LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2005


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

2005 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina (3 messages)
A new Rant! (2 messages)
aapo hakkinen eddress (1 message)
Affekt (5 messages)
Affekt / accent (1 message)
Affekt/ ornaments (2 messages)
Affekt/temporal issues in music (1 message)
agogics/ornaments (3 messages)
Apology! (1 message)
Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news (6 messages)
Auditory differences between L/R (2 messages)
Auditory differences between L/R - correction (1 message)
BachScholarJokes (2 messages)
BachScholarsJoke (1 message)
BachScholarsJoke, now Bierernste Musikwissenschaft (1 message)
Bandsaw Tune Up (4 messages)
Bradley Lehman's tuning (1 message)
Breaking news (7 messages)
broadwood harpsichord on eBay (2 messages)
BSJ (1 message)
buntebart square (1 message)
cent charts, and Temperament Units etc (5 messages)
clavichord tuition (1 message)
Clavichord tuition in US music colleges (13 messages)
clean clothes, was List shirts (2 messages)
Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST (7 messages)
Daniel's Alternate WTC temperament script Interpretation FINAL RE-POST (1 message)
des remous douces (1 message)
Electronic Anathema (10 messages)
filth (1 message)
fractions of comma (1 message)
FW: Was JSB left-handed? (1 message)
gardening with polygons (3 messages)
Grimaldi (3 messages)
Harpsipixlist? (4 messages)
Hi all, (1 message)
hipkins (4 messages)
Hipkins / Broadwood (1 message)
hipkins piano history (3 messages)
Historic practice and television (4 messages)
Holism (3 messages)
hpschd in Texas (3 messages)
Hunter S. Thompson (1 message)
I dream of drilling holes! (2 messages)
Insurance (2 messages)
jacksprings (4 messages)
joussance and bloom (2 messages)
JS Bach's tuning (5 messages)
JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST (21 messages)
JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST: comma (2 messages)
Kirkpatrick (1 message)
left-handedness (1 message)
List shirts (9 messages)
List shirts bust (2 messages)
List shirts, caps available again! (1 message)
List shirts--Idea ? (3 messages)
Looking for Saturnino Cisneros (1 message)
MHKS/SEHKS Bach conference in March (3 messages)
More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and 24ths solutions (4 messages)
More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and24thssolutions (3 messages)
no trained birds (8 messages)
ot: sinister minority (1 message)
paper organists playing pre-composed music (2 messages)
pedagogy / right and left (1 message)
Pedagogy before 1750 or pedagogy of improvisation, transposition, WTC, French Ouverture and stuff (4 messages)
Pedagogy [was Re: right and left] (1 message)
Peter B's book (11 messages)
PIPORG-L logo (1 message)
Possibly a dumb question (1 message)
progress: the sword cuts both ways (6 messages)
quill source? (1 message)
re. woowooism (1 message)
right and left (28 messages)
right and left (long; sorry!) (1 message)
Right vs. Left (2 messages)
Rod Regier article (9 messages)
schismas (1 message)
Silbermann's way of tuning (4 messages)
Sorge 1758 (1 message)
Southwell Portapiano (1 message)
strange materials (2 messages)
Sussi (1 message)
temporal fission (1 message)
temporal issues in music (17 messages)
tfel dna thgir (4 messages)
the big/little C (1 message)
The Broadwood / Morley harpsichord on eBay -- redux (1 message)
The dreaded ET (1 message)
The dreaded ET and Silbermann (1 message)
The other way around (was: broadwood harpsichord on eBay) (5 messages)
The truth about Well temperaments (1 message)
the WTC calligraphy (4 messages)
the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation (8 messages)
The WTC Scrawl (6 messages)
thwarted by progress (1 message)
TPW Delin Spinet progress (2 messages)
tuner (2 messages)
venetian virginal progress report (4 messages)
vermeer's music (1 message)
Was JSB left-handed? (18 messages)
Well temperament or what? (6 messages)
well tempered clavichords in Gard? (1 message)
Why do the Nations so furiously rage Together? (3 messages)
willem kroesbergen / stephanini (1 message)
wood identification (1 message)
woowoo (2 messages)
woowooism (11 messages)
woowooism not any more (and never again) (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

2005 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina

2005 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina

Leopoldo Pérez Robledo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 00:12:33 -0500

16 lines

Re: 2005 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 01:46:51 -0500

31 lines

2005 Early Keyboard Music Cycle - Buenos Aires - Argentina

Leopoldo Pérez Robledo <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 10:38:53 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

A new Rant!

A new Rant!

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 07:08:08 -0800

30 lines

Re: A new Rant!

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:14:18 -0700

49 lines

New Thread

aapo hakkinen eddress

aapo hakkinen eddress

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 01:57:27 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

Affekt

Affekt

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 13:05:26 -0500

30 lines

Re: Affekt

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:37:05 -0800

37 lines

Re: Affekt

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:11:06 -0500

16 lines

Re: Affekt

Anna Vriend <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 22:37:00 +0000

23 lines

Re: Affekt

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:12:24 +0200

70 lines

New Thread

Affekt / accent

Affekt / accent

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 11:14:44 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Affekt/ ornaments

Re: Affekt/ ornaments

Shirley Baker-Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 17:35:04 -0800

61 lines

Re: Affekt/ ornaments

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 14:57:57 -0000

83 lines

New Thread

Affekt/temporal issues in music

Affekt/temporal issues in music

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 01:51:01 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

agogics/ornaments

agogics/ornaments

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:11:33 -0600

39 lines

Re: agogics/ornaments

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 20:16:31 -0500

36 lines

Re: agogics/ornaments

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 21:07:18 -0600

66 lines

New Thread

Apology!

Apology!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:50:33 +0000

16 lines

New Thread

Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news

Re: Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:22:53 -0000

43 lines

Re: Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 18:36:27 -0500

31 lines

Re: Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:45:26 -0600

39 lines

Re: Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:30:21 -0500

28 lines

Re: Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:45:13 -0800

44 lines

Re: Attitudes to historical performance practice, was Breaking news

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 19:12:33 +0000

34 lines

New Thread

Auditory differences between L/R

Auditory differences between L/R

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:06:37 -0600

22 lines

Re: Auditory differences between L/R

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:50:37 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Auditory differences between L/R - correction

Re: Auditory differences between L/R - correction

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 15:53:54 -0500

9 lines

New Thread

BachScholarJokes

Re: BachScholarJokes

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 07:30:42 -0500

22 lines

BachScholarJokes

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:29:09 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

BachScholarsJoke

BachScholarsJoke

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 18:17:27 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

BachScholarsJoke, now Bierernste Musikwissenschaft

BachScholarsJoke, now Bierernste Musikwissenschaft

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:04:06 -0500

56 lines

New Thread

Bandsaw Tune Up

Bandsaw Tune Up

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:29:35 -0500

44 lines

Re: Bandsaw Tune Up

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 18:23:36 -0600

103 lines

Re: Bandsaw Tune Up

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:13:36 +0100

46 lines

Re: Bandsaw Tune Up

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 07:06:33 EST

27 lines

New Thread

Bradley Lehman's tuning

Bradley Lehman's tuning

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:07:58 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Breaking news

Breaking news

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:55:29 +4913

45 lines

Re: Breaking news

Norm Purdy <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 08:00:21 -0800

13 lines

Re: Breaking news

L. T. Pirolli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:29:18 EST

19 lines

Re: Breaking news

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 12:41:59 -0700

19 lines

Re: Breaking news

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 10:18:51 -0500

25 lines

Re: Breaking news

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:07:57 -0800

77 lines

Re: Breaking news

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 12:36:35 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

broadwood harpsichord on eBay

broadwood harpsichord on eBay

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:07:17 +1100

13 lines

Re: broadwood harpsichord on eBay

Thomas Kendall <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:38:22 -0600

40 lines

New Thread

BSJ

Re: BSJ

) Marc |2eichow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:19:08 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

buntebart square

buntebart square

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:40:48 +1100

14 lines

New Thread

cent charts, and Temperament Units etc

cent charts, and Temperament Units etc

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:11:21 -0500

55 lines

Re: cent charts, and Temperament Units etc

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:04:31 +0100

83 lines

Re: cent charts, and Temperament Units etc

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:26:29 -0500

58 lines

Re: cent charts, and Temperament Units etc

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:46:13 -0500

23 lines

Re: cent charts, and Temperament Units etc

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 18:05:46 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

clavichord tuition

clavichord tuition

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:54:11 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Judith Wardman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 09:56:18 -0500

23 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 14:55:54 -0500

51 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:51:48 -0500

21 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:29:00 -0600

36 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:40:54 -0500

14 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Buddy <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 21:04:52 -0800

16 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Linda Dowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 05:35:00 -0800

30 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:56:27 -0500

14 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 09:39:32 -0500

41 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Ben Carlisle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 12:04:54 -0600

26 lines

Re: Clavichord tuition in US music colleges

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 17:09:17 -0500

31 lines

clavichord tuition in US music colleges

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 18:36:11 -0500

29 lines

Re: clavichord tuition in US music colleges

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:25:54 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

clean clothes, was List shirts

clean clothes, was List shirts

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 02:57:37 +0200

33 lines

Re: clean clothes, was List shirts

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 03:20:20 +0200

38 lines

New Thread

Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Re: Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:11:28 -0000

83 lines

Re: Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 07:38:08 -0500

48 lines

Re: Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:02:19 -0700

26 lines

Re: Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:18:22 -0800

40 lines

Re: Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:27:31 -0000

33 lines

Re: Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Shirley Baker-Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:39:27 -0800

95 lines

Re: Commas, was JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:34:44 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

Daniel's Alternate WTC temperament script Interpretation FINAL RE-POST

Daniel's Alternate WTC temperament script Interpretation FINAL RE-POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:32:19 -0800

164 lines

New Thread

des remous douces

des remous douces

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 20:40:41 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

Electronic Anathema

Electronic Anathema

Fred Craven <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:01:37 -0600

56 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:37:56 -0500

41 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:36:24 EST

50 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:59:47 -0500

17 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 21:10:23 -0000

63 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:58:10 EST

24 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:04:42 -0600

30 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 00:57:14 EST

36 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 10:08:54 -0500

29 lines

Re: Electronic Anathema

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 08:18:56 -0700

101 lines

New Thread

filth

filth

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:52:39 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

fractions of comma

fractions of comma

Thomas Glueck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Feb 2007 22:16:02 +0100

58 lines

New Thread

FW: Was JSB left-handed?

FW: Was JSB left-handed?

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 20:13:01 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

gardening with polygons

gardening with polygons

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:06:32 +0200

28 lines

Re: gardening with polygons

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:29:52 -0500

59 lines

Re: gardening with polygons

Linda Dowden <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 13:36:44 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

Grimaldi

Grimaldi

Fabrizio Acanfora <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 17:50:14 +0100

39 lines

Re: Grimaldi

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 14:08:05 -0800

53 lines

Re: Grimaldi

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 18:03:35 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

Harpsipixlist?

Harpsipixlist?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 17:33:49 +0100

17 lines

Re: Harpsipixlist?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 12:34:10 -0500

23 lines

Re: Harpsipixlist?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 19:20:12 +0100

27 lines

Re: Harpsipixlist?

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 15:03:13 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Hi all,

Hi all,

Fabrizio Acanfora <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2005 13:58:52 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

hipkins

hipkins

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 20:31:11 +0100

27 lines

Re: hipkins

Lee S Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 15:54:50 -0500

37 lines

Re: hipkins

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 21:14:50 +0000

36 lines

Re: hipkins

Mimi Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 06:39:44 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

Hipkins / Broadwood

Hipkins / Broadwood

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 20:39:36 +1100

34 lines

New Thread

hipkins piano history

hipkins piano history

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 23:27:32 +1100

14 lines

Re: hipkins piano history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2005 14:28:43 -0700

22 lines

Re: hipkins piano history

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 07:13:37 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Historic practice and television

Historic practice and television

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 11:04:08 +0000

41 lines

Re: Historic practice and television

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 12:29:57 +0100

21 lines

Re: Historic practice and television

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 08:45:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: Historic practice and television

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2005 09:00:40 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Holism

Holism

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:43:18 -0700

17 lines

Re: Holism

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:43:10 -0500

40 lines

Re: Holism

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:17:05 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

hpschd in Texas

hpschd in Texas

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 14:45:30 GMT

13 lines

Re: hpschd in Texas

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 20:19:49 -0600

36 lines

Re: hpschd in Texas

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 19:41:16 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

Hunter S. Thompson

Hunter S. Thompson

Daniel Lindblom <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 10:56:54 EST

23 lines

New Thread

I dream of drilling holes!

I dream of drilling holes!

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2005 06:32:58 -0800

43 lines

Re: I dream of drilling holes!

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:34:58 EST

20 lines

New Thread

Insurance

Insurance

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 22:16:22 -0000

23 lines

Re: Insurance

M. G. Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:11:33 -0000

54 lines

New Thread

jacksprings

jacksprings

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:51:17 +0200

43 lines

Re: jacksprings

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 07:18:33 +0000

30 lines

Re: jacksprings

willem vanderberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:16:32 -0800

27 lines

Re: jacksprings

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:38:54 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

joussance and bloom

joussance and bloom

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 17:53:33 +0200

52 lines

Re: joussance and bloom

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2005 19:06:04 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

JS Bach's tuning

JS Bach's tuning

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:47:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 11:45:52 -0800

61 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:18:17 -0800

110 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:21:16 -0800

106 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning

Loren Carle <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:57:18 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2005 22:30:29 -0800

113 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:09:17 -0500

68 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 07:12:10 -0800

108 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 09:39:46 -0800

108 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 17:05:44 -0500

25 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 14:19:49 -0800

54 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:40:37 -0800

51 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 15:43:53 -0800

76 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 16:05:05 -0800

34 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 18:31:20 -0800

54 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 19:53:49 -0800

79 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:23:44 -0800

124 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 21:49:12 -0800

147 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:02:54 -0800

37 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 22:07:01 -0800

39 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:39:34 +0100

11 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 06:02:51 -0500

25 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:30:07 -0500

19 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 02:00:25 -0500

26 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Shirley Baker-Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 20:39:57 -0800

61 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 22:05:05 -0800

70 lines

New Thread

JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST: comma

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST: comma

Shirley Baker-Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:08:03 -0800

168 lines

Re: JS Bach's tuning CORRECTED POST: comma

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2005 23:51:46 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

Kirkpatrick

Kirkpatrick

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2005 22:02:15 -0600

58 lines

New Thread

left-handedness

left-handedness

Derek G Bevan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 06:56:45 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

List shirts

List shirts

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:13:52 -0600

24 lines

Re: List shirts

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:33:26 -0500

32 lines

Re: List shirts

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 21:53:33 -0500

15 lines

Re: List shirts

L. T. Pirolli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:38:12 EST

11 lines

Re: List shirts

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 14:20:46 -0500

39 lines

Re: List shirts

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2005 05:37:11 -0800

35 lines

Re: List shirts

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2005 17:15:46 +0200

15 lines

Re: List shirts

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 14:29:49 -0500

19 lines

Re: List shirts

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 15:32:01 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

List shirts bust

List shirts bust

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 10:13:52 -0600

21 lines

Re: List shirts bust

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2005 22:17:30 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

List shirts, caps available again!

List shirts, caps available again!

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 16:37:44 -0600

80 lines

New Thread

List shirts--Idea ?

Re: List shirts--Idea ?

Patrick Frye III <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:04:50 -0500

52 lines

Re: List shirts--Idea ?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 15:09:00 -0500

19 lines

Re: List shirts--Idea ?

Hinrich <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 13:07:54 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Looking for Saturnino Cisneros

Looking for Saturnino Cisneros

Fabian Mohr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 09:42:25 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

MHKS/SEHKS Bach conference in March

MHKS/SEHKS Bach conference in March

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 15:43:57 -0600

35 lines

Re: MHKS/SEHKS Bach conference in March

Shirley Baker-Thomas <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 00:23:37 -0800

64 lines

Re: MHKS/SEHKS Bach conference in March

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 09:54:53 -0500

80 lines

New Thread

More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and 24ths solutions

More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and 24ths solutions

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:19:42 -0800

76 lines

Re: More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and 24ths solutions

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 03:21:20 -0500

55 lines

Re: More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and 24ths solutions

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:48:12 -0800

84 lines

Re: More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and 24ths solutions

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 10:18:32 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and24thssolutions

Re: More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and24thssolutions

Thomas Glueck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 14:32:09 +0100

118 lines

Re: More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and24thssolutions

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 09:27:07 -0500

25 lines

Re: More Bach WTC tuning scrip interpretations: 18ths and24thssolutions

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 06:52:05 -0800

40 lines

New Thread

no trained birds

no trained birds

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:16:31 -0500

32 lines

Re: no trained birds

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 09:41:14 -0800

89 lines

no trained birds

Anna Vriend <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 22:36:47 +0000

27 lines

Re: no trained birds

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 20:54:29 -0500

32 lines

Re: no trained birds

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 05:28:14 +0200

34 lines

Re: no trained birds

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 08:19:44 +0100

22 lines

Re: no trained birds

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 07:51:18 +0000

21 lines

Re: no trained birds

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 16:04:30 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

ot: sinister minority

ot: sinister minority

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 16:28:12 +0200

72 lines

New Thread

paper organists playing pre-composed music

paper organists playing pre-composed music

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:36:43 -0500

85 lines

paper organists playing pre-composed music

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:11:15 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

pedagogy / right and left

pedagogy / right and left

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 17:19:56 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Pedagogy before 1750 or pedagogy of improvisation, transposition, WTC, French Ouverture and stuff

Re: Pedagogy before 1750 or pedagogy of improvisation, transposition, WTC, French Ouverture and stuff

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:53:48 +0100

247 lines

Re: Pedagogy before 1750 or pedagogy of improvisation, transposition, WTC, French Ouverture and stuff

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:49:15 -0500

67 lines

Re: Pedagogy before 1750 or pedagogy of improvisation, transposition, WTC, French Ouverture and stuff

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 17:02:17 +0100

37 lines

Re: Pedagogy before 1750 or pedagogy of improvisation, transposition, WTC, French Ouverture and stuff

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 13:01:24 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Pedagogy [was Re: right and left]

Pedagogy [was Re: right and left]

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:46:11 EST

25 lines

New Thread

Peter B's book

Peter B's book

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 18:12:58 +0200

15 lines

Re: Peter B's book

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 09:11:05 -0700

30 lines

Re: Peter B's book

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 08:29:35 -0800

56 lines

Re: Peter B's book

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:34:44 -0000

34 lines

Re: Peter B's book

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 12:35:59 -0700

68 lines

Re: Peter B's book

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:24:41 -0500

26 lines

Re: Peter B's book

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:09:11 -0700

38 lines

Re: Peter B's book

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:46:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: Peter B's book

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 23:32:35 -0700

38 lines

Re: Peter B's book

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 10:22:13 -0500

30 lines

Re: Peter B's book

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:10:11 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

PIPORG-L logo

PIPORG-L logo

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 18:26:47 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

Possibly a dumb question

Possibly a dumb question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 20:51:57 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

progress: the sword cuts both ways

progress: the sword cuts both ways

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:08:20 -0500

24 lines

Re: progress: the sword cuts both ways

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 01:05:10 +0200

37 lines

Re: progress: the sword cuts both ways

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 13:04:09 -0500

56 lines

Re: progress: the sword cuts both ways

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 12:27:46 -0700

66 lines

Re: progress: the sword cuts both ways

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 18:07:34 -0500

26 lines

Re: progress: the sword cuts both ways

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 15:30:54 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

quill source?

quill source?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 16:08:30 +0200

19 lines

New Thread

re. woowooism

re. woowooism

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:13:05 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

right and left

right and left

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 15:30:04 +0200

23 lines

Re: right and left

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 06:35:57 -0700

64 lines

Re: right and left

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 08:36:14 EST

42 lines

Re: right and left

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:56:04 +0100

24 lines

Re: right and left

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 09:40:51 -0600

57 lines

Re: right and left

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 13:04:42 -0500

40 lines

Re: right and left

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:28:53 -0500

14 lines

Re: right and left

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:57:23 EST

24 lines

Re: right and left

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:05:24 -0500

52 lines

Re: right and left

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:52:17 EST

34 lines

Re: right and left

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:51:02 -0500

20 lines

Re: right and left

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 22:06:24 -0700

15 lines

right and left

alex <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 21:45:05 -0800

26 lines

Re: right and left

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 04:35:56 -0500

41 lines

Re: right and left

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:19:58 +0000

23 lines

Re: right and left

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:47:37 -0500

32 lines

Re: right and left

Colin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 14:34:32 +0100

27 lines

Re: right and left

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 09:14:23 -0500

24 lines

Re: right and left

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:15:19 +0000

20 lines

Re: right and left

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 07:27:37 -0800

23 lines

Re: right and left

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:13:10 -0500

44 lines

Re: right and left

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:18:50 -0500

29 lines

Re: right and left

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:25:23 +0100

12 lines

Re: right and left

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:18:27 -0500

34 lines

Re: right and left

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:17:22 -0500

26 lines

Re: right and left

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:02:44 -0500

26 lines

Re: right and left

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 22:41:44 -0500

31 lines

Re: right and left

David Bedlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 19:55:12 -0000

51 lines

New Thread

right and left (long; sorry!)

Re: right and left (long; sorry!)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 11:31:34 -0500

110 lines

New Thread

Right vs. Left

Right vs. Left

Gregory Crowell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 15:30:32 -0500

12 lines

Re: Right vs. Left

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 16:03:38 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Rod Regier article

Rod Regier article

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 07:43:52 -0500

19 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 08:34:43 -0500

22 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:04:36 -0500

29 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:39:51 -0500

41 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:43:22 -0500

25 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 10:55:22 -0500

37 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:15:11 -0500

45 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 11:15:29 -0500

15 lines

Re: Rod Regier article

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2005 17:54:44 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

schismas

schismas

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 14:23:40 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Silbermann's way of tuning

Re: Silbermann's way of tuning

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:38:54 -0500

79 lines

Re: Silbermann's way of tuning

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 11:48:57 -0500

31 lines

Re: Silbermann's way of tuning

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:32:02 -0500

15 lines

Re: Silbermann's way of tuning

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:12:08 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Sorge 1758

Sorge 1758

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:59:25 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Southwell Portapiano

Southwell Portapiano

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2005 12:35:06 -0800

30 lines

New Thread

strange materials

strange materials

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:55:57 +0200

40 lines

Re: strange materials

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 23:22:29 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Sussi

Sussi

Kelzenberg, David C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 09:03:52 -0600

23 lines

New Thread

temporal fission

temporal fission

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:35:39 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

temporal issues in music

temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 16:13:08 -0700

28 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:04:45 -0500

45 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:20:10 -0700

16 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:23:14 -0700

15 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:52:34 -0700

47 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:57:36 -0700

16 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 12:28:17 -0500

46 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 09:46:21 -0800

42 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 11:02:13 -0700

27 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 14:23:40 -0700

59 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 17:08:45 -0700

17 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 16:35:05 -0800

42 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

jonathan stuchell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 19:57:12 -0500

41 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 18:26:50 -0700

63 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

Buddy <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 21:14:12 -0800

23 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 04:05:55 -0500

45 lines

Re: temporal issues in music

Ray Ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 00:35:31 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

tfel dna thgir

tfel dna thgir

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 01:27:25 +0200

16 lines

tfel dna thgir

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:20:36 -0500

22 lines

Re: tfel dna thgir

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 18:21:27 -0500

16 lines

tfel dna thgir

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 10:35:24 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

the big/little C

the big/little C

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 08:47:03 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

The Broadwood / Morley harpsichord on eBay -- redux

The Broadwood / Morley harpsichord on eBay -- redux

Thomas Kendall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2005 11:09:30 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

The dreaded ET

The dreaded ET

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:46:46 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

The dreaded ET and Silbermann

Re: The dreaded ET and Silbermann

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:04:59 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

The other way around (was: broadwood harpsichord on eBay)

The other way around (was: broadwood harpsichord on eBay)

Thomas Kendall <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2005 23:50:22 -0600

30 lines

Re: The other way around (was: broadwood harpsichord on eBay)

Linda Dowden <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 05:53:20 -0800

42 lines

Re: The other way around (was: broadwood harpsichord on eBay)

Anne Acker <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 14:34:15 +0000

39 lines

Re: The other way around (was: broadwood harpsichord on eBay)

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 19:13:26 -0500

21 lines

Re: The other way around (was: broadwood harpsichord on eBay)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 17:26:39 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

The truth about Well temperaments

The truth about Well temperaments

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 04:58:27 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

the WTC calligraphy

the WTC calligraphy

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:45:42 -0500

56 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 11:33:24 +0100

84 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:30:03 -0500

41 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:56:33 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 12:38:32 -0800

226 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:43:32 -0800

16 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 13:58:17 -0800

161 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 17:38:02 -0500

86 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 15:48:00 -0800

213 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:05:44 -0800

143 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:16:58 -0800

233 lines

Re: the WTC calligraphy plus Alternate Interpretation

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 16:59:31 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

The WTC Scrawl

The WTC Scrawl

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2005 21:53:02 -0500

21 lines

The WTC Scrawl

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 11:40:39 -0500

116 lines

Re: The WTC Scrawl

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:31:33 -0500

39 lines

Re: The WTC Scrawl

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2005 16:59:17 -0500

52 lines

Re: The WTC Scrawl

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 09:26:41 +0100

31 lines

Re: The WTC Scrawl

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 22:09:43 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

thwarted by progress

thwarted by progress

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 19:22:36 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

TPW Delin Spinet progress

Re: TPW Delin Spinet progress

Dan Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:54:15 -0500

51 lines

Re: TPW Delin Spinet progress

Dan Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2005 14:58:55 -0500

93 lines

New Thread

tuner

tuner

randolph white <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 16:46:49 -0000

13 lines

Tuner

randolph white <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2005 16:38:06 -0000

13 lines

New Thread

venetian virginal progress report

venetian virginal progress report

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 20:23:15 +0200

38 lines

Re: venetian virginal progress report

Linda Dowden <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2005 12:04:14 -0800

50 lines

Re: venetian virginal progress report

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 00:25:12 +0200

24 lines

venetian virginal progress report

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2005 17:11:55 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

vermeer's music

vermeer's music

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2005 04:39:00 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

Was JSB left-handed?

Was JSB left-handed?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:57:40 -0500

18 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:43:32 -0500

24 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

C. E Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 16:15:57 -0600

57 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:31:39 +0000

23 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:40:41 +0000

33 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 19:29:06 -0500

27 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2005 08:40:44 +1000

46 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 10:54:23 -0500

23 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 19:17:48 +0200

29 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 13:54:47 +0000

42 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 14:28:21 -0500

38 lines

Was JSB left-handed?

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 21:53:48 +0100

52 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2005 00:29:19 +0200

24 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 17:47:17 +0000

46 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:19:06 -0500

41 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:34:32 -0500

37 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Agnes Armstrong <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 18:49:28 EST

38 lines

Re: Was JSB left-handed?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2005 23:57:34 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Well temperament or what?

Well temperament or what?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 10:42:12 -0800

142 lines

Re: Well temperament or what?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 14:43:08 -0500

64 lines

Re: Well temperament or what?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:52:33 -0700

36 lines

Re: Well temperament or what?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:02:30 -0800

94 lines

Re: Well temperament or what?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 13:09:02 -0800

55 lines

Re: Well temperament or what?

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 17:39:55 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

well tempered clavichords in Gard?

well tempered clavichords in Gard?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 00:45:58 +0200

19 lines

New Thread

Why do the Nations so furiously rage Together?

Why do the Nations so furiously rage Together?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 03:09:09 -0800

19 lines

Re: Why do the Nations so furiously rage Together?

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2005 15:27:52 +0200

62 lines

Re: Why do the Nations so furiously rage Together?

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2005 08:34:09 +1000

32 lines

New Thread

willem kroesbergen / stephanini

willem kroesbergen / stephanini

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2005 21:52:06 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

wood identification

wood identification

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 21:24:12 +1100

17 lines

New Thread

woowoo

woowoo

Brad Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:07:43 -0500

37 lines

Re: woowoo

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:18:35 +0000

26 lines

New Thread

woowooism

woowooism

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 08:33:45 -0700

16 lines

Re: woowooism

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2005 23:44:19 -0500

34 lines

Re: woowooism

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 00:40:17 -0500

35 lines

Re: woowooism

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 02:38:59 -0500

50 lines

Re: woowooism

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 03:38:02 -0500

22 lines

Re: woowooism

Julian Holman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 15:19:32 +0200

52 lines

Re: woowooism

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 07:46:47 -0700

34 lines

Re: woowooism

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 08:14:08 -0700

58 lines

Re: woowooism

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 11:19:26 -0500

42 lines

Re: woowooism

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:11:48 -0500

21 lines

Re: woowooism

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 13:00:30 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

woowooism not any more (and never again)

woowooism not any more (and never again)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2005 16:01:41 -0500

17 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu