LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


September 2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

***** Re: Scansoft .pdf editor (2 messages)
***** Scansoft .pdf editor (1 message)
****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor (9 messages)
2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival (5 messages)
Alas, the poor neglected prelude (1 message)
Apology to PG music (2 messages)
back to violin fingers (1 message)
Beats and temperament research (1 message)
bizarre idea (2 messages)
Brookshire's French Suites reviewed in ARG (1 message)
buff stop (1 message)
Classical music label accepting submissions (1 message)
conceptual framework (24 messages)
conceptual framework, what we bear (1 message)
delusions (was experiments) (3 messages)
delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge (18 messages)
delusions etc (5 messages)
Eros and dust (off-topic) (4 messages)
error build up (1 message)
experiments (3 messages)
fonts for music (2 messages)
For Redstone (1 message)
Froberger Vol IV.1 (6 messages)
Fw: [SSCM-L] Call for Proposals: 2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival (1 message)
Fwd: theoretical fraud (5 messages)
GF Handel Temperament (1 message)
GF Handel Temperament? (1 message)
Good recordings of Perotin? (4 messages)
Gramophone review (8 messages)
Great book for temperament fanatics (7 messages)
Harpsichord for Sale - Double-Manual Transposing (1 message)
Harpsichord Teacher in Regina ??? (1 message)
instrument identification (2 messages)
Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it? (11 messages)
Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation (20 messages)
Key material for the ZHI Italian harpsichord (2 messages)
London Early music exhibition , 24th/26th oct 2003 (1 message)
Lovely Erard treble (1 message)
Lovely Erard treble (was offsets) (2 messages)
Lucky! (10 messages)
Maybe anyone want to sell Roland C-80 (digital harpsichord)? (1 message)
MIDI and temperaments (1 message)
Modern Harpsichord wanted (2 messages)
music as science (1 message)
Music for harpsichord & gamba? (3 messages)
My experiment (1 message)
nerds and tuning; was conceptual framework (2 messages)
new harpsichord owner (9 messages)
New Owner (17 messages)
New toy for temperament fanatics (17 messages)
noise and context (1 message)
offset tables etc. (21 messages)
offset tables, tuners etc. (14 messages)
One for the Guinness Book of Records? (1 message)
online antique harpsichord engravings? (1 message)
Oops (1 message)
Peacock feathers (2 messages)
Philadelphia (3 messages)
Physics question: fluid dynamics (11 messages)
post-modern (1 message)
post-modern [was offsets] (3 messages)
practical transposing of temperaments (9 messages)
published BWV 1004 transcription and other highlights (3 messages)
Purcell or Clarke? (1 message)
re the virginals on ebay (1 message)
Reference tones (1 message)
ruminations (1 message)
ruminations (visual depictions of temperaments) (3 messages)
Sad news from europe's heatwave (4 messages)
Scansoft .pdf editor (3 messages)
SDHS Opening Concerts (1 message)
seeking advise (6 messages)
Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe? (7 messages)
Sorry (1 message)
Soundboard warping (9 messages)
Still Here! ***** (1 message)
string noises (1 message)
subjective experience (14 messages)
Temperament for Medieval music, wasRe: Good recordings of Perotin? (1 message)
Temporary contact information (1 message)
Thanks (1 message)
Thanks for the inquiries (2 messages)
The Temperamental Mr. Purcell (1 message)
The ULTIMATE toy for temperament fanatics (5 messages)
visualization (1 message)
Waitzmann Book of Fenton House collection (1 message)
Werckmeister beat rates or comma fractions and his propaganda (1 message)
Werckmeister beat rates or comma fractions and his propaganda (correction) (2 messages)
What I hear, was delusions etc (1 message)
Wrong again! (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

***** Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

***** Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:54:07 -0400

53 lines

Re: ***** Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:45:27 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

***** Scansoft .pdf editor

Re: ***** Scansoft .pdf editor

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 09:52:13 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:14:02 +0200

34 lines

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:28:49 -0700

47 lines

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:09:14 -0600

28 lines

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:10:09 -0400

22 lines

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:56:13 -0600

20 lines

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 23:08:51 -0600

19 lines

****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 12:11:42 -0500

40 lines

Re: ****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

David Lakritz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:48:20 PDT

27 lines

Re: ****Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:04:26 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 16:10:31 -0400

33 lines

Re: 2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:30:37 -0400

19 lines

Re: 2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 19:59:23 -0700

36 lines

Re: 2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:04:17 -0500

27 lines

Re: 2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:19:02 -0700

52 lines

New Thread

Alas, the poor neglected prelude

Alas, the poor neglected prelude

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:08:39 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Apology to PG music

Apology to PG music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 18:52:12 -0600

55 lines

Re: Apology to PG music

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 22:27:19 -0600

12 lines

New Thread

back to violin fingers

back to violin fingers

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 17:10:26 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

Beats and temperament research

Beats and temperament research

Johan Norrback <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 12:44:29 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

bizarre idea

bizarre idea

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:40:18 -0600

25 lines

Re: bizarre idea

noel jones <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 22:42:03 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

Brookshire's French Suites reviewed in ARG

Brookshire's French Suites reviewed in ARG

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:48:49 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

buff stop

buff stop

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 14:42:53 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Classical music label accepting submissions

Classical music label accepting submissions

Bravo Recordings <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 16:13:09 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

conceptual framework

conceptual framework

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 09:44:58 -0600

22 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:53:16 -0400

59 lines

Re: conceptual framework

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:58:33 -0600

91 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 19:17:50 -0400

26 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 22:39:41 EDT

21 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:47:46 -0400

101 lines

Re: conceptual framework

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:36:58 -0600

39 lines

Re: conceptual framework

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 09:09:13 -0600

39 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:17:22 +0100

57 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:38:42 -0400

62 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:51:18 -0700

40 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:36:59 -0400

36 lines

Re: conceptual framework

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:46:48 -0600

61 lines

Re: conceptual framework

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:49:22 -0600

27 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 16:43:16 -0400

16 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 11:58:29 -0400

26 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:57:24 EDT

28 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:27:47 -0400

134 lines

Re: conceptual framework

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:08:03 -0500

32 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:41:13 +0100

47 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:15:40 -0400

43 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 13:26:54 -0400

19 lines

Re: conceptual framework

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:45:32 -0400

147 lines

Re: conceptual framework

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 19:04:11 -0500

72 lines

New Thread

conceptual framework, what we bear

Re: conceptual framework, what we bear

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:43:04 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

delusions (was experiments)

delusions (was experiments)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 04:32:42 -0400

41 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments)

Linda Dowden <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 05:43:58 -0700

50 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 08:58:41 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 16:51:41 +0200

142 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:35:19 -0400

39 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 09:30:22 -0600

24 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 12:20:20 -0400

42 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 13:00:20 -0400

98 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:08:29 +0200

41 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 06:39:50 -0400

52 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:17:56 -0600

29 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:08:58 -0400

44 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:54:22 -0600

27 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:18:35 -0400

43 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:53:06 -0400

47 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:05:19 -0600

82 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:08:22 -0600

22 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:13:29 -0600

15 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 15:44:53 -0400

22 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 17:19:58 -0400

89 lines

Re: delusions (was experiments), temperaments Bach Neidhardt Sorge

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:09:54 -0600

13 lines

New Thread

delusions etc

Re: delusions etc

Sloffer, Phillip C <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 09:39:36 -0500

20 lines

Re: delusions etc

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 15:05:43 -0600

59 lines

Re: delusions etc

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 04:27:55 -0400

66 lines

Re: delusions etc

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:13:04 +0200

21 lines

Re: delusions etc

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 16:05:08 -0600

44 lines

New Thread

Eros and dust (off-topic)

Eros and dust (off-topic)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:23:38 -0400

54 lines

Re: Eros and dust (off-topic)

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 17:45:30 -0700

61 lines

Re: Eros and dust (off-topic)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:46:47 -0400

90 lines

Re: Eros and dust (off-topic)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:48:02 -0600

14 lines

New Thread

error build up

error build up

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 13:06:12 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

experiments

experiments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:31:10 -0600

44 lines

Re: experiments

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 05:10:36 EDT

19 lines

Re: experiments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 08:25:53 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

fonts for music

fonts for music

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 14:58:51 +0200

47 lines

Re: fonts for music

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:21:03 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

For Redstone

For Redstone

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 18:54:40 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Froberger Vol IV.1

Froberger Vol IV.1

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 15:58:58 -0400

22 lines

Re: Froberger Vol IV.1

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 18:32:47 -0500

25 lines

Froberger Vol IV.1

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 11:51:13 +0200

32 lines

Re: Froberger Vol IV.1

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 08:21:13 -0400

32 lines

Re: Froberger Vol IV.1

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 16:59:42 +0200

22 lines

Re: Froberger Vol IV.1

Elizabeth Kuehner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:27:28 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Fw: [SSCM-L] Call for Proposals: 2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

Fw: [SSCM-L] Call for Proposals: 2004 Bloomington Early Music Festival

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:53:50 +0200

111 lines

New Thread

Fwd: theoretical fraud

Fwd: theoretical fraud

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:13:03 +0200

41 lines

Re: Fwd: theoretical fraud

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:35:06 -0600

73 lines

Re: Fwd: theoretical fraud

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 15:15:13 -0600

30 lines

Re: Fwd: theoretical fraud

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:24:30 -0400

74 lines

Re: Fwd: theoretical fraud

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 11:56:23 -0600

93 lines

New Thread

GF Handel Temperament

GF Handel Temperament

Herbert L. Huestis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 00:15:22 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

GF Handel Temperament?

Re: GF Handel Temperament?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 15:34:44 +0200

134 lines

New Thread

Good recordings of Perotin?

Good recordings of Perotin?

Nathan I Smutz <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 00:30:56 -0700

25 lines

Re: Good recordings of Perotin?

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 03:58:10 EDT

29 lines

Re: Good recordings of Perotin?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:31:05 -0500

23 lines

Re: Good recordings of Perotin?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:09:16 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Gramophone review

Gramophone review

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:14:18 -0500

20 lines

Re: Gramophone review

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:01:08 -0400

21 lines

Re: Gramophone review

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 08:45:55 -0700

39 lines

Re: Gramophone review

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:40:00 -0700

66 lines

Re: Gramophone review

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:57:00 -0500

60 lines

Re: Gramophone review

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 17:52:34 -0700

88 lines

Re: Gramophone review

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 23:18:06 -0400

28 lines

Re: Gramophone review

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:23:41 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Great book for temperament fanatics

Great book for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:59:37 -0400

29 lines

Re: Great book for temperament fanatics

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:19:30 -0600

38 lines

Re: Great book for temperament fanatics

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:14:17 -0500

89 lines

Re: Great book for temperament fanatics

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 16:34:00 -0400

43 lines

Re: Great book for temperament fanatics

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 20:17:25 -0500

51 lines

Re: Great book for temperament fanatics

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:49:54 -0600

13 lines

Re: Great book for temperament fanatics

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:02:41 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord for Sale - Double-Manual Transposing

Harpsichord for Sale - Double-Manual Transposing

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 21:31:51 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Teacher in Regina ???

Harpsichord Teacher in Regina ???

nick gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 22:05:15 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

instrument identification

instrument identification

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 19:39:08 -0700

19 lines

Re: instrument identification

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 00:52:36 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

Robin Bigwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:45:49 +0100

53 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 13:23:14 +0200

40 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:49:14 -0500

28 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:18:10 -0600

46 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:02:30 +0100

41 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 16:32:54 -0500

31 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 19:02:14 -0600

40 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:08:11 +0200

26 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 03:11:24 -0400

29 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:37:25 -0600

20 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 06:46:57 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Anne Beetem Harpsichords & Historic Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:08:46 -0400

38 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:10:24 -0400

56 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:36:16 -0400

40 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:11:14 -0600

13 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 20:35:12 EDT

40 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Anne Beetem Harpsichords & Historic Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:19:54 -0400

18 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:26:53 -0500

18 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:13:44 +0200

35 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:44:45 -0600

23 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 22:52:46 -0600

47 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:10:31 +0100

26 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Anne Beetem Harpsichords & Historic Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:02:03 -0400

18 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:41:23 -0500

49 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:44:55 -0400

31 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:55:01 -0400

34 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:14:52 -0500

46 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 10:15:14 -0400

26 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:21:34 -0600

17 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:18:55 -0400

22 lines

Re: Isacoff's _Temperament_ - read it?//Public misinformation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:01:10 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Key material for the ZHI Italian harpsichord

Key material for the ZHI Italian harpsichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 11:56:10 -0400

49 lines

Re: Key material for the ZHI Italian harpsichord

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 09:43:02 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

London Early music exhibition , 24th/26th oct 2003

London Early music exhibition , 24th/26th oct 2003

Peter Blackett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:14:47 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Lovely Erard treble

Re: Lovely Erard treble

Phillip Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 07:02:16 -0700

155 lines

New Thread

Lovely Erard treble (was offsets)

Lovely Erard treble (was offsets)

Phillip Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 13:35:35 -0700

49 lines

Re: Lovely Erard treble (was offsets)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 05:29:30 -0400

119 lines

New Thread

Lucky!

Lucky!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 14:38:35 -0800

36 lines

Re: Lucky!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 19:52:59 -0500

24 lines

Re: Lucky!

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 00:12:46 -0500

44 lines

Re: Lucky!

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 12:50:57 -0700

63 lines

Re: Lucky!

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:01:03 -0700

14 lines

Re: Lucky!

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:07:35 +0100

28 lines

Re: Lucky!

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 07:55:28 -0400

55 lines

Re: Lucky!

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 09:57:18 -0400

73 lines

Re: Lucky!

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 17:51:03 +0200

51 lines

Re: Lucky!

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 17:56:20 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

Maybe anyone want to sell Roland C-80 (digital harpsichord)?

Maybe anyone want to sell Roland C-80 (digital harpsichord)?

Jacek Diakun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2003 09:15:10 +0200

17 lines

New Thread

MIDI and temperaments

Re: MIDI and temperaments

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 02:19:31 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Modern Harpsichord wanted

Modern Harpsichord wanted

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 01:43:31 -0400

18 lines

Re: Modern Harpsichord wanted

Paul Novosel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 11:45:19 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

music as science

music as science

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 13:46:33 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

Music for harpsichord & gamba?

Music for harpsichord & gamba?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:59:19 -0700

20 lines

Re: Music for harpsichord & gamba?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 17:47:53 -0400

20 lines

Music for harpsichord & gamba?

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 09:21:38 EDT

22 lines

New Thread

My experiment

My experiment

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Sep 2003 09:07:39 -0600

49 lines

New Thread

nerds and tuning; was conceptual framework

Re: nerds and tuning; was conceptual framework

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 13:41:27 -0400

27 lines

Re: nerds and tuning; was conceptual framework

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 20:02:47 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

new harpsichord owner

new harpsichord owner

Hema M <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 22:12:28 -0400

23 lines

Re: new harpsichord owner

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 22:57:32 -0400

41 lines

Re: new harpsichord owner

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 12:34:32 -0400

247 lines

Re: new harpsichord owner

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:18:02 -0400

32 lines

Re: new harpsichord owner

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 13:41:30 -0400

43 lines

Re: new harpsichord owner

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 14:55:50 -0400

25 lines

Re: new harpsichord owner

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 23:28:36 -0700

26 lines

Re: new harpsichord owner

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 08:11:37 -0600

22 lines

New harpsichord owner

Matt Sharp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 17:23:10 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

New Owner

New Owner

Carolyn Jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:23:46 -0700

17 lines

Re: New Owner

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 11:49:36 -0700

24 lines

Re: New Owner

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:11:51 -0400

32 lines

Re: New Owner

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:27:55 -0400

18 lines

Re: New Owner

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 12:37:03 -0700

30 lines

Re: New Owner

Matt Sharp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:50:17 -0400

42 lines

Re: New Owner

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 15:48:19 -0400

25 lines

Re: New Owner

Diana Wright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 13:09:40 -0700

34 lines

Re: New Owner

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:54:21 -0400

17 lines

Re: New Owner

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:35:23 -0500

47 lines

Re: New Owner

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 00:31:26 -0700

40 lines

Re: New Owner

Anne Beetem Harpsichords & Historic Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:50:22 -0400

32 lines

Re: New Owner

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 07:36:52 -0500

37 lines

Re: New Owner

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:39:03 -0400

23 lines

Re: New Owner

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 17:27:40 -0500

32 lines

Re: New Owner

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:13:52 -0600

41 lines

Re: New Owner

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 20:16:33 -0600

12 lines

New Thread

New toy for temperament fanatics

New toy for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 08:56:34 -0400

27 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 17:46:48 -0600

62 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 04:40:59 -0400

63 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 11:57:43 +0200

52 lines

New toy for temperament fanatics

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:25:44 +0200

21 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 12:41:22 -0400

26 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 20:00:19 +0200

34 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 14:41:12 -0400

20 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 20 Sep 2003 18:41:25 -0400

22 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Sep 2003 00:04:30 -0400

37 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:15:53 -0400

20 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Sep 2003 01:21:15 -0400

22 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Sep 2003 08:44:42 -0400

22 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 21 Sep 2003 12:46:41 +0200

23 lines

New toy for temperament fanatics

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 10:57:47 -0400

24 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 11:23:31 -0400

30 lines

Re: New toy for temperament fanatics

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 20:47:53 -0400

39 lines

New Thread

noise and context

noise and context

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:47:07 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

offset tables etc.

offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:19:14 -0600

58 lines

offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:28:48 -0600

56 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:41:54 -0400

19 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 13:15:03 -0700

21 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 22:29:23 +0200

32 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:19:14 -0600

33 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:40:25 -0600

35 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 15:44:29 -0600

26 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:23:42 -0400

107 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:40:28 -0600

64 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:46:41 -0600

76 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:31:13 -0600

53 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:54:06 -0600

24 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 18:58:54 -0400

17 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 16:24:53 -0700

62 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:29:17 -0400

38 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 10:30:02 +0200

19 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 03:08:07 -0700

34 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:30:21 -0600

36 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 08:17:24 -0600

27 lines

Re: offset tables etc.

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 19:26:11 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

offset tables, tuners etc.

offset tables, tuners etc.

Sloffer, Phillip C <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 07:38:08 -0500

18 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:15:47 -0400

70 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 11:50:46 -0400

37 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 16:44:53 -0400

72 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 15:49:09 -0600

22 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 3 Sep 2003 18:51:34 -0400

21 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 03:36:57 -0400

34 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 04:43:57 -0400

90 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 08:39:49 -0400

31 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 09:11:24 -0700

63 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 07:32:05 -0400

58 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 09:22:40 -0600

26 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 18:08:10 +0200

102 lines

Re: offset tables, tuners etc.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 05:49:59 -0400

129 lines

New Thread

One for the Guinness Book of Records?

One for the Guinness Book of Records?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 18:48:58 -0400

16 lines

New Thread

online antique harpsichord engravings?

online antique harpsichord engravings?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 7 Sep 2003 00:44:26 -0400

13 lines

New Thread

Oops

Oops

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:10:21 -0400

13 lines

New Thread

Peacock feathers

Re: Peacock feathers

Martha N. Folts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 10:45:44 -0400

29 lines

Re: Peacock feathers

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 20:39:10 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Philadelphia

Philadelphia

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 11:07:58 -0500

16 lines

Re: Philadelphia

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 12:39:18 -0400

20 lines

Re: Philadelphia

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 9 Sep 2003 10:37:26 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

Physics question: fluid dynamics

Physics question: fluid dynamics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:50:15 -0400

26 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

The Kings <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2003 13:43:48 -0700

49 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2003 14:46:04 -0700

20 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 15 Sep 2003 17:07:40 -0600

34 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

Doug Brooke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 09:16:27 +1000

45 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 00:02:18 EDT

27 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:29:48 +1000

46 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 15:33:25 -0400

50 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 09:32:37 +1000

68 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 16 Sep 2003 21:52:47 -0400

54 lines

Re: Physics question: fluid dynamics

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 11:26:52 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

post-modern

Re: post-modern

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 17:04:44 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

post-modern [was offsets]

post-modern [was offsets]

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:52:57 -0400

32 lines

Re: post-modern [was offsets]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 21:42:36 +0200

38 lines

Re: post-modern [was offsets]

Phillip Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 13:17:44 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

practical transposing of temperaments

practical transposing of temperaments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 15:33:27 -0400

26 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:45:51 +0200

37 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2003 15:44:37 -0400

47 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2003 13:30:27 -0700

103 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:35:50 +0200

43 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 14:50:31 +0200

25 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 10:09:32 -0400

23 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 13:25:00 -0600

43 lines

Re: practical transposing of temperaments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 27 Sep 2003 22:47:53 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

published BWV 1004 transcription and other highlights

published BWV 1004 transcription and other highlights

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:01:16 -0400

24 lines

Re: published BWV 1004 transcription and other highlights

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Sep 2003 11:37:09 -0500

27 lines

Re: published BWV 1004 transcription and other highlights

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Sep 2003 13:29:02 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Purcell or Clarke?

Purcell or Clarke?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 11:05:16 EDT

31 lines

New Thread

re the virginals on ebay

re the virginals on ebay

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:02:35 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Reference tones

Reference tones

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:45:25 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

ruminations

ruminations

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 4 Sep 2003 10:20:22 -0600

71 lines

New Thread

ruminations (visual depictions of temperaments)

Re: ruminations (visual depictions of temperaments)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 12:08:20 -0400

79 lines

Re: ruminations (visual depictions of temperaments)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:12:30 -0600

28 lines

Re: ruminations (visual depictions of temperaments)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 11:35:34 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

Sad news from europe's heatwave

Sad news from europe's heatwave

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 12:57:03 -0400

13 lines

Re: Sad news from europe's heatwave

Olivier Fadini <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 2 Sep 2003 00:11:14 +0200

12 lines

Re: Sad news from europe's heatwave

Michael Huffman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 20:58:58 EDT

10 lines

Re: Sad news from europe's heatwave

Michael Huffman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 1 Sep 2003 21:39:17 EDT

10 lines

New Thread

Scansoft .pdf editor

Scansoft .pdf editor

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2003 08:59:32 -0600

23 lines

Scansoft .pdf editor

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 09:26:11 -0600

22 lines

Re: Scansoft .pdf editor

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 28 Sep 2003 11:20:20 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

SDHS Opening Concerts

SDHS Opening Concerts

Kemer Thomson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 5 Sep 2003 20:36:33 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

seeking advise

seeking advise

Buddy L Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 18:04:28 -0700

27 lines

Re: seeking advise

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 23 Sep 2003 21:38:30 -0700

54 lines

Re: seeking advise

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 02:20:47 -0400

45 lines

Re: seeking advise

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 08:56:34 -0500

56 lines

Re: seeking advise

djr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 09:13:12 -0500

57 lines

Re: seeking advise

Buddy L Collier <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 17:28:53 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

Jacek Diakun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 10:33:27 +0200

24 lines

Re: Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 04:24:39 -0700

52 lines

Re: Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 07:36:40 -0400

41 lines

Re: Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 18:40:31 -0400

33 lines

Re: Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 07:17:17 +0100

46 lines

Re: Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 18 Sep 2003 13:15:44 -0400

23 lines

Re: Shipping harpsichord from USA to Europe?

Hema M <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 10:00:37 -0400

70 lines

New Thread

Sorry

Sorry

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:35:45 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

Soundboard warping

Soundboard warping

Matt Sharp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 16:53:38 -0400

23 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 19:04:27 -0400

21 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

C. E. Hood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 18:38:24 -0500

33 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

Anne Beetem Harpsichords & Historic Pianos <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 21:09:39 -0400

38 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 06:05:27 +0200

19 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 09:05:25 -0400

32 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 08:33:33 -0600

40 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

Matt Sharp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 16:09:14 -0400

61 lines

Re: Soundboard warping

ABielefeldt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 30 Sep 2003 13:27:59 -0700

22 lines

New Thread

Still Here! *****

Still Here! *****

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:31:22 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

string noises

Re: string noises

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 17 Sep 2003 14:53:03 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

subjective experience

subjective experience

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:16:59 -0600

25 lines

Re: subjective experience

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:35:09 -0400

26 lines

Re: subjective experience

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:09:01 -0500

24 lines

Re: subjective experience

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:16:54 -0600

66 lines

Re: subjective experience

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 19:54:16 -0600

27 lines

Re: subjective experience

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 03:37:30 -0400

98 lines

Re: subjective experience

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 09:02:57 -0600

164 lines

Re: subjective experience

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 12:18:00 -0600

45 lines

Re: subjective experience

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 16:03:56 -0400

58 lines

Re: subjective experience

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:15:35 -0600

105 lines

Re: subjective experience

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 08:22:53 +0200

23 lines

Re: subjective experience

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 04:03:37 -0400

117 lines

Re: subjective experience

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:00:23 +0100

41 lines

Re: subjective experience

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 12 Sep 2003 10:22:24 -0600

206 lines

New Thread

Temperament for Medieval music, wasRe: Good recordings of Perotin?

Temperament for Medieval music, wasRe: Good recordings of Perotin?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 29 Sep 2003 08:39:20 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Temporary contact information

Temporary contact information

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 13 Sep 2003 14:57:41 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

Thanks

Thanks

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 07:51:02 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

Thanks for the inquiries

Thanks for the inquiries

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Sep 2003 10:39:18 +0200

24 lines

Re: Thanks for the inquiries

Martha N. Folts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 22 Sep 2003 11:47:26 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

The Temperamental Mr. Purcell

The Temperamental Mr. Purcell

noel jones <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 21:51:21 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

The ULTIMATE toy for temperament fanatics

The ULTIMATE toy for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:58:16 -0400

78 lines

Re: The ULTIMATE toy for temperament fanatics

Matt Sharp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 16:22:16 -0400

21 lines

Re: The ULTIMATE toy for temperament fanatics

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 24 Sep 2003 15:16:30 -0600

43 lines

Re: The ULTIMATE toy for temperament fanatics

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 25 Sep 2003 13:33:54 +0200

31 lines

Re: The ULTIMATE toy for temperament fanatics

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 26 Sep 2003 12:38:38 -0400

93 lines

New Thread

visualization

visualization

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 6 Sep 2003 10:04:12 -0600

56 lines

New Thread

Waitzmann Book of Fenton House collection

Waitzmann Book of Fenton House collection

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 14 Sep 2003 22:43:12 -0400

76 lines

New Thread

Werckmeister beat rates or comma fractions and his propaganda

Werckmeister beat rates or comma fractions and his propaganda

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 13:52:44 +0200

118 lines

New Thread

Werckmeister beat rates or comma fractions and his propaganda (correction)

Werckmeister beat rates or comma fractions and his propaganda (correction)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 14:07:46 +0200

44 lines

Re: Werckmeister beat rates or comma fractions and his propaganda (correction)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 10 Sep 2003 18:54:16 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

What I hear, was delusions etc

What I hear, was delusions etc

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 8 Sep 2003 08:45:49 -0600

142 lines

New Thread

Wrong again!

Wrong again!

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 19 Sep 2003 14:38:57 -0400

14 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu