LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2003


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricades misterieuses) (4 messages)
"1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricadesmisterieuses) (1 message)
"Mozart and the Keyboard Culture of His Time." (2 messages)
"Reflections" for harpsichord (1 message)
***Re: The Role of the Nazis -- implicit warning, political content (1 message)
16e hchds with 8 4 (1 message)
a 17th century Italian "ordinary" temperament (1 message)
Address for Bob Heath (2 messages)
archives access? (1 message)
ARGH! (1 message)
Awfully quiet (4 messages)
Awfully quiet / ice (1 message)
Awfully quiet and tuning/thick strings (1 message)
Birth announcement (1 message)
Bog Oak (2 messages)
Busking in Seattle! (2 messages)
Chopin Early Editions (1 message)
Chris Nobbs email (3 messages)
clementi (2 messages)
Concert report from Frozen Michigan (1 message)
Contact info for Gustav Leonhardt? (3 messages)
Contemporary descriptions of the Pedal Harpsichord (1 message)
Cool new CD (2 messages)
Dances in Church (5 messages)
Dances revisited (1 message)
Delius the expatriot's patron? (16 messages)
Der anstößige CPE Bach? (1 message)
desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire (8 messages)
desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first (29 messages)
desynchronized hands... (8 messages)
Douglas Fir (2 messages)
drastic arts funding cuts (1 message)
Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort? (2 messages)
Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort? notation tablature (2 messages)
early Leonhardt... (5 messages)
Editorial Reviews (2 messages)
Fascism and music (long; TAN; contentious) (4 messages)
Figured bass question (17 messages)
Figured bass question and style (1 message)
financing transportation (2 messages)
Fw: FIMTE (1 message)
GL (4 messages)
Harpsichord Glues (5 messages)
Harpsichord Kit and space concerns and tools (4 messages)
harpsichord on the air (5 messages)
Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol (13 messages)
Harpsichord recitals in NYC (1 message)
Harpsichords in Costa Rica (2 messages)
Hornpipe (was purcell) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2003 to 18 Feb 2003 (#2003-52) (2 messages)
Iggerance, Madame, Pure Iggerance (1 message)
in defense of Don Pablo (3 messages)
in memoriam Ivan de Halleux (1 message)
Inexpensive copies of Rousset's D'Anglebert set in NYC (5 messages)
jargon (1 message)
lautenwerk (1 message)
Le Pupitre scores (4 messages)
leading trebles, rushing basses (1 message)
leading trebles, rushing basses and standard 19th century practice (1 message)
leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first] (8 messages)
Leonhardt in Forqueray's "La d'Aubonne" (2 messages)
Les Arts Florissants tour (1 message)
Lou Harrison (1 message)
Lou Harrison recording (1 message)
Mea culpa (1 message)
more quill statistics (1 message)
Moyreau - was: Record reviews (1 message)
Mozart's rubato (1 message)
MP3s for Sonata Domenico, Fantasia di Ritorno, etc. (1 message)
Mr. Brookshire's critique (21 messages)
My harpsichord has finally arrived! (1 message)
Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron? (6 messages)
no harpsichord on the air (43 messages)
NYC concert announcement (1 message)
OT on earlier post (2 messages)
OT: in defense of Don Pau (2 messages)
Pedal Harpsichord CD (1 message)
Pedal-h Bach (5 messages)
Pedal-h Bach (was Cool new CD) (2 messages)
pluck sequence (2 messages)
plucking sequence (5 messages)
Purcell (7 messages)
Purcell [was Re: Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?] (3 messages)
Réf. : Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol (1 message)
Record reviews (2 messages)
Record reviews/Rameau (1 message)
Recordings v. "live" (12 messages)
repeats in binary forms [was Re: sinisterity] (2 messages)
rhythm in finale of Brandenburg 5 (2 messages)
Rubato, was Desynchronized hands (1 message)
Saint-Saens' edition of Rameau (4 messages)
schmalz and language, OT, or is it? (2 messages)
schmalz, gauche and language (6 messages)
secco recit (Telemann and Leonhardt) (1 message)
Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt... (6 messages)
sinisterity (2 messages)
sinisterity and brain processes (3 messages)
sinisterity and practice (6 messages)
Soundboard sizing (3 messages)
temperaments: Werckmeister etc (6 messages)
temperaments: werckmesiter etc (9 messages)
the 1619 Johann Mayer harpsichord (3 messages)
The missing links (1 message)
The Role of the Nazis etc., last time (14 messages)
The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s (10 messages)
The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach PerformanceTradition of the 1930s (1 message)
Time signatures: 3 vs 3/4 in Dandrieu (1 message)
Tuning down (3 messages)
Tuning pins (7 messages)
tuning/thick strings (26 messages)
various partita movements and the desync-touch (8 messages)
Verdier (5 messages)
visit to Seattle (2 messages)
Viz: To Wit (1 message)
Werckmeister (1 message)
Werckmeister, temperament, and continuo (1 message)
Windsor 1896 was Re: temperaments: werckmeister etc (2 messages)
Zukerman harpsichord parts (5 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricades misterieuses)

Re: "1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricades misterieuses)

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 11:37:44 -0500

28 lines

Re: "1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricades misterieuses)

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 11:47:35 -0500

21 lines

Re: "1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricades misterieuses)

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:38:46 -0500

32 lines

Re: "1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricades misterieuses)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:27:39 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

"1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricadesmisterieuses)

Re: "1 ovvero 2 redux" in Rameau (was: Les Barricadesmisterieuses)

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 12:01:43 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

"Mozart and the Keyboard Culture of His Time."

"Mozart and the Keyboard Culture of His Time."

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 15:27:19 +0100

20 lines

Re: "Mozart and the Keyboard Culture of His Time."

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 10:14:49 -0600

31 lines

New Thread

"Reflections" for harpsichord

"Reflections" for harpsichord

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:13:39 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

***Re: The Role of the Nazis -- implicit warning, political content

***Re: The Role of the Nazis -- implicit warning, political content

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 09:44:42 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

16e hchds with 8 4

Re: 16e hchds with 8 4

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:43:53 +0000

22 lines

New Thread

a 17th century Italian "ordinary" temperament

a 17th century Italian "ordinary" temperament

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 23:18:27 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Address for Bob Heath

Address for Bob Heath

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 19:43:32 -0600

16 lines

Re: Address for Bob Heath

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:39:41 EST

22 lines

New Thread

archives access?

archives access?

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:56:15 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

ARGH!

ARGH!

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:41:31 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Awfully quiet

Awfully quiet

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 12:42:18 -0600

16 lines

Re: Awfully quiet

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 14:46:41 -0800

31 lines

Re: Awfully quiet

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 18:34:35 -0500

28 lines

Re: Awfully quiet

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 19:29:53 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Awfully quiet / ice

Re: Awfully quiet / ice

tshall01 <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:46:47 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Awfully quiet and tuning/thick strings

Re: Awfully quiet and tuning/thick strings

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 11:20:51 -0800

39 lines

New Thread

Birth announcement

Birth announcement

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:01:11 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

Bog Oak

Bog Oak

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 08:16:02 -0000

18 lines

Re: Bog Oak

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:17:46 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Busking in Seattle!

Busking in Seattle!

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 12:04:01 -0800

81 lines

Re: Busking in Seattle!

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:21:30 -0800

14 lines

New Thread

Chopin Early Editions

Chopin Early Editions

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:15:33 +0100

88 lines

New Thread

Chris Nobbs email

Chris Nobbs email

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 09:42:49 -0500

17 lines

Re: Chris Nobbs email

John, Richard <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 10:02:23 -0500

26 lines

Re: Chris Nobbs email

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 10:39:51 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

clementi

clementi

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:58:24 -0500

26 lines

Re: clementi

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:34:30 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Concert report from Frozen Michigan

Concert report from Frozen Michigan

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 20:14:10 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Contact info for Gustav Leonhardt?

Contact info for Gustav Leonhardt?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 08:04:54 -0800

14 lines

Re: Contact info for Gustav Leonhardt?

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 19:26:01 +0100

26 lines

Re: Contact info for Gustav Leonhardt?

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:35:52 -0800

13 lines

New Thread

Contemporary descriptions of the Pedal Harpsichord

Contemporary descriptions of the Pedal Harpsichord

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:36:41 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Cool new CD

Re: Cool new CD

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 09:17:09 +0100

29 lines

Re: Cool new CD

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 08:33:32 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Dances in Church

Re: Dances in Church

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 02:15:25 -0500

22 lines

Re: Dances in Church

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:09:02 -0500

40 lines

Re: Dances in Church

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:03:37 -0500

35 lines

Re: Dances in Church

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 20:41:43 -0500

22 lines

Re: Dances in Church

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:18:58 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Dances revisited

Re: Dances revisited

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 03:37:55 EST

27 lines

New Thread

Delius the expatriot's patron?

Delius the expatriot's patron?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:39:57 -0500

22 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:04:15 -0700

30 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 12:53:01 -0500

35 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 00:03:50 +0100

24 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 17:01:47 -0700

28 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:01:52 -0500

18 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 23:21:31 -0500

21 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:14:40 EST

24 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 00:49:00 -0500

41 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:32:12 -0500

29 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:36:23 -0500

21 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:34:30 -0700

24 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:33:24 -0500

32 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:24:12 -0700

29 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:25:21 -0500

18 lines

Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:49:20 EST

16 lines

New Thread

Der anstößige CPE Bach?

Der anstößige CPE Bach?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 11:24:52 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:36:12 -0500

89 lines

Re: desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:06:50 -0500

10 lines

Re: desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 17:10:43 -0500

61 lines

Re: desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:17:59 -0800

53 lines

Re: desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 19:13:29 -0500

31 lines

Re: desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:44:37 -0500

115 lines

Re: desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:45:24 -0500

26 lines

Re: desync hands, etc., from Bradley Brookshire

Bradley Brookshire <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:26:19 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 14:57:06 -0500

94 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 16:29:37 -0500

72 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 22:46:59 +0100

141 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 17:00:14 -0600

116 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 03:20:01 +0100

27 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 21:52:36 -0500

98 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:33:33 -0500

38 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 09:14:49 -0500

58 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 09:49:01 -0500

21 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:12:05 +0100

40 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 12:15:10 -0500

269 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 15:38:51 -0500

55 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 13:20:06 -0800

72 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 22:44:48 +0100

29 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:06:47 -0500

34 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 10:40:42 -0500

26 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:36:11 -0700

36 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 12:43:27 -0500

40 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:33:30 -0500

51 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:42:54 +0100

112 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 14:15:17 -0500

21 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:04:45 -0500

22 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 18:23:01 -0500

41 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:15:09 EST

31 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:20:52 EST

26 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:22:58 -0500

48 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:22:42 -0600

36 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Micaela Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:41:12 -0000

62 lines

Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:45:58 +0100

53 lines

New Thread

desynchronized hands...

desynchronized hands...

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 09:43:48 -0500

133 lines

Re: desynchronized hands...

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:11:02 -0500

55 lines

Re: desynchronized hands...

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 00:02:38 -0500

24 lines

Re: desynchronized hands...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 12:59:32 -0500

42 lines

Re: desynchronized hands...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 13:10:55 -0500

47 lines

Re: desynchronized hands...

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:04:32 -0500

58 lines

Re: desynchronized hands...

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 16:04:31 -0500

20 lines

Re: desynchronized hands...

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:20:27 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Douglas Fir

Douglas Fir

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:46:03 EST

38 lines

Re: Douglas Fir

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:29:52 +1030

26 lines

New Thread

drastic arts funding cuts

drastic arts funding cuts

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 22:23:02 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort?

Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 17:14:13 -0500

48 lines

Re: Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort?

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 16:01:53 -0800

57 lines

New Thread

Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort? notation tablature

Re: Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort? notation tablature

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:04:59 +0100

180 lines

Re: Early Baroque music -- for keyboard or for consort? notation tablature

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:16:58 -0500

65 lines

New Thread

early Leonhardt...

early Leonhardt...

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:13:26 -0500

31 lines

Re: early Leonhardt...

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:26:48 -0500

24 lines

Re: early Leonhardt...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:28:15 -0500

39 lines

Re: early Leonhardt...

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:57:24 -0500

45 lines

Re: early Leonhardt...

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 19:34:42 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Editorial Reviews

Editorial Reviews

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 17:32:35 -0500

141 lines

Re: Editorial Reviews

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:47:01 -0500

150 lines

New Thread

Fascism and music (long; TAN; contentious)

Fascism and music (long; TAN; contentious)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:39:59 -0500

161 lines

Re: Fascism and music (long; TAN; contentious)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:25:50 -0700

16 lines

Re: Fascism and music (long; TAN; contentious)

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:29:33 -0600

28 lines

Re: Fascism and music (long; TAN; contentious)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 07:37:51 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

Figured bass question

Figured bass question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 11:32:10 -0500

29 lines

Re: Figured bass question

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:17:39 -0500

13 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Janet E. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:20:44 -0500

58 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Janet E. Scott <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:24:30 -0500

28 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:42:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Larry Kent <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 03:01:13 +0000

56 lines

Re: Figured bass question

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 10:10:42 EST

28 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:36:36 -0500

49 lines

Re: Figured bass question

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 11:51:25 -0500

25 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:28:44 -0500

21 lines

Figured bass question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 02:30:40 -0800

25 lines

Figured bass question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:33:36 -0800

32 lines

Re: Figured bass question

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 16:10:11 -0500

13 lines

Re: Figured bass question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 17:02:50 -0500

17 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 00:37:10 -0800

27 lines

Re: Figured bass question

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 09:18:18 -0500

53 lines

Figured bass question

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 17:06:00 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Figured bass question and style

Re: Figured bass question and style

Micaela Schmitz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 14:24:09 -0000

67 lines

New Thread

financing transportation

financing transportation

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 08:31:07 -0500

24 lines

Re: financing transportation

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 09:20:17 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

Fw: FIMTE

Fw: FIMTE

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 12:30:58 -0500

120 lines

New Thread

GL

Re: GL

joost <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:35:40 +0100

19 lines

GL

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 16:28:39 -0000

16 lines

Re: GL

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:28:12 -0600

29 lines

Re: GL

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 18:19:40 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Glues

Harpsichord Glues

Richard Shagam <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 15:22:27 -0800

47 lines

Harpsichord Glues

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 19:44:46 EST

65 lines

Re: Harpsichord Glues

Richard Schaumloffel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 12:54:22 +1030

48 lines

Re: Harpsichord Glues

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 21:34:31 +0100

93 lines

Re: Harpsichord Glues

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 15:03:14 -0600

26 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Kit and space concerns and tools

Harpsichord Kit and space concerns and tools

Sean <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:46:09 -0500

14 lines

Re: Harpsichord Kit and space concerns and tools

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:32:05 -0700

49 lines

Re: Harpsichord Kit and space concerns and tools

Richard Shagam <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:50:52 -0800

74 lines

Re: Harpsichord Kit and space concerns and tools

Michael Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 12:28:49 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

harpsichord on the air

harpsichord on the air

Ray Vukcevich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:23:26 -0800

19 lines

Re: Harpsichord on the air

Sandra Steere <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:06:01 -0500

11 lines

Re: harpsichord on the air

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:21:57 -0800

15 lines

Re: harpsichord on the air

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:59:13 -0500

28 lines

Re: harpsichord on the air

Ray Vukcevich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 10:49:32 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 11:13:11 +0100

71 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 08:29:44 -0500

37 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 12:52:26 -0600

90 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 21:34:05 -0000

44 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:25:28 -0500

33 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:34:29 +0100

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:05:03 -0600

56 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 12:45:20 -0500

50 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:15:08 -0700

34 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:41:27 -0500

30 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:01:38 EST

54 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:03:19 -0500

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:08:33 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord recitals in NYC

Harpsichord recitals in NYC

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:17:05 EST

29 lines

New Thread

Harpsichords in Costa Rica

Harpsichords in Costa Rica

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 13:19:54 EST

17 lines

Harpsichords in Costa Rica

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:49:05 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Hornpipe (was purcell)

Hornpipe (was purcell)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 14:26:19 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2003 to 18 Feb 2003 (#2003-52)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2003 to 18 Feb 2003 (#2003-52)

Johan Norrback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 20:54:37 +0100

121 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2003 to 18 Feb 2003 (#2003-52)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 02:41:45 -0500

52 lines

New Thread

Iggerance, Madame, Pure Iggerance

Iggerance, Madame, Pure Iggerance

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:32:55 -0800

94 lines

New Thread

in defense of Don Pablo

in defense of Don Pablo

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:43:39 -0500

43 lines

Re: in defense of Don Pablo

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:45:23 -0500

32 lines

Re: in defense of Don Pablo

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 08:55:33 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

in memoriam Ivan de Halleux

in memoriam Ivan de Halleux

Alain ANSELM <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 05:19:40 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

Inexpensive copies of Rousset's D'Anglebert set in NYC

Inexpensive copies of Rousset's D'Anglebert set in NYC

John Wall <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 21:29:01 +0000

27 lines

Re: Inexpensive copies of Rousset's D'Anglebert set in NYC

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 00:20:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: Inexpensive copies of Rousset's D'Anglebert set in NYC

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 02:21:44 EST

24 lines

Re: Inexpensive copies of Rousset's D'Anglebert set in NYC

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 08:55:28 -0500

23 lines

Re: Inexpensive copies of Rousset's D'Anglebert set in NYC

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 18:35:52 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

jargon

Re: jargon

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 15:03:55 -0700

82 lines

New Thread

lautenwerk

lautenwerk

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:02:39 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Le Pupitre scores

Re: Le Pupitre scores

Ray Ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 11:24:33 -0600

16 lines

Re: Le Pupitre scores

ZAPPULLA Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:18:32 -0800

28 lines

Re: Le Pupitre scores

Sandra Steere <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:38:06 -0500

12 lines

Re: Le Pupitre scores

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:42:19 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

leading trebles, rushing basses

leading trebles, rushing basses

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:06:34 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

leading trebles, rushing basses and standard 19th century practice

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses and standard 19th century practice

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 18:19:45 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 22:41:16 +0100

39 lines

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 16:49:55 -0500

40 lines

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:34:16 -0500

34 lines

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 23:55:21 +0100

72 lines

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 23:59:30 +0100

44 lines

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:05:10 -0500

32 lines

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:36:36 -0500

19 lines

Re: leading trebles, rushing basses [was Re: Re: desynchronized hands, with right hand playing first]

Marcus Reeves <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:59:54 -0000

21 lines

New Thread

Leonhardt in Forqueray's "La d'Aubonne"

Leonhardt in Forqueray's "La d'Aubonne"

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:27:22 -0500

37 lines

Re: Leonhardt in Forqueray's "La d'Aubonne"

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 22:54:03 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Les Arts Florissants tour

Les Arts Florissants tour

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:18:16 +1100

44 lines

New Thread

Lou Harrison

Lou Harrison

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:48:33 -0500

51 lines

New Thread

Lou Harrison recording

Lou Harrison recording

Elaine Funaro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 20:54:49 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Mea culpa

Mea culpa

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 10:15:44 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

more quill statistics

more quill statistics

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 08:10:27 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

Moyreau - was: Record reviews

Moyreau - was: Record reviews

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:03:42 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Mozart's rubato

Mozart's rubato

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 17:56:55 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

MP3s for Sonata Domenico, Fantasia di Ritorno, etc.

MP3s for Sonata Domenico, Fantasia di Ritorno, etc.

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 07:57:53 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Mr. Brookshire's critique

Mr. Brookshire's critique

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 15:26:09 -0800

46 lines

Mr. Brookshire's critique

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 16:37:22 -0800

142 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Bradley Brookshire <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 20:24:58 -0500

119 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 06:44:36 -0500

29 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 09:12:01 -0500

77 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 11:55:04 -0500

140 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 12:28:31 -0500

38 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

David Rogers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 10:39:31 -0800

67 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 14:04:49 -0500

114 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 22:53:50 -0800

30 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:21:45 -0500

34 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Bradley Brookshire <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:51:53 -0500

63 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 00:29:59 EST

35 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 07:11:26 -0500

76 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:24:08 -0500

51 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 09:33:00 -0500

47 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:00:01 -0500

23 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:45:57 -0500

24 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:50:31 -0500

30 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:50:08 -0800

169 lines

Re: Mr. Brookshire's critique

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:02:03 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

My harpsichord has finally arrived!

My harpsichord has finally arrived!

Vicky RH <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 01:07:20 +0000

66 lines

New Thread

Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron?

Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 07:46:50 -0500

39 lines

Re: Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 09:10:18 -0700

55 lines

Re: Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron?

Davis, Leland E. <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:08:05 -0600

71 lines

Re: Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:12:11 -0700

82 lines

Re: Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron?

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 17:16:10 -0500

18 lines

Re: Native Shores, was Delius the expatriot's patron?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 21:49:17 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

no harpsichord on the air

no harpsichord on the air

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:37:56 -0500

56 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:28:25 -0700

87 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 08:30:32 -0800

110 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Alfred Eberle <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 09:37:02 -0800

47 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 10:49:49 -0800

87 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:15:25 EST

19 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:00:46 -0500

39 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:05:23 -0500

42 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:20:18 EST

29 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:05:50 -0700

30 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:20:24 -0600

24 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:55:50 -0500

41 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:50:12 EST

19 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 16:58:51 -0600

28 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 17:03:10 -0600

30 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:22:48 -0500

32 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:00:52 -0500

30 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:21:42 -0500

41 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:10:01 EST

35 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:56:36 -0500

24 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:54:45 -0800

56 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:11:18 -0800

65 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:25:25 -0500

26 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:02:49 +0000

24 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:05:02 +0000

30 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:16:39 +0000

132 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:50:40 -0500

26 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 07:54:59 -0800

41 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:02:51 -0800

32 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:14:35 -0500

46 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 08:16:23 -0800

25 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Gregg Feigelson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 11:23:38 -0500

35 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 12:57:42 -0500

30 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 20:18:14 -0700

51 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:24:57 -0500

49 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 14:03:39 -0500

39 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:41:41 -0700

18 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:00:07 -0500

30 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:00:45 -0500

22 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:02:12 -0700

21 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:05:04 -0700

29 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:11:24 -0500

84 lines

Re: no harpsichord on the air

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:28:38 -0700

117 lines

New Thread

NYC concert announcement

NYC concert announcement

Bruce Garetz <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 11:29:14 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

OT on earlier post

OT on earlier post

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 03:57:30 -0500

13 lines

Re: OT on earlier post

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 08:28:38 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

OT: in defense of Don Pau

OT: in defense of Don Pau

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 10:52:06 -0500

37 lines

Re: OT: in defense of Don Pau

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:33:04 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Pedal Harpsichord CD

Pedal Harpsichord CD

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 14:52:58 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Pedal-h Bach

Re: Pedal-h Bach

Sandra Steere <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 12:06:07 -0500

11 lines

Re: Pedal-h Bach

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 13:12:47 -0500

21 lines

Pedal-h Bach

DSA <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 08:01:37 -0000

17 lines

Re: Pedal-h Bach

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 07:22:43 -0600

27 lines

Re: Pedal-h Bach

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:45:43 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Pedal-h Bach (was Cool new CD)

Re: Pedal-h Bach (was Cool new CD)

Paul Masser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:33:08 EST

18 lines

Re: Pedal-h Bach (was Cool new CD)

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 17:06:48 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

pluck sequence

pluck sequence

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:08:36 -0500

48 lines

Re: pluck sequence

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:34:16 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

plucking sequence

plucking sequence

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 18:48:34 -0000

18 lines

plucking sequence

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 19:49:21 -0500

50 lines

Re: plucking sequence

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:28:15 -0500

42 lines

Re: plucking sequence

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 23:08:45 -0600

17 lines

Re: plucking sequence

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 22:34:18 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Purcell

Re: Purcell

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 17:59:13 -0800

33 lines

Re: Purcell

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:09:30 -0700

21 lines

Re: Purcell

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 12:14:46 -0700

33 lines

Re: Purcell

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:27:34 -0500

38 lines

Re: Purcell

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 17:22:19 -0700

49 lines

Re: Purcell

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 21:40:46 -0500

24 lines

Re: Purcell

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 08:11:06 -0700

33 lines

New Thread

Purcell [was Re: Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?]

Purcell [was Re: Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 19:57:48 +0100

27 lines

Re: Purcell [was Re: Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?]

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 14:18:28 -0500

61 lines

Re: Purcell [was Re: Re: Delius the expatriot's patron?]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 20:49:59 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Réf. : Re: Harpsichord or clavichord as political or social symbol

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 09:48:53 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

Record reviews

Record reviews

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 15:06:12 -0600

36 lines

Re: Record reviews

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 14:47:14 CET

19 lines

New Thread

Record reviews/Rameau

Re: Record reviews/Rameau

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 18:22:36 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Recordings v. "live"

Recordings v. "live"

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:25:09 -0500

42 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 10:07:43 -0500

50 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 13:15:55 -0500

24 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:22:49 EST

31 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 11:58:46 -0500

75 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 09:59:42 -0800

51 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

David Cates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 10:03:23 -0800

120 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 13:30:02 EST

34 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 23:09:44 +0100

30 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 21:50:51 -0500

23 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:56:30 -0600

38 lines

Re: Recordings v. "live"

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 09:05:57 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

repeats in binary forms [was Re: sinisterity]

repeats in binary forms [was Re: sinisterity]

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 13:27:13 +0100

60 lines

Re: repeats in binary forms [was Re: sinisterity]

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 16:31:05 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

rhythm in finale of Brandenburg 5

rhythm in finale of Brandenburg 5

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:10:35 -0500

39 lines

Re: rhythm in finale of Brandenburg 5

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 10:26:12 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Rubato, was Desynchronized hands

Rubato, was Desynchronized hands

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 19:01:23 -0600

18 lines

New Thread

Saint-Saens' edition of Rameau

Saint-Saens' edition of Rameau

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:55:53 -0500

42 lines

Re: Saint-Saens' edition of Rameau

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 11:03:33 -0800

67 lines

Re: Saint-Saens' edition of Rameau

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 14:17:42 EST

21 lines

Re: Saint-Saens' edition of Rameau

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 15:21:51 EST

20 lines

New Thread

schmalz and language, OT, or is it?

Re: schmalz and language, OT, or is it?

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 07:18:45 -0500

17 lines

Re: schmalz and language, OT, or is it?

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 10:13:09 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

schmalz, gauche and language

schmalz, gauche and language

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 18:30:07 -0500

100 lines

Re: schmalz, gauche and language

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:24:37 +0100

132 lines

Re: schmalz, gauche and language

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 11:53:20 -0500

28 lines

Re: schmalz, gauche and language

Bradley Brookshire <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 7 Feb 2003 14:05:53 -0500

25 lines

Re: schmalz, gauche and language

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 13:38:58 -0800

32 lines

Re: schmalz, gauche and language

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 01:06:07 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

secco recit (Telemann and Leonhardt)

secco recit (Telemann and Leonhardt)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 13:44:46 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt...

Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt...

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 16:58:00 EST

21 lines

Re: Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt...

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:39:56 +0100

50 lines

Re: Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt...

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 13:09:02 EST

16 lines

Re: Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 15:43:32 -0500

69 lines

Re: Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt...

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 18:00:18 -0500

48 lines

Re: Secco recit., was: early Leonhardt...

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 09:31:08 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

sinisterity

sinisterity

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 6 Feb 2003 17:04:27 -0500

55 lines

Re: sinisterity

Yann Morin <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 8 Feb 2003 16:05:02 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

sinisterity and brain processes

sinisterity and brain processes

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 13:11:13 -0500

67 lines

Re: sinisterity and brain processes

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 14:13:25 -0500

30 lines

sinisterity and brain processes

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 16:59:54 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

sinisterity and practice

Re: sinisterity and practice

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 04:54:29 -0500

33 lines

Re: sinisterity and practice

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 19:39:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: sinisterity and practice

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 9 Feb 2003 20:32:03 -0500

37 lines

Re: sinisterity and practice

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 09:21:42 -0700

100 lines

Re: sinisterity and practice

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 12:50:03 -0500

16 lines

Re: sinisterity and practice

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 10 Feb 2003 15:44:04 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Soundboard sizing

Re: Soundboard sizing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 00:21:53 -0500

25 lines

Re: Soundboard sizing

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 00:31:41 -0500

23 lines

Re: Soundboard sizing

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 03:56:16 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

temperaments: Werckmeister etc

temperaments: Werckmeister etc

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 14:33:08 +0100

274 lines

Re: temperaments: Werckmeister etc

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 17:56:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: temperaments: Werckmeister etc

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 04:06:54 -0500

74 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmeister etc

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:11:24 +0100

170 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmeister etc

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:34:39 +0100

55 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmeister etc

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 23:21:18 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Johan Norrback <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 18:28:06 +0100

159 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 08:38:00 -0500

60 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 10:13:19 -0500

67 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 13:55:07 -0500

25 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 15:24:13 -0500

22 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 22:28:11 +0100

21 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 17:49:56 -0500

31 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:15:19 -0500

29 lines

Re: temperaments: werckmesiter etc

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 27 Feb 2003 14:37:08 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

the 1619 Johann Mayer harpsichord

the 1619 Johann Mayer harpsichord

nick gardner <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 07:41:54 +0000

37 lines

Re: the 1619 Johann Mayer harpsichord

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 05:38:18 -0800

66 lines

Re: the 1619 Johann Mayer harpsichord

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 17:40:07 +0100

63 lines

New Thread

The missing links

The missing links

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 1 Feb 2003 13:10:16 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 17:27:09 -0500

29 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 10:31:55 -0800

57 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 19:00:35 -0500

22 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 23 Feb 2003 20:30:21 -0800

27 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 18:23:47 -0500

17 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:54:53 -0500

35 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Keith Paulson-Thorp <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:05:03 EST

32 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 19:34:59 -0600

30 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:55:48 -0800

49 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 20:59:22 -0800

28 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Daniel Jencka <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:04:57 -0800

29 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 00:12:03 -0500

35 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 25 Feb 2003 06:49:23 -0500

36 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis etc., last time

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 26 Feb 2003 12:36:59 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

Bradley Brookshire <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 16:05:26 -0500

155 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 17:55:26 -0500

30 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:29:02 -0500

21 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 19:01:06 -0600

25 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 23:19:08 -0500

27 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 07:34:50 -0500

42 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 08:38:36 -0600

56 lines

The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 10:16:13 -0500

47 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 10:43:15 -0500

36 lines

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach Performance Tradition of the 1930s

ZAPPULLA Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 10:18:54 -0800

202 lines

New Thread

The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach PerformanceTradition of the 1930s

Re: The Role of the Nazis in Shaping the Bach PerformanceTradition of the 1930s

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 14:13:22 -0500

48 lines

New Thread

Time signatures: 3 vs 3/4 in Dandrieu

Time signatures: 3 vs 3/4 in Dandrieu

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 11:52:26 EST

37 lines

New Thread

Tuning down

Tuning down

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 2 Feb 2003 20:10:43 -0800

23 lines

Re: Tuning down

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:14:25 -0600

26 lines

Re: Tuning down

Jonathan Rhodes Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 14:04:09 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Tuning pins

Tuning pins

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 09:20:31 -0500

34 lines

Re: Tuning pins

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 15:27:56 -0000

56 lines

Re: Tuning pins

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:12:10 -0500

26 lines

Re: Tuning pins

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 11:45:14 -0600

17 lines

Re: Tuning pins

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 14:56:54 -0500

38 lines

Re: Tuning pins

Henk Bruisten <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 21:28:56 +0100

76 lines

Re: Tuning pins

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 19:54:52 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

tuning/thick strings

Re: tuning/thick strings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 15:38:29 -0500

30 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 13:19:03 -0800

87 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 18:36:42 -0500

45 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 16 Feb 2003 22:05:18 -0500

84 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 10:10:07 -0500

70 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 19:02:34 -0500

30 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 01:03:25 -0800

23 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

randolph white <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 16:48:25 -0000

29 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 04:38:50 -0500

57 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 17 Feb 2003 22:01:31 -0500

42 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 12:31:32 -0500

27 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 13:38:59 -0500

63 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 16:50:57 -0500

55 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

ZAPPULLA Robert <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 07:40:57 -0800

22 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 13:33:39 -0500

41 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 19 Feb 2003 14:32:07 -0500

82 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 02:03:15 -0500

19 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:00:41 -0500

18 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 20 Feb 2003 23:11:45 -0500

32 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:55:46 +0000

38 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 09:31:53 -0500

33 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 12:45:55 -0500

66 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 00:52:07 -0500

33 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 01:03:59 -0500

21 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 22 Feb 2003 15:55:06 +0000

32 lines

Re: tuning/thick strings

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 24 Feb 2003 21:00:49 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

various partita movements and the desync-touch

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 13:47:36 -0500

41 lines

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:11:19 +0100

26 lines

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 20:23:10 +0100

38 lines

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 3 Feb 2003 15:25:33 -0500

23 lines

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:25:24 -0600

27 lines

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 21:29:40 -0600

32 lines

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 4 Feb 2003 22:50:39 -0500

27 lines

Re: various partita movements and the desync-touch

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 5 Feb 2003 06:51:44 -0600

32 lines

New Thread

Verdier

Verdier

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 22:10:13 -0500

31 lines

Re: Verdier

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 08:48:53 -0500

33 lines

Re: Verdier

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 09:59:55 -0500

46 lines

Re: Verdier

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 13 Feb 2003 19:53:15 -0500

45 lines

Re: Verdier

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 14 Feb 2003 08:14:39 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

visit to Seattle

visit to Seattle

Forrest Dillon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:45:52 -0500

21 lines

Re: visit to Seattle

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 11 Feb 2003 08:47:22 -0800

38 lines

New Thread

Viz: To Wit

Re: Viz: To Wit

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 31 Jan 2003 21:18:17 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

Werckmeister

Werckmeister

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 21 Feb 2003 05:11:26 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Werckmeister, temperament, and continuo

Werckmeister, temperament, and continuo

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 18 Feb 2003 04:41:18 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Windsor 1896 was Re: temperaments: werckmeister etc

Windsor 1896 was Re: temperaments: werckmeister etc

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 20:15:18 +0100

36 lines

Re: Windsor 1896 was Re: temperaments: werckmeister etc

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 28 Feb 2003 19:19:45 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Zukerman harpsichord parts

Zukerman harpsichord parts

Allan d'Autremont <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 01:16:12 -0600

14 lines

Re: Zukerman harpsichord parts

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 07:29:37 -0500

21 lines

Re: Zukerman harpsichord parts

Dan & Sandy Steadman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 14:49:51 -0500

41 lines

Re: Zukerman harpsichord parts

Allan d'Autremont <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:11:31 -0600

48 lines

Re: Zukerman harpsichord parts

Allan d'Autremont <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 12 Feb 2003 23:16:28 -0600

27 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu