LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


March 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Norwegian" temperament? (4 messages)
*** Amps. (2 messages)
19th century temperament (1 message)
2006 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina (1 message)
5 1/2 octave kirckman (2 messages)
A hot harpsichord........ (15 messages)
A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation (1 message)
Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778 (3 messages)
Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778 / David Wright (2 messages)
ADMINISTRATIVE - ALL READ (1 message)
ADMINISTRATIVE -- ALL READ (1 message)
adress alan curtis anyone? (1 message)
Altnickol 1744 (1 message)
Another critic from hell? (18 messages)
another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment (6 messages)
apparel and JD Dulcken restoration (3 messages)
audience (8 messages)
audience, forgot (1 message)
australian WTC facsimiles (1 message)
AW: HPSCHD-L Digest - 7 Mar 2006 to 8 Mar 2006 - Special issue (#2006-81) (1 message)
Aye, there's the rub! (5 messages)
Aye, there's the rub! drifting way off topic (1 message)
Bach - Appoggiaturas (18 messages)
Bach - Appoggiaturas, now development towards Beethoven (2 messages)
Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole (11 messages)
Bach and Marpurg, adn the impossibility to make systems out of embellishment practice (5 messages)
Bach bibliographical question (5 messages)
Bach needs our help! (3 messages)
Bach Tuning Website (3 messages)
Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs (17 messages)
bach's gottesfurcht (42 messages)
bach's gottesfurcht/options (1 message)
Bach/keys (3 messages)
Bach/keys Clavier-Uebungen I-III (and Goldberg-Variations) (4 messages)
Bad BAD BAD (3 messages)
BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs (13 messages)
BBG V Improvisation? (1 message)
Beat counting and bean counting (2 messages)
Belated comment Re: Another critic from hell? (3 messages)
Belder Goldberg, Italian concerto, Stravinsky - was Re: Leon Berben WTC recording (1 message)
Bendeler, for Beginners (2 messages)
Books (3 messages)
Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan (3 messages)
Brad on Sunday mornings (1 message)
Brad's problem (1 message)
British Clavichord Society Awards to Rodger and Lynne Mirrey (1 message)
Building a harpsichord in ONE weekend? (1 message)
burning harpsichords (6 messages)
c'chord kit botch giveaway (8 messages)
challis jacks (3 messages)
change hpschd-l [log in to unmask] (1 message)
Circulating temperaments emphasizing foolproofness (1 message)
circulating temps with wide E-G# (5 messages)
clavichords and h-list (10 messages)
clavichords and h-list ( off topic issues) (4 messages)
Colin Tilney (1 message)
Couperin ordre 23: Gondoles de Delos (4 messages)
Creating the next generation of enthusiasts (1 message)
Dances with Wolves: etc. (1 message)
Dances with Wolves: etc. / Maihingen [...] (1 message)
Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals (6 messages)
David Cates's French Suites CDs on sale (1 message)
Delete function for email reading programs (1 message)
Desert island recordings (1 message)
Dictionaries. Was Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie (2 messages)
Dictionaries. Was: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie (3 messages)
discoveries..... found earlier (1 message)
discoveries: some relevant squiggles .... (33 messages)
discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament (2 messages)
discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament were already found earlier (5 messages)
doodle (5 messages)
Eagle feathers? (1 message)
Early music events in Paris and Prague? (1 message)
Easy septimal mod meantone II (3 messages)
Easy septimal modified meantone (1 message)
Egarr Review (1 message)
Egarr' instruments (1 message)
Fictional reference to one of our own. . . (6 messages)
French Suites (1 message)
fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach) (6 messages)
Friedrich Suppig's Diagrammatic Tunings (1 message)
Fw: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan (5 messages)
FW: Listserv Web Interface Downtime - Update (1 message)
FW: Yale Institute of Sacred Music (1 message)
Fwd: Europe Declares Pipe Organs Health Hazards (1 message)
Fwd: Schiller Institute and C=256Hz ? (typos corrected) (1 message)
GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle (6 messages)
George Malcolm/Rameau (9 messages)
Going to the dogs (was: musical ornithology) (1 message)
Goldbergs to be Played in Pittsburgh (2 messages)
Handel's (Händel's) or Mozart's n ose? (1 message)
handel's intellectual day, was bach's gottesfurcht (5 messages)
Handel/Händel in Haarlem (2 messages)
Harpsichord builders (1 message)
Harpsichord info sought (1 message)
Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think (10 messages)
Harpsichord program - help (27 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe (62 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe (bis) (1 message)
harpsichord wardrobe - dressage (6 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe - gilet (5 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt (3 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie (7 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie, the dictionary (2 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie, the face (1 message)
harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the tie (1 message)
harpsichord wardrobe, for Michael Smith (5 messages)
Harpsichord with soft and loud (2 messages)
Haurpsichord burning video, press releases and other crap (4 messages)
He's alive (1 message)
Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 (1 message)
Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Hel mstadt Manuscript (1 message)
Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript (2 messages)
Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript (1 message)
Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript (1 message)
Help! Beethoven conversation books vol 9 (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Archives -- March 2006 (#804) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 Mar 2006 to 27 Mar 2006 (#2006-107) (1 message)
Hubbard Stein was wardrobe (2 messages)
Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments (7 messages)
Hypothetical Histories (was some relevant squiggles) (2 messages)
In need of Trash (22 messages)
In search of a Bach Temperament (1 message)
Info about an Old Neupert Harpsichord (2 messages)
ink corrosion websites - Bach- and not-Bach-related (1 message)
Interesting Concert/Event in Kansas (1 message)
Inverno: Snow and Rain (1 message)
Is this not a great list? . . . (3 messages)
is this really going to work? (SCUSI) (2 messages)
Juillard Gift (7 messages)
Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century? (9 messages)
Leon Berben WTC recording (14 messages)
Lesson plans (2 messages)
lindley was buzzing (2 messages)
Listserv Web Interface Downtime - Today March 7 (fwd) (1 message)
long pedal points on hpsi (3 messages)
lutherie radio program on Internet (1 message)
Maendler-Schramm for sale (1 message)
Maihingen, once again, and other Organ Tuning related stuff (1 message)
Malcolm (5 messages)
malcolm/wanda (1 message)
March 21, 1685 (1 message)
Mattheson on Accent (3 messages)
meantone 101 (1 message)
Metrical value vs. temporal value (1 message)
Modern concert practice tale (1 message)
Motto Choices WAS bach's gottesfurcht/options (3 messages)
Mozart B-flat sonata (2 messages)
Mozart B-flat sonata K. 498a (1 message)
Mozart sonata for two (1 message)
Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith (6 messages)
Mozart sonata K.448 for 2 (29 messages)
Mozart sonata K.448, Bach, and conceit (3 messages)
Mssage for S. Rumpf (2 messages)
musical ornithology (10 messages)
My Harpsi-pad on the news (9 messages)
my harpsichord on the web (1 message)
New Clavichord (2 messages)
New EU proposal could limit what can be used in organ pipes (3 messages)
New on website (2 messages)
New topic! New builders? (22 messages)
NY Times Review of Egarr Concert (7 messages)
NY Times Review of Egarr Concert; 100 times too old? (2 messages)
Off topic: Re: What do you wear when you build a harpsichord? (2 messages)
OFF-TOPIC Strange ills afflict pipe organs of Europe (2 messages)
old Bach (5 messages)
old Bach NOW "ping" (1 message)
oops (1 message)
oops, was Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles .... (1 message)
Ordinaire meets Bach (15 messages)
Original Griepenkerl Text (1 message)
Original Griepenkerl text? (1 message)
OT amps, was Re: Another critic from hell? (1 message)
OT Business wardrobe (was harpsichord wardrobe) (4 messages)
OT postings, was Europe Declares Pipe Organs Health Hazards (1 message)
OT RE: Dictionaries. Was: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie (2 messages)
OT: (very OT but urgent): Update on Abdul Rahman (4 messages)
OT: Larouche (7 messages)
OT: Richard III, was Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles .... (1 message)
Outer boxes (2 messages)
Pin-tite (7 messages)
Pin-tite/paraffin/jumpy pins (1 message)
possible approach to mozart tuning (3 messages)
possible approach to mozart tuning, now onlist discoveries, part two (1 message)
practical advice: how to learn to listen to a natural septima (1 message)
Princeton Egarr concert (4 messages)
Problem with archives? (1 message)
Puzzlehead: a film that uses the harpsichord (1 message)
Rare Fruits Council (3 messages)
ratchety pin (1 message)
Recitals - announcement (1 message)
reference help on young Beethoven, hpschd content guaranteed (3 messages)
Relaxing things to do on your tea break, No.1 (1 message)
Request for data (1 message)
Richard Egarr concert (5 messages)
Ruckers string gauges (1 message)
Schiller Institute and C=256Hz ? (6 messages)
Schrader e-mail (2 messages)
scusi (1 message)
Slightly but not entirely off-topic Bach's birthday item (1 message)
Slowing down (3 messages)
Slowing down, was WARDROBE (3 messages)
Some tuning reflections (1 message)
Soprano and continuo cantatas tonight (1 message)
Sperrhake jacks (4 messages)
Sperrhake jacks, feathers (2 messages)
squiggles - some general thoughts - some details - part 1 (1 message)
squiggles - some general thoughts - some details - part 2 (1 message)
squiggles on the web (12 messages)
Squishing Bentsides full circle (5 messages)
Stolen instrument (1 message)
STOLEN OBOES/ OBOES ROBADOS (1 message)
Stop levers (3 messages)
Strange ills afflict pipe organs of Europe (1 message)
Suzuki program (1 message)
switzerland's finest (1 message)
Tangent bending (7 messages)
Tangent bending - clear thinking (2 messages)
The Battle of Prague. (5 messages)
The Helmstadt Manuscript (2 messages)
The Johann Sebsatian Bach Code (on the silent Rosetta stone, of course): Squiggles and Speculation (3 messages)
The LEGO harpsichord, revisited (1 message)
the Siena Pf (3 messages)
The Tagliavini CD (4 messages)
Tom Pixton (3 messages)
Topics that are ON (1 message)
Trade secrets in tuning (3 messages)
Trash (4 messages)
Trigger happy harpsichordists (2 messages)
Uncovering the strings (7 messages)
Urbino Intarsia or other small clavichords? (3 messages)
Utterly Bachian Bach (1 message)
Visual versus auditive, was Bach - Appoggiaturas (3 messages)
von Schönveld translation (1 message)
WARDROBE (3 messages)
Well, there was no need for me to be THAT grumpy ... (2 messages)
What do you wear when you build a harpsichord? (20 messages)
what's the "squiggle" squabble about? (32 messages)
what's the "squiggle" squabble about? Again: transposition and WTC, some organ works and the French Ouverture (1 message)
William Sperrhake shakes a beer and plays the clavezeng (1 message)
WTC instrument (12 messages)
WTC instruments (12 messages)
WTC- first print (1 message)
WTC-Facsimile (4 messages)
you need a web search engine (was: Bach needs our help!) (2 messages)
Younger builders (1 message)
ZHI Virginals stringing list (2 messages)
[O.T.] Legion of Honor for Jerry Lewis (5 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Norwegian" temperament?

"Norwegian" temperament?

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:53:46 -0500

36 lines

Re: "Norwegian" temperament?

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:14:54 +1100

44 lines

Re: "Norwegian" temperament?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:41:38 -0500

46 lines

Re: "Norwegian" temperament?

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:30:02 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

*** Amps.

*** Amps.

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:57:07 +0000

27 lines

Re: *** Amps.

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 23:48:15 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

19th century temperament

19th century temperament

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 08:38:43 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

2006 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina

2006 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina

Leopoldo Perez Robledo <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:32:55 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

5 1/2 octave kirckman

5 1/2 octave kirckman

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 13:14:33 +1100

13 lines

Re: 5 1/2 octave kirckman

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:35:57 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

A hot harpsichord........

A hot harpsichord........

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:09:05 -0500

20 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:46:39 -0500

39 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 17:57:51 +0100

36 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:12:03 -0500

53 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:03:53 -0500

70 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:27:00 -0500

60 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:42:06 +0400

39 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:49:17 -0500

21 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 14:30:31 -0500

20 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:41:05 -0600

28 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:12:05 -0500

20 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 20:00:06 -0600

23 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:44:57 -0500

27 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:45:41 -0600

33 lines

Re: A hot harpsichord........

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:18:12 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:34:15 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778

Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778

Regi Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 20:14:21 +0000

33 lines

Re: Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 21:25:30 -0000

27 lines

Re: Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778

Regi Walker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 22:25:06 +0000

48 lines

New Thread

Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778 / David Wright

Re: Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778 / David Wright

Gareth Morton <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 23:29:06 +0000

77 lines

Re: Adam Bayer Square Piano 1778 / David Wright

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:02:11 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

ADMINISTRATIVE - ALL READ

ADMINISTRATIVE - ALL READ

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 17:00:15 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

ADMINISTRATIVE -- ALL READ

ADMINISTRATIVE -- ALL READ

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:12:56 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

adress alan curtis anyone?

adress alan curtis anyone?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:40:37 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Altnickol 1744

Altnickol 1744

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:56:02 -0500

74 lines

New Thread

Another critic from hell?

Another critic from hell?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 18:49:02 -0600

54 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:21:39 -0000

38 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 05:37:44 -0600

28 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:59:55 -0500

54 lines

Another critic from hell?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:14:16 -0500

52 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:44:11 +0000

24 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:35:13 -0600

34 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:11:45 -0800

62 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:08:50 -0000

23 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 23:21:07 +0400

27 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:45:45 -0800

40 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 19:47:07 -0600

65 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 20:21:38 -0500

17 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:42:32 +0400

30 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 08:48:59 +0400

73 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:01:51 -0500

32 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 05:45:10 -0500

49 lines

Re: Another critic from hell?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

46 lines

New Thread

another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment

another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:29:52 -0500

124 lines

Re: another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 11:24:40 -0800

136 lines

Re: another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:43:18 -0500

26 lines

Re: another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:14:01 -0500

51 lines

Re: another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 01:04:03 +0100

46 lines

another easy circulating temp, emphasizing tasteful adjustment

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:36:26 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

apparel and JD Dulcken restoration

apparel and JD Dulcken restoration

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 10:08:14 -0800

26 lines

Re: apparel and JD Dulcken restoration

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:20:43 -0500

18 lines

Re: apparel and JD Dulcken restoration

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 05:36:13 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

audience

audience

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 15:56:32 -0500

47 lines

Re: audience

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 22:10:01 -0500

82 lines

Re: audience

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 21:01:15 -0500

44 lines

Re: audience

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:43:08 -0800

41 lines

Re: audience

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 02:31:35 -0800

51 lines

Re: audience

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 05:44:40 -0500

40 lines

Re: audience

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:35:11 -0800

41 lines

Re: audience

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:58:58 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

audience, forgot

Re: audience, forgot

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 06:04:42 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

australian WTC facsimiles

australian WTC facsimiles

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 09:20:03 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

AW: HPSCHD-L Digest - 7 Mar 2006 to 8 Mar 2006 - Special issue (#2006-81)

AW: HPSCHD-L Digest - 7 Mar 2006 to 8 Mar 2006 - Special issue (#2006-81)

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 10:19:52 +0100

68 lines

New Thread

Aye, there's the rub!

Aye, there's the rub!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 08:04:20 -0500

61 lines

Re: Aye, there's the rub!

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 17:38:25 +0100

25 lines

Re: Aye, there's the rub!

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:31:43 -0500

34 lines

Re: Aye, there's the rub!

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 13:46:12 -0500

27 lines

Re: Aye, there's the rub!

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:35:05 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Aye, there's the rub! drifting way off topic

Re: Aye, there's the rub! drifting way off topic

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:20:26 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Bach - Appoggiaturas

Bach - Appoggiaturas

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:57:53 +0100

53 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 16:43:05 -0600

21 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:18:50 -0500

43 lines

Bach - appoggiaturas

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 17:38:12 -0800

63 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 22:22:31 -0500

29 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:38:46 -0500

38 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:41:33 -0500

21 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:51:37 -0500

49 lines

Bach - Appoggiaturas

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:15:19 +0100

96 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 17:15:08 -0500

77 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:09:22 +0000

27 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 09:53:27 -0500

36 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:58:34 -0500

77 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:24:14 +0100

47 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:37:02 -0500

71 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:51:58 -0800

41 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 21:55:14 +0200

58 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:18:13 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Bach - Appoggiaturas, now development towards Beethoven

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas, now development towards Beethoven

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 16:36:26 -0500

63 lines

Re: Bach - Appoggiaturas, now development towards Beethoven

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:11:29 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:50:57 -0500

64 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:50:22 -0500

62 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:13:09 -0500

38 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:32:39 -0500

95 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 11:36:11 -0500

51 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:06:05 -0500

39 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:16:17 -0500

86 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:49:45 -0500

23 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 20:06:29 -0500

31 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 21:19:35 -0500

18 lines

Re: Bach - appoggiaturas/ornaments on the whole

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 22:37:07 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Bach and Marpurg, adn the impossibility to make systems out of embellishment practice

Bach and Marpurg, adn the impossibility to make systems out of embellishment practice

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 16:33:57 -0500

104 lines

Re: Bach and Marpurg, adn the impossibility to make systems out of embellishment practice

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:40:31 -0700

67 lines

Bach and Marpurg, adn the impossibility to make systems out of embellishment practice

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 13:41:27 +0200

53 lines

Re: Bach and Marpurg, adn the impossibility to make systems out of embellishment practice

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 09:12:46 -0500

51 lines

Re: Bach and Marpurg, adn the impossibility to make systems out of embellishment practice

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 11:41:37 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Bach bibliographical question

Bach bibliographical question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:36:17 -0800

40 lines

Re: Bach bibliographical question

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:41:18 -0500

30 lines

Re: Bach bibliographical question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:12:35 -0800

57 lines

Re: Bach bibliographical question

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:26:08 -0800

39 lines

Re: Bach bibliographical question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 06:23:33 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Bach needs our help!

Bach needs our help!

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:21:39 -0500

29 lines

Re: Bach needs our help!

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 13:58:01 -0500

37 lines

Re: Bach needs our help!

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:06:21 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Bach Tuning Website

Bach Tuning Website

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:36:55 +0200

23 lines

Re: Bach Tuning Website

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2006 14:07:28 -0700

110 lines

Re: Bach Tuning Website

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2006 16:49:43 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:59:06 -0500

24 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:31:28 -0500

49 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 09:36:17 -0500

43 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:16:39 +0100

57 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 10:34:40 -0500

25 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 08:04:32 -0800

64 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 11:58:12 -0500

124 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 13:21:11 -0500

40 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:53:49 -0500

41 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:28:19 +0100

78 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:12:14 -0500

50 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:14:29 -0500

81 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:21:28 -0500

33 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:46:06 -0500

20 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:28:43 +0100

56 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:51:52 -0500

35 lines

Re: Bach's "missing 2nd movement" in the Brandenburgs

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 00:55:47 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

bach's gottesfurcht

bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:54:32 +0100

26 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:18:31 -0500

62 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:55:19 -0500

27 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:07:11 -0500

66 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:34:47 EST

22 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:05:24 -0500

35 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:10:41 +0100

23 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:57:14 -0500

54 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:22:56 -0500

44 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:09:40 -0800

35 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 04:13:44 +0100

44 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 08:27:14 +0400

24 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 23:24:59 -0500

23 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Helen OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:08:12 +1100

30 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:00:05 -0500

102 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:13:57 +0400

55 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 14:58:45 -0500

24 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 21:51:08 +0100

24 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:16:19 -0500

24 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 23:16:52 +0100

22 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:13:39 -0500

18 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 17:23:37 -0500

41 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 01:14:58 +0100

33 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 20:46:43 -0500

41 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 18:29:36 -0800

34 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 05:45:03 +0200

51 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:40:54 +0400

40 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 00:37:33 -0500

65 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 13:03:05 +0200

44 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 06:25:23 -0500

30 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 10:57:36 -0500

152 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 11:27:07 -0500

45 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:05:51 -0800

21 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:19:06 +0400

29 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 20:56:21 -0800

45 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:05:28 -0500

51 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:01:22 +0200

49 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:51:30 -0500

59 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:58:51 -0600

57 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 03:00:24 +0200

46 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:17:26 +0400

66 lines

Re: bach's gottesfurcht

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 00:59:06 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

bach's gottesfurcht/options

Re: bach's gottesfurcht/options

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 07:47:12 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Bach/keys

Bach/keys

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:07:11 -0600

30 lines

Bach/keys

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:04:19 -0800

69 lines

Bach/keys

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:44:37 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Bach/keys Clavier-Uebungen I-III (and Goldberg-Variations)

Re: Bach/keys Clavier-Uebungen I-III (and Goldberg-Variations)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:59:18 +0100

176 lines

Re: Bach/keys Clavier-Uebungen I-III (and Goldberg-Variations)

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:03:35 -0600

28 lines

Re: Bach/keys Clavier-Uebungen I-III (and Goldberg-Variations)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:03:25 +0100

120 lines

Re: Bach/keys Clavier-Uebungen I-III (and Goldberg-Variations)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:20:44 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Bad BAD BAD

Bad BAD BAD

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 19:32:44 -0500

12 lines

Re: Bad BAD BAD

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 01:02:48 +0000

13 lines

Re: Bad BAD BAD

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:35:55 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:02:14 -0500

62 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 01:36:41 +0400

35 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:17:41 -0500

33 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 15:22:01 -0500

16 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:16:36 -0500

46 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 19:57:00 -0600

38 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:36:04 -0500

21 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:28:36 +0400

34 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:58:28 -0800

19 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:42:56 -0500

36 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:12:04 -0500

31 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:22:05 -0500

21 lines

Re: BBG V Improvisation, and comparison of the Brandenburgs

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 00:05:57 +0400

38 lines

New Thread

BBG V Improvisation?

BBG V Improvisation?

Philip Bayles <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:41:26 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

Beat counting and bean counting

Re: Beat counting and bean counting

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:49:37 +0400

36 lines

Re: Beat counting and bean counting

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 11:29:47 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

Belated comment Re: Another critic from hell?

Belated comment Re: Another critic from hell?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:10:29 -0600

43 lines

Re: Belated comment Re: Another critic from hell?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:23:26 -0800

20 lines

Re: Belated comment Re: Another critic from hell?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:15:04 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Belder Goldberg, Italian concerto, Stravinsky - was Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Belder Goldberg, Italian concerto, Stravinsky - was Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:15:06 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Bendeler, for Beginners

Bendeler, for Beginners

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 17:43:31 +0100

39 lines

Re: Bendeler, for Beginners

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:21:46 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Books

Books

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

16 lines

Re: Books

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 03:19:04 -0500

25 lines

Re: Books

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

33 lines

New Thread

Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:48:15 -0500

21 lines

Re: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:31:58 +0400

45 lines

Re: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 10:14:00 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Brad on Sunday mornings

Brad on Sunday mornings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:13:01 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Brad's problem

Brad's problem

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:19:34 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

British Clavichord Society Awards to Rodger and Lynne Mirrey

British Clavichord Society Awards to Rodger and Lynne Mirrey

Judith Wardman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:14:37 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Building a harpsichord in ONE weekend?

Building a harpsichord in ONE weekend?

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:00:39 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

burning harpsichords

Re: burning harpsichords

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 06:02:49 -0800

17 lines

Re: burning harpsichords

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:47:53 -0500

35 lines

Re: burning harpsichords

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:26:36 -0600

29 lines

Re: burning harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 09:30:43 +0400

24 lines

Re: burning harpsichords

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:13:09 -0800

28 lines

Re: burning harpsichords

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:23:10 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

c'chord kit botch giveaway

c'chord kit botch giveaway

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:37:31 -0500

44 lines

Re: c'chord kit botch giveaway

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 21:28:15 -0500

19 lines

Re: c'chord kit botch giveaway

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 22:14:13 -0500

26 lines

Re: c'chord kit botch giveaway

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 22:29:55 -0500

13 lines

Re: c'chord kit botch giveaway

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:37:48 +0400

39 lines

Re: c'chord kit botch giveaway

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 06:40:53 +0000

25 lines

Re: c'chord kit botch giveaway

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 08:00:45 -0500

21 lines

Re: c'chord kit botch giveaway

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:59:09 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

challis jacks

challis jacks

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:47:37 -0500

26 lines

Re: challis jacks

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:31:11 -0800

40 lines

Re: challis jacks

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:26:50 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

change hpschd-l [log in to unmask]

change hpschd-l [log in to unmask]

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:19:06 +0100

10 lines

New Thread

Circulating temperaments emphasizing foolproofness

Circulating temperaments emphasizing foolproofness

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:30:46 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

circulating temps with wide E-G#

circulating temps with wide E-G#

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:55:33 -0500

70 lines

circulating temps with wide E-G#

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 22:23:45 +0100

45 lines

Re: circulating temps with wide E-G#

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 19:11:55 -0700

57 lines

Re: circulating temps with wide E-G#

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 11:35:54 +0100

44 lines

circulating temps with wide E-G#

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:07:50 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

clavichords and h-list

clavichords and h-list

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 12:14:05 -0500

67 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:52:48 +0400

32 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:31:22 +0100

55 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:50:08 +0100

24 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

46 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 08:26:49 -0500

23 lines

clavichords and h-list

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 18:51:59 +0100

36 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:27:48 -0800

63 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 20:02:51 +0000

30 lines

clavichords and h-list

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 12:44:34 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

clavichords and h-list ( off topic issues)

Re: clavichords and h-list ( off topic issues)

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:10:38 -0500

25 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list ( off topic issues)

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 13:33:41 -0500

24 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list ( off topic issues)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:03:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: clavichords and h-list ( off topic issues)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 14:51:34 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Colin Tilney

Colin Tilney

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:52:12 -0500

11 lines

New Thread

Couperin ordre 23: Gondoles de Delos

Couperin ordre 23: Gondoles de Delos

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 17:01:03 -0500

34 lines

Re: Couperin ordre 23: Gondoles de Delos

Max Wheeler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 23:26:01 -0000

48 lines

Re: Couperin ordre 23: Gondoles de Delos

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 18:00:13 -0800

53 lines

Re: Couperin ordre 23: Gondoles de Delos

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 08:25:30 +0000

36 lines

New Thread

Creating the next generation of enthusiasts

Creating the next generation of enthusiasts

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 16:47:41 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

Dances with Wolves: etc.

Re: Dances with Wolves: etc.

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:34:58 +0100

77 lines

New Thread

Dances with Wolves: etc. / Maihingen [...]

Re: Dances with Wolves: etc. / Maihingen [...]

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:59:05 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals

Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:00:32 +0100

262 lines

Re: Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:01:00 -0800

208 lines

Re: Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:43:50 -0500

26 lines

Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 18:56:45 +0100

46 lines

Re: Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:13:08 +0100

37 lines

Dances with Wolves: Ibo Ortgies's Alternative Tuning Meantone (1/4 s.c.) with only Just Intervals

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 16:01:55 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

David Cates's French Suites CDs on sale

David Cates's French Suites CDs on sale

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:41:19 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

Delete function for email reading programs

Delete function for email reading programs

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:15:44 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

Desert island recordings

Desert island recordings

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:05:19 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

Dictionaries. Was Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Dictionaries. Was Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 11:56:56 -0000

35 lines

Re: Dictionaries. Was Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 18:35:52 +0400

54 lines

New Thread

Dictionaries. Was: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Re: Dictionaries. Was: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:41:36 +0100

43 lines

Re: Dictionaries. Was: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:03:01 +0400

39 lines

Re: Dictionaries. Was: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 21:35:45 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

discoveries..... found earlier

Re: discoveries..... found earlier

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 02:51:18 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:24:28 -0500

307 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:53:35 -0500

56 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 17:56:05 -0500

19 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:23:59 -0500

17 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 05:27:12 +0200

26 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:26:05 -0700

115 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 11:05:16 -0000

36 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:34:02 +0100

53 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:24:32 +0400

46 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 18:18:21 -0000

67 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:25:14 +0100

204 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:59:27 -0500

25 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:18:41 +0100

16 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 16:06:32 -0500

19 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 17:35:46 -0500

135 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Thomas Glück <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 00:48:04 +0100

29 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:50:36 -0500

61 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 13:44:07 +0100

12 lines

discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 19:18:38 +0100

52 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 20:32:38 -0700

36 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 19:52:13 -0800

56 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 06:38:41 +0100

18 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:39:07 +0400

44 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 06:41:12 +0100

12 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 09:40:40 +0100

21 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 18:09:41 +0400

33 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:46:57 -0700

176 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 10:17:16 -0800

229 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:32:49 -0700

52 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 11:42:23 -0800

28 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:50:08 -0700

36 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:31:03 +0100

80 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles ....

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:50:06 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 01:04:40 +0100

88 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 23:50:12 -0500

126 lines

New Thread

discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament were already found earlier

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament were already found earlier

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 06:35:55 -0800

173 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament were already found earlier

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:54:15 -0500

53 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament were already found earlier

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:21:40 -0500

17 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament were already found earlier

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 00:17:38 +0100

39 lines

Re: discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament were already found earlier

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:18:08 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

doodle

doodle

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 14:46:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: doodle

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:13:29 +0100

25 lines

Re: doodle

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:37:28 -0500

61 lines

Re: doodle

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:30:59 +0100

35 lines

Re: doodle

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:06:42 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Eagle feathers?

Re: Eagle feathers?

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 10:51:05 EST

25 lines

New Thread

Early music events in Paris and Prague?

Early music events in Paris and Prague?

Stephen Rumpf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 08:16:28 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Easy septimal mod meantone II

Easy septimal mod meantone II

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 18:55:38 +0100

42 lines

Re: Easy septimal mod meantone II

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 11:42:44 -0800

104 lines

Re: Easy septimal mod meantone II

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 21:39:11 +0100

91 lines

New Thread

Easy septimal modified meantone

Easy septimal modified meantone

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:49:22 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

Egarr Review

Egarr Review

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 11:25:55 -0500

11 lines

New Thread

Egarr' instruments

Egarr' instruments

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 10:43:12 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

Fictional reference to one of our own. . .

Fictional reference to one of our own. . .

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:38:41 -0500

22 lines

Re: Fictional reference to one of our own. . .

Jane Haddam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:44:04 EST

18 lines

Re: Fictional reference to one of our own. . .

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:01:20 -0500

25 lines

Re: Fictional reference to one of our own. . .

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 17:44:15 +0000

30 lines

Re: Fictional reference to one of our own. . .

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 10:00:41 +0400

41 lines

Re: Fictional reference to one of our own. . .

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 07:41:10 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

French Suites

French Suites

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:17:13 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach)

fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 09:39:16 -0500

41 lines

Re: fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 14:08:53 -0500

56 lines

fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 21:56:13 +0100

33 lines

Re: fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 16:15:06 -0500

62 lines

Re: fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach)

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:44:41 -0500

19 lines

Re: fretting conflicts in WTC (was Ordinaire meets Bach)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:13:44 -0500

76 lines

New Thread

Friedrich Suppig's Diagrammatic Tunings

Friedrich Suppig's Diagrammatic Tunings

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Mar 2006 17:22:17 +0200

19 lines

New Thread

Fw: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Fw: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:53:48 -0500

22 lines

Fw: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 18:59:15 -0500

27 lines

Re: Fw: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 07:38:19 +0400

49 lines

Re: Fw: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Stephen Rumpf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:39:05 -0500

15 lines

Re: Fw: Boston performance by Bach Collegium Japan

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 00:05:31 +0400

28 lines

New Thread

FW: Listserv Web Interface Downtime - Update

FW: Listserv Web Interface Downtime - Update

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:26:26 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

FW: Yale Institute of Sacred Music

FW: Yale Institute of Sacred Music

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 12:02:00 -0600

66 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Europe Declares Pipe Organs Health Hazards

Fwd: Europe Declares Pipe Organs Health Hazards

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 01:30:01 EST

132 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Schiller Institute and C=256Hz ? (typos corrected)

Fwd: Schiller Institute and C=256Hz ? (typos corrected)

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 17:33:48 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle

GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 09:07:01 -0800

34 lines

Re: GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 13:22:30 -0500

18 lines

Re: GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 15:46:12 -0500

33 lines

Re: GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:10:22 -0500

34 lines

Re: GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 23:06:59 -0500

45 lines

Re: GALLA EVENT-EGARR_GOLDBERG inSeattle

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:00:35 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

George Malcolm/Rameau

George Malcolm/Rameau

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:22:00 -0600

23 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:07:06 -0500

52 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:14:10 -0500

17 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:38:15 -0800

62 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 01:57:10 -0500

68 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:54:09 -0800

83 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 10:40:30 -0500

14 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:04:53 -0800

27 lines

Re: George Malcolm/Rameau

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:06:00 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Going to the dogs (was: musical ornithology)

Going to the dogs (was: musical ornithology)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 01:52:40 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Goldbergs to be Played in Pittsburgh

Goldbergs to be Played in Pittsburgh

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 05:28:55 -0500

22 lines

Re: Goldbergs to be Played in Pittsburgh

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:22:57 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Handel's (Händel's) or Mozart's n ose?

Handel's (Händel's) or Mozart's n ose?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:32:08 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

handel's intellectual day, was bach's gottesfurcht

handel's intellectual day, was bach's gottesfurcht

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 13:44:35 +0100

39 lines

Re: handel's intellectual day, was bach's gottesfurcht

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 10:54:06 -0500

38 lines

Re: handel's intellectual day, was bach's gottesfurcht

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 11:28:56 -0500

51 lines

Re: handel's intellectual day, was bach's gottesfurcht

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 16:17:20 -0500

29 lines

Re: handel's intellectual day, was bach's gottesfurcht

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:52:55 -0800

50 lines

New Thread

Handel/Händel in Haarlem

Re: Handel/Händel in Haarlem

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:10:48 +0100

98 lines

Re: Handel/Händel in Haarlem

Dean <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:22:57 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord builders

Harpsichord builders

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 07:00:03 +0000

21 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord info sought

Harpsichord info sought

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 15:31:04 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:11:25 -0500

14 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:51:55 +0400

27 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:13:37 -0500

36 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:58:38 -0800

16 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 22:10:19 +0100

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:27:50 -0600

36 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:34:22 -0600

24 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 19:50:10 -0600

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 21:09:49 -0600

33 lines

Re: Harpsichord playing policemen - more common than you think

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 23:08:46 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord program - help

Harpsichord program - help

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 01:23:56 -0500

43 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

54 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:22:02 -0600

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:30:28 -0500

52 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:35:18 -0500

53 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:40:42 -0800

46 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 05:53:35 -0800

50 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

William C. Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:25:09 -0500

51 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:39:07 EST

37 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:07:58 -0500

15 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 19:18:14 +0400

64 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 10:42:11 -0500

31 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:55:28 -0700

38 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:58:34 -0500

48 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:09:31 +0000

46 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:07:26 -0700

83 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 00:47:41 -0500

18 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 23:35:26 -0800

47 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 09:44:59 -0800

31 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 23:01:43 +0400

50 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:14:15 -0800

41 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:22:45 -0800

79 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

55 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 06:19:46 -0500

84 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 12:23:11 +0100

21 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 19:51:12 +0400

35 lines

Re: Harpsichord program - help

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 11:10:49 -0500

115 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:25:17 -0800

41 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:31:27 -0800

77 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:36:14 -0800

77 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 07:13:39 -0500

65 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 05:56:19 -0800

21 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:28:59 -0600

27 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:44:21 -0500

29 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:37:31 -0500

24 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 12:46:58 -0500

70 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 00:16:28 +0400

43 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 01:44:57 +0200

21 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 02:07:17 +0200

37 lines

harpsichord wardrobe

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 00:49:39 +0100

19 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 03:57:38 +0400

38 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 02:37:55 +0200

18 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:22:38 -0500

50 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 16:26:33 -0800

102 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 03:05:40 +0200

20 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 19:38:10 -0500

19 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:01:24 -0500

27 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 03:35:21 +0200

38 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:07:08 -0500

23 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:14:09 -0500

30 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 03:52:10 +0200

28 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:43:46 -0500

38 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:56:11 -0500

32 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:31:43 -0600

54 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 20:39:57 -0600

36 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 05:48:11 +0200

32 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:24:33 -0500

46 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 06:37:49 +0200

30 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 23:34:46 -0500

31 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Robert C L Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 00:24:08 -0500

17 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:42:24 +0400

30 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 08:44:04 +0100

24 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:45:33 +0100

20 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:29:56 +0000

20 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:32:23 +0000

12 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 07:33:51 +0000

19 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:57:17 +0200

28 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 18:44:20 -0500

47 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:50:25 -0500

15 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:18:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 10:36:04 -0500

56 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 15:39:47 +0000

27 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:11:01 +0200

19 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 09:11:29 -0800

57 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:57:44 +0400

30 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:58:21 -0500

43 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:18:19 -0800

23 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 15:09:16 +1000

17 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 00:35:54 -0500

33 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 04:58:32 -0800

56 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:26:08 +0400

34 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:59:14 -0500

49 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 12:43:54 -0500

17 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:52:44 +0000

37 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 22:55:40 -0500

63 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:57:53 +0000

112 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:05:21 -0600

51 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 15:43:28 -0500

64 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 16:51:42 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe (bis)

Re: harpsichord wardrobe (bis)

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:27:40 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe - dressage

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - dressage

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:25:14 -0600

44 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - dressage

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 08:07:56 +0400

56 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - dressage

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 22:54:41 -0600

63 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - dressage

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 19:18:51 +0400

31 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - dressage

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 12:57:05 -0500

35 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - dressage

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 08:50:16 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe - gilet

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - gilet

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 04:17:48 +0200

35 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - gilet

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 06:08:14 -0500

29 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - gilet

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:26:14 +0000

17 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - gilet

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:19:07 +0200

71 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - gilet

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 23:48:52 +0400

37 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt

harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 04:21:43 +0200

29 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 21:22:39 -0500

52 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 19:49:17 -0700

45 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 13:24:38 +0000

17 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 14:38:56 +0100

20 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 02:33:31 +0200

35 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:42:14 -0500

48 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 21:45:04 -0500

50 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 05:23:00 +0200

49 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 07:30:49 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie, the dictionary

harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie, the dictionary

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:43:12 +0200

36 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie, the dictionary

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 17:51:25 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie, the face

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the bow tie, the face

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 16:34:06 +0200

48 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the tie

Re: harpsichord wardrobe - the shirt, the tie

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 10:28:46 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe, for Michael Smith

Re: harpsichord wardrobe, for Michael Smith

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 04:59:32 +0200

22 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe, for Michael Smith

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 22:15:09 -0500

25 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe, for Michael Smith

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 14:25:13 +1000

41 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe, for Michael Smith

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Mar 2006 23:36:14 -0500

26 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe, for Michael Smith

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 04:13:55 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord with soft and loud

Harpsichord with soft and loud

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

13 lines

Re: Harpsichord with soft and loud

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:57:46 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

Haurpsichord burning video, press releases and other crap

Haurpsichord burning video, press releases and other crap

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:28:42 -0500

19 lines

Re: Haurpsichord burning video, press releases and other crap

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:40:55 -0800

29 lines

Re: Haurpsichord burning video, press releases and other crap

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 15:09:00 -0600

36 lines

Re: Haurpsichord burning video, press releases and other crap

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:30:10 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

He's alive

Re: He's alive

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 00:43:44 -0800

108 lines

New Thread

Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641

Re: Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:44:58 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Hel mstadt Manuscript

Re: Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Hel mstadt Manuscript

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:01:04 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript

Re: Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:50:43 -0500

32 lines

Re: Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 18:21:58 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript

Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 – Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 10:23:39 +0100

65 lines

New Thread

Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript

Re: Helmstedter Tabulatur 1641 Re: The Helmstadt Manuscript

Nick Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 22:04:42 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Help! Beethoven conversation books vol 9

Help! Beethoven conversation books vol 9

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 15:04:16 -0500

26 lines

Re: Help! Beethoven conversation books vol 9

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 01:30:18 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Archives -- March 2006 (#804)

HPSCHD-L Archives -- March 2006 (#804)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:43:44 +0100

46 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Archives -- March 2006 (#804)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:26:55 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 Mar 2006 to 27 Mar 2006 (#2006-107)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 Mar 2006 to 27 Mar 2006 (#2006-107)

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 09:19:55 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Hubbard Stein was wardrobe

Hubbard Stein was wardrobe

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 16:04:55 +1000

44 lines

Re: Hubbard Stein was wardrobe

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 11:36:14 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 16:39:06 -0500

102 lines

Re: Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:42:59 +0100

38 lines

Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 13:39:56 +0100

29 lines

Re: Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 08:11:40 -0500

29 lines

Re: Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 08:37:56 -0500

49 lines

Re: Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:53:49 +0000

39 lines

Re: Hummel's quick and dirty way. Practical historical temperaments

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 15:58:11 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Hypothetical Histories (was some relevant squiggles)

Hypothetical Histories (was some relevant squiggles)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 17:31:45 +0100

81 lines

Re: Hypothetical Histories (was some relevant squiggles)

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:38:32 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

In need of Trash

In need of Trash

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 16:00:05 -0600

25 lines

Re: In need of Trash

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:23:26 -0500

45 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:47:07 +0400

44 lines

Re: In need of Trash

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 17:55:24 -0500

29 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 19:03:17 -0500

55 lines

Re: In need of Trash

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 07:27:04 +0100

26 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 02:46:30 -0500

16 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 00:00:00 GMT

43 lines

Re: In need of Trash

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:03:20 EST

22 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 09:47:04 +0000

32 lines

Re: In need of Trash

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 10:22:39 -0500

36 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 17:39:05 +0100

24 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 07:51:01 +0000

30 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 19:11:32 +0400

21 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Meg Cotner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 11:15:14 -0500

41 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:13:59 -0500

13 lines

Re: In need of Trash

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 15:30:42 -0800

16 lines

Re: In need of Trash

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 22:24:10 -0600

21 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:57:23 +0400

32 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 07:58:05 +0000

37 lines

Re: In need of Trash

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 08:45:46 -0600

29 lines

Re: In need of Trash

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 09:06:44 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

In search of a Bach Temperament

In search of a Bach Temperament

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:30:58 -0500

134 lines

New Thread

Info about an Old Neupert Harpsichord

Info about an Old Neupert Harpsichord

Jim White <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:08:00 -0500

34 lines

Re: Info about an Old Neupert Harpsichord

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 18:30:01 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

ink corrosion websites - Bach- and not-Bach-related

ink corrosion websites - Bach- and not-Bach-related

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:33:53 +0100

87 lines

New Thread

Interesting Concert/Event in Kansas

Interesting Concert/Event in Kansas

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 08:32:53 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Inverno: Snow and Rain

Re: Inverno: Snow and Rain

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 06:40:22 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Is this not a great list? . . .

Is this not a great list? . . .

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 09:54:19 +0400

63 lines

Re: Is this not a great list? . . .

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 07:21:40 -0500

90 lines

Re: Is this not a great list? . . .

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 15:43:41 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

is this really going to work? (SCUSI)

is this really going to work? (SCUSI)

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:16:16 +0100

10 lines

Re: is this really going to work? (SCUSI)

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Mar 2006 00:19:39 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Juillard Gift

Juillard Gift

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:17:59 +0100

20 lines

Re: Juillard Gift

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 09:29:13 -0500

28 lines

Re: Juillard Gift

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 10:41:45 -0500

24 lines

Re: Juillard Gift

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 17:44:51 +0100

33 lines

Re: Juillard Gift

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 13:48:47 -0500

46 lines

Re: Juillard Gift

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 14:19:24 -0500

19 lines

Re: Juillard Gift

lancemyers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 11:44:15 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:07:33 -0800

22 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 11:12:44 -0800

34 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 18:29:30 -0500

37 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:45:10 -0500

27 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 11:38:26 +0100

59 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 04:15:26 -0800

40 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Mar 2006 15:10:50 +0100

46 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 06:20:33 +0000

65 lines

Re: Keyboard instruments in Vienna i/t 2nd half of the 18th century?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Mar 2006 02:40:25 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Leon Berben WTC recording

Leon Berben WTC recording

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 15:33:43 -0600

46 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:19:57 -0800

31 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 14:25:47 -0800

26 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 19:04:12 -0500

26 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:01:28 -0600

38 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 21:05:47 -0600

26 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:52:36 +0100

44 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 08:41:38 -0600

21 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 12:33:51 -0500

34 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 22:50:44 -0800

55 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 05:41:34 -0600

30 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 13:16:22 +0000

36 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 19:48:14 -0500

54 lines

Re: Leon Berben WTC recording

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 02:13:56 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

Lesson plans

Lesson plans

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 09:26:10 -0500

47 lines

Re: Lesson plans

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:34:01 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

lindley was buzzing

Re: lindley was buzzing

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 01:51:49 -0800

53 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 08:27:51 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Listserv Web Interface Downtime - Today March 7 (fwd)

Listserv Web Interface Downtime - Today March 7 (fwd)

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 08:49:06 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

long pedal points on hpsi

long pedal points on hpsi

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Mar 2006 16:10:48 -0500

23 lines

Re: long pedal points on hpsi

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 13:54:12 EST

31 lines

Re: long pedal points on hpsi

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:46:57 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

lutherie radio program on Internet

lutherie radio program on Internet

Leopoldo Perez Robledo <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:42:50 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Maendler-Schramm for sale

Maendler-Schramm for sale

Stephen Rumpf <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 23:46:00 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Maihingen, once again, and other Organ Tuning related stuff

Maihingen, once again, and other Organ Tuning related stuff

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 11:00:23 +0100

185 lines

New Thread

Malcolm

Malcolm

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Mar 2006 16:37:00 -0600

30 lines

Re: Malcolm

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 09:06:14 +0400

24 lines

Re: Malcolm

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 07:28:26 -0500

22 lines

Re: Malcolm

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 09:03:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: Malcolm

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 19:28:52 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

malcolm/wanda

malcolm/wanda

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Mar 2006 10:22:54 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

March 21, 1685

March 21, 1685

Wanda Landowska KotF <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:31:05 EST

12 lines

New Thread

Mattheson on Accent

Mattheson on Accent

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 23:41:49 +0200

59 lines

Re: Mattheson on Accent

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:56:45 EST

14 lines

Re: Mattheson on Accent

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Mar 2006 11:27:26 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

meantone 101

meantone 101

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Mar 2006 12:19:27 -0500

337 lines

New Thread

Metrical value vs. temporal value

Metrical value vs. temporal value

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 15:39:53 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

Modern concert practice tale

Modern concert practice tale

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 12:19:35 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Motto Choices WAS bach's gottesfurcht/options

Motto Choices WAS bach's gottesfurcht/options

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 08:26:51 -0500

57 lines

Re: Motto Choices WAS bach's gottesfurcht/options

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:03:11 -0500

30 lines

Re: Motto Choices WAS bach's gottesfurcht/options

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Mar 2006 16:11:21 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Mozart B-flat sonata

Mozart B-flat sonata

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 11:47:09 -0800

16 lines

Re: Mozart B-flat sonata

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 16:27:45 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Mozart B-flat sonata K. 498a

Re: Mozart B-flat sonata K. 498a

Martha Bishop <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 07:29:41 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Mozart sonata for two

Re: Mozart sonata for two

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 20:08:01 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith

Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 14:43:57 -0500

20 lines

Re: Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 21:06:38 +0000

35 lines

Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Mar 2006 13:23:03 -0500

41 lines

Re: Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 04:01:30 -0500

20 lines

Re: Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 10:48:33 -0500

37 lines

Re: Mozart sonata for two, question for Judith

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Mar 2006 11:40:30 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Sandra Mangsen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 11:50:14 -0500

115 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:11:03 -0500

28 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Mar 2006 22:33:52 -0500

30 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:46:58 +0100

30 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Sara Churchill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 03:55:19 -0500

40 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 04:15:55 -0500

74 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 05:21:29 -0500

45 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:35:38 +0100

46 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 07:18:12 -0500

24 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:26:32 -0500

73 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Sara Churchill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 09:22:00 -0500

58 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 14:41:23 -0500

28 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:04:46 -0500

41 lines

Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 15:19:57 +0100

18 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Sara Churchill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:27:52 -0500

31 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Mar 2006 23:40:40 -0800

36 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 07:45:20 -0500

38 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Sara Churchill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:40:14 -0500

59 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Sara Churchill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 08:46:51 -0500

54 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Helen OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 09:45:40 +1100

61 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 18:19:50 -0500

77 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Helen OBrien <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 10:59:58 +1100

86 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:07:31 -0800

48 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:15:28 -0800

92 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Mar 2006 22:52:00 -0800

19 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:01:04 -0500

38 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:35:06 -0500

47 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:18:09 +0100

28 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448 for 2

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 09:27:32 +0400

40 lines

New Thread

Mozart sonata K.448, Bach, and conceit

Re: Mozart sonata K.448, Bach, and conceit

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 15:49:39 -0500

55 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448, Bach, and conceit

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 22:14:57 +0100

33 lines

Re: Mozart sonata K.448, Bach, and conceit

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Mar 2006 12:11:52 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

Mssage for S. Rumpf

Mssage for S. Rumpf

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Mar 2006 20:59:21 -0500

27 lines

Re: Mssage for S. Rumpf

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Mar 2006 07:14:30 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

musical ornithology

musical ornithology

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:31:44 -0500

33 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:28:57 -0500

23 lines

Re: musical ornithology

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:48:31 -0500

46 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:49:10 -0500

23 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 15:57:44 -0500

12 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 22:38:15 +0100

27 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Garfinkel, Beth Diane <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 21:29:29 -0500

27 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 29 Mar 2006 19:41:15 -0800

38 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 06:28:50 -0500

43 lines

Re: musical ornithology

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 30 Mar 2006 10:31:52 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

My Harpsi-pad on the news

My Harpsi-pad on the news

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 21:29:38 -0500

19 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Mar 2006 20:09:21 -0700

26 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:43:01 +0400

41 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 07:58:58 +0000

30 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 12:37:53 +0000

37 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

lancemyers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 05:56:01 -0800

32 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:17:50 -0500

91 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 09:26:26 -0700

44 lines

Re: My Harpsi-pad on the news

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Mar 2006 20:53:21 +0400

50 lines

New Thread

my harpsichord on the web

my harpsichord on the web

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 16:18:49 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

New Clavichord

New Clavichord

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 16:01:14 -0800

32 lines

Re: New Clavichord

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Mar 2006 20:19:29 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

New EU proposal could limit what can be used in organ pipes

New EU proposal could limit what can be used in organ pipes

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 02:09:56 -0500

35 lines

Re: New EU proposal could limit what can be used in organ pipes

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 07:45:10 +0000

18 lines

Re: New EU proposal could limit what can be used in organ pipes

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Mar 2006 10:44:42 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

New on website

New on website

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 23:26:50 -0600

10 lines

Re: New on website

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:16:33 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

New topic! New builders?

New topic! New builders?

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 10:51:01 -0500

20 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 14:08:46 -0500

35 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:13:00 -0500

35 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 20:37:20 +0000

13 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:16:49 EST

50 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 16:50:02 -0500

42 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 15:29:38 -0600

16 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:19:25 -0500

35 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 04:21:41 +0400

27 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 11:20:15 +1000

64 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 17:11:05 -0800

90 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:43:33 +0000

21 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 21:58:07 -0500

19 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Mar 2006 22:09:49 +0000

34 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:10:59 +0400

37 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:13:25 +1000

58 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:02:54 +0100

17 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 16:24:20 +0000

30 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 17:54:36 +0100

20 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 09:01:47 -0800

27 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 12:04:31 -0500

36 lines

Re: New topic! New builders?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Mar 2006 19:10:35 +0100

60 lines

New Thread

NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 21:52:49 -0500

15 lines

Re: NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:02:46 -0500

30 lines

Re: NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:22:59 -0500

61 lines

Re: NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

Ian Robertson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Mar 2006 22:34:08 -0500

83 lines

Re: NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 01:53:06 -0800

28 lines

Re: NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

Daniel Lindblom <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Mar 2006 09:48:00 EST

42 lines

Re: NY Times Review of Egarr Concert

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2006 16:57:34 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

NY Times Review of Egarr Concert; 100 times too old?

Re: NY Times Review of Egarr Concert; 100 times too old?

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>