LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


April 2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"Cellestini", aka The Space Shuttle (1 message)
"out of tune" recordings (1 message)
"The Harpsichord in Brazil". (1 message)
"Z" finished kit for sale, 1974 (1 message)
2-harpsichord music (18 messages)
2-harpsichord music (And Introduction) (1 message)
32/Badtrans@MM virus (1 message)
4ft hitchpin (3 messages)
4ft hitchpin rail (2 messages)
<No subject> (2 messages)
A note from a new list member (2 messages)
A Request (1 message)
A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite? (10 messages)
Administrative - ALL READ (1 message)
African Harpsichord Trunings (2 messages)
African Harpsichord Tunings (1 message)
all the thirds sharp (3 messages)
Angled soundboard grain (11 messages)
angled soundboards (1 message)
Arnault Clavicimbalum (4 messages)
Artie Shaw's harpsichord. (6 messages)
Bach toccata 910 / Buxtehude's organ tuning f#-minor BuxWV 146 (1 message)
Bach's Harpsichord (2 messages)
Bachs f#-toccata BWV 910 transposition? (2 messages)
Bad teachers, was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds (5 messages)
Baldwin hpschd (12 messages)
Baldwin hpschd, sound and micing (1 message)
Barbour's tables (1 message)
Baroque Rite of Spring; triplet gigues and movement order and such (4 messages)
beginning of French Suite 6 (3 messages)
bemf hpsch recitals (1 message)
Bizzi's harpsichords (6 messages)
Bohm suite #7 (5 messages)
Brandenburg surprises (was: Stokowski) (1 message)
Buxtehude recordings (2 messages)
BWV 1050 - Stokowski and Landowska (1 message)
Bye Bye! (2 messages)
Caleb Warner (1 message)
CDs available (2 messages)
Challis (4 messages)
Challis harpsichords (was: Philistines) (1 message)
Cheap Harpsichords (2 messages)
Choosing Instruments. (1 message)
Choosing Teachers / Instruments. (17 messages)
Church and State (3 messages)
co-incidences (1 message)
Computer software platforms. (6 messages)
Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You? (10 messages)
Concert announcement (1 message)
Concert in NYC (1 message)
Copyright of facsimiles /publication projet (1 message)
Copyright of facsimiles in the USA (3 messages)
Copyright of facsimiles in the USA (2) (2 messages)
Couchet1680- Blanchet1758- Taskin1781 SB painting removal MFA instrument (1 message)
counterpoint and hard work [was Re: tradition] (1 message)
creep and stuff (11 messages)
creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation (6 messages)
creep and stuff, or metallurgical enlightenment (2 messages)
critics (1 message)
cryogenic hardening (2 messages)
David Cates recital (tongue in cheek, mostly) (1 message)
Decent instruments (3 messages)
Different (harps.) strokes for different folks (5 messages)
DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes (6 messages)
E-bay instrument (1 message)
e-mail address request (1 message)
Easley Blackwood book (1 message)
Edith Picht-Axenfeld (2 messages)
English harpsichord (2 messages)
English Harpsichord; was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds (1 message)
Entre to Zuckermann needed (4 messages)
Euro-USD-transposition (4 messages)
f minor Toccata BWV 910 (was Italian harpsichord) (2 messages)
f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring (11 messages)
F# minor (12 messages)
f# minor and Paul's objections (1 message)
f# minor and Paul's objections (fwd) (3 messages)
fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..) (15 messages)
Finale vs. Sibelius (1 message)
fir abies alba (1 message)
fis-moll (4 messages)
folk harpsichord (10 messages)
Four Foot Hitchpin Rail (3 messages)
free music on line (1 message)
French double fatigue (was: Italian harpsichord) (1 message)
Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections (6 messages)
Froberger discography 2nd draft (2 messages)
Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript (7 messages)
Fw: Curator position (1 message)
FW: Ozark Engineering Test (6 messages)
FW:Re:hpschds in 50s pop (1 message)
Fwd: FW: Ozark Engineering Test (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Z-Book Availability (was Opera hpschds) (1 message)
f[is]-moll, summary (4 messages)
Game shows - OT (1 message)
Germanic Revivals other than in charming Santa Fe (1 message)
goodbye reconstruction? Silbermann Frauenkirche Dresden (1 message)
grain direction in Italian (4 messages)
Harpsichord Covers (1 message)
Harpsichord sites in Italy (4 messages)
HARPSICHORD WOODS (2 messages)
Haydn Seven Last Words (2 messages)
Hellendaal (3 messages)
help (4 messages)
Help for Judith: Acis and Galatea (2 messages)
HEM-FIR (3 messages)
hemfir (4 messages)
hpschd marketing basics was junk instruments (3 messages)
hpschd science and engineering (again) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 13 Apr 2001 to 14 Apr 2001 (#2001-119) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Apr 2001 to 20 Apr 2001 (#2001-127) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 2 Apr 2001 to 3 Apr 2001 (#2001-101) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 23 Apr 2001 to 24 Apr 2001 (#2001-131) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94) (1 message)
hpschds in 50s pop (2 messages)
idea (4 messages)
Import Duties on Harpsichords to USA (1 message)
In Durham, NC? (also somewhat off topic) (1 message)
In Paris? (off topic) (2 messages)
inauthentic? (was Jack's trip) (1 message)
Inharmonicity (for the 10,000th time) (1 message)
inharmonicity again (3 messages)
Interesting Relic on Ebay (2 messages)
Intonation - report from another planet (11 messages)
Italian harpsichord (26 messages)
Italian keyboards (10 messages)
Italian keyboards, sb wood (1 message)
James R Anthony (forwarded message) (1 message)
Japan happenings (1 message)
Jorgensen et al (7 messages)
junk instruments (1 message)
junk instruments, was Opera hpschds (52 messages)
K.G. recital (3 messages)
Korg OT-12 (3 messages)
Korh MT1200 (6 messages)
La Mancha 1 (Neidhardt 1) (1 message)
La Mancha 1 (Neidhardt 1) analysis, better layout (1 message)
language arrogance and brevity (7 messages)
language arrogance: theory vs. reality (1 message)
language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyw... (1 message)
language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway) (7 messages)
language brevity (now completely off-topic,but perhaps interesting anyway) (2 messages)
Levin's clavichord in WTC II (1 message)
Lindley on Bach (was f#) (1 message)
luteharp (12 messages)
Marpurg v Kirnberger on the mat, redux (1 message)
Mini-Temp (2 messages)
Ministry of Temperaments (Mini-Temp) (1 message)
more "out of tune" recordings (25 messages)
More details (1 message)
motoric allemande (3 messages)
Music on a CD (3 messages)
never mind..... (1 message)
New Froberger edition (1 message)
newly strung string (20 messages)
newly strung string (was Rose) (14 messages)
Nifty CE (1 message)
O'Brien (2 messages)
ok, folks, look closely (3 messages)
old guys (1 message)
old guys (long) (3 messages)
old guys (long)(longer) (2 messages)
Onno Peper & Joan Marti (1 message)
Op art (1 message)
Opera hpschds (17 messages)
other help. was Re: help (1 message)
Paul's rebuttal (1 message)
peripherally h'chord related (1 message)
Portuguese instrument (was Italian harpsichord) (1 message)
prepuce paper (1 message)
Proverb (1 message)
Pulling rank (was Re: creep and stuff. . .) (3 messages)
purity and authenticity (2 messages)
Réf. : Re: 2-harpsichord music (1 message)
Re African Harpsichord Tunings (1 message)
Re Instruments (1 message)
RE Recordings (1 message)
Re Zell recordings (2 messages)
re; junk instruments! (1 message)
Read now; thank me later (5 messages)
Read now; thank me later*********** (2 messages)
Recorders and traditional finishes (7 messages)
recordings (1 message)
red chilies and Marpurg/Kirnberger (1 message)
red chilis (6 messages)
Relive history! (1 message)
retuning for the king (3 messages)
Ride of the Philistines (buppada BA da, buppada BA da!) (2 messages)
Robert Levin on the WTC II (7 messages)
robust design (1 message)
Rose wire question (8 messages)
Roseingrave et al. Was Boehm's F major Suite (2 messages)
Ruckers Timbers (25 messages)
Russell collection (1 message)
Sadness throughout the countryside (3 messages)
sb wood (7 messages)
Scarlatti (1 message)
Scarlatti (was Italian harpsichord) (3 messages)
score changes (2 messages)
Setting La Mancha 1 (1 message)
Sheet Music on CD (17 messages)
Ship of fools OT (1 message)
signing off the h-list (1 message)
small generic instrument design (2 messages)
Smithsonian's termination of lab (2 messages)
snake oil (3 messages)
solution to f# minor temperament "problem" (1 message)
Soundboard Lumber (1 message)
Soundboard Painter (1 message)
Soundboard Painter needed (1 message)
Spanish Harpsichord from Salamonca (4 messages)
Spanish music was Re: tradition (2 messages)
Square piano wound strings (6 messages)
stokowski (1 message)
Suart's reply (1 message)
SUB-MINI-ITALIAN with Voo Doo Decor (1 message)
Synthesising the original, absorbing the aesthetic (1 message)
Teachers (2 messages)
technical drawings of instruments (1 message)
temp catagories (8 messages)
temp categories (5 messages)
temp categories (was temp catagories!) (1 message)
Temperaments for f# (1 message)
thanks, and a little more on Alabama (1 message)
THE DIALOG IS HEATING UP (ON DESIGN) (1 message)
The good, the bad, and the ugly (3 messages)
the notes of Wildboar 9402 (1 message)
The science of musical instrument making (1 message)
Timbral change with tuning (3 messages)
tradition (63 messages)
Tradition:food for thought (1 message)
TRIP TO EUROPE CON'T (2 messages)
Tuners (10 messages)
violin intonation, was: sundry (3 messages)
Voice of the illogical (1 message)
Voice of the Philistines (27 messages)
Voice of the Philistines (was creep and stuff) (1 message)
Voice of the Philistines and Challas (5 messages)
Voice of the Philistines-OT (1 message)
Voices of Philistines et al (4 messages)
website (5 messages)
WEKA report (3 messages)
Why Aske You? (25 messages)
Wittmeyer (1 message)
Z-Book Availability (was Opera hpschds) (2 messages)
Zell - Curtis Goldbergs (3 messages)
Zell - Curtis Goldbergs (canons); J E Dahler (1 message)
Zell recordings (3 messages)
Zuckermann entre (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Most Recent First

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"Cellestini", aka The Space Shuttle

"Cellestini", aka The Space Shuttle

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 20:38:03 +0200

46 lines

New Thread

"out of tune" recordings

"out of tune" recordings

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 15:09:56 +0200

37 lines

New Thread

"The Harpsichord in Brazil".

"The Harpsichord in Brazil".

Calimerio Augusto Soares Netto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 12:56:02 -0300

22 lines

New Thread

"Z" finished kit for sale, 1974

"Z" finished kit for sale, 1974

Stephen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:08:10 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

2-harpsichord music

Re: 2-harpsichord music

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 28 Apr 2001 15:07:47 EDT

12 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2001 11:58:34 +0200

33 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 17:41:39 -0400

25 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Steven Devine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 22:37:08 +0100

33 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Steven Devine <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 22:37:06 +0100

40 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 12:59:24 EDT

34 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 12:32:49 -0400

56 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:06:37 +0200

39 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:55:17 -0400

28 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:46:06 -0500

21 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:44:34 EDT

21 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:42:50 EDT

38 lines

2-harpsichord music

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:34:22 -0400

49 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 01:41:49 -0700

19 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:51:46 +0200

28 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 07:17:08 +0200

47 lines

Re: 2-harpsichord music

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:37:49 EDT

22 lines

2-harpsichord music

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:17:25 -0700

13 lines

New Thread

2-harpsichord music (And Introduction)

Re: 2-harpsichord music (And Introduction)

Ben Carlisle <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:46:40 -0500

73 lines

New Thread

32/Badtrans@MM virus

32/Badtrans@MM virus

William Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 03:49:37 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

4ft hitchpin

Re: 4ft hitchpin

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:13:07 -0400

17 lines

Re: 4ft hitchpin

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 07:49:16 -0700

38 lines

4ft hitchpin

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:09:12 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

4ft hitchpin rail

Re: 4ft hitchpin rail

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:57:53 -0400

29 lines

Re: 4ft hitchpin rail

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:18:58 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 16:32:50 +0200

89 lines

<No subject>

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 21:30:45 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

A note from a new list member

Re: A note from a new list member

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:10:41 -0400

64 lines

A note from a new list member

David Black <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 6 Dec 2000 16:23:28 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

A Request

A Request

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:18:09 EDT

26 lines

New Thread

A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:17:09 -0400

28 lines

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 08:44:25 -0400

20 lines

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 10:47:54 +0200

36 lines

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:28:22 -0400

52 lines

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 19:15:50 -0400

115 lines

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 00:19:40 -0400

126 lines

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 07:57:22 -0400

80 lines

A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

Francis Knights <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:08:03 +0200

66 lines

Re: A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:50:45 -0400

34 lines

A wrong note in Boehm's F major Suite?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 20:33:05 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Administrative - ALL READ

Administrative - ALL READ

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 11:10:12 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

African Harpsichord Trunings

Re: African Harpsichord Trunings

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:26:40 -0500

25 lines

African Harpsichord Trunings

J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 14:29:49 +0200

71 lines

New Thread

African Harpsichord Tunings

African Harpsichord Tunings

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 23:50:48 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

all the thirds sharp

Re: all the thirds sharp

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:20:08 -0700

63 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:04:52 -0500

41 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 11:11:20 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

Angled soundboard grain

Re: Angled soundboard grain

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:27:43 -0600

22 lines

Re: Angled soundboard grain

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:23:19 -0500

27 lines

Re: angled soundboard grain

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:28:55 -0700

32 lines

Re: angled soundboard grain

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:23:06 -0400

47 lines

Re: Angled soundboard grain

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:21:06 -0400

25 lines

Re: Angled soundboard grain

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 09:32:18 -0700

42 lines

angled soundboard grain

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:41:02 -0700

27 lines

Re: Angled soundboard grain

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 22:50:01 -0600

27 lines

Re: Angled soundboard grain

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 16:08:20 -0400

21 lines

Angled soundboard grain

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:57:12 -0400

46 lines

Angled soundboard grain

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:38:23 -0700

46 lines

New Thread

angled soundboards

angled soundboards

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:49:54 +0100

17 lines

New Thread

Arnault Clavicimbalum

Re: Arnault Clavicimbalum

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 15:32:17 -0400

34 lines

Re: Arnault Clavicimbalum

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:54:16 -0400

26 lines

Re: Arnault Clavicimbalum

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:57:37 -0400

32 lines

Arnault Clavicimbalum

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 22:11:32 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

Artie Shaw's harpsichord.

Re: Artie Shaw's harpsichord.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:15:39 -0500

25 lines

Re: Artie Shaw's harpsichord.

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:10:15 -0500

22 lines

Re: Artie Shaw's harpsichord.

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 19:13:45 -0400

19 lines

Re: Artie Shaw's harpsichord.

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:05:12 +0100

20 lines

Re: Artie Shaw's harpsichord.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 15:21:41 -0600

19 lines

Artie Shaw's harpsichord.

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:41:23 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

Bach toccata 910 / Buxtehude's organ tuning f#-minor BuxWV 146

Bach toccata 910 / Buxtehude's organ tuning f#-minor BuxWV 146

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:58:01 +0200

98 lines

New Thread

Bach's Harpsichord

Re: Bach's Harpsichord

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2001 22:59:41 -0400

34 lines

Bach's harpsichord

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:40:33 -0400

20 lines

New Thread

Bachs f#-toccata BWV 910 transposition?

Re: Bachs f#-toccata BWV 910 transposition?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 08:58:22 +0200

87 lines

Bachs f#-toccata BWV 910 transposition?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:26:40 +0200

55 lines

New Thread

Bad teachers, was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Re: Bad teachers, was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 18:25:05 -0500

40 lines

Re: Bad teachers, was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 18:18:28 -0400

63 lines

Re: Bad teachers, was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 16:51:43 -0500

24 lines

Re: Bad teachers, was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 15:23:30 -0600

19 lines

Bad teachers, was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 16:24:55 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Baldwin hpschd

Re: Baldwin hpschd

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:14:31 -0600

120 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 09:44:43 +0100

114 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:19:54 -0400

91 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 14:07:02 +0100

57 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:47:28 -0400

39 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:12:44 -0400

38 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:03:59 -0600

61 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 16:03:55 +0100

54 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:05:46 -0600

40 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 10:32:15 +0100

26 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:18:19 -0500

53 lines

Re: Baldwin hpschd

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:15:38 -0600

14 lines

New Thread

Baldwin hpschd, sound and micing

Re: Baldwin hpschd, sound and micing

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 14:39:49 -0400

37 lines

New Thread

Barbour's tables

Barbour's tables

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:27:34 -0400

40 lines

New Thread

Baroque Rite of Spring; triplet gigues and movement order and such

Re: Baroque Rite of Spring; triplet gigues and movement order and such

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:40:07 -0400

48 lines

Re: Baroque Rite of Spring; triplet gigues and movement order and such

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 20:12:12 -0400

42 lines

Re: Baroque Rite of Spring; triplet gigues and movement order and such

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 11:26:06 -0400

69 lines

Baroque Rite of Spring; triplet gigues and movement order and such

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 10:56:10 -0400

156 lines

New Thread

beginning of French Suite 6

Re: beginning of French Suite 6

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 12:31:27 -0400

24 lines

Re: beginning of French Suite 6

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 12:17:48 -0400

33 lines

beginning of French Suite 6

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 10:58:54 -0400

49 lines

New Thread

bemf hpsch recitals

bemf hpsch recitals

Marina Werbeloff <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:13:28 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Bizzi's harpsichords

Re: Bizzi's harpsichords

Martha N. Folts <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 13:27:30 -0400

22 lines

Re: Bizzi's harpsichords

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:19:06 -0700

20 lines

Re: Bizzi's harpsichords

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:43:57 -0400

20 lines

Re: Bizzi's harpsichords

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 16:22:54 EDT

23 lines

Bizzi's harpsichords

laurent benoit <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 21:27:44 GMT+1

23 lines

Bizzi's harpsichords

Laurent Benoit <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:20:21 -0400

9 lines

New Thread

Bohm suite #7

Re: Bohm suite #7

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 18:06:56 -0400

21 lines

Re: Bohm suite #7

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 12:59:18 +0200

38 lines

Re: Bohm suite #7

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 06:41:39 -0400

19 lines

Re: Bohm suite #7

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 01:14:33 EDT

30 lines

Bohm suite #7

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 23:42:20 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Brandenburg surprises (was: Stokowski)

Brandenburg surprises (was: Stokowski)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 16:24:46 EDT

16 lines

New Thread

Buxtehude recordings

Re: Buxtehude recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 15:58:21 -0400

39 lines

Buxtehude recordings

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 11:53:10 -0700

22 lines

New Thread

BWV 1050 - Stokowski and Landowska

BWV 1050 - Stokowski and Landowska

Wanda Landowska KotF <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 07:54:50 EDT

52 lines

New Thread

Bye Bye!

Re: Bye Bye!

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:38:47 -0400

24 lines

Bye Bye!

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 01:04:11 -0400

11 lines

New Thread

Caleb Warner

Caleb Warner

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 21:40:07 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

CDs available

Re: CDs available

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 23:28:46 -0400

48 lines

CDs available

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:55:36 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

Challis

Re: Challis

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 21:34:01 -0400

32 lines

Challis

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 20:26:59 -0400

47 lines

Re: Challis

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:47:43 +0200

36 lines

Re: Challis

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:40:55 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

Challis harpsichords (was: Philistines)

Challis harpsichords (was: Philistines)

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:39:18 EDT

16 lines

New Thread

Cheap Harpsichords

Re: Cheap Harpsichords

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 08:00:50 -0400

45 lines

Cheap Harpsichords

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:51:30 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Choosing Instruments.

Re: Choosing Instruments.

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:58:46 -0400

55 lines

New Thread

Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:33:57 -0500

35 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:07:16 -0500

43 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:12:24 -0400

30 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:46:54 -0600

21 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 17:55:58 -0400

23 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:03:22 +0200

44 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:34:53 -0700

80 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 20:28:31 +0100

64 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 19:20:22 +0100

24 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:21:53 +0200

36 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 07:58:38 -0700

66 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 07:21:06 -0700

42 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Melissa & Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:10:00 -0700

82 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 23:26:05 -0600

52 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 17:39:33 -0700

141 lines

Re: Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 20:35:05 -0400

17 lines

Choosing Teachers / Instruments.

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 00:31:09 +0100

69 lines

New Thread

Church and State

Re: Church and State

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:36:08 -0400

31 lines

Re: Church and State

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:19:03 +0100

45 lines

Church and State

Julia Harlow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:29:47 -0200

27 lines

New Thread

co-incidences

Re: co-incidences

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:02:43 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

Computer software platforms.

Re: Computer software platforms.

Ernest Miller <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 22:32:46 -0400

15 lines

Re: Computer software platforms.

Melissa & Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:51:57 -0700

49 lines

Re: Computer software platforms.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:40:32 -0700

38 lines

Re: Computer software platforms.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 20:19:25 -0400

19 lines

Re: Computer software platforms.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 16:29:20 -0700

71 lines

Re: Computer software platforms.

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:10:27 -0400

54 lines

New Thread

Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:57:37 -0400

20 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 11:39:16 -0700

37 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:17:25 -0400

37 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 14:09:28 -0400

22 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 19:03:12 -0700

43 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:51:35 +0200

27 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:11:42 -0700

37 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 15:46:33 +0200

26 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 04:13:27 -0400

52 lines

Re: Computer software platforms. Was: Why Aske You?

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 04:03:09 -0400

45 lines

New Thread

Concert announcement

Concert announcement

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:13:13 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

Concert in NYC

Concert in NYC

Bruce Garetz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 11:09:04 -0400

74 lines

New Thread

Copyright of facsimiles /publication projet

Copyright of facsimiles /publication projet

Cyparis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 22:03:47 +0100

44 lines

New Thread

Copyright of facsimiles in the USA

Re: Copyright of facsimiles in the USA

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:48:21 -0500

22 lines

Re: Copyright of facsimiles in the USA

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 12:08:16 -0500

80 lines

Copyright of facsimiles in the USA

Wanda Landowska KotF <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 21:21:26 EDT

50 lines

New Thread

Copyright of facsimiles in the USA (2)

Re: Copyright of facsimiles in the USA (2)

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 22:43:02 +0100

69 lines

Copyright of facsimiles in the USA (2)

Wanda Landowska KotF <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 07:46:18 EDT

45 lines

New Thread

Couchet1680- Blanchet1758- Taskin1781 SB painting removal MFA instrument

Couchet1680- Blanchet1758- Taskin1781 SB painting removal MFA instrument

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:16:55 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

counterpoint and hard work [was Re: tradition]

counterpoint and hard work [was Re: tradition]

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 09:00:25 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

creep and stuff

Re: creep and stuff

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 23:57:42 EDT

55 lines

Re: creep and stuff

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 23:36:48 EDT

30 lines

Re: creep and stuff

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:50:01 -0500

15 lines

Re: creep and stuff

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:34:32 +0200

37 lines

Re: creep and stuff

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:02:35 -0400

32 lines

Re: creep and stuff

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:03:50 EDT

30 lines

Re: creep and stuff

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:02:43 -0500

21 lines

Re: creep and stuff

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 23:27:44 +0200

52 lines

Re: creep and stuff

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 18:26:50 -0600

54 lines

Re: creep and stuff

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 10:16:04 -0700

15 lines

creep and stuff

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 03:01:37 EDT

301 lines

New Thread

creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation

Re: creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 07:57:00 -0400

16 lines

Re: creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:56:46 EDT

116 lines

Re: creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:11:56 -0400

37 lines

Re: creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 00:00:06 -0400

37 lines

Re: creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 21:42:10 -0600

25 lines

Re: creep and stuff or metallurgical masturbation

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 23:05:56 -0400

93 lines

New Thread

creep and stuff, or metallurgical enlightenment

Re: creep and stuff, or metallurgical enlightenment

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 13:08:24 -0600

51 lines

Re: creep and stuff, or metallurgical enlightenment

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 15:40:45 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

critics

critics

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:31:43 -0700

28 lines

New Thread

cryogenic hardening

Re: cryogenic hardening

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 23:18:18 -0500

29 lines

cryogenic hardening

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 21:28:15 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

David Cates recital (tongue in cheek, mostly)

David Cates recital (tongue in cheek, mostly)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:33:06 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Decent instruments

Re: Decent instruments

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:57:57 EDT

44 lines

Re: Decent instruments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 15:16:15 -0600

24 lines

Re: Decent instruments

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 14:46:23 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Different (harps.) strokes for different folks

Re: Different (harps.) strokes for different folks

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:01:09 -0500

20 lines

Re: Different (harps.) strokes for different folks

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:21:56 -0400

64 lines

Re: Different (harps.) strokes for different folks

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:31:21 -0400

36 lines

Re: Different (harps.) strokes for different folks

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:14:16 -0400

33 lines

Different (harps.) strokes for different folks

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:23:20 EDT

34 lines

New Thread

DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes

Re: DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2001 06:29:20 -0700

29 lines

Re: DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 23:25:56 EDT

17 lines

Re: DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes

Gerald T Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 21:58:59 -0500

41 lines

Re: DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 18:38:26 -0700

33 lines

Re: DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 20:04:49 EDT

15 lines

DRAWINGS soon to be AVAILABLE:Harpsich,Clavi, Epinettes

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 14:47:25 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

E-bay instrument

E-bay instrument

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 15:32:30 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

e-mail address request

Re: e-mail address request

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 19:55:37 -0600

16 lines

New Thread

Easley Blackwood book

Easley Blackwood book

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:58:23 -0400

27 lines

New Thread

Edith Picht-Axenfeld

Re: Edith Picht-Axenfeld

Wanda Landowska KotF <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:04:54 EDT

41 lines

Edith Picht-Axenfeld

J.Marc Reichow <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 22:52:11 +0200

17 lines

New Thread

English harpsichord

Re: English harpsichord

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:11:14 -0400

45 lines

Re: English harpsichord

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 21:19:57 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

English Harpsichord; was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Re: English Harpsichord; was junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:10:32 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Entre to Zuckermann needed

Re: Entre to Zuckermann needed

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:13:34 -0400

42 lines

Re: Entre to Zuckermann needed

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 11:53:20 -0700

67 lines

Re: Entre to Zuckermann needed

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 10:44:52 EDT

39 lines

Entre to Zuckermann needed

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 01:50:34 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Euro-USD-transposition

Re: Euro-USD-transposition

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:53:27 -0400

17 lines

Re: Euro-USD-transposition

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:52:11 +0100

44 lines

Re: Euro-USD-transposition

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 15:31:18 +0200

24 lines

Euro-USD-transposition

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 09:59:33 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

f minor Toccata BWV 910 (was Italian harpsichord)

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910 (was Italian harpsichord)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:52:30 -0400

52 lines

f minor Toccata BWV 910 (was Italian harpsichord)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 12:09:16 -0400

72 lines

New Thread

f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 15:39:37 EDT

20 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:55:13 -0500

29 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Ray Ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 23:27:53 -0500

22 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:20:03 -0400

24 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:41:49 -0400

41 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 19:00:38 EDT

22 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:23:20 -0400

32 lines

f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 18:09:13 -0400

40 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 17:53:14 -0400

23 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:56:17 -0400

32 lines

Re: f minor Toccata BWV 910, aka Baroque Rite of Spring

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 16:19:35 -0400

28 lines

New Thread

F# minor

Re: F# minor

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 08:09:08 +0100

16 lines

Re: F# minor

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:06:47 -0700

22 lines

Re: f# minor

Luis Villalba <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:35:58 -0300

69 lines

Re: f# minor

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 10:49:33 +0200

114 lines

Re: f# minor

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:29:43 -0700

123 lines

f# minor

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 17:23:19 +0200

126 lines

Re: f# minor

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 07:29:30 -0700

32 lines

Re: f# minor

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 09:50:42 -0400

52 lines

Re: f# minor

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:35:19 +0200

31 lines

Re: f# minor

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:03:35 -0500

55 lines

Re: f# minor

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:24:23 -0700

45 lines

f# minor

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:56:52 +0200

120 lines

New Thread

f# minor and Paul's objections

f# minor and Paul's objections

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 10:49:06 -0400

85 lines

New Thread

f# minor and Paul's objections (fwd)

Re: f# minor and Paul's objections (fwd)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:21:11 -0400

18 lines

Re: f# minor and Paul's objections (fwd)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 01:39:48 -0400

69 lines

Re: f# minor and Paul's objections (fwd)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 00:35:39 EDT

164 lines

New Thread

fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:39:01 -0400

53 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 15:06:05 -0500

51 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:42:45 +0100

31 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 22:40:53 -0400

36 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 22:27:02 -0400

58 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 20:44:00 -0400

49 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Ben Dupre <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 23:14:41 +0100

60 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 22:28:59 +0100

44 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:30:00 -0500

42 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 17:23:43 -0500

53 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 08:45:14 -0400

39 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 09:53:36 +0200

23 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 23:25:04 EDT

40 lines

Re: fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:55:33 -0500

25 lines

fascimile copyright (was Why Aske..)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 17:53:14 EDT

35 lines

New Thread

Finale vs. Sibelius

Finale vs. Sibelius

Bruce Behnke <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 22:05:03 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

fir abies alba

Re: fir abies alba

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 20:36:40 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

fis-moll

Re: fis-moll

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:22:23 -0400

35 lines

Re: fis-moll

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:53:08 -0400

53 lines

Re: fis-moll

PAUL G. MASSER <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 16:37:37 -0400

23 lines

fis-moll

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:20:15 -0400

108 lines

New Thread

folk harpsichord

Re: folk harpsichord

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:23:06 -0600

36 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:01:49 -0500

29 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

Melissa & Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:34:18 -0700

21 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:56:07 -0600

13 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:45:48 -0600

31 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 12:47:34 -0400

37 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 09:48:34 -0600

46 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 08:55:13 -0400

34 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 21:16:10 -0400

28 lines

Re: folk harpsichord

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:08:20 -0600

16 lines

New Thread

Four Foot Hitchpin Rail

Four Foot Hitchpin Rail

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 11:27:56 +0200

32 lines

Re: Four Foot Hitchpin Rail

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 06:42:14 -0700

47 lines

Four Foot Hitchpin Rail

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 07:15:03 EDT

16 lines

New Thread

free music on line

Re: free music on line

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 12:18:34 -0600

15 lines

New Thread

French double fatigue (was: Italian harpsichord)

French double fatigue (was: Italian harpsichord)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:35:51 EDT

41 lines

New Thread

Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections

Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 17:23:12 -0700

29 lines

Re: Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 13:42:02 -0400

17 lines

Re: Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:09:57 +0200

30 lines

Re: Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections

Etienne Alatienne <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 17:27:33 -0700

49 lines

Re: Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 18:44:27 -0400

68 lines

Froberger discography - seeking additions/corrections

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:00:09 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Froberger discography 2nd draft

Re: Froberger discography 2nd draft

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 13:03:51 +0200

48 lines

Froberger discography 2nd draft

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:33:18 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

Re: Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

Jim Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 07:28:28 -0700

37 lines

Re: Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 09:58:27 +0200

48 lines

Re: Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 09:16:34 +0200

42 lines

Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 01:24:21 -0400

42 lines

Re: Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 09:47:25 -0700

38 lines

Re: Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 16:21:17 +0200

39 lines

Froberger Strasbourg Manuscript

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 09:35:48 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Fw: Curator position

Fw: Curator position

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 13:24:48 -0400

73 lines

New Thread

FW: Ozark Engineering Test

Re: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:14:51 -0600

137 lines

Re: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:57:58 -0400

129 lines

Re: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:00:02 -0500

24 lines

Re: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 15:02:49 -0400

141 lines

Re: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:29:16 -0600

117 lines

Re: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:47:35 -0400

99 lines

New Thread

FW:Re:hpschds in 50s pop

FW:Re:hpschds in 50s pop

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 08:11:54 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Fwd: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

Fwd: FW: Ozark Engineering Test

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 10:01:22 -0600

87 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Z-Book Availability (was Opera hpschds)

Fwd: Re: Z-Book Availability (was Opera hpschds)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:32:49 -0600

55 lines

New Thread

f[is]-moll, summary

Re: f[is]-moll, summary

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 10:37:54 -0400

39 lines

Re: f[is]-moll, summary

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 11:17:54 +0200

96 lines

Re: f[is]-moll, summary

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 08:49:15 +0100

18 lines

f[is]-moll, summary

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 23:11:34 -0400

260 lines

New Thread

Game shows - OT

Game shows - OT

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 22:55:17 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

Germanic Revivals other than in charming Santa Fe

Germanic Revivals other than in charming Santa Fe

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 11:45:38 -0700

79 lines

New Thread

goodbye reconstruction? Silbermann Frauenkirche Dresden

goodbye reconstruction? Silbermann Frauenkirche Dresden

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 08:37:30 +0200

51 lines

New Thread

grain direction in Italian

Re: grain direction in Italian

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 23:15:23 -0600

21 lines

Re: grain direction in Italian

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 21:15:20 -0700

28 lines

Re: grain direction in Italian

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 08:59:20 -0700

45 lines

Re: grain direction in Italian

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 22:01:24 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord Covers

Harpsichord Covers

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 02:22:50 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord sites in Italy

Re: Harpsichord sites in Italy

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:12:48 -0700

62 lines

Re: Harpsichord sites in Italy

Ruth Ungar <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:03:21 -0700

46 lines

Re: Harpsichord sites in Italy

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 11:26:55 -0400

40 lines

Harpsichord sites in Italy

Julie A Zimmerman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 09:50:31 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

HARPSICHORD WOODS

Re: HARPSICHORD WOODS

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 20:51:40 -0600

31 lines

HARPSICHORD WOODS

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:06:11 -0700

53 lines

New Thread

Haydn Seven Last Words

Re: Haydn Seven Last Words

Luis Villalba <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:43:05 -0300

42 lines

Haydn Seven Last Words

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:06:27 +0200

25 lines

New Thread

Hellendaal

Re: Hellendaal

Viviana Sofronitzki <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:40:28 +0200

17 lines

Re: Hellendaal

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:08:22 -0500

28 lines

Hellendaal

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:33:18 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

help

Re: help

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:16:12 -0400

31 lines

Re: help

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 15:02:29 +0100

66 lines

Re: help

Gregg Feigelson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 08:22:22 -0400

45 lines

help

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 09:07:07 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Help for Judith: Acis and Galatea

Re: Help for Judith: Acis and Galatea

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:24:11 -0400

52 lines

Help for Judith: Acis and Galatea

Philip Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:26:41 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

HEM-FIR

Re: HEM-FIR

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:55:48 -0600

53 lines

Re: HEM-FIR

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 14:59:42 -0700

70 lines

Re: HEM-FIR

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 15:02:50 -0600

39 lines

New Thread

hemfir

Re: hemfir

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:14:50 -0700

26 lines

Re: hemfir

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:53:30 -0600

37 lines

Re: hemfir

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 07:58:48 -0400

30 lines

hemfir

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 07:27:40 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

hpschd marketing basics was junk instruments

Re: hpschd marketing basics was junk instruments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:18:30 -0600

15 lines

Re: hpschd marketing basics was junk instruments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:10:48 -0600

11 lines

Re: hpschd marketing basics was junk instruments

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:55:59 -0600

74 lines

New Thread

hpschd science and engineering (again)

Re: hpschd science and engineering (again)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 23:51:02 +0200

19 lines

hpschd science and engineering (again)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 08:14:08 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 13 Apr 2001 to 14 Apr 2001 (#2001-119)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 13 Apr 2001 to 14 Apr 2001 (#2001-119)

Chris Wainwright <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 19:03:40 +0930

11 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Apr 2001 to 20 Apr 2001 (#2001-127)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Apr 2001 to 20 Apr 2001 (#2001-127)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 09:33:48 -0500

25 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 19 Apr 2001 to 20 Apr 2001 (#2001-127)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 21 Apr 2001 15:07:09 -0700

36 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 2 Apr 2001 to 3 Apr 2001 (#2001-101)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 2 Apr 2001 to 3 Apr 2001 (#2001-101)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:18:46 -0700

33 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 2 Apr 2001 to 3 Apr 2001 (#2001-101)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:34:50 -0700

72 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 23 Apr 2001 to 24 Apr 2001 (#2001-131)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 23 Apr 2001 to 24 Apr 2001 (#2001-131)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 13:47:20 -0700

66 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 01:39:19 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

hpschds in 50s pop

Re: hpschds in 50s pop

Gordon Collins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:26:44 -0400

32 lines

hpschds in 50s pop

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:00:09 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

idea

Re: idea

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:30:34 EDT

31 lines

Re: idea

Rob Potter <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 17:55:11 +0930

34 lines

Re: idea

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 08:52:25 +0200

39 lines

idea

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:55:43 -0700

42 lines

New Thread

Import Duties on Harpsichords to USA

Import Duties on Harpsichords to USA

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:27:01 -0400

13 lines

New Thread

In Durham, NC? (also somewhat off topic)

Re: In Durham, NC? (also somewhat off topic)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:14:37 EDT

24 lines

New Thread

In Paris? (off topic)

Re: In Paris? (off topic)

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 14:24:19 -0400

16 lines

In Paris? (off topic)

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 07:43:16 -0400

24 lines

New Thread

inauthentic? (was Jack's trip)

inauthentic? (was Jack's trip)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 01:00:55 EDT

55 lines

New Thread

Inharmonicity (for the 10,000th time)

Inharmonicity (for the 10,000th time)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:39:01 +0200

157 lines

New Thread

inharmonicity again

Re: inharmonicity again

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 07:54:55 -0600

36 lines

Re: inharmonicity again

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 08:29:32 -0400

46 lines

Re: inharmonicity again

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 23:37:12 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

Interesting Relic on Ebay

Re: Interesting Relic on Ebay

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 22:54:37 -0400

27 lines

Interesting Relic on Ebay

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 19 Apr 2001 21:56:22 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

Intonation - report from another planet

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:12:12 -0500

30 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:23:47 -0600

70 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 11:36:08 +0200

102 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 10:02:07 +0200

33 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:35:06 -0500

69 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 15:23:53 -0500

37 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:23:00 -0500

35 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:27:33 -0600

23 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 13:25:13 -0500

112 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:30:57 -0700

38 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:08:20 +0200

115 lines

New Thread

Italian harpsichord

Re: Italian harpsichord

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 20:12:05 -0400

18 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 23 Apr 2001 14:26:33 -0700

27 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 06:04:12 -0400

31 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

PAUL G. MASSER <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:09:34 -0400

27 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:02:34 +0200

21 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

PAUL G. MASSER <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:43:37 -0400

18 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:11:22 EDT

31 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:00:30 -0500

19 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 09:30:37 -0700

47 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 06:29:36 +0100

33 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 19:21:00 -0500

29 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:14:23 +0200

21 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:10:59 -0700

71 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 19:28:40 +0200

27 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 07:42:15 -0700

49 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:23:44 EDT

22 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:51:53 -0700

44 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:16:33 EDT

18 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 08:54:49 -0400

29 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 08:19:16 -0400

33 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 03:03:49 -0400

42 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 02:18:14 EDT

20 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 07:08:45 +0100

27 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 23:49:02 -0600

26 lines

Re: Italian harpsichord

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:24:19 EDT

26 lines

Italian harpsichord

dave-jane johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 22:26:16 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Italian keyboards

Re: Italian keyboards

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 22 Apr 2001 21:51:36 -0400

16 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 22:01:13 -0700

11 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:34:20 -0400

21 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:28:57 -0400

35 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 11:07:25 -0700

15 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

Jim Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:43:38 -0700

34 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:23:20 -0700

23 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:10:52 -0400

25 lines

Re: Italian keyboards

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:02:05 EDT

22 lines

Italian keyboards

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 09:46:07 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Italian keyboards, sb wood

Re: Italian keyboards, sb wood

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:13:49 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

James R Anthony (forwarded message)

James R Anthony (forwarded message)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 16:47:47 -0400

43 lines

New Thread

Japan happenings

Japan happenings

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 16:38:17 +1000

88 lines

New Thread

Jorgensen et al

Re: Jorgensen et al

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 14:12:24 -0700

43 lines

Re: Jorgensen et al

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:46:02 EDT

26 lines

Re: Jorgensen et al

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:33:40 -0700

83 lines

Re: Jorgensen et al

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 15:27:09 -0400

46 lines

Re: Jorgensen et al

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:00:03 -0400

32 lines

Re: Jorgensen et al

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 13:21:40 -0400

42 lines

Jorgensen et al

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 11:37:49 -0400

52 lines

New Thread

junk instruments

junk instruments

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 05:43:51 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:17:51 +0100

56 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:04:11 -0700

58 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:11:50 -0400

44 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:45:10 -0500

25 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 10:27:26 -0700

32 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 13:04:57 -0500

49 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:16:17 -0400

45 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:08:50 -0400

18 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 08:39:44 -0400

37 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 00:24:47 -0400

25 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 20:32:52 -0600

43 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:59:54 EDT

25 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 18:23:02 -0700

32 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 21:01:27 -0400

17 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 17:55:49 -0700

33 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 20:50:35 -0400

20 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 20:39:55 -0400

32 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 17:41:00 -0700

22 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 20:28:19 -0400

24 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James Hunsley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 13:51:35 -0500

24 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:30:24 -0700

115 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 11:04:48 -0600

25 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:44:43 -0400

38 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 15:36:41 +0100

55 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:23:42 -0600

24 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:20:41 -0600

35 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 08:44:06 -0400

18 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:56:52 +0100

69 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 12:51:32 +0100

26 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:20:43 +0200

33 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:23:18 +0200

27 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 09:14:29 +0200

22 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 18:34:41 -0400

148 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 18:06:19 -0500

135 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 18:00:57 -0500

56 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 23:56:00 +0200

50 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 17:25:14 -0400

67 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 22:00:27 +0100

48 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 12:16:35 -0600

50 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 13:00:51 EDT

24 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 09:56:54 -0700

21 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 10:46:13 -0600

50 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 09:37:12 -0700

48 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 09:26:17 -0700

33 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Jenny Rowland <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 17:24:21 +0100

56 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 12:13:10 -0400

15 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 11:08:53 -0400

118 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 10:12:40 -0400

43 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 07:36:54 -0400

27 lines

junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 22:59:19 -0400

38 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:45:34 -0400

85 lines

Re: junk instruments, was Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:51:26 -0600

60 lines

New Thread

K.G. recital

Re: K.G. recital

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 18:27:46 -0400

25 lines

Re: K.G. recital

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:45:01 -0400

19 lines

K.G. recital

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:03:47 -0400

44 lines

New Thread

Korg OT-12

Re: Korg OT-12

Douglas Cutler <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 12:09:59 -0400

26 lines

Re: Korg OT-12

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:51:14 -0600

22 lines

Korg OT-12

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:29:58 +0200

47 lines

New Thread

Korh MT1200

Re: Korh MT1200

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 08:25:19 +0200

22 lines

Re: Korh MT1200

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 19:49:22 -0500

20 lines

Re: Korh MT1200

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:50:04 -0400

26 lines

Re: Korh MT1200

Alex Karahalios <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:39:11 -0700

30 lines

Re: Korh MT1200

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:15:41 EDT

13 lines

Re: Korh MT1200

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 12:10:05 -0600

15 lines

New Thread

La Mancha 1 (Neidhardt 1)

La Mancha 1 (Neidhardt 1)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:24:26 -0400

280 lines

New Thread

La Mancha 1 (Neidhardt 1) analysis, better layout

Re: La Mancha 1 (Neidhardt 1) analysis, better layout

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 23:44:28 -0400

29 lines

New Thread

language arrogance and brevity

language arrogance and brevity

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:44:07 +0200

45 lines

Re: language arrogance and brevity

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 23:42:20 +0200

32 lines

Re: language arrogance and brevity

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 14:06:37 -0700

79 lines

Re: language arrogance and brevity

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 16:53:59 -0400

43 lines

Re: language arrogance and brevity

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:27:27 +0200

35 lines

Re: language arrogance and brevity

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 13:37:42 -0400

21 lines

language arrogance and brevity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 10:28:38 -0600

14 lines

New Thread

language arrogance: theory vs. reality

language arrogance: theory vs. reality

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 18:25:27 +0200

77 lines

New Thread

language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyw...

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyw...

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 19:31:25 +0200

24 lines

New Thread

language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 10:02:39 -0600

34 lines

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:58:10 -0600

29 lines

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 09:49:28 -0600

40 lines

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:12:03 +0200

53 lines

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:24:18 +0200

130 lines

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:29:39 -0700

23 lines

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic, but perhaps interesting anyway)

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 00:51:05 -0700

78 lines

New Thread

language brevity (now completely off-topic,but perhaps interesting anyway)

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic,but perhaps interesting anyway)

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 18 Apr 2001 00:09:55 +0200

37 lines

Re: language brevity (now completely off-topic,but perhaps interesting anyway)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:25:28 -0700

44 lines

New Thread

Levin's clavichord in WTC II

Levin's clavichord in WTC II

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 08:53:15 -0400

25 lines

New Thread

Lindley on Bach (was f#)

Lindley on Bach (was f#)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 16:11:04 +0200

144 lines

New Thread

luteharp

Re: luteharp

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 19:52:08 -0700

36 lines

Re: luteharp

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 01:05:51 EDT

20 lines

Re: luteharp

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:54:28 -0400

29 lines

Re: luteharp

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:45:32 -0600

29 lines

Re: luteharp

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:29:21 EDT

23 lines

Re: luteharp

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:15:23 EDT

40 lines

Re: luteharp

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:40:35 -0400

23 lines

Re: luteharp

Gerald T Ortman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:44:44 -0500

32 lines

Re: luteharp

Jim Morrison <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:51:52 -0700

48 lines

Re: luteharp

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:57:58 -0400

24 lines

Re: luteharp

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 16:52:49 -0500

27 lines

Re: luteharp

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 14:32:14 -0600

15 lines

New Thread

Marpurg v Kirnberger on the mat, redux

Marpurg v Kirnberger on the mat, redux

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 00:06:56 -0400

47 lines

New Thread

Mini-Temp

Re: Mini-Temp

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:32:07 -0400

41 lines

Mini-Temp

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 14:19:31 +0200

32 lines

New Thread

Ministry of Temperaments (Mini-Temp)

Ministry of Temperaments (Mini-Temp)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 10:19:13 +0200

89 lines

New Thread

more "out of tune" recordings

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 13:39:03 +0200

37 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:49:45 +0200

21 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 03:21:26 EDT

21 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:07:38 +0200

23 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 22:19:04 -0600

27 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 22:11:43 -0400

46 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Etienne Alatienne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 14:55:16 -0700

28 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 21:53:22 +0200

24 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 15:54:26 -0400

26 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 12:46:44 -0700

38 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 21:09:16 +0200

35 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 15:26:09 -0400

61 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Etienne Alatienne <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 10:53:09 -0700

40 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 07:54:46 -0400

19 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 08:53:01 +0200

30 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:13:48 -0400

33 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:36:57 -0500

30 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:23:00 -0700

24 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:30:35 -0400

61 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 00:08:25 +0200

36 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 23:57:58 +0200

30 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Etienne Alatienne <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:16:00 -0700

23 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:02:03 -0700

68 lines

Re: more "out of tune" recordings

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:46:17 +0200

31 lines

more "out of tune" recordings

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 11:31:25 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

More details

More details

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 21:50:10 -0600

9 lines

New Thread

motoric allemande

Re: motoric allemande

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 09:55:03 -0400

37 lines

Re: motoric allemande

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 08:35:05 -0400

20 lines

motoric allemande

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 23:49:52 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

Music on a CD

Re: Music on a CD

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 17:17:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: Music on a CD

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 07:49:42 -0400

50 lines

Music on a CD

Bruce Behnke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:52:27 -0700

18 lines

New Thread

never mind.....

never mind.....

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 12:35:33 +0100

71 lines

New Thread

New Froberger edition

New Froberger edition

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 22:55:38 +0200

53 lines

New Thread

newly strung string

Re: newly strung string

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:26:32 -0500

22 lines

Re: newly strung string

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 18:46:52 +0200

22 lines

Re: newly strung string

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 12:03:31 -0400

19 lines

Re: newly strung string

Frank House <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 06:48:25 +0100

69 lines

Re: newly strung string

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:45:34 +0200

27 lines

Re: newly strung string

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 21:09:59 -0400

37 lines

Re: newly strung string

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 19:35:22 -0400

35 lines

Re: newly strung string

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:44:34 -0400

34 lines

Re: newly strung string

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 18:31:33 -0400

25 lines

Re: newly strung string

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:52:48 -0600

45 lines

Re: newly strung string

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 12:37:28 -0600

91 lines

Re: newly strung string

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 08:40:29 +0200

83 lines

Re: newly strung string

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 17:42:36 -0600

61 lines

Re: newly strung string

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:10:19 +0200

23 lines

Re: newly strung string

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:15:27 -0600

41 lines

Re: newly strung string

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 08:54:26 +0200

73 lines

Re: newly strung string

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 22:45:56 -0400

51 lines

Re: newly strung string

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 17:34:09 -0400

35 lines

Re: newly strung string

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 13:15:46 -0700

24 lines

newly strung string

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 15:51:08 EDT

95 lines

New Thread

newly strung string (was Rose)

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:23:29 -0700

93 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 23:01:54 +0200

82 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 09:01:02 -0500

22 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 07:10:34 +0100

39 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 12 Apr 2001 07:47:19 +0100

54 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 16:00:37 EDT

31 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:56:19 -0700

35 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:53:03 -0700

27 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:35:11 -0400

35 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:04:26 EDT

32 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:04:53 -0600

42 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 18:37:43 +0100

56 lines

Re: newly strung string (was Rose)

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 08:50:48 -0700

70 lines

newly strung string (was Rose)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 11:35:37 EDT

36 lines

New Thread

Nifty CE

Nifty CE

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 21:30:30 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

O'Brien

Re: O'Brien

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 22:51:30 +0200

32 lines

Re: O'Brien

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 14:08:28 -0600

34 lines

New Thread

ok, folks, look closely

Re: ok, folks, look closely

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:56:30 -0400

22 lines

Re: ok, folks, look closely

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:32:50 -0700

30 lines

ok, folks, look closely

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:15:00 -0400

15 lines

New Thread

old guys

Re: old guys

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 15 Apr 2001 20:09:19 -0600

47 lines

New Thread

old guys (long)

Re: old guys (long)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 20:00:32 -0500

30 lines

Re: old guys (long)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 15:54:06 -0600

111 lines

Re: old guys (long)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 12:15:53 -0500

104 lines

New Thread

old guys (long)(longer)

Re: old guys (long)(longer)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 20:28:21 -0500

27 lines

Re: old guys (long)(longer)

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 08:16:00 -0700

92 lines

New Thread

Onno Peper & Joan Marti

Onno Peper & Joan Marti

Leonard Houston <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 21:35:02 -0400

18 lines

New Thread

Op art

Op art

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 25 Apr 2001 08:57:11 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Opera hpschds

Re: Opera hpschds

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 8 Apr 2001 11:54:44 -0700

38 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 17:53:00 -0500

25 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 16:23:34 -0400

58 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 14:58:15 EDT

39 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 14:28:13 -0400

108 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:13:28 -0700

42 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 12:06:56 -0600

21 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 10:52:11 -0700

86 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 11:34:03 -0600

45 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 19:13:10 -0500

30 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:27:42 EDT

21 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 22:56:45 -0400

68 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 21:21:14 -0400

25 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 19:44:33 -0500

31 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

George Debono <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 01:21:06 +0200

34 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 19:10:29 -0400

36 lines

Re: Opera hpschds

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 14:42:55 -0600

21 lines

New Thread

other help. was Re: help

other help. was Re: help

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 10:53:15 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

Paul's rebuttal

Paul's rebuttal

Bradley P Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:22:26 -0400

120 lines

New Thread

peripherally h'chord related

peripherally h'chord related

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 20:23:56 -0400

30 lines

New Thread

Portuguese instrument (was Italian harpsichord)

Portuguese instrument (was Italian harpsichord)

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:04:41 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

prepuce paper

Re: prepuce paper

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:21:23 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

Proverb

Proverb

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 08:43:35 -0700

14 lines

New Thread

Pulling rank (was Re: creep and stuff. . .)

Re: Pulling rank (was Re: creep and stuff. . .)

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:48:59 -0400

35 lines

Re: Pulling rank (was Re: creep and stuff. . .)

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 01:48:12 -0400

33 lines

Pulling rank (was Re: creep and stuff. . .)

Benjamin E Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 00:51:49 -0400

23 lines

New Thread

purity and authenticity

Re: purity and authenticity

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 12:52:16 -0400

24 lines

Re: purity and authenticity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 08:58:41 -0600

149 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Re: 2-harpsichord music

Réf. : Re: 2-harpsichord music

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 16:40:04 +0200

10 lines

New Thread

Re African Harpsichord Tunings

Re African Harpsichord Tunings

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 23:33:28 -0400

41 lines

New Thread

Re Instruments

Re Instruments

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 9 Apr 2001 22:10:00 +0200

15 lines

New Thread

RE Recordings

RE Recordings

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 27 Apr 2001 10:44:01 -0400

14 lines

New Thread

Re Zell recordings

Re: Re Zell recordings

Jeroen Heijungs <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 10:32:35 +0200

21 lines

Re Zell recordings

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:55:13 +0200

30 lines

New Thread

re; junk instruments!

re; junk instruments!

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:44:20 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Read now; thank me later

Re: Read now; thank me later

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 14 Apr 2001 08:37:48 +0200

37 lines

Re: Read now; thank me later

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 23:01:49 -0700

18 lines

Re: Read now; thank me later

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 14:52:07 -0500

23 lines

Re: Read now; thank me later

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 12:40:12 EDT

18 lines

Read now; thank me later

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 21:44:54 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Read now; thank me later***********

Re: Read now; thank me later***********

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 13 Apr 2001 22:27:42 -0700

14 lines

Re: Read now; thank me later***********

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 09:54:22 -0700

35 lines

New Thread

Recorders and traditional finishes

Re: Recorders and traditional finishes

Hal L Haney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 06:27:53 -0600

14 lines

Re: Recorders and traditional finishes

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 16:07:37 EDT

12 lines

Re: Recorders and traditional finishes

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 15:32:24 -0400

34 lines

Re: Recorders and traditional finishes

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 14:53:33 -0400

28 lines

Re: Recorders and traditional finishes

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 13:37:23 -0400

34 lines

Re: Recorders and traditional finishes

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 30 Apr 2001 06:57:00 -0700

55 lines

Recorders and traditional finishes

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 29 Apr 2001 17:01:05 -0700

65 lines

New Thread

recordings

recordings

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 26 Apr 2001 19:08:21 -0400

35 lines

New Thread

red chilies and Marpurg/Kirnberger

red chilies and Marpurg/Kirnberger

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 14:01:42 -0400

38 lines

New Thread

red chilis

Re: red chilis

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 12:24:54 -0600

59 lines

Re: red chilis

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:32:02 -0700

41 lines

Re: red chilis

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 10:28:27 -0600

31 lines

Re: red chilis

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 08:24:32 -0500

22 lines

Re: red chilis

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 07:34:02 -0500

33 lines

Re: red chilis

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 1 Apr 2001 03:38:57 -0400

17 lines

New Thread

Relive history!

Relive history!

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 24 Apr 2001 20:38:04 -0400

19 lines

New Thread

retuning for the king

Re: retuning for the king

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:18:13 -0700

45 lines

Re: retuning for the king

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 19:41:23 -0400

38 lines

Re: retuning for the king

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 2 Apr 2001 13:13:56 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

Ride of the Philistines (buppada BA da, buppada BA da!)

Re: Ride of the Philistines (buppada BA da, buppada BA da!)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 16:07:48 -0400

68 lines

Ride of the Philistines (buppada BA da, buppada BA da!)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 17 Apr 2001 15:50:45 -0400

69 lines

New Thread

Robert Levin on the WTC II

Re: Robert Levin on the WTC II

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 7 Apr 2001 09:57:21 -0400

20 lines

Re: Robert Levin on the WTC II

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 6 Apr 2001 20:36:57 +0100

16 lines

Re: Robert Levin on the WTC II

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 20:17:32 -0400

105 lines

Re: Robert Levin on the WTC II

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 13:27:48 -0400

25 lines

Re: Robert Levin on the WTC II

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:57:01 -0400

27 lines

Re: Robert Levin on the WTC II

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 18:11:34 +0200

26 lines

Robert Levin on the WTC II

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:01:03 -0400

51 lines

New Thread

robust design

Re: robust design

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 16 Apr 2001 09:41:25 -0600

12 lines

New Thread

Rose wire question

Re: Rose wire question

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 07:31:26 +0100

28 lines

Re: Rose wire question

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 07:25:55 +0100

40 lines

Re: Rose wire question

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 11 Apr 2001 06:14:09 +0100

13 lines

Re: Rose wire question

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 19:17:50 -0400

22 lines

Re: Rose wire question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:59:34 -0700

38 lines

Re: Rose wire question

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 18:55:14 -0400

22 lines

Re: Rose wire question

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 15:46:40 -0700

40 lines

Rose wire question

Timothy S. Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 10 Apr 2001 17:02:35 -0400

21 lines

New Thread

Roseingrave et al. Was Boehm's F major Suite

Re: Roseingrave et al. Was Boehm's F major Suite

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 12:01:15 -0400

37 lines

Roseingrave et al. Was Boehm's F major Suite

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 20 Apr 2001 17:13:34 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Ruckers Timbers

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 5 Apr 2001 12:30:24 +0100

26 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 10:48:49 -0700

43 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 08:04:12 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Conrad Hoffsommer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 07:46:52 -0500

34 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 08:31:37 -0400

22 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 08:17:21 -0400

40 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 01:42:59 EDT

21 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 4 Apr 2001 00:27:43 -0400

30 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 20:46:32 -0700

25 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 21:33:41 -0400

26 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 17:41:56 -0600

28 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 22:33:51 +0100

32 lines

Re: Ruckers Timbers

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 3 Apr 2001 14:23:27 -0700

61 lines