LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


January 2009


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"False" identities (25 messages)
"False" identities - Webern (2 messages)
"False" identities, OT. and so on (1 message)
'Semi-meantone' semi-understood (16 messages)
(Sigh) - Sabathil! (6 messages)
-Harpsichord damping (3 messages)
Accidental identity (3 messages)
administrative (1 message)
Administrative - IF ONLY (2 messages)
Administrative -- all read (10 messages)
AMS paper question (7 messages)
an apology to the list (1 message)
Anonymity/Pseudonymity (7 messages)
ANother rcording of an historical harpsicord (1 message)
Another tragedy (1 message)
apologetic note (6 messages)
Apology to Officer Bunning (1 message)
Are my messages coming in duplicate? (1 message)
Articulation noises, tuning with 4' undamped, (2 messages)
Asperen, Before-the-beat, (and pleeease nothing about Neumann) (2 messages)
Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann (3 messages)
Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann 2 (1 message)
Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann-Chopin! (1 message)
At the inauguration - fingerless gloves! (3 messages)
Atonal music and non-ET, was "False" identities (2 messages)
Atonal music and non-ET/further permustations (1 message)
Bach and his times (3 messages)
Bach temperament: Lehman vs Barnes (5 messages)
Bach tempi? (2 messages)
bad! (1 message)
be nice. (11 messages)
been away (2 messages)
beginner's guide to temperaments (5 messages)
beurmann (1 message)
Beurmann's supposed claviorgan, was New CDs on Historic Harpsichords (2 messages)
Big clavichord (1 message)
British Theses (2 messages)
Brookshire recital instrument (16 messages)
Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question (10 messages)
carving (1 message)
cd's (3 messages)
Chikering -Dolmetsch (2 messages)
chromatic voicing (16 messages)
clavichords in Bohemia (3 messages)
Congratulations to Lutz Bungart (4 messages)
Corrette étiré (3 messages)
could someone explain (18 messages)
could someone explain - stop now please (1 message)
Courtesy and behaviour are no gift from "above" (1 message)
damping again pt. 2 (2 messages)
David Jensen's harpsichord (1 message)
dejection and relief (1 message)
delrin jack (3 messages)
Di Veroli on inharmonicity (long - DO NOT QUOTE!!!) (3 messages)
drawknife, using cutting tools towards you (1 message)
Driven to Digest (1 message)
Driven to Digest x 2 (1 message)
Duffin's book - a review (with excerpts here) and it's reception history (1 message)
Dussek plea - sonata no.18 (5 messages)
DV on inharmonicity (1 message)
Early Music (1 message)
ebay (4 messages)
English spinet (1 message)
English spinets (6 messages)
Enlightenment! (4 messages)
Existential Musings on the Nature or Identity (5 messages)
Folding Harpsichords (1 message)
For Claudio (and others interested): List etiquette on quotation and subject lines (2 messages)
Fore Sale: de Blaise Dual Manual Harpsichord - Fixer Upper $500 (4 messages)
Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments (7 messages)
Formulating the Research Problem ... (1 message)
Friday Monthly Concert in St. Albans (1 message)
Froberger (1 message)
Froberger - tuners thanks (1 message)
Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues (3 messages)
Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues (1 message)
Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues (1 message)
Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the WTC-squiggles (2 messages)
Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles (26 messages)
Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - Loop holes (2 messages)
Fwd: Loops (1 message)
german instruments (1 message)
Google Map and HPSCHD-L pins (2 messages)
Hamburg Jakobi, Norden, St.Maximin, modified meantone and temperament ordinaire (was: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood) (2 messages)
Harpsichord damping (1 message)
Harpsichord damping - again - sigh! (1 message)
Harpsichord damping-2 (17 messages)
Harpsichord damping-2-Damping the 4' (1 message)
Harpsichord Encasement (3 messages)
Harpsichord Literature of 20th century instruments (2 messages)
Haydn Year (1 message)
How Korgs work (3 messages)
HPSCHD-L could someone explain (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 21 Jan 2009 (#2009-29) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 3 Jan 2009 to 4 Jan 2009 (#2009-5) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8) (6 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 6 Jan 2009 to 7 Jan 2009 (#2009-9) (4 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Jan 2009 (#2009-11) (4 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 (#2009-14) (4 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 to 10 Jan 2009 - Special issue (#2009-15) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L the world might be a better place... (2 messages)
Human ear/brain as signal processor (7 messages)
I'm convinced! Was: the world might be a better place, heads of state, etc... (2 messages)
Ibo's gobbledegook (1 message)
Ibo's interesting although insincere "Bach" temp from the drawing (1 message)
Identify This Music (2 messages)
Identify This Music - MP3 File (1 message)
Identify This Music - MP3 File-Fake Vivaldi (3 messages)
Jeeze guys, what's wrong with you? (2 messages)
Joseph Payne's "Space-Out Bach" - Anybody Multitrack With Their Harpsichord? (1 message)
Julian's question and Mark Lindley's experience in the philosophical history of science (1 message)
Kirkpatrick (1 message)
korg (1 message)
korg as tuning fork (15 messages)
Korg placebo and a Froberger question (7 messages)
Korg vs. Violab (1 message)
Korgies:-) (7 messages)
koster book/article (3 messages)
La Bell Homicide (1 message)
La Belle Homicide (8 messages)
last words? (2 messages)
Latin plea (5 messages)
Latin-American clavichords (2 messages)
Lehman's Bach's tempera ment – E- major = worst key? (1 message)
Lehman's Bach's tempera ment – E-major = worst key? (2 messages)
Lehman's Bach's temperament (11 messages)
Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection? (1 message)
Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues (2 messages)
Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection? (3 messages)
Lehman's Bach's temperament (Ibo's message unencrypted) (1 message)
Lehman's Bach's temperament - (2 messages)
Lehman's Bach's temperament - (not really Bach, but once again) 55-ET (1 message)
Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation (1 message)
Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles (2 messages)
Lehman's Bach's temperament - Loop holes (1 message)
Leonhardt Jubilee edition (13 messages)
Les Barricades Misterieuses (10 messages)
Les grâces in concert this Saturday: Berkeley, CA (2 messages)
List matters (1 message)
loops (12 messages)
Loops ---glue (1 message)
Loops part 2 (1 message)
Loops--OT**** (1 message)
loops: addendum (1 message)
Lutz Bungart (2 messages)
Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (6 messages)
Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing) (10 messages)
Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death? (6 messages)
Math/Science geeks vs musicians (13 messages)
Michele Benuzzi Sydney recital (1 message)
Mnemonics (was: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved ...) (1 message)
More French Butchery! (4 messages)
More on non-legato (4 messages)
more super glue (1 message)
Motto for a new harpsichord (20 messages)
Musical Instruments: History, Technology, and Performance of Instruments of Western Music" (Oxford UP) (2 messages)
nails through bridge (2 messages)
Neupert Harpischord to give away (3 messages)
New CDs on Historic Harpsichords (5 messages)
New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen (3 messages)
New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen-Rameau's non-legato (5 messages)
Nice recording on virginal & harpsichord (3 messages)
no content - please ignore (1 message)
Numerology in Bach, was Bach tempi? (2 messages)
O.T. New Gamba Piece by Vox Member (1 message)
Occam's razor (1 message)
Offlist reply - Re: Driven to Digest x 2 (3 messages)
old essay, for what it's worth (1 message)
On Harpsichord Tone Quality - Not a Harpsichord At All (1 message)
On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification (16 messages)
One-stop temperament superstore? (3 messages)
order of tuning stops (was overthinking inharmonicity) (2 messages)
OT calligram (1 message)
OT list misuse (2 messages)
Our numbers (1 message)
Overdamping experiment (1 message)
overthinking inharmonicity (1 message)
Owen's rant (1 message)
parallel perfect consonances, (1 message)
parallel perfect consonances, was Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann 2 (1 message)
Philosophy (2 messages)
Phishing (6 messages)
Phishing (OT from the start) (1 message)
Phishing Mac vs PC OT (7 messages)
Playing.... getting worse. (14 messages)
Playing.... getting worse. - other child wonders (2 messages)
Playing.... getting worse. - Then Multi-track (1 message)
plectrum angle (2 messages)
Posting requirements (1 message)
Postings (1 message)
pre-owned hpschd in NW (1 message)
preposterously huge clavichords (1 message)
pushing the Werckmeister envelope (1 message)
question about a silly but cosmic temperament (1 message)
question for my colleagues (7 messages)
Rameau's non-legato, and so on (16 messages)
Rameau's non-legato, and so on-CAREFUL PLEASE!! (2 messages)
Re. could someone explain (4 messages)
re. trivium (1 message)
Reflections on the Dulce Melos (2 messages)
RESOLVED - Motto for a new harpsichord (2 messages)
Response to: Administrative -- all read (1 message)
routing was carving (17 messages)
settling, was staggering (3 messages)
Sotheby's musical instrument auction catalog resource (2 messages)
Sound Sample Dulce Melos replica (2 messages)
Sparschuh speculation (1 message)
Staggering (11 messages)
Staggering, Mexican sample (11 messages)
stereo beating cont. (2 messages)
String length interpolation (1 message)
stringing (17 messages)
super glue (2 messages)
super glue and Titebond (1 message)
super glue(s) (3 messages)
Taskin gap (5 messages)
Temperament guide (4 messages)
Temperament guide and Duffin (18 messages)
temperament MP3 files (2 messages)
Temperaments: Hamburgian, DrugStore, and otherwise (5 messages)
Temperaments: Music not mathematics! (2 messages)
Thank you Mr. Frye (3 messages)
the world might be a better place (bis hodie) (1 message)
the world might be a better place... (18 messages)
the world might be a better place... if politicians could play in a Bach hpschd-concerto (25 messages)
the world might be a better place...utterly OT (1 message)
Think it's fixed now (2 messages)
This Morning's Postings! (1 message)
This Morning's Postings! and the real world and harpsichord content. (2 messages)
thomas's temperament book (1 message)
Totally OT!!!******* (1 message)
Tuning a La Mancha (2 messages)
tuning... (1 message)
UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENTS and BAROQUE FINGERINGS (22 messages)
UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENTS and BAROQUE FINGERINGS and costs and manners (1 message)
Unequal Temperaments and Baroque Fingerings-a suggestion (1 message)
UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENTS and BAROQUE FINGERINGS-B&W future edition? (4 messages)
UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENTS and BAROQUE FINGERINGS-not printing the latter (1 message)
UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENTS and BAROQUE FINGERINGS-short and long (1 message)
UNEQUAL TEMPERAMENTS and others (1 message)
Unequal Temperaments book - Sound examples (1 message)
V & A catalogue (3 messages)
Valenti's Scarlatti (6 messages)
Vedutisti (1 message)
Vulture Quills (2 messages)
Washington County (NY) Harpsichordists? (1 message)
weight (3 messages)
weight / spring strength (1 message)
Werckmeister Continuo (1 message)
Who can bear criticism? (1 message)
William Post Ross (3 messages)
wolf-splitting, Purcell E minor / unexpected benefits (2 messages)
yes! (1 message)
yet another harpsichord-playing head of state - ? (6 messages)
You are right (1 message)
zumpe (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"False" identities

"False" identities

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:35:16 -0600

20 lines

Re: "False" identities

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:45:41 +0100

24 lines

Re: "False" identities

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:54:09 -0500

47 lines

Re: "False" identities

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:00:29 -0500

25 lines

Re: "False" identities

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:04:51 -0600

28 lines

Re: "False" identities

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:21:28 -0600

28 lines

Re: "False" identities

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:56:56 -0700

16 lines

Re: "False" identities

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:20:54 +0100

47 lines

Re: "False" identities

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:32:36 -0500

22 lines

Re: "False" identities

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:41:36 -0500

33 lines

Re: "False" identities

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:44:08 +0100

16 lines

Re: "False" identities

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:57:22 -0500

16 lines

Re: "False" identities

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:13:42 -0500

32 lines

Re: "False" identities

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:16:20 -0800

46 lines

Re: "False" identities

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:27:17 -0800

23 lines

Re: "False" identities

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:09:36 -0500

40 lines

Re: "False" identities

BEDersch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:03:44 -0800

35 lines

Re: "False" identities

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:12:04 -0500

26 lines

Re: "False" identities

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 22:14:45 -0500

30 lines

Re: "False" identities

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:27:15 -0500

85 lines

Re: "False" identities

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:53:39 -0700

11 lines

Re: "False" identities

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:09:47 -0500

32 lines

Re: "False" identities

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:22:32 -0500

45 lines

Re: "False" identities

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:22:21 -0800

20 lines

Re: "False" identities

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:18:09 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

"False" identities - Webern

Re: "False" identities - Webern

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:57:24 -0500

30 lines

Re: "False" identities - Webern

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:10:05 -0600

52 lines

New Thread

"False" identities, OT. and so on

Re: "False" identities, OT. and so on

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:51:27 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:28:57 +0100

50 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:53:34 -0800

25 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:20:29 -0000

80 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:10:27 -0000

53 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:55:52 -0800

29 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 21:21:35 -0000

36 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:45:25 +0100

39 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:15:53 -0500

36 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 20:18:30 +0100

27 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:28:04 -0500

29 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:54:01 -0500

47 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 16:57:23 -0500

37 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:14:16 -0800

47 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:17:10 -0800

27 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 16:59:39 +0100

30 lines

Re: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:19:42 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

(Sigh) - Sabathil!

(Sigh) - Sabathil!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:34:21 -0800

39 lines

Re: (Sigh) - Sabathil!

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:47:41 +0100

99 lines

Re: (Sigh) - Sabathil!

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:14:14 -0500

118 lines

Re: (Sigh) - Sabathil!

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:19:18 -0600

13 lines

Re: (Sigh) - Sabathil!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:14:26 -0500

52 lines

Re: (Sigh) - Sabathil!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 17:20:42 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

-Harpsichord damping

-Harpsichord damping

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:56:18 -0000

70 lines

Re: -Harpsichord damping

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:40:19 +0100

26 lines

Re: -Harpsichord damping

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:37:24 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Accidental identity

Accidental identity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 08:33:34 +0100

94 lines

Re: Accidental identity

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:39:51 -0500

99 lines

Re: Accidental identity

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:29:31 -0500

251 lines

New Thread

administrative

administrative

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:23:55 -0600

12 lines

New Thread

Administrative - IF ONLY

Administrative - IF ONLY

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:53:56 -0800

43 lines

Re: Administrative - IF ONLY

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:22:16 -0600

64 lines

New Thread

Administrative -- all read

Administrative -- all read

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 15:43:55 -0600

28 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:10:12 -0800

38 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 14:15:26 -0800

44 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Turpin D'Isigny-Ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:32:09 +0100

21 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:58:13 -0500

24 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Turpin D'Isigny-Ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 00:08:18 +0100

18 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:24:39 -0500

40 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:47:01 +0100

30 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:49:59 +0100

27 lines

Re: Administrative -- all read

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 08:56:11 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

AMS paper question

AMS paper question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:45:40 -0800

18 lines

Re: AMS paper question

Dominique Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:40:03 EST

31 lines

Re: AMS paper question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 12:48:39 -0800

19 lines

Re: AMS paper question

Dominique Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:54:31 EST

24 lines

Re: AMS paper question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:07:16 -0800

20 lines

Re: AMS paper question

Turpin D'Isigny-Ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 00:48:59 +0100

37 lines

Re: AMS paper question

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:07:21 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

an apology to the list

an apology to the list

BEDersch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:39:48 -0800

15 lines

New Thread

Anonymity/Pseudonymity

Anonymity/Pseudonymity

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:02:01 -0500

42 lines

Re: Anonymity/Pseudonymity

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:41:14 -0800

58 lines

Re: Anonymity/Pseudonymity

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 19:52:11 +0000

30 lines

Re: Anonymity/Pseudonymity

John Erskine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:00:18 +0000

38 lines

Re: Anonymity/Pseudonymity

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:36:48 -0000

25 lines

Re: Anonymity/Pseudonymity

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:45:59 -0500

23 lines

Re: Anonymity/Pseudonymity

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:37:20 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

ANother rcording of an historical harpsicord

ANother rcording of an historical harpsicord

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 11:30:41 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Another tragedy

Another tragedy

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:13:54 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

apologetic note

apologetic note

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:51:22 +0100

38 lines

Re: apologetic note

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:39:57 +0000

28 lines

Re: apologetic note

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:12:53 +0100

17 lines

Re: apologetic note

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:50:25 -0600

29 lines

Re: apologetic note

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:57:32 -0600

27 lines

Re: apologetic note

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 23:36:14 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

Apology to Officer Bunning

Apology to Officer Bunning

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 16:08:33 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Are my messages coming in duplicate?

Are my messages coming in duplicate?

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:50:15 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Articulation noises, tuning with 4' undamped,

Articulation noises, tuning with 4' undamped,

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:42:20 -0800

61 lines

Re: Articulation noises, tuning with 4' undamped,

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:54:56 -0000

111 lines

New Thread

Asperen, Before-the-beat, (and pleeease nothing about Neumann)

Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, (and pleeease nothing about Neumann)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:31:29 -0500

43 lines

Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, (and pleeease nothing about Neumann)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:21:33 +0100

79 lines

New Thread

Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann

Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:04:05 -0000

92 lines

Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:43:10 +0100

26 lines

Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 08:58:27 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann 2

Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann 2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:09:18 -0000

19 lines

New Thread

Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann-Chopin!

Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann-Chopin!

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:07:00 -0000

62 lines

New Thread

At the inauguration - fingerless gloves!

At the inauguration - fingerless gloves!

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:11:14 -0500

17 lines

Re: At the inauguration - fingerless gloves!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:07:02 -0500

40 lines

Re: At the inauguration - fingerless gloves!

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 05:32:41 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Atonal music and non-ET, was "False" identities

Re: Atonal music and non-ET, was "False" identities

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:14:42 -0500

24 lines

Re: Atonal music and non-ET, was "False" identities

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:23:47 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Atonal music and non-ET/further permustations

Re: Atonal music and non-ET/further permustations

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 15:45:40 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Bach and his times

Bach and his times

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 10:23:41 -0500

68 lines

Re: Bach and his times

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 16:09:46 +0000

54 lines

Re: Bach and his times

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 11:23:46 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Bach temperament: Lehman vs Barnes

Bach temperament: Lehman vs Barnes

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:38:02 -0000

83 lines

Re: Bach temperament: Lehman vs Barnes

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:59:14 -0500

76 lines

Re: Bach temperament: Lehman vs Barnes

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:23:21 -0500

29 lines

Re: Bach temperament: Lehman vs Barnes

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:01:38 +0100

21 lines

Re: Bach temperament: Lehman vs Barnes

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:40:42 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

Bach tempi?

Re: Bach tempi?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:30:18 +0000

15 lines

Re: Bach tempi?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:10:10 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

bad!

bad!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:45:13 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

be nice.

be nice.

Kate Swytak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 04:00:53 -0800

31 lines

Re: be nice.

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 20:50:09 -0500

30 lines

Re: be nice.

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 07:29:57 -0800

26 lines

Re: be nice.

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:49:40 +0100

18 lines

Re: be nice.

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:14:04 -0800

26 lines

Re: be nice.

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:45:38 -0500

42 lines

Re: be nice.

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:18:46 -0600

26 lines

Re: be nice.

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:47:21 +0000

21 lines

Re: be nice.

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 15:04:02 -0000

28 lines

Re: be nice.

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:35:16 -0500

41 lines

Re: be nice.

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 08:53:45 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

been away

been away

D M <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:10:29 -0600

17 lines

Re: been away

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:33:09 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

beginner's guide to temperaments

beginner's guide to temperaments

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 11:22:02 +0100

19 lines

Re: beginner's guide to temperaments

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:55:29 -0500

40 lines

Re: beginner's guide to temperaments

BEDersch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 05:37:54 -0800

28 lines

Re: beginner's guide to temperaments

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:28:00 -0800

25 lines

Re: beginner's guide to temperaments

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:25:04 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

beurmann

beurmann

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 18:40:16 +1100

13 lines

New Thread

Beurmann's supposed claviorgan, was New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

Beurmann's supposed claviorgan, was New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:57:27 +0100

44 lines

Re: Beurmann's supposed claviorgan, was New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 10:30:49 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Big clavichord

Big clavichord

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 08:12:31 -0800

85 lines

New Thread

British Theses

British Theses

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:54:20 -0500

24 lines

Re: British Theses

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 13:31:44 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Brookshire recital instrument

Brookshire recital instrument

Ted Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:09:10 -0800

20 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Dongsok Shin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 14:58:09 EST

38 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 16:18:57 -0500

33 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:24:07 -0500

104 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 08:23:37 +0100

156 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:58:30 +0100

25 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:17:14 +0100

20 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:33:51 +0100

19 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:33:59 +0100

24 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 16:29:21 +0100

21 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:16:32 -0500

24 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 19:36:21 +0100

42 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 15:01:37 -0500

24 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 21:43:23 +0100

125 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 17:17:12 -0500

26 lines

Re: Brookshire recital instrument

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:25:35 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 02:10:57 -0500

122 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 23:58:41 -0800

43 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 03:28:02 -0500

26 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:27:38 -0500

16 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 16:54:12 -0500

47 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 19:50:22 -0500

23 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:39:03 -0800

18 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 21:09:05 -0500

23 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 00:57:03 -0500

33 lines

Re: Brookshire Recital Jan 11 question

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:05:56 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

carving

Re: carving

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:22:18 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

cd's

cd's

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:37:02 -0500

26 lines

cd's

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:28:58 +0100

29 lines

Re: cd's

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:23:08 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Chikering -Dolmetsch

Chikering -Dolmetsch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:07:40 -0800

16 lines

Re: Chikering -Dolmetsch

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:21:46 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

chromatic voicing

chromatic voicing

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 22:48:35 +0100

17 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 23:01:48 +0100

25 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:28:06 -0500

26 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:35:52 +0100

46 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:09:43 +0100

24 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:29:56 +0100

50 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:37:29 +0100

21 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:14:34 +0000

41 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 10:05:55 -0500

118 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:41:24 -0500

85 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 18:48:52 +0100

40 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:45:07 +0100

20 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:35:09 +0100

76 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 01:30:39 -0500

28 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 08:30:31 +0100

18 lines

Re: chromatic voicing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:19:13 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

clavichords in Bohemia

Re: clavichords in Bohemia

Paul Rabin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:50:12 -0500

35 lines

Re: clavichords in Bohemia

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 21:42:49 -0000

96 lines

Re: clavichords in Bohemia

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 11:13:54 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Congratulations to Lutz Bungart

Congratulations to Lutz Bungart

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 17:25:25 -0800

14 lines

Re: Congratulations to Lutz Bungart

Anne%20Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:27:10 +0000

31 lines

Re: Congratulations to Lutz Bungart

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:51:08 -0500

27 lines

Re: Congratulations to Lutz Bungart

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 03:50:10 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Corrette étiré

Corrette étiré

Claude Knee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:53:19 +0100

118 lines

Re: Corrette étiré

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:19:38 -0600

22 lines

Re: Corrette étiré

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:29:04 -0000

51 lines

New Thread

could someone explain

could someone explain

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:07:38 -0500

27 lines

Re: could someone explain

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:31:06 -0500

24 lines

Re: could someone explain

Turpin D'Isigny-Ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 20:15:43 +0100

23 lines

Re: could someone explain

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:28:43 -0500

79 lines

Re: could someone explain

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:50:07 -0800

40 lines

Re: could someone explain

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 12:57:43 -0800

60 lines

Re: could someone explain

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 15:47:19 +0100

18 lines

Re: could someone explain

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:36:22 -0500

31 lines

Re: could someone explain

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 07:45:44 -0800

47 lines

Re: could someone explain

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:48:12 -0500

23 lines

Re: could someone explain

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:52:31 -0500

38 lines

Re: could someone explain

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 13:03:01 -0600

55 lines

Re: could someone explain

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:31:17 -0500

23 lines

Re: could someone explain

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:46:00 -0500

132 lines

Re: could someone explain

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:12:41 +0100

14 lines

Re: could someone explain

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 16:44:55 -0500

33 lines

Re: could someone explain

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 21:20:24 -0500

24 lines

Re: could someone explain

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 22:15:26 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

could someone explain - stop now please

Re: could someone explain - stop now please

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:42:24 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Courtesy and behaviour are no gift from "above"

Courtesy and behaviour are no gift from "above"

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 11:47:29 -0500

102 lines

New Thread

damping again pt. 2

damping again pt. 2

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:22:46 -0800

30 lines

Re: damping again pt. 2

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 23:32:38 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

David Jensen's harpsichord

David Jensen's harpsichord

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 22:24:25 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

dejection and relief

dejection and relief

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 15:05:14 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

delrin jack

delrin jack

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 05:54:25 -0800

10 lines

Re: delrin jack

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 09:06:35 -0500

26 lines

Re: delrin jack

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 10:50:23 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Di Veroli on inharmonicity (long - DO NOT QUOTE!!!)

Di Veroli on inharmonicity (long - DO NOT QUOTE!!!)

Claude Knee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:30:43 +0100

347 lines

Re: Di Veroli on inharmonicity (long - DO NOT QUOTE!!!)

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 05:11:10 -0500

22 lines

Re: Di Veroli on inharmonicity (long - DO NOT QUOTE!!!)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 15:47:52 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

drawknife, using cutting tools towards you

drawknife, using cutting tools towards you

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:36:26 +1100

35 lines

New Thread

Driven to Digest

Driven to Digest

George Haeh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:09:13 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Driven to Digest x 2

Re: Driven to Digest x 2

Your Full Name <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:53:53 EST

28 lines

New Thread

Duffin's book - a review (with excerpts here) and it's reception history

Duffin's book - a review (with excerpts here) and it's reception history

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 09:42:09 -0500

222 lines

New Thread

Dussek plea - sonata no.18

Dussek plea - sonata no.18

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:58:12 +0100

29 lines

Re: Dussek plea - sonata no.18

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:03:47 -0500

52 lines

Dussek plea - sonata no.18

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:38:08 +0100

26 lines

Re: Dussek plea - sonata no.18

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:17:57 -0500

46 lines

Re: Dussek plea - sonata no.18

Davida March <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 05:33:27 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

DV on inharmonicity

DV on inharmonicity

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:14:37 -0000

93 lines

New Thread

Early Music

Early Music

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:36:15 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

ebay

ebay

Ray Ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:49:59 -0500

17 lines

Re: ebay

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 19:00:59 +1100

27 lines

Re: ebay

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:49:11 -0500

40 lines

Re: ebay

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:13:21 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

English spinet

Re: English spinet

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:28:48 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

English spinets

English spinets

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:57:59 +0100

16 lines

Re: English spinets

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 05:11:45 -0800

11 lines

Re: English spinets

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:40:47 -0000

31 lines

Re: English spinets

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 18:02:20 +0100

26 lines

Re: English spinets

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:38:02 -0800

26 lines

Re: English spinets

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 11:47:47 -0000

27 lines

New Thread

Enlightenment!

Enlightenment!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:37:48 -0800

41 lines

Re: Enlightenment!

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 15:29:41 -0500

16 lines

Re: Enlightenment!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 22:06:34 -0500

28 lines

Re: Enlightenment!

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:12:05 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Existential Musings on the Nature or Identity

Existential Musings on the Nature or Identity

Claude Knee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:02:07 +0100

198 lines

Re: Existential Musings on the Nature or Identity

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:20:48 -0600

31 lines

Re: Existential Musings on the Nature or Identity

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:24:28 -0500

56 lines

Re: Existential Musings on the Nature or Identity

Willem Vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 13:23:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: Existential Musings on the Nature or Identity

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 15:28:12 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Folding Harpsichords

Folding Harpsichords

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 07:27:40 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

For Claudio (and others interested): List etiquette on quotation and subject lines

For Claudio (and others interested): List etiquette on quotation and subject lines

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:38:49 -0500

36 lines

Re: For Claudio (and others interested): List etiquette on quotation and subject lines

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:02:24 -0000

34 lines

New Thread

Fore Sale: de Blaise Dual Manual Harpsichord - Fixer Upper $500

Fore Sale: de Blaise Dual Manual Harpsichord - Fixer Upper $500

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 21:35:56 -0500

22 lines

Re: Fore Sale: de Blaise Dual Manual Harpsichord - Fixer Upper $500

Garret Traylor <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:47:29 -0500

47 lines

Re: Fore Sale: de Blaise Dual Manual Harpsichord - Fixer Upper $500

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:45:25 -0800

19 lines

Re: Fore Sale: de Blaise Dual Manual Harpsichord - Fixer Upper $500

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 22:33:42 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:53:53 -0500

118 lines

Re: Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:52:30 +0000

35 lines

Re: Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:19:34 -0000

26 lines

Re: Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:24:12 +0100

19 lines

Re: Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:56:52 +0000

49 lines

Re: Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:11:44 -0500

28 lines

Re: Formulating the reasearch problem - Bach WTC title page and ornaments

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 22:49:29 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Formulating the Research Problem ...

Re: Formulating the Research Problem ...

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:17:35 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Friday Monthly Concert in St. Albans

Friday Monthly Concert in St. Albans

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:38:27 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

Froberger

Re: Froberger

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:46:51 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Froberger - tuners thanks

Froberger - tuners thanks

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:05:22 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:40:12 -0500

109 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 14:47:58 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 07:06:31 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:24:58 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:40:39 +0100

82 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the WTC-squiggles

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:19:26 +0100

193 lines

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the WTC-squiggles

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:42:11 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:58:01 -0500

61 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 10:19:25 -0600

93 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:41:44 +0000

47 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:47:43 -0500

36 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 18:05:24 +0000

23 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 13:16:28 -0500

36 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 14:26:50 -0500

67 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 12:52:28 -0800

144 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 23:38:42 +0100

83 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 06:58:55 -0500

96 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 07:09:41 -0500

34 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:33:36 -0500

56 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:52:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:16:54 -0500

68 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:49:36 -0500

34 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:55:56 -0500

39 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:17:19 -0500

59 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:45:44 -0500

79 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 11:47:15 -0500

38 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 12:29:36 -0500

89 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:06:11 -0500

145 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:56:25 -0500

72 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 13:11:40 -0600

25 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:03:27 -0500

162 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:53:05 -0500

34 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 12:46:21 -0800

173 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - Loop holes

Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - Loop holes

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:46:17 +0100

78 lines

Re: Fwd: Lehman's Bach's temperament - Loop holes

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:25:01 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Loops

Fwd: Loops

David Griffiths <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:26:24 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

german instruments

german instruments

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:19:38 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Google Map and HPSCHD-L pins

Google Map and HPSCHD-L pins

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 23:16:09 -0000

21 lines

Re: Google Map and HPSCHD-L pins

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 19:59:42 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Hamburg Jakobi, Norden, St.Maximin, modified meantone and temperament ordinaire (was: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood)

Re: Hamburg Jakobi, Norden, St.Maximin, modified meantone and temperament ordinaire (was: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 10:22:13 -0500

190 lines

Re: Hamburg Jakobi, Norden, St.Maximin, modified meantone and temperament ordinaire (was: 'Semi-meantone' semi-understood)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:28:23 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord damping

Re: Harpsichord damping

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:32:31 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord damping - again - sigh!

Re: Harpsichord damping - again - sigh!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:28:08 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord damping-2

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 19:48:44 -0000

93 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:02:05 -0000

54 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 23:20:10 -0000

87 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 21:07:24 -0500

23 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:25:21 +0000

46 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:57:06 -0000

65 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:22:09 +0100

26 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:44:48 +0000

47 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:40:20 -0000

72 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 07:00:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:50:43 +0100

17 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:21:15 -0500

20 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 14:47:25 +0000

69 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:36:34 -0500

21 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 19:37:54 +0100

30 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 18:58:15 -0000

49 lines

Re: Harpsichord damping-2

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 09:11:26 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord damping-2-Damping the 4'

Re: Harpsichord damping-2-Damping the 4'

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:03:14 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Encasement

Harpsichord Encasement

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:51:35 -0500

12 lines

Re: Harpsichord Encasement

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:32:06 -0600

17 lines

Re: Harpsichord Encasement

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:02:32 +1100

27 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Literature of 20th century instruments

Harpsichord Literature of 20th century instruments

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:21:41 -0500

24 lines

Re: Harpsichord Literature of 20th century instruments

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 17:13:04 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Haydn Year

Haydn Year

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:05:47 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

How Korgs work

How Korgs work

Claude Knee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:19:07 +0100

96 lines

Re: How Korgs work

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:57:05 -0800

96 lines

Re: How Korgs work

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 14:32:12 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L could someone explain

Re: HPSCHD-L could someone explain

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:12:15 -0500

86 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L could someone explain

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 12:16:24 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 21 Jan 2009 (#2009-29)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 21 Jan 2009 (#2009-29)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 21:44:18 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 3 Jan 2009 to 4 Jan 2009 (#2009-5)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 3 Jan 2009 to 4 Jan 2009 (#2009-5)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:17:44 -0800

52 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 3 Jan 2009 to 4 Jan 2009 (#2009-5)

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:18:31 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:10:26 -0800

35 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:23:44 -0800

55 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:26:11 -0800

167 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 21:32:23 -0800

35 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:35:12 +0000

29 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Jan 2009 to 6 Jan 2009 (#2009-8)

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 12:29:33 -0000

66 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 6 Jan 2009 to 7 Jan 2009 (#2009-9)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 6 Jan 2009 to 7 Jan 2009 (#2009-9)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 21:31:17 -0800

99 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 6 Jan 2009 to 7 Jan 2009 (#2009-9)

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 08:16:37 +0100

97 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 6 Jan 2009 to 7 Jan 2009 (#2009-9)

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 07:20:10 -0800

39 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 6 Jan 2009 to 7 Jan 2009 (#2009-9)

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 16:00:22 -0000

33 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Jan 2009 (#2009-11)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Jan 2009 (#2009-11)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:22:39 -0800

57 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Jan 2009 (#2009-11)

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:13:07 -0500

24 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Jan 2009 (#2009-11)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:51:22 -0700

43 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Jan 2009 (#2009-11)

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:36:23 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 (#2009-14)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 (#2009-14)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 21:22:41 -0800

63 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 (#2009-14)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 21:29:07 -0800

42 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 (#2009-14)

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:21:22 +1100

23 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 (#2009-14)

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 19:34:54 +1100

33 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 to 10 Jan 2009 - Special issue (#2009-15)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 to 10 Jan 2009 - Special issue (#2009-15)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:50:57 -0800

55 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 9 Jan 2009 to 10 Jan 2009 - Special issue (#2009-15)

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 19:30:09 +1100

23 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L the world might be a better place...

Re: HPSCHD-L the world might be a better place...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:08:34 -0500

72 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L the world might be a better place...

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 14:27:57 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Human ear/brain as signal processor

Human ear/brain as signal processor

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 23:34:40 -0800

37 lines

Re: Human ear/brain as signal processor

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:34:53 -0700

35 lines

Re: Human ear/brain as signal processor

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:05:33 +0100

46 lines

Re: Human ear/brain as signal processor

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 10:22:29 -0500

74 lines

Re: Human ear/brain as signal processor

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:34:41 -0700

89 lines

Re: Human ear/brain as signal processor

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:10:35 +0100

19 lines

Re: Human ear/brain as signal processor

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:29:29 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

I'm convinced! Was: the world might be a better place, heads of state, etc...

I'm convinced! Was: the world might be a better place, heads of state, etc...

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:36:00 +0100

33 lines

Re: I'm convinced! Was: the world might be a better place, heads of state, etc...

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:19:44 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Ibo's gobbledegook

Re: Ibo's gobbledegook

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:08:12 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

Ibo's interesting although insincere "Bach" temp from the drawing

Ibo's interesting although insincere "Bach" temp from the drawing

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 22:08:53 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Identify This Music

Re: Identify This Music

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:25:30 +0100

12 lines

Re: Identify This Music

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:25:13 +1100

29 lines

New Thread

Identify This Music - MP3 File

Identify This Music - MP3 File

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 22:44:56 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Identify This Music - MP3 File-Fake Vivaldi

Re: Identify This Music - MP3 File-Fake Vivaldi

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 11:53:14 -0000

42 lines

Re: Identify This Music - MP3 File-Fake Vivaldi

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:08:11 -0500

25 lines

Re: Identify This Music - MP3 File-Fake Vivaldi

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:24:19 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Jeeze guys, what's wrong with you?

Jeeze guys, what's wrong with you?

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 10:40:35 -0800

32 lines

Re: Jeeze guys, what's wrong with you?

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 04:02:10 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Joseph Payne's "Space-Out Bach" - Anybody Multitrack With Their Harpsichord?

Joseph Payne's "Space-Out Bach" - Anybody Multitrack With Their Harpsichord?

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:43:04 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Julian's question and Mark Lindley's experience in the philosophical history of science

Julian's question and Mark Lindley's experience in the philosophical history of science

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 20:52:51 +0100

116 lines

New Thread

Kirkpatrick

Re: Kirkpatrick

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:23:46 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

korg

Re: korg

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:28:10 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

korg as tuning fork

Re: korg as tuning fork

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:42:54 -0500

55 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 17:04:29 -0800

70 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:34:09 -0500

30 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:13:40 -0500

27 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:36:45 -0500

31 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:44:58 -0500

37 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 21:57:24 -0500

47 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 23:59:45 -0500

31 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:07:26 -0500

22 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 08:44:53 -0500

75 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 12:42:12 -0500

31 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

McKenna <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:37:52 -0500

22 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:29:10 -0500

31 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:30:11 -0500

45 lines

Re: korg as tuning fork

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 08:45:11 -0800

71 lines

New Thread

Korg placebo and a Froberger question

Korg placebo and a Froberger question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:50:15 -0500

36 lines

Re: Korg placebo and a Froberger question

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:02:57 -0800

22 lines

Re: Korg placebo and a Froberger question

John Erskine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:17:21 +0000

27 lines

Re: Korg placebo and a Froberger question

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 20:06:53 -0600

26 lines

Re: Korg placebo and a Froberger question

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 07:07:04 +0100

62 lines

Re: Korg placebo and a Froberger question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 01:37:41 -0800

19 lines

Re: Korg placebo and a Froberger question

Andrew Gibbs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 11:34:53 +0000

33 lines

New Thread

Korg vs. Violab

Korg vs. Violab

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 10:40:32 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Korgies:-)

Korgies:-)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:29:02 +0000

20 lines

Re: Korgies:-)

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:53:58 +0100

38 lines

Re: Korgies:-)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 15:10:07 +0000

23 lines

Re: Korgies:-)

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 10:42:33 -0800

38 lines

Re: Korgies:-)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:58:28 -0500

29 lines

Re: Korgies:-)

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:26:16 -0800

25 lines

Re: Korgies:-)

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 11:53:37 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

koster book/article

koster book/article

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:28:11 +0100

26 lines

Re: koster book/article

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 09:54:19 +0100

37 lines

Re: koster book/article

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:07:43 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

La Bell Homicide

Re: La Bell Homicide

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:58:04 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

La Belle Homicide

La Belle Homicide

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 15:23:46 -0500

33 lines

Re: La Belle Homicide

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:39:53 +0100

53 lines

Re: La Belle Homicide

Turpin D'Isigny-Ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:40:59 +0100

23 lines

Re: La Belle Homicide

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:00:43 +0100

33 lines

Re: La Belle Homicide

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 08:28:59 -0500

88 lines

Re: La Belle Homicide

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 19:36:22 -0600

21 lines

Re: La Belle Homicide

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 19:38:05 -0500

25 lines

Re: La Belle Homicide

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 03:47:17 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

last words?

last words?

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:09:32 +0100

27 lines

Re: last words?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 00:26:55 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Latin plea

Latin plea

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 19:42:18 +0100

22 lines

Re: Latin plea

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 18:23:55 -0500

56 lines

Re: Latin Plea

Jacob Lessing <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 17:31:02 -0600

24 lines

Latin plea

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:50:40 +0100

32 lines

Re: Latin plea

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 12:17:42 -0000

37 lines

New Thread

Latin-American clavichords

Latin-American clavichords

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 09:47:17 -0000

44 lines

Re: Latin-American clavichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 14:48:47 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's tempera ment – E- major = worst key?

Re: Lehman's Bach's tempera ment – E- major = worst key?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:24:54 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's tempera ment – E-major = worst key?

Re: Lehman's Bach's tempera ment – E-major = worst key?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:23:33 +0100

44 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's tempera ment – E-major = worst key?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:00:59 +0100

115 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament

Lehman's Bach's temperament

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 22:45:18 +0100

70 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 00:27:23 +0100

74 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 09:20:32 +0100

33 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:18:00 +0100

102 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 21:02:27 +0100

61 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 15:51:00 -0500

146 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 22:25:14 +0100

29 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 10:57:57 -0500

159 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 11:22:18 -0500

19 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:00:37 -0500

45 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 13:29:44 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection?

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 09:24:56 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 18:11:37 +0100

37 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Paleological issues

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 23:28:32 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection?

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 16:27:31 +0100

48 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:23:07 +0100

20 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament – Werckmeister's pizza-connection?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 21:36:00 +0100

119 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament (Ibo's message unencrypted)

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament (Ibo's message unencrypted)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 23:29:55 -0500

130 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament -

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament -

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:32:13 +0100

17 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament -

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:13:33 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament - (not really Bach, but once again) 55-ET

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament - (not really Bach, but once again) 55-ET

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Jan 2009 17:44:29 +0100

107 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:43:37 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:16:23 +0100

24 lines

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved speculation of the, WTC-squiggles

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 08:48:03 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Lehman's Bach's temperament - Loop holes

Re: Lehman's Bach's temperament - Loop holes

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 22:48:34 +0100

238 lines

New Thread

Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:01:28 +0100

28 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 07:27:04 -0600

40 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 14:49:35 +0100

35 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 08:17:13 -0600

29 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:30:37 +0100

19 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 15:35:41 +0100

20 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:55:20 -0500

21 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 09:59:46 -0500

81 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 10:25:36 -0500

30 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:52:43 +0100

20 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 16:50:53 +0100

17 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 17:01:02 +0100

18 lines

Re: Leonhardt Jubilee edition

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Jan 2009 22:10:49 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Les Barricades Misterieuses

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Peter Clayton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 04:55:10 EST

34 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Peter Clayton <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 05:33:56 EST

24 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Lesley de Voil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 07:42:21 +1000

43 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:02:25 -0800

32 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Diez Eichler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:54:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 12:29:17 -0600

13 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:27:15 -0500

20 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 14:56:19 -0500

18 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 15:02:35 -0500

24 lines

Re: Les Barricades Misterieuses

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Jan 2009 16:40:06 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Les grâces in concert this Saturday: Berkeley, CA

Les grâces in concert this Saturday: Berkeley, CA

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 12:01:04 -0800

31 lines

Re: Les grâces in concert this Saturday: Berkeley, CA

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 14:19:25 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

List matters

List matters

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 08:40:59 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

loops

loops

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 04:38:07 -0800

18 lines

Re: loops

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 20:52:01 -0000

34 lines

Re: loops

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:20:13 -0800

27 lines

Loops

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 09:20:44 -0500

44 lines

Re: Loops

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 15:57:13 -0500

25 lines

Re: Loops

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:12:37 -0500

58 lines

Re: Loops

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 19:58:46 -0500

22 lines

Re: Loops

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 21:25:43 +1100

35 lines

Re: Loops

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 14:10:02 -0500

46 lines

Re: loops

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Jan 2009 12:34:58 -0800

35 lines

Re: Loops

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 16:38:05 +0100

18 lines

Re: Loops

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:40:26 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Loops ---glue

Re: Loops ---glue

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 15:31:52 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Loops part 2

Loops part 2

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 10:23:46 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Loops--OT****

Re: Loops--OT****

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 17:14:56 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

loops: addendum

Re: loops: addendum

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 19:23:01 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Lutz Bungart

Lutz Bungart

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 16:10:16 -0800

28 lines

Re: Lutz Bungart

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Jan 2009 22:38:31 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Mac, Windoze, Linux, music

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:59:14 -0500

41 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:25:59 -0500

28 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:26:57 +0100

38 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:10:14 +0100

28 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:23:53 -0500

28 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:38:35 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:29:44 -0500

39 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:54:09 -0700

52 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 15:00:53 -0700

16 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:57:30 -0500

24 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:19:14 -0500

24 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:44:43 -0500

29 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:41:14 -0700

39 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 06:19:39 +0100

51 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 10:05:07 +0100

18 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music (was: Phishing)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 08:35:34 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:28:30 -0700

15 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 18:31:08 -0700

14 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:11:02 -0500

21 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 22:27:11 -0500

29 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 20:13:38 -0800

36 lines

Re: Mac, Windoze, Linux, music--beat to death?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Jan 2009 23:21:59 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 00:18:38 -0800

71 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:25:38 -0700

35 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 11:10:45 -0500

38 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 09:36:59 -0700

15 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:28:11 -0800

28 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:48:57 -0800

18 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 08:54:51 -0800

26 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:54:21 -0700

33 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

leon aguilera radford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 10:06:30 -0800

52 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 14:27:11 -0500

22 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 21:20:46 +0100

17 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 17:09:12 -0500

32 lines

Re: Math/Science geeks vs musicians

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 20:32:01 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Michele Benuzzi Sydney recital

Michele Benuzzi Sydney recital

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 17:40:44 +1100

41 lines

New Thread

Mnemonics (was: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved ...)

Mnemonics (was: Lehman's Bach's temperament - An improved ...)

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 23:06:00 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

More French Butchery!

More French Butchery!

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 10:08:03 -0800

21 lines

Re: More French Butchery!

Turpin D'Isigny-Ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Jan 2009 20:02:50 +0100

22 lines

Re: More French Butchery!

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 12:54:42 +0100

24 lines

Re: More French Butchery!

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 13:29:31 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

More on non-legato

More on non-legato

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 19:44:14 -0000

161 lines

Re: More on non-legato

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:54:57 -0500

68 lines

Re: More on non-legato

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 00:45:05 -0000

100 lines

Re: More on non-legato

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 22:13:43 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

more super glue

more super glue

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 10:12:00 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Motto for a new harpsichord

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 12:45:25 -0000

61 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:06:11 +0100

17 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:41:49 -0000

21 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

John Erskine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:51:40 +0000

21 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:59:36 +0000

24 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Domenico Statuto - statuto.it <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:04:36 +0100

86 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:10:27 +0100

18 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:22:13 +0100

17 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:03:31 -0800

42 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:05:14 -0600

28 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:26:07 -0500

46 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 11:46:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:19:03 -0700

19 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 17:05:51 +0000

13 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 13:23:05 -0500

25 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:31:48 -0500

18 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 14:36:27 -0500

29 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 16:19:14 -0500

43 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

George Haeh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 18:42:08 -0500

17 lines

Re: Motto for a new harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 22:11:14 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Musical Instruments: History, Technology, and Performance of Instruments of Western Music" (Oxford UP)

Musical Instruments: History, Technology, and Performance of Instruments of Western Music" (Oxford UP)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 05:58:27 -0500

55 lines

Re: Musical Instruments: History, Technology, and Performance of Instruments of Western Music" (Oxford UP)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 08:37:08 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

nails through bridge

nails through bridge

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 21:13:30 -0800

36 lines

Re: nails through bridge

D M <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:33:35 -0600

47 lines

New Thread

Neupert Harpischord to give away

Neupert Harpischord to give away

Ian VanderBurgh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 08:03:48 -0500

15 lines

Re: Neupert Harpischord to give away

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 17:15:36 -0500

37 lines

Re: Neupert Harpischord to give away

mbusija <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 19:12:16 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 22:09:03 -0500

18 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 07:35:39 -0600

78 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:52:21 -0000

107 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 15:12:48 +0100

29 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:03:15 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 13:44:02 -0000

42 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 11:00:31 -0500

21 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen

Aapo Häkkinen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:29:47 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen-Rameau's non-legato

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen-Rameau's non-legato

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 16:53:25 -0000

68 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen-Rameau's non-legato

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:08:38 +0100

42 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen-Rameau's non-legato

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 17:20:32 -0000

94 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen-Rameau's non-legato

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 18:43:32 +0100

45 lines

Re: New CDs on Historic Harpsichords-Asperen-Rameau's non-legato

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:36:57 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Nice recording on virginal & harpsichord

Nice recording on virginal & harpsichord

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:14:24 +0100

27 lines

Re: Nice recording on virginal & harpsichord

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 14:45:24 -0500

30 lines

Nice recording on virginal & harpsichord

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 22:25:01 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

no content - please ignore

no content - please ignore

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 14:11:25 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

Numerology in Bach, was Bach tempi?

Re: Numerology in Bach, was Bach tempi?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 10:47:08 -0000

55 lines

Re: Numerology in Bach, was Bach tempi?

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 20:34:17 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

O.T. New Gamba Piece by Vox Member

O.T. New Gamba Piece by Vox Member

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 14:28:24 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

Occam's razor

Occam's razor

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 15:10:25 -0500

69 lines

New Thread

Offlist reply - Re: Driven to Digest x 2

Offlist reply - Re: Driven to Digest x 2

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 13:18:19 -0800

19 lines

Re: Offlist reply - Re: Driven to Digest x 2

Your Full Name <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 16:37:38 EST

30 lines

Re: Offlist reply - Re: Driven to Digest x 2

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:45:32 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

old essay, for what it's worth

old essay, for what it's worth

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 19:19:48 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

On Harpsichord Tone Quality - Not a Harpsichord At All

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality - Not a Harpsichord At All

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:51:10 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 14:56:22 -0500

23 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:48:37 +0100

18 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:18:20 -0600

13 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:21:52 +0100

22 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

dragons <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:23:39 +0000

35 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:30:46 -0500

19 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:02:15 -0800

31 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

JOHN BRODSKY <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:03:13 -0800

22 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 15:12:43 -0800

24 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:41:25 -0500

56 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

ng <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 20:55:35 -0600

45 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:11:05 -0500

27 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 07:14:20 +0100

31 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Douglas?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 03:36:13 -0500

39 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:12:48 -0500

42 lines

Re: On Harpsichord Tone Quality and Identification

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 09:50:30 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

One-stop temperament superstore?

One-stop temperament superstore?

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 12:06:08 -0800

39 lines

Re: One-stop temperament superstore?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Jan 2009 23:14:22 +0100

25 lines

Re: One-stop temperament superstore?

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Jan 2009 14:19:41 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

order of tuning stops (was overthinking inharmonicity)

order of tuning stops (was overthinking inharmonicity)

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 14:03:50 -0800

68 lines

Re: order of tuning stops (was overthinking inharmonicity)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 19:38:56 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

OT calligram

OT calligram

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Jan 2009 00:13:54 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

OT list misuse

OT list misuse

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 15:26:32 +0100

13 lines

Re: OT list misuse

Patrick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:06:42 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Our numbers

Our numbers

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Jan 2009 13:20:56 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Overdamping experiment

Overdamping experiment

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 13:17:26 -0000

33 lines

New Thread

overthinking inharmonicity

overthinking inharmonicity

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Jan 2009 10:57:06 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Owen's rant

Owen's rant

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 06:38:21 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

parallel perfect consonances,

Re: parallel perfect consonances,

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 09:58:49 -0600

81 lines

New Thread

parallel perfect consonances, was Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann 2

parallel perfect consonances, was Re: Asperen, Before-the-beat, Neumann 2

D.C.Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:01:32 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Philosophy

Philosophy

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:31:25 -0600

27 lines

Re: Philosophy

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Jan 2009 17:37:42 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Phishing

Phishing

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 15:50:05 -0500

20 lines

Re: Phishing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Jan 2009 23:43:01 -0500

27 lines

Re: Phishing

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:34:01 +0100

27 lines

Re: Phishing

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:01:31 +0000

38 lines

Re: Phishing

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 07:57:06 -0800

35 lines

Re: Phishing

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:51:05 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Phishing (OT from the start)

Re: Phishing (OT from the start)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 16:08:20 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

Phishing Mac vs PC OT

Re: Phishing Mac vs PC OT

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:29:52 -0700

61 lines

Re: Phishing Mac vs PC OT

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:13:15 +0100

25 lines

Re: Phishing Mac vs PC OT

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 20:13:48 +0100

65 lines

Re: Phishing Mac vs PC OT

BEDersch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 11:43:42 -0800

78 lines

Re: Phishing Mac vs PC OT

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:12:53 -0500

24 lines

Re: Phishing Mac vs PC OT

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 18:51:14 -0500

26 lines

Re: Phishing Mac vs PC OT

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 19:07:59 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Playing.... getting worse.

Playing.... getting worse.

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:50:51 -0500

26 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 23:05:11 -0500

39 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Jan 2009 22:19:58 -0800

33 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

D M <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 00:49:39 -0600

60 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 16:21:27 +0100

23 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Tom Roach <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:35:22 -0500

64 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 09:46:30 -0600

15 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 10:33:05 -0700

26 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:15:05 -0500

29 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 12:29:48 -0500

14 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Sandy Hackney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 14:45:50 -0500

51 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 22:59:19 -0500

26 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:38:05 +1100

25 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse.

Lesley de Voil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 21:20:33 +1000

32 lines

New Thread

Playing.... getting worse. - other child wonders

Re: Playing.... getting worse. - other child wonders

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 01:16:31 -0500

29 lines

Re: Playing.... getting worse. - other child wonders

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 17:54:09 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Playing.... getting worse. - Then Multi-track

Re: Playing.... getting worse. - Then Multi-track

Kenneth Elhardt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Jan 2009 21:04:30 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

plectrum angle

plectrum angle

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 21:56:35 +0100

12 lines

Re: plectrum angle

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Jan 2009 17:04:09 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Posting requirements

Posting requirements

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:35:01 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Postings

Postings

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 13:37:18 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

pre-owned hpschd in NW

pre-owned hpschd in NW

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:07:50 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

preposterously huge clavichords

preposterously huge clavichords

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 10:18:52 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

pushing the Werckmeister envelope

pushing the Werckmeister envelope

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Jan 2009 09:23:52 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

question about a silly but cosmic temperament

question about a silly but cosmic temperament

julio galvao <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:00:48 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

question for my colleagues

question for my colleagues

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 13:19:46 -0500

24 lines

Re: question for my colleagues

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 22:14:49 +0100

66 lines

Re: question for my colleagues

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Jan 2009 18:05:21 -0500

96 lines

Re: question for my colleagues

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 01:20:52 +0100

43 lines

Re: question for my colleagues

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 10:14:00 +0100

34 lines

Re: question for my colleagues

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 11:28:32 +0100

33 lines

Re: question for my colleagues

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Jan 2009 13:53:23 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 13:24:41 -0500

80 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:16:00 +0100

36 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 20:48:00 +0100

23 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 15:27:53 -0500

27 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:39:46 +0100

20 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

George Haeh <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Jan 2009 21:35:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 07:36:26 +0100

26 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:16:09 +0000

42 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 14:27:27 +0000

34 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 13:43:30 -0500

84 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 20:31:33 +0100

29 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 15:00:37 -0500

61 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

James R. McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 09:24:33 -0600

26 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 10:45:31 -0500

30 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Jan 2009 11:01:23 -0500

31 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Jan 2009 18:08:48 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Rameau's non-legato, and so on-CAREFUL PLEASE!!

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on-CAREFUL PLEASE!!

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 11:13:51 -0000

59 lines

Re: Rameau's non-legato, and so on-CAREFUL PLEASE!!

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Jan 2009 16:46:28 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Re. could someone explain

Re. could someone explain

Turpin D'Isigny-Ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:36:33 +0100

23 lines

Re: Re. could someone explain

tschulian <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 21:50:32 +0100

18 lines

Re: Re. could someone explain

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:09:29 -0500

20 lines

Re: Re. could someone explain

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Jan 2009 22:30:29 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

re. trivium

re. trivium

julian <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:40:43 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Reflections on the Dulce Melos

Reflections on the Dulce Melos

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 06:12:39 -0800

59 lines

Re: Reflections on the Dulce Melos

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Jan 2009 14:31:51 -0000

22 lines

New Thread

RESOLVED - Motto for a new harpsichord

RESOLVED - Motto for a new harpsichord

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Jan 2009 19:59:27 -0000

57 lines

RESOLVED - Motto for a new harpsichord

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:13:49 -0000

64 lines

New Thread

Response to: Administrative -- all read

Response to: Administrative -- all read

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:49:29 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

routing was carving

routing was carving

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:01:50 +0100

25 lines

Re: routing was carving

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 17:25:14 +0100

48 lines

Re: routing was carving

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 13:32:06 -0500

43 lines

Re: routing was carving

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 14:05:02 -0500

37 lines

Re: routing was carving

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:33:43 +0100

20 lines

Re: routing was carving

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 20:59:10 +0100

42 lines

Re: routing was carving

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:15:46 +0100

20 lines

Re: routing was carving

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Jan 2009 21:42:35 +0100

18 lines

Re: routing was carving

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:42:01 -0500

32 lines

Re: routing was carving

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:46:40 -0500

47 lines

Re: routing was carving

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 00:55:52 -0500

33 lines

Re: routing was carving

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:43:52 +0100

34 lines

Re: routing was carving

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:55:24 +0100

34 lines

Re: routing was carving

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 08:30:43 +0000

29 lines

Re: routing was carving

ffytche <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Jan 2009 09:37:36 +0100

16 lines

Re: routing was carving

Rodney Myrvaagnes <