LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Far out keys" (12 messages)
"Far out keys" - dominants of minor keys (2 messages)
"Ideal" Ambience (25 messages)
(Semitone) transposing keyboards (14 messages)
***Re: lindley was buzzing--OT: Jerry Lewis (1 message)
1/12 PC assumption in the Lehman variant (was Re: Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning?) (1 message)
2 humble woods was (Semitone) transposing keyboards (1 message)
555+ Scarlatti sonatas? (3 messages)
888 (4 messages)
888 and voicing levels (1 message)
<No subject> (1 message)
A Bach breakfast! (8 messages)
A kinder, gentler ... variation (2 messages)
A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation (8 messages)
A kinder, gentler, MODIFIED Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script essay (3 messages)
A kinder, gentler...ah I was wrong there (2 messages)
A kinder, gentler...what I will play (2 messages)
a tuning sublist? (11 messages)
Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord (8 messages)
Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord, now organ (1 message)
Acoustics and major seventeenths, was a=440 (2 messages)
Administrative - All Read (2 messages)
Administrative - confidential (2 messages)
Administrative -- one more thing (1 message)
All Your Harpsichords Are Belong To Us (5 messages)
ambiance (2 messages)
Angela Hewitt AGAIN (7 messages)
Apology (1 message)
appropriate adhesives and "flimsy lids" (3 messages)
archives (was Steelers Won) (1 message)
Aristoxenos in Mattheson about acoustical problematic wide overtempered 5ths, was Re: Tuned Bach really an ugly wolf A#-->F? (1 message)
Armand-Louis Couperin in Nebraska tomorrow (4 messages)
Bach Clavichord (1 message)
Bach temperamet in recital. or: Tuned Bach really an ugly wolf A#-->F? (1 message)
Bach tempramet in recital (1 message)
Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz (14 messages)
Beat counting and bean counting (6 messages)
Bending (5 messages)
Bending oak planks in eighteenth-century England (1 message)
Bizzi (2 messages)
Bone key tops (1 message)
Boring jacks!!! (4 messages)
broadwood grand for Thom (1 message)
Broadwood Link (1 message)
Broadwood piano for sale (1 message)
Broadwood pianos (8 messages)
Broadwoods on recordings (1 message)
Buenos Aires (2 messages)
buzzing hrpscd (2 messages)
Care with titles of subjects (1 message)
chaconne today (3 messages)
circulating temp with a wide 5th in it... (3 messages)
Completely off topic: harpsichords (3 messages)
Creative organology (8 messages)
Damper cloth was Nodding off (3 messages)
Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir) (10 messages)
Directory (1 message)
discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament (1 message)
Dover was Italian Virginal (1 message)
drawings (3 messages)
Dulken repertoire (1 message)
e-bay offering (6 messages)
Eagle feathers? (3 messages)
Early Broadwoods: was Strike points...... (1 message)
eau de Bizzi (2 messages)
eclecticism, was English harpsichords (1 message)
End of spoofing once and for all (1 message)
English harpsichords (24 messages)
English harpsichords again (5 messages)
English harpsichords also becomes fir (1 message)
English harpsichords/pix submitals (2 messages)
fakery on the list (1 message)
Festival of Flanders, 2006 (1 message)
fish or fowl (5 messages)
fishy was Flimsy (1 message)
Flimsy lid - cause for concern ? (2 messages)
Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings (29 messages)
Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition (7 messages)
Fw: double your wiki's space (harpsichords) (1 message)
Fw: Re: a tuning sublist? (1 message)
Gabfest in Paris-March (1 message)
Goldberg variations? (2 messages)
gpg signing (was: [HPSCHD-L] testing phoneyness) (1 message)
hammerfluegel photo site (1 message)
Handel Mattheson question (1 message)
Harpsichord Concert 2/12/2006 -- Topeka, KS (1 message)
harpsichord freight (2 messages)
harpsichord wardrobe (22 messages)
He's alive (10 messages)
horse chestnut (1 message)
How the spofer does it (7 messages)
how to add excitement to a concert (5 messages)
Ideal Ambience becomes fir (17 messages)
inexplicable craze (1 message)
Interesting digital harpsichord at Germany eBay (2 messages)
Intruder alert (1 message)
irritating vs active (1 message)
It's NOT just in quotes, David! (9 messages)
Italian Virginal Suggestions Request (11 messages)
J.S. Bachs tunings group at yahoo, was Re: fractions of comma (1 message)
jacck tongues (3 messages)
jack tongues (5 messages)
jacks again (10 messages)
Just got my first harpsichord... (6 messages)
Kendrick Perala, R.I.P. (1 message)
Koopman (2 messages)
Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry (7 messages)
Later Trost-Tabelle (1 message)
Lego Harpsichord (2 messages)
lindley was buzzing (20 messages)
List of Composers-English Harpsichords. (18 messages)
little square (3 messages)
Looking for a harpsichord (2 messages)
Louis Armand Couperin (3 messages)
Magritte's harpsichord (Was: Intruder alert!) (1 message)
Maihingen (1 message)
Maihingen again (6 messages)
Makers Harpsichord and Fortepiano (1 message)
Mark Stevenson (2 messages)
Meantone vs. ET (2 messages)
Michaelangelo Rossi recordings (10 messages)
More jacks (1 message)
More rossi (1 message)
More Rousset froberger Couchet HMA1951372 (1 message)
more spoofing... (10 messages)
more varia (1 message)
Moving a harpsichord from US to Europe: any advice? (3 messages)
Mozart K608 (1 message)
Mozart Piano (15 messages)
Mozart Piano 31 (3 messages)
mozart tuning (6 messages)
mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz (11 messages)
Mozart's keyboards (4 messages)
My first harpsichord -4' dampers (3 messages)
Myrrh.... (3 messages)
naked major 17ths in Bach (1 message)
Nanette Streicher project forte piano available (1 message)
New car smell (5 messages)
New Mexico concert (4 messages)
Nodding off (1 message)
nose rub was leg pull was it's not just... (1 message)
oak was Squishing bentsides (6 messages)
old sparky (1 message)
organs again sorry (1 message)
OT **** [HPSCHD-L] Speak no Evil (1 message)
OT--Re: How the spofer does it (4 messages)
OT: j. lewis and bottom wax. (1 message)
Pbwiki Problems (1 message)
Performance Practice Review: call for submissions (1 message)
phoney identity (2 messages)
Photo site email link broken ? (6 messages)
Plucked keyboard at Olympics (5 messages)
positiv (1 message)
possible approach to mozart tuning (2 messages)
Ravens, was Re: To oil or not to oil? (1 message)
re the fakes! (1 message)
re. English harpsichords (21 messages)
re. English harpsichords - and photos (1 message)
re. Veneer was English harpsichords (2 messages)
Recital and a question (1 message)
registration of double pluck (1 message)
Reid Byers (1 message)
replacement Clavichord strings 1956 Goble (1 message)
Request for y'r drawings (1 message)
Reviewers needed (1 message)
roasted composer (1 message)
Ruckers numbers (1 message)
ruckers scaling (1 message)
Rutkowski and Robinette (3 messages)
sap ID was 1/12 PC assumption in the Lehman variant (was Re: Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning?) (2 messages)
Speak no Evil (8 messages)
Spoofing and e-mail ease (1 message)
square piano tuning (4 messages)
Squishing bentsides (23 messages)
Steelers won! (4 messages)
Strike points on Broadwoods, an example (1 message)
Strike points, and a p.s. on fake postings (2 messages)
Strike points: % wrong tool for the job (7 messages)
subjected, was harpsichord wardrobe (2 messages)
Sunday Feb. 12, Savannah, GA program (1 message)
surface treatments (1 message)
Sweelinck edition (3 messages)
testing phoneyness (5 messages)
That's *O*T (Was: Strike points, and a p.s. on fake postings) (1 message)
the agony and the ecstasy, part 2: the agony (2 messages)
The Johann Sebsatian Bach Code (on the silent Rosetta stone, of course): Squiggles and Speculation (1 message)
The WWKB has moved (1 message)
To Canadian or not to Canadian? (2 messages)
to drill or not to drill ? (tuning pins) (1 message)
To oil or not to oil? (19 messages)
Top treble 4fts (5 messages)
Trabaci (4 messages)
Translation of the1999 paper on the WTC squiggels, Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation (2 messages)
Tuned Bach really an ugly wolf A#-->F? (18 messages)
TV, was lindley was buzzing (3 messages)
TV, was lindley was buzzing ****** (1 message)
upcoming travel, have tools will work! (1 message)
varia (4 messages)
verdigris and ice; not the end of the world yet, alas (10 messages)
wax (1 message)
Weissenfels correction 5ths & 3rds diagramm (1 message)
Weissenfels nonsense (9 messages)
Weissenfels text (long) (1 message)
Weissenfels text .... analysis of stringlengths (1 message)
What do you wear when you build a harpsichord? (3 messages)
Where's Nick? (2 messages)
Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning? (1 message)
Willow Tree will you sing (6 messages)
Wire - was Re: Handel Mattheson question (1 message)
wood talk (1 message)
Your desert island disc (20 messages)
your favour-rite glue (3 messages)
your mail (1 message)
Zach wants to talk to you using Google Talk (1 message)
[[log in to unmask]: Re: English harpsichords] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Far out keys"

"Far out keys"

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 23:52:59 -0600

43 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 01:40:15 -0500

39 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:17:13 -0500

35 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:59:54 -0600

54 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:05:15 -0500

73 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 13:38:40 -0500

19 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 23:50:54 +0100

90 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:31:36 -0500

75 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:41:20 +0100

62 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:56:52 -0500

34 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:16:54 -0800

45 lines

Re: "Far out keys"

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:34:32 +0400

38 lines

New Thread

"Far out keys" - dominants of minor keys

"Far out keys" - dominants of minor keys

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:10:08 -0500

47 lines

Re: "Far out keys" - dominants of minor keys

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 02:44:39 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

"Ideal" Ambience

"Ideal" Ambience

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:55:34 -0600

33 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:07:37 -0600

90 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:01:55 -0500

23 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:54:40 -0500

47 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 05:09:35 -0500

64 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 05:47:38 -0500

94 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:20:39 -0500

32 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:38:14 -0500

61 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 07:10:13 -0800

42 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:12:42 -0500

22 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 11:48:13 -0500

23 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 18:05:47 +0100

52 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:12:53 -0800

57 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:29:50 -0800

65 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 19:56:23 -0500

53 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 21:32:18 -0500

48 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 06:26:55 +0100

48 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 06:59:27 +0000

30 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:45:43 -0800

19 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 07:07:46 -0500

17 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 10:08:14 -0500

53 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:21:43 +0100

22 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 12:04:11 -0500

27 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 23:23:05 -0500

38 lines

Re: "Ideal" Ambience

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:46:59 -0800

13 lines

New Thread

(Semitone) transposing keyboards

(Semitone) transposing keyboards

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 20:45:49 +0100

19 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 15:49:44 -0500

37 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:35:27 +0100

60 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:47:28 -0000

29 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:10:24 -0500

22 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 22:16:05 -0500

20 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 08:19:08 +0100

19 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:14:49 +0100

73 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 06:38:17 +0100

37 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:17:52 +0100

31 lines

(Semitone) transposing keyboards

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 15:26:49 +0100

23 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 08:40:14 +0100

48 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:21:11 +0100

61 lines

Re: (Semitone) transposing keyboards

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:04:09 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

***Re: lindley was buzzing--OT: Jerry Lewis

***Re: lindley was buzzing--OT: Jerry Lewis

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:38:47 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

1/12 PC assumption in the Lehman variant (was Re: Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning?)

1/12 PC assumption in the Lehman variant (was Re: Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning?)

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2006 13:54:20 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

2 humble woods was (Semitone) transposing keyboards

2 humble woods was (Semitone) transposing keyboards

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 17:53:48 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

555+ Scarlatti sonatas?

555+ Scarlatti sonatas?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:55:08 -0700

14 lines

Re: 555+ Scarlatti sonatas?

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 10:46:31 -0500

22 lines

Re: 555+ Scarlatti sonatas?

Dominique Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:58:30 EST

35 lines

New Thread

888

888

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 10:22:37 +1000

26 lines

Re: 888

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:14:28 +0100

59 lines

Re: 888

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

67 lines

Re: 888

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 07:47:05 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

888 and voicing levels

Re: 888 and voicing levels

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:49:25 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:26:45 -0700

81 lines

New Thread

A Bach breakfast!

A Bach breakfast!

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:27:56 -0500

26 lines

Re: A Bach breakfast!

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:20:33 -0800

35 lines

Re: A Bach breakfast!

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:33:12 -0500

27 lines

Re: A Bach breakfast!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:51:10 -0500

43 lines

Re: A Bach breakfast!

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:55:11 -0800

30 lines

Re: A Bach breakfast!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:21:46 +0400

31 lines

Re: A Bach breakfast!

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:53:44 -0800

54 lines

Re: A Bach breakfast!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:16:08 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

A kinder, gentler ... variation

Re: A kinder, gentler ... variation

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 02:38:33 -0500

26 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler ... variation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:43:26 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:04:51 -0700

37 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:00:47 +0100

67 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:31:41 -0700

93 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:13:17 +0100

21 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:28:18 -0700

44 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:59:27 +0100

21 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 14:01:25 -0700

63 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script variation

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:26:17 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

A kinder, gentler, MODIFIED Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script essay

Re: A kinder, gentler, MODIFIED Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script essay

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 22:04:33 -0700

25 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler, MODIFIED Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script essay

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:29:13 +0100

27 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler, MODIFIED Bach-Lehman WTC tuning script essay

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:33:28 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

A kinder, gentler...ah I was wrong there

Re: A kinder, gentler...ah I was wrong there

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 17:32:45 -0500

12 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler...ah I was wrong there

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:19:59 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

A kinder, gentler...what I will play

Re: A kinder, gentler...what I will play

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:39:20 -0500

22 lines

Re: A kinder, gentler...what I will play

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 06:36:01 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

a tuning sublist?

a tuning sublist?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:29:01 -0500

17 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:01:45 -0500

34 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 21:08:01 +0100

25 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

Paul Gunzelmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 15:28:11 -0500

18 lines

a tuning sublist?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:40:49 +0100

23 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:20:23 -0700

32 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 01:18:29 -0500

26 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:59:45 +0100

19 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:30:48 -0800

33 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 23:20:31 -0500

37 lines

Re: a tuning sublist?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:25:48 +0400

52 lines

New Thread

Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 16:57:21 -0500

32 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:42:42 +0100

31 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:48:52 -0500

60 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 07:49:40 -0800

48 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:03:21 +0100

50 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:17:23 -0500

31 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:24:05 +0100

125 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:06:51 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord, now organ

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, or the talking harpsichord, now organ

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 07:38:05 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Acoustics and major seventeenths, was a=440

Acoustics and major seventeenths, was a=440

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:48:43 +0100

47 lines

Re: Acoustics and major seventeenths, was a=440

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:17:56 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Administrative - All Read

Administrative - All Read

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:18:30 -0600

38 lines

Re: Administrative - All Read

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 08:55:48 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Administrative - confidential

Re: Administrative - confidential

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 03:11:22 +0200

24 lines

Re: Administrative - confidential

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 23:45:02 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Administrative -- one more thing

Administrative -- one more thing

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 17:33:34 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

All Your Harpsichords Are Belong To Us

All Your Harpsichords Are Belong To Us

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 04:43:51 -0500

19 lines

Re: All Your Harpsichords Are Belong To Us

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 06:54:23 -0500

37 lines

Re: All Your Harpsichords Are Belong To Us

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:24:51 +0100

32 lines

Re: All Your Harpsichords Are Belong To Us

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:54:47 +0100

26 lines

Re: All Your Harpsichords Are Belong To Us

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:19:47 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

ambiance

ambiance

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 00:30:58 -0800

16 lines

ambiance

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 22:18:28 -0800

16 lines

New Thread

Angela Hewitt AGAIN

Angela Hewitt AGAIN

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 07:23:13 -0700

80 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt AGAIN

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:03:47 -0500

30 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt AGAIN

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:33:49 -0500

23 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt AGAIN

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 11:07:48 -0500

99 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt AGAIN

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:11:07 -0500

36 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt AGAIN

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:04:49 +0100

14 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt AGAIN

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:22:05 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Apology

Apology

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:21:21 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

appropriate adhesives and "flimsy lids"

appropriate adhesives and "flimsy lids"

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:08:38 -0800

32 lines

Re: appropriate adhesives and "flimsy lids"

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:54:09 +0200

25 lines

Re: appropriate adhesives and "flimsy lids"

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:45:29 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

archives (was Steelers Won)

Re: archives (was Steelers Won)

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:27:38 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Aristoxenos in Mattheson about acoustical problematic wide overtempered 5ths, was Re: Tuned Bach really an ugly wolf A#-->F?

Aristoxenos in Mattheson about acoustical problematic wide overtempered 5ths, was Re: Tuned Bach really an ugly wolf A#-->F?

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 15:36:32 -0500

132 lines

New Thread

Armand-Louis Couperin in Nebraska tomorrow

Armand-Louis Couperin in Nebraska tomorrow

Ben Carlisle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:23:45 -0600

29 lines

Re: Armand-Louis Couperin in Nebraska tomorrow

Edward L Kottick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 16:34:44 -0600

35 lines

Re: Armand-Louis Couperin in Nebraska tomorrow

Edward L Kottick <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:53:26 -0600

41 lines

Re: Armand-Louis Couperin in Nebraska tomorrow

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 21:08:08 -0700

48 lines

New Thread

Bach Clavichord

Bach Clavichord

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 20:04:26 +1000

25 lines

New Thread

Bach temperamet in recital. or: Tuned Bach really an ugly wolf A#-->F?

Re: Bach temperamet in recital. or: Tuned Bach really an ugly wolf A#-->F?

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 03:08:53 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

Bach tempramet in recital

Bach tempramet in recital

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 05:39:18 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:55:57 -0800

74 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:27:33 -0500

39 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Noel Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:32:21 -0500

28 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:17:16 -0500

45 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:30:55 -0500

30 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:52:57 +0000

24 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:23:59 -0500

41 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:43:59 -0800

29 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:56:22 -0800

62 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:30:17 +0100

53 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:34:48 +0400

44 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:56:11 -0500

24 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:33:56 -0500

44 lines

Re: Back to todays 440Hz Norm, was Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:23:38 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Beat counting and bean counting

Beat counting and bean counting

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:35:02 +0100

64 lines

Re: Beat counting and bean counting

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:22:40 -0500

20 lines

Re: Beat counting and bean counting

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:56:06 -0700

76 lines

Re: Beat counting and bean counting

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:09:32 +0100

29 lines

Re: Beat counting and bean counting

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 21:27:57 +0100

56 lines

Re: Beat counting and bean counting

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 14:59:38 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Bending

Bending

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 09:34:25 -0800

91 lines

Re: Bending

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:08:31 +0100

52 lines

Re: Bending

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:41:15 -0800

40 lines

Re: Bending

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:57:07 -0500

18 lines

Re: Bending

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 00:11:14 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

Bending oak planks in eighteenth-century England

Bending oak planks in eighteenth-century England

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 22:25:54 -0000

66 lines

New Thread

Bizzi

Bizzi

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:34:19 +0000

19 lines

Re: Bizzi

Aarne Bielefeldt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 10:49:16 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Bone key tops

Bone key tops

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 23:32:54 -0500

105 lines

New Thread

Boring jacks!!!

Boring jacks!!!

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 06:50:50 +0000

24 lines

Re: Boring jacks!!!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:40:26 +0400

46 lines

Re: Boring jacks!!!

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 15:36:51 +0000

33 lines

Re: Boring jacks!!!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:26:21 +0400

55 lines

New Thread

broadwood grand for Thom

broadwood grand for Thom

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 22:20:58 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

Broadwood Link

Broadwood Link

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 07:50:32 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Broadwood piano for sale

Broadwood piano for sale

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 14:43:12 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Broadwood pianos

Broadwood pianos

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 11:02:33 +0000

78 lines

Broadwood pianos

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:41:48 +0000

28 lines

Re: Broadwood pianos

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:57:35 -0000

63 lines

Re: Broadwood pianos

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 18:58:21 +0100

37 lines

Re: Broadwood pianos

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:11:57 +0100

20 lines

Re: Broadwood pianos

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 04:00:46 +0400

75 lines

Re: Broadwood pianos

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:31:27 +0100

29 lines

Re: Broadwood pianos

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 23:08:01 +0400

69 lines

New Thread

Broadwoods on recordings

Re: Broadwoods on recordings

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:26:04 EST

13 lines

New Thread

Buenos Aires

Buenos Aires

Meg Irwin-Brandon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:56:47 -0500

64 lines

Re: Buenos Aires

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 18:21:15 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

buzzing hrpscd

buzzing hrpscd

Stephen Kabat <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:00:00 -0500

34 lines

Re: buzzing hrpscd

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 18:29:48 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Care with titles of subjects

Care with titles of subjects

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:17:04 -0000

48 lines

New Thread

chaconne today

chaconne today

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:01:04 +0200

17 lines

Re: chaconne today

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:42:48 -0500

46 lines

Re: chaconne today

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:23:36 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

circulating temp with a wide 5th in it...

circulating temp with a wide 5th in it...

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 18:50:23 -0500

42 lines

Re: circulating temp with a wide 5th in it...

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 17:15:55 -0700

55 lines

Re: circulating temp with a wide 5th in it...

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 14:13:27 -0500

88 lines

New Thread

Completely off topic: harpsichords

Completely off topic: harpsichords

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 05:13:09 -0800

21 lines

Re: Completely off topic: harpsichords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 17:50:17 +0100

22 lines

Re: Completely off topic: harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 23:40:37 +0400

40 lines

New Thread

Creative organology

Re: Creative organology

A&D Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:53:32 +1000

22 lines

Re: Creative organology

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 20:00:37 -0500

23 lines

Re: Creative organology

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:21:22 +1000

30 lines

Re: Creative organology

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 03:53:05 +0200

34 lines

Re: Creative organology

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:15:28 +0100

19 lines

Re: Creative organology

A&D Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:52:31 +1000

29 lines

Re: Creative organology

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

23 lines

Re: Creative organology

A&D Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:26:18 +1000

47 lines

New Thread

Damper cloth was Nodding off

Re: Damper cloth was Nodding off

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 06:31:21 +0100

25 lines

Re: Damper cloth was Nodding off

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:13:45 +0000

54 lines

Re: Damper cloth was Nodding off

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 06:01:44 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:45:13 -0600

24 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:06:31 +0100

24 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:20:01 -0600

31 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 14:24:05 +0000

39 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:39:35 +0200

18 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:34:04 +0000

41 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:01:41 +0100

44 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:15:39 +0200

56 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:31:43 +0200

27 lines

Re: Decay (was Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:36:09 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Directory

Directory

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:14:07 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament

discoveries: some relevant squiggles from Bach-documents indicating temperament

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 18:59:12 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Dover was Italian Virginal

Dover was Italian Virginal

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 16:36:14 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

drawings

drawings

dave-jane johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 16:31:29 -0600

21 lines

Re: drawings

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 19:19:55 -0800

23 lines

Re: drawings

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:06:11 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Dulken repertoire

Dulken repertoire

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:28:59 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

e-bay offering

e-bay offering

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:07:50 -0500

19 lines

Re: e-bay offering

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 05:39:28 -0800

33 lines

Re: e-bay offering

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:02:19 +0100

20 lines

Re: e-bay offering

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:32:33 -0500

25 lines

Re: e-bay offering

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:10:38 -0800

27 lines

Re: e-bay offering

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 10:35:49 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Eagle feathers?

Eagle feathers?

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 01:59:51 -0800

14 lines

Re: Eagle feathers?

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 05:19:12 -0600

34 lines

Re: Eagle feathers?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:07:39 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Early Broadwoods: was Strike points......

Early Broadwoods: was Strike points......

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 23:18:19 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

eau de Bizzi

eau de Bizzi

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:37:25 +0200

22 lines

Re: eau de Bizzi

Aarne Bielefeldt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:35:31 -0800

15 lines

New Thread

eclecticism, was English harpsichords

Re: eclecticism, was English harpsichords

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:27:10 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

End of spoofing once and for all

End of spoofing once and for all

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:36:32 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

English harpsichords

English harpsichords

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:36:23 -0000

22 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:02:24 -0500

35 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:20:43 +0000

49 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:32:18 -0000

18 lines

Re: English harpsichords

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:44:19 +0100

30 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:12:04 -0000

44 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:50:13 +0000

43 lines

Re: English harpsichords

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:57:10 -0500

55 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:00:35 -0800

82 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 08:03:54 -0800

32 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:21:20 -0500

56 lines

Re: English harpsichords

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:29:14 -0500

25 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:35:17 -0600

35 lines

Re: English harpsichords

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:35:54 +0100

25 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:30:24 -0800

59 lines

Re: English harpsichords

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:43:06 -0500

23 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:07:05 -0800

31 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:33:01 -0600

44 lines

Re: English harpsichords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:50:09 +0100

43 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:31:49 +0400

76 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:48:48 +0400

37 lines

Re: English harpsichords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:11:20 +0100

25 lines

Re: English harpsichords

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 07:24:18 -0700

28 lines

Re: English harpsichords

William C. Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:42:15 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

English harpsichords again

English harpsichords again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 15:20:45 +0000

43 lines

Re: English harpsichords again

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:32:29 +0200

37 lines

Re: English harpsichords again

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:59:16 -0500

37 lines

Re: English harpsichords again

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:51:16 -0800

155 lines

English Harpsichords again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 20:14:58 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

English harpsichords also becomes fir

English harpsichords also becomes fir

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 23:10:40 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

English harpsichords/pix submitals

Re: English harpsichords/pix submitals

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:35:27 -0500

50 lines

Re: English harpsichords/pix submitals

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:54:39 -0000

77 lines

New Thread

fakery on the list

fakery on the list

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 20:56:42 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Festival of Flanders, 2006

Festival of Flanders, 2006

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:03:03 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

fish or fowl

fish or fowl

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 01:21:26 +0200

17 lines

Re: fish or fowl

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:39:16 -0500

22 lines

Re: fish or fowl

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 18:46:16 -0500

15 lines

Re: fish or fowl

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:39:38 +0100

26 lines

Re: fish or fowl

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 06:45:34 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

fishy was Flimsy

fishy was Flimsy

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:12:51 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

Flimsy lid - cause for concern ?

Flimsy lid - cause for concern ?

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:15:39 -0000

35 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - cause for concern ?

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 20:30:42 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:57:35 -0000

38 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

55 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:45:34 +0100

60 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 07:47:22 -0800

43 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 11:16:45 -0500

21 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:32:47 -0800

57 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:32:33 -0800

46 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:35:03 -0000

40 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:38:02 -0000

88 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:55:41 -0800

23 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:14:30 -0800

71 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:18:35 +0000

57 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:27:02 -0800

49 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:35:42 -0000

51 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:29:54 EST

30 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:42:27 -0800

41 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 09:44:23 -0800

22 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 19:06:26 +0100

47 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:23:06 +0400

39 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:26:02 +0400

36 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:01:35 +0000

64 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

67 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:29:20 -0500

27 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:46:13 -0500

21 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:28:55 -0800

46 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 15:39:12 -0800

18 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 20:19:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:43:44 +0100

45 lines

Re: Flimsy lid - re-gluing moldings

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 07:49:17 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:42:26 +0100

102 lines

Re: Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:43:47 -0500

38 lines

Re: Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:31:36 +0100

72 lines

Re: Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 23:35:11 +0100

41 lines

Re: Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:05:02 +0100

23 lines

Re: Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:12:48 +0100

32 lines

Re: Frescobaldi's toccatas - was Re: Sweelinck edition

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:44:50 +0400

41 lines

New Thread

Fw: double your wiki's space (harpsichords)

Fw: double your wiki's space (harpsichords)

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:30:52 -0500

64 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: a tuning sublist?

Fw: Re: a tuning sublist?

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 09:16:15 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Gabfest in Paris-March

Gabfest in Paris-March

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 01:50:27 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

Goldberg variations?

Goldberg variations?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 14:30:35 -0800

14 lines

Re: Goldberg variations?

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:34:13 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

gpg signing (was: [HPSCHD-L] testing phoneyness)

gpg signing (was: [HPSCHD-L] testing phoneyness)

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:53:04 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

hammerfluegel photo site

hammerfluegel photo site

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 01:16:36 +1000

16 lines

New Thread

Handel Mattheson question

Handel Mattheson question

J. Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:08:59 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Concert 2/12/2006 -- Topeka, KS

Harpsichord Concert 2/12/2006 -- Topeka, KS

Nicholas Good <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 12:00:36 -0800

71 lines

New Thread

harpsichord freight

harpsichord freight

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 12:06:27 +0000

32 lines

Re: harpsichord freight

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 08:58:57 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

harpsichord wardrobe

harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 15:06:55 +0200

49 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 07:59:15 -0500

28 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:41:33 -0500

28 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 05:58:12 -0800

21 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 08:45:48 -0600

56 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:58:10 -0500

21 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:14:06 -0500

29 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:16:13 -0500

82 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 11:15:41 -0500

36 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:42:52 -0700

48 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:23:02 +0200

18 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:07:39 -0500

81 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:13:10 -0500

44 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:27:39 -0500

21 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 13:12:13 -0500

25 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 10:19:15 -0800

31 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 23:04:43 +0400

50 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Philip Bayles <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:05:44 -0800

50 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 19:16:16 -0500

39 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2006 04:02:27 +0200

29 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:26:05 -0600

38 lines

Re: harpsichord wardrobe

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 20:37:11 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

He's alive

He's alive

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:06:20 -0500

14 lines

Re: He's alive

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 12:50:37 +0000

24 lines

Re: He's alive

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 01:16:47 +0400

32 lines

Re: He's alive

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 19:26:46 -0500

61 lines

Re: He's alive

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 16:52:28 -0800

98 lines

Re: He's alive

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 20:18:09 +0000

34 lines

Re: He's alive

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 18:06:20 -0800

84 lines

Re: He's alive

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 21:30:04 -0500

97 lines

Re: He's alive

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:29:34 +0400

85 lines

Re: He's alive

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 02:55:33 -0800

133 lines

New Thread

horse chestnut

horse chestnut

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:25:08 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

How the spofer does it

How the spofer does it

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 05:01:49 -0500

16 lines

Re: How the spofer does it

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:19:26 -0800

24 lines

Re: How the spofer does it

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:42:19 -0500

26 lines

Re: How the spofer does it

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:09:34 +0100

17 lines

Re: How the spofer does it

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:52:05 -0500

21 lines

Re: How the spofer does it

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:00:03 +0100

24 lines

Re: How the spofer does it

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:24:06 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

how to add excitement to a concert

how to add excitement to a concert

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 19:25:35 -0700

21 lines

Re: how to add excitement to a concert

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:44:36 -0800

44 lines

Re: how to add excitement to a concert

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:17:03 -0700

52 lines

Re: how to add excitement to a concert

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 14:54:13 -0500

24 lines

Re: how to add excitement to a concert

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 21:38:12 -0700

30 lines

New Thread

Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Ideal Ambience becomes fir

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 22:00:44 +0200

34 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:05:16 +0100

41 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 15:26:32 +0100

37 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 01:22:23 +0200

42 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:21:24 +0400

38 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:58:58 +0100

24 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 08:21:20 +0100

52 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:34:49 +0100

20 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

37 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:13:11 +0100

20 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

19 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:56:02 +1000

47 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

59 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 23:52:01 +0400

44 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:51:39 -0800

68 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 03:12:22 +0200

17 lines

Re: Ideal Ambience becomes fir

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 20:49:30 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

inexplicable craze

inexplicable craze

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:40:17 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

Interesting digital harpsichord at Germany eBay

Interesting digital harpsichord at Germany eBay

Jack Diakun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 10:03:00 +0100

20 lines

Re: Interesting digital harpsichord at Germany eBay

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 05:07:18 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

Intruder alert

Intruder alert

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 06:52:16 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

irritating vs active

irritating vs active

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 23:57:51 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

It's NOT just in quotes, David!

It's NOT just in quotes, David!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 04:54:11 -0500

103 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:46:12 +0100

20 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:48:35 +0100

20 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:29:40 -0500

15 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:57:30 +0100

22 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:19:41 -0600

33 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:37:15 -0500

44 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:26:50 -0600

30 lines

Re: It's NOT just in quotes, David!

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 22:00:44 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 16:10:43 +0000

14 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 08:46:18 -0800

27 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 17:15:56 +0000

40 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:58:31 -0500

19 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:01:37 +0200

23 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 12:32:36 -0800

29 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 21:43:42 -0600

32 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 13:45:39 +0000

27 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:48:32 +0200

17 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:56:46 -0600

36 lines

Re: Italian Virginal Suggestions Request

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:25:29 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

J.S. Bachs tunings group at yahoo, was Re: fractions of comma

J.S. Bachs tunings group at yahoo, was Re: fractions of comma

Andreas Sparschuh <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 11:19:34 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

jacck tongues

jacck tongues

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:00:20 +0000

24 lines

Re: jacck tongues

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 19:17:14 +0200

23 lines

Re: jacck tongues

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:29:17 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

jack tongues

jack tongues

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:07:25 +0000

23 lines

Jack tongues

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 08:16:54 +0100

25 lines

Re: Jack tongues

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 07:44:12 +0000

56 lines

Jack tongues

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 13:47:02 +0000

52 lines

Re: Jack tongues

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 27 Feb 2006 10:01:56 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

jacks again

jacks again

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:31:52 +0000

28 lines

Re: jacks again

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 17:08:38 +0200

27 lines

Re: jacks again

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 07:13:26 -0800

40 lines

Re: jacks again

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 15:16:05 +0000

30 lines

Re: jacks again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:25:19 +0100

16 lines

Re: jacks again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 18:49:20 +0100

25 lines

Re: jacks again

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:57:40 -0500

29 lines

Re: jacks again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:08:08 +0100

25 lines

Re: jacks again

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:08:46 -0800

21 lines

Re: jacks again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 18:13:56 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Just got my first harpsichord...

Just got my first harpsichord...

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:57:05 -0000

46 lines

Re: Just got my first harpsichord...

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 07:50:30 -0800

64 lines

Re: Just got my first harpsichord...

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 05:01:06 -0800

57 lines

Re: Just got my first harpsichord...

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 08:05:46 -0500

36 lines

Re: Just got my first harpsichord...

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 15:04:54 -0000

96 lines

Re: Just got my first harpsichord...

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 14:44:34 -0800

73 lines

New Thread

Kendrick Perala, R.I.P.

Kendrick Perala, R.I.P.

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:21:44 -0800

95 lines

New Thread

Koopman

Koopman

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 09:48:18 +0100

26 lines

Re: Koopman

Noel Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 16:09:11 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:44:34 +0100

27 lines

Re: Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:20:41 +0000

50 lines

Re: Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 22:44:18 +0000

42 lines

Re: Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 18:09:19 -0500

45 lines

Re: Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:54:04 -0800

45 lines

Re: Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 15:57:00 -0800

24 lines

Re: Landowska and Gordon-Woodhouse on the BBC - but hurry

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:06:15 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Later Trost-Tabelle

Later Trost-Tabelle

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 22:32:42 +0100

89 lines

New Thread

Lego Harpsichord

Lego Harpsichord

Saverio Lomartire <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 12:47:58 +0100

42 lines

Re: Lego Harpsichord

Robert C L Watson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:18:25 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

lindley was buzzing

lindley was buzzing

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:31:59 +0200

21 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:16:46 +0100

64 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 09:32:33 +0100

43 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:34:41 -0800

30 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:02:35 -0800

38 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Stephen Kabat <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 09:16:02 -0500

14 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:33:43 -0500

25 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:24:51 +0100

36 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:34:15 +0100

33 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:38:02 +0000

26 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:53:42 -0800

36 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 18:56:11 -0800

49 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:47:51 +0400

32 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:44:55 +0100

24 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 07:08:58 -0500

21 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:13:25 +0100

42 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 18:37:56 -0800

35 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 19:49:57 -0800

30 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 10:12:14 +0100

26 lines

Re: lindley was buzzing

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:51:31 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Mimi Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:11:48 -0000

26 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

46 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

41 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:18:48 -0700

39 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

L. T. Pirolli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:28:47 EST

10 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:29:32 -0500

35 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 11:44:40 -0500

19 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:26:37 -0500

32 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 00:32:14 +0400

37 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:55:38 -0500

49 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:15:01 EST

20 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 13:35:39 -0800

15 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 17:24:30 -0500

31 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 18:38:33 -0500

51 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 19:03:59 EST

37 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:00:02 -0700

38 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 21:09:55 -0700

32 lines

Re: List of Composers-English Harpsichords.

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 11:45:48 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

little square

little square

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 22:37:23 +1000

15 lines

little square

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 19:56:40 +0100

33 lines

Re: little square

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 20:41:19 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Looking for a harpsichord

Looking for a harpsichord

alex <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:37:13 -0800

23 lines

Re: Looking for a harpsichord

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 05:37:22 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

Louis Armand Couperin

Louis Armand Couperin

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 10:40:07 -0800

25 lines

Re: Louis Armand Couperin

Ben Carlisle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 13:22:51 -0600

63 lines

Re: Louis Armand Couperin

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:00:27 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Magritte's harpsichord (Was: Intruder alert!)

Magritte's harpsichord (Was: Intruder alert!)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 10:03:32 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

Maihingen

Maihingen

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2006 12:56:05 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Maihingen again

Maihingen again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 09:16:26 +0100

84 lines

Re: Maihingen again

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 20:43:29 -0800

42 lines

Re: Maihingen again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 06:14:11 +0100

32 lines

Re: Maihingen again

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 22:33:53 -0800

43 lines

Re: Maihingen again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:44:28 +0100

20 lines

Maihingen again

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 19:47:47 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Makers Harpsichord and Fortepiano

Re: Makers Harpsichord and Fortepiano

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 13:51:54 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

Mark Stevenson

Mark Stevenson

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:47:17 -0000

27 lines

Re: Mark Stevenson

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:18:06 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Meantone vs. ET

Meantone vs. ET

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 09:28:22 -0500

12 lines

Re: Meantone vs. ET

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 17 Feb 2006 10:07:48 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 22:52:53 -0500

57 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:11:18 -0600

52 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:37:45 -0500

33 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:16:02 -0600

30 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:01:47 -0500

30 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 17:59:49 +0100

29 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:55:29 -0500

20 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:53:46 +0100

40 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:53:51 -0500

48 lines

Re: Michaelangelo Rossi recordings

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:28:21 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

More jacks

More jacks

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

14 lines

New Thread

More rossi

More rossi

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

13 lines

New Thread

More Rousset froberger Couchet HMA1951372

More Rousset froberger Couchet HMA1951372

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

19 lines

New Thread

more spoofing...

more spoofing...

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 13:06:08 -0500

29 lines

Re: more spoofing...

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 12:06:37 -0700

35 lines

Re: more spoofing...

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:44:34 -0500

61 lines

Re: more spoofing...

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:49:27 -0500

25 lines

Re: more spoofing...

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:23:48 +0400

34 lines

Re: more spoofing...

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:42:15 -0500

30 lines

Re: more spoofing...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:52:10 -0500

45 lines

Re: more spoofing...

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 16:14:36 -0800

49 lines

Re: more spoofing...

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 21:32:40 -0500

54 lines

Re: more spoofing...

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 11:42:03 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

more varia

more varia

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 01:05:48 -0500

8 lines

New Thread

Moving a harpsichord from US to Europe: any advice?

Moving a harpsichord from US to Europe: any advice?

Marzena Hepburn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 16:09:17 -0800

26 lines

Re: Moving a harpsichord from US to Europe: any advice?

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:05:26 -0000

74 lines

Re: Moving a harpsichord from US to Europe: any advice?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:24:51 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Mozart K608

Mozart K608

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 09:15:21 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

Mozart Piano

Mozart Piano

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:39:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:33:39 +0100

20 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:57:54 +1000

31 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 06:58:54 -0500

38 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 08:11:34 -0500

35 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 10:21:37 -0500

28 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 19:30:25 +0100

46 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:00:25 -0500

22 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 20:11:43 +0100

36 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:31:37 -0800

46 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 04:15:16 +0400

38 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:52:37 +0100

21 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 09:47:58 +0100

40 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 19:20:43 +0100

59 lines

Re: Mozart Piano

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 00:09:46 +0400

58 lines

New Thread

Mozart Piano 31

Re: Mozart Piano 31

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 18:32:03 +0100

55 lines

Re: Mozart Piano 31

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 12:44:31 +0100

55 lines

Re: Mozart Piano 31

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 23:14:53 +0400

31 lines

New Thread

mozart tuning

mozart tuning

Stephen Kabat <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 12:54:22 -0500

13 lines

Re: mozart tuning

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 21:55:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: mozart tuning

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 22:25:38 -0500

39 lines

Re: mozart tuning

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:50:06 -0800

27 lines

Re: mozart tuning

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:58:54 +0100

58 lines

mozart tuning

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:20:28 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 15:15:01 -0500

61 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 23:42:48 +0200

27 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 9 Feb 2006 13:59:36 -0800

46 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 04:57:09 -0500

26 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:51:58 +0100

17 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 17:54:48 +0100

56 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 18:02:02 +0100

78 lines

mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 12:14:21 -0500

136 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 07:55:09 +0100

22 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 11:15:51 -0500

114 lines

Re: mozart tuning for todays modern a'=442 Hz

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 12:25:23 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Mozart's keyboards

Mozart's keyboards

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:50:42 -0500

24 lines

Re: Mozart's keyboards

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 18:13:42 -0500

36 lines

Re: Mozart's keyboards

martin puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 09:03:57 +0100

44 lines

Re: Mozart's keyboards

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 23:58:41 +0400

47 lines

New Thread

My first harpsichord -4' dampers

My first harpsichord -4' dampers

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 02:04:05 -0800

17 lines

Re: My first harpsichord -4' dampers

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:12:49 -0000

55 lines

Re: My first harpsichord -4' dampers

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

23 lines

New Thread

Myrrh....

Myrrh....

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:57:01 -0600

12 lines

Re: Myrrh....

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 14:43:20 -0800

51 lines

Re: Myrrh....

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:42:30 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

naked major 17ths in Bach

naked major 17ths in Bach

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 16:59:34 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

Nanette Streicher project forte piano available

Nanette Streicher project forte piano available

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 8 Feb 2006 19:24:11 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

New car smell

New car smell

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:00:09 -0600

30 lines

Re: New car smell

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:17:57 -0800

64 lines

Re: New car smell

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 11:37:45 -0800

15 lines

Re: New car smell

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 15:15:03 -0500

45 lines

Re: New car smell

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:30:34 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

New Mexico concert

New Mexico concert

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 09:48:59 -0700

55 lines

Re: New Mexico concert

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 12:28:47 -0500

74 lines

Re: New Mexico concert

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 21:06:18 +0200

20 lines

Re: New Mexico concert

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 14:24:20 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Nodding off

Re: Nodding off

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 06:36:52 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

nose rub was leg pull was it's not just...

nose rub was leg pull was it's not just...

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 14:54:39 +0200

26 lines

New Thread

oak was Squishing bentsides

oak was Squishing bentsides

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 04:22:52 +0200

25 lines

Re: oak was Squishing bentsides

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 13:29:15 +1000

62 lines

Re: oak was Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

15 lines

Re: oak was Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

26 lines

Re: oak was Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

11 lines

Re: oak was Squishing bentsides

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 03:39:49 +0400

28 lines

New Thread

old sparky

old sparky

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 19:13:10 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

organs again sorry

organs again sorry

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 16 Feb 2006 08:18:36 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

OT **** [HPSCHD-L] Speak no Evil

OT **** [HPSCHD-L] Speak no Evil

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

40 lines

New Thread

OT--Re: How the spofer does it

OT--Re: How the spofer does it

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:46:18 -0500

15 lines

Re: OT--Re: How the spofer does it

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:15:37 +0000

25 lines

Re: OT--Re: How the spofer does it

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 05:29:43 -0500

36 lines

Re: OT--Re: How the spofer does it

Margo Dillard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 17:35:06 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

OT: j. lewis and bottom wax.

OT: j. lewis and bottom wax.

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 07:57:03 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

Pbwiki Problems

Pbwiki Problems

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 09:37:48 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Performance Practice Review: call for submissions

Performance Practice Review: call for submissions

Robert Zappulla <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 16:30:13 -0800

189 lines

New Thread

phoney identity

phoney identity

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:50:54 +0100

13 lines

Re: phoney identity

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 19:52:18 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

Photo site email link broken ?

Photo site email link broken ?

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 15:31:48 -0000

27 lines

Re: Photo site email link broken ?

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 09:50:15 -0600

30 lines

Re: Photo site email link broken ?

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:08:40 -0500

34 lines

Re: Photo site email link broken ?

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 17:15:11 -0000

47 lines

Re: Photo site email link broken ?

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:25:54 -0600

24 lines

Re: Photo site email link broken ?

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:30:48 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Plucked keyboard at Olympics

Plucked keyboard at Olympics

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 04:45:01 -0500

16 lines

Re: Plucked keyboard at Olympics

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 13 Feb 2006 21:12:50 -0500

36 lines

Re: Plucked keyboard at Olympics

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 09:15:58 -0500

15 lines

Re: Plucked keyboard at Olympics

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:48:35 -0500

44 lines

Re: Plucked keyboard at Olympics

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 12:30:19 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

positiv

positiv

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 02:26:03 GMT

18 lines

New Thread

possible approach to mozart tuning

possible approach to mozart tuning

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 05:23:55 -0500

29 lines

Re: possible approach to mozart tuning

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 10 Feb 2006 14:49:12 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Ravens, was Re: To oil or not to oil?

Ravens, was Re: To oil or not to oil?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Feb 2006 08:38:29 +0400

59 lines

New Thread

re the fakes!

re the fakes!

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 07:28:08 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

re. English harpsichords

re. English harpsichords

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:02:27 +0200

76 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 18:03:23 -0000

25 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 10:17:54 -0800

50 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:59:48 +0100

32 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 21:59:19 +0200

31 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:49:57 +0200

23 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 01:12:54 +0400

66 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:25:34 -0800

61 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:13:30 -0500

50 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 17:46:34 -0500

29 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 19:14:24 -0500

63 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 20:55:13 -0500

29 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

J.M. Marks <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:19:34 -0500

56 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:27:53 +0100

27 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 08:35:01 +0100

24 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 12:28:28 +0100

22 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:48:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 14:43:02 +0200

26 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 15:15:28 +0200

18 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 16:21:56 +0200

27 lines

Re: re. English harpsichords

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 06:10:05 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

re. English harpsichords - and photos

Re: re. English harpsichords - and photos

Martin Robinson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 15 Feb 2006 10:24:39 -0000

20 lines

New Thread

re. Veneer was English harpsichords

Re: re. Veneer was English harpsichords

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 11:01:00 -0800

57 lines

Re: re. Veneer was English harpsichords

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 22:11:03 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

Recital and a question

Recital and a question

Meg Irwin-Brandon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 21 Feb 2006 22:44:57 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

registration of double pluck

registration of double pluck

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 12:44:29 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

Reid Byers

Reid Byers

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 17:09:35 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

replacement Clavichord strings 1956 Goble

replacement Clavichord strings 1956 Goble

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 14 Feb 2006 13:33:14 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Request for y'r drawings

Request for y'r drawings

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 19:03:03 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Reviewers needed

Reviewers needed

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 08:32:02 -0000

31 lines

New Thread

roasted composer

roasted composer

Meg Irwin-Brandon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 09:23:26 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Ruckers numbers

Ruckers numbers

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

38 lines

New Thread

ruckers scaling

ruckers scaling

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:44:09 +0000

27 lines

New Thread

Rutkowski and Robinette

Rutkowski and Robinette

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 13:13:35 -0600

40 lines

Re: Rutkowski and Robinette

Dominique Perkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:28:50 EST

23 lines

Re: Rutkowski and Robinette

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 19 Feb 2006 14:36:49 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

sap ID was 1/12 PC assumption in the Lehman variant (was Re: Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning?)

sap ID was 1/12 PC assumption in the Lehman variant (was Re: Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning?)

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:04:36 +0200

31 lines

Re: sap ID was 1/12 PC assumption in the Lehman variant (was Re: Wide 5th discussion of Lehmans private fun tuning?)

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 18 Feb 2006 19:00:57 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Speak no Evil

Speak no Evil

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 21:48:21 +0000

17 lines

Re: Speak no Evil

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:40:29 +0200

30 lines

Re: Speak no Evil

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 02:41:23 +0000

30 lines

Re: Speak no Evil

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 22 Feb 2006 20:16:24 -0700

56 lines

Re: Speak no Evil

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 01:59:29 -0500

48 lines

Re: Speak no Evil

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 04:37:03 -0500

12 lines

Re: Speak no Evil

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 13:28:49 +0200

20 lines

Re: Speak no Evil

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 00:23:37 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Spoofing and e-mail ease

Re: Spoofing and e-mail ease

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 18:13:06 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

square piano tuning

square piano tuning

Lisa Davidson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 20:22:59 -0800

18 lines

Re: square piano tuning

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:14:12 +1000

28 lines

square piano tuning

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:30:53 +0100

32 lines

Re: square piano tuning

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 07:10:00 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

Squishing bentsides

Re: Squishing bentsides

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 16:34:07 +0200

29 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

45 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 19:29:27 +0000

35 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 15:30:42 +0100

19 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 00:21:17 +0200

29 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

13 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 11:34:11 +0100

30 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

36 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 4 Feb 2006 07:27:49 -0500

44 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 03:57:21 +0400

46 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

23 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

15 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 00:00:00 GMT

24 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 15:06:28 -0800

70 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 03:03:38 +0200

27 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 17:26:23 -0800

28 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 5 Feb 2006 20:31:56 +0000

37 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 11:38:30 +1000

34 lines

squishing bentsides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 06:26:52 +0100

31 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:15:06 +0100

25 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:15:56 +0100

17 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:25:15 +0100

38 lines

Re: Squishing bentsides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 6 Feb 2006 07:26:36 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Steelers won!

Steelers won!

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 12:02:35 -0500

17 lines

Re: Steelers won!

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 10:56:55 -0800

30 lines

Re: Steelers won!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 13:56:36 -0500

21 lines

Re: Steelers won!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 7 Feb 2006 14:30:38 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

Strike points on Broadwoods, an example

Re: Strike points on Broadwoods, an example

Mimi Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 20:10:58 -0000

35 lines

New Thread

Strike points, and a p.s. on fake postings

Re: Strike points, and a p.s. on fake postings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 11:30:40 -0500

62 lines

Re: Strike points, and a p.s. on fake postings

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:55:52 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 06:43:46 -0500

35 lines

Re: Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 07:28:05 -0600

62 lines

Re: Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 15:10:34 +0100

59 lines

Re: Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 2 Feb 2006 10:03:21 -0500

26 lines

Re: Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 19:03:27 +0100

20 lines

Re: Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:40:50 -0500

43 lines

Re: Strike points: % wrong tool for the job

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 16:15:37 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

subjected, was harpsichord wardrobe

subjected, was harpsichord wardrobe

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 16:16:42 +0200

18 lines

Re: subjected, was harpsichord wardrobe

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 09:59:02 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Sunday Feb. 12, Savannah, GA program

Sunday Feb. 12, Savannah, GA program

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 16:46:58 +0000

13 lines

New Thread

surface treatments

surface treatments

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:03:30 +0200

13 lines

New Thread

Sweelinck edition

Sweelinck edition

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 20:37:32 +0100

21 lines

Re: Sweelinck edition

Nicholas Good <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 13:23:30 -0800

47 lines

Re: Sweelinck edition

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 17:20:22 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

testing phoneyness

testing phoneyness

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 12:41:37 -0500

11 lines

Re: testing phoneyness

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:16:06 -0500

29 lines

Re: testing phoneyness

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 13:33:04 -0500

55 lines

Re: testing phoneyness

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:10:54 -0500

20 lines

Re: testing phoneyness

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 14:27:53 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

That's *O*T (Was: Strike points, and a p.s. on fake postings)

That's *O*T (Was: Strike points, and a p.s. on fake postings)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 09:40:37 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

the agony and the ecstasy, part 2: the agony

the agony and the ecstasy, part 2: the agony

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 11 Feb 2006 21:31:54 +0200

35 lines

Re: the agony and the ecstasy, part 2: the agony

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 12 Feb 2006 21:35:18 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

The Johann Sebsatian Bach Code (on the silent Rosetta stone, of course): Squiggles and Speculation

The Johann Sebsatian Bach Code (on the silent Rosetta stone, of course): Squiggles and Speculation

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 28 Feb 2006 12:25:56 +0100

126 lines

New Thread

The WWKB has moved

The WWKB has moved

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 20 Feb 2006 09:48:25 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

To Canadian or not to Canadian?

Re: To Canadian or not to Canadian?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 06:30:03 -0800

27 lines

Re: To Canadian or not to Canadian?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 10:39:13 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

to drill or not to drill ? (tuning pins)

to drill or not to drill ? (tuning pins)

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 3 Feb 2006 14:10:00 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

To oil or not to oil?

To oil or not to oil?

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:22:13 -0500

26 lines

Re: To oil or not to oil?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 17:16:25 -0800

74 lines

Re: To oil or not to oil?

Turpin Fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 24 Feb 2006 05:15:24 +0200

12 lines

Re: To oil or not to oil?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 19:17:03 -0800

24 lines

Re: To oil or not to oil?

bgarfink, bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 23:54:50 -0500

28 lines

Re: To oil or not to oil?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 23 Feb 2006 21:09:30 -0800

28 lines