LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


March 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

      Re: 1722: Froberger et al (1 message)
      Re: Nabokov and the Pleyel (1 message)
1/6 comma, Telemann 55-non-keyboard division of the octave, Neidhardt WAS: Re: Affekt from unequal tunings (1 message)
13th biennial Boston Early Music Festival -- June 13-19, 2005 (1 message)
1722: Froberger et al (4 messages)
1722: Froberger... (3 messages)
1722: one size fits all? (31 messages)
55-division (4 messages)
8+4 interlude (1 message)
Absolute Pitch? (2 messages)
Addendum (1 message)
Affekt from unequal tunings (5 messages)
agogics/ornaments (4 messages)
Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings? (8 messages)
Bach family temp? (1 message)
Bach Tuning Resources web page idea (1 message)
Bach's other temperament (6 messages)
Bach's other temperament(s) (1 message)
Baltimore harpsichord repairs (1 message)
Barbour's Neidhardts (1 message)
BEMF? (1 message)
Broadwood repetition grand FS (3 messages)
budget glory (2 messages)
Burney facsimiles (2 messages)
childhood subversion anecdote (2 messages)
clavichord concertos (5 messages)
clavichord tuition (4 messages)
Clavichord tuition in US (5 messages)
Clavichord tuition in US music colleges (2 messages)
Clavichord tuition in US music colleges /Harpsichord (1 message)
Concert in Stonington (1 message)
Correct addresses for Revised Essay on 1/18thPC temperament (1 message)
CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41 (6 messages)
Did JSB have Absolute Pitch? (13 messages)
Electronic Anathema/Roland Harpsichord (1 message)
Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script. (11 messages)
expressiveness, shock or just bad intervals – mean meantone intervals (1 message)
FINDING TECHNICIANS-TUNERS (3 messages)
Fischer's loops in 1715 Ariadne musica (2 messages)
Fortepiano soundboard crack (2 messages)
Fwd: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings? (2 messages)
Glinka (6 messages)
Harmonic Spectra (8 messages)
improvisation and the old guys (1 message)
J S Bach's (& CPE's and Friedemann's) tuning? (2 messages)
JS Bach's tuning (9 messages)
JS Bach's tuning, no joking (1 message)
Kirkpatrick (6 messages)
Latin and German (1 message)
Lehman's tuning, and Neidhardt's (1 message)
lincoln venice tampere (1 message)
Marpurg & Kirnberger (11 messages)
Marpurg & Kirnberger & Bach (5 messages)
Masterclass in Providence, RI (1 message)
mattheson's boris (3 messages)
Nabokov and the Pleyel (3 messages)
New Louis Couperin recording (6 messages)
old Dowd jacks and springs? (2 messages)
owens ordinaire (2 messages)
Oxford resources (1 message)
paper organists playing pre-composed music + SORGE (2 messages)
paper organists playing pre-composed music FROBERGER ,PACHELBEL and stuff (2 messages)
Pedal Challis at Met (7 messages)
Peter Tkach retiring (1 message)
pitch: Chorton / Cammerton (1 message)
Playing and singing in tune, was temperament: harmonic vs. melodic (1 message)
Practical tuning instructions (1 message)
R and R (4 messages)
reftones v.00000001 (4 messages)
Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament (3 messages)
Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament: Typos and whatnot corrected. (1 message)
Rifkin's Bach cantata (1 message)
Silbermann Unfretted Clavichord (1 message)
Skowroneck book (4 messages)
Sorge (3 messages)
Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part II – LONG (1 message)
Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END – corrected (1 message)
Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END – LONG (1 message)
Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END - LONG (1 message)
Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005, part I – LONG (1 message)
Special Event at the Dallas Institute (1 message)
Stanley Sadie (1 message)
Telemann Solos available (1 message)
Telemann: Zwei Klavier Sonaten ed. David Pickett (1 message)
temperament around Froberger (and a bit Bach); Viennese keyboards with split keys and 'enharmonic' organs, Rome, Frescobaldi, Huygens (3 messages)
Temperament terms (1 message)
temperament: harmonic vs. melodic (12 messages)
tempered fifths (15 messages)
tempered fifths: I have it! (1 message)
text fragments (2 messages)
the big C and D, etc, and clearing up some other questions (1 message)
The Holy Grail (2 messages)
Tom Jones hpschd (2 messages)
treadle lathe (3 messages)
treat yourself (3 messages)
try this one for size (7 messages)
tuning for the Goldbergs etc (2 messages)
Tuning Tales of the City - the other City, up here (2 messages)
venetian virginal regress report (3 messages)
What constitutes "Clavichord study" (1 message)
Why different temperaments? (13 messages)
wide fifths and hybrid temps (6 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

      Re: 1722: Froberger et al

Re:       Re: 1722: Froberger et al

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:14:38 EST

38 lines

New Thread

      Re: Nabokov and the Pleyel

Re:       Re: Nabokov and the Pleyel

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 00:29:18 EST

20 lines

New Thread

1/6 comma, Telemann 55-non-keyboard division of the octave, Neidhardt WAS: Re: Affekt from unequal tunings

1/6 comma, Telemann 55-non-keyboard division of the octave, Neidhardt WAS: Re: Affekt from unequal tunings

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:53:54 +0100

115 lines

New Thread

13th biennial Boston Early Music Festival -- June 13-19, 2005

13th biennial Boston Early Music Festival -- June 13-19, 2005

Shannon Canavin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:51:11 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

1722: Froberger et al

1722: Froberger et al

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 08:32:19 -0500

70 lines

Re: 1722: Froberger et al

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 15:25:29 +0100

80 lines

Re: 1722: Froberger et al

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:24:00 -0500

54 lines

Re: 1722: Froberger et al

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 01:38:28 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

1722: Froberger...

1722: Froberger...

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 10:49:53 -0500

27 lines

Re: 1722: Froberger...

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 20:28:36 +0100

95 lines

Re: 1722: Froberger...

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:05:25 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

1722: one size fits all?

1722: one size fits all?

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 08:44:52 -0500

75 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 07:14:13 -0800

19 lines

1722: one size fits all?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 13:41:10 -0500

83 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:55:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 15:35:04 -0500

55 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:27:31 -0500

61 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:21:16 -0500

24 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 17:27:57 -0800

55 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 21:39:06 -0500

32 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 23:38:41 -0500

56 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:24:20 -0500

27 lines

1722: one size fits all?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 01:53:14 -0500

33 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 12:04:47 -0800

105 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 19:01:10 -0500

63 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:41:00 +0000

36 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:45:31 -0500

47 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 07:39:10 -0800

66 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:09:21 -0800

97 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:14:55 -0500

27 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:18:24 -0500

20 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

julio galvao <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 11:50:43 +0000

43 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Huw Saunders <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:15:24 -0000

23 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:09:21 -0800

46 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 21:07:50 +0200

15 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:13:45 -0500

17 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

William C. Parsons <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:59:04 -0500

21 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:57:20 -0800

30 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 17:35:34 -0500

32 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:46:00 -0500

18 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 20:17:19 -0600

69 lines

Re: 1722: one size fits all?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:26:57 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

55-division

55-division

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:51:19 -0500

85 lines

Re: 55-division

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 17:46:31 -0500

94 lines

Re: 55-division

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 23:28:30 -0500

25 lines

Re: 55-division

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 01:36:59 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

8+4 interlude

8+4 interlude

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 17:01:19 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

Absolute Pitch?

Absolute Pitch?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:38:40 +0000

35 lines

Re: Absolute Pitch?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:32:19 +0000

37 lines

New Thread

Addendum

Addendum

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:39:42 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

Affekt from unequal tunings

Affekt from unequal tunings

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:43:38 -0500

22 lines

Re: Affekt from unequal tunings

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:00:31 -0500

30 lines

Re: Affekt from unequal tunings

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:02:47 -0800

50 lines

Re: Affekt from unequal tunings

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:55:16 -0500

20 lines

Re: Affekt from unequal tunings

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 02:39:21 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

agogics/ornaments

Re: agogics/ornaments

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 00:01:04 -0500

37 lines

Re: agogics/ornaments

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:03:59 +0100

25 lines

Re: agogics/ornaments

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:45:39 -0500

24 lines

Re: agogics/ornaments

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 15:19:43 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 11:40:39 -0800

34 lines

Re: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 17:57:57 -0500

22 lines

Re: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 15:09:14 -0800

34 lines

Re: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 09:59:17 -0500

38 lines

Re: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:25:43 -0800

49 lines

Re: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 17:58:20 EST

35 lines

Re: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:24:08 -0500

68 lines

Re: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:28:27 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

Bach family temp?

Bach family temp?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 15:12:31 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Bach Tuning Resources web page idea

Bach Tuning Resources web page idea

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:11:15 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Bach's other temperament

Bach's other temperament

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:40:48 -0500

33 lines

Re: Bach's other temperament

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:45:58 +0100

18 lines

Re: Bach's other temperament

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:36:42 -0500

35 lines

Re: Bach's other temperament

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:59:23 -0500

31 lines

Re: Bach's other temperament

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 13:49:43 -0500

30 lines

Re: Bach's other temperament

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:35:39 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

Bach's other temperament(s)

Re: Bach's other temperament(s)

Loren Carle <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 12:43:29 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Baltimore harpsichord repairs

Baltimore harpsichord repairs

Paul Gunzelmann <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:16:32 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Barbour's Neidhardts

Barbour's Neidhardts

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:10:55 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

BEMF?

BEMF?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 18:42:44 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Broadwood repetition grand FS

Broadwood repetition grand FS

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 22:36:09 +1100

19 lines

Re: Broadwood repetition grand FS

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:00:45 +0000

61 lines

Re: Broadwood repetition grand FS

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:54:34 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

budget glory

budget glory

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 15:46:33 +0200

12 lines

Re: budget glory

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 10:27:56 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Burney facsimiles

Burney facsimiles

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:02:41 -0000

30 lines

Re: Burney facsimiles

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 19:24:58 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

childhood subversion anecdote

childhood subversion anecdote

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 02:05:51 +0200

19 lines

Re: childhood subversion anecdote

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:52:28 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

clavichord concertos

clavichord concertos

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:57:33 -0500

28 lines

Re: clavichord concertos

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:23:30 -0500

30 lines

Re: clavichord concertos

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 17:27:11 -0500

30 lines

Re: clavichord concertos

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 10:28:35 +0100

21 lines

Re: clavichord concertos

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 12:19:28 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

clavichord tuition

clavichord tuition

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 13:03:21 GMT

13 lines

Re: clavichord tuition

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:22:25 -0800

31 lines

Re: clavichord tuition

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 14:42:06 -0500

14 lines

Re: clavichord tuition

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:25:13 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Clavichord tuition in US

Clavichord tuition in US

Oliver <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 12:22:45 -0600

12 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:02:29 -0500

19 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 16:28:23 -0600

17 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 08:37:14 -0500

16 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 17:01:32 +0000

15 lines

New Thread

Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 01:04:21 -0800

13 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Margo Dillard <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 07:23:35 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

Clavichord tuition in US music colleges /Harpsichord

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges /Harpsichord

Shirley Baker-Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:39:43 -0800

65 lines

New Thread

Concert in Stonington

Concert in Stonington

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 16:23:18 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Correct addresses for Revised Essay on 1/18thPC temperament

Correct addresses for Revised Essay on 1/18thPC temperament

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:03:26 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41

CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:26:13 -0500

40 lines

Re: CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 09:28:12 -0500

39 lines

Re: CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:13:19 +0100

24 lines

Re: CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 10:13:54 -0500

23 lines

Re: CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 17:18:13 -0500

26 lines

Re: CPE's impurities; & the Taylor & Boody organ 41

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 15:25:13 -0800

67 lines

New Thread

Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:47:16 -0500

20 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:19:22 -0500

65 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 17:51:30 -0600

139 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 19:40:37 -0500

59 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 05:21:18 -0500

44 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 07:27:30 -0500

29 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 10:37:45 -0500

37 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:20:26 -0500

73 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 21:23:21 +0200

67 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 15:16:17 -0500

27 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 19:36:17 EST

15 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 22:22:59 -0600

37 lines

Re: Did JSB have Absolute Pitch?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 23:37:25 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

Electronic Anathema/Roland Harpsichord

Re: Electronic Anathema/Roland Harpsichord

noel jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 19:55:21 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 14:37:29 -0800

57 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:39:30 -0500

55 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:38:53 -0800

122 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 19:41:12 -0800

55 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:17:18 -0800

108 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 21:33:40 -0800

60 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 15:34:08 +0100

24 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 07:59:11 -0800

77 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 18:10:18 -0500

45 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:12:56 -0800

121 lines

Re: Essay on a 1/18thPC reinterpretation of the Bach WTC tuning script.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 10:51:48 -0800

222 lines

New Thread

expressiveness, shock or just bad intervals – mean meantone intervals

expressiveness, shock or just bad intervals – mean meantone intervals

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 19:27:43 +0100

154 lines

New Thread

FINDING TECHNICIANS-TUNERS

FINDING TECHNICIANS-TUNERS

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 10:00:21 -0800

29 lines

Re: FINDING TECHNICIANS-TUNERS

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 03:14:36 +0000

15 lines

Re: FINDING TECHNICIANS-TUNERS

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 06:19:30 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Fischer's loops in 1715 Ariadne musica

Fischer's loops in 1715 Ariadne musica

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 08:56:41 -0500

52 lines

Re: Fischer's loops in 1715 Ariadne musica

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 11:48:53 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Fortepiano soundboard crack

Fortepiano soundboard crack

stephen kabat <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 11:39:53 -0500

41 lines

Re: Fortepiano soundboard crack

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 20:58:59 +1100

68 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Fwd: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 15:05:14 -0800

38 lines

Re: Fwd: Anyone here know why I get these "=20" s in postings?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 16:31:18 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Glinka

Glinka

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:49:50 -0800

52 lines

Glinka

Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 23:18:39 +1000

90 lines

Re: Glinka

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 09:49:28 -0500

45 lines

Re: Glinka

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 07:00:50 -0800

51 lines

Re: Glinka

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Mar 2005 17:52:56 +0200

37 lines

Re: Glinka

Jon Hayward <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 11:14:46 +1000

50 lines

New Thread

Harmonic Spectra

Harmonic Spectra

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:04:21 -0500

33 lines

Harmonic Spectra

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:21:04 -0500

33 lines

Re: Harmonic Spectra

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:35:26 -0500

19 lines

Re: Harmonic Spectra

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:56:12 -0500

37 lines

Re: Harmonic Spectra

Jonathan Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:06:31 -0500

34 lines

Re: Harmonic Spectra

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:22:54 -0500

26 lines

Re: Harmonic Spectra

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:37:50 -0500

70 lines

Re: Harmonic Spectra

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:37:03 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

improvisation and the old guys

improvisation and the old guys

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 16:25:15 +0200

68 lines

New Thread

J S Bach's (& CPE's and Friedemann's) tuning?

J S Bach's (& CPE's and Friedemann's) tuning?

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 19:56:07 -0500

23 lines

Re: J S Bach's (& CPE's and Friedemann's) tuning?

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 13:42:44 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

JS Bach's tuning

Re: JS Bach's tuning

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 22:45:37 -0500

21 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 11:51:52 -0500

10 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 08:59:16 -0800

57 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 14:04:35 -0500

51 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 12:10:49 -0800

122 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 02:58:39 -0500

37 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 09:49:27 +0100

22 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 08:52:16 -0800

79 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 12:54:27 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

JS Bach's tuning, no joking

Re: JS Bach's tuning, no joking

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:13:11 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

Kirkpatrick

Kirkpatrick

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 07:34:30 -0500

20 lines

Kirkpatrick

Daniel Lindblom <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 09:28:23 EST

24 lines

Kirkpatrick

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 12:18:06 -0500

38 lines

Re: Kirkpatrick

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 11:55:38 -0800

31 lines

Kirkpatrick

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:16:29 -0500

16 lines

Re: Kirkpatrick

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 01:18:55 -0800

13 lines

New Thread

Latin and German

Latin and German

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 08:34:54 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Lehman's tuning, and Neidhardt's

Lehman's tuning, and Neidhardt's

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 23:39:42 -0500

66 lines

New Thread

lincoln venice tampere

lincoln venice tampere

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 05:40:36 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

Marpurg & Kirnberger

Marpurg & Kirnberger

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:56:25 -0500

47 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:56:52 -0700

31 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 23:17:52 -0700

59 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 02:31:29 -0500

46 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 07:41:18 -0500

18 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 14:27:25 -0000

18 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 09:28:16 -0500

30 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:00:05 -0500

76 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 08:01:35 -0700

23 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:03:00 -0500

20 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 15:51:18 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Marpurg & Kirnberger & Bach

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger & Bach

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 11:33:16 +0100

184 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger & Bach

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 10:23:17 -0500

91 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger & Bach

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:24:41 -0500

20 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger & Bach

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 10:33:42 -0500

34 lines

Re: Marpurg & Kirnberger & Bach

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 18:59:41 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Masterclass in Providence, RI

Masterclass in Providence, RI

Glenn Giuttari <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 10:32:50 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

mattheson's boris

mattheson's boris

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 02:01:19 +0200

29 lines

Re: mattheson's boris

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Mar 2005 15:52:18 -0800

37 lines

Re: mattheson's boris

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 16:47:32 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Nabokov and the Pleyel

Nabokov and the Pleyel

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 20:59:03 -0500

24 lines

Re: Nabokov and the Pleyel

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 23:59:55 EST

12 lines

Re: Nabokov and the Pleyel

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Mar 2005 07:27:53 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

New Louis Couperin recording

New Louis Couperin recording

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 13:33:44 -0600

23 lines

Re: New Louis Couperin recording

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:29:59 -0500

38 lines

Re: New Louis Couperin recording

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 15:02:56 -0600

33 lines

Re: New Louis Couperin recording

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 18:44:01 -0500

22 lines

Re: New Louis Couperin recording

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Mar 2005 20:28:56 -0600

33 lines

Re: New Louis Couperin recording

paul-james dwyer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 02:00:50 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

old Dowd jacks and springs?

old Dowd jacks and springs?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 19:06:31 -0500

28 lines

Re: old Dowd jacks and springs?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Mar 2005 16:57:41 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

owens ordinaire

owens ordinaire

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:37:54 +0200

30 lines

Re: owens ordinaire

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 09:46:50 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

Oxford resources

Oxford resources

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 16:01:19 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

paper organists playing pre-composed music + SORGE

Re: paper organists playing pre-composed music + SORGE

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 14:29:40 +0100

227 lines

Re: paper organists playing pre-composed music + SORGE

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 20:04:53 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

paper organists playing pre-composed music FROBERGER ,PACHELBEL and stuff

Re: paper organists playing pre-composed music FROBERGER ,PACHELBEL and stuff

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 15:03:10 +0100

145 lines

Re: paper organists playing pre-composed music FROBERGER ,PACHELBEL and stuff

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 17:51:18 +0100

112 lines

New Thread

Pedal Challis at Met

Pedal Challis at Met

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Mar 2005 22:42:53 -0500

50 lines

Re: Pedal Challis at Met

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 07:29:19 +0000

38 lines

Re: Pedal Challis at Met

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:32:52 -0500

52 lines

Re: Pedal Challis at Met

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:39:17 -0600

39 lines

Re: Pedal Challis at Met

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 03:08:46 +0200

14 lines

Re: Pedal Challis at Met

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:09:57 -0800

14 lines

Re: Pedal Challis at Met

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:11:05 -0800

9 lines

New Thread

Peter Tkach retiring

Peter Tkach retiring

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 03:05:14 +0600

22 lines

New Thread

pitch: Chorton / Cammerton

pitch: Chorton / Cammerton

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 16:36:58 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

Playing and singing in tune, was temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Playing and singing in tune, was temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 17:46:44 -0700

74 lines

New Thread

Practical tuning instructions

Practical tuning instructions

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Mar 2005 18:20:56 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

R and R

R and R

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:30:24 -0700

32 lines

R and R

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 10:32:18 -0700

12 lines

Re: R and R

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 17:49:55 -0600

25 lines

Re: R and R

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Mar 2005 21:37:25 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

reftones v.00000001

reftones v.00000001

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:03:52 -0500

40 lines

Re: reftones v.00000001

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 13:56:34 -0800

29 lines

Re: reftones v.00000001

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 17:02:49 -0500

32 lines

Re: reftones v.00000001

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Mar 2005 20:05:06 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament

Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 09:43:50 -0800

62 lines

Re: Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 10:22:07 -0800

19 lines

Re: Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 11:00:13 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament: Typos and whatnot corrected.

Re: Revised Essay on a 1/18thPC temperament: Typos and whatnot corrected.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 18:00:00 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

Rifkin's Bach cantata

Rifkin's Bach cantata

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:15:11 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Silbermann Unfretted Clavichord

Silbermann Unfretted Clavichord

Paul Maurici <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 22:04:50 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

Skowroneck book

Skowroneck book

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:15:27 -0500

18 lines

Re: Skowroneck book

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:32:41 -0500

22 lines

Re: Skowroneck book

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:15:31 -0800

39 lines

Re: Skowroneck book

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 14:10:20 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Sorge

Sorge

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 08:49:11 -0500

34 lines

Re: Sorge

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 06:41:54 -0800

81 lines

Re: Sorge

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 07:08:26 -0800

97 lines

New Thread

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part II – LONG

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part II – LONG

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:48:52 +0100

120 lines

New Thread

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END – corrected

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END – corrected

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 09:44:58 +0100

129 lines

New Thread

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END – LONG

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END – LONG

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 00:05:42 +0100

211 lines

New Thread

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END - LONG

RE: Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005 Part III/END - LONG

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 18:40:40 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005, part I – LONG

Sorge temperament 1758 and Lehman temperament 2005, part I – LONG

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 23:17:04 +0100

116 lines

New Thread

Special Event at the Dallas Institute

Re: Special Event at the Dallas Institute

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 19:16:40 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Stanley Sadie

Stanley Sadie

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 09:13:57 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Telemann Solos available

Telemann Solos available

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Mar 2005 12:22:59 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Telemann: Zwei Klavier Sonaten ed. David Pickett

Telemann: Zwei Klavier Sonaten ed. David Pickett

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 14:18:26 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

temperament around Froberger (and a bit Bach); Viennese keyboards with split keys and 'enharmonic' organs, Rome, Frescobaldi, Huygens

temperament around Froberger (and a bit Bach); Viennese keyboards with split keys and 'enharmonic' organs, Rome, Frescobaldi, Huygens

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 13:04:24 +0100

208 lines

Re: temperament around Froberger (and a bit Bach); Viennese keyboards with split keys and 'enharmonic' organs, Rome, Frescobaldi, Huygens

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:58:38 -0500

27 lines

Re: temperament around Froberger (and a bit Bach); Viennese keyboards with split keys and 'enharmonic' organs, Rome, Frescobaldi, Huygens

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 17:03:17 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

Temperament terms

Temperament terms

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Mar 2005 14:35:05 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 09:58:28 -0600

42 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 12:45:27 -0500

61 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 01:56:20 -0500

32 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 10:46:30 +0100

48 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 09:51:42 -0500

47 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 11:46:29 -0500

35 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 14:52:35 -0500

46 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 21:45:54 +0100

61 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:43:57 -0500

47 lines

Re: temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Mar 2005 16:55:07 -0700

36 lines

Temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 01:09:33 +0100

26 lines

Re: Temperament: harmonic vs. melodic

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 31 Mar 2005 12:02:14 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

tempered fifths

tempered fifths

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 13:55:25 -0800

16 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:04:41 -0800

24 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:07:38 -0500

23 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:15:12 -0800

23 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 14:22:18 -0800

24 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:38:56 EST

25 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:48:25 EST

28 lines

Re: tempered fifths

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 17:49:38 -0500

20 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:00:22 -0800

24 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:11:34 -0800

25 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:14:27 -0800

22 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:17:24 -0800

30 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 16:32:20 -0800

22 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 22:00:12 -0500

25 lines

Re: tempered fifths

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:04:47 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

tempered fifths: I have it!

Re: tempered fifths: I have it!

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 21:09:13 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

text fragments

text fragments

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 13:03:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: text fragments

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 10:36:37 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

the big C and D, etc, and clearing up some other questions

the big C and D, etc, and clearing up some other questions

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Mar 2005 13:11:17 -0500

106 lines

New Thread

The Holy Grail

The Holy Grail

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 14:04:57 -0500

132 lines

Re: The Holy Grail

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Mar 2005 12:17:19 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

Tom Jones hpschd

Tom Jones hpschd

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Mar 2005 20:46:25 -0600

11 lines

Re: Tom Jones hpschd

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Mar 2005 01:06:27 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

treadle lathe

treadle lathe

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 09:25:26 -0600

32 lines

Re: treadle lathe

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 08:42:28 -0800

42 lines

Re: treadle lathe

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Mar 2005 16:49:06 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

treat yourself

treat yourself

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Mar 2005 09:30:31 +0000

20 lines

Re: treat yourself

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Mar 2005 18:28:33 -0500

29 lines

Re: treat yourself

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Mar 2005 06:41:24 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

try this one for size

try this one for size

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 16:12:42 +0000

16 lines

Re: try this one for size

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 11:49:25 -0500

31 lines

Re: try this one for size

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:16:47 -0500

26 lines

try this one for size

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 12:28:06 -0500

17 lines

Re: try this one for size

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 10:00:13 -0800

26 lines

Re: try this one for size

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 14:36:19 +0000

30 lines

Re: try this one for size

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Mar 2005 19:50:32 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

tuning for the Goldbergs etc

tuning for the Goldbergs etc

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 10:08:46 -0500

36 lines

Re: tuning for the Goldbergs etc

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:22:42 -0800

123 lines

New Thread

Tuning Tales of the City - the other City, up here

Tuning Tales of the City - the other City, up here

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 14:32:00 -0800

145 lines

Tuning Tales of the City - the other City, up here

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Mar 2005 19:13:24 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

venetian virginal regress report

venetian virginal regress report

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 19:25:48 +0200

33 lines

Re: venetian virginal regress report

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 12:39:51 -0500

23 lines

Re: venetian virginal regress report

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Mar 2005 20:17:20 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

What constitutes "Clavichord study"

What constitutes "Clavichord study"

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Mar 2005 06:42:21 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

Why different temperaments?

Why different temperaments?

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 08:20:57 +0000

17 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 17:49:34 +0200

34 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:14:29 -0500

23 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 14:45:01 EST

32 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 15:56:57 -0500

46 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Mar 2005 20:01:33 -0500

37 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 03:35:40 +0200

38 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

Johan Norrback <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Mar 2005 04:08:50 -0500

24 lines

Re: Why different temperaments?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 17:31:04 -0700

43 lines

why different temperaments?

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Mar 2005 22:32:24 -0500

59 lines

Re: why different temperaments?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 12:00:50 +0100

34 lines

Re: why different temperaments?

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 08:54:27 -0500

29 lines

Re: why different temperaments?

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Mar 2005 15:15:41 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

wide fifths and hybrid temps

Re: wide fifths and hybrid temps

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 11:42:17 -0500

30 lines

Re: wide fifths and hybrid temps

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Mar 2005 13:03:35 -0500

53 lines

Re: wide fifths and hybrid temps

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 09:03:17 -0500

47 lines

Re: wide fifths and hybrid temps

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 07:19:32 -0800

41 lines

Re: wide fifths and hybrid temps

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 10:22:28 -0500

39 lines

Re: wide fifths and hybrid temps

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Mar 2005 11:41:16 -0500

100 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu