LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


January 2006


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

'tis V (1 message)
*********** new web interface OT, but frustrated. (1 message)
01/28/06 Change of email address (1 message)
1 step forward and 2 steps back; was B major (3 messages)
1745 Dulcken design pitch (9 messages)
<No subject> (1 message)
A question for Redstone ... (2 messages)
A question for Redstone ...viols (3 messages)
A question for the chemists (9 messages)
Addresses Needed (1 message)
African or European swallow? (5 messages)
African or European swallow? (really Vallotti/Young) (2 messages)
Angela Hewitt Bach (17 messages)
Angela Hewitt Bach/EEeew! (2 messages)
apology, was Marpurg 1790 - a sample (2 messages)
Archives? (2 messages)
arithmetically faked roots (1 message)
attn. dennis (5 messages)
B major (2 messages)
Bachaus Harpsichord (1 message)
Bachhaus harpsichord (8 messages)
Bachhaus Harpsichord - harder to play (1 message)
Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS (6 messages)
Bob van Asperen's French Suites (5 messages)
Books bound in human skin... what next? (1 message)
Bose noise-cancelling 'phones (1 message)
Brass vs. iron (2 messages)
Brass vs. iron BUT EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME! (3 messages)
Brass vs. iron: MISATTRIBUTION (1 message)
brass wires of the world (2 messages)
Casanova film 1753 Venice (1 message)
charm (1 message)
clathrates (4 messages)
Clavichords in Japan, was: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments (2 messages)
Clavier (1 message)
conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments (9 messages)
Concert Sunday in Boston -- lotsa'nachronisms (2 messages)
Creative organology (6 messages)
Damper cloth was Nodding off (4 messages)
Damping, was diatribe (12 messages)
Danzil's treatise (2 messages)
dentists who tune keyboards (3 messages)
Dependence on foreign oil is at an end? (2 messages)
Dulcken gap repair (2 messages)
Dulcken gap repair again (2 messages)
Dulcken gap repair LONG NOTE (4 messages)
E minor (1 message)
Earlie computer game (2 messages)
Early Fepo, was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach (2 messages)
Electronic tuner pickup (4 messages)
EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME! (7 messages)
English -> French translation needed - PAID! (2 messages)
favorite Mozart quotes (2 messages)
files (2 messages)
Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe (16 messages)
flag-poling clarification (1 message)
flagpoling? (3 messages)
footnote (1 message)
Friction in jack guides (corners) (2 messages)
Fw: CIMCIM-L: Important Acquisition by the University of Edinburgh (1 message)
Fw: Re: new soundtrackINFO correction posted (1 message)
Fw: [HPSCHD-L] Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book (1 message)
geometric 5ths (any reasonable size) by ear (1 message)
gift wood (1 message)
Global warming and rare wood and etc. (7 messages)
Gluers! (1 message)
Grrr! (4 messages)
Happy Birthday Mozart! (6 messages)
Happy Birthday Mozart! 1-27-1756 (1 message)
Happy New Year! (1 message)
Hardness of Tuning Pins (4 messages)
Harpsichord Moving (1 message)
Harpsichord workshop in San Antonio february 24-26 with Richard Egarr (1 message)
Headphones (10 messages)
Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book (5 messages)
History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord (5 messages)
Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help? (29 messages)
Holes (32 messages)
Holey moley (25 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Jan 2006 to 23 Jan 2006 (#2006-22) (1 message)
I'm not a Luddite. Really, I'm not. (1 message)
ideal citizen was attn. chemists (1 message)
inegale (8 messages)
inegale/temperaments (1 message)
INSIPID PITCH (2 messages)
International moving (2 messages)
Intruder alert! (9 messages)
IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample) (8 messages)
IQ test + maple (4 messages)
Italian speech was Damping was diatribe (3 messages)
its HIP to be square (1 message)
Jack's Dulcken projuct (1 message)
Jacks again (1 message)
Jones-Clayton jacks (1 message)
Kate Bush--Aerial--tune #3-Bertie (1 message)
Kirnberger III a complete fake? (19 messages)
Kirnberger sources (1 message)
Kirnberger to bed (1 message)
kit builder request (1 message)
L-Soft Inc and The Listserv Appearanc (4 messages)
Labeques fp - was Angela Hewitt Bach (1 message)
Le Gallois lettre (1 message)
List affected (1 message)
Listserv upgrade (1 message)
Loopy Loops (1 message)
loopy loops, (10 messages)
manzanita & other natural decorative materials (1 message)
Marpurg 1790 - a sample (9 messages)
Marpurg, tuning (1 message)
McNulty e-mail? (1 message)
Melodic schlelodic (1 message)
metaphors was Headphones (1 message)
metaphors2 was Headphones (1 message)
Microfilm prices? (2 messages)
mietke plan was Ordering from Vogel (2 messages)
more on tuning hammers (1 message)
Mozart and no end (2 messages)
Mozart on the Harpsichord (11 messages)
Mozart's Birthday (1 message)
Mozart's personal catalog of works goes on-line (2 messages)
Musing on diverse kanons (8 messages)
New member (15 messages)
new organ and harpsichord recordings released (3 messages)
New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse! (18 messages)
new web interface OT, but frustrated. (16 messages)
Nodding off (15 messages)
Notice: Stalker and Parker available (6 messages)
NYC concert announcement (1 message)
Observations on Chronik der Anna Magalena Bach (3 messages)
Old Bach arrived in the form of an unusually large bug (1 message)
Old Z. tuning hammers (1 message)
Orchestral Temperaments (2 messages)
Ordering from Vogel (12 messages)
Organ recitals Buxtehude etc. Was: History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord (1 message)
OT - Acoustical Society of America - Fish Love Songs (5 messages)
OT Mozart's birthday minus one (1 message)
Pau Santo- Santo Wood (1 message)
perceived defects of early keyboard instruments (1 message)
perceived defects of early keyboard instruments - was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach (5 messages)
pins etc (3 messages)
plank boring (1 message)
Problems with new web interface (3 messages)
Programming the MT-1200 (6 messages)
Progress report on the Z-Box (3 messages)
Purcell for beginners (3 messages)
Re.Hole (1 message)
recent O-T thread (1 message)
Roland Digitals... (3 messages)
sanding/planing jacks (3 messages)
Saw this for sale (1 message)
Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull (8 messages)
scraper sharpening (12 messages)
Siberian sounds (1 message)
sins of the fathers (2 messages)
specific gravity (2 messages)
specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper (25 messages)
Spinoza bulletin (was: stoic intellectial credo) (1 message)
Square (8 messages)
Squishing bentsides (1 message)
stable woods, was jack taper (5 messages)
steps forward (1 message)
sticking jacks (4 messages)
stoic intellectial credo (1 message)
stoic intellectial credo was graverobbing Scientists (2 messages)
tapered jacks & such (2 messages)
Taskin tapered jacks (6 messages)
Thanks... (1 message)
The Listserve Appearance (5 messages)
The solution to the intruder (1 message)
The Ultimate in Ephemera (2 messages)
Total string tension (1 message)
Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch (6 messages)
Tuma's Goldberg Variations (1 message)
Tuning hammers (1 message)
Tuning the irregular Kirnbergers by ear (5 messages)
turde harpsichords (4 messages)
typische bloedheit was Marpurg 1790 - a sample (1 message)
Vater and low so-called French pitch. (2 messages)
Vater at French pitch (7 messages)
Werckbetter (1 message)
Werckmeister 3 by ear (1 message)
Wikipedia (wasinegale/temperaments) (5 messages)
wound bass strings (1 message)
Wound strings attached to straight strings? (15 messages)
Young #1 (6 messages)
Z-Box tuning question (3 messages)
Zuckerman parts (4 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

'tis V

'tis V

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:54:15 -0500

68 lines

New Thread

*********** new web interface OT, but frustrated.

*********** new web interface OT, but frustrated.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:04:08 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

01/28/06 Change of email address

01/28/06 Change of email address

Michael Roberts <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:13:25 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

1 step forward and 2 steps back; was B major

1 step forward and 2 steps back; was B major

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:24:15 -0500

41 lines

Re: 1 step forward and 2 steps back; was B major

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:33:44 -0500

45 lines

Re: 1 step forward and 2 steps back; was B major

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:26:30 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

1745 Dulcken design pitch

1745 Dulcken design pitch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 16:39:45 -0800

31 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 01:58:13 -0500

14 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:59:52 +0100

33 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 14:37:28 +0200

29 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:31:57 -0800

32 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:42:45 -0800

48 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:58:55 +0100

32 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 13:49:09 -0800

41 lines

Re: 1745 Dulcken design pitch

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:21:31 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:52:40 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

A question for Redstone ...

A question for Redstone ...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:44:27 -0500

31 lines

Re: A question for Redstone ...

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:25:00 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

A question for Redstone ...viols

Re: A question for Redstone ...viols

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:16:49 -0500

65 lines

Re: A question for Redstone ...viols

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:01:19 +0400

92 lines

Re: A question for Redstone ...viols

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 17:39:27 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

A question for the chemists

A question for the chemists

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 16:04:33 -0800

44 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:42:06 +0200

35 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:52:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:06:37 -0500

67 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:36:37 -0800

25 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

Jim McFarland <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:59:31 -0500

48 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:37:42 -0500

33 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:57:48 +0400

56 lines

Re: A question for the chemists

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:11:43 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Addresses Needed

Addresses Needed

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:14:46 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

African or European swallow?

African or European swallow?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:09:42 -0500

27 lines

Re: African or European swallow?

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 10:03:36 -0600

55 lines

Re: African or European swallow?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:18:12 -0500

34 lines

Re: African or European swallow?

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:43:27 -0600

64 lines

Re: African or European swallow?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:25:04 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

African or European swallow? (really Vallotti/Young)

African or European swallow? (really Vallotti/Young)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:01:16 -0500

78 lines

Re: African or European swallow? (really Vallotti/Young)

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 11:16:55 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Angela Hewitt Bach

Angela Hewitt Bach

Robin Bigwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:27:27 +0000

19 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:28:50 +1000

42 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:17:29 -0800

73 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:30:37 +0100

22 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:10:26 -0600

33 lines

Angela Hewitt Bach

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:48:52 +0100

56 lines

Angela Hewitt Bach

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 21:07:14 +0100

50 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:17:46 -0800

47 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 05:48:30 +0000

24 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:12:27 -0500

34 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:27:18 -0500

20 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:59:45 -0500

39 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 19:33:39 -0600

29 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 20:07:23 -0600

32 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:22:21 -0500

34 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:41:52 -0500

20 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 07:08:44 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Angela Hewitt Bach/EEeew!

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach/EEeew!

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 15:36:21 -0500

63 lines

Re: Angela Hewitt Bach/EEeew!

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 16:19:10 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

apology, was Marpurg 1790 - a sample

apology, was Marpurg 1790 - a sample

martin puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:50:39 +0100

29 lines

Re: apology, was Marpurg 1790 - a sample

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 06:28:31 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Archives?

Archives?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 05:57:34 -0800

23 lines

Re: Archives?

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 15:40:27 -0500

175 lines

New Thread

arithmetically faked roots

arithmetically faked roots

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:40:52 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

attn. dennis

attn. dennis

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:26:36 +0200

30 lines

Re: attn. dennis

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:44:48 -0800

20 lines

Re: attn. dennis

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:18:00 +0100

18 lines

Re: attn. dennis

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:06:33 +0200

26 lines

Re: attn. dennis

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 07:05:11 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

B major

B major

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:12:48 -0500

38 lines

Re: B major

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:46:27 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Bachaus Harpsichord

Bachaus Harpsichord

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:47:20 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Bachhaus harpsichord

Bachhaus harpsichord

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:02:57 -0800

79 lines

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:19:16 -0500

21 lines

Re: Bachhaus Harpsichord

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 01:15:39 +0200

25 lines

Re: Bachhaus Harpsichord

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:44:58 +1000

23 lines

Re: Bachhaus Harpsichord

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 08:22:42 +0100

35 lines

Re: Bachhaus Harpsichord

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

17 lines

Re: Bachhaus Harpsichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 10:01:18 +0100

31 lines

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord

martin puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 15:42:58 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Bachhaus Harpsichord - harder to play

Re: Bachhaus Harpsichord - harder to play

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

16 lines

New Thread

Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:51:40 -0800

59 lines

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:03:10 +0400

26 lines

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 19:36:13 -0600

30 lines

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 09:33:41 -0500

15 lines

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 10:01:22 -0500

48 lines

Re: Bachhaus harpsichord RECONSTRUCTIONS

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:08:57 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Bob van Asperen's French Suites

Re: Bob van Asperen's French Suites

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 11:00:58 -0600

28 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen's French Suites

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:22:46 +0100

19 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen's French Suites

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 12:30:30 -0600

30 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen's French Suites

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:06:45 +0100

41 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen's French Suites

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 05:59:44 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

Books bound in human skin... what next?

Books bound in human skin... what next?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:23 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

Bose noise-cancelling 'phones

Bose noise-cancelling 'phones

Bruce Behnke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 21:20:52 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Brass vs. iron

Brass vs. iron

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 03:58:38 -0500

42 lines

Re: Brass vs. iron

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 09:05:09 -0700

40 lines

New Thread

Brass vs. iron BUT EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Re: Brass vs. iron BUT EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:24:38 -0700

52 lines

Re: Brass vs. iron BUT EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:44:27 -0500

80 lines

Re: Brass vs. iron BUT EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:02:01 -0700

100 lines

New Thread

Brass vs. iron: MISATTRIBUTION

Re: Brass vs. iron: MISATTRIBUTION

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:23:27 -0700

73 lines

New Thread

brass wires of the world

brass wires of the world

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:20:18 +0200

23 lines

Re: brass wires of the world

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:02:00 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

Casanova film 1753 Venice

Casanova film 1753 Venice

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 17:45:21 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

charm

charm

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 23:27:18 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

clathrates

clathrates

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:08:16 -0600

39 lines

Re: clathrates

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 14:04:24 +0200

51 lines

Re: clathrates

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 19:08:42 +0100

40 lines

Re: clathrates

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 22:05:48 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Clavichords in Japan, was: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments

Clavichords in Japan, was: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:36:47 -0000

31 lines

Re: Clavichords in Japan, was: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:23:36 +0400

38 lines

New Thread

Clavier

Clavier

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:30:36 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:35:06 +0200

49 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:52:27 -0000

50 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 16:05:31 +0200

30 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 10:04:31 -0500

72 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:10:57 -0000

37 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:14:11 +0200

23 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:10:12 -0500

52 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:09:48 +0200

57 lines

Re: conceived - was perceived - defects of instruments

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 02:12:33 +0400

38 lines

New Thread

Concert Sunday in Boston -- lotsa'nachronisms

Concert Sunday in Boston -- lotsa'nachronisms

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:23:11 -0500

140 lines

Re: Concert Sunday in Boston -- lotsa'nachronisms

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 17:30:48 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Creative organology

Creative organology

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:50:50 -0500

24 lines

Re: Creative organology

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:55:52 -0600

44 lines

Re: Creative organology

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:22:04 -0500

24 lines

Re: Creative organology

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

39 lines

Re: Creative organology

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:58:08 -0500

25 lines

Re: Creative organology

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

37 lines

New Thread

Damper cloth was Nodding off

Damper cloth was Nodding off

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:38:14 -0800

26 lines

Re: Damper cloth was Nodding off

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:36:41 +0100

26 lines

Re: Damper cloth was Nodding off

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:57:37 -0800

36 lines

Re: Damper cloth was Nodding off

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 15:16:34 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Damping, was diatribe

Damping, was diatribe

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 21:31:58 +0100

33 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 14:43:11 -0700

72 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:10:52 -0800

112 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:42:41 -0700

126 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:50:38 -0800

20 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:40:12 -0700

29 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:59:32 +1000

66 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:18:29 +0400

29 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 06:23:14 +0100

24 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:17:08 +0100

48 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:24:22 +0000

24 lines

Re: Damping, was diatribe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:41:50 +0400

41 lines

New Thread

Danzil's treatise

Danzil's treatise

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:54:54 -0500

24 lines

Re: Danzil's treatise

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:23:50 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

dentists who tune keyboards

dentists who tune keyboards

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:20:09 -0500

92 lines

Re: dentists who tune keyboards

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:02:30 +0000

41 lines

Re: dentists who tune keyboards

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:20:48 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Dependence on foreign oil is at an end?

Dependence on foreign oil is at an end?

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 19:41:54 -0500

22 lines

Re: Dependence on foreign oil is at an end?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 22:27:22 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Dulcken gap repair

Dulcken gap repair

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 06:13:13 -0800

17 lines

Re: Dulcken gap repair

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 07:07:49 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

Dulcken gap repair again

Re: Dulcken gap repair again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:33:52 +0000

41 lines

Re: Dulcken gap repair again

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:21:46 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Dulcken gap repair LONG NOTE

Re: Dulcken gap repair LONG NOTE

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 10:34:54 +1000

79 lines

Re: Dulcken gap repair LONG NOTE

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:51:24 +0100

62 lines

Re: Dulcken gap repair LONG NOTE

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

13 lines

Re: Dulcken gap repair LONG NOTE

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:30:35 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

E minor

E minor

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:14:50 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

Earlie computer game

Earlie computer game

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:00:11 -0600

18 lines

Re: Earlie computer game

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 01:51:52 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Early Fepo, was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Early Fepo, was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 22:24:23 -0500

28 lines

Re: Early Fepo, was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 02:48:34 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Electronic tuner pickup

Electronic tuner pickup

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:45:30 -0500

15 lines

Re: Electronic tuner pickup

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:57:42 -0800

27 lines

Re: Electronic tuner pickup

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:45:54 +0000

34 lines

Re: Electronic tuner pickup

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:33:44 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Re: EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 18:12:17 -0500

117 lines

Re: EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:17:35 -0800

26 lines

Re: EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:48:59 -0500

47 lines

Re: EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:16:15 +0100

21 lines

Re: EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:00:43 -0500

19 lines

Re: EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:24:11 -0700

36 lines

Re: EMAIL, AND QUOTE, NOT FROM ME!

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:41:23 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

English -> French translation needed - PAID!

English -> French translation needed - PAID!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:47:07 -0500

31 lines

Re: English -> French translation needed - PAID!

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:39:14 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

favorite Mozart quotes

favorite Mozart quotes

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:09:26 -0500

20 lines

Re: favorite Mozart quotes

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 20:18:06 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

files

files

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:59:58 +0200

14 lines

Re: files

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:57:17 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:00:41 -0700

158 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 11:32:46 +0100

238 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 09:34:55 -0600

25 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:56:49 -0700

106 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:27:56 +0100

17 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:01:41 +0100

299 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:09:40 -0700

33 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:02:39 -0800

76 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:03:22 -0500

63 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Nick Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 12:15:25 -0800

50 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:38:33 -0500

41 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 15:41:59 -0500

25 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:16:17 +0100

16 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:02:20 -0500

39 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:22:43 +0100

35 lines

Re: Fingering, Expression, and HIP diatribe

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:29:56 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

flag-poling clarification

flag-poling clarification

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 12:47:52 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

flagpoling?

flagpoling?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 12:31:26 +0000

21 lines

Re: flagpoling?

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 10:20:40 -0600

49 lines

Re: flagpoling?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 23:35:49 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

footnote

footnote

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:15:34 -0800

10 lines

New Thread

Friction in jack guides (corners)

Friction in jack guides (corners)

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 06:48:22 -0800

55 lines

Re: Friction in jack guides (corners)

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:48:55 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Fw: CIMCIM-L: Important Acquisition by the University of Edinburgh

Fw: CIMCIM-L: Important Acquisition by the University of Edinburgh

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 19:52:34 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Fw: Re: new soundtrackINFO correction posted

Fw: Re: new soundtrackINFO correction posted

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 18:50:24 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Fw: [HPSCHD-L] Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

Fw: [HPSCHD-L] Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

58 lines

New Thread

geometric 5ths (any reasonable size) by ear

geometric 5ths (any reasonable size) by ear

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:55:47 -0500

75 lines

New Thread

gift wood

gift wood

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:27:09 -0800

16 lines

New Thread

Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Re: Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:26:47 -0500

38 lines

Re: Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 20:54:25 -0500

36 lines

Re: Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 21:02:48 -0500

25 lines

Re: Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 03:37:27 -0500

72 lines

Re: Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:22:00 -0500

28 lines

Re: Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:31:09 -0500

44 lines

Re: Global warming and rare wood and etc.

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 04:45:40 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Gluers!

Gluers!

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

13 lines

New Thread

Grrr!

Grrr!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 02:45:51 +0000

15 lines

Re: Grrr!

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:27:02 -0500

34 lines

Re: Grrr!

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:35:18 -0800

64 lines

Re: Grrr!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 08:46:28 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

Happy Birthday Mozart!

Happy Birthday Mozart!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:09:19 +0100

25 lines

Re: Happy Birthday Mozart!

Philip Bayles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:42:39 -0800

38 lines

Re: Happy Birthday Mozart!

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:17:15 +0100

29 lines

Re: Happy Birthday Mozart!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:01:43 +0100

25 lines

Re: Happy Birthday Mozart!

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:33:24 -0500

28 lines

Re: Happy Birthday Mozart!

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:44:21 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Happy Birthday Mozart! 1-27-1756

Re: Happy Birthday Mozart! 1-27-1756

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:25:51 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Happy New Year!

Happy New Year!

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jan 2006 01:20:28 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Hardness of Tuning Pins

Hardness of Tuning Pins

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:05:29 -0500

13 lines

Re: Hardness of Tuning Pins

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:32:42 -0500

29 lines

Re: Hardness of Tuning Pins

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 14:38:24 -0500

34 lines

Re: Hardness of Tuning Pins

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 18:03:06 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Moving

Re: Harpsichord Moving

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:39:35 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord workshop in San Antonio february 24-26 with Richard Egarr

Harpsichord workshop in San Antonio february 24-26 with Richard Egarr

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 22:16:42 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

Headphones

Headphones

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

17 lines

Re: Headphones

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:45:18 +0100

28 lines

Re: Headphones

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:17:14 -0600

24 lines

Re: Headphones

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:18:54 -0500

12 lines

Re: Headphones

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:54:42 +0100

15 lines

Re: Headphones

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:34:04 -0500

17 lines

Re: Headphones

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:07:01 +1000

46 lines

Re: Headphones

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:59:52 +0100

22 lines

Re: Headphones

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

67 lines

Re: Headphones

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:33:38 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

Gerald T. Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 18:35:49 -0500

23 lines

Re: Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 22:38:56 -0500

33 lines

Re: Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:34:07 -0500

25 lines

Re: Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:31:07 +0000

39 lines

Re: Historic Instrument and Ruckers Book

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:59:47 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:25:41 +0100

34 lines

Re: History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:21:14 -0500

38 lines

Re: History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:36:56 +0100

25 lines

Re: History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:09:17 -0500

40 lines

Re: History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:31:34 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:57:16 -0500

40 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:10:01 -0800

51 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:38:00 -0800

89 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:16:28 -0500

99 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:09:43 -0500

17 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:15:38 -0500

26 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:41:11 -0500

16 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 17:44:10 -0800

74 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:33:17 +1000

43 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:35:24 -0600

68 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 10:41:21 +0100

42 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:04:56 -0500

35 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 12:30:36 -0500

18 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 01:32:06 +0400

39 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 18:10:44 -0800

52 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:01:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:31:34 +0400

33 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:42:18 -0800

29 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:42:20 -0500

24 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:21:05 +0400

38 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:40:46 -0500

17 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:48:45 -0500

42 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:20:14 -0500

19 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 04:43:22 +0400

33 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 08:57:39 -0800

28 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 13:28:33 -0500

32 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 16:48:54 -0500

28 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 07:06:13 +0000

33 lines

Re: Hitch pin loops in brass strings - Help?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 10:03:09 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Holes

Holes

Fred Craven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:49:04 -0600

24 lines

Re: Holes

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:17:09 -0500

26 lines

Re: Holes

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:26:53 -0500

26 lines

Re: Holes

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 11:47:27 -0500

26 lines

Re: Holes

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 08:51:55 -0800

68 lines

Re: Holes

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:02:36 -0800

36 lines

Re: Holes

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:33:40 -0500

31 lines

Re: Holes

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 09:55:19 -0800

45 lines

Re: Holes

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 20:50:07 +0100

53 lines

Re: Holes

Lance Monttfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:18:36 -0800

46 lines

Re: Holes

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 00:38:10 +0400

40 lines

Re: Holes

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 15:57:57 -0500

23 lines

Re: Holes

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:30:34 -0500

23 lines

Re: Holes

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Dec 2005 21:44:01 +0000

58 lines

Re: Holes

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 17:21:04 -0500

76 lines

Re: Holes

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Dec 2005 22:51:04 +0000

26 lines

Re: Holes

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:56:49 -0500

22 lines

Re: Holes

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:41:53 +0400

97 lines

Re: Holes

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 07:53:39 +0100

129 lines

Re: Holes

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 06:04:29 -0800

23 lines

Re: Holes

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:10:26 -0500

27 lines

Re: Holes

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:26:30 -0600

49 lines

Re: Holes

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:00:42 -0800

78 lines

Re: Holes

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:35:11 -0500

31 lines

Re: Holes

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:54:55 -0500

24 lines

Re: Holes

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:09:47 -0800

25 lines

Re: Holes

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 12:57:29 -0800

39 lines

Re: Holes

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:25:19 -0500

30 lines

Re: Holes

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 19:28:01 -0600

58 lines

Holes

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:50:03 +1030

30 lines

Re: Holes

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 20:38:35 -0600

99 lines

Re: Holes

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 12:33:10 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

Holey moley

Holey moley

Fred Craven <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 17:21:23 -0600

31 lines

Re: Holey moley

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 02:21:43 +0200

33 lines

Re: Holey moley

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:50:44 +1000

53 lines

Re: Holey moley

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 06:46:17 +0000

29 lines

Re: Holey moley

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:27:29 +0100

100 lines

Re: Holey moley

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:49:51 +0100

41 lines

Re: Holey moley

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:59:58 -0000

32 lines

Re: Holey moley

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

16 lines

Re: Holey moley

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:28:23 +0100

19 lines

Re: Holey moley

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:37:51 +0100

20 lines

Re: Holey moley

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:57:31 +0200

33 lines

Re: Holey moley

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:38:48 +0000

43 lines

Re: Holey moley

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:42:39 +0100

55 lines

Re: Holey moley

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 23:02:58 +4813

28 lines

Re: Holey moley

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:25:39 -0800

71 lines

Re: Holey moley

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 09:31:43 -0800

30 lines

Re: Holey moley

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 18:00:10 +0000

44 lines

Re: Holey moley

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 20:49:04 +0200

57 lines

Re: Holey moley

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:31:25 -0800

41 lines

Re: Holey moley

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:27:27 +0200

26 lines

Re: Holey moley

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:08:56 +0100

22 lines

Re: Holey moley

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 14:11:46 -0600

91 lines

Re: Holey moley

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 13:24:33 -0800

69 lines

Re: Holey moley

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 02:11:27 +0200

20 lines

Re: Holey moley

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 05:06:16 +0400

32 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Jan 2006 to 23 Jan 2006 (#2006-22)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Jan 2006 to 23 Jan 2006 (#2006-22)

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:05:16 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

I'm not a Luddite. Really, I'm not.

I'm not a Luddite. Really, I'm not.

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 18:13:27 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

ideal citizen was attn. chemists

ideal citizen was attn. chemists

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 18:23:46 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

inegale

inegale

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 19:02:51 -0800

30 lines

Re: inegale

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:27:32 -0700

41 lines

Re: inegale

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 21:59:11 -0800

58 lines

Re: inegale

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:18:11 -0700

73 lines

Re: inegale

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:59:51 -0500

75 lines

Re: inegale

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 14:07:51 -0700

105 lines

Re: inegale

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:23:30 -0500

27 lines

Re: inegale

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:57:46 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

inegale/temperaments

Re: inegale/temperaments

Noel Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 20:31:04 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

INSIPID PITCH

INSIPID PITCH

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:23:42 -0800

51 lines

Re: INSIPID PITCH

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:00:42 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

International moving

International moving

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:44:48 -0600

39 lines

Re: International moving

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:28:02 +0000

60 lines

New Thread

Intruder alert!

Intruder alert!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:48:45 -0500

18 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:13:07 -0500

41 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:43:03 -0500

41 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:06:24 -0500

26 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:01:10 -0500

29 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Feb 2006 04:15:38 +0400

65 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:30:14 EST

28 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 19:33:28 -0500

33 lines

Re: Intruder alert!

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 18:38:57 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:49:39 -0600

24 lines

Re: IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:26:43 +0200

17 lines

Re: IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 04:44:19 -0500

23 lines

Re: IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:04:54 +0200

25 lines

Re: IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

Jane Haddam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 06:09:32 EST

33 lines

Re: IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:10:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:27:39 -0500

68 lines

Re: IQ test (was: Marpurg 1790 - a sample)

Jane Haddam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 15:30:24 EST

23 lines

New Thread

IQ test + maple

Re: IQ test + maple

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 14:25:08 +0200

49 lines

Re: IQ test + maple

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 12:57:58 +0100

19 lines

Re: IQ test + maple

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 08:43:40 -0800

37 lines

Re: IQ test + maple

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

62 lines

New Thread

Italian speech was Damping was diatribe

Italian speech was Damping was diatribe

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 03:30:04 +0200

38 lines

Re: Italian speech was Damping was diatribe

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:17:51 -0800

17 lines

Re: Italian speech was Damping was diatribe

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:46:40 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

its HIP to be square

its HIP to be square

Andrew & Diana Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 22:06:36 +1000

28 lines

New Thread

Jack's Dulcken projuct

Jack's Dulcken projuct

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 02:23:33 +0200

13 lines

New Thread

Jacks again

Jacks again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 21:59:20 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

Jones-Clayton jacks

Jones-Clayton jacks

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 21:14:37 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Kate Bush--Aerial--tune #3-Bertie

Kate Bush--Aerial--tune #3-Bertie

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:24:33 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 12:17:23 -0500

38 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 21:37:42 +0100

37 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:12:10 -0500

30 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:24:43 -0500

39 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 08:01:25 +0100

30 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 02:50:50 -0500

38 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 09:54:50 +0100

27 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 16:47:19 +0100

22 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 19:08:59 +0100

23 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 15:35:43 -0500

34 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:51:26 +0400

30 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:37:45 +0000

27 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 08:27:54 +0100

21 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:32:25 -0500

34 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:25:27 -0500

42 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 13:45:37 +0100

37 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 06:55:38 -0600

23 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 16:11:26 +0200

22 lines

Re: Kirnberger III a complete fake?

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 23:52:08 -0800

14 lines

New Thread

Kirnberger sources

Kirnberger sources

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 02:38:42 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Kirnberger to bed

Kirnberger to bed

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:00:20 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

kit builder request

kit builder request

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:17:26 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

L-Soft Inc and The Listserv Appearanc

L-Soft Inc and The Listserv Appearanc

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 13:32:54 +0200

20 lines

Re: L-Soft Inc and The Listserv Appearanc

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

27 lines

Re: L-Soft Inc and The Listserv Appearanc

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:18:31 -0500

28 lines

Re: L-Soft Inc and The Listserv Appearanc

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:33:07 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Labeques fp - was Angela Hewitt Bach

Labeques fp - was Angela Hewitt Bach

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:25:42 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Le Gallois lettre

Le Gallois lettre

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 13:25:01 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

List affected

List affected

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:54:39 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Listserv upgrade

Listserv upgrade

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 09:44:02 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

Loopy Loops

Re: Loopy Loops

GEORGE CANDLER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 01:29:11 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

loopy loops,

loopy loops,

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 00:35:37 -0800

17 lines

Re: loopy loops,

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 12:31:09 +0100

30 lines

Re: loopy loops,

Lance Monttfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 06:41:02 -0800

47 lines

Re: loopy loops,

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:59:11 EST

24 lines

Re: loopy loops,

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 19:15:02 +0100

21 lines

Re: loopy loops,

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 03:52:38 +0000

36 lines

Re: loopy loops,

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:27:18 -0800

25 lines

Re: loopy loops,

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:39:27 -0800

47 lines

Re: loopy loops,

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:59:10 -0500

19 lines

Re: loopy loops,

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 11:00:26 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

manzanita & other natural decorative materials

manzanita & other natural decorative materials

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 03:43:44 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

Marpurg 1790 - a sample

Marpurg 1790 - a sample

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 18:48:56 +0100

24 lines

Re: Marpurg 1790 - a sample

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:09:41 -0500

29 lines

Re: Marpurg 1790 - a sample

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:03:42 -0800

42 lines

Marpurg 1790 - a sample

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:17:47 +0100

54 lines

Re: Marpurg 1790 - a sample

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:27:08 -0500

27 lines

Re: Marpurg 1790 - a sample

martin puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:47:40 +0100

17 lines

Re: Marpurg 1790 - a sample

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:06:14 -0600

25 lines

Re: Marpurg 1790 - a sample

martin puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 11:48:47 +0100

22 lines

Re: Marpurg 1790 - a sample

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 13:48:23 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Marpurg, tuning

Marpurg, tuning

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 21:02:23 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

McNulty e-mail?

McNulty e-mail?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:50:49 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Melodic schlelodic

Melodic schlelodic

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 15:48:35 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

metaphors was Headphones

metaphors was Headphones

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:03:45 +0200

22 lines

New Thread

metaphors2 was Headphones

metaphors2 was Headphones

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:30:48 +0200

20 lines

New Thread

Microfilm prices?

Microfilm prices?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 13:26:09 -0800

20 lines

Re: Microfilm prices?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:11:07 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

mietke plan was Ordering from Vogel

mietke plan was Ordering from Vogel

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 18:26:00 +0200

19 lines

Re: mietke plan was Ordering from Vogel

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:56:07 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

more on tuning hammers

more on tuning hammers

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:58:11 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Mozart and no end

Mozart and no end

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:59:37 +0100

15 lines

Re: Mozart and no end

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 22:04:15 +0200

52 lines

New Thread

Mozart on the Harpsichord

Mozart on the Harpsichord

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:09:32 +0100

28 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 19:10:07 -0500

44 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 03:18:09 +0200

24 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:06:45 -0500

62 lines

Mozart on the Harpsichord

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:10:20 +0100

34 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:28:40 +0200

24 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:56:56 -0500

59 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 00:13:09 -0500

24 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:12:28 +0400

28 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 16:31:37 -0500

29 lines

Re: Mozart on the Harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 04:17:26 +0400

44 lines

New Thread

Mozart's Birthday

Mozart's Birthday

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:00:04 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Mozart's personal catalog of works goes on-line

Mozart's personal catalog of works goes on-line

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:31:10 -0500

7 lines

Re: Mozart's personal catalog of works goes on-line

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:16:57 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Musing on diverse kanons

Musing on diverse kanons

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:49:51 -0500

29 lines

Re: Musing on diverse kanons

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 05:37:45 -0500

60 lines

Re: Musing on diverse kanons

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 05:49:54 -0500

67 lines

Re: Musing on diverse kanons

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:49:03 +0100

44 lines

Re: Musing on diverse kanons

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:31:44 -0500

46 lines

Re: Musing on diverse kanons

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:20:32 +0100

21 lines

Re: Musing on diverse kanons

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 17:29:11 +0100

23 lines

Re: Musing on diverse kanons

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 03:47:10 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

New member

New member

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 13:51:02 -0500

28 lines

Re: New member

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 11:35:59 -0800

38 lines

Re: New member

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 15:54:13 -0500

12 lines

Re: New member

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 16:52:42 -0500

23 lines

Re: New member

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 22:53:53 +0100

27 lines

Re: New member

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 17:01:05 -0500

26 lines

Re: New member

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 14:21:44 -0800

25 lines

Re: New member

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:13:53 -0500

15 lines

Re: New member

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 19:18:18 -0500

9 lines

Re: New member

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Jan 2006 23:00:47 -0800

23 lines

Re: New member

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 04:01:17 -0500

45 lines

Re: New member

Charles <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:56:57 +0100

41 lines

Re: New member

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 13:22:36 -0800

43 lines

Re: New member

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 21:47:28 +0000

19 lines

Re: New member

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 18:04:40 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

new organ and harpsichord recordings released

new organ and harpsichord recordings released

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 18:17:10 -0500

74 lines

Re: new organ and harpsichord recordings released

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:09:03 -0800

31 lines

Re: new organ and harpsichord recordings released

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 09:24:25 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 09:16:18 -0500

56 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 14:06:45 -0500

20 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 01:18:43 +0400

69 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:02:55 -0500

20 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Jan 2006 21:31:56 -0500

23 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 08:57:08 +0400

41 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 09:01:12 -0500

110 lines

New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:37:07 +0100

77 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:38:48 +0400

37 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 22:47:24 -0700

29 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:19:18 -0500

66 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:01:13 +0100

21 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:20:20 -0500

53 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:30:36 +0100

35 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:44:14 -0500

47 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 05:04:57 +0200

26 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 23:16:59 -0500

21 lines

Re: New proof: the cart really does belong in front of the horse!

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 22:50:06 -0600

59 lines

New Thread

new web interface OT, but frustrated.

new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:40:21 -0500

12 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 23:27:17 -0500

35 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 15:38:06 +0000

31 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 07:57:01 -0800

80 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

dc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:10:28 +0100

16 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 08:10:27 -0800

26 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 13:17:44 -0500

30 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 19:39:46 +0100

17 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 11:14:52 -0800

33 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 14:39:41 -0500

58 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 20:40:47 +0100

30 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 12:08:39 -0800

29 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 17:58:29 -0500

48 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 03:01:41 -0500

31 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 12:14:28 -0500

22 lines

Re: new web interface OT, but frustrated.

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 09:11:38 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Nodding off

Nodding off

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:21:27 -0500

37 lines

Re: Nodding off

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 16:13:32 +0000

37 lines

Re: Nodding off

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 19:27:45 +0100

17 lines

Re: Nodding off

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 14:12:47 -0500

45 lines

Re: Nodding off

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:20:01 -0800

106 lines

Re: Nodding off

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 20:59:14 +0000

31 lines

Re: Nodding off

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

39 lines

Re: Nodding off

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 06:47:13 +0100

46 lines

Re: Nodding off

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:04:10 +0100

71 lines

Re: Nodding off

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 11:02:55 -0500

26 lines

Re: Nodding off

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 08:51:42 -0800

53 lines

Re: Nodding off

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 09:00:26 -0800

28 lines

Re: Nodding off

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 17:01:57 +0000

22 lines

Re: Nodding off

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:48:57 -0500

46 lines

Re: Nodding off

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 14:55:25 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

Notice: Stalker and Parker available

Notice: Stalker and Parker available

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 10:56:11 -0800

57 lines

Re: Notice: Stalker and Parker available

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:35:45 +0200

17 lines

Re: Notice: Stalker and Parker available

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 11:41:36 -0800

28 lines

Re: Notice: Stalker and Parker available

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 21:08:54 +0100

30 lines

Re: Notice: Stalker and Parker available

martin puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:15:21 +0100

30 lines

Re: Notice: Stalker and Parker available

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 12:37:48 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

NYC concert announcement

NYC concert announcement

Bruce Garetz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:44:43 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Observations on Chronik der Anna Magalena Bach

Observations on Chronik der Anna Magalena Bach

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 05:45:29 -0600

38 lines

Re: Observations on Chronik der Anna Magalena Bach

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Jan 2006 23:03:19 +0100

24 lines

Re: Observations on Chronik der Anna Magalena Bach

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 19:31:49 +0400

41 lines

New Thread

Old Bach arrived in the form of an unusually large bug

Old Bach arrived in the form of an unusually large bug

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 17:53:41 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Old Z. tuning hammers

Re: Old Z. tuning hammers

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:20:48 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Orchestral Temperaments

Orchestral Temperaments

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:38:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: Orchestral Temperaments

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:44:29 -0000

14 lines

New Thread

Ordering from Vogel

Ordering from Vogel

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 19:13:12 -0500

18 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 16:46:40 -0800

35 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 20:21:43 -0500

54 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 22:23:20 -0500

40 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:46:11 +0100

20 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:09:21 +0000

37 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 07:30:25 -0500

10 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 09:17:20 -0800

86 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

Seth Hensel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 13:59:29 -0500

98 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 10:27:02 +1030

12 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:50:16 -0600

33 lines

Re: Ordering from Vogel

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Jan 2006 07:26:42 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Organ recitals Buxtehude etc. Was: History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

Organ recitals Buxtehude etc. Was: History of 'recitals' - was Mozart on the Harpsichord

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 10:39:20 +0100

149 lines

New Thread

OT - Acoustical Society of America - Fish Love Songs

OT - Acoustical Society of America - Fish Love Songs

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 19:01:13 +0100

20 lines

Re: OT - Acoustical Society of America - Fish Love Songs

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 15:57:41 -0500

54 lines

Re: OT - Acoustical Society of America - Fish Love Songs

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:02:41 -0500

20 lines

Re: OT - Acoustical Society of America - Fish Love Songs

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 20:21:40 -0500

30 lines

OT - Acoustical Society of America - Fish Love Songs

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 16:06:00 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

OT Mozart's birthday minus one

OT Mozart's birthday minus one

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:08:52 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

Pau Santo- Santo Wood

Pau Santo- Santo Wood

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 05:14:23 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

perceived defects of early keyboard instruments

Re: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 05:47:33 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

perceived defects of early keyboard instruments - was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

perceived defects of early keyboard instruments - was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 11:23:59 +0100

98 lines

Re: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments - was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 14:24:39 -0500

51 lines

Re: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments - was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Beth Garfinkel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 15:26:47 -0500

22 lines

Re: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments - was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 01:50:01 +0400

86 lines

Re: perceived defects of early keyboard instruments - was Re: Angela Hewitt Bach

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 10:21:00 -0000

35 lines

New Thread

pins etc

pins etc

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 10:38:16 +1100

11 lines

Re: pins etc

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 16:00:13 -0800

36 lines

Re: pins etc

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 08:44:43 +0400

30 lines

New Thread

plank boring

plank boring

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 10:03:46 +0000

35 lines

New Thread

Problems with new web interface

Problems with new web interface

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 06:04:59 -0500

30 lines

Re: Problems with new web interface

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:33:48 +0100

15 lines

Re: Problems with new web interface

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:23:50 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Programming the MT-1200

Programming the MT-1200

Keith Womer <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:45:58 -0600

20 lines

Re: Programming the MT-1200

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 15:27:59 -0500

56 lines

Re: Programming the MT-1200

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:15:11 -0500

17 lines

Re: Programming the MT-1200

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:05:11 -0500

30 lines

Re: Programming the MT-1200

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 04:11:36 -0500

36 lines

Re: Programming the MT-1200

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:41:27 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Progress report on the Z-Box

Progress report on the Z-Box

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 16:45:13 -0500

25 lines

Re: Progress report on the Z-Box

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:06:12 -0800

36 lines

Re: Progress report on the Z-Box

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 06:51:58 +0000

20 lines

New Thread

Purcell for beginners

Purcell for beginners

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 14:53:40 +0100

37 lines

Re: Purcell for beginners

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 11:48:32 -0500

24 lines

Re: Purcell for beginners

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 18:54:34 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Re.Hole

Re.Hole

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 14:50:48 +1030

12 lines

New Thread

recent O-T thread

recent O-T thread

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:01:17 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

Roland Digitals...

Re: Roland Digitals...

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jan 2006 08:36:22 +0100

35 lines

Re: Roland Digitals...

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Jan 2006 09:00:52 -0500

33 lines

Re: Roland Digitals...

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Jan 2006 00:58:41 +0400

42 lines

New Thread

sanding/planing jacks

sanding/planing jacks

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 13:11:46 +0000

28 lines

Re: sanding/planing jacks

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:23:01 +0200

19 lines

Re: sanding/planing jacks

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 09:03:43 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Saw this for sale

Saw this for sale

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 01:22:00 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 16:45:36 -0500

89 lines

Re: Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 03:39:52 +0200

25 lines

Re: Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 21:45:05 -0500

44 lines

Re: Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 00:23:05 +0100

30 lines

Re: Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 02:51:43 +0200

36 lines

Re: Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

Zachary <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 02:03:22 -0500

35 lines

Re: Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Jan 2006 08:41:23 -0700

63 lines

Re: Scientists May Have Found Mozart's Skull

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 17:30:11 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

scraper sharpening

scraper sharpening

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 20:12:59 +0000

31 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 02:54:40 +0200

26 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 17:15:33 -0800

65 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:05:26 +0100

58 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 07:27:26 +0100

34 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:41:16 +0000

53 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:44:38 +0000

45 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:48:50 +0000

28 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 09:53:52 -0800

52 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 10:01:18 -0800

49 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 12:40:12 -0800

21 lines

Re: scraper sharpening

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 13:46:27 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Siberian sounds

Siberian sounds

Zach <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 09:32:15 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

sins of the fathers

sins of the fathers

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:19:28 -0500

24 lines

Re: sins of the fathers

Jane Haddam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 19:44:15 EST

27 lines

New Thread

specific gravity

Re: specific gravity

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:56:16 +0000

27 lines

Re: specific gravity

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:15:06 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:12:36 -0800

16 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 02:32:57 +0400

31 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:38:31 -0500

38 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:10:51 +0200

34 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 05:53:54 -0800

52 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 06:08:22 -0800

24 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 19:48:06 +0100

27 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 15:02:27 EST

30 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:13:15 -0500

23 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 16:33:10 -0500

57 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 01:56:40 +0400

35 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 00:31:02 +0200

17 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 09:46:12 +0000

30 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:05:34 +1000

28 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:55:55 +0100

22 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:57:57 +0100

19 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 05:50:53 -0800

24 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 16:45:06 -0500

16 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 01:42:13 +0200

23 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:19:42 -0500

29 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 22:24:56 -0500

36 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:54:23 +0100

63 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 12:21:20 -0800

13 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 18:09:28 -0500

25 lines

Re: specific gravity was stable woods, and jack taper

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 08:07:00 EST

46 lines

New Thread

Spinoza bulletin (was: stoic intellectial credo)

Spinoza bulletin (was: stoic intellectial credo)

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 16:01:12 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

Square

Square

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 20:02:31 -0500

25 lines

Re: Square

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:11:10 -0600

37 lines

Re: Square

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 17:16:23 -0800

73 lines

Re: Square

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 22:14:32 -0500

37 lines

Re: Square

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:59:09 +0100

63 lines

Re: Square

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 08:31:59 +0000

25 lines

Re: Square

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 19:38:32 +0000

53 lines

Re: Square

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 15:03:34 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Squishing bentsides

Squishing bentsides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

25 lines

New Thread

stable woods, was jack taper

stable woods, was jack taper

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 18:17:27 +0200

27 lines

Re: stable woods, was jack taper

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 22:00:47 +0400

46 lines

Re: stable woods, was jack taper

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 21:11:12 +0200

20 lines

Re: stable woods, was jack taper

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:52:21 -0800

39 lines

Re: stable woods, was jack taper

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Jan 2006 08:37:24 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

steps forward

steps forward

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 15:53:23 -0500

60 lines

New Thread

sticking jacks

sticking jacks

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 14:50:19 +0000

26 lines

Re: sticking jacks

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 16:56:59 +0100

40 lines

sticking jacks

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Jan 2006 18:59:26 +0000

28 lines

Re: sticking jacks

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Jan 2006 07:37:39 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

stoic intellectial credo

Re: stoic intellectial credo

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 23:06:33 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

stoic intellectial credo was graverobbing Scientists

stoic intellectial credo was graverobbing Scientists

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Jan 2006 16:51:42 +0200

44 lines

Re: stoic intellectial credo was graverobbing Scientists

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 15:03:29 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

tapered jacks & such

tapered jacks & such

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 17:48:21 +0200

31 lines

Re: tapered jacks & such

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 10:56:09 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

Taskin tapered jacks

Taskin tapered jacks

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 06:07:34 -0800

18 lines

Re: Taskin tapered jacks

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:32:07 +0000

32 lines

Re: Taskin tapered jacks

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 09:51:23 -0500

19 lines

Re: Taskin tapered jacks

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 12:06:27 EST

39 lines

Re: Taskin tapered jacks

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:29:38 +0100

34 lines

Re: Taskin tapered jacks

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 11:34:28 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Thanks...

Thanks...

Noel Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 23:32:17 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

The Listserve Appearance

The Listserve Appearance

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Jan 2006 06:18:59 -0500

29 lines

The Listserve Appearance

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 12:13:13 +0100

29 lines

Re: The Listserve Appearance

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Jan 2006 10:07:07 -0500

27 lines

Re: The Listserve Appearance

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 00:47:36 -0500

28 lines

Re: The Listserve Appearance

Andreas Edlund <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Jan 2006 03:55:06 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

The solution to the intruder

The solution to the intruder

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 16:28:56 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

The Ultimate in Ephemera

The Ultimate in Ephemera

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 04:18:56 -0600

30 lines

Re: The Ultimate in Ephemera

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

50 lines

New Thread

Total string tension

Total string tension

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 08:25:29 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch

Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 09:21:51 -0800

23 lines

Re: Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 15:06:55 -0500

28 lines

Re: Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 13:33:18 -0800

40 lines

Re: Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Jan 2006 18:27:43 -0500

26 lines

Re: Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 00:00:00 GMT

15 lines

Re: Tricky repairs was Dulcken pitch

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Jan 2006 11:15:18 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Tuma's Goldberg Variations

Tuma's Goldberg Variations

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 14:42:30 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Tuning hammers

Tuning hammers

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Jan 2006 09:37:06 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

Tuning the irregular Kirnbergers by ear

Tuning the irregular Kirnbergers by ear

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:32:40 -0500

74 lines

Re: Tuning the irregular Kirnbergers by ear

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:36:16 +0400

42 lines

Re: Tuning the irregular Kirnbergers by ear

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:46:00 -0500

37 lines

Re: Tuning the irregular Kirnbergers by ear

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 12:22:40 -0500

28 lines

Re: Tuning the irregular Kirnbergers by ear

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 01:27:31 +0400

49 lines

New Thread

turde harpsichords

Re: turde harpsichords

paul poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 21:16:17 +0200

30 lines

Re: turde harpsichords

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 20:41:19 +0100

25 lines

Re: turde harpsichords

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 12:03:24 -0800

24 lines

Re: turde harpsichords

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 31 Jan 2006 22:49:33 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

typische bloedheit was Marpurg 1790 - a sample

typische bloedheit was Marpurg 1790 - a sample

turpin fitch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Jan 2006 11:20:15 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

Vater and low so-called French pitch.

Vater and low so-called French pitch.

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:00:46 +0100

26 lines

Re: Vater and low so-called French pitch.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 18:21:29 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Vater at French pitch

Vater at French pitch

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 10:41:42 -0800

22 lines

Re: Vater at French pitch

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Jan 2006 22:30:16 +0100

59 lines

Re: Vater at French pitch

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:34:58 +0100

23 lines

Re: Vater at French pitch

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 11:38:38 +0100

21 lines

Re: Vater at French pitch

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 15:26:43 +0100

37 lines

Re: Vater at French pitch

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Jan 2006 20:59:13 +0100

22 lines

Re: Vater at French pitch

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Jan 2006 06:48:32 +0000

47 lines

New Thread

Werckbetter

Werckbetter

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 19:52:05 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Werckmeister 3 by ear

Werckmeister 3 by ear

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 11:28:01 -0500

82 lines

New Thread

Wikipedia (wasinegale/temperaments)

Re: Wikipedia (wasinegale/temperaments)

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Jan 2006 19:49:37 -0700

47 lines

Re: Wikipedia (wasinegale/temperaments)

Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 00:50:19 -0500

23 lines

Re: Wikipedia (wasinegale/temperaments)

Thomas Dent <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 13:18:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: Wikipedia (wasinegale/temperaments)

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 07:01:16 -0700

38 lines

Re: Wikipedia (wasinegale/temperaments)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Jan 2006 15:09:00 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

wound bass strings

wound bass strings

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:00:54 +0000

61 lines

New Thread

Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 09:03:54 -0800

25 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Jan 2006 23:57:32 +0100

53 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 06:25:57 -0500

57 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Akio Obuchi <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 20:52:10 +0900

33 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:22:05 +0100

33 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 09:59:27 -0800

90 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:14:04 -0500

34 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 13:52:37 -0500

83 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:01:26 -0500

36 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:18:24 -0800

112 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 11:23:26 -0800

68 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 14:37:59 -0500

38 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 18:17:02 -0500

53 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Jan 2006 15:46:19 -0800

31 lines

Re: Wound strings attached to straight strings?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 07:49:04 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

Young #1

Young #1

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:34:45 -0500

63 lines

Re: Young #1

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:09:27 -0500

24 lines

Re: Young #1

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 15:17:14 -0500

19 lines

Re: Young #1

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 20:47:04 -0600

55 lines

Re: Young #1

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 02:50:21 -0500

17 lines

Re: Young #1

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Jan 2006 14:30:10 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Z-Box tuning question

Z-Box tuning question

Victor Celarier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 13:29:34 -0500

11 lines

Re: Z-Box tuning question

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Jan 2006 10:40:42 -0800

21 lines

Re: Z-Box tuning question

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Jan 2006 10:05:35 +0400

32 lines

New Thread

Zuckerman parts

Zuckerman parts

Thomas Murach <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Jan 2006 10:01:38 -0800

17 lines