|
|
|
|
Size
|
****Jumping the Shark
|
Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 11:31:37 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: ****Jumping the Shark
|
Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 12:11:56 -0700 |
29 lines |
Re: ****Jumping the Shark
|
Robert C L Watson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 15:23:08 -0400 |
15 lines |
... but some temperaments are more equal than others
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 2 May 2006 18:15:15 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 2 May 2006 12:42:49 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 2 May 2006 23:29:15 +0400 |
31 lines |
Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others
|
Pierre-Henri Jondot <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 13:23:09 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 17:45:03 +0200 |
20 lines |
Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 21:28:06 +0400 |
24 lines |
Re: 08/15, OT. stamping on collective breaks
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 16:56:07 -0400 |
32 lines |
1/2 retraction
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 13:57:31 -0400 |
26 lines |
18th century dancer
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 14:37:46 +0000 |
27 lines |
5 1/2 octaves
|
Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 18:41:34 +1000 |
16 lines |
Re: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
15 lines |
Re: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 09:20:59 +0000 |
50 lines |
5 1/2 octaves
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 23:10:23 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 07:46:04 +0400 |
25 lines |
Re: 5 1/2 octaves
|
J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 11:59:21 +0200 |
44 lines |
A new balance mortice punch for me.
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
22 lines |
A Sassman appears
|
David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 19:27:59 -0700 |
46 lines |
A tale for a sinner
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
20 lines |
Re: A tale for a sinner
|
Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 14:28:32 +1000 |
35 lines |
a tale of Picchi
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 09:12:57 -0400 |
33 lines |
an hour to set up meantone?!
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 2 May 2006 14:30:41 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: an hour to set up meantone?!
|
Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 2 May 2006 16:44:08 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: an hour to set up meantone?!
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 2 May 2006 19:48:53 -0500 |
31 lines |
Re: an hour to set up meantone?!
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 10:56:13 +0200 |
24 lines |
Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 22:33:58 +0000 |
50 lines |
Re: Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 22:25:19 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 02:33:23 +0000 |
17 lines |
Re: Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 07:34:31 +0200 |
67 lines |
Barafostus' Dreame
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 17:25:40 +0000 |
12 lines |
Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 10:57:35 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 19:12:32 +0100 |
15 lines |
Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 19:43:08 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 13:31:38 -0700 |
18 lines |
Baroque music in Bolivia/Zipoli etc.
|
Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 07:22:29 -0400 |
22 lines |
Berkeley Festival update
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 10:23:33 -0700 |
45 lines |
books cost more than harpsichords
|
Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 19:40:47 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: books cost more than harpsichords
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 20:22:43 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: books cost more than harpsichords
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 06:15:02 +0200 |
24 lines |
Re: books cost more than harpsichords
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 08:33:56 +0400 |
37 lines |
Re: books cost more than harpsichords
|
Massimo Nespolo <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 07:53:28 -0400 |
28 lines |
brokeback harpsichord
|
David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 01:54:17 -0700 |
49 lines |
Re: brokeback harpsichord
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 08:43:57 -0400 |
62 lines |
Re: brokeback harpsichord
|
Hinrich <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 09:38:29 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: brokeback harpsichord
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 22:58:07 +0400 |
74 lines |
BWV 552
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 22:30:52 -0400 |
31 lines |
BWV 552
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 17:39:10 +0200 |
18 lines |
BWV 622 and 671, etc
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 17:47:21 -0400 |
68 lines |
Concert review
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 02:05:24 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Concert review
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
20 lines |
Re: Concert review
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 05:41:40 -0500 |
47 lines |
Contact Request
|
Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 14:51:47 -0400 |
16 lines |
Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it.
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 11:29:37 -0700 |
26 lines |
Re: Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it.
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 20:46:51 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it.
|
David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 11 May 2006 09:14:53 -0700 |
13 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific .. yada yada
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 23:29:56 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 08:23:30 +0100 |
31 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 09:36:35 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 18:50:29 +0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 18:49:47 +0200 |
41 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 13:29:38 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 20:37:40 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:37 +0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
29 lines |
Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:19 -0700 |
59 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 13:00:08 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 10:23:58 -0700 |
69 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 19:26:45 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 11:55:06 -0600 |
52 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 16:57:12 -0400 |
194 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 00:48:31 +0200 |
70 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 07:28:53 +0400 |
53 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 23:40:02 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 07:53:55 +0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Criterions [Criteria] for an [a] scientific[ally] reproducable [reproducible] tuning?
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 07:51:42 -0400 |
40 lines |
Crosspost from Clavichord Yahoogroups - DCS weekend
|
Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 18:51:10 +0100 |
159 lines |
Re: curious LP -
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 15:21:30 -0500 |
25 lines |
curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 13:21:45 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 07:38:50 -0400 |
18 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 07:11:02 -0500 |
28 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 22:50:56 +1000 |
89 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 08:45:28 -0500 |
34 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 09:45:53 -0400 |
23 lines |
curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 21:13:46 +0200 |
29 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 22:16:38 +0400 |
26 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 22:04:10 -0400 |
17 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 07:36:38 +0400 |
47 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 21:17:44 +1000 |
68 lines |
Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"
|
Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 21:24:34 +1000 |
60 lines |
curly 08/15, was Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 11:50:15 -0700 |
29 lines |
de-obfuscation and insignificant figures
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 12:54:38 -0400 |
125 lines |
Re: de-obfuscation and insignificant figures
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 12:52:49 -0600 |
27 lines |
Discreet self advertizing for restricted Scandinavian audience
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 08:27:21 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Discreet self advertizing for restricted Scandinavian audience
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 12:37:19 -0400 |
14 lines |
Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 1 May 2006 09:05:52 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 2 May 2006 13:09:15 -0400 |
33 lines |
Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 00:57:58 +0200 |
85 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 18:54:42 -0600 |
56 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 21:49:03 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 11 May 2006 09:50:25 -0700 |
105 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 11 May 2006 16:10:30 -0400 |
43 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 11 May 2006 15:41:58 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 07:05:01 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 07:33:16 -0700 |
136 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 22:24:35 +0400 |
47 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 04:14:03 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 11:30:15 +0200 |
43 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 06:10:08 -0400 |
61 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 07:12:50 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation
|
Dean <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 14:00:05 +0200 |
34 lines |
English Harpsichord Magazine vol. 4 no. 2, 1986
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 13:00:22 +0200 |
23 lines |
Re: English Harpsichord Magazine vol. 4 no. 2, 1986
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 06:34:00 -0700 |
12 lines |
Fess up you blokes!
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
15 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 07:50:12 -0400 |
57 lines |
Fess up you blokes!
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 20:01:31 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
18 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 17:41:39 -0400 |
159 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 19:09:14 -0500 |
12 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 14:32:38 +1000 |
19 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 10:43:11 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
23 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 06:47:00 -0500 |
25 lines |
Re: Fess up you blokes!
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 15:09:49 -0400 |
42 lines |
Flemish string gauges
|
Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 05:59:26 -0400 |
13 lines |
Florida trip
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 1 May 2006 18:16:22 +0000 |
16 lines |
Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 12:45:50 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 02:13:42 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 13:06:05 +0200 |
15 lines |
Re: Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame
|
Jenny Rowland <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 14:29:49 +0100 |
21 lines |
FP question
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 09:23:53 -0500 |
30 lines |
Re: FP question
|
Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 29 May 2006 11:04:32 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: FP question
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 29 May 2006 10:27:47 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: FP question
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 29 May 2006 18:41:54 -0400 |
26 lines |
Free, public-domain Mathematica-clone for tuning calculations. was Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 07:57:26 -0700 |
32 lines |
Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 10:48:19 -0400 |
44 lines |
Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 08:15:27 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 13:25:42 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 10:44:16 -0700 |
52 lines |
Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 16:49:38 -0500 |
48 lines |
Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 06:45:04 +0100 |
35 lines |
Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 21:56:31 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 22:49:10 -0500 |
40 lines |
Fwd: Middle East Hpschd teacher?
|
Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 00:19:59 -0700 |
37 lines |
Goldberg Variations in various temperaments
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 9 May 2006 20:33:48 +0200 |
25 lines |
Graebner?
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 22:08:10 +0200 |
46 lines |
Re: Graebner?
|
Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 14:02:04 -0700 |
28 lines |
Re: Graebner?
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 16:05:21 -0700 |
13 lines |
Graebner?
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 16:49:19 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: Graebner?
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 08:32:07 -0700 |
32 lines |
Happy Froberger's 390th Birthday
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 11:49:33 +0200 |
16 lines |
harpsichords during the French revolution
|
Jessica Wood <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 29 May 2006 17:02:04 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: harpsichords during the French revolution
|
Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 29 May 2006 18:29:26 -0400 |
23 lines |
harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Wright <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 06:17:07 -0700 |
17 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 09:34:09 -0400 |
57 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 10:45:53 -0400 |
30 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 14:53:54 -0400 |
41 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Wright <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 03:29:42 -0700 |
60 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Wright <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 03:50:55 -0700 |
44 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 07:01:18 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Wright <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 04:10:23 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 07:17:10 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 12:22:41 +0000 |
17 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 14:31:43 +0000 |
11 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Wright <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 08:52:49 -0700 |
32 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
David Wright <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 09:03:23 -0700 |
30 lines |
Re: harpsichords in the mid-west
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 15:48:07 -0500 |
31 lines |
Haydn on harpsichord in Dent
|
Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 16:44:59 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: Hewitt etc ... Gould in Goldbergs
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 29 May 2006 18:52:51 -0400 |
31 lines |
Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Worldschmitz at Yahoo <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 18:27:54 +0100 |
154 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 17:00:34 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 17:51:57 -0400 |
81 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 23:37:55 -0600 |
101 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 09:20:01 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 06:20:32 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 08:02:55 -0400 |
104 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 08:56:16 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 09:19:26 -0400 |
25 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 09:46:02 -0400 |
51 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 09:53:37 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 29 May 2006 14:23:37 -0600 |
92 lines |
HPSCHD-L
|
Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 12:15:08 -0500 |
26 lines |
Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 May 2006 to 27 May 2006 (#2006-169)
|
J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 09:05:56 +0000 |
56 lines |
Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 May 2006 to 27 May 2006 (#2006-169)
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 07:16:04 -0500 |
27 lines |
Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 07:47:58 -0700 |
35 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 11:32:54 EDT |
13 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 12:54:38 -0400 |
45 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 11:22:56 -0700 |
27 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 11:29:37 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 20:33:55 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 12:45:07 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 23:28:52 +0200 |
22 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 06:13:51 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 06:57:41 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 13:00:59 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 19:22:53 +0200 |
30 lines |
Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned
|
David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 08:32:37 -0700 |
22 lines |
I am not a temperament... I am a free man!
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 30 May 2006 19:45:06 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 30 May 2006 16:34:38 -0400 |
87 lines |
Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 02:10:01 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!
|
dc <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 09:00:41 +0200 |
17 lines |
Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 09:25:05 -0400 |
108 lines |
Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 22:39:52 -0400 |
16 lines |
If it ain't equal...
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 19:03:17 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: If it ain't equal...
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 10:36:34 -0700 |
50 lines |
Re: If it ain't equal...
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 20:14:38 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: If it ain't equal...
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 12:53:32 +0200 |
23 lines |
In defense of NUT CASES
|
Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 11:22:55 +0200 |
16 lines |
In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 02:08:50 -0400 |
45 lines |
In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 02:51:21 +0200 |
50 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 00:16:26 +0200 |
45 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 03:08:19 +0400 |
43 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 20:11:17 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 07:30:49 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 03:01:59 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 17:16:30 +0200 |
92 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 13:42:16 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly?
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 23:02:28 -0400 |
60 lines |
Re: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 00:26:52 -0500 |
28 lines |
In place of spreadsheets
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 22:01:11 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: In place of spreadsheets
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 17:33:27 -0400 |
111 lines |
Re: In place of spreadsheets
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 07:39:40 +0400 |
23 lines |
Re: In place of spreadsheets
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 12:55:40 -0400 |
29 lines |
Instruction: How to invent an modern 20th century-style squiggle-tuning fake temperament for absoulte-pitch hearers.
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 08:49:45 -0700 |
116 lines |
just checking - other meantones
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 06:57:37 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: just checking - other meantones
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 00:58:11 -0400 |
40 lines |
Last report on the AMIS/Galpin/CIMCIM meeting in Vermillion
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 18:36:03 +0000 |
54 lines |
Lecture of Mark Lindley - Update
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 3 May 2006 17:10:50 +0200 |
36 lines |
Lecture of Mark Lindley - Update
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 21:23:14 +0200 |
100 lines |
Lindley on Schlick's beating, was Re: In place of spreadsheets
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 11:53:20 -0700 |
96 lines |
location of previous high visibility list members
|
Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 19:33:11 +1000 |
13 lines |
Re: location of previous high visibility list members
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
30 lines |
Re: location of previous high visibility list members
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:46 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: location of previous high visibility list members
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 21:29:59 +0400 |
32 lines |
Re: location of previous high visibility list members
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 11:06:34 -0700 |
51 lines |
Re: location of previous high visibility list members
|
Zach <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 16:10:29 -0400 |
23 lines |
Luebeck recording
|
Scheide, Kathleen <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 9 May 2006 15:30:30 -0500 |
15 lines |
Re: Luebeck recording
|
J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 9 May 2006 21:13:11 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: Luebeck recording
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 9 May 2006 20:25:56 -0600 |
64 lines |
Re: Luebeck recording
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 23:55:40 +0200 |
39 lines |
Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 12:22:58 +0000 |
15 lines |
Re: Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 08:52:23 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 08:51:05 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 13:08:54 +0000 |
15 lines |
Mersenne / Sauveur / Werckmeister
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 18:14:48 +0200 |
79 lines |
Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 17:11:15 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 12:31:53 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 07:30:24 +0100 |
38 lines |
Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 09:12:52 +0200 |
19 lines |
Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 01:25:49 -0700 |
19 lines |
Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 14:41:39 +0200 |
32 lines |
Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 12:51:03 -0400 |
29 lines |
Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 11:49:55 -0700 |
96 lines |
Re: Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case
|
willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 12:26:17 -0700 |
104 lines |
Re: Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 13:15:39 -0700 |
31 lines |
MGG
|
Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 17:22:05 +0100 |
24 lines |
Montreal festival
|
Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 09:08:20 -0400 |
13 lines |
Re: Montreal festival
|
Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 19:42:41 -0400 |
37 lines |
Re: more fessing up..*******
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 11:08:42 +0000 |
24 lines |
more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.
|
Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 11:04:11 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.
|
dc <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 17:21:30 +0200 |
18 lines |
Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.
|
Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 12:18:34 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 16:34:39 -0400 |
80 lines |
Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 08:35:26 -0500 |
35 lines |
More on obfuscation
|
Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 17:00:00 -0700 |
88 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 18:37:26 -0600 |
29 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 06:16:24 +0200 |
23 lines |
More on obfuscation
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 22:13:45 +0200 |
53 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 15:56:10 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 18:20:37 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 17:20:59 -0500 |
58 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 07:51:50 +0200 |
28 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 08:30:08 -0400 |
49 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 09:11:01 -0400 |
90 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 23:22:53 +0400 |
21 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 20:12:46 -0500 |
29 lines |
Re: More on obfuscation
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 07:57:15 +0400 |
22 lines |
Neidhardt ignoring the schisma
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 18:11:59 -0400 |
40 lines |
News from Vermillion: Day 3
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 13:10:13 +0000 |
68 lines |
numerical precision
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 12:35:48 +0000 |
21 lines |
Nut case
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 04:15:58 -0400 |
58 lines |
oars in the water?
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 12:27:29 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: oars in the water?
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 07:27:15 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: oars in the water?
|
Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 15:34:43 +0100 |
50 lines |
off list - Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 13:15:16 +0200 |
48 lines |
On the fly
|
Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 06:44:49 +0100 |
29 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 03:15:53 -0400 |
16 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 09:27:56 +0100 |
34 lines |
On the fly
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 11:12:44 +0200 |
24 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 08:15:04 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 12:05:32 +0000 |
29 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 14:40:08 +0200 |
63 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 13:20:57 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 05:40:59 -0400 |
34 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 09:18:21 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 10:39:50 -0400 |
99 lines |
Re: On the fly
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 10:57:52 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: On the fly and on the road
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 01:49:02 +0000 |
28 lines |
Re: On the fly and on the road
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 08:09:14 -0400 |
23 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 09:37:43 -0400 |
39 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 15:18:42 +0100 |
39 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 10:43:33 -0400 |
38 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 13:06:54 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 09:26:29 +0200 |
44 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 07:44:29 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 08:21:50 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers
|
David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 20:14:30 +0100 |
31 lines |
Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful
|
Paul Rabin <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 14:14:24 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 14:24:11 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful
|
Chris <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 20:29:55 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 14:33:20 -0400 |
14 lines |
OT: 18th century dancer
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 5 May 2006 10:48:16 -0400 |
20 lines |
OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?
|
David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 22:40:24 +0100 |
14 lines |
Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 18:15:07 -0400 |
20 lines |
Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?
|
Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 19:21:23 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 19:49:43 -0400 |
36 lines |
Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 21:00:18 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 06:44:48 +0400 |
27 lines |
Ottavinos and octave harpsichords
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 4 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
15 lines |
PDQ
|
[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 15:41:16 -0400 |
86 lines |
Re: PDQ
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 21:07:13 -0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences (Tom Dent's ordinaire)
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 12:27:32 -0400 |
121 lines |
Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences (Tom Dent's ordinaire)
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 21:18:23 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 11:06:29 +0100 |
37 lines |
Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 09:09:18 -0700 |
43 lines |
Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 23:22:35 +0400 |
41 lines |
Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 15:46:52 +0200 |
37 lines |
popular misinformation
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 6 May 2006 21:28:07 +0200 |
26 lines |
Re: popular misinformation
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 07:16:19 -0400 |
76 lines |
Re: popular misinformation
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 14:36:24 -0400 |
150 lines |
Re: popular misinformation
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 22:50:09 +0200 |
39 lines |
Re: popular misinformation
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 22:22:05 -0400 |
54 lines |
Re: popular misinformation
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 7 May 2006 22:44:23 -0400 |
27 lines |
Re: popular misinformation
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 03:02:09 -0400 |
87 lines |
Quite different form of obfuscation
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 03:09:09 +0200 |
30 lines |
Random Goldberg things
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:36 +0200 |
34 lines |
Re: Random Goldberg things
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 11 May 2006 07:17:17 +0400 |
22 lines |
Report From South Dakota via Savannah cont.
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 20:50:54 +0000 |
31 lines |
Report from South Dakota, Day 2
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 13:16:53 +0000 |
58 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 11:36:07 +0000 |
31 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2
|
David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 16:09:52 +0100 |
28 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 09:05:57 -0700 |
19 lines |
Report from South Dakota, Day 2
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 12:13:41 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 21:19:01 +0000 |
20 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 06:16:20 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 4
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 14:27:17 +0000 |
40 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 4
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 13:11:04 -0400 |
21 lines |
Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 13:34:18 +0000 |
39 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 10:47:28 -0400 |
19 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 16:25:37 +0100 |
22 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 01:24:05 +0000 |
54 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 22:08:56 -0400 |
59 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 02:59:33 +0000 |
10 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 02:42:24 -0400 |
32 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
David Pickett <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 06:45:59 -0400 |
28 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 06:14:51 -0700 |
21 lines |
Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit
|
Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 26 May 2006 16:01:17 -0400 |
28 lines |
Report from Vermillion
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 12:58:39 +0000 |
49 lines |
Ruckers 2x8,1x4 (was Concert review)
|
Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 10:56:01 -0400 |
53 lines |
Schlick hexachords
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 11:30:21 +0200 |
33 lines |
Re: Schlick hexachords
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 10:13:15 -0400 |
50 lines |
Schlick hexachords
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 18:20:58 +0200 |
38 lines |
Re: Schlick hexachords
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 07:05:11 +0200 |
17 lines |
Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 11:49:03 -0700 |
85 lines |
Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 15:09:11 -0600 |
125 lines |
Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 07:59:38 +0100 |
33 lines |
Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 08:26:34 -0600 |
45 lines |
Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Charles <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 18:19:33 +0200 |
55 lines |
Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 23:18:59 +0100 |
26 lines |
Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 21:02:57 -0600 |
71 lines |
Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 09:35:36 +0400 |
31 lines |
solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales...
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 09:50:03 -0400 |
70 lines |
Re: solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales...
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 14:10:34 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales... (no harpsichord content)
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 24 May 2006 12:00:40 -0400 |
112 lines |
spell-checkers
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 12:51:43 +0200 |
54 lines |
Re: spell-checkers
|
D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 13:24:38 +0200 |
69 lines |
Re: spell-checkers
|
Stephen Rumpf <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 14:33:09 -0400 |
56 lines |
Re: spell-checkers
|
Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 14:42:49 -0400 |
106 lines |
Sperrhacke jack conversions
|
Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 07:38:31 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: Sperrhacke jack conversions
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 08:57:31 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: Sperrhacke jack conversions
|
Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 10:37:51 -0700 |
52 lines |
Spreadsheet smeadsheet
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 02:56:06 -0400 |
45 lines |
Squiggles and giggles
|
Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 15:22:02 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Squiggles and giggles
|
Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 06:43:20 +0100 |
24 lines |
Squirrels
|
Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 02:16:05 -0700 |
13 lines |
Strange Tuning Venues
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 08:52:33 -0700 |
22 lines |
Re: Strange Tuning Venues
|
C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 8 May 2006 11:45:18 -0500 |
11 lines |
String gauges
|
Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 25 May 2006 07:53:09 -0400 |
24 lines |
Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 08:51:44 +0100 |
25 lines |
Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 01:16:12 -0700 |
17 lines |
Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 19:00:10 +1000 |
45 lines |
Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
24 lines |
Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 08:47:01 +0000 |
56 lines |
Subject: Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 02:40:47 -0400 |
94 lines |
Technician for Iowa
|
Glenn Giuttari <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 12:08:25 -0400 |
21 lines |
Re: Technician for Iowa
|
Martha N. Folts <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 13:49:07 -0400 |
46 lines |
test pieces for Bach tuning
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 1 May 2006 10:28:40 -0400 |
61 lines |
the audible schisma
|
Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 17:59:47 -0400 |
31 lines |
The Dull List
|
Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 10 May 2006 07:08:50 -0400 |
30 lines |
The Flint Collection with Davitt Moroney
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 20:59:30 -0400 |
66 lines |
Re: The harpsichord jack
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 1 May 2006 08:56:13 +0200 |
68 lines |
Re: The harpsichord jack
|
Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 1 May 2006 08:42:50 +0100 |
65 lines |
Re: The harpsichord jack
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 1 May 2006 08:48:14 +0000 |
71 lines |
The importance of 18th century squiggles
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 21 May 2006 12:48:12 +0000 |
15 lines |
Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 02:50:07 -0400 |
35 lines |
Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 16:16:52 -0400 |
65 lines |
Re: Those ... squiggles again
|
Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 23:00:28 -0400 |
47 lines |
Those Bach squiggles again
|
Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 12:15:59 -0400 |
48 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 12:43:55 -0400 |
33 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 12:39:58 -0600 |
173 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 22:43:15 +0400 |
39 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 11:49:31 -0700 |
70 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:57 -0600 |
22 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 20:39:58 +0100 |
64 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 00:23:35 +0400 |
42 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 22:52:19 +0200 |
51 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 23:32:06 +0100 |
74 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 16:27:09 -0600 |
70 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 06:56:34 +0400 |
93 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 12 May 2006 22:27:38 -0600 |
59 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 13 May 2006 19:17:34 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 14 May 2006 16:10:43 -0400 |
52 lines |
Re: Those Bach squiggles again
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 15 May 2006 03:14:30 +0400 |
40 lines |
Urbino intarsia?
|
Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 03:18:33 -0700 |
24 lines |
Re: Urbino intarsia?
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 06:31:08 -0700 |
29 lines |
Van Immerseel Mozart Ctos to be re-released
|
James McCarty <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 27 May 2006 11:03:06 -0500 |
22 lines |
virginals and spinets
|
dc <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 09:47:16 +0200 |
17 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
17 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 07:46:18 -0400 |
29 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
dc <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 14:06:47 +0200 |
52 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 05:50:21 -0700 |
36 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 10:13:48 -0400 |
15 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
John Howell <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 12:06:18 -0400 |
31 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 13:03:50 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 10:34:25 -0700 |
31 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 16 May 2006 16:09:52 +0000 |
44 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 09:28:00 +0400 |
23 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
13 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Massimo Nespolo <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 07:58:49 +0200 |
20 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 08:27:00 +0100 |
27 lines |
Re: virginals and spinets
|
dc <[log in to unmask]> |
Thu, 18 May 2006 09:51:37 +0200 |
21 lines |
Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]> |
Mon, 22 May 2006 21:34:00 -0600 |
36 lines |
Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 07:28:31 +0200 |
103 lines |
Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 03:09:07 -0400 |
22 lines |
Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 01:38:00 -0700 |
38 lines |
Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 10:45:43 +0200 |
21 lines |
Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.
|
Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 23 May 2006 19:50:51 -0400 |
38 lines |
was: Nuts
|
J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]> |
Fri, 19 May 2006 09:49:22 +0200 |
25 lines |
westward ho, maybe
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Wed, 31 May 2006 00:04:38 +0000 |
12 lines |
Re: westward ho, maybe
|
Larry Kent <[log in to unmask]> |
Tue, 30 May 2006 21:38:18 -0400 |
30 lines |
who is this person?
|
Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 18:03:04 +0000 |
18 lines |
Re: who is this person?
|
Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 14:06:19 -0500 |
36 lines |
Re: who is this person?
|
Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]> |
Sun, 28 May 2006 15:21:16 -0400 |
22 lines |
Worlds toughest does it again
|
Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]> |
Sat, 20 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT |
17 lines |
