LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


April 2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"playing-in" a brand new instrument (5 messages)
A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING) (7 messages)
A clearer view on string tails (7 messages)
A Handelian question (4 messages)
A Harpsichord Cupboard (1 message)
A Harpsichord Sideboard (5 messages)
A Harpsichord Sideboard.... (22 messages)
A Harpsichord Sideboard....end (10 messages)
A Harpsichord Sideboard....end of the mahogany (1 message)
A Harpsichord Sideboard....end x 2 (1 message)
A QUESTION FOR THE LIST (1 message)
all purpoaw hpschd (5 messages)
all purpose harpsichord? ruminating (28 messages)
all purpose hpschd (2 messages)
and indeed: Virginals (6 messages)
Another harpsichord recital in Tours (2 messages)
Antonio Valente (3 messages)
Antonio Valente 2 (3 messages)
apaling treatment (1 message)
are you a square head? (1 message)
Ars atque scientia (1 message)
Bach and NOT the clavichord (19 messages)
Bach and the clavichord ... again and again (5 messages)
Bach and the clavichord ... again? (5 messages)
Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt (6 messages)
Bach and the clavichord ... ask Stuart (3 messages)
Bach ans sons and clavichord (3 messages)
Bach's Where Sheep May Safely Graze from Hut (5 messages)
Bach/clav (6 messages)
Bach/clavichord/conclusions (2 messages)
Bass Figuring (again) (4 messages)
Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV (3 messages)
Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV - reviews (3 messages)
blandine rannou (1 message)
Boston MFA - harpsichord decoration (4 messages)
CD (2 messages)
changing strings w/o removing pins (5 messages)
Church bells -- was Scarlatti's Tremulo (2 messages)
Clavichord and harpsichord loudness (1 message)
Clavichord keys & harpsichord tales (1 message)
Clavichord, Waldstein and Musicology (2 messages)
clavichords again (2 messages)
contact info for Joel Katzmann? (2 messages)
crating: about the foam (3 messages)
Cristofori piano CD follow-up (9 messages)
Cristofori piano CD follow-up, so long... (2 messages)
Cult worship of composers (2 messages)
Dulcken (6 messages)
Dulckens revisited (5 messages)
Dumb newby questions (13 messages)
Ebay Watch (3 messages)
Eeeek!!! (6 messages)
Eeeek!!! (Fanfare for the Comma Man) :-) (1 message)
engineering models (2 messages)
Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords (1 message)
Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords (1 message)
Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords (1 message)
FEA analysis, was impedance (1 message)
FEM analysis, was impedance (1 message)
Figured rest (1 message)
Fitting an 8.75 foot (267 cm) Harpsichord into the Car! (3 messages)
Fortepi-latti (3 messages)
Free notation software (2 messages)
french suites versus art of the yaknow (3 messages)
Fretted and unfretted (68 messages)
funny clavichord advertisements (4 messages)
Fw: (2 messages)
Fwd: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French (1 message)
Georg Boehm -- geneology? (1 message)
Georg Boehm -- geneology? Böhm (1 message)
getting the instrument right (5 messages)
Getting the notes right / getting the instrument right (1 message)
Gunnar Johannsen (long) (3 messages)
Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist (2 messages)
Gunner Johannsen (1 message)
Habemus Hartung Nuernberg 1749 on Re: harmonic Tempo, Tempo (1 message)
harmonic Tempo, Tempo (2 messages)
harmonic Tempo, Tempo - addendum (1 message)
harmonic Tempo, Tempo Re: Bass Figuring (again), organ points, tasto solo ... (1 message)
Harpsichord evaluation? (2 messages)
Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice (3 messages)
Harpsichord technique exercises (1 message)
Heresy (6 messages)
historical clavichord for sell (1 message)
HOAX (Was: Virus Warning) (1 message)
how 'difficult' is the clavichord [to play, not to carry] (2 messages)
How many recordings of Messiah? (1 message)
Ignore all virus warnings (1 message)
impedance and engineering questions (5 messages)
Impedance, engineering, F&R, and sodium crystals (1 message)
impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted (13 messages)
In praise of amateurs, and professionals (1 message)
In prasie of amateurs [was Re: Re: One size fits all?] (1 message)
Instrument Photo (2 messages)
Internet music site wants harpsichord music (2 messages)
is it a good tap, bottoms, etc. (5 messages)
is it a good tap? (4 messages)
Josse Boutmy (4 messages)
JSB, WTC, ET (1 message)
JSB/clavichord (3 messages)
JSB/clavichord Equal temperament, choice of temperament (1 message)
KdF - (Werner) Egk mich am (Carl) Orff, Stravinsky Les noces etc (1 message)
Let us be friendly (1 message)
Let's hear it for Louis Couperin (1 message)
Lime-Tails etc (2 messages)
Link to "Five lectures on the acoustics of the piano" (1 message)
Louis Couperin Passacaille in C - question (1 message)
Many thanks for Handelian answers (1 message)
marking strings (2 messages)
more about Louis Couperin's Passacaille in C (2 messages)
Musical chairs in Chinon (1 message)
new Zuckerman site! (1 message)
Notated rallentendo by Rameau (1 message)
Notated rallentendos (1 message)
odd keys and temperament ordinaire (1 message)
One size fits all? (11 messages)
ONLY one harpsichord (11 messages)
ONLY one harpsichord & MOVING THEM (1 message)
organ points, tasto solo and the insertion of chords on a tactic level (1 message)
organological sideshow. was: A Harpsichord Sideboard... (1 message)
our in tune taps (1 message)
parts needed (1 message)
Performance practice question (2 messages)
Piano-store finds... (3 messages)
pinblock oak (5 messages)
Pinblocks and Tuning Pins--thanks (2 messages)
pins (5 messages)
pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice (14 messages)
playing in a new instrument (2 messages)
poll: 1600-1750 keyboard music performance data (1 message)
PROVA (1 message)
put another way (3 messages)
Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: Instrument Photo (1 message)
Réf. : Re: all purpose hpschd (1 message)
Réf. : Re: Instrument Photo (2 messages)
RE : Re: Zuckerman German Double (1 message)
recording fade out revisited (3 messages)
Russell collection CD (3 messages)
S shaped soundboard (4 messages)
Scarlatti Forte e piano (1 message)
Scarlatti's K.132 (1 message)
Scarlatti's Tremulo (23 messages)
Scarlatti's tremulo and clavichord (1 message)
Scarlatti's Tremulo as per Barbara Sachs (3 messages)
Scarlatti's Trills (2 messages)
Seattle Events last weekend and next (1 message)
Serious arguments or abuse? (2 messages)
Sexy harpsichord making (2 messages)
side thread narrative, holistic ,reductioo-blessyou (5 messages)
Smith.Dulcken (4 messages)
Some Shakespeare... (1 message)
Source for limewood for keyboards (2 messages)
Spanish baroque (2 messages)
Still Bach/clav (1 message)
still impedance, some fragments (2 messages)
stored energy (1 message)
Stuttgart reminiscenxex (1 message)
Subject: Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist (4 messages)
SV: Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords (2 messages)
Swedish harpsichords (1 message)
tap tones, was Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted (2 messages)
technique (1 message)
Temper, Temper (14 messages)
Temper, Temper, Unequally temper (1 message)
temperaments and odd keys (7 messages)
Tempo, Tempo Re: Bass Figuring (again) (2 messages)
the end of a name (3 messages)
The sideboard! (1 message)
Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double Fr... (1 message)
Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double Fre... (1 message)
Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French (10 messages)
Tremendous Ebay offerings (was Scarlatti's Tremulo) (3 messages)
try this CD (2 messages)
Tuning and Temperament Workshop (1 message)
tuning pins again (1 message)
tuning pins yet again (1 message)
two attractive "harpsichords" on ebay (1 message)
two things: thud, and resonance (5 messages)
Value of pi = 3.0 exactly (2 messages)
VERLET FROBERGER CD (11 messages)
Virus Warning (4 messages)
Virus warning (repeat) (1 message)
Virus Warning ********Off topic (1 message)
Virus Warning was a hoax (1 message)
Virus Warning/John Cage (4 messages)
voicing aid (12 messages)
we are still tappin (1 message)
what harpsichord1 (2 messages)
where's our discussion going (4 messages)
Wire lubrication? (4 messages)
wolf note and impe...or not (11 messages)
Yes I can hear a clavichord (1 message)
Yes it is a cupboard (1 message)
Zuckerman German Double (4 messages)
Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling (6 messages)
Zuckermann price (3 messages)
[Re] getting the "text" right? (5 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"playing-in" a brand new instrument

"playing-in" a brand new instrument

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 16:42:04 -0400

21 lines

Re: "playing-in" a brand new instrument

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 17:07:20 -0400

28 lines

Re: "playing-in" a brand new instrument

ABielefeldt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 14:19:59 -0700

20 lines

Re: "playing-in" a brand new instrument

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 00:14:13 +0200

19 lines

Re: "playing-in" a brand new instrument

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:22:24 -0500

59 lines

New Thread

A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:20:10 -0400

59 lines

Re: A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 00:50:28 -0500

31 lines

Re: A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:13:24 -0600

48 lines

Re: A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:48:51 -0400

21 lines

Re: A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

randolph white <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:50:40 +0100

25 lines

Re: A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:32:53 -0600

45 lines

Re: A clearer impedance model (MAY BE BORING)

randolph white <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 17:25:39 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

A clearer view on string tails

Re: A clearer view on string tails

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 15:59:02 -0400

26 lines

Re: A clearer view on string tails

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:14:03 -0500

17 lines

Re: A clearer view on string tails

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:33:43 +0100

41 lines

Re: A clearer view on string tails

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:27:13 -0400

26 lines

Re: A clearer view on string tails

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:36:02 -0500

30 lines

Re: A clearer view on string tails

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:40:20 -0600

60 lines

Re: A clearer view on string tails

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:12:10 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

A Handelian question

A Handelian question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:13:09 -0700

22 lines

Re: A Handelian question

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 14:25:45 -0400

20 lines

Re: A Handelian question

Mimi S. Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:47:50 +0100

33 lines

Re: A Handelian question

Mimi S. Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:53:39 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

A Harpsichord Cupboard

A Harpsichord Cupboard

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:42:42 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

A Harpsichord Sideboard

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard

Richard Shagam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 07:51:17 -0800

47 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:11:11 -0500

21 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:50:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:02:41 -0500

16 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 13:19:50 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

A Harpsichord Sideboard....

A Harpsichord Sideboard....

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 00:30:58 EST

40 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Andrew and Diana Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:32:22 +1000

54 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 03:35:42 EST

27 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:49:49 +0200

39 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 01:10:19 -0800

18 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 04:30:58 EST

18 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Andrew and Diana Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 22:12:03 +1000

47 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 07:32:23 -0500

19 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:15:17 -0500

38 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 08:59:11 -0500

28 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:21:20 -0500

59 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:53:24 EST

38 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:57:12 EST

22 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:01:05 EST

24 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:33:55 -0500

15 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:47:38 -0500

35 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 12:16:45 EST

22 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:10:04 -0500

36 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 09:10:57 -0800

32 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:06:12 -0500

63 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 17:11:39 -0500

22 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 14:32:41 -0800

55 lines

New Thread

A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:51:04 +0100

43 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 20:08:37 EST

21 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Andrew and Diana Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 18:57:26 +1000

44 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Andrew and Diana Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 19:24:23 +1000

43 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:09:40 -0500

46 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Andrew and Diana Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:27:31 +1000

72 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 09:18:30 -0500

24 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:18:47 EST

18 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 11:04:23 -0500

83 lines

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 10:34:09 -0600

67 lines

New Thread

A Harpsichord Sideboard....end of the mahogany

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end of the mahogany

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:35:12 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

A Harpsichord Sideboard....end x 2

Re: A Harpsichord Sideboard....end x 2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 21:32:16 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

A QUESTION FOR THE LIST

A QUESTION FOR THE LIST

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 16:01:48 EDT

19 lines

New Thread

all purpoaw hpschd

all purpoaw hpschd

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:39:02 +0200

42 lines

Re: all purpoaw hpschd

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:00:29 -0400

22 lines

Re: all purpoaw hpschd

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:29:02 -0500

61 lines

Re: all purpoaw hpschd

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:57:42 EDT

53 lines

Re: all purpoaw hpschd

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 17:59:43 -0700

121 lines

New Thread

all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 10:14:24 -0700

79 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 12:04:11 -0600

105 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:02:47 -0400

123 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:59:23 -0700

120 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 20:07:10 -0400

19 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 17:20:12 -0700

119 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:48:57 EDT

57 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:50:16 EDT

30 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 10:17:20 -0700

62 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:21:20 -0400

38 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:22:10 -0400

39 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:23:30 EDT

123 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:23:51 EDT

25 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:30:54 -0400

36 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 14:45:39 -0400

17 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:17:38 EDT

34 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:49:23 -0400

42 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:31:36 EDT

31 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:32:34 -0400

20 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:32:54 -0500

15 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 22:08:36 -0400

27 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 00:39:46 -0500

30 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:04:33 -0400

30 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:43:00 +0200

22 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:21:36 -0400

22 lines

Re: All purpose harpsichord? ruminating

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:56:33 -0400

31 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 12:54:17 EDT

16 lines

Re: all purpose harpsichord? ruminating

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:00:36 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

all purpose hpschd

Re: all purpose hpschd

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:03:18 +0200

46 lines

Re: all purpose hpschd

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:51:34 EDT

39 lines

New Thread

and indeed: Virginals

Re: and indeed: Virginals

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 20:09:20 -0400

36 lines

Re: and indeed: Virginals

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:37:33 +0200

29 lines

Re: and indeed: Virginals

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 02:21:11 -0700

45 lines

Re: and indeed: Virginals

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:22:18 +0200

56 lines

Re: and indeed: Virginals

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:28:51 -0400

40 lines

Re: and indeed: Virginals

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:39:54 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Another harpsichord recital in Tours

Another harpsichord recital in Tours

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:11:09 +0200

35 lines

Re: Another harpsichord recital in Tours

Gérard Janot <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 06:18:20 -0400

9 lines

New Thread

Antonio Valente

Antonio Valente

Ron Merner <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 20:19:38 -0700

19 lines

Re: Antonio Valente

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:20:58 -0400

29 lines

Re: Antonio Valente

Ron Merner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:22:50 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Antonio Valente 2

Re: Antonio Valente 2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:04:28 +0100

47 lines

Re: Antonio Valente 2

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:04:35 +0100

25 lines

Re: Antonio Valente 2

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:40:20 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

apaling treatment

apaling treatment

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 13:52:56 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

are you a square head?

are you a square head?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:56:47 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Ars atque scientia

Ars atque scientia

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 00:43:39 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Bach and NOT the clavichord

Bach and NOT the clavichord

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:30:35 +0100

30 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:27:04 -0400

148 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 01:03:06 EDT

43 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 01:58:25 -0400

36 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:05:20 +0200

57 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 07:51:56 -0400

19 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:31:43 -0400

72 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:39:30 -0400

26 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:20:57 -0400

92 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:21:28 -0400

23 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 11:18:45 -0400

17 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 19:24:06 +0200

42 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:58:13 EDT

95 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 15:49:17 +0100

40 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:02:40 -0400

134 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 13:32:22 -0400

34 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 21:19:10 EDT

94 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Johan van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:41:38 +0200

48 lines

Re: Bach and NOT the clavichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 07:46:16 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

Bach and the clavichord ... again and again

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again and again

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:24:53 +0100

66 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again and again

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:14:50 -0400

67 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again and again

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:29:19 -0400

36 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again and again

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:53:04 -0400

25 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again and again

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:34:30 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Bach and the clavichord ... again?

Bach and the clavichord ... again?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:57:39 +0100

57 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again?

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:38:52 +0200

77 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again?

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 17:56:05 -0400

28 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:44:01 -0400

43 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... again?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:43:20 EDT

47 lines

New Thread

Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 23:18:48 +0100

99 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:49:21 +0200

35 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:03:41 -0400

83 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:52:07 -0400

35 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:52:53 -0400

26 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Leonhardt

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:14:59 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Bach and the clavichord ... ask Stuart

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Stuart

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:29:09 +0200

71 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Stuart

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:22:08 -0400

37 lines

Re: Bach and the clavichord ... ask Stuart

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 15:55:50 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

Bach ans sons and clavichord

Bach ans sons and clavichord

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:10:20 +0100

34 lines

Re: Bach ans sons and clavichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:46:43 -0400

25 lines

Re: Bach ans sons and clavichord

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:54:04 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Bach's Where Sheep May Safely Graze from Hut

Bach's Where Sheep May Safely Graze from Hut

Vicky RH <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 02:34:26 +0100

22 lines

Re: Bach's Where Sheep May Safely Graze from Hut

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:10:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: Bach's Where Sheep May Safely Graze from Hut

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:27:59 -0700

18 lines

Re: Bach's Where Sheep May Safely Graze from Hut

Matthias Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:45:26 +0200

62 lines

Re: Bach's Where Sheep May Safely Graze from Hut

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 11:03:37 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

Bach/clav

Bach/clav

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:07:20 -0500

31 lines

Re: Bach/clav

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:10:59 +0200

56 lines

Bach/clav

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:44:31 -0500

33 lines

Re: Bach/clav

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:56:31 -0500

37 lines

Re: Bach/clav

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 09:41:32 -0500

30 lines

Re: Bach/clav

Johan van Veen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:33:39 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

Bach/clavichord/conclusions

Bach/clavichord/conclusions

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 17:48:30 +0100

41 lines

Re: Bach/clavichord/conclusions

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 15:04:39 -0400

62 lines

New Thread

Bass Figuring (again)

Bass Figuring (again)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:06:36 -0400

53 lines

Re: Bass Figuring (again)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:58:55 -0400

51 lines

Re: Bass Figuring (again)

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 02:25:09 +0100

84 lines

Re: Bass Figuring (again)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:26:36 -0400

79 lines

New Thread

Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV

Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV

Karsten Unverricht <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 11:18:57 +0200

20 lines

Re: Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 16:25:24 -0400

19 lines

Re: Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:47:46 +0200

28 lines

New Thread

Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV - reviews

Re: Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV - reviews

Karsten Unverricht <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:31:32 +0200

30 lines

Re: Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV - reviews

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:20:48 -0400

49 lines

Re: Belder's Scarlatti - Vol. IV - reviews

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:37:59 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

blandine rannou

blandine rannou

whady florez <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 17:35:45 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Boston MFA - harpsichord decoration

Boston MFA - harpsichord decoration

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 01:11:14 -0400

26 lines

Re: Boston MFA - harpsichord decoration

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 01:26:51 -0400

28 lines

Re: Boston MFA - harpsichord decoration

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 08:14:06 -0400

27 lines

Re: Boston MFA - harpsichord decoration

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:49:35 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

CD

CD

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:37:06 +0100

13 lines

Re: CD

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 04:35:18 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

changing strings w/o removing pins

changing strings w/o removing pins

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:21:34 +0200

25 lines

Re: changing strings w/o removing pins

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:06:57 -0400

35 lines

Re: changing strings w/o removing pins

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:46:57 +0200

55 lines

Re: changing strings w/o removing pins

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:48:05 -0400

18 lines

Re: changing strings w/o removing pins

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:47:16 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Church bells -- was Scarlatti's Tremulo

Church bells -- was Scarlatti's Tremulo

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:28:02 -0400

42 lines

Re: Church bells -- was Scarlatti's Tremulo

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 14:40:34 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Clavichord and harpsichord loudness

Clavichord and harpsichord loudness

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:24:17 +0100

64 lines

New Thread

Clavichord keys & harpsichord tales

Clavichord keys & harpsichord tales

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 07:50:48 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

Clavichord, Waldstein and Musicology

Clavichord, Waldstein and Musicology

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 21:41:33 +0100

44 lines

Re: Clavichord, Waldstein and Musicology

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 18:12:21 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

clavichords again

clavichords again

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:13:58 -0400

17 lines

Re: clavichords again

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:59:26 EDT

39 lines

New Thread

contact info for Joel Katzmann?

contact info for Joel Katzmann?

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:30:22 -0800

23 lines

Re: contact info for Joel Katzmann?

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:14:22 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

crating: about the foam

crating: about the foam

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 13:47:53 -0400

12 lines

Re: crating: about the foam

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:54:45 -0400

36 lines

Re: crating: about the foam

Michael S. Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 20:12:28 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 03:04:30 -0400

29 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 10:19:34 -0500

19 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 15:56:58 -0400

43 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 13:31:54 -0700

85 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:32:59 -0400

71 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 07:31:17 -0400

68 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:17:08 +0200

17 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 19:22:12 +0200

23 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 04:14:45 -0400

115 lines

New Thread

Cristofori piano CD follow-up, so long...

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up, so long...

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:33:58 -0400

41 lines

Re: Cristofori piano CD follow-up, so long...

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:31:03 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Cult worship of composers

Cult worship of composers

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 17:51:20 EDT

34 lines

Re: Cult worship of composers

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 19:43:54 -0400

50 lines

New Thread

Dulcken

Dulcken

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:42:37 -0700

21 lines

Re: Dulcken

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:11:56 -0600

42 lines

Re: Dulcken

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 15:34:00 -0400

60 lines

Re: Dulcken

worldschmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:44:47 +0100

84 lines

Re: Dulcken

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 05:32:56 -0700

164 lines

Re: Dulcken

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:07:24 -0500

57 lines

New Thread

Dulckens revisited

Dulckens revisited

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 07:40:01 -0700

44 lines

Re: Dulckens revisited

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:12:46 -0400

39 lines

Re: Dulckens revisited

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:52:50 -0400

18 lines

Re: Dulckens revisited

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:23:22 -0500

28 lines

Re: Dulckens revisited

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 18:42:06 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

Dumb newby questions

Dumb newby questions

John Wilson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 01:01:36 -0400

65 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 23:18:20 -0700

30 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 06:52:28 -0700

130 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:38:29 -0500

33 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 18:29:09 +0100

75 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:06:35 -0400

106 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:33:27 -0600

15 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:36:34 -0600

12 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:40:18 -0600

15 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 21:23:16 -0700

76 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 23:44:22 -0500

26 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 04:25:27 -0700

23 lines

Re: Dumb newby questions

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 14:28:25 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Ebay Watch

Ebay Watch

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:08:03 -0400

23 lines

Re: Ebay Watch

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:43:24 EDT

26 lines

Re: Ebay Watch

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 01:38:40 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

Eeeek!!!

Eeeek!!!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:06:58 -0400

17 lines

Re: Eeeek!!!

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:14:22 -0700

26 lines

Re: Eeeek!!!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:19:38 -0400

31 lines

Re: Eeeek!!!

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:37:12 -0700

42 lines

Re: Eeeek!!!

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:42:02 -0700

40 lines

Re: Eeeek!!!

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 06:48:56 +0200

39 lines

New Thread

Eeeek!!! (Fanfare for the Comma Man) :-)

Re: Eeeek!!! (Fanfare for the Comma Man) :-)

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:45:46 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

engineering models

Re: engineering models

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 15:57:05 -0600

62 lines

Re: engineering models

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 00:26:42 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

Re: Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:46:29 -0600

15 lines

New Thread

Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

Re: Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:47:10 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:03:59 -0400

63 lines

New Thread

FEA analysis, was impedance

FEA analysis, was impedance

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:40:30 -0600

50 lines

New Thread

FEM analysis, was impedance

FEM analysis, was impedance

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:58:28 -0600

38 lines

New Thread

Figured rest

Re: Figured rest

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:34:56 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

Fitting an 8.75 foot (267 cm) Harpsichord into the Car!

Fitting an 8.75 foot (267 cm) Harpsichord into the Car!

Kemer Thomson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:12:56 -0700

35 lines

Re: Fitting an 8.75 foot (267 cm) Harpsichord into the Car!

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:33:52 -0700

24 lines

Re: Fitting an 8.75 foot (267 cm) Harpsichord into the Car!

Kemer Thomson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:52:13 -0700

43 lines

New Thread

Fortepi-latti

Re: Fortepi-latti

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:19:56 -0400

29 lines

Re: Fortepi-latti

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:45:05 +0100

40 lines

Re: Fortepi-latti

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 18:31:38 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Free notation software

Free notation software

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 10:14:42 -0400

16 lines

Re: Free notation software

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:49:05 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

french suites versus art of the yaknow

Re: french suites versus art of the yaknow

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 10:00:06 -0400

15 lines

Re: french suites versus art of the yaknow

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 17:54:20 +0200

46 lines

Re: french suites versus art of the yaknow

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:47:16 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Fretted and unfretted

Fretted and unfretted

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:51:46 +0100

22 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:11:49 -0700

47 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:29:22 -0400

28 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 17:39:02 -0400

30 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:52:13 -0600

56 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:07:47 +0100

37 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:40:10 -0400

57 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:38:28 -0700

53 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 15:46:39 -0700

14 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:17:27 -0400

15 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 19:41:17 -0600

23 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:55:51 -0700

35 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:58:11 -0700

36 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:27:36 -0400

23 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:40:24 -0400

32 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:15:04 -0600

54 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:16:58 -0600

45 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:33:31 +0200

38 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:42:30 +0200

24 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 06:46:52 +0200

24 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:15:05 +0200

23 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 10:00:34 +0200

50 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:15:31 -0400

38 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:51:05 -0600

37 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:04:18 -0600

22 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:51:15 -0700

92 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Nathan I Smutz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 12:44:17 -0700

27 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 16:01:57 -0400

34 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:10:24 -0600

102 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 14:23:38 -0600

52 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:20:58 -0400

27 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:41:58 -0700

39 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:13:07 -0500

23 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:00:26 -0400

23 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:21:04 -0500

30 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 18:50:50 -0700

46 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 21:57:06 -0400

33 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 23:46:36 -0500

23 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:49:46 +0100

78 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 05:46:19 -0400

59 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 12:05:55 +0100

98 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 07:21:16 -0400

19 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 08:33:55 -0400

93 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 09:24:13 -0400

73 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:16:31 -0600

29 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 13:26:30 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:50:49 -0600

88 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 20:13:28 +0200

45 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:00:25 -0400

19 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:51:00 -0600

37 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:59:37 -0600

67 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:11:55 -0400

40 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 16:50:28 -0700

91 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:50:05 -0600

21 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:25:08 +0200

92 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 03:33:16 -0700

41 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:22:05 -0400

74 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

randolph white <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:06:29 +0100

36 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:18:32 -0600

103 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:19:50 +0200

26 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:31:56 -0400

22 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:50:30 -0600

78 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:53:16 -0600

14 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:57:48 -0700

63 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:06:17 -0600

35 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:16:26 -0600

32 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:46:23 -0400

21 lines

Re: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:54:06 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

funny clavichord advertisements

funny clavichord advertisements

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:13:23 -0400

39 lines

Re: funny clavichord advertisements

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:07:26 EDT

19 lines

Re: funny clavichord advertisements

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:44:21 EDT

22 lines

Re: funny clavichord advertisements

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 00:46:40 EDT

17 lines

New Thread

Fw:

Fw:

marco delellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:52:23 -0700

23 lines

Fw:

marco delellis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 08:19:33 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Fwd: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:33:00 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Georg Boehm -- geneology?

Georg Boehm -- geneology?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 18:32:18 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

Georg Boehm -- geneology? Böhm

Georg Boehm -- geneology? Böhm

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 08:30:51 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

getting the instrument right

Re: getting the instrument right

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 02:38:19 EDT

118 lines

Re: getting the instrument right

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:38:36 -0400

76 lines

Re: getting the instrument right

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:36:03 -0500

119 lines

Re: getting the instrument right

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:42:45 EDT

99 lines

Re: getting the instrument right

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:45:52 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Getting the notes right / getting the instrument right

Getting the notes right / getting the instrument right

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:37:32 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

Gunnar Johannsen (long)

Gunnar Johannsen (long)

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 17:15:06 -0500

84 lines

Re: Gunnar Johannsen (long)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 18:35:26 -0500

36 lines

Re: Gunnar Johannsen (long)

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 20:58:46 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 20:35:57 -0400

14 lines

Re: Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:32:48 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Gunner Johannsen

Gunner Johannsen

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:55:46 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

Habemus Hartung Nuernberg 1749 on Re: harmonic Tempo, Tempo

Habemus Hartung Nuernberg 1749 on Re: harmonic Tempo, Tempo

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 19:40:46 +0200

121 lines

New Thread

harmonic Tempo, Tempo

Re: harmonic Tempo, Tempo

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:48:01 -0400

63 lines

Re: harmonic Tempo, Tempo

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 17:36:31 +0200

66 lines

New Thread

harmonic Tempo, Tempo - addendum

Re: harmonic Tempo, Tempo - addendum

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 18:03:59 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

harmonic Tempo, Tempo Re: Bass Figuring (again), organ points, tasto solo ...

Re: harmonic Tempo, Tempo Re: Bass Figuring (again), organ points, tasto solo ...

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:00:44 +0200

93 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord evaluation?

Harpsichord evaluation?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 12:13:38 -0500

45 lines

Re: Harpsichord evaluation?

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 15:54:32 EDT

12 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Richard Shagam <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 17:09:38 -0800

46 lines

Re: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 21:16:44 -0800

18 lines

Re: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:30:01 -0400

60 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord technique exercises

Harpsichord technique exercises

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:40:13 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

Heresy

Heresy

Carlos Nogus <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 02:16:36 -0400

29 lines

Re: Heresy

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 03:38:27 -0400

31 lines

Re: Heresy

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:07:23 -0500

27 lines

Re: Heresy

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 20:51:21 EDT

69 lines

Re: Heresy

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 18:06:28 -0700

36 lines

Re: Heresy

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 07:50:20 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

historical clavichord for sell

historical clavichord for sell

Thomas Glueck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 13:08:07 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

HOAX (Was: Virus Warning)

HOAX (Was: Virus Warning)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:22:38 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

how 'difficult' is the clavichord [to play, not to carry]

how 'difficult' is the clavichord [to play, not to carry]

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:25:01 -0400

36 lines

Re: how 'difficult' is the clavichord [to play, not to carry]

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 19:59:31 EDT

19 lines

New Thread

How many recordings of Messiah?

How many recordings of Messiah?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 12:08:00 -0700

38 lines

New Thread

Ignore all virus warnings

Ignore all virus warnings

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 09:49:20 -0400

65 lines

New Thread

impedance and engineering questions

Re: impedance and engineering questions

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:00:56 +0200

58 lines

Re: impedance and engineering questions

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:09:06 -0400

112 lines

Re: impedance and engineering questions

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 09:21:24 -0600

66 lines

Re: impedance and engineering questions

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 10:20:01 -0600

42 lines

Re: impedance and engineering questions

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:45:11 -0400

42 lines

New Thread

Impedance, engineering, F&R, and sodium crystals

Impedance, engineering, F&R, and sodium crystals

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 03:10:37 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 17:28:13 -0400

74 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 20:21:00 -0600

109 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 07:16:40 +0200

62 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

randolph white <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 10:17:57 +0100

29 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:36:09 -0600

57 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 11:45:34 -0600

15 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 14:16:21 -0400

40 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 18:03:25 -0400

81 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:12:44 -0400

34 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:17:22 -0400

27 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 13:00:04 +0100

60 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 23:36:56 -0500

33 lines

Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 13:13:06 -0600

77 lines

New Thread

In praise of amateurs, and professionals

Re: In praise of amateurs, and professionals

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 06:50:47 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

In prasie of amateurs [was Re: Re: One size fits all?]

In prasie of amateurs [was Re: Re: One size fits all?]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:45:04 +0200

88 lines

New Thread

Instrument Photo

Re: Instrument Photo

Timothy S. Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 10:48:06 -0500

28 lines

Re: Instrument Photo

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 19:39:00 +0200

36 lines

New Thread

Internet music site wants harpsichord music

Internet music site wants harpsichord music

John Buckman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 22:00:01 -0800

37 lines

Re: Internet music site wants harpsichord music

bellmartin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 15:10:28 -0500

77 lines

New Thread

is it a good tap, bottoms, etc.

Re: is it a good tap, bottoms, etc.

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:41:17 -0400

33 lines

Re: is it a good tap, bottoms, etc.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:56:12 -0700

43 lines

Re: is it a good tap, bottoms, etc.

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 00:01:44 +0200

37 lines

Re: is it a good tap, bottoms, etc.

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Apr 2003 07:51:23 -0700

31 lines

Re: is it a good tap, bottoms, etc.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 01:06:29 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

is it a good tap?

is it a good tap?

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 16:30:50 +0100

39 lines

Re: is it a good tap?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 08:51:40 -0700

74 lines

Re: is it a good tap?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 11:58:25 -0400

28 lines

Re: is it a good tap?

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:41:12 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

Josse Boutmy

Josse Boutmy

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 19:25:25 +0200

27 lines

Re: Josse Boutmy

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 23:18:51 +0200

49 lines

Josse Boutmy

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:43:58 +0200

56 lines

Re: Josse Boutmy

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 14:48:30 +0200

34 lines

New Thread

JSB, WTC, ET

JSB, WTC, ET

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 18:12:40 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

JSB/clavichord

Re: JSB/clavichord

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:08:55 -0500

28 lines

Re: JSB/clavichord

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:03:09 -0400

33 lines

Re: JSB/clavichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:21:32 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

JSB/clavichord Equal temperament, choice of temperament

Re: JSB/clavichord Equal temperament, choice of temperament

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 16:50:12 +0200

139 lines

New Thread

KdF - (Werner) Egk mich am (Carl) Orff, Stravinsky Les noces etc

KdF - (Werner) Egk mich am (Carl) Orff, Stravinsky Les noces etc

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 14:18:29 +0200

71 lines

New Thread

Let us be friendly

Let us be friendly

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 01:35:37 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Let's hear it for Louis Couperin

Let's hear it for Louis Couperin

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:06:44 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

Lime-Tails etc

Lime-Tails etc

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 08:31:15 +0100

44 lines

Re: Lime-Tails etc

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:53:37 +0200

70 lines

New Thread

Link to "Five lectures on the acoustics of the piano"

Link to "Five lectures on the acoustics of the piano"

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:56:36 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Louis Couperin Passacaille in C - question

Louis Couperin Passacaille in C - question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:30:37 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Many thanks for Handelian answers

Many thanks for Handelian answers

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 13:33:12 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

marking strings

marking strings

Adam Grimes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 21:49:57 -0400

22 lines

Re: marking strings

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 21:03:56 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

more about Louis Couperin's Passacaille in C

more about Louis Couperin's Passacaille in C

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:50:35 -0400

67 lines

Re: more about Louis Couperin's Passacaille in C

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:10:56 -0400

75 lines

New Thread

Musical chairs in Chinon

Musical chairs in Chinon

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 17:01:58 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

new Zuckerman site!

new Zuckerman site!

Jacques Hardin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:41:43 -0700

17 lines

New Thread

Notated rallentendo by Rameau

Notated rallentendo by Rameau

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 22:15:32 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Notated rallentendos

Notated rallentendos

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 21:55:01 +0200

27 lines

New Thread

odd keys and temperament ordinaire

Re: odd keys and temperament ordinaire

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:01:33 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

One size fits all?

One size fits all?

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 14:03:08 -0700

37 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:16:26 -0700

70 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 18:57:53 -0400

56 lines

Re: One size fits all?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 19:53:08 -0400

28 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 21:25:02 -0400

40 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 20:07:23 -0700

47 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:20:51 -0400

58 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 21:04:24 -0700

41 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 07:03:53 -0400

25 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 13:47:08 +0100

50 lines

Re: One size fits all?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 15:15:04 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

ONLY one harpsichord

ONLY one harpsichord

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 21:27:20 -0400

19 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 22:08:05 -0400

48 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:07:39 EDT

18 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:03:26 -0400

21 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:43:46 -0400

21 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 13:24:59 EDT

80 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 21:29:54 +0200

23 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 16:14:45 -0400

34 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 15:14:43 -0500

29 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:51:02 +0200

44 lines

Re: ONLY one harpsichord

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 22:34:56 EDT

59 lines

New Thread

ONLY one harpsichord & MOVING THEM

Re: ONLY one harpsichord & MOVING THEM

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:12:19 -0700

137 lines

New Thread

organ points, tasto solo and the insertion of chords on a tactic level

organ points, tasto solo and the insertion of chords on a tactic level

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:31:17 -0400

61 lines

New Thread

organological sideshow. was: A Harpsichord Sideboard...

organological sideshow. was: A Harpsichord Sideboard...

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 08:51:52 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

our in tune taps

our in tune taps

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 19:48:59 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

parts needed

Re: parts needed

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 04:19:21 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

Performance practice question

Performance practice question

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:05:07 -0400

36 lines

Re: Performance practice question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:44:34 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Piano-store finds...

Piano-store finds...

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 18:17:06 EDT

34 lines

Re: Piano-store finds...

Nicholas Good <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 20:00:31 -0500

52 lines

Re: Piano-store finds...

The Halls <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:35:35 -0600

51 lines

New Thread

pinblock oak

pinblock oak

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 08:40:33 -0700

22 lines

Re: pinblock oak

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:36:26 EDT

19 lines

Re: pinblock oak

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:48:51 -0600

32 lines

Re: pinblock oak

Lance Montfort Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 10:45:27 -0700

29 lines

Re: pinblock oak

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:37:00 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Pinblocks and Tuning Pins--thanks

Pinblocks and Tuning Pins--thanks

Richard Shagam <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:18:44 -0700

48 lines

Re: Pinblocks and Tuning Pins--thanks

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:40:24 -0700

76 lines

New Thread

pins

Re: pins

Mimi S. Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 19:59:43 +0100

58 lines

Re: pins

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 12:20:18 -0700

35 lines

Re: pins

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:28:42 -0400

25 lines

Re: pins

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:51:47 -0400

55 lines

Re: pins

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:09:28 -0400

46 lines

New Thread

pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 07:58:58 -0400

28 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 11:13:00 -0700

26 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 16:54:04 -0400

30 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 17:22:40 -0400

51 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 05:26:02 -0400

38 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 18:11:23 -0400

29 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:00:33 -0400

49 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:47:03 -0400

67 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 19:56:22 -0500

25 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:59:11 -0600

15 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Douglas Amrine <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 02:04:32 -0400

20 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 08:54:59 -0400

33 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:09:31 -0400

34 lines

Re: pins, was: Harpsichord Pinblock--need advice

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:58:53 -0400

26 lines

New Thread

playing in a new instrument

playing in a new instrument

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 08:45:58 +0100

23 lines

Re: playing in a new instrument

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 12:26:08 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

poll: 1600-1750 keyboard music performance data

poll: 1600-1750 keyboard music performance data

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 16:23:49 +0200

122 lines

New Thread

PROVA

PROVA

marco delellis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 08:57:42 -0700

9 lines

New Thread

put another way

put another way

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 17:03:23 -0700

18 lines

Re: put another way

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 00:18:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: put another way

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 23:54:50 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: Instrument Photo

Réf. : Re: Réf. : Re: Instrument Photo

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 18:20:53 +0200

10 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Re: all purpose hpschd

Réf. : Re: all purpose hpschd

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 09:26:41 +0200

18 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Re: Instrument Photo

Réf. : Re: Instrument Photo

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 16:21:23 +0200

17 lines

Re: Réf. : Re: Instrument Photo

Altamiro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 11:38:57 -0300

10 lines

New Thread

RE : Re: Zuckerman German Double

RE : Re: Zuckerman German Double

GERARD JANOT <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 09:21:18 +0200

49 lines

New Thread

recording fade out revisited

recording fade out revisited

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:43:54 -0400

33 lines

Re: recording fade out revisited

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:27:16 -0400

56 lines

Re: recording fade out revisited

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 17:06:23 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Russell collection CD

Russell collection CD

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 21:58:16 -0400

19 lines

Re: Russell collection CD

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 08:01:50 -0400

29 lines

Re: Russell collection CD

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:54:25 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

S shaped soundboard

S shaped soundboard

Phillip Ford <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 16:41:59 -0700

29 lines

Re: S shaped soundboard

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:19:13 -0500

23 lines

Re: S shaped soundboard

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:51:40 +0200

41 lines

Re: S shaped soundboard

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:55:17 -0700

77 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti Forte e piano

Scarlatti Forte e piano

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 18:43:09 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti's K.132

Re: Scarlatti's K.132

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:03:05 EDT

21 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti's Tremulo

Scarlatti's Tremulo

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:12:26 -0400

16 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 11:24:34 +0200

42 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:23:47 -0400

25 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:38:46 +0100

37 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 14:56:28 EDT

34 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 14:22:58 -0500

25 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 21:35:01 +0200

69 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:43:20 -0400

38 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:16:00 -0400

35 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 23:26:50 +0200

24 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Janet E. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 18:32:07 -0400

55 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:46:28 EDT

50 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:49:59 EDT

77 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:51:01 -0400

33 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:02:36 -0400

23 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 12:08:51 EDT

38 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 15:11:34 -0500

38 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 08:21:36 -0400

20 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 09:43:56 -0500

40 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:25:56 -0400

47 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 14:51:36 -0400

65 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 00:13:07 -0500

38 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:28:31 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti's tremulo and clavichord

Scarlatti's tremulo and clavichord

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 23:06:52 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti's Tremulo as per Barbara Sachs

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo as per Barbara Sachs

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 22:55:06 +0100

47 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo as per Barbara Sachs

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:52:43 EDT

29 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Tremulo as per Barbara Sachs

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 22:32:49 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Scarlatti's Trills

Scarlatti's Trills

Michael Dunn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 00:27:48 -0400

14 lines

Re: Scarlatti's Trills

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:50:33 +0100

73 lines

New Thread

Seattle Events last weekend and next

Seattle Events last weekend and next

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 10:56:05 -0700

84 lines

New Thread

Serious arguments or abuse?

Serious arguments or abuse?

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 18:03:58 +0100

54 lines

Re: Serious arguments or abuse?

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 23:47:46 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Sexy harpsichord making

Sexy harpsichord making

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:07:50 -0400

21 lines

Re: Sexy harpsichord making

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:28:30 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

side thread narrative, holistic ,reductioo-blessyou

Re: side thread narrative, holistic ,reductioo-blessyou

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 14:55:32 -0400

53 lines

Re: side thread narrative, holistic ,reductioo-blessyou

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 16:07:34 -0600

62 lines

Re: side thread narrative, holistic ,reductioo-blessyou

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 18:37:40 -0400

20 lines

Re: side thread narrative, holistic ,reductioo-blessyou

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 21:44:21 -0600

27 lines

Re: side thread narrative, holistic ,reductioo-blessyou

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:50:02 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Smith.Dulcken

Smith.Dulcken

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 14:57:32 +0200

18 lines

Re: Smith.Dulcken

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:43:27 -0400

28 lines

Re: Smith.Dulcken

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:49:02 -0400

22 lines

Re: Smith.Dulcken

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 23:37:54 +0200

16 lines

New Thread

Some Shakespeare...

Some Shakespeare...

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:15:12 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Source for limewood for keyboards

Source for limewood for keyboards

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 13:12:51 -0500

15 lines

Re: Source for limewood for keyboards

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 17:50:27 -0400

31 lines

New Thread

Spanish baroque

Spanish baroque

heimann kerry b <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 12:52:45 -0500

25 lines

Re: Spanish baroque

Mimi S. Waitzman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 22:09:14 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

Still Bach/clav

Still Bach/clav

David C. Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 16:24:41 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

still impedance, some fragments

Re: still impedance, some fragments

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:45:01 -0400

72 lines

Re: still impedance, some fragments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 12:02:32 -0600

57 lines

New Thread

stored energy

Re: stored energy

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 13:14:27 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

Stuttgart reminiscenxex

Re: Stuttgart reminiscenxex

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 02:34:01 -0400

33 lines

New Thread

Subject: Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Re: Subject: Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Richard Shagam <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 21:46:06 -0700

56 lines

Re: Subject: Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 09:51:39 -0500

20 lines

Re: Subject: Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Richard Shagam <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 08:18:02 -0700

78 lines

Re: Subject: Gunnar Johansen - Harpsichordist

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 13:17:43 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

SV: Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

SV: Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

ANDREAS KILSTRÖM <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Mar 2003 01:28:10 +0100

90 lines

SV: Eva Helenius-Öberg on Swedish clavichords

Erik Kristiansen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 09:11:14 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

Swedish harpsichords

Swedish harpsichords

ANDREAS KILSTRÖM <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Mar 2003 03:45:42 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

tap tones, was Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

tap tones, was Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 09:22:20 -0400

21 lines

Re: tap tones, was Re: impedance, was: Fretted and unfretted

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Apr 2003 10:24:59 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

technique

technique

whady florez <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 22:11:12 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Temper, Temper

Re: Temper, Temper

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:03:25 -0600

15 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:41:43 -0400

20 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

whady florez <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:15:15 -0500

49 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 17:50:51 -0600

30 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 18:16:44 -0600

33 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 20:17:00 -0400

24 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 20:38:44 -0500

40 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 20:44:05 -0500

26 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 22:42:49 -0400

20 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:17:51 -0400

24 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:41:03 EDT

48 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 11:08:00 -0600

24 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 13:29:58 EDT

57 lines

Re: Temper, Temper

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 20:49:04 -0600

69 lines

New Thread

Temper, Temper, Unequally temper

Re: Temper, Temper, Unequally temper

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 00:20:37 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

temperaments and odd keys

temperaments and odd keys

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 23:32:55 -0400

57 lines

Re: temperaments and odd keys

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 02:17:09 -0400

34 lines

Re: temperaments and odd keys

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 11:59:16 -0400

32 lines

Re: temperaments and odd keys

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:56:45 -0500

27 lines

Re: temperaments and odd keys

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:11:50 -0400

54 lines

Re: Temperaments and odd keys

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:01:54 -0400

23 lines

Re: Temperaments and odd keys

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Apr 2003 00:46:01 -0400

34 lines

New Thread

Tempo, Tempo Re: Bass Figuring (again)

Tempo, Tempo Re: Bass Figuring (again)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 12:33:37 +0200

182 lines

Re: Tempo, Tempo Re: Bass Figuring (again)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 09:06:46 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

the end of a name

the end of a name

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 15:28:46 +0100

19 lines

Re: the end of a name

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 13:42:57 -0400

54 lines

Re: the end of a name

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Apr 2003 11:19:33 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

The sideboard!

The sideboard!

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 14:42:50 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double Fr...

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double Fr...

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 14:47:09 EDT

82 lines

New Thread

Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double Fre...

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double Fre...

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 23:46:43 EDT

23 lines

New Thread

Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 16:03:51 -0700

152 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:29:59 -0400

35 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:47:33 -0400

52 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 19:38:04 -0500

16 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 21:44:57 -0400

33 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 07:27:27 +0200

54 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:24:56 -0400

36 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 15:55:34 -0500

52 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 16:51:18 -0500

47 lines

Re: Things you'll miss if you insist playing everything on the big double French

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 19:09:49 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Tremendous Ebay offerings (was Scarlatti's Tremulo)

Tremendous Ebay offerings (was Scarlatti's Tremulo)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 12:49:52 -0400

71 lines

Re: Tremendous Ebay offerings (was Scarlatti's Tremulo)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Apr 2003 13:36:16 -0400

17 lines

Re: Tremendous Ebay offerings (was Scarlatti's Tremulo)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:04:09 EDT

21 lines

New Thread

try this CD

try this CD

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 14:35:47 +0100

16 lines

Re: try this CD

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:51:32 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Tuning and Temperament Workshop

Tuning and Temperament Workshop

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 13:08:21 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

tuning pins again

tuning pins again

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Apr 2003 07:51:29 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

tuning pins yet again

tuning pins yet again

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 11:30:27 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

two attractive "harpsichords" on ebay

two attractive "harpsichords" on ebay

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 22:59:24 +0200

43 lines

New Thread

two things: thud, and resonance

two things: thud, and resonance

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:00:15 -0400

41 lines

Re: two things: thud, and resonance

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 20:48:33 -0400

28 lines

Re: two things: thud, and resonance

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 00:04:10 -0500

26 lines

Re: two things: thud, and resonance

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:06:56 -0600

78 lines

Re: two things: thud, and resonance

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 14:08:56 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

Value of pi = 3.0 exactly

Value of pi = 3.0 exactly

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 00:31:39 -0800

25 lines

Re: Value of pi = 3.0 exactly

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Apr 2003 01:55:13 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

VERLET FROBERGER CD

VERLET FROBERGER CD

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:24:53 -0400

14 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:47:32 -0500

33 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:21:17 -0700

30 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Apr 2003 20:16:11 -0700

57 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:30:48 +0200

18 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:56:12 +0200

35 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 09:17:19 -0400

46 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:18:08 -0400

24 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:17:02 -0400

24 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 19:49:53 -0500

33 lines

Re: VERLET FROBERGER CD

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 21:06:27 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Virus Warning

Virus Warning

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:09:20 +0930

81 lines

Re: Virus Warning

Dan & Sandy Steadman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Apr 2003 22:20:34 -0400

107 lines

Re: Virus Warning

nick gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:24:12 +0100

27 lines

Re: Virus Warning

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 10:42:30 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Virus warning (repeat)

Virus warning (repeat)

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:19:47 +0930

112 lines

New Thread

Virus Warning ********Off topic

Re: Virus Warning ********Off topic

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 11:43:31 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Virus Warning was a hoax

Virus Warning was a hoax

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Apr 2003 00:03:48 +0930

47 lines

New Thread

Virus Warning/John Cage

Re: Virus Warning/John Cage

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:15:57 -0400

21 lines

Re: Virus Warning/John Cage

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 14:24:20 -0400

18 lines

Re: Virus Warning/John Cage

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:16:10 EDT

19 lines

Re: Virus Warning/John Cage

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Apr 2003 16:17:48 -0400

22 lines

New Thread

voicing aid

voicing aid

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 16:35:58 -0400

19 lines

Re: voicing aid

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 17:51:45 -0400

29 lines

Re: voicing aid

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 14:58:26 -0700

25 lines

Re: voicing aid

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:01:35 -0700

33 lines

Re: voicing aid

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:01:03 EDT

15 lines

Re: voicing aid

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 19:35:56 -0400

19 lines

Re: voicing aid

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 08:35:35 -0400

33 lines

Re: voicing aid

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 09:29:22 -0700

49 lines

Re: voicing aid

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Apr 2003 10:45:53 -0700

13 lines

Re: voicing aid

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 20:35:42 -0500

15 lines

Re: voicing aid

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Apr 2003 07:48:06 -0400

22 lines

Re: voicing aid

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Apr 2003 13:25:33 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

we are still tappin

we are still tappin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Apr 2003 08:09:23 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

what harpsichord1

what harpsichord1

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 07:54:28 +0100

15 lines

Re: what harpsichord1

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Apr 2003 11:46:20 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

where's our discussion going

where's our discussion going

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:29:19 +0100

31 lines

Re: where's our discussion going

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 14:02:53 +0200

47 lines

Re: where's our discussion going

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:02:08 -0400

31 lines

Re: where's our discussion going

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 11:07:37 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Wire lubrication?

Wire lubrication?

Nathan I Smutz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Apr 2003 15:29:10 -0700

24 lines

Re: Wire lubrication?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 04:21:31 -0400

26 lines

Re: Wire lubrication?

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 09:32:20 -0500

22 lines

Re: Wire lubrication?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 19:18:22 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

wolf note and impe...or not

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Apr 2003 11:25:31 -0400

34 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 10:26:12 +0100

55 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:42:09 -0600

28 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 08:48:02 -0700

50 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 12:31:50 -0400

25 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 11:58:47 -0500

31 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Apr 2003 15:44:31 -0600

58 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:16:31 +0100

43 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Apr 2003 13:42:46 +0100

47 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:12:16 +0100

47 lines

Re: wolf note and impe...or not

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Apr 2003 10:19:56 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

Yes I can hear a clavichord

Yes I can hear a clavichord

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Apr 2003 21:50:16 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

Yes it is a cupboard

Yes it is a cupboard

Claudio Di Veroli <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 01:44:54 +0100

51 lines

New Thread

Zuckerman German Double

Zuckerman German Double

Bruce Behnke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 22:18:23 -0800

16 lines

Re: Zuckerman German Double

Jacques Hardin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 23:02:57 -0800

29 lines

Re: Zuckerman German Double

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Apr 2003 07:17:46 -0800

41 lines

Re: Zuckerman German Double

Mo von Hoerr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Apr 2003 16:18:20 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling

Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling

Robert Lang <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 10:51:32 -0400

12 lines

Re: Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 08:55:16 -0700

34 lines

Re: Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 09:08:05 -0700

36 lines

Re: Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 12:22:15 -0400

26 lines

Re: Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:58:15 -0600

12 lines

Re: Zuckerman ZBOX Scaling

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Apr 2003 23:10:12 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

Zuckermann price

Zuckermann price

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Apr 2003 15:40:57 +1000

34 lines

Re: Zuckermann price

Jacques Hardin <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Apr 2003 17:22:42 -0800

27 lines

Zuckermann price

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Apr 2003 15:09:03 +1000

36 lines

New Thread

[Re] getting the "text" right?

[Re] getting the "text" right?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 10:46:51 -0400

63 lines

Re: [Re] getting the "text" right?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 08:22:33 -0700

58 lines

Re: [Re] getting the "text" right?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 11:27:57 -0400

42 lines

Re: [Re] getting the "text" right?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:01:40 -0400

46 lines

Re: [Re] getting the "text" right?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 30 Apr 2003 12:40:32 -0400

31 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

November 2017
October 2017
September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu