LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2004


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

...about "Art" (3 messages)
2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards (21 messages)
2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards, (3 messages)
<No subject> (4 messages)
A new harpsichord for the Singapore Symphony (1 message)
A trip to London (5 messages)
Bach descendant (9 messages)
bargin on ebay (12 messages)
Basis of loudness (3 messages)
beats (38 messages)
Beckerleg, another neglected builder (was Kater) (3 messages)
Beebe on Temperaments (2 messages)
Books (6 messages)
Box guides (3 messages)
box registers (6 messages)
Box slides (5 messages)
Broadwood case for sale on ebay (2 messages)
broken legs help (5 messages)
builders in Pittsburgh? (1 message)
Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la) (10 messages)
Castel San Pietro Seminar (1 message)
cents and beats (1 message)
CHALLIS (3 messages)
Clavichord ad (1 message)
Corelli (6 messages)
Corelli editions (1 message)
cross-posted off-topic cry for help (2 messages)
Density of delrin, or something else? (9 messages)
Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant (7 messages)
Electronic Tuners (41 messages)
Electronic tuning devices (6 messages)
Enrico Baiano's Recital (4 messages)
Flangelation (3 messages)
Fpo needed in Oklahoma City (1 message)
Francis Tregian and the Fitwilliam Virginal Book, was Enrico Baiano's Recital (2 messages)
Gizmos (1 message)
Harmoniques II (1 message)
harpsichord + malfunctioning chainsaw? (2 messages)
harpsichord identification (5 messages)
Harpsichord Needed NYC (7 messages)
Help (2 messages)
Here's How to Unsubscribe--and more (1 message)
How the HELL do I unsubscribe? (2 messages)
How the HELL do you unsubscribe? (6 messages)
hpschd toolbox question (22 messages)
Hubbard Double kits (1 message)
humidifier question (2 messages)
Humor for the day (2 messages)
Instrument covers (1 message)
Is tuning a science or and art? (21 messages)
Is tuning a science or and art? CHALLIS (3 messages)
jonte knif (2 messages)
Kater (2 messages)
Kater aftershocks (3 messages)
Korg MT-1200 test results (1 message)
Koster Articles (3 messages)
Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord (4 messages)
London recitals, including two by G. Leonhardt (1 message)
Looking for Hugh Aston pieces (1 message)
looking for Ten Pieces by Hugh Aston (1 message)
Maendler-Schramm (2 messages)
Maendler-Schramm matching (3 messages)
Medieval Vocal Intonation (3 messages)
MHKS, was Re: Tuning harpsichords (1 message)
millers falls no 8 question (1 message)
modern times (1 message)
New CD of Lebègue Suites (1 message)
new recording (2 messages)
new website (3 messages)
No Subject (1 message)
Noble fir (1 message)
NY/CT Haprsihcord concerts (1 message)
OLDEST HARPSICHORDS INFO>REVISION (1 message)
Only in Kentucky (6 messages)
phase (1 message)
Pitch question (2 messages)
Quills (2 messages)
recent voicing observations, also quills (1 message)
Scarlatti K.315 (5 messages)
Science or art? Blather or crock? (3 messages)
Seminar on Hearing Damage in Amsterdam (1 message)
Sigurbjornsson piece (was Re: Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord) (2 messages)
slip gauges (1 message)
Smithsonian collection? (2 messages)
somewhat O.T. fortepiano info request (2 messages)
soundboard repair (5 messages)
Soundboard split (1 message)
Spectrum Analyzer for a PC (4 messages)
strings (1 message)
Tallis, was Re: Tune (2 messages)
This is interesting (3 messages)
TLA electronic tuner versus Korg and other? (2 messages)
Trevor Pinnock on BBC Early Music Show (1 message)
Tune (6 messages)
Tuning (4 messages)
Tuning harpsichords (1 message)
Upcoming Harpsichord Recital - On a Neupert Bach (3 messages)
Update on Clavichord Composition Awards from the British Clavichord Society (1 message)
Veracini sonatas (1 message)
Violab tuner (1 message)
Wanted: guinea pig (proefkonijntje) w/Korg OT-12 (2 messages)
Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12 (14 messages)
warm/cold humidifiers? (3 messages)
Was Alienor, now completely off-track! (5 messages)
WHOOPS (1 message)
Wolfgang Kater (8 messages)
WTC 1 e minor with acceleration (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

...about "Art"

...about "Art"

Philip Bayles <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:58:41 -0800

68 lines

Re: ...about "Art"

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:15:57 -0800

144 lines

Re: ...about "Art"

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:43:45 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:13:39 -0800

64 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:19:53 -0500

37 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 00:21:38 -0500

64 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 00:47:59 -0500

30 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:36:16 -0500

22 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:13:23 -0500

30 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:27:12 -0800

92 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 13:39:15 -0500

78 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Schmitz, Micaela <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 19:55:42 -0000

48 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:20:55 -0500

50 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 11:52:09 -0500

28 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:47:19 +0100

35 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 12:04:24 -0500

27 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:58:38 -0800

79 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 09:44:26 -0800

26 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 15:51:04 -0500

26 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 10:07:42 -0500

62 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 17:30:58 -0500

23 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:29:09 -0800

41 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 09:09:29 -0600

42 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:05:34 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards,

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards,

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2004 20:21:03 -0500

40 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards,

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:04:33 +0100

57 lines

Re: 2004 Alienor Harpsichord Composition Awards,

lcarle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 13:42:56 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:17:30 -0500

12 lines

<No subject>

Grant O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:34:56 +0000

26 lines

<No subject>

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 15:49:01 -0600

35 lines

<No subject>

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:05:35 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

A new harpsichord for the Singapore Symphony

A new harpsichord for the Singapore Symphony

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 10:50:50 +1100

71 lines

New Thread

A trip to London

A trip to London

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 02:40:44 +0100

22 lines

Re: A trip to London

Albert Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 09:33:13 +0100

43 lines

Re: A trip to London

Schmitz, Micaela <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:17:52 -0000

38 lines

Re: A trip to London

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 07:31:04 -0500

15 lines

Re: A trip to London

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:26:13 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

Bach descendant

Bach descendant

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:34:02 -0500

12 lines

Re: Bach descendant

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:04:55 -0500

17 lines

Re: Bach descendant

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:46:49 -0600

19 lines

Re: Bach descendant

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:15:29 -0500

27 lines

Re: Bach descendant

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:55:19 -0500

49 lines

Re: Bach descendant

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:59:44 -0500

25 lines

Re: Bach descendant

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:06:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: Bach descendant

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:53:21 -0500

34 lines

Re: Bach descendant

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:02:36 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

bargin on ebay

bargin on ebay

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 21:37:55 +1100

14 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:22:27 -0500

27 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 01:02:38 +1100

34 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:44:59 -0500

23 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Thomas Zachacz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:03:36 -0500

11 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:57:27 -0500

20 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:44:40 -0500

23 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Thomas Zachacz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:13:42 -0500

12 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:22:16 -0500

30 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Thomas Zachacz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:28:39 -0500

12 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:35:04 -0800

43 lines

Re: bargin on ebay

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 12:26:49 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Basis of loudness

Basis of loudness

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 15:53:18 -0700

23 lines

Re: Basis of loudness

David J. Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 20:39:46 -0600

42 lines

Re: Basis of loudness

Nick Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 08:19:05 -0800

66 lines

New Thread

beats

beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 13:07:38 -0700

29 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 10:00:38 -0700

68 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:41:11 -0700

21 lines

Re: beats

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:48:07 -0500

44 lines

Re: beats

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 12:49:10 -0500

23 lines

Re: beats

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:31:43 -0500

13 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 11:36:54 -0700

30 lines

Re: beats

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:00:27 -0500

80 lines

Re: beats

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:17:37 -0500

26 lines

Re: beats

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:28:59 -0500

27 lines

Re: beats

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:36:44 -0500

24 lines

Re: beats

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:52:41 +0000

37 lines

Re: beats

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:39:52 -0500

30 lines

Re: beats

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 15:08:08 +0000

57 lines

Re: beats

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:02:25 -0500

39 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 10:47:51 -0700

76 lines

Re: beats

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:22:58 +0100

43 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:16:35 -0700

27 lines

Re: beats

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 21:38:04 +0000

21 lines

Re: beats

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 16:02:56 -0500

47 lines

Re: beats

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 19:42:55 -0500

18 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 20:23:11 -0700

13 lines

Re: Beats

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 01:46:14 -0500

23 lines

Re: beats

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 03:19:09 -0500

21 lines

Re: beats

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 04:14:36 -0500

29 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 19:30:16 -0700

50 lines

Re: beats

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:52:15 +0000

95 lines

Re: beats

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:02:51 +0000

30 lines

Re: beats

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 10:06:56 +0000

37 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:52:34 -0700

53 lines

Re: beats

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:08:08 +0000

82 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:00:20 -0700

120 lines

Re: beats

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:37:09 -0800

67 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:31:51 -0700

21 lines

Re: beats

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:58:29 -0800

37 lines

Re: beats

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:06:01 -0500

11 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 15:01:43 -0700

50 lines

Re: beats

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 11:59:43 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Beckerleg, another neglected builder (was Kater)

Beckerleg, another neglected builder (was Kater)

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 11:55:28 -0800

98 lines

Re: Beckerleg, another neglected builder (was Kater)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:38:51 -0800

69 lines

Re: Beckerleg, another neglected builder (was Kater)

Altamiro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 23:01:04 -0300

28 lines

New Thread

Beebe on Temperaments

Beebe on Temperaments

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:48:32 -0500

84 lines

Re: Beebe on Temperaments

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 15:56:13 +1100

110 lines

New Thread

Books

Books

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 16:28:37 -0800

18 lines

Re: Books

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:06:38 +0100

33 lines

Re: Books

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:41:42 -0600

30 lines

Re: Books

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 10:09:54 -0600

41 lines

Re: Books

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 11:17:11 -0500

35 lines

Re: Books

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:37:50 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

Box guides

Box guides

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:07:05 +0100

26 lines

Re: Box guides

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:19:15 -0800

38 lines

Re: Box guides

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 07:10:09 +0100

56 lines

New Thread

box registers

box registers

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:22:39 -0500

42 lines

Re: box registers

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 21:23:24 EST

25 lines

Re: box registers

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 08:06:06 +0100

50 lines

Re: box registers

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:52:12 -0500

40 lines

Re: box registers

Lance Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 06:08:29 -0800

13 lines

Re: box registers

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 11:42:47 EST

15 lines

New Thread

Box slides

Box slides

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:19:14 +1000

17 lines

Re: Box slides

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 19:15:58 -0500

29 lines

Re: box slides

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:31:48 +0100

37 lines

Re: box slides

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 11:16:12 +0100

38 lines

Re: box slides

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 03:32:34 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

Broadwood case for sale on ebay

Broadwood case for sale on ebay

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 17:35:06 -0500

14 lines

Re: Broadwood case for sale on ebay

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 11:36:54 +1100

25 lines

New Thread

broken legs help

broken legs help

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:22:18 -0800

53 lines

Re: broken legs help

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:06:34 -0500

24 lines

Re: broken legs help

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 20:38:25 EST

16 lines

Re: broken legs help

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:38:24 -0700

20 lines

Re: broken legs help

Timothy S Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 12:03:46 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

builders in Pittsburgh?

builders in Pittsburgh?

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:06:45 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:27:40 +0100

24 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:42:43 +0100

59 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:47:17 -0500

21 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 16:16:46 -0500

38 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:36:25 +0100

80 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 22:37:21 +0100

77 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 23:15:07 +0100

21 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:09:19 +0100

32 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 00:55:24 EST

11 lines

Re: Byrd - Ut re mi (fa sol la)

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:06:41 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Castel San Pietro Seminar

Castel San Pietro Seminar

Grant O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 10:15:15 +0000

38 lines

New Thread

cents and beats

cents and beats

Buddy Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 17:40:17 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

CHALLIS

CHALLIS

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:34:52 -0500

44 lines

Re: CHALLIS

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:22:01 +0100

19 lines

Re: CHALLIS

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:19:33 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Clavichord ad

Clavichord ad

Schmitz, Micaela <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:50:46 -0000

28 lines

New Thread

Corelli

Corelli

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 14:11:12 -0700

13 lines

Re: Corelli

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 16:38:54 EST

21 lines

Re: Corelli

Saverio Lomartire <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 23:26:04 +0100

36 lines

Re: Corelli

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:35:05 -0500

20 lines

Re: Corelli

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 18:34:44 -0500

45 lines

Re: Corelli

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 23:41:45 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Corelli editions

Corelli editions

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 14:53:28 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

cross-posted off-topic cry for help

cross-posted off-topic cry for help

Margo Dillard <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:51:47 -0600

25 lines

Re: cross-posted off-topic cry for help

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:23:30 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Density of delrin, or something else?

Density of delrin, or something else?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:32:27 -0500

33 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 23:22:33 -0500

26 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 21:13:01 -0800

47 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 00:36:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 19:37:56 +1100

45 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 06:00:48 -0500

48 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 07:13:27 -0500

53 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 08:30:16 -0500

80 lines

Re: Density of delrin, or something else?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Feb 2004 09:50:18 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

Jarle Fagerheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:39:38 +0100

24 lines

Re: Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:57:26 -0500

26 lines

Re: Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:27:30 -0500

20 lines

Re: Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

David Hitchin <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:19:24 +0000

28 lines

Re: Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:52:07 -0500

39 lines

Re: Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

Jarle Fagerheim <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 23:45:01 +0100

32 lines

Re: Dupre Was: Re: Bach descendant

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:22:02 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

Electronic Tuners

Electronic Tuners

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 03:21:59 -0500

66 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:06:31 -0500

33 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:02:47 -0500

78 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:32:04 -0500

28 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:23:57 -0600

44 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Coello Servicio Técnico de Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:07:11 +0100

31 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Buddy Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:24:51 -0800

76 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Buddy Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 19:30:05 -0800

81 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 06:46:55 -0600

37 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 06:21:08 -0500

32 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:11:42 -0500

21 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 08:43:31 -0500

38 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:37:29 -0500

40 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:38:42 -0500

57 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:44:12 -0500

40 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:02:20 -0500

37 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:08:18 -0500

47 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 13:35:11 -0500

34 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:16:11 -0500

28 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 16:01:38 -0500

29 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:40:19 -0700

32 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 21:42:47 -0700

35 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Buddy Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 10:13:37 -0800

22 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 13:56:32 -0500

75 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:22:44 -0800

38 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 15:26:35 -0500

43 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:34:45 +0100

26 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 20:38:04 -0500

97 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Buddy Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:32:02 -0800

94 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:58:50 +0000

34 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 08:24:56 -0500

20 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 09:54:30 -0800

44 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 10:47:55 -0800

36 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:59:16 -0700

64 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:59:59 -0700

68 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 14:57:33 -0500

26 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 15:43:04 -0500

40 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:13:32 -0500

33 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 08:16:28 -0500

38 lines

Re: Electronic tuners

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 07:53:22 -0800

44 lines

Re: Electronic Tuners

Colin van der Lecq <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:06:42 +1100

19 lines

New Thread

Electronic tuning devices

Electronic tuning devices

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:19:05 -0500

149 lines

Re: Electronic tuning devices

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 13:02:59 -0700

31 lines

Re: Electronic tuning devices

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:46:10 -0800

59 lines

Re: Electronic tuning devices

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:58:55 -0700

67 lines

Re: Electronic tuning devices

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:01:16 -0500

82 lines

Re: Electronic tuning devices

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 17:11:01 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Enrico Baiano's Recital

Enrico Baiano's Recital

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Feb 2004 22:04:22 -0000

66 lines

Re: Enrico Baiano's Recital

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:12:17 +0100

24 lines

Re: Enrico Baiano's Recital

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:07:14 -0000

24 lines

Re: Enrico Baiano's Recital

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 18:29:43 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Flangelation

Flangelation

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:03:44 -0500

56 lines

Re: Flangelation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Feb 2004 15:31:30 -0700

22 lines

Re: Flangelation

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 02:44:17 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Fpo needed in Oklahoma City

Fpo needed in Oklahoma City

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 10:14:56 -0600

11 lines

New Thread

Francis Tregian and the Fitwilliam Virginal Book, was Enrico Baiano's Recital

Re: Francis Tregian and the Fitwilliam Virginal Book, was Enrico Baiano's Recital

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:45:30 -0000

60 lines

Re: Francis Tregian and the Fitwilliam Virginal Book, was Enrico Baiano's Recital

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:02:40 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Gizmos

Gizmos

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 09:01:06 -0000

32 lines

New Thread

Harmoniques II

Harmoniques II

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 04:50:10 -0500

10 lines

New Thread

harpsichord + malfunctioning chainsaw?

harpsichord + malfunctioning chainsaw?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:47:39 -0800

32 lines

Re: harpsichord + malfunctioning chainsaw?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 19:10:19 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

harpsichord identification

harpsichord identification

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:32:30 -0800

25 lines

Re: harpsichord identification

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 07:41:07 -0500

34 lines

Re: harpsichord identification

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:37:39 -0500

33 lines

Re: harpsichord identification

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 08:47:40 -0500

35 lines

Re: harpsichord identification

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 09:25:28 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Needed NYC

Harpsichord Needed NYC

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 21:12:46 -0500

14 lines

Re: Harpsichord Needed NYC

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:20:59 -0500

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord Needed NYC

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 23:21:45 -0800

15 lines

Re: Harpsichord Needed NYC

Thomas Zachacz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:18:13 -0500

10 lines

Re: Harpsichord Needed NYC

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 07:36:29 -0800

18 lines

Re: Harpsichord Needed NYC

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 18:41:38 -0600

21 lines

Re: Harpsichord Needed NYC

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 20:45:08 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Help

Help

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 11:06:44 -0000

23 lines

Re: Help

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:18:50 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

Here's How to Unsubscribe--and more

Here's How to Unsubscribe--and more

Kemer Thomson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 00:20:16 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

How the HELL do I unsubscribe?

Re: How the HELL do I unsubscribe?

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 08:59:27 -0600

18 lines

Re: How the HELL do I unsubscribe?

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 13:35:58 EST

28 lines

New Thread

How the HELL do you unsubscribe?

How the HELL do you unsubscribe?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:38:02 -0500

15 lines

Re: How the HELL do you unsubscribe?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:09:19 -0800

36 lines

Re: How the HELL do you unsubscribe?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:59:17 -0700

23 lines

Re: How the HELL do you unsubscribe?

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:50:16 -0500

22 lines

Re: How the HELL do you unsubscribe?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 18:01:46 -0500

17 lines

Re: How the HELL do you unsubscribe?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 19:11:42 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

hpschd toolbox question

hpschd toolbox question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:00:18 -0500

20 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 08:43:33 -0500

24 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:21:35 -0500

20 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:20:43 -0500

27 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:39:16 -0500

39 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:35:47 -0600

35 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 09:41:17 -0600

32 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:00:27 -0500

20 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:47:45 -0500

27 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 12:37:19 -0700

18 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Daniel Lindblom <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 10:21:11 EST

20 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 15:08:31 EST

22 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:53:27 +1000

19 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 05:13:47 -0500

30 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:33:57 -0500

40 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 12:11:41 -0700

20 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 17:14:59 -0500

36 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:31:09 -0600

49 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 07:22:06 +0100

54 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 09:07:49 -0500

29 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 03:01:11 -0500

85 lines

Re: hpschd toolbox question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:17:03 -0800

21 lines

New Thread

Hubbard Double kits

Hubbard Double kits

Ray Ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:06:40 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

humidifier question

humidifier question

Buddy Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 18:05:20 -0800

18 lines

humidifier question

Scheide, Kathleen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 07:53:13 -0600

20 lines

New Thread

Humor for the day

Humor for the day

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 19:13:25 -0600

11 lines

Re: Humor for the day

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Feb 2004 11:54:04 +0000

32 lines

New Thread

Instrument covers

Instrument covers

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:47:01 -0600

11 lines

New Thread

Is tuning a science or and art?

Is tuning a science or and art?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:53:50 -0000

56 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Elwood Doss <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 10:17:52 -0600

69 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:26:47 -0500

42 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 13:54:37 -0500

111 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:02:04 -0500

63 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 21:25:19 +0100

52 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 07:07:57 -0000

78 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 00:21:24 -0800

231 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:25:53 +0100

20 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

David J. Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:38:51 -0600

51 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:10:05 -0800

78 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:37:40 -0700

25 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:50:50 -0700

12 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 10:57:20 -0700

20 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 19:38:13 +0100

41 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 20:03:53 +0100

17 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 15:34:00 -0500

39 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 16:05:03 -0500

25 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

David J. Ritchie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 10:44:39 -0600

113 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 12:47:21 -0500

24 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 01:23:29 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Is tuning a science or and art? CHALLIS

Re: Is tuning a science or and art? CHALLIS

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:56:49 -0500

18 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art? CHALLIS

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:34:47 -0500

53 lines

Re: Is tuning a science or and art? CHALLIS

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 18:48:13 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

jonte knif

jonte knif

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 18:21:09 -0800

14 lines

Re: jonte knif

Andreas Edlund <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 09:18:50 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Kater

Kater

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 14:09:36 -0700

38 lines

Re: Kater

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 18:35:53 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Kater aftershocks

Kater aftershocks

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:56:42 -0700

21 lines

Re: Kater aftershocks

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:20:44 -0500

33 lines

Re: Kater aftershocks

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 09:35:52 -0700

34 lines

New Thread

Korg MT-1200 test results

Korg MT-1200 test results

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Feb 2004 06:16:22 -0500

98 lines

New Thread

Koster Articles

Koster Articles

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 20:13:08 -0600

12 lines

Re: Koster Articles

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 07:23:20 +0100

64 lines

Re: Koster Articles

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 04:19:26 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord

Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 21:29:04 -0800

106 lines

Re: Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 08:52:07 -0500

55 lines

Re: Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 21:52:36 +0100

37 lines

Re: Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Feb 2004 16:34:12 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

London recitals, including two by G. Leonhardt

London recitals, including two by G. Leonhardt

Judith Wardman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 09:02:02 -0500

53 lines

New Thread

Looking for Hugh Aston pieces

Looking for Hugh Aston pieces

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 08:47:07 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

looking for Ten Pieces by Hugh Aston

looking for Ten Pieces by Hugh Aston

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:13:55 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Maendler-Schramm

Maendler-Schramm

Thomas Zachacz <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:03:32 -0500

14 lines

Re: Maendler-Schramm

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 11:02:28 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Maendler-Schramm matching

Re: Maendler-Schramm matching

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 12:31:06 -0800

32 lines

Re: Maendler-Schramm matching

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 06:16:20 +0100

21 lines

Re: Maendler-Schramm matching

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 12:59:51 EST

26 lines

New Thread

Medieval Vocal Intonation

Medieval Vocal Intonation

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 07:22:06 -0500

48 lines

Re: Medieval Vocal Intonation

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 14:07:24 -0500

30 lines

Re: Medieval Vocal Intonation

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 18:57:26 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

MHKS, was Re: Tuning harpsichords

MHKS, was Re: Tuning harpsichords

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:23:55 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

millers falls no 8 question

millers falls no 8 question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 11:01:18 -0500

12 lines

New Thread

modern times

modern times

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 16:05:18 -0000

33 lines

New Thread

New CD of Lebègue Suites

New CD of Lebègue Suites

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:32:13 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

new recording

new recording

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 18:47:15 +0100

25 lines

Re: new recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Feb 2004 17:15:40 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

new website

new website

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:26:17 -0500

17 lines

Re: new website

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 20:34:13 -0600

30 lines

Re: new website

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 21:27:44 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

No Subject

Re: No Subject

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:22:58 EST

36 lines

New Thread

Noble fir

Noble fir

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 11:45:51 -0800

56 lines

New Thread

NY/CT Haprsihcord concerts

NY/CT Haprsihcord concerts

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:18:43 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

OLDEST HARPSICHORDS INFO>REVISION

OLDEST HARPSICHORDS INFO>REVISION

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 15:56:47 -0800

64 lines

New Thread

Only in Kentucky

Only in Kentucky

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:31:58 -0500

44 lines

Re: Only in Kentucky

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:53:16 -0500

59 lines

Re: Only in Kentucky

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:11:06 EST

43 lines

Re: Only in Kentucky

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:39:47 -0500

25 lines

Re: Only in Kentucky

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:43:49 -0500

16 lines

Re: Only in Kentucky

Micah Emler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 20:30:56 -0800

75 lines

New Thread

phase

phase

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 14:10:26 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Pitch question

Pitch question

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 15:00:19 -0000

32 lines

Re: Pitch question

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Feb 2004 13:31:39 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Quills

Quills

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 08:19:52 -0500

49 lines

Re: Quills

Grant O'Brien <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:36:38 +0000

40 lines

New Thread

recent voicing observations, also quills

recent voicing observations, also quills

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 12:08:51 -0500

101 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti K.315

Scarlatti K.315

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 22:39:30 -0600

11 lines

Re: Scarlatti K.315

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 00:03:59 -0500

27 lines

Re: Scarlatti K.315

Bruce Ritter <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 07:50:22 -0500

19 lines

Re: Scarlatti K.315

Frédéric Abel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Feb 2004 13:08:11 +0000

35 lines

Re: Scarlatti K.315

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 10:53:40 EST

18 lines

New Thread

Science or art? Blather or crock?

Science or art? Blather or crock?

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 12:06:53 -0800

109 lines

Re: Science or art? Blather or crock?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 14:55:05 -0700

169 lines

Re: Science or art? Blather or crock?

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 18:43:09 EST

42 lines

New Thread

Seminar on Hearing Damage in Amsterdam

Seminar on Hearing Damage in Amsterdam

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 04:03:46 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Sigurbjornsson piece (was Re: Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord)

Sigurbjornsson piece (was Re: Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord)

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2004 12:08:42 +0100

29 lines

Re: Sigurbjornsson piece (was Re: Ligeti and Reich on the harpsichord)

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Feb 2004 19:08:01 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

slip gauges

slip gauges

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 08:04:59 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

Smithsonian collection?

Smithsonian collection?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 13:20:11 -0500

19 lines

Re: Smithsonian collection?

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 10:44:27 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

somewhat O.T. fortepiano info request

somewhat O.T. fortepiano info request

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 09:04:52 -0500

18 lines

Re: somewhat O.T. fortepiano info request

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Feb 2004 06:43:14 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

soundboard repair

soundboard repair

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:05:46 -0800

22 lines

Re: soundboard repair

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 23:53:43 -0800

22 lines

Re: soundboard repair

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 08:00:02 -0000

35 lines

Re: soundboard repair

Saverio Lomartire <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 09:34:02 +0100

50 lines

Re: soundboard repair

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 04:46:39 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Soundboard split

Soundboard split

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 28 Feb 2004 13:16:55 -0000

33 lines

New Thread

Spectrum Analyzer for a PC

Spectrum Analyzer for a PC

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 07:16:13 EST

24 lines

Re: Spectrum Analyzer for a PC

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 09:58:31 -0700

38 lines

Re: Spectrum Analyzer for a PC

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 13:21:56 -0500

23 lines

Re: Spectrum Analyzer for a PC

Jacek Diakun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 10:18:32 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

strings

strings

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 19:09:29 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Tallis, was Re: Tune

Tallis, was Re: Tune

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:57:59 -0500

29 lines

Re: Tallis, was Re: Tune

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:27:59 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

This is interesting

This is interesting

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 02:14:26 -0500

12 lines

Re: This is interesting

Thomas Zachacz <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Feb 2004 10:54:56 -0500

13 lines

Re: This is interesting

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Mar 2004 09:30:52 +1000

26 lines

New Thread

TLA electronic tuner versus Korg and other?

TLA electronic tuner versus Korg and other?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 01:27:57 -0800

19 lines

Re: TLA electronic tuner versus Korg and other?

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 11:31:45 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

Trevor Pinnock on BBC Early Music Show

Trevor Pinnock on BBC Early Music Show

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 01:48:01 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Tune

Tune

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 17:23:53 -0800

12 lines

Re: Tune

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 22:03:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: Tune

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Feb 2004 20:03:18 -0800

76 lines

Re: Tune

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 07:30:10 -0500

88 lines

Re: Tune

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 09:52:13 -0700

91 lines

Re: Tune

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Feb 2004 16:04:12 -0600

103 lines

New Thread

Tuning

Re: Tuning

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 11:48:23 -0800

112 lines

Re: Tuning

Dale Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 22:19:56 +0100

31 lines

Re: Tuning

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Feb 2004 23:43:36 +0100

40 lines

Re: Tuning

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Feb 2004 11:31:01 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

Tuning harpsichords

Tuning harpsichords

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 23:12:47 -0600

10 lines

New Thread

Upcoming Harpsichord Recital - On a Neupert Bach

Upcoming Harpsichord Recital - On a Neupert Bach

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 01:20:10 -0500

20 lines

Re: Upcoming Harpsichord Recital - On a Neupert Bach

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 13:49:19 -0500

42 lines

Re: Upcoming Harpsichord Recital - On a Neupert Bach

Thomas Zachacz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 14:42:33 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

Update on Clavichord Composition Awards from the British Clavichord Society

Update on Clavichord Composition Awards from the British Clavichord Society

Judith Wardman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 12:24:46 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Veracini sonatas

Veracini sonatas

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 08:43:56 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

Violab tuner

Violab tuner

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Feb 2004 15:41:42 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

Wanted: guinea pig (proefkonijntje) w/Korg OT-12

Wanted: guinea pig (proefkonijntje) w/Korg OT-12

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 04:51:08 -0500

29 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig (proefkonijntje) w/Korg OT-12

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 07:57:41 -0800

49 lines

New Thread

Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Peter Blackett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Feb 2004 13:23:27 +0000

34 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Coello Servicio Técnico de Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 22:23:29 +0100

64 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Nick Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 14:28:00 -0800

43 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 17:43:30 -0500

63 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:47:02 -0700

18 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 16:49:01 -0700

14 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 19:26:54 -0500

32 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Feb 2004 20:46:40 -0700

38 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:53:49 -0500

42 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 14:05:37 -0700

41 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 17:14:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Feb 2004 15:51:36 -0700

34 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Coello Servicio Técnico de Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 01:16:59 +0100

31 lines

Re: Wanted: guinea pig w/Korg OT-12

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 11:18:56 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

warm/cold humidifiers?

warm/cold humidifiers?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 04:56:53 -0800

26 lines

Re: warm/cold humidifiers?

Nick Gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 10:53:58 -0800

49 lines

Re: warm/cold humidifiers?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Feb 2004 17:43:38 -0800

70 lines

New Thread

Was Alienor, now completely off-track!

Was Alienor, now completely off-track!

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 08:34:37 -0500

51 lines

Re: Was Alienor, now completely off-track!

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 09:52:03 -0800

92 lines

Re: Was Alienor, now completely off-track!

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 12:46:32 -0500

20 lines

Re: Was Alienor, now completely off-track!

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 17:29:23 -0500

41 lines

Re: Was Alienor, now completely off-track!

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Feb 2004 17:51:59 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

WHOOPS

WHOOPS

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Feb 2004 08:12:45 -0000

16 lines

New Thread

Wolfgang Kater

Wolfgang Kater

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 11:47:04 -0700

14 lines

Re: Wolfgang Kater

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:04:18 -0800

51 lines

Re: Wolfgang Kater

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 12:07:24 -0800

21 lines

Re: Wolfgang Kater

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 15:56:30 -0500

31 lines

Re: Wolfgang Kater

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 19:35:37 -0500

27 lines

Re: Wolfgang Kater

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Feb 2004 22:12:39 -0700

44 lines

Re: Wolfgang Kater

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Feb 2004 06:56:03 +0100

24 lines

Wolfgang Kater

James Tyler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Feb 2004 13:34:25 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

WTC 1 e minor with acceleration

WTC 1 e minor with acceleration

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 19:47:04 -0500

25 lines

Re: WTC 1 e minor with acceleration

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Feb 2004 23:35:15 -0500

50 lines

Re: WTC 1 e minor with acceleration

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Feb 2004 10:18:10 -0500

31 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu