:46:32 +0100

25 lines

Re: Sodi / Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 13:43:03 +0100

16 lines

Re: Sodi / Re: Introduction and question

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 16:17:55 +0100

60 lines

Re: Sodi / Re: Introduction and question

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 19:16:02 +0100

22 lines

Re: Sodi / Re: Introduction and question

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2009 21:36:01 +0100

93 lines

New Thread

soundboards for easy to make harpsichords

soundboards for easy to make harpsichords

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 07:14:54 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

stereo beating cont.

Re: stereo beating cont.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 10:10:15 +0100

35 lines

Re: stereo beating cont.

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:14:05 -0700

35 lines

Re: stereo beating cont.

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:27:18 -0700

42 lines

Re: stereo beating cont.

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2009 20:51:09 +0100

29 lines

Re: stereo beating cont.

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 00:30:34 -0500

24 lines

Re: stereo beating cont.

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 09:02:56 -0500

33 lines

Re: stereo beating cont.

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 15:38:02 -0500

25 lines

Re: stereo beating cont.

D M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2009 17:01:51 -0600

47 lines

New Thread

Stress and Gap spacers

Stress and Gap spacers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 08:44:28 +0000

25 lines

Re: Stress and Gap spacers

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 13:50:13 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Swell harpsichord

Swell harpsichord

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 09:57:52 -0600

13 lines

Re: Swell harpsichord

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 11:25:34 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

Sweller harpsichords

Sweller harpsichords

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 10:00:52 -0600

13 lines

Sweller harpsichords

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 17:25:10 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

tempis fugit & sic transit ...

tempis fugit & sic transit ...

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 05:53:45 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

the english rococo

the english rococo

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 12:47:43 +0100

33 lines

Re: the english rococo

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 10:04:18 -0500

17 lines

Re: the english rococo

Peter Thresh-BH <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:31:08 -0000

28 lines

Re: the english rococo

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:56:14 +0100

21 lines

Re: the english rococo

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 15:02:18 +0800

60 lines

Re: the English rococo

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 16:46:26 -0500

39 lines

Re: the english rococo

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 01:15:06 +0100

34 lines

Re: the english rococo

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2009 21:51:56 +0800

45 lines

Re: the english rococo

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 09:13:42 -0000

29 lines

Re: the english rococo

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 16:18:54 -0500

36 lines

Re: the english rococo

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 21:51:39 -0000

53 lines

New Thread

The glory of PAINT

The glory of PAINT

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 07:17:49 +0000

24 lines

Re: The glory of PAINT

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2009 15:53:13 -0500

17 lines

Re: The glory of PAINT

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 08:30:17 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

The Other Vater

The Other Vater

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 12:51:20 -0800

13 lines

New Thread

Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25?

Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25?

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 13:00:29 +0000

18 lines

Re: Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25?

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:24:38 -0500

14 lines

Re: Three Early Froberger Toccatas in Chigi Q.IV.25?

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 04:18:38 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 11:45:20 -0800

17 lines

Re: To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 12:33:24 -0800

30 lines

Re: To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 15:16:45 -0600

21 lines

Re: To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 06:48:35 +0100

27 lines

Re: To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:09:39 -0500

21 lines

Re: To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 10:25:20 -0500

20 lines

Re: To drill or not to Drill tuning pins ?

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2009 18:38:11 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

Triple Concerto ? ?

Triple Concerto ? ?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2009 08:32:28 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

Two little unrelated points

Two little unrelated points

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:29:44 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

Two more West Coast Makers of Italian Harpsichords

Two more West Coast Makers of Italian Harpsichords

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2009 19:12:23 -0800

15 lines

New Thread

was gap spacers

was gap spacers

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 10:38:48 +0800

34 lines

Re: was gap spacers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 18:08:31 +0000

33 lines

Re: was gap spacers

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 19:29:23 +0100

41 lines

Re: was gap spacers

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:06:00 -0800

51 lines

Re: was gap spacers

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2009 12:36:23 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

who's making/restoring what

Re: who's making/restoring what

Micaela Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 14:53:31 -0800

27 lines

Re: who's making/restoring what

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2009 00:33:16 +0100

14 lines

Re: who's making/restoring what

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2009 19:01:18 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Willard Martin

Willard Martin

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2009 14:57:46 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Zuckerman jacks and wire

Zuckerman jacks and wire

Joseph Gascho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2009 15:39:41 -0500

17 lines

Re: Zuckerman jacks and wire

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2009 10:54:43 -0500

28 lines

Re: Zuckerman jacks and wire

Joseph Gascho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 08:39:39 -0500

36 lines

Re: Zuckerman jacks and wire

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 16:50:49 +0000

46 lines

Re: Zuckerman jacks and wire

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2009 19:40:54 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

[Fwd: Troubling news for La Petite Bande - let's do something to help]

[Fwd: Troubling news for La Petite Bande - let's do something to help]

Johan van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 15:51:54 +0100

34 lines

Re: [Fwd: Troubling news for La Petite Bande - let's do something to help]

R. D. Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2009 16:12:13 +0100

45 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu