LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2008


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Killer" (1 message)
(Wire gages and) old measurement units (1 message)
1774 Brussels Taskin (2 messages)
1774 Taskin in Brussels (2 messages)
1965 Yardbirds Video (1 message)
2008 ZHI Workshop (4 messages)
a propos Wilhelm Busch, was Stuttgart (1 message)
Address for Guy Oldham? (1 message)
Advice sought (1 message)
bass bridge (3 messages)
Bass-bridges (5 messages)
Bass-bridges, now Stuttgart (4 messages)
Beecham's harpsichord views (3 messages)
Beryllium copper wire (8 messages)
Black History and Harpsichords (8 messages)
boners (3 messages)
Burnishing jacks (2 messages)
Burnishing jacks, trailing off... (1 message)
burnishing jacks? (3 messages)
Byrd hexachord, source comparisons (2 messages)
cd's (4 messages)
Colmar Ruckers recordings (was: RK Lee drawings) (1 message)
Contact info for Dr. Peter Williams? (1 message)
Correction (1 message)
Dance and music (4 messages)
dodgy plans - was stuning stability + LYON (1 message)
Dolmetsch jacks (2 messages)
Don't burn your old Peters sheet music (4 messages)
Douwes's string lists (2 messages)
Even more offlist *** (1 message)
F.X. Richter (1 message)
Flemish III interests? (1 message)
for sale (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Tuning stability (10 messages)
Gag gift on e-bay! (4 messages)
Good Drawings of Bad Instruments (1 message)
Harp-is-chord (4 messages)
harp-is-chords (1 message)
Harp-is-chords and other boners (16 messages)
Harp-is-chords, now things on the wall (1 message)
Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme (15 messages)
How others hear us (11 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 1 Feb 2008 to 2 Feb 2008 (#2008-34) (1 message)
Instruments Old and New (1 message)
Keyboard surgery (butchery?) (1 message)
Killer (11 messages)
Landowska's personality (2 messages)
Landowska's personality **** (5 messages)
LAST of the SLABSIDES (7 messages)
Looks like antique (2 messages)
Monteverdi Vespers (1 message)
More on Drawings (1 message)
name batten fasteners (10 messages)
New Ensemble Competition at Fenton House (1 message)
not really OT (1 message)
Obit Buckley (9 messages)
Obit Buckley - on topic too! (1 message)
OFFLIST (1 message)
OFFLIST ***** (6 messages)
OT Re: Status of Harpsichords and the like (1 message)
OT: Music stand (1 message)
other boners ****** (1 message)
Over balanced harpsichords (3 messages)
perticis (1 message)
Really OT ******** (2 messages)
recordings (11 messages)
recordings (private) (2 messages)
RK Lee drawings (5 messages)
Rounded plectra? (6 messages)
Rounded plectra? corr. (1 message)
screws (1 message)
screws Aus (1 message)
screws USA (1 message)
screws, was name batten fasteners (1 message)
SF Bay Area harpsichord for sale (1 message)
Smith (5 messages)
Some may appreciate (6 messages)
Some Might Appreciate... (1 message)
Spanyi recital (2 messages)
Status of Harpsichords and the like (3 messages)
sticky tongues (5 messages)
Thanks all! (1 message)
the force of personality... (2 messages)
Tuning stability (6 messages)
Tuning stability, correction (1 message)
Upright tangentenfluegel? (2 messages)
Vater (1 message)
walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle (7 messages)
Webcast of Monteverdi Vespers (1 message)
What we hear (1 message)
William F. Buckley Jr. (1 message)
William Smith / Wire Gages (1 message)
Wire gages and old measurement units (2 messages)
Wire Gauges (6 messages)
Yale dins (5 messages)
[07/02/2008] - Entretien video avec Bruno Procopio (1) (2 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Killer"

"Killer"

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:37:09 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

(Wire gages and) old measurement units

Re: (Wire gages and) old measurement units

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:48:50 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

1774 Brussels Taskin

1774 Brussels Taskin

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 22:26:38 -0500

13 lines

Re: 1774 Brussels Taskin

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 06:27:36 -0800

14 lines

New Thread

1774 Taskin in Brussels

1774 Taskin in Brussels

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:56:35 -0500

20 lines

Re: 1774 Taskin in Brussels

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 12:16:11 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

1965 Yardbirds Video

1965 Yardbirds Video

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 13:00:36 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

2008 ZHI Workshop

2008 ZHI Workshop

Edward L Kottick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:31:26 -0600

41 lines

Re: 2008 ZHI Workshop

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:13:53 -0600

53 lines

Re: 2008 ZHI Workshop

Edward L Kottick <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:45:46 -0600

59 lines

Re: 2008 ZHI Workshop

Kate Swytak <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 03:21:28 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

a propos Wilhelm Busch, was Stuttgart

a propos Wilhelm Busch, was Stuttgart

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:20:01 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Address for Guy Oldham?

Address for Guy Oldham?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:42:13 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Advice sought

Advice sought

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 07:54:37 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

bass bridge

bass bridge

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 10:18:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: bass bridge

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 11:02:54 -0500

34 lines

Re: bass bridge

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 19:56:03 +0100

42 lines

New Thread

Bass-bridges

Bass-bridges

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 14:16:42 -0500

19 lines

Re: Bass-bridges

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2008 16:26:32 -0500

24 lines

Re: Bass-bridges

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 10:11:04 +0100

80 lines

Re: Bass-bridges

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 23:55:04 -0500

28 lines

Re: Bass-bridges

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:41:51 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Bass-bridges, now Stuttgart

Re: Bass-bridges, now Stuttgart

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2008 15:59:06 -0500

15 lines

Re: Bass-bridges, now Stuttgart

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 13:10:51 +0100

42 lines

Re: Bass-bridges, now Stuttgart

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 07:28:27 -0500

20 lines

Re: Bass-bridges, now Stuttgart

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:18:29 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Beecham's harpsichord views

Beecham's harpsichord views

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 16:24:35 -0500

22 lines

Re: Beecham's harpsichord views

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 18:32:53 -0500

25 lines

Re: Beecham's harpsichord views

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 22:41:17 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Beryllium copper wire

Beryllium copper wire

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:28:42 -0500

25 lines

Re: Beryllium copper wire

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 12:51:01 -0500

52 lines

Re: Beryllium copper wire

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:32:34 -0500

27 lines

Re: Beryllium copper wire

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 23:37:10 -0500

24 lines

Re: Beryllium copper wire

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 07:27:13 -0800

24 lines

Re: Beryllium copper wire

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 14:34:05 -0500

36 lines

Re: Beryllium copper wire

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 11:02:30 -0800

26 lines

Re: Beryllium copper wire

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:20:21 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Black History and Harpsichords

Black History and Harpsichords

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 13:51:19 -0500

36 lines

Re: Black History and Harpsichords

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 20:23:23 +0100

47 lines

Re: Black History and Harpsichords

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 14:32:18 -0500

27 lines

Re: Black History and Harpsichords

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:01:39 EST

28 lines

Re: Black History and Harpsichords

Nicholas Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:10:40 -0500

23 lines

Re: Black History and Harpsichords

BEDersch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 12:13:47 -0800

24 lines

Re: Black History and Harpsichords

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 15:22:44 -0500

16 lines

Re: Black History and Harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 01:32:26 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

boners

boners

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 08:43:45 -0600

25 lines

Re: boners

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 10:32:55 -0500

23 lines

Re: boners

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:26:41 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Burnishing jacks

Burnishing jacks

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:18:43 -0800

39 lines

Re: Burnishing jacks

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:22:28 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Burnishing jacks, trailing off...

Re: Burnishing jacks, trailing off...

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:56:13 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

burnishing jacks?

burnishing jacks?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 19:31:57 +1100

16 lines

Re: burnishing jacks?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:30:46 -0500

21 lines

Re: burnishing jacks?

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 16:47:46 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Byrd hexachord, source comparisons

Byrd hexachord, source comparisons

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 19:44:54 +0100

103 lines

Re: Byrd hexachord, source comparisons

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 14:36:12 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

cd's

cd's

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:43:30 +0100

28 lines

Re: cd's

Mark Howard <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 06:33:59 -0800

33 lines

Re: cd's

Charlotte Mattax <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:14:00 -0600

47 lines

Re: cd's

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 18:22:05 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Colmar Ruckers recordings (was: RK Lee drawings)

Re: Colmar Ruckers recordings (was: RK Lee drawings)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 21:00:01 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

Contact info for Dr. Peter Williams?

Contact info for Dr. Peter Williams?

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 15:09:49 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

Correction

Correction

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 10:57:58 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Dance and music

Re: Dance and music

Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 23:00:24 -0800

39 lines

Re: Dance and music

Penny Draper <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 10:17:06 -0500

74 lines

Re: Dance and music

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:19:10 +0100

26 lines

Re: Dance and music

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 00:40:17 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

dodgy plans - was stuning stability + LYON

dodgy plans - was stuning stability + LYON

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 23:12:38 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Dolmetsch jacks

Dolmetsch jacks

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:56:03 EST

24 lines

Re: Dolmetsch jacks

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:12:32 -0800

13 lines

New Thread

Don't burn your old Peters sheet music

Re: Don't burn your old Peters sheet music

Aapo Hakkinen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:42:29 -0500

16 lines

Re: Don't burn your old Peters sheet music

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 11:02:01 -0500

76 lines

Re: Don't burn your old Peters sheet music

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:19:44 -0600

100 lines

Re: Don't burn your old Peters sheet music

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 03:17:25 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Douwes's string lists

Douwes's string lists

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:30:21 -0500

18 lines

Re: Douwes's string lists

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 07:40:54 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Even more offlist ***

Even more offlist ***

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:33:56 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

F.X. Richter

F.X. Richter

Aapo Häkkinen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:48:53 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

Flemish III interests?

Flemish III interests?

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 14:34:51 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

for sale

for sale

Aapo Häkkinen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 18:07:53 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2008 17:13:10 +0100

123 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2008 21:22:56 -0500

21 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:28:22 +1100

29 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 08:21:11 +0100

63 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

=?windows-1252?Q?PJ?= <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 10:12:56 -0500

37 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:52:11 -0500

26 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 00:56:33 -0500

26 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:48:56 -0500

25 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 04:30:43 -0500

26 lines

Re: Fwd: Re: Tuning stability

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 16:11:35 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Gag gift on e-bay!

Gag gift on e-bay!

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:10:29 -0500

22 lines

Re: Gag gift on e-bay!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:45:28 -0600

40 lines

Re: Gag gift on e-bay!

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:02:32 +0000

18 lines

Re: Gag gift on e-bay!

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:12:33 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Good Drawings of Bad Instruments

Good Drawings of Bad Instruments

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:56:30 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Harp-is-chord

Harp-is-chord

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 11:57:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Harp-is-chord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:44:49 -0500

22 lines

Re: Harp-is-chord

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:16:51 -0600

42 lines

Re: Harp-is-chord

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:32:20 -0000

15 lines

New Thread

harp-is-chords

Re: harp-is-chords

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 02:41:10 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

Harp-is-chords and other boners

Harp-is-chords and other boners

Helen Cripe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 16:40:13 -0500

23 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:24:00 -0500

43 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 17:40:15 -0500

24 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:26:55 -0500

27 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 01:10:09 -0500

50 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:25:24 +0000

31 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 09:35:16 +0100

56 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 12:20:53 +0100

26 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:03:29 -0600

37 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 06:41:30 -0600

46 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 17:56:28 -0500

39 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 13:08:12 -0600

16 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 20:18:29 -0600

40 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:04:03 -0500

45 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 22:08:07 EST

18 lines

Re: Harp-is-chords and other boners

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 13:49:38 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

Harp-is-chords, now things on the wall

Re: Harp-is-chords, now things on the wall

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 08:49:08 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 13:15:45 +0100

30 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:53:16 -0800

16 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:14:42 +0100

27 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:15:53 -0500

23 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:52:05 +0100

26 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:36:15 -0600

39 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:10:46 -0500

60 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 22:38:26 +0100

20 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:57:56 -0500

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 18:15:50 -0600

42 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:44:16 -0500

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:12:14 -0600

46 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 10:28:43 -0500

34 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Martin Usher <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:39:27 -0800

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord version of the Mission: Impossible theme

Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 13:29:37 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

How others hear us

How others hear us

Ted Otto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 14:19:13 -0800

39 lines

How others hear us

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:00:01 +0100

18 lines

Re: How others hear us

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 06:12:07 -0600

58 lines

Re: How others hear us

Martin Usher <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 09:07:00 -0800

49 lines

Re: How others hear us

Your Full Name <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:03:25 EST

63 lines

Re: How others hear us

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 15:15:26 -0500

39 lines

Re: How others hear us

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 14:27:51 -0600

16 lines

Re: How others hear us

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 20:25:47 -0500

18 lines

Re: How others hear us

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:39:26 -0500

38 lines

Re: How others hear us

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:13:28 +0100

25 lines

Re: How others hear us

Your Full Name <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:48:47 EST

92 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 1 Feb 2008 to 2 Feb 2008 (#2008-34)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 1 Feb 2008 to 2 Feb 2008 (#2008-34)

Sandra Mangsen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 09:14:07 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Instruments Old and New

Instruments Old and New

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:21:45 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

Keyboard surgery (butchery?)

Keyboard surgery (butchery?)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:44:12 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Killer

Killer

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 23:30:44 -0500

46 lines

Re: Killer

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:17:48 -0500

26 lines

Re: Killer

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 00:41:51 -0500

44 lines

Re: Killer

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 07:37:45 +0100

22 lines

Re: Killer

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 12:56:02 +0100

18 lines

Re: Killer

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 06:26:22 -0600

40 lines

Re: Killer

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 08:09:25 -0500

68 lines

Re: Killer

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:34:21 -0500

38 lines

Re: Killer

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:11:12 -0500

26 lines

Re: Killer

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 02:38:25 -0800

28 lines

Re: Killer

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 06:59:23 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

Landowska's personality

Landowska's personality

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 10:49:07 -0500

23 lines

Re: Landowska's personality

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 17:08:33 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Landowska's personality ****

Re: Landowska's personality ****

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 14:15:03 -0500

20 lines

Re: Landowska's personality ****

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 20:03:21 +0000

26 lines

Re: Landowska's personality ****

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 19:56:16 -0500

31 lines

Re: Landowska's personality ****

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 08:12:03 +0000

36 lines

Re: Landowska's personality ****

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 14:27:48 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

LAST of the SLABSIDES

LAST of the SLABSIDES

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 16:32:24 -0800

21 lines

Re: LAST of the SLABSIDES

Edward L Kottick <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 21:46:26 -0600

27 lines

Re: LAST of the SLABSIDES

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 22:12:59 +1000

19 lines

Re: LAST of the SLABSIDES

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 18:32:41 +1100

91 lines

Re: LAST of the SLABSIDES

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 10:29:11 -0500

26 lines

Re: LAST of the SLABSIDES

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:40:41 -0600

73 lines

Re: LAST of the SLABSIDES

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 13:06:31 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Looks like antique

Looks like antique

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 07:56:56 -0800

21 lines

Re: Looks like antique

Jean-Pierre Baconnet <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 16:36:28 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Monteverdi Vespers

Monteverdi Vespers

Karen Flint <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 00:23:55 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

More on Drawings

More on Drawings

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 14:42:08 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

name batten fasteners

name batten fasteners

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:08:40 -0500

22 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:00:06 +0100

20 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 06:02:31 -0800

16 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:26:11 -0500

34 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:58:01 -0500

53 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:17:04 +0100

21 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 18:34:05 +0100

50 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:46:26 -0800

18 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:49:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: name batten fasteners

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:06:52 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

New Ensemble Competition at Fenton House

New Ensemble Competition at Fenton House

Mimi S. Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 13:08:01 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

not really OT

not really OT

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 14:05:39 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Obit Buckley

Obit Buckley

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 18:49:03 -0500

13 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 19:46:21 -0500

23 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 20:10:24 -0800

25 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

Martha Bishop <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:23:47 -0500

25 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 11:25:38 -0500

34 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:58:15 -0500

27 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:56:16 +0100

34 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 09:53:04 -0500

16 lines

Re: Obit Buckley

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:20:04 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Obit Buckley - on topic too!

Re: Obit Buckley - on topic too!

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 23:09:47 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

OFFLIST

OFFLIST

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2008 21:27:08 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

OFFLIST *****

Re: OFFLIST *****

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 07:43:32 -0500

38 lines

Re: OFFLIST *****

Stanley E. Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 05:46:50 -0800

47 lines

Re: OFFLIST *****

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 07:51:48 -0600

24 lines

Re: OFFLIST *****

Stanley E. Guy <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 05:55:50 -0800

29 lines

Re: OFFLIST *****

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 10:03:57 -0500

37 lines

Re: OFFLIST *****

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:42:39 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

OT Re: Status of Harpsichords and the like

OT Re: Status of Harpsichords and the like

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 12:52:55 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

OT: Music stand

OT: Music stand

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2008 15:55:00 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

other boners ******

other boners ******

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:56:50 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Over balanced harpsichords

Over balanced harpsichords

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 20:18:22 -0600

20 lines

Re: Over balanced harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 23:08:17 -0500

32 lines

Re: Over balanced harpsichords

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 05:10:33 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

perticis

perticis

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:47:59 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Really OT ********

Really OT ********

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 10:45:51 -0500

45 lines

Re: Really OT ********

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:40:35 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

recordings

recordings

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:35:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: recordings

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:46:52 +1100

33 lines

Re: recordings

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 06:14:10 +0100

29 lines

Re: recordings

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 08:18:01 -0500

43 lines

Re: recordings

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 10:22:49 -0500

16 lines

Re: recordings

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 19:03:41 +0100

38 lines

Re: Recordings

Martin Usher <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 10:14:26 -0800

60 lines

Re: Recordings

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2008 14:41:42 -0500

29 lines

Re: Recordings

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:07:45 +0100

21 lines

Re: Recordings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 16:39:24 -0500

32 lines

Re: Recordings

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 09:52:06 -0600

59 lines

New Thread

recordings (private)

Re: recordings (private)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:57:18 -0600

46 lines

Re: recordings (private)

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:15:29 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

RK Lee drawings

RK Lee drawings

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 09:15:17 -0800

31 lines

Re: RK Lee drawings

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:25:29 +0100

18 lines

Re: RK Lee drawings

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 14:56:35 -0600

45 lines

Re: RK Lee drawings

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 11:05:30 +1100

39 lines

Re: RK Lee drawings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 18:16:19 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

Rounded plectra?

Rounded plectra?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 19:38:49 +0100

20 lines

Re: Rounded plectra?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:58:38 +0000

24 lines

Re: Rounded plectra?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:16:11 -0500

48 lines

Re: Rounded plectra?

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 18:36:20 -0500

29 lines

Re: Rounded plectra?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 15:51:45 +0000

22 lines

Re: Rounded plectra?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2008 12:36:05 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Rounded plectra? corr.

Re: Rounded plectra? corr.

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 17:23:48 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

screws

screws

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 07:58:47 +1000

16 lines

New Thread

screws Aus

Re: screws Aus

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 14:09:36 +1000

19 lines

New Thread

screws USA

Re: screws USA

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:04:04 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

screws, was name batten fasteners

Re: screws, was name batten fasteners

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 10:02:51 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

SF Bay Area harpsichord for sale

SF Bay Area harpsichord for sale

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 16:28:47 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

Smith

Smith

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 20:25:57 -0000

26 lines

Re: Smith

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 21:27:56 +1000

33 lines

Re: Smith

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2008 22:03:51 -0000

21 lines

Re: Smith

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 10:02:49 +1100

30 lines

Re: Smith

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 17:56:29 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

Some may appreciate

Re: Some may appreciate

Martin Usher <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 22:55:16 -0800

17 lines

Re: Some may appreciate

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 06:22:25 -0600

34 lines

Re: Some may appreciate

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 08:12:37 -0500

40 lines

Re: Some may appreciate

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 14:47:32 -0500

60 lines

Re: Some may appreciate

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 17:16:23 -0500

31 lines

Re: Some may appreciate

Martin Usher <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 08:32:42 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Some Might Appreciate...

Some Might Appreciate...

Grant Colburn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 21:37:28 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

Spanyi recital

Spanyi recital

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2008 12:34:45 +0100

17 lines

Re: Spanyi recital

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 05:07:09 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

Status of Harpsichords and the like

Status of Harpsichords and the like

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2008 12:03:02 -0800

28 lines

Re: Status of Harpsichords and the like

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 16:41:15 -0800

25 lines

Re: Status of Harpsichords and the like

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:10:11 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

sticky tongues

sticky tongues

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 09:49:54 +0100

18 lines

Re: sticky tongues

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 04:26:40 -0500

42 lines

Re: sticky tongues

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 20:57:06 +1100

36 lines

Re: sticky tongues

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 11:05:09 +0100

32 lines

Re: sticky tongues

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2008 12:42:52 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Thanks all!

Thanks all!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:11:01 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

the force of personality...

the force of personality...

Davitt Moroney <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 12:28:04 -0800

83 lines

Re: the force of personality...

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 21:41:48 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Tuning stability

Tuning stability

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2008 14:26:22 -0500

50 lines

Re: Tuning stability

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 06:21:49 -0600

50 lines

Re: Tuning stability

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 07:45:09 -0600

53 lines

Re: Tuning stability

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 17:00:41 +0100

45 lines

Re: Tuning stability

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:10:16 -0500

50 lines

Re: Tuning stability

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2008 15:45:02 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Tuning stability, correction

Re: Tuning stability, correction

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 13:13:33 -0500

11 lines

New Thread

Upright tangentenfluegel?

Upright tangentenfluegel?

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 11:03:36 -0800

15 lines

Re: Upright tangentenfluegel?

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2008 19:21:13 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Vater

Vater

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2008 10:51:51 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 16:29:12 -0500

18 lines

Re: walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 08:47:43 +1100

33 lines

Re: walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2008 17:51:01 EST

54 lines

Re: walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 15:43:19 -0500

32 lines

Re: walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 20:28:30 -0500

27 lines

Re: walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 05:45:21 +0100

18 lines

Re: walnut block and modern tuning pins hassle

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 29 Feb 2008 15:44:55 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Webcast of Monteverdi Vespers

Re: Webcast of Monteverdi Vespers

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 04:58:04 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

What we hear

What we hear

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2008 07:45:04 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

William F. Buckley Jr.

William F. Buckley Jr.

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2008 09:56:57 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

William Smith / Wire Gages

Re: William Smith / Wire Gages

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 10:30:10 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Wire gages and old measurement units

Wire gages and old measurement units

Martin Usher <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 11:50:51 -0800

30 lines

Re: Wire gages and old measurement units

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 23:57:55 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Wire Gauges

Wire Gauges

ANDREW NOLAN <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 02:47:33 +1000

22 lines

Re: Wire Gauges

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 18:30:12 +0100

15 lines

Re: Wire Gauges

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 19:09:37 +0100

30 lines

Re: Wire Gauges

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 12:38:41 -0600

21 lines

Re: Wire Gauges

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2008 14:23:13 -0500

27 lines

Re: Wire Gauges

Bill Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2008 04:50:13 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Yale dins

Yale dins

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:32:11 +0100

25 lines

Re: Yale dins

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 11:24:14 -0500

22 lines

Re: Yale dins

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2008 16:15:01 -0500

28 lines

Re: Yale dins

Aapo Hakkinen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2008 06:15:12 -0500

19 lines

Re: Yale dins

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2008 04:43:15 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

[07/02/2008] - Entretien video avec Bruno Procopio (1)

[07/02/2008] - Entretien video avec Bruno Procopio (1)

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2008 16:33:26 +1100

38 lines

Re: [07/02/2008] - Entretien video avec Bruno Procopio (1)

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2008 05:31:47 -0500

17 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu