LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2002


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!" (3 messages)
******Re: quick tool question (6 messages)
1652 Couchet (2 messages)
1652 COUCHET"My Mistake, please Pardon" (1 message)
a couple of recent portapiano gigs (1 message)
An Appeal etc. etc. (2 messages)
Another Z-Box restoration (6 messages)
APPEAL TO ALL LIST MEMBERS (6 messages)
bentside (3 messages)
bentside spinets (5 messages)
Breaking strings (19 messages)
Busking (6 messages)
Changing your Subscription Address -- ALL READ (1 message)
Clavecin brisé, was NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS (1 message)
Concert at the Library of Congress (1 message)
curator at Smithsonian (1 message)
Dances with Harpsichords (2 messages)
Edition for Lebegue (5 messages)
Eric Templeton (6 messages)
everybody gone fishing? (1 message)
facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow (5 messages)
facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow; a typical case of delayed failure (2 messages)
FINE PRINT "Spinster in the Attic" (2 messages)
Flower Music (15 messages)
Fwd: Re: Appeal to all List Members (1 message)
Gaspard le Roux's Works (1 message)
Happy Groundhog Day (4 messages)
Harmoniques Lausanne event (1 message)
Harpsichord on Ebay, #1515099111 (2 messages)
Harpsichord report (5 messages)
Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! ! (6 messages)
Harpsichord report --comments (12 messages)
Harpsichord venues (20 messages)
HELP with TOOLS (4 messages)
history of balance points (1 message)
hpschd venues (22 messages)
humidity and horror (1 message)
INFO HELP! (3 messages)
International Keyboard Concert (1 message)
International Keyboard Festival (1 message)
ISO Galuppi sonata scores (2 messages)
Italian stringing practice (7 messages)
Jack and guide replacements (Bolton?) (2 messages)
JND (1 message)
Joseph Wilbur Spencer memorial in Berkeley 2/02\02 (1 message)
King's Consort (1 message)
Latin motoes (5 messages)
Latin Motto/ Burton Clavichord Update (5 messages)
Malin wire (1 message)
Many Thanks All (1 message)
Michael Latcham address (2 messages)
middle-size clavicle kit (1 message)
NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS (7 messages)
New York Times sees hope (6 messages)
now bows (1 message)
NYC concert announcement (1 message)
nylon (11 messages)
nylon (once again) (1 message)
quick tool question (27 messages)
Réf. : Concert at the Library of Congress (1 message)
Réf. : ISO Galuppi sonata scores (1 message)
Ravel and things past (11 messages)
Re 1652 Couchet (4 messages)
Re Galuppi sonata scores (1 message)
RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST... (8 messages)
Re-Re-1652 Couchet (1 message)
Recording (22 messages)
recording - rf noise (7 messages)
recording noise (29 messages)
right before breaking (7 messages)
rustling (6 messages)
Saving strings (1 message)
scale and tension (96 messages)
scale and tension (fwd) (16 messages)
scaling & tention (1 message)
SET HPSCHD-L NOMAIL (1 message)
Son of Smoke & Blisters: The Old Guard vs. the Young Radicals (1 message)
Sperhake (3 messages)
Still voicing (1 message)
STRINGS, and another scenario (1 message)
STRINGS, and my new bentside spinet (2 messages)
Telemann (5 messages)
Templeton/Malcolm (1 message)
test (1 message)
Thanks! (1 message)
third thread (10 messages)
UBIQUITOUS BENTSIDE SPINET (2 messages)
Upcoming San Francisco event - cross posted (2 messages)
venues (1 message)
Voicing (5 messages)
voicing acoustics (3 messages)
[[log in to unmask]: Re: quick tool question] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!"

"THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!"

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 13:28:31 -0500

32 lines

Re: "THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!"

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:44:28 -0700

41 lines

Re: "THE BEST IN THE WORLD!!"

Philippe Navard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:53:08 +0100

57 lines

New Thread

******Re: quick tool question

******Re: quick tool question

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:08:30 -0500

45 lines

******Re: quick tool question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:21:28 -0500

54 lines

Re: ******Re: quick tool question

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:01:59 -0500

76 lines

Re: ******Re: quick tool question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:33:42 -0800

97 lines

Re: ******Re: quick tool question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:41:28 -0800

33 lines

Re: ******Re: quick tool question

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:14:06 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

1652 Couchet

1652 Couchet

ANDREAS KILSTRÖM <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Jan 2002 11:44:12 +0100

17 lines

Re: 1652 Couchet

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 05:29:40 -0800

54 lines

New Thread

1652 COUCHET"My Mistake, please Pardon"

1652 COUCHET"My Mistake, please Pardon"

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:15:49 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

a couple of recent portapiano gigs

a couple of recent portapiano gigs

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 00:52:33 -0800

87 lines

New Thread

An Appeal etc. etc.

An Appeal etc. etc.

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 17:33:52 +4813

31 lines

Re: An Appeal etc. etc.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:47:15 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Another Z-Box restoration

Another Z-Box restoration

Phil McBrain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:43:57 -0500

126 lines

Re: Another Z-Box restoration

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 21:35:35 -0000

160 lines

Re: Another Z-Box restoration

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 08:03:15 -0500

27 lines

Re: Another Z-Box restoration

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:44:36 -0600

176 lines

Re: Another Z-Box restoration

Philip McBrain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:04:02 -0500

27 lines

Re: Another Z-Box restoration

Andrew Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 20:10:03 +1100

18 lines

New Thread

APPEAL TO ALL LIST MEMBERS

APPEAL TO ALL LIST MEMBERS

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 05:40:27 -0800

56 lines

Re: APPEAL TO ALL LIST MEMBERS

Yann Morin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:01:09 +0100

16 lines

Re: Appeal to all List Members

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:55:31 +4813

38 lines

Re: Appeal to all List Members

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 21:08:51 -0500

36 lines

Re: Appeal to all List Members

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:09:16 -0500

29 lines

Re: Appeal to all List Members

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:53:34 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

bentside

Re: bentside

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:32:40 -0700

18 lines

Re: bentside

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:12:43 -0800

88 lines

Re: bentside

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:43:31 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

bentside spinets

bentside spinets

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 07:54:48 +0100

44 lines

Re: bentside spinets

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:52:33 -0500

21 lines

Re: bentside spinets

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:39:13 -0700

56 lines

Re: bentside spinets

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:14:57 -0500

25 lines

Re: bentside spinets

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:54:36 +4813

44 lines

New Thread

Breaking strings

Breaking strings

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 07:53:26 -0000

34 lines

Re: Breaking strings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:37:09 -0700

44 lines

Re: Breaking strings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 08:46:36 -0800

13 lines

Re: Breaking strings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 09:55:09 -0700

49 lines

Re: Breaking strings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 11:46:48 -0700

22 lines

Breaking strings

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 14:05:46 +4813

32 lines

Re: Breaking strings

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:38:52 -0800

49 lines

Re: Breaking strings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 09:37:15 -0800

21 lines

Re: Breaking strings

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:39:36 -0500

19 lines

Re: Breaking strings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 13:35:15 -0700

38 lines

Re: Breaking strings

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:17:13 -0500

69 lines

Re: Breaking strings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 22:50:38 -0700

45 lines

Re: Breaking strings

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 08:51:58 -0600

49 lines

Re: Breaking strings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 10:52:13 -0700

21 lines

Re: Breaking strings

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 13:47:10 -0500

67 lines

Re: Breaking strings

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:13:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: Breaking strings

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 18:57:12 -0500

23 lines

Re: Breaking strings

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 23:24:25 -0500

17 lines

Re: Breaking strings

Sloffer, Phillip C <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 07:55:25 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Busking

Busking

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 04:23:50 -0800

33 lines

Re: Busking

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:35:22 EST

29 lines

Re: Busking

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:42:34 -0700

62 lines

Re: Busking

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 17:18:43 -0500

41 lines

Re: Busking

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 19:22:53 -0800

47 lines

Re: Busking

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:57:54 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

Changing your Subscription Address -- ALL READ

Changing your Subscription Address -- ALL READ

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 22 Feb 2002 10:55:15 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Clavecin brisé, was NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

Re: Clavecin brisé, was NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 07:03:04 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Concert at the Library of Congress

Concert at the Library of Congress

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:12:39 EST

20 lines

New Thread

curator at Smithsonian

Re: curator at Smithsonian

Margaret Mikulska <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 03:37:46 -0500

31 lines

New Thread

Dances with Harpsichords

Dances with Harpsichords

Elaine Funaro <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:00:18 -0800

41 lines

Re: Dances with Harpsichords

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 01:04:33 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Edition for Lebegue

Edition for Lebegue

Philip McBrain <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 10:54:47 -0500

8 lines

Re: Edition for Lebegue

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:45:05 +0100

32 lines

Re: Edition for Lebegue

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 14:16:15 +0100

46 lines

Re: Edition for Lebegue

Philip McBrain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 08:53:34 -0500

11 lines

Re: Edition for Lebegue

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:24:33 EST

24 lines

New Thread

Eric Templeton

Eric Templeton

P. de Lasala <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 00:30:12 +1000

20 lines

Re: Eric Templeton

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:09:52 -0500

33 lines

Re: Eric Templeton

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:10:56 EST

13 lines

Re: Eric Templeton

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:26:10 +4813

27 lines

Re: Eric Templeton

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:28:27 +4813

23 lines

Re: Eric Templeton

P. de Lasala <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 21:48:01 +1000

14 lines

New Thread

everybody gone fishing?

everybody gone fishing?

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 22:38:36 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow

Re: facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:10:49 -0500

30 lines

Re: facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 14:32:49 -0500

27 lines

Re: facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:15:28 -0700

43 lines

Re: facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 15:19:56 -0600

16 lines

Re: facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:55:46 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow; a typical case of delayed failure

Re: facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow; a typical case of delayed failure

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 19:15:03 -0500

27 lines

Re: facts of life: holds today and bang tomorrow; a typical case of delayed failure

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 22:59:03 -0700

31 lines

New Thread

FINE PRINT "Spinster in the Attic"

FINE PRINT "Spinster in the Attic"

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 04:45:26 -0800

44 lines

Re: FINE PRINT "Spinster in the Attic"

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 08:29:14 +4813

25 lines

New Thread

Flower Music

Flower Music

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 11:47:15 EST

22 lines

Re: Flower Music

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:31:19 -0500

11 lines

Re: Flower Music

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:51:19 -0500

34 lines

Re: Flower Music

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:02:37 -0500

22 lines

Re: Flower Music

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:32:21 -0500

17 lines

Re: Flower Music

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:32:18 EST

21 lines

Re: Flower Music

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:10:19 EST

13 lines

Re: Flower Music

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:31:15 -0500

11 lines

Re: Flower Music

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 16:14:48 -0500

20 lines

Re: Flower Music

A S Caro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:10:09 -0800

34 lines

Re: Flower Music

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:01:29 -0500

30 lines

Re: Flower Music

A S Caro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 15:54:19 -0800

44 lines

Re: Flower Music

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 19:30:07 EST

18 lines

Re: Flower Music

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 04:43:34 -0500

20 lines

Re: Flower Music

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:57:19 EST

18 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Appeal to all List Members

Fwd: Re: Appeal to all List Members

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:14:21 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Gaspard le Roux's Works

Gaspard le Roux's Works

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 11:33:35 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Happy Groundhog Day

Happy Groundhog Day

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 12:27:48 -0500

18 lines

Re: Happy Groundhog Day

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 12:46:27 -0500

27 lines

Re: Happy Groundhog Day

Hal Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 22:53:50 -0600

31 lines

Re: Happy Groundhog Day

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 08:08:02 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Harmoniques Lausanne event

Harmoniques Lausanne event

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:40:35 EST

32 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord on Ebay, #1515099111

Harpsichord on Ebay, #1515099111

Philip Zaleski <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 14:46:01 -0500

21 lines

Re: Harpsichord on Ebay, #1515099111

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:47:17 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord report

Harpsichord report

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:31:01 -0500

46 lines

Re: Harpsichord report

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:19:13 -0500

64 lines

Re: Harpsichord report

Adam J. Decker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:08:29 -0500

198 lines

Re: Harpsichord report

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:25:02 -0500

30 lines

Re: Harpsichord report

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 22:57:28 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! !

Re: Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! !

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 13:45:58 -0800

108 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! !

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 17:04:37 -0500

19 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! !

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:43:15 -0800

33 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! !

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 16:13:37 -0700

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! !

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 23:25:35 -0500

40 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --AMEN ! ! !

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 23:27:28 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord report --comments

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 21:27:03 -0500

60 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 12:34:55 -0500

51 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:41:19 EST

22 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 14:46:06 EST

26 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:22:36 +0100

36 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 08:37:04 -0500

31 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 10:59:17 -0700

34 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 14:12:41 -0600

48 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 19:59:35 +4813

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:54:58 -0700

22 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 09:47:16 +0100

28 lines

Re: Harpsichord report --comments

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:29:05 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord venues

Harpsichord venues

Elaine Funaro <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 00:26:34 -0800

32 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 02:28:35 EST

21 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 09:49:24 -0600

22 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 12:19:28 -0500

43 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 13:14:47 -0600

36 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 11:11:19 -0800

17 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 11:32:11 -0800

66 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Elaine Funaro <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 14:40:17 -0800

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 17:18:50 -0500

39 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 17:19:43 -0500

23 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 17:24:41 -0500

50 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 20:42:45 +4813

23 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Robin Bigwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 13:27:24 +0000

20 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:28:13 -0700

56 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:00:43 -0500

39 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:01:04 -0600

15 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 21:04:29 -0500

35 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:28:22 -0500

25 lines

Re: harpsichord venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:26:49 -0700

19 lines

Re: Harpsichord venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 19:27:04 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

HELP with TOOLS

HELP with TOOLS

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:48:57 -0800

54 lines

Re: HELP with TOOLS

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:02:22 +0100

41 lines

Re: HELP with TOOLS

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:21:31 -0700

40 lines

Re: HELP with TOOLS

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:16:03 -0600

18 lines

New Thread

history of balance points

history of balance points

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:25:33 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

hpschd venues

hpschd venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 13:36:39 -0700

16 lines

Re: hpschd venues

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:45:45 -0500

15 lines

Re: hpschd venues

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:42:09 -0600

17 lines

Re: hpschd venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 15:55:47 -0700

20 lines

Re: hpschd venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:43:24 -0700

28 lines

Re: hpschd venues

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:00:53 -0500

42 lines

Re: hpschd venues

A S Caro <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:37:38 -0800

44 lines

Re: hpschd venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 19:55:19 -0700

58 lines

Re: hpschd venues

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 21:03:23 -0600

18 lines

Re: hpschd venues

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:35:00 -0500

26 lines

Re: hpschd venues

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 22:24:45 -0500

27 lines

Re: hpschd venues

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 23:02:09 -0500

34 lines

Re: hpschd venues

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 01:30:37 EST

26 lines

Re: hpschd venues

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 07:30:09 +0100

40 lines

Re: hpschd venues

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 06:30:49 -0500

18 lines

Re: hpschd venues

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:49:08 -0500

25 lines

Re: hpschd venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:30:06 -0700

19 lines

Re: hpschd venues

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:32:46 -0700

35 lines

Re: hpschd venues

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 10:49:18 -0500

31 lines

Re: hpschd venues

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:29:03 -0500

24 lines

Re: hpschd venues

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:15:19 -0600

21 lines

Re: hpschd venues

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 18:33:12 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

humidity and horror

humidity and horror

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 18:10:52 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

INFO HELP!

INFO HELP!

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:03:23 -0800

13 lines

Re: INFO HELP!

GTO <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 11:18:06 -0500

27 lines

Re: INFO HELP!

A S Caro <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:55:59 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

International Keyboard Concert

International Keyboard Concert

Elaine Funaro <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 08:24:03 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

International Keyboard Festival

International Keyboard Festival

Meg Irwin-Brandon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 10:18:22 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

ISO Galuppi sonata scores

ISO Galuppi sonata scores

David Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 06:11:39 -0600

29 lines

Re: ISO Galuppi sonata scores

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:37:08 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Italian stringing practice

Italian stringing practice

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 21:25:06 -0500

55 lines

Re: Italian stringing practice

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 22:35:57 -0500

30 lines

Re: Italian stringing practice

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 09:51:15 +0100

37 lines

Re: Italian stringing practice

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 14:33:26 +0100

31 lines

Re: Italian stringing practice

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:09:51 +0100

39 lines

Re: Italian stringing practice

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:09:57 -0800

111 lines

Re: Italian stringing practice

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 13:31:21 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Jack and guide replacements (Bolton?)

Jack and guide replacements (Bolton?)

Philip McBrain <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 16:02:29 -0500

22 lines

Re: Jack and guide replacements (Bolton?)

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 14:48:17 -0800

42 lines

New Thread

JND

Re: JND

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:26:30 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Joseph Wilbur Spencer memorial in Berkeley 2/02\02

Joseph Wilbur Spencer memorial in Berkeley 2/02\02

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 20:07:46 -0800

90 lines

New Thread

King's Consort

Re: King's Consort

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 10:01:52 -0700

16 lines

New Thread

Latin motoes

Latin motoes

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 11:55:08 +4813

26 lines

Re: Latin motoes

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 10:18:27 -0800

41 lines

Re: Latin motoes

Timothy S. Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 14:38:20 -0500

43 lines

Re: Latin motoes

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:02:23 -0500

20 lines

Re: Latin motoes

Philip McBrain <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 18:04:28 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Latin Motto/ Burton Clavichord Update

Latin Motto/ Burton Clavichord Update

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 14:31:28 EST

29 lines

Re: Latin Motto/ Burton Clavichord Update

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 10:59:45 -0500

19 lines

Re: Latin Motto/ Burton Clavichord Update

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 17:20:29 -0500

38 lines

Re: Latin Motto/ Burton Clavichord Update

joost <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 02:52:07 +0100

26 lines

Re: Latin Motto/ Burton Clavichord Update

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 06:48:17 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

Malin wire

Malin wire

Hal Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:31:46 -0600

22 lines

New Thread

Many Thanks All

Many Thanks All

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 10:26:25 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

Michael Latcham address

Michael Latcham address

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:23:19 -0600

11 lines

Re: Michael Latcham address

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 14:22:08 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

middle-size clavicle kit

middle-size clavicle kit

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 27 Feb 2002 11:45:22 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 15:06:17 -0800

49 lines

Re: NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 16:53:20 -0800

61 lines

Re: NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 20:38:57 -0500

24 lines

Re: NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

A S Caro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 17:37:52 -0800

87 lines

Re: NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 20:14:45 -0500

17 lines

Re: NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 20:36:53 -0600

35 lines

Re: NEW TOPIC ANY TAKERS

A S Caro <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 19:51:52 -0800

62 lines

New Thread

New York Times sees hope

New York Times sees hope

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 13:18:22 -0500

46 lines

Re: New York Times sees hope

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:50:55 EST

16 lines

Re: New York Times sees hope

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:13:51 -0500

29 lines

Re: New York Times sees hope

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:46:43 -0500

14 lines

Re: New York Times sees hope

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:21:23 -0500

33 lines

Re: New York Times sees hope

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:10:44 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

now bows

Re: now bows

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:12:42 -0700

83 lines

New Thread

NYC concert announcement

NYC concert announcement

Bruce Garetz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 10:49:50 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

nylon

nylon

Hal Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 22:38:41 -0600

19 lines

Re: nylon

PAUL LOWE <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 22:09:38 -0000

32 lines

Re: nylon

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 01:43:18 -0500

24 lines

Re: nylon

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:25:19 -0500

33 lines

Re: nylon

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:27:16 -0500

23 lines

Re: nylon

Timothy S. Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 08:36:32 -0500

35 lines

Re: Nylon

Jonathan Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 19 Feb 2002 23:06:40 -0800

32 lines

Re: Nylon

Adam J. Decker <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 06:38:12 -0500

88 lines

Re: Nylon

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 09:23:26 -0700

39 lines

Re: Nylon

Hal Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:46:30 -0600

32 lines

Re: Nylon

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 11:38:57 -0700

43 lines

New Thread

nylon (once again)

nylon (once again)

Hal Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 22:55:12 -0600

16 lines

New Thread

quick tool question

quick tool question

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:27:00 -0500

20 lines

Re: quick tool question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:33:32 -0500

19 lines

Re: quick tool question

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:33:01 EST

18 lines

Re: quick tool question

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:53:51 -0800

55 lines

Re: quick tool question

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:51:19 -0600

23 lines

Re: quick tool question

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:59:11 -0600

14 lines

Re: quick tool question

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:00:33 -0600

16 lines

Re: quick tool question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:35:45 -0800

32 lines

Re: quick tool question

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:44:26 -0500

27 lines

Re: quick tool question

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:00:28 -0500

67 lines

Re: quick tool question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:47:16 -0500

25 lines

Re: quick tool question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 16:10:09 -0800

18 lines

Re: quick tool question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:42:28 -0700

17 lines

Re: quick tool question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:46:38 -0700

36 lines

Re: quick tool question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:54:51 -0700

19 lines

Re: quick tool question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:00:44 -0700

13 lines

Re: quick tool question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 19:03:10 -0700

12 lines

Re: quick tool question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 18:04:46 -0800

25 lines

Re: quick tool question

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 22:27:32 -0600

16 lines

Re: quick tool question

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 00:22:14 -0500

35 lines

Re: quick tool question

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:33:35 +0100

32 lines

Re: quick tool question

Andrew and Diana Nolan <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 23:49:01 +1100

14 lines

Re: quick tool question

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 07:48:03 -0500

22 lines

Re: quick tool question

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:26:06 EST

24 lines

Re: quick tool question

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:29:43 -0800

17 lines

Re: quick tool question

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 00:55:16 -0800

25 lines

Re: quick tool question

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:40:42 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Concert at the Library of Congress

Réf. : Concert at the Library of Congress

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 09:13:08 +0100

14 lines

New Thread

Réf. : ISO Galuppi sonata scores

Réf. : ISO Galuppi sonata scores

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 12:40:29 +0100

11 lines

New Thread

Ravel and things past

Ravel and things past

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 23:47:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 09:06:07 -0000

33 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 09:16:58 -0500

40 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 10:09:54 -0700

24 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:05:15 -0500

44 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:53:35 -0700

38 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:36:36 -0500

35 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:47:07 -0600

23 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

Wanda Landowska KotF <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 15:13:33 EST

35 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

Luis Villalba <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 20:55:29 -0300

51 lines

Re: Ravel and things past

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:01:25 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

Re 1652 Couchet

Re 1652 Couchet

ANDREAS KILSTRÖM <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 12:46:52 +0100

23 lines

Re: Re 1652 Couchet

Andrea Restelli <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 01:20:00 +0200

32 lines

Re: Re 1652 Couchet

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 20:11:52 EST

28 lines

Re: Re 1652 Couchet

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 22:53:56 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Re Galuppi sonata scores

Re Galuppi sonata scores

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 15:58:16 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

Alain ANSELM <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 12:44:39 -0500

115 lines

Re: RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 14:38:19 -0500

28 lines

Re: RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 08:42:33 +0100

128 lines

Re: RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:28:43 -0500

76 lines

Re: RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:50:11 -0500

22 lines

Re: RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 20:43:25 +0100

67 lines

Re: RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 21:05:39 +0100

94 lines

Re: RE-APPEAL TO ALL LIST...

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:30:52 -0500

38 lines

New Thread

Re-Re-1652 Couchet

Re-Re-1652 Couchet

Marie de Plateville <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 09:24:04 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Recording

Re: Recording

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 00:49:54 -0500

28 lines

Re: recording

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:13:27 +4813

29 lines

Re: recording

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:35:53 -0500

21 lines

Re: recording

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:51:21 -0500

40 lines

Re: recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:21:03 -0700

39 lines

Re: recording

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 11:38:43 +0100

37 lines

Re: recording

Walter Greenwood <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:17:25 -0500

27 lines

Re: recording

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:10:59 -0600

19 lines

Re: recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:25:19 -0700

23 lines

Re: recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:27:47 -0700

24 lines

Re: recording

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:19:34 -0500

32 lines

Re: recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:06:12 -0700

35 lines

Re: recording

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 23:50:57 -0500

44 lines

Re: recording

D.C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 12:28:40 +0100

57 lines

Re: recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 08:52:31 -0700

24 lines

Re: recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 08:54:11 -0700

18 lines

Re: recording

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 11:54:37 -0500

23 lines

Re: recording

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 12:17:01 -0500

29 lines

Re: recording

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 14:19:46 -0500

26 lines

Re: recording

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 14:45:12 -0500

28 lines

Re: recording

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:06:28 +0100

43 lines

Re: recording

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 17:09:20 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

recording - rf noise

Re: recording - rf noise

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 07:51:47 -0600

24 lines

Re: recording - rf noise

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:06:45 +4813

29 lines

Re: recording - rf noise

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:46:48 -0500

21 lines

Re: recording - rf noise

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:59:07 -0600

19 lines

Re: recording - rf noise

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 12:03:05 -0500

16 lines

Re: recording - rf noise

Philippe Navard <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 18:40:25 +0100

29 lines

Re: recording - rf noise

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 13:03:59 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

recording noise

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 11:20:24 -0700

25 lines

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 13:29:36 -0700

16 lines

Re: recording noise

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:30:28 -0500

28 lines

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 16:11:25 -0700

61 lines

Re: recording noise

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 18:13:39 -0500

36 lines

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 17:18:05 -0700

31 lines

Re: recording noise

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:45:22 EST

35 lines

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 19:09:48 -0700

59 lines

Re: recording noise

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 20:54:41 -0500

23 lines

Re: recording noise

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 21:39:36 -0500

18 lines

Re: recording noise

Ray Lurie <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 1 Feb 2002 22:24:23 -0500

27 lines

Re: recording noise

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 10:47:59 -0500

48 lines

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 10:05:06 -0700

91 lines

Re: recording noise

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:35:25 -0500

76 lines

Re: recording noise

noel jones <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 15:19:14 -0500

45 lines

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 13:41:48 -0700

38 lines

Re: recording noise

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:35:40 -0600

25 lines

Re: recording noise

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 02:19:52 -0500

30 lines

Recording noise

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 10:10:07 +4813

35 lines

Re: recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 08:48:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: Recording noise

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 08:56:41 -0700

20 lines

Re: recording noise

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 13:38:33 -0500

67 lines

Re: recording noise

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 13:56:22 -0500

36 lines

Re: recording noise

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 15:47:12 -0500

35 lines

Re: recording noise

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 23:34:46 +0100

40 lines

Re: recording noise

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:00:59 -0500

30 lines

Re: recording noise

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:32:37 -0500

25 lines

Re: recording noise

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 18:39:45 -0500

26 lines

Re: recording noise

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 20:28:15 -0500

89 lines

New Thread

right before breaking

Re: right before breaking

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:59:29 -0700

21 lines

Re: right before breaking

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:34:03 -0700

19 lines

Re: right before breaking

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 19:56:15 -0500

67 lines

Re: right before breaking

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 21:05:13 -0600

17 lines

Re: right before breaking

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 07:45:15 +0100

39 lines

Re: right before breaking

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:45:23 +0000

40 lines

Re: right before breaking

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:46:51 +0000

31 lines

New Thread

rustling

Re: rustling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 14:26:30 -0700

21 lines

Re: rustling

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:37:40 -0500

39 lines

Re: rustling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 2 Feb 2002 16:03:59 -0700

35 lines

Re: rustling

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 02:11:33 -0500

53 lines

Re: rustling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 08:58:43 -0700

21 lines

Re: rustling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 3 Feb 2002 09:58:16 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

Saving strings

Saving strings

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:56:02 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

scale and tension

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:03:59 -0700

117 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:00:53 -0500

25 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 18:08:43 -0500

26 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 16:53:06 -0700

34 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 19:25:28 -0500

32 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 17:49:25 -0700

46 lines

Re: scale and tension

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 09:29:54 +0100

43 lines

Re: scale and tension

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 11:08:22 +0100

50 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:44:35 -0700

34 lines

Re: scale and tension

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 10:13:06 -0800

32 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 12:57:44 -0700

34 lines

Re: scale and tension

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 21:34:33 +0100

48 lines

Re: scale and tension

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 17:35:40 -0500

31 lines

Re: scale and tension

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 16:41:19 -0600

56 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:18:18 -0500

27 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:27:31 -0700

24 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:29:16 -0700

19 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 18:42:22 -0700

31 lines

Re: scale and tension

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:16:22 -0500

28 lines

Re: scale and tension

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 10 Feb 2002 23:26:17 -0500

31 lines

Re: scale and tension

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:51:15 +0100

33 lines

Re: scale and tension

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 08:29:43 +4813

52 lines

Re: scale and tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 15:19:20 +0000

52 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 09:25:29 -0700

18 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 12:22:04 -0500

64 lines

Re: scale and tension

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 14:16:05 -0500

43 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 13:40:23 -0700

63 lines

Re: scale and tension

M. S. Pettersen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:25:24 -0500

28 lines

Re: scale and tension

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 16:27:03 -0500

31 lines

Re: scale and tension

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 18:18:11 -0500

39 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 11 Feb 2002 17:10:21 -0700

52 lines

Re: scale and tension

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 06:52:10 +0100

38 lines

Re: scale and tension

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 10:44:06 +0100

43 lines

Re: scale and tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 11:40:05 +0000

92 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 07:54:30 -0500

34 lines

Re: scale and tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:49:56 +0000

32 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:44:38 -0500

30 lines

Re: scale and tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 14:58:52 +0000

32 lines

Re: scale and tension

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 15:53:29 -0000

14 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 08:59:29 -0700

36 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 09:03:09 -0700

22 lines

Re: scale and tension

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 12 Feb 2002 13:43:22 +4813

24 lines

Re: scale and tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 10:05:31 +0000

54 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:10:26 -0700

36 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:27:12 -0700

69 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 09:29:26 -0700

11 lines

Re: scale and tension

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 08:57:07 -0800

107 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:49:26 -0500

22 lines

Re: scale and tension

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:34:37 -0600

84 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:46:08 -0700

29 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:04:04 -0500

22 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 11:01:26 -0800

103 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 12:43:06 -0700

31 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:51:46 -0500

64 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:27:31 -0700

44 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 13:51:50 -0700

24 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:40:13 -0700

21 lines

Re: scale and tension

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:00:22 -0500

64 lines

Re: scale and tension

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:39:39 -0500

20 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 15:52:44 -0700

93 lines

Re: scale and tension

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 14:53:11 -0800

58 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:01:50 -0700

24 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:24:04 -0700

24 lines

Re: scale and tension

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 16:44:29 -0800

16 lines

Re: scale and tension

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:04:03 -0500

42 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:21:13 -0800

37 lines

Re: scale and tension

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 20:38:21 -0600

20 lines

Re: scale and tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:36:47 +0000

30 lines

Re: scale and tension

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:55:59 +0100

18 lines

Re: scale and tension

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 22:45:13 -0500

27 lines

Re: scale and tension

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 11:26:47 -0500

32 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:41:56 -0700

37 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:38:21 -0700

46 lines

Re: scale and tension

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:27:48 -0500

36 lines

Re: scale and tension

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:27:48 -0500

18 lines

Re: scale and tension

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:00:27 -0500

33 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:08:14 -0500

52 lines

Re: scale and tension

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:13:52 -0500

23 lines

Re: scale and tension

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:32:53 -0500

26 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:28:35 -0700

40 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 13:31:30 -0700

21 lines

Re: scale and tension

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:17:53 -0500

57 lines

Re: scale and tension

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:17:54 -0500

41 lines

Re: scale and tension

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:05:34 +0100

30 lines

Re: scale and tension

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:40:40 -0600

25 lines

Re: scale and tension

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 20:48:46 -0600

15 lines

Re: scale and tension

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 23:49:07 EST

25 lines

Re: scale and tension

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:39:29 -0500

26 lines

Re: scale and tension

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 20:47:16 -0500

37 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:24:57 -0700

21 lines

Re: scale and tension

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 10:51:00 -0500

48 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 10:25:49 -0700

66 lines

Re: scale and tension

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 11:16:06 -0800

43 lines

Re: scale and tension

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 20:17:04 +0100

14 lines

Re: scale and tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 13:19:09 -0700

59 lines

Re: scale and tension

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 21 Feb 2002 16:21:49 -0800

72 lines

New Thread

scale and tension (fwd)

scale and tension (fwd)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 08:34:28 EST

121 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 14:00:10 +0000

28 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 09:25:54 -0600

140 lines

scale and tension (fwd)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:25:54 EST

84 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:04:17 -0600

14 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:01:33 -0700

126 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 15:05:29 -0700

13 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 19:05:32 -0600

20 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Andrew Nolan P/L <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 15:10:39 +1100

33 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 22:45:19 -0600

22 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 00:20:28 -0700

26 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 09:48:21 -0500

28 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Hal Brown <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 11:11:05 -0600

59 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 12:56:19 -0600

19 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 13:09:32 -0600

18 lines

Re: scale and tension (fwd)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 18 Feb 2002 23:13:38 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

scaling & tention

scaling & tention

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 17 Feb 2002 08:50:13 -0000

31 lines

New Thread

SET HPSCHD-L NOMAIL

SET HPSCHD-L NOMAIL

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 26 Feb 2002 03:29:51 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Son of Smoke & Blisters: The Old Guard vs. the Young Radicals

Son of Smoke & Blisters: The Old Guard vs. the Young Radicals

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 23 Feb 2002 08:53:37 -0800

37 lines

New Thread

Sperhake

Sperhake

Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 08:09:36 +0100

16 lines

Re: Sperhake

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 05:13:29 -0800

50 lines

Re: Sperhake

martin puehringer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 25 Feb 2002 14:26:46 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Still voicing

Still voicing

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 15:47:24 -0000

47 lines

New Thread

STRINGS, and another scenario

Re: STRINGS, and another scenario

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 09:28:45 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

STRINGS, and my new bentside spinet

STRINGS, and my new bentside spinet

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 05:29:36 -0800

68 lines

Re: STRINGS, and my new bentside spinet

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 14:08:18 +4813

53 lines

New Thread

Telemann

Re: Telemann

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 22:24:33 -0700

17 lines

Re: Telemann

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 10:14:59 -0500

27 lines

Re: Telemann

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 15:49:17 -0500

36 lines

Re: Telemann

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 14 Feb 2002 16:24:23 -0500

46 lines

Re: Telemann

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 15 Feb 2002 18:09:31 +0100

49 lines

New Thread

Templeton/Malcolm

Templeton/Malcolm

Ron Merner <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 16 Feb 2002 15:33:50 -0800

15 lines

New Thread

test

test

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 20 Feb 2002 07:47:44 +0100

10 lines

New Thread

Thanks!

Thanks!

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 28 Feb 2002 17:36:11 +4813

25 lines

New Thread

third thread

Re: third thread

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 08:48:19 -0700

25 lines

Re: third thread

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:01:22 -0500

33 lines

Re: third thread

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 11:32:13 -0500

129 lines

Re: third thread

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 09:39:50 -0700

23 lines

Re: third thread

Tony Hunt <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:26:20 EST

19 lines

Re: third thread

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:33:41 -0500

24 lines

Re: third thread

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 19:01:49 +0100

26 lines

Re: third thread

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 12:54:29 -0700

35 lines

Re: third thread

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 13:24:58 -0700

13 lines

Re: third thread

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Feb 2002 16:31:31 -0600

41 lines

New Thread

UBIQUITOUS BENTSIDE SPINET

UBIQUITOUS BENTSIDE SPINET

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 4 Feb 2002 10:20:24 -0800

70 lines

Re: UBIQUITOUS BENTSIDE SPINET

Peter W Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 5 Feb 2002 18:04:14 +4813

101 lines

New Thread

Upcoming San Francisco event - cross posted

Upcoming San Francisco event - cross posted

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:15:21 -0800

68 lines

Re: Upcoming San Francisco event - cross posted

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 14:52:12 EST

34 lines

New Thread

venues

venues

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 24 Feb 2002 11:21:27 -0800

26 lines

New Thread

Voicing

Voicing

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 16:53:08 -0000

25 lines

Re: Voicing

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 10:57:36 -0700

28 lines

Re: Voicing

Tilman Skowroneck <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 15:00:57 -0500

22 lines

Re: Voicing

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 18:19:03 -0700

40 lines

Re: Voicing

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 07:10:33 +0100

15 lines

New Thread

voicing acoustics

Re: voicing acoustics

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 7 Feb 2002 09:17:45 -0700

22 lines

Re: voicing acoustics

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 8 Feb 2002 18:39:22 -0600

34 lines

Re: voicing acoustics

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 9 Feb 2002 10:27:01 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

[[log in to unmask]: Re: quick tool question]

[[log in to unmask]: Re: quick tool question]

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 13 Feb 2002 17:18:45 -0800

30 lines

Advanced Options


Options

Log In

Log In

Get Password

Get Password


Search Archives

Search Archives


Subscribe or Unsubscribe

Subscribe or Unsubscribe


Archives

September 2017
August 2017
July 2017
June 2017
May 2017
April 2017
March 2017
February 2017
January 2017
December 2016
November 2016
October 2016
September 2016
August 2016
July 2016
June 2016
May 2016
April 2016
March 2016
February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
October 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
May 2004
April 2004
March 2004
February 2004
January 2004
December 2003
November 2003
October 2003
September 2003
August 2003
July 2003
June 2003
May 2003
April 2003
March 2003
February 2003
January 2003
December 2002
November 2002
October 2002
September 2002
August 2002
July 2002
June 2002
May 2002
April 2002
March 2002
February 2002
January 2002
December 2001
November 2001
October 2001
September 2001
August 2001
July 2001
June 2001
May 2001
April 2001
March 2001
February 2001
January 2001
December 2000
November 2000
October 2000
September 2000
August 2000
July 2000
June 2000
May 2000
April 2000
March 2000
February 2000
January 2000
December 1999
November 1999
October 1999
September 1999
August 1999
July 1999
June 1999
May 1999
April 1999
March 1999
February 1999
January 1999
December 1998
November 1998
October 1998
September 1998
August 1998
July 1998
June 1998
May 1998
April 1998
March 1998
February 1998
January 1998
December 1997
November 1997
October 1997
September 1997
August 1997
July 1997
June 1997
May 1997
April 1997
March 1997
February 1997
January 1997
December 1996
November 1996
October 1996
September 1996
August 1996
July 1996
June 1996
May 1996
April 1996
March 1996
February 1996
January 1996
December 1995
November 1995
October 1995
September 1995
August 1995
July 1995
June 1995
May 1995
April 1995
March 1995
February 1995
January 1995
December 1994
November 1994
October 1994
September 1994

ATOM RSS1 RSS2



LIST.UIOWA.EDU

UI LISTSERV Documentation | Questions? Contact the ITS Help Desk - (319) 384.HELP (4357) - its-helpdesk@uiowa.edu