LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


May 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

****Jumping the Shark (3 messages)
... but some temperaments are more equal than others (6 messages)
08/15, OT. stamping on collective breaks (1 message)
1/2 retraction (1 message)
18th century dancer (1 message)
5 1/2 octaves (6 messages)
A new balance mortice punch for me. (1 message)
A Sassman appears (1 message)
A tale for a sinner (2 messages)
a tale of Picchi (1 message)
an hour to set up meantone?! (4 messages)
Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets (4 messages)
Barafostus' Dreame (5 messages)
Baroque music in Bolivia/Zipoli etc. (1 message)
Berkeley Festival update (1 message)
books cost more than harpsichords (5 messages)
brokeback harpsichord (4 messages)
BWV 552 (2 messages)
BWV 622 and 671, etc (1 message)
Concert review (3 messages)
Contact Request (1 message)
Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it. (3 messages)
Criterions for an scientific .. yada yada (1 message)
Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? (8 messages)
Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again (5 messages)
Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long (5 messages)
Criterions [Criteria] for an [a] scientific[ally] reproducable [reproducible] tuning? (1 message)
Crosspost from Clavichord Yahoogroups - DCS weekend (1 message)
curious LP - (1 message)
curious LP - "1720 Cristofori" (12 messages)
curly 08/15, was Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man! (1 message)
de-obfuscation and insignificant figures (2 messages)
Discreet self advertizing for restricted Scandinavian audience (2 messages)
Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday (11 messages)
Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation (5 messages)
English Harpsichord Magazine vol. 4 no. 2, 1986 (2 messages)
Fess up you blokes! (11 messages)
Flemish string gauges (1 message)
Florida trip (1 message)
Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame (4 messages)
FP question (4 messages)
Free, public-domain Mathematica-clone for tuning calculations. was Re: In place of ... what, exactly? (1 message)
Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers (8 messages)
Fwd: Middle East Hpschd teacher? (1 message)
Goldberg Variations in various temperaments (1 message)
Graebner? (5 messages)
Happy Froberger's 390th Birthday (1 message)
harpsichords during the French revolution (2 messages)
harpsichords in the mid-west (14 messages)
Haydn on harpsichord in Dent (1 message)
Hewitt etc ... Gould in Goldbergs (1 message)
Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord (12 messages)
HPSCHD-L (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 May 2006 to 27 May 2006 (#2006-169) (2 messages)
Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned (13 messages)
I am not a temperament... I am a free man! (6 messages)
If it ain't equal... (4 messages)
In defense of NUT CASES (1 message)
In place of ... what, exactly? (10 messages)
In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences. (1 message)
In place of spreadsheets (4 messages)
Instruction: How to invent an modern 20th century-style squiggle-tuning fake temperament for absoulte-pitch hearers. (1 message)
just checking - other meantones (2 messages)
Last report on the AMIS/Galpin/CIMCIM meeting in Vermillion (1 message)
Lecture of Mark Lindley - Update (2 messages)
Lindley on Schlick's beating, was Re: In place of spreadsheets (1 message)
location of previous high visibility list members (6 messages)
Luebeck recording (4 messages)
Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance (4 messages)
Mersenne / Sauveur / Werckmeister (1 message)
Methodology for interpreting squiggles (7 messages)
Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case (3 messages)
MGG (1 message)
Montreal festival (2 messages)
more fessing up..******* (1 message)
more fessing up... keyboard training? etc. (5 messages)
More on obfuscation (13 messages)
Neidhardt ignoring the schisma (1 message)
News from Vermillion: Day 3 (1 message)
numerical precision (1 message)
Nut case (1 message)
oars in the water? (3 messages)
off list - Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers (1 message)
On the fly (12 messages)
On the fly and on the road (2 messages)
On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers (8 messages)
Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful (4 messages)
OT: 18th century dancer (1 message)
OT: Criterions for "Criterions"? (6 messages)
Ottavinos and octave harpsichords (1 message)
PDQ (2 messages)
Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences (Tom Dent's ordinaire) (2 messages)
Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences. (4 messages)
popular misinformation (7 messages)
Quite different form of obfuscation (1 message)
Random Goldberg things (2 messages)
Report From South Dakota via Savannah cont. (1 message)
Report from South Dakota, Day 2 (7 messages)
Report from South Dakota, Day 4 (2 messages)
Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit (10 messages)
Report from Vermillion (1 message)
Ruckers 2x8,1x4 (was Concert review) (1 message)
Schlick hexachords (4 messages)
Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles (8 messages)
solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales... (2 messages)
solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales... (no harpsichord content) (1 message)
spell-checkers (4 messages)
Sperrhacke jack conversions (3 messages)
Spreadsheet smeadsheet (1 message)
Squiggles and giggles (2 messages)
Squirrels (1 message)
Strange Tuning Venues (2 messages)
String gauges (1 message)
Subject: 5 1/2 octaves (5 messages)
Subject: Re: Those ... squiggles again (1 message)
Technician for Iowa (2 messages)
test pieces for Bach tuning (1 message)
the audible schisma (1 message)
The Dull List (1 message)
The Flint Collection with Davitt Moroney (1 message)
The harpsichord jack (3 messages)
The importance of 18th century squiggles (1 message)
Those ... squiggles again (3 messages)
Those Bach squiggles again (16 messages)
Urbino intarsia? (2 messages)
Van Immerseel Mozart Ctos to be re-released (1 message)
virginals and spinets (15 messages)
Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences. (6 messages)
was: Nuts (1 message)
westward ho, maybe (2 messages)
who is this person? (3 messages)
Worlds toughest does it again (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

****Jumping the Shark

****Jumping the Shark

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 11:31:37 -0700

27 lines

Re: ****Jumping the Shark

Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 12:11:56 -0700

29 lines

Re: ****Jumping the Shark

Robert C L Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 15:23:08 -0400

15 lines

New Thread

... but some temperaments are more equal than others

... but some temperaments are more equal than others

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2006 18:15:15 +0200

46 lines

Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2006 12:42:49 -0400

51 lines

Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2006 23:29:15 +0400

31 lines

Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others

Pierre-Henri Jondot <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 13:23:09 +0200

44 lines

Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 17:45:03 +0200

20 lines

Re: ... but some temperaments are more equal than others

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 21:28:06 +0400

24 lines

New Thread

08/15, OT. stamping on collective breaks

Re: 08/15, OT. stamping on collective breaks

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 16:56:07 -0400

32 lines

New Thread

1/2 retraction

1/2 retraction

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 13:57:31 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

18th century dancer

18th century dancer

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 14:37:46 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

5 1/2 octaves

5 1/2 octaves

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 18:41:34 +1000

16 lines

Re: 5 1/2 octaves

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

15 lines

Re: 5 1/2 octaves

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 09:20:59 +0000

50 lines

5 1/2 octaves

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 23:10:23 +0200

21 lines

Re: 5 1/2 octaves

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 07:46:04 +0400

25 lines

Re: 5 1/2 octaves

J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 11:59:21 +0200

44 lines

New Thread

A new balance mortice punch for me.

A new balance mortice punch for me.

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

22 lines

New Thread

A Sassman appears

A Sassman appears

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 19:27:59 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

A tale for a sinner

A tale for a sinner

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

20 lines

Re: A tale for a sinner

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 14:28:32 +1000

35 lines

New Thread

a tale of Picchi

a tale of Picchi

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 09:12:57 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

an hour to set up meantone?!

an hour to set up meantone?!

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2006 14:30:41 -0400

48 lines

Re: an hour to set up meantone?!

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2006 16:44:08 -0400

41 lines

Re: an hour to set up meantone?!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2006 19:48:53 -0500

31 lines

Re: an hour to set up meantone?!

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 10:56:13 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets

Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 22:33:58 +0000

50 lines

Re: Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 22:25:19 -0400

37 lines

Re: Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 02:33:23 +0000

17 lines

Re: Anglo-centric personal attacks and spreadsheets

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 07:34:31 +0200

67 lines

New Thread

Barafostus' Dreame

Barafostus' Dreame

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 17:25:40 +0000

12 lines

Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 10:57:35 -0700

21 lines

Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 19:12:32 +0100

15 lines

Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 19:43:08 +0000

28 lines

Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 13:31:38 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Baroque music in Bolivia/Zipoli etc.

Baroque music in Bolivia/Zipoli etc.

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 07:22:29 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Berkeley Festival update

Berkeley Festival update

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 10:23:33 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

books cost more than harpsichords

books cost more than harpsichords

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 19:40:47 -0400

18 lines

Re: books cost more than harpsichords

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 20:22:43 -0400

22 lines

Re: books cost more than harpsichords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 06:15:02 +0200

24 lines

Re: books cost more than harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 08:33:56 +0400

37 lines

Re: books cost more than harpsichords

Massimo Nespolo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 07:53:28 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

brokeback harpsichord

brokeback harpsichord

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 01:54:17 -0700

49 lines

Re: brokeback harpsichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 08:43:57 -0400

62 lines

Re: brokeback harpsichord

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 09:38:29 -0700

30 lines

Re: brokeback harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 22:58:07 +0400

74 lines

New Thread

BWV 552

BWV 552

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 22:30:52 -0400

31 lines

BWV 552

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 17:39:10 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

BWV 622 and 671, etc

BWV 622 and 671, etc

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 17:47:21 -0400

68 lines

New Thread

Concert review

Concert review

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 02:05:24 -0400

43 lines

Re: Concert review

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

20 lines

Re: Concert review

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 05:41:40 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Contact Request

Contact Request

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 14:51:47 -0400

16 lines

New Thread

Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it.

Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it.

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 11:29:37 -0700

26 lines

Re: Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it.

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 20:46:51 -0500

29 lines

Re: Conversion and Upgrades on older harpsichords is it worth it.

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2006 09:14:53 -0700

13 lines

New Thread

Criterions for an scientific .. yada yada

Re: Criterions for an scientific .. yada yada

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 23:29:56 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 08:23:30 +0100

31 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 09:36:35 +0200

32 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 18:50:29 +0400

25 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 18:49:47 +0200

41 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 13:29:38 -0400

37 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 20:37:40 +0000

40 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 06:40:37 +0400

52 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

29 lines

New Thread

Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again

Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 09:39:19 -0700

59 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 13:00:08 -0400

44 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 10:23:58 -0700

69 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 19:26:45 +0200

33 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? , was Re: Those ... squiggles again

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 11:55:06 -0600

52 lines

New Thread

Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 16:57:12 -0400

194 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 00:48:31 +0200

70 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 07:28:53 +0400

53 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 23:40:02 +0200

34 lines

Re: Criterions for an scientific reproducable tuning? An attempt of a translation and commentary. Not funny and very long

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 07:53:55 +0400

25 lines

New Thread

Criterions [Criteria] for an [a] scientific[ally] reproducable [reproducible] tuning?

Re: Criterions [Criteria] for an [a] scientific[ally] reproducable [reproducible] tuning?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 07:51:42 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Crosspost from Clavichord Yahoogroups - DCS weekend

Crosspost from Clavichord Yahoogroups - DCS weekend

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 18:51:10 +0100

159 lines

New Thread

curious LP -

Re: curious LP -

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 15:21:30 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 13:21:45 +0200

33 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 07:38:50 -0400

18 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 07:11:02 -0500

28 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 22:50:56 +1000

89 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 08:45:28 -0500

34 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 09:45:53 -0400

23 lines

curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 21:13:46 +0200

29 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 22:16:38 +0400

26 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 22:04:10 -0400

17 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 07:36:38 +0400

47 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 21:17:44 +1000

68 lines

Re: curious LP - "1720 Cristofori"

Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 21:24:34 +1000

60 lines

New Thread

curly 08/15, was Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

curly 08/15, was Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 11:50:15 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

de-obfuscation and insignificant figures

de-obfuscation and insignificant figures

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 12:54:38 -0400

125 lines

Re: de-obfuscation and insignificant figures

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 12:52:49 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Discreet self advertizing for restricted Scandinavian audience

Discreet self advertizing for restricted Scandinavian audience

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 08:27:21 -0400

19 lines

Re: Discreet self advertizing for restricted Scandinavian audience

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 12:37:19 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2006 09:05:52 -0400

34 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 May 2006 13:09:15 -0400

33 lines

Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 00:57:58 +0200

85 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 18:54:42 -0600

56 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 21:49:03 +0200

21 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2006 09:50:25 -0700

105 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2006 16:10:30 -0400

43 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2006 15:41:58 -0600

36 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 07:05:01 +0200

18 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 07:33:16 -0700

136 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast yesterday

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 22:24:35 +0400

47 lines

New Thread

Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 04:14:03 -0400

37 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 11:30:15 +0200

43 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 06:10:08 -0400

61 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 07:12:50 -0400

21 lines

Re: Egarr's BBC 3 broadcast, now articulation

Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 14:00:05 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

English Harpsichord Magazine vol. 4 no. 2, 1986

English Harpsichord Magazine vol. 4 no. 2, 1986

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 13:00:22 +0200

23 lines

Re: English Harpsichord Magazine vol. 4 no. 2, 1986

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 06:34:00 -0700

12 lines

New Thread

Fess up you blokes!

Fess up you blokes!

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

15 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 07:50:12 -0400

57 lines

Fess up you blokes!

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 20:01:31 +0200

30 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

18 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 17:41:39 -0400

159 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 19:09:14 -0500

12 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 14:32:38 +1000

19 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 10:43:11 +0200

18 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

23 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 06:47:00 -0500

25 lines

Re: Fess up you blokes!

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 15:09:49 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Flemish string gauges

Flemish string gauges

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 05:59:26 -0400

13 lines

New Thread

Florida trip

Florida trip

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2006 18:16:22 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 12:45:50 -0700

43 lines

Re: Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 02:13:42 +0000

39 lines

Re: Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 13:06:05 +0200

15 lines

Re: Fortune was Re: Barafostus' Dreame

Jenny Rowland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 14:29:49 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

FP question

FP question

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 09:23:53 -0500

30 lines

Re: FP question

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2006 11:04:32 -0400

42 lines

Re: FP question

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2006 10:27:47 -0500

48 lines

Re: FP question

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2006 18:41:54 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Free, public-domain Mathematica-clone for tuning calculations. was Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Free, public-domain Mathematica-clone for tuning calculations. was Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 07:57:26 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 10:48:19 -0400

44 lines

Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 08:15:27 -0700

38 lines

Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 13:25:42 -0400

27 lines

Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 10:44:16 -0700

52 lines

Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 16:49:38 -0500

48 lines

Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 06:45:04 +0100

35 lines

Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 21:56:31 -0400

31 lines

Re: Fw: Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 22:49:10 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Middle East Hpschd teacher?

Fwd: Middle East Hpschd teacher?

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 00:19:59 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Goldberg Variations in various temperaments

Goldberg Variations in various temperaments

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2006 20:33:48 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

Graebner?

Graebner?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 22:08:10 +0200

46 lines

Re: Graebner?

Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 14:02:04 -0700

28 lines

Re: Graebner?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 16:05:21 -0700

13 lines

Graebner?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 16:49:19 +0200

26 lines

Re: Graebner?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 08:32:07 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Happy Froberger's 390th Birthday

Happy Froberger's 390th Birthday

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 11:49:33 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

harpsichords during the French revolution

harpsichords during the French revolution

Jessica Wood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2006 17:02:04 -0400

15 lines

Re: harpsichords during the French revolution

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2006 18:29:26 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

harpsichords in the mid-west

harpsichords in the mid-west

David Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 06:17:07 -0700

17 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 09:34:09 -0400

57 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 10:45:53 -0400

30 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 14:53:54 -0400

41 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 03:29:42 -0700

60 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 03:50:55 -0700

44 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 07:01:18 -0400

24 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 04:10:23 -0700

70 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 07:17:10 -0400

22 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 12:22:41 +0000

17 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 14:31:43 +0000

11 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 08:52:49 -0700

32 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

David Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 09:03:23 -0700

30 lines

Re: harpsichords in the mid-west

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 15:48:07 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Haydn on harpsichord in Dent

Haydn on harpsichord in Dent

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 16:44:59 -0400

111 lines

New Thread

Hewitt etc ... Gould in Goldbergs

Re: Hewitt etc ... Gould in Goldbergs

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2006 18:52:51 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Worldschmitz at Yahoo <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 18:27:54 +0100

154 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 17:00:34 -0400

31 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 17:51:57 -0400

81 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 23:37:55 -0600

101 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 09:20:01 +0100

33 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 06:20:32 -0400

22 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 08:02:55 -0400

104 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 08:56:16 -0400

24 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 09:19:26 -0400

25 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 09:46:02 -0400

51 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 09:53:37 -0400

24 lines

Re: Hewitt, and piano v. harpsichord

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 May 2006 14:23:37 -0600

92 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L

HPSCHD-L

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 12:15:08 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 May 2006 to 27 May 2006 (#2006-169)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 May 2006 to 27 May 2006 (#2006-169)

J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 09:05:56 +0000

56 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 May 2006 to 27 May 2006 (#2006-169)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 07:16:04 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 07:47:58 -0700

35 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 11:32:54 EDT

13 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 12:54:38 -0400

45 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 11:22:56 -0700

27 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 11:29:37 -0700

19 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 20:33:55 +0200

22 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 12:45:07 -0600

29 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 23:28:52 +0200

22 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 06:13:51 +0200

21 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 06:57:41 +0200

45 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 13:00:59 -0400

111 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 19:22:53 +0200

30 lines

Re: Humbuggery and obfuscation be damned

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 08:32:37 -0700

22 lines

New Thread

I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 19:45:06 +0200

18 lines

Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 16:34:38 -0400

87 lines

Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 02:10:01 -0400

23 lines

Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 09:00:41 +0200

17 lines

Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 09:25:05 -0400

108 lines

Re: I am not a temperament... I am a free man!

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 22:39:52 -0400

16 lines

New Thread

If it ain't equal...

If it ain't equal...

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 19:03:17 +0200

26 lines

Re: If it ain't equal...

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 10:36:34 -0700

50 lines

Re: If it ain't equal...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 20:14:38 -0400

27 lines

Re: If it ain't equal...

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 12:53:32 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

In defense of NUT CASES

In defense of NUT CASES

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 11:22:55 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

In place of ... what, exactly?

In place of ... what, exactly?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 02:08:50 -0400

45 lines

In place of ... what, exactly?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 02:51:21 +0200

50 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 00:16:26 +0200

45 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 03:08:19 +0400

43 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 20:11:17 -0400

49 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 07:30:49 +0200

18 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 03:01:59 -0400

27 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 17:16:30 +0200

92 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 13:42:16 -0400

65 lines

Re: In place of ... what, exactly?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 23:02:28 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Re: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 00:26:52 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

In place of spreadsheets

In place of spreadsheets

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 22:01:11 +0200

69 lines

Re: In place of spreadsheets

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 17:33:27 -0400

111 lines

Re: In place of spreadsheets

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 07:39:40 +0400

23 lines

Re: In place of spreadsheets

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 12:55:40 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Instruction: How to invent an modern 20th century-style squiggle-tuning fake temperament for absoulte-pitch hearers.

Instruction: How to invent an modern 20th century-style squiggle-tuning fake temperament for absoulte-pitch hearers.

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 08:49:45 -0700

116 lines

New Thread

just checking - other meantones

just checking - other meantones

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 06:57:37 -0400

20 lines

Re: just checking - other meantones

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 00:58:11 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Last report on the AMIS/Galpin/CIMCIM meeting in Vermillion

Last report on the AMIS/Galpin/CIMCIM meeting in Vermillion

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 18:36:03 +0000

54 lines

New Thread

Lecture of Mark Lindley - Update

Lecture of Mark Lindley - Update

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 May 2006 17:10:50 +0200

36 lines

Lecture of Mark Lindley - Update

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 21:23:14 +0200

100 lines

New Thread

Lindley on Schlick's beating, was Re: In place of spreadsheets

Lindley on Schlick's beating, was Re: In place of spreadsheets

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 11:53:20 -0700

96 lines

New Thread

location of previous high visibility list members

location of previous high visibility list members

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 19:33:11 +1000

13 lines

Re: location of previous high visibility list members

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

30 lines

Re: location of previous high visibility list members

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 09:05:46 +0000

39 lines

Re: location of previous high visibility list members

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 21:29:59 +0400

32 lines

Re: location of previous high visibility list members

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 11:06:34 -0700

51 lines

Re: location of previous high visibility list members

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 16:10:29 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Luebeck recording

Luebeck recording

Scheide, Kathleen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2006 15:30:30 -0500

15 lines

Re: Luebeck recording

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2006 21:13:11 -0400

56 lines

Re: Luebeck recording

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 May 2006 20:25:56 -0600

64 lines

Re: Luebeck recording

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 23:55:40 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance

Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 12:22:58 +0000

15 lines

Re: Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 08:52:23 -0400

33 lines

Re: Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 08:51:05 -0400

27 lines

Re: Luisa Morales and Scarlatti with dance

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 13:08:54 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

Mersenne / Sauveur / Werckmeister

Mersenne / Sauveur / Werckmeister

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 18:14:48 +0200

79 lines

New Thread

Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 17:11:15 +0200

69 lines

Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 12:31:53 -0400

21 lines

Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 07:30:24 +0100

38 lines

Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 09:12:52 +0200

19 lines

Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 01:25:49 -0700

19 lines

Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 14:41:39 +0200

32 lines

Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 12:51:03 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case

Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 11:49:55 -0700

96 lines

Re: Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 12:26:17 -0700

104 lines

Re: Methodology in tuning philosophy a: Re: Nut case

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 13:15:39 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

MGG

MGG

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 17:22:05 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Montreal festival

Montreal festival

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 09:08:20 -0400

13 lines

Re: Montreal festival

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 19:42:41 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

more fessing up..*******

Re: more fessing up..*******

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 11:08:42 +0000

24 lines

New Thread

more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.

more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 11:04:11 -0400

48 lines

Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 17:21:30 +0200

18 lines

Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 12:18:34 -0400

27 lines

Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 16:34:39 -0400

80 lines

Re: more fessing up... keyboard training? etc.

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 08:35:26 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

More on obfuscation

More on obfuscation

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 17:00:00 -0700

88 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 18:37:26 -0600

29 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 06:16:24 +0200

23 lines

More on obfuscation

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 22:13:45 +0200

53 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 15:56:10 -0500

29 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 18:20:37 -0400

20 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 17:20:59 -0500

58 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 07:51:50 +0200

28 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 08:30:08 -0400

49 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 09:11:01 -0400

90 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 23:22:53 +0400

21 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 20:12:46 -0500

29 lines

Re: More on obfuscation

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 07:57:15 +0400

22 lines

New Thread

Neidhardt ignoring the schisma

Neidhardt ignoring the schisma

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 18:11:59 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

News from Vermillion: Day 3

News from Vermillion: Day 3

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 13:10:13 +0000

68 lines

New Thread

numerical precision

numerical precision

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 12:35:48 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

Nut case

Nut case

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 04:15:58 -0400

58 lines

New Thread

oars in the water?

oars in the water?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 12:27:29 +0200

34 lines

Re: oars in the water?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 07:27:15 -0400

65 lines

Re: oars in the water?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 15:34:43 +0100

50 lines

New Thread

off list - Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

off list - Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 13:15:16 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

On the fly

On the fly

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 06:44:49 +0100

29 lines

Re: On the fly

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 03:15:53 -0400

16 lines

Re: On the fly

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 09:27:56 +0100

34 lines

On the fly

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 11:12:44 +0200

24 lines

Re: On the fly

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 08:15:04 +0000

29 lines

Re: On the fly

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 12:05:32 +0000

29 lines

Re: On the fly

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 14:40:08 +0200

63 lines

Re: On the fly

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 13:20:57 -0400

34 lines

Re: On the fly

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 05:40:59 -0400

34 lines

Re: On the fly

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 09:18:21 -0400

28 lines

Re: On the fly

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 10:39:50 -0400

99 lines

Re: On the fly

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 10:57:52 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

On the fly and on the road

Re: On the fly and on the road

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 01:49:02 +0000

28 lines

Re: On the fly and on the road

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 08:09:14 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 09:37:43 -0400

39 lines

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 15:18:42 +0100

39 lines

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 10:43:33 -0400

38 lines

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 13:06:54 -0400

27 lines

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 09:26:29 +0200

44 lines

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 07:44:29 -0400

27 lines

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 08:21:50 -0400

59 lines

Re: On the fly/Tuning & Synthesizers

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 20:14:30 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful

Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful

Paul Rabin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 14:14:24 -0400

21 lines

Re: Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 14:24:11 -0400

33 lines

Re: Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 20:29:55 +0200

38 lines

Re: Only slightly OT: Amazon trying to be helpful

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 14:33:20 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

OT: 18th century dancer

OT: 18th century dancer

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 May 2006 10:48:16 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?

OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 22:40:24 +0100

14 lines

Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 18:15:07 -0400

20 lines

Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 19:21:23 -0400

24 lines

Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 19:49:43 -0400

36 lines

Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 21:00:18 -0400

15 lines

Re: OT: Criterions for "Criterions"?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 06:44:48 +0400

27 lines

New Thread

Ottavinos and octave harpsichords

Ottavinos and octave harpsichords

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

15 lines

New Thread

PDQ

PDQ

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 15:41:16 -0400

86 lines

Re: PDQ

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 21:07:13 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences (Tom Dent's ordinaire)

Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences (Tom Dent's ordinaire)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 12:27:32 -0400

121 lines

Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences (Tom Dent's ordinaire)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 21:18:23 +0200

52 lines

New Thread

Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 11:06:29 +0100

37 lines

Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 09:09:18 -0700

43 lines

Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 23:22:35 +0400

41 lines

Re: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 15:46:52 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

popular misinformation

popular misinformation

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 May 2006 21:28:07 +0200

26 lines

Re: popular misinformation

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 07:16:19 -0400

76 lines

Re: popular misinformation

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 14:36:24 -0400

150 lines

Re: popular misinformation

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 22:50:09 +0200

39 lines

Re: popular misinformation

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 22:22:05 -0400

54 lines

Re: popular misinformation

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 May 2006 22:44:23 -0400

27 lines

Re: popular misinformation

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 03:02:09 -0400

87 lines

New Thread

Quite different form of obfuscation

Quite different form of obfuscation

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 03:09:09 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

Random Goldberg things

Random Goldberg things

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 17:31:36 +0200

34 lines

Re: Random Goldberg things

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 May 2006 07:17:17 +0400

22 lines

New Thread

Report From South Dakota via Savannah cont.

Report From South Dakota via Savannah cont.

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 20:50:54 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

Report from South Dakota, Day 2

Report from South Dakota, Day 2

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 13:16:53 +0000

58 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 11:36:07 +0000

31 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 16:09:52 +0100

28 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 09:05:57 -0700

19 lines

Report from South Dakota, Day 2

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 12:13:41 -0400

24 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 21:19:01 +0000

20 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 2

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 06:16:20 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Report from South Dakota, Day 4

Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 4

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 14:27:17 +0000

40 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota, Day 4

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 13:11:04 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 13:34:18 +0000

39 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 10:47:28 -0400

19 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 16:25:37 +0100

22 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 01:24:05 +0000

54 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 22:08:56 -0400

59 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 02:59:33 +0000

10 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 02:42:24 -0400

32 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 06:45:59 -0400

28 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 06:14:51 -0700

21 lines

Re: Report from South Dakota.....bit by bit

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 May 2006 16:01:17 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

Report from Vermillion

Report from Vermillion

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 12:58:39 +0000

49 lines

New Thread

Ruckers 2x8,1x4 (was Concert review)

Ruckers 2x8,1x4 (was Concert review)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 10:56:01 -0400

53 lines

New Thread

Schlick hexachords

Schlick hexachords

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 11:30:21 +0200

33 lines

Re: Schlick hexachords

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 10:13:15 -0400

50 lines

Schlick hexachords

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 18:20:58 +0200

38 lines

Re: Schlick hexachords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 07:05:11 +0200

17 lines

New Thread

Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 11:49:03 -0700

85 lines

Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 15:09:11 -0600

125 lines

Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 07:59:38 +0100

33 lines

Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 08:26:34 -0600

45 lines

Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 18:19:33 +0200

55 lines

Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 23:18:59 +0100

26 lines

Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 21:02:57 -0600

71 lines

Re: Shark jumping? was Re: Methodology for interpreting squiggles

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 09:35:36 +0400

31 lines

New Thread

solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales...

solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales...

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 09:50:03 -0400

70 lines

Re: solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales...

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 14:10:34 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales... (no harpsichord content)

Re: solfege with "be" syllable in minor scales... (no harpsichord content)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 May 2006 12:00:40 -0400

112 lines

New Thread

spell-checkers

spell-checkers

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 12:51:43 +0200

54 lines

Re: spell-checkers

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 13:24:38 +0200

69 lines

Re: spell-checkers

Stephen Rumpf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 14:33:09 -0400

56 lines

Re: spell-checkers

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 14:42:49 -0400

106 lines

New Thread

Sperrhacke jack conversions

Sperrhacke jack conversions

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 07:38:31 -0400

29 lines

Re: Sperrhacke jack conversions

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 08:57:31 -0700

24 lines

Re: Sperrhacke jack conversions

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 10:37:51 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Spreadsheet smeadsheet

Spreadsheet smeadsheet

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 02:56:06 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Squiggles and giggles

Squiggles and giggles

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 15:22:02 -0400

24 lines

Re: Squiggles and giggles

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 06:43:20 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Squirrels

Squirrels

Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 02:16:05 -0700

13 lines

New Thread

Strange Tuning Venues

Strange Tuning Venues

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 08:52:33 -0700

22 lines

Re: Strange Tuning Venues

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 May 2006 11:45:18 -0500

11 lines

New Thread

String gauges

String gauges

Thomas Donahue <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 May 2006 07:53:09 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Subject: 5 1/2 octaves

Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 08:51:44 +0100

25 lines

Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves

Chris Rowson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 01:16:12 -0700

17 lines

Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 19:00:10 +1000

45 lines

Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

24 lines

Re: Subject: 5 1/2 octaves

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 08:47:01 +0000

56 lines

New Thread

Subject: Re: Those ... squiggles again

Subject: Re: Those ... squiggles again

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 02:40:47 -0400

94 lines

New Thread

Technician for Iowa

Technician for Iowa

Glenn Giuttari <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 12:08:25 -0400

21 lines

Re: Technician for Iowa

Martha N. Folts <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 13:49:07 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

test pieces for Bach tuning

test pieces for Bach tuning

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2006 10:28:40 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

the audible schisma

the audible schisma

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 17:59:47 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

The Dull List

The Dull List

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 May 2006 07:08:50 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

The Flint Collection with Davitt Moroney

The Flint Collection with Davitt Moroney

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 20:59:30 -0400

66 lines

New Thread

The harpsichord jack

Re: The harpsichord jack

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2006 08:56:13 +0200

68 lines

Re: The harpsichord jack

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2006 08:42:50 +0100

65 lines

Re: The harpsichord jack

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 May 2006 08:48:14 +0000

71 lines

New Thread

The importance of 18th century squiggles

The importance of 18th century squiggles

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 May 2006 12:48:12 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

Those ... squiggles again

Re: Those ... squiggles again

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 02:50:07 -0400

35 lines

Re: Those ... squiggles again

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 16:16:52 -0400

65 lines

Re: Those ... squiggles again

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 23:00:28 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Those Bach squiggles again

Those Bach squiggles again

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 12:15:59 -0400

48 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 12:43:55 -0400

33 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 12:39:58 -0600

173 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 22:43:15 +0400

39 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 11:49:31 -0700

70 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 12:53:57 -0600

22 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 20:39:58 +0100

64 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 00:23:35 +0400

42 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 22:52:19 +0200

51 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 23:32:06 +0100

74 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 16:27:09 -0600

70 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 06:56:34 +0400

93 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 May 2006 22:27:38 -0600

59 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 May 2006 19:17:34 -0400

22 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 May 2006 16:10:43 -0400

52 lines

Re: Those Bach squiggles again

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 May 2006 03:14:30 +0400

40 lines

New Thread

Urbino intarsia?

Urbino intarsia?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 03:18:33 -0700

24 lines

Re: Urbino intarsia?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 06:31:08 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Van Immerseel Mozart Ctos to be re-released

Van Immerseel Mozart Ctos to be re-released

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 May 2006 11:03:06 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

virginals and spinets

virginals and spinets

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 09:47:16 +0200

17 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

17 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 07:46:18 -0400

29 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 14:06:47 +0200

52 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 05:50:21 -0700

36 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 10:13:48 -0400

15 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 12:06:18 -0400

31 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 13:03:50 -0400

22 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 10:34:25 -0700

31 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 May 2006 16:09:52 +0000

44 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 09:28:00 +0400

23 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

13 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Massimo Nespolo <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 07:58:49 +0200

20 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 08:27:00 +0100

27 lines

Re: virginals and spinets

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 May 2006 09:51:37 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 May 2006 21:34:00 -0600

36 lines

Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 07:28:31 +0200

103 lines

Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 03:09:07 -0400

22 lines

Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 01:38:00 -0700

38 lines

Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 10:45:43 +0200

21 lines

Re: Was: In place of ... what, exactly? now: Poll on Personal Temperament Preferences.

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 May 2006 19:50:51 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

was: Nuts

was: Nuts

J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 May 2006 09:49:22 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

westward ho, maybe

westward ho, maybe

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 31 May 2006 00:04:38 +0000

12 lines

Re: westward ho, maybe

Larry Kent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 May 2006 21:38:18 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

who is this person?

who is this person?

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 18:03:04 +0000

18 lines

Re: who is this person?

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 14:06:19 -0500

36 lines

Re: who is this person?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 May 2006 15:21:16 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

Worlds toughest does it again

Worlds toughest does it again

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 May 2006 00:00:00 GMT

17 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu