LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


March 2001


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

"annoying" PP, was Re: Inharmonicity? (5 messages)
"annoying..." (18 messages)
*** off topic (1 message)
22 notes to an octave (14 messages)
22 notes to an octave (fwd) (1 message)
>"All your base are belong to us" (1 message)
A Couple of Soundboard Questions (3 messages)
A stitch in time saves a bird in the bush (2 messages)
A word about Werckmeister (was: Translations) (1 message)
address needed (2 messages)
all the thirds sharp (17 messages)
Anthony Goble (4 messages)
appropriate tempi (9 messages)
Arnault and geometry (Jack's questions) (3 messages)
Arnaut de Zwolle (2 messages)
Bach and ET, was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune? (2 messages)
Bach and ET,was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune? (3 messages)
Bach Inventions edition (2 messages)
Bach sinfonias in ordinaire (4 messages)
Bach's Toccata in f# minor belongs in F MINOR (3 messages)
Bandsaw goldmine (1 message)
bandsaw springs (11 messages)
Bartok on harpsichord (was Specialization) (3 messages)
Be there or be square (1 message)
big is better? (10 messages)
big, and loud, and ... (2 messages)
Blandine Verlet, etc. (1 message)
Books about wire and scaling (2 messages)
CDs & records for sale (1 message)
chopping commas (1 message)
concert announcement (2 messages)
Concert rage (1 message)
connections (4 messages)
Corrette temperaments 1753 (1 message)
crystal flute (2 messages)
D'Anglebert question (1 message)
David Cates Recital (1 message)
DEATH OF HUGH BOYLE (1 message)
Derek Porteus (1 message)
Early music tour in July to Burgundy (1 message)
early pianos (19 messages)
Ed-u-kai-shun (as in "We don' need no . . . ") (1 message)
Education and the Harpsichord Maker (1 message)
Education for Harpsichord Builders (8 messages)
Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members (54 messages)
Episode III Notes on latest trip (1 message)
Festival Baroque d'Auvergne (1 message)
Festival Baroque d'Auvergne. Was Réf. : Staging (1 message)
festival in Thoiry (1 message)
filtering (4 messages)
filters (1 message)
firewall (2 messages)
Florida... also, critters (1 message)
Fw: music for guitar and hpschd (1 message)
Fwd: Re: Epistle to the Gen-Xers (1 message)
Gerrit Klop (4 messages)
Godfrey piano (2 messages)
Good news in Violet (1 message)
Gould and Scarlatti (4 messages)
happy day: Quantz back in print (1 message)
Harpsichord maker's philosophy, was: We? Oui? or wee-wee? (1 message)
Hi, was re something insulting (2 messages)
historical wire (1 message)
hpschd science and engineering (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94) (5 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-95) (5 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Mar 2001 (#2001-96) (1 message)
I give up, I'm selling the ottavino (2 messages)
inharmonic sounds (1 message)
inharmonicity (43 messages)
inharmonicity? (3 messages)
innovation (7 messages)
innovation / show tunes (5 messages)
innovation / show tunes / crystal flute (2 messages)
Intonation - report from another planet (4 messages)
jitters (2 messages)
jitters... also, Florida (3 messages)
Johann Lorenz Bach-slightly OT (1 message)
John Barnes (formerly Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue) (1 message)
Joseph's final thought #42 (was hpscd-l digest etc.) (1 message)
JSB (2 messages)
Julian Rhodes (1 message)
Just Got Here (2 messages)
Katin Schubert (1 message)
KHFM rage (1 message)
Knives (was Re: We? etc.) (1 message)
Laurent Stewart (5 messages)
Laurent Stewart Marchand CD (1 message)
Laurent Stewart? (5 messages)
Laurent Stewart? / Apologies (1 message)
limitations of technology (1 message)
loud (1 message)
Lurch (3 messages)
Lurch's theme song (1 message)
Matthias Weckmann keyboard music (3 messages)
more Bach in meantone-flavored temperaments (3 messages)
More on my Europe trip (part II) (1 message)
Mozart, was Re: Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE (2 messages)
music for guitar and hpschd (1 message)
My first performance in public (1 message)
My harpsichord photo (3 messages)
My latest educational trip to Europe (4 messages)
My nitemare about the Redsell virginal (2 messages)
new email address (1 message)
News from the Third World (4 messages)
Nicks Harpsichords (1 message)
No subject was specified. (1 message)
Odd-ball titles (2 messages)
Odd-ball titles, was: ebay auction (3 messages)
Of Mice and Men (8 messages)
OOPS (1 message)
Oops - sorry (1 message)
Paris (2 messages)
Patelson's website (1 message)
Potential latin motto! (6 messages)
PureTone strings (2 messages)
Réf. : Re: wire research (1 message)
Réf. : Staging (4 messages)
radio and MP3 and things (1 message)
Re-examination of Henri Arnault de Zwolle (3 messages)
red chilis (1 message)
Registration (11 messages)
restoration Gaveau 1939 harpsichord Copenhagen Cathedral (1 message)
scaling (15 messages)
SEHKS event (4 messages)
SEHKS event this week (3 messages)
Sophie Yates (4 messages)
Soundboard and humidity control (4 messages)
Source of finished wood products?**** (1 message)
Speaking of flutes. . . (4 messages)
Specialization (4 messages)
Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members] (2 messages)
Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders- HPSCHD-L members] (4 messages)
Staging (7 messages)
Stembridge & Sevskaya (1 message)
stirred & shaken : Corrette (1 message)
stirred and shaken (6 messages)
sundry (2 messages)
tall and short (9 messages)
Tannenberg (3 messages)
Tannenberg organ at Madison VA (2 messages)
TANNENBERG TEMPERAMENT and CLAVICHORD flute] (1 message)
Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes / crystal flute] (3 messages)
Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes /crystal flute] (1 message)
Temperament myths (1 message)
temperaments (1 message)
Temperaments and singing (1 message)
Tension (5 messages)
the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's (10 messages)
The good, the bad, and the ugly (18 messages)
THE NEW, NEW AND OLD NEW GROVE (1 message)
these "ordinaire" temps (4 messages)
Translations (off-topic) (22 messages)
transposition in Bach's f# minor toccata (1 message)
Verlet Bach toccata recording pitches (1 message)
Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune? (29 messages)
Verlet samples on French Amazon (4 messages)
Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone (4 messages)
Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen (6 messages)
Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book "Violet" (1 message)
Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain (1 message)
Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE (2 messages)
virginal (3 messages)
viruses (1 message)
We? Oui? or wee-wee (1 message)
We? Oui? or wee-wee? (22 messages)
web update (1 message)
Werckmeister 1707 (7 messages)
whatever (4 messages)
Whereabouts of Philip Tyre (1 message)
wire history (54 messages)
wire research (33 messages)
wire stuff (1 message)
wire theory (2 messages)
[Cambridge, MA] Keyboard Player(s) Wanted for Baroque Group (fwd) (1 message)
[Fwd: Situation Vacant at The Stockholm Music Museum] (1 message)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

"annoying" PP, was Re: Inharmonicity?

"annoying" PP, was Re: Inharmonicity?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 09:27:36 -0500

57 lines

Re: "annoying" PP, was Re: Inharmonicity?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:03:11 +0100

74 lines

Re: "annoying" PP, was Re: Inharmonicity?

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 14:48:48 -0500

51 lines

Re: "annoying" PP, was Re: Inharmonicity?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:09:54 +0100

26 lines

Re: "annoying" PP, was Re: Inharmonicity?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 23:12:37 -0800

47 lines

New Thread

"annoying..."

Re: "annoying..."

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 16:59:48 -0800

39 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 23:34:30 -0500

68 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 20:53:50 -0800

78 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 02:46:42 EST

26 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 08:50:38 +0100

63 lines

Re: "annoying..."

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 10:30:41 -0500

57 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 08:24:47 -0800

46 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 12:46:38 -0500

29 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:28:21 +0200

146 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 14:48:49 -0500

36 lines

Re: "annoying..."

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:12:52 -0500

26 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:30:32 +0200

21 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:01:24 -0600

25 lines

Re: "annoying..."

William Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:04:22 -0500

27 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:07:11 +0200

30 lines

Re: "annoying..."

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:06:38 +0100

18 lines

Re: "annoying..."

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:17:58 -0800

49 lines

Re: "annoying..."

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:01:43 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

*** off topic

*** off topic

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:43:22 -0500

37 lines

New Thread

22 notes to an octave

22 notes to an octave

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 17:19:15 -0500

20 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:13:51 -0500

19 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 23:41:59 -0500

31 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:53:19 +0100

47 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:39:07 -0500

22 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:27:09 -0500

35 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:34:07 +0100

36 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:02:26 -0500

30 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:37:22 -0500

24 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:44:31 -0500

18 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:55:07 -0500

31 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:16:21 -0500

39 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:15:27 -0800

23 lines

Re: 22 notes to an octave

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 15:28:29 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

22 notes to an octave (fwd)

Re: 22 notes to an octave (fwd)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:26:29 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

>"All your base are belong to us"

Re: >"All your base are belong to us"

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:04:39 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

A Couple of Soundboard Questions

A Couple of Soundboard Questions

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 12:16:50 EST

32 lines

Re: A Couple of Soundboard Questions

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:20:42 -0500

51 lines

Re: A Couple of Soundboard Questions

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:55:21 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

A stitch in time saves a bird in the bush

A stitch in time saves a bird in the bush

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:06:50 -0800

17 lines

Re: A stitch in time saves a bird in the bush

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:03:44 -0700

24 lines

New Thread

A word about Werckmeister (was: Translations)

A word about Werckmeister (was: Translations)

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:07:41 EST

24 lines

New Thread

address needed

address needed

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:53:52 -0800

16 lines

Re: address needed

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:32:52 +0100

10 lines

New Thread

all the thirds sharp

all the thirds sharp

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:02:47 -0500

54 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:07:02 -0800

86 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 23:09:34 -0500

43 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:03:02 EST

23 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 07:58:12 -0800

48 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:40:50 EST

22 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:34:23 -0700

15 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:55:31 -0800

32 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:12:55 -0700

19 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:46:58 -0800

28 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:43:01 +0200

25 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:28:40 -0800

52 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:41:27 -0700

25 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:30:46 -0700

15 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:08:24 -0700

15 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:50:36 +0100

31 lines

Re: all the thirds sharp

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:47:49 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

Anthony Goble

Anthony Goble

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:56:53 -0000

20 lines

Re: Anthony Goble

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 08:52:05 -0500

20 lines

Re: Anthony Goble

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 10:46:29 -0500

40 lines

Anthony Goble

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 12:31:49 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

appropriate tempi

Re: appropriate tempi

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:58:14 -0700

20 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:03:44 EST

31 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 16:04:59 EST

32 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:37:22 EST

18 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:32:20 -0700

22 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 20:00:40 -0600

34 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 01:54:53 EST

25 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:57:09 -0500

25 lines

Re: appropriate tempi

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:09:13 -0800

34 lines

New Thread

Arnault and geometry (Jack's questions)

Arnault and geometry (Jack's questions)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:17:37 EST

137 lines

Re: Arnault and geometry (Jack's questions)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:53:17 +0200

33 lines

Re: Arnault and geometry (Jack's questions)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:41:11 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Arnaut de Zwolle

Arnaut de Zwolle

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:36:03 EST

106 lines

Re: Arnaut de Zwolle

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:49:06 +0100

16 lines

New Thread

Bach and ET, was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Re: Bach and ET, was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:12:14 +0100

52 lines

Re: Bach and ET, was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:23:05 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

Bach and ET,was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Re: Bach and ET,was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:30:48 -0500

86 lines

Re: Bach and ET,was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:14:01 -0500

67 lines

Re: Bach and ET,was Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:09:25 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

Bach Inventions edition

Bach Inventions edition

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 19:27:13 +0100

22 lines

Re: Bach Inventions edition

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 13:37:51 EST

20 lines

New Thread

Bach sinfonias in ordinaire

Bach sinfonias in ordinaire

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 00:36:36 -0500

50 lines

Re: Bach sinfonias in ordinaire

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:14:17 +0200

28 lines

Re: Bach sinfonias in ordinaire

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:02:32 +0200

26 lines

Re: Bach sinfonias in ordinaire

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:15:18 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

Bach's Toccata in f# minor belongs in F MINOR

Bach's Toccata in f# minor belongs in F MINOR

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:34:45 -0500

78 lines

Re: Bach's Toccata in f# minor belongs in F MINOR

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:43:51 -0500

68 lines

Re: Bach's Toccata in f# minor belongs in F MINOR

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 22:17:57 +0200

23 lines

New Thread

Bandsaw goldmine

Re: Bandsaw goldmine

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 12:51:05 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

bandsaw springs

Re: bandsaw springs

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:20:40 -0700

15 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:36:08 -0500

27 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:41:59 -0500

24 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:53:24 -0800

39 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:09:14 -0800

41 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Al Clark <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:46:14 EST

14 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:03:15 -0600

19 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:14:25 -0600

23 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:27:24 +0200

31 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 02:31:27 EST

28 lines

Re: bandsaw springs

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:53:43 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

Bartok on harpsichord (was Specialization)

Bartok on harpsichord (was Specialization)

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:44:09 -0500

44 lines

Re: Bartok on harpsichord (was Specialization)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:12:35 -0500

31 lines

Re: Bartok on harpsichord (was Specialization)

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:00:55 +0200

50 lines

New Thread

Be there or be square

Be there or be square

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:42:31 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

big is better?

big is better?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:53:57 +0100

69 lines

big is better?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:13:03 +0100

26 lines

Re: big is better?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 18:34:17 -0500

36 lines

Re: big is better?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:28:41 +0100

26 lines

Re: big is better?

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 12:13:26 +0000

58 lines

Re: big is better?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:31:42 -0500

92 lines

Re: big is better?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 10:51:06 -0500

23 lines

Re: big is better?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 21:05:21 +0100

24 lines

Re: big is better?

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:59:01 -0800

30 lines

Re: big is better?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:34:14 +0200

41 lines

New Thread

big, and loud, and ...

big, and loud, and ...

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:52:18 -0800

50 lines

Re: big, and loud, and ...

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:02:17 -0700

37 lines

New Thread

Blandine Verlet, etc.

Re: Blandine Verlet, etc.

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:05:05 -0800

51 lines

New Thread

Books about wire and scaling

Books about wire and scaling

Nico Koolsbergen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:20:53 +0100

22 lines

Re: Books about wire and scaling

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 08:49:10 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

CDs & records for sale

CDs & records for sale

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:00:43 -0600

116 lines

New Thread

chopping commas

chopping commas

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:45:27 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

concert announcement

concert announcement

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 18:01:18 -0800

26 lines

Re: concert announcement

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 08:57:28 EST

12 lines

New Thread

Concert rage

Re: Concert rage

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:48:34 -0700

13 lines

New Thread

connections

Re: connections

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:18:21 -0700

69 lines

Re: connections

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 13:04:10 -0500

92 lines

Re: connections

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 22:44:49 -0000

44 lines

Re: connections

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 20:43:15 -0500

58 lines

New Thread

Corrette temperaments 1753

Corrette temperaments 1753

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:40:50 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

crystal flute

crystal flute

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:27:53 -0500

47 lines

Re: crystal flute

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:47:41 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

D'Anglebert question

D'Anglebert question

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:43:03 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

David Cates Recital

David Cates Recital

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:27:02 -0600

24 lines

New Thread

DEATH OF HUGH BOYLE

Re: DEATH OF HUGH BOYLE

Hal L Haney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 07:45:49 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

Derek Porteus

Derek Porteus

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:23:43 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

Early music tour in July to Burgundy

Early music tour in July to Burgundy

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2001 13:09:27 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

early pianos

Re: early pianos

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:32:30 -0500

26 lines

Re: early pianos

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:39:08 -0500

38 lines

Re: early pianos

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:03:56 +0200

33 lines

Re: early pianos

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:34:38 +0100

40 lines

Re: early pianos

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:49:42 +0100

25 lines

Re: early pianos

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:25:21 -0500

48 lines

Re: early pianos

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:48:13 -0500

24 lines

Re: early pianos

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:51:51 -0500

39 lines

Re: early pianos

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:33:57 -0500

36 lines

Re: early pianos

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 07:46:19 -0800

37 lines

Re: early pianos

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:06:10 -0500

33 lines

Re: early pianos

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:25:43 -0500

37 lines

Re: early pianos

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:48:36 +0200

24 lines

Re: early pianos

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:59:29 -0800

41 lines

Re: early pianos

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:53:14 EST

34 lines

Re: early pianos

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:59:57 -0500

82 lines

Re: early pianos

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:51:44 +0200

75 lines

Re: early pianos

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:42:37 +0100

59 lines

Re: early pianos

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:22:17 EST

30 lines

New Thread

Ed-u-kai-shun (as in "We don' need no . . . ")

Ed-u-kai-shun (as in "We don' need no . . . ")

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:04:25 +0200

35 lines

New Thread

Education and the Harpsichord Maker

Education and the Harpsichord Maker

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:26:19 -0800

60 lines

New Thread

Education for Harpsichord Builders

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:02:38 -0500

47 lines

Education for Harpsichord Builders

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:45:42 +0200

33 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:07:49 -0500

57 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:48:43 -0500

34 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:16:27 -0500

41 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:43:33 +0200

38 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:17:32 +0200

67 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:17:11 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:20:03 -0500

14 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:32:25 -0800

49 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 21:26:15 -0500

29 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 19:39:11 -0700

23 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:25:53 -0500

21 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:37:08 -0500

54 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 23:44:13 -0500

52 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:32:02 -0500

40 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 07:51:01 -0500

50 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:29:46 -0500

39 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:53:22 -0500

64 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 06:54:16 -0800

91 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:43:46 -0700

66 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:23:28 -0700

70 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:39:31 -0700

20 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:04:01 -0700

14 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:26:32 -0500

21 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:37:20 -0800

17 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:08:13 -0500

29 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:56:33 +0200

18 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:13:37 +0100

58 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

George Debono <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 01:01:47 +0200

42 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:38:42 -0800

29 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Cipolla, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:14:18 -0500

61 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Cipolla, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:25:28 -0500

18 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:47:37 -0700

37 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 07:49:36 +0100

50 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:12:25 -0700

19 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 00:18:27 -0700

17 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:54:21 +0100

33 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 06:47:11 -0500

20 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:27:57 +0200

28 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:28:50 -0700

58 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

George Debono <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:46:56 +0200

29 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:51:34 -0500

32 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 18:59:04 -0500

43 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:30:02 -0500

18 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:06:01 -0700

21 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:18:25 -0600

40 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:28:16 +0100

23 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Dr White <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:14:38 +0100

28 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 07:53:25 -0800

47 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:25:04 -0800

68 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:16:24 -0500

47 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:16:58 -0700

52 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:29:11 -0700

35 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:42:28 -0500

45 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:43:25 -0700

26 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

LLOYDSRUS <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:53:44 -0600

49 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 07:20:52 +0100

21 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Dr White <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:31:21 +0100

13 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 08:42:13 -0800

29 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:09:48 -0600

39 lines

Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:13:08 -0700

19 lines

New Thread

Episode III Notes on latest trip

Episode III Notes on latest trip

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:26:28 -0800

94 lines

New Thread

Festival Baroque d'Auvergne

Re: Festival Baroque d'Auvergne

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 06:51:29 -0800

63 lines

New Thread

Festival Baroque d'Auvergne. Was Réf. : Staging

Festival Baroque d'Auvergne. Was Réf. : Staging

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:49:16 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

festival in Thoiry

festival in Thoiry

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 09:24:27 +0100

27 lines

New Thread

filtering

Re: filtering

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:14:43 -0700

17 lines

Re: filtering

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:03:43 -0600

14 lines

Re: filtering

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:40:02 -0700

28 lines

Re: filtering

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:44:32 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

filters

Re: filters

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:46:07 -0700

15 lines

New Thread

firewall

Re: firewall

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 21:38:31 -0700

38 lines

Re: firewall

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 22:01:42 -0700

21 lines

New Thread

Florida... also, critters

Re: Florida... also, critters

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:29:06 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Fw: music for guitar and hpschd

Fw: music for guitar and hpschd

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 11:47:43 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Re: Epistle to the Gen-Xers

Fwd: Re: Epistle to the Gen-Xers

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:08:52 -0700

58 lines

New Thread

Gerrit Klop

Gerrit Klop

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 13:18:09 EST

14 lines

Re: Gerrit Klop

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 15:00:09 -0500

21 lines

Re: Gerrit Klop

Chris Vandekerkhove <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 06:54:22 -0800

36 lines

Re: Gerrit Klop

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:29:59 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Godfrey piano

Godfrey piano

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 10:34:58 -0500

25 lines

Re: Godfrey piano

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 11:29:48 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

Good news in Violet

Good news in Violet

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 12:46:55 -0800

23 lines

New Thread

Gould and Scarlatti

Re: Gould and Scarlatti

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:26:42 -0700

24 lines

Re: Gould and Scarlatti

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 14:20:30 -0500

40 lines

Re: Gould and Scarlatti

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:14:55 -0700

39 lines

Re: Gould and Scarlatti

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:32:33 EST

18 lines

New Thread

happy day: Quantz back in print

happy day: Quantz back in print

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:04:58 -0500

50 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord maker's philosophy, was: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Harpsichord maker's philosophy, was: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:04:42 -0000

48 lines

New Thread

Hi, was re something insulting

Hi, was re something insulting

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:38:42 -0500

30 lines

Re: Hi, was re something insulting

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 11:20:17 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

historical wire

Re: historical wire

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:05:41 -0700

41 lines

New Thread

hpschd science and engineering

Re: hpschd science and engineering

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:22:02 -0700

30 lines

Re: hpschd science and engineering

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:42:16 +0000

43 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:10:06 -0800

20 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:23:30 -0800

41 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:28:41 -0800

23 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:52:14 -0500

55 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-94)

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:15:19 +0200

29 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-95)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-95)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 16:38:47 -0800

49 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-95)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:00:07 -0800

41 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-95)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:05:23 -0800

20 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-95)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:07:43 -0800

18 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Mar 2001 to 30 Mar 2001 - Special issue (#2001-95)

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 20:02:07 -0700

67 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Mar 2001 (#2001-96)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Mar 2001 (#2001-96)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:32:52 -0800

52 lines

New Thread

I give up, I'm selling the ottavino

I give up, I'm selling the ottavino

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 22:55:35 -0800

21 lines

Re: I give up, I'm selling the ottavino

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:26:06 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

inharmonic sounds

inharmonic sounds

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:25:51 +0200

40 lines

New Thread

inharmonicity

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:37:19 -0700

94 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:39:09 -0700

29 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 21:38:48 -0700

37 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:03:12 -0700

31 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 22:09:19 -0700

16 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:48:50 +0100

160 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:24:17 +0000

43 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 12:28:18 +0000

52 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:47:34 +0100

41 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 09:15:57 -0600

23 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:30:00 +0000

58 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:41:54 -0700

19 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:44:11 -0700

20 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 08:49:02 -0700

37 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 07:56:15 -0800

48 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 16:07:15 +0000

63 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 14:04:45 -0500

37 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 19:01:03 -0600

20 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:56:13 +0100

91 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:57:19 +0100

30 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:47:03 +0000

70 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 07:17:32 -0800

44 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 11:54:44 -0700

58 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:01:14 -0700

32 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:20:30 -0500

30 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 12:00:48 -0800

28 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:10:25 -0700

38 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:16:50 -0700

13 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 14:19:12 -0700

15 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:57:58 +0100

109 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 09:36:24 +0000

38 lines

Re: inharmonicity

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 08:03:44 -0700

26 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 07:19:03 -0800

46 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:09:08 -0500

34 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:44:12 -0500

37 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:39:46 -0500

26 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:57:51 -0500

20 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:57:49 -0800

25 lines

Re: inharmonicity

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:28:17 -0500

28 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 22:18:38 +0100

70 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 21:44:38 +0100

42 lines

Re: inharmonicity

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:50:52 -0500

18 lines

Re: inharmonicity

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 17:17:17 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

inharmonicity?

inharmonicity?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 19:34:33 +0100

17 lines

Re: inharmonicity?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 14:32:08 -0500

32 lines

Inharmonicity?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:44:19 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

innovation

innovation

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 22:38:44 -0500

31 lines

Re: innovation

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 20:48:52 -0800

27 lines

Re: innovation

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:44:03 -0800

23 lines

Re: innovation

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:18:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: innovation

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:37:58 -0700

18 lines

Re: innovation

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:40:53 -0800

33 lines

Re: innovation

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 07:10:39 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

innovation / show tunes

innovation / show tunes

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:16:58 -0500

85 lines

Re: innovation / show tunes

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 12:26:11 -0500

53 lines

Re: innovation / show tunes

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:35:59 -0700

30 lines

Re: innovation / show tunes

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 13:22:23 -0500

32 lines

Re: innovation / show tunes

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 20:22:09 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

innovation / show tunes / crystal flute

innovation / show tunes / crystal flute

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:03:46 -0500

122 lines

Re: innovation / show tunes / crystal flute

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:16:53 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Intonation - report from another planet

Intonation - report from another planet

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 18:54:17 +0200

160 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

Hinrich Muller <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:26:45 -0800

23 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 19:40:01 +0200

33 lines

Re: Intonation - report from another planet

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 13:05:38 -0500

67 lines

New Thread

jitters

jitters

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 22:09:35 -0500

15 lines

Re: jitters

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 10:51:48 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

jitters... also, Florida

Re: jitters... also, Florida

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 19:18:00 -0800

34 lines

Re: jitters... also, Florida

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 23:49:43 -0500

29 lines

Re: jitters... also, Florida

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:50:52 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Johann Lorenz Bach-slightly OT

Johann Lorenz Bach-slightly OT

David J. Campbell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 07:54:57 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

John Barnes (formerly Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue)

Re: John Barnes (formerly Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue)

Henson Markham <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 11:42:42 EST

28 lines

New Thread

Joseph's final thought #42 (was hpscd-l digest etc.)

Joseph's final thought #42 (was hpscd-l digest etc.)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 23:40:29 EST

36 lines

New Thread

JSB

JSB

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 16:12:50 -0000

30 lines

Re: JSB

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 11:32:34 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Julian Rhodes

Julian Rhodes

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 21 Mar 2001 10:13:20 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

Just Got Here

Just Got Here

William Bartlett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 01:12:58 -0500

32 lines

Re: Just Got Here

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 08:39:09 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Katin Schubert

Re: Katin Schubert

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:16:08 -0600

33 lines

New Thread

KHFM rage

Re: KHFM rage

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 13:24:46 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Knives (was Re: We? etc.)

Knives (was Re: We? etc.)

Valdemar <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:49:46 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

Laurent Stewart

Laurent Stewart

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 10:11:46 -0600

22 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 09:59:03 -0800

81 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:17:17 -0800

50 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 16:17:00 -0800

22 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart

Robert Tifft <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 19:52:00 -0600

37 lines

New Thread

Laurent Stewart Marchand CD

Re: Laurent Stewart Marchand CD

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 14:34:10 -0800

45 lines

New Thread

Laurent Stewart?

Laurent Stewart?

Larry Katz <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:42:50 -0600

17 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 08:27:26 -0500

27 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart?

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 09:51:40 -0800

41 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart?

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 14:25:37 -0500

56 lines

Re: Laurent Stewart?

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:12:48 -0800

74 lines

New Thread

Laurent Stewart? / Apologies

Re: Laurent Stewart? / Apologies

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 10:18:38 -0800

10 lines

New Thread

limitations of technology

limitations of technology

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:28:02 +0200

58 lines

New Thread

loud

Re: loud

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:17:01 -0700

29 lines

New Thread

Lurch

Lurch

rayv <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 11:20:48 -0800

18 lines

Re: Lurch

Valdemar <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 16:34:27 -0500

21 lines

Re: Lurch

rayv <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 13:24:39 -0800

29 lines

New Thread

Lurch's theme song

Lurch's theme song

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:32:08 -0500

33 lines

New Thread

Matthias Weckmann keyboard music

Matthias Weckmann keyboard music

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2001 15:42:15 -0500

15 lines

Re: Matthias Weckmann keyboard music

Joe Metzinger <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2001 21:21:14 EST

19 lines

Re: Matthias Weckmann keyboard music

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2001 18:33:10 -0800

27 lines

New Thread

more Bach in meantone-flavored temperaments

more Bach in meantone-flavored temperaments

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:47:35 -0500

45 lines

Re: more Bach in meantone-flavored temperaments

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 21:42:54 -0500

39 lines

Re: more Bach in meantone-flavored temperaments

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:11:59 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

More on my Europe trip (part II)

More on my Europe trip (part II)

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 10:01:40 -0800

94 lines

New Thread

Mozart, was Re: Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE

Mozart, was Re: Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 16:02:03 -0500

25 lines

Re: Mozart, was Re: Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 17:04:22 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

music for guitar and hpschd

music for guitar and hpschd

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 18:35:04 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

My first performance in public

My first performance in public

Yann Morin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:46:20 +0200

21 lines

New Thread

My harpsichord photo

My harpsichord photo

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:12:50 -0500

19 lines

Re: My harpsichord photo

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:28:16 -0700

22 lines

Re: My harpsichord photo

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:24:09 -0500

54 lines

New Thread

My latest educational trip to Europe

My latest educational trip to Europe

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 18:55:21 -0800

44 lines

Re: My latest educational trip to Europe

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:39:54 -0500

59 lines

Re: My latest educational trip to Europe

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 21:42:21 -0700

21 lines

Re: My latest educational trip to Europe

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:44:00 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

My nitemare about the Redsell virginal

My nitemare about the Redsell virginal

Vincent Ho <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:32:00 -0800

40 lines

Re: My nitemare about the Redsell virginal

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:41:43 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

new email address

Re: new email address

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 10:52:53 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

News from the Third World

Re: News from the Third World

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:43:57 -0700

52 lines

Re: News from the Third World

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 11:47:19 -0700

40 lines

Re: News from the Third World

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 18:44:41 -0500

15 lines

Re: News from the Third World

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 20:07:43 -0700

20 lines

New Thread

Nicks Harpsichords

Nicks Harpsichords

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:27:13 -0500

15 lines

New Thread

No subject was specified.

No subject was specified.

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 15:33:36 -0800

20 lines

New Thread

Odd-ball titles

Re: Odd-ball titles

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 02:01:36 -0500

22 lines

Re: Odd-ball titles

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 08:59:21 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

Odd-ball titles, was: ebay auction

Re: Odd-ball titles, was: ebay auction

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 21:30:03 EST

27 lines

Re: Odd-ball titles, was: ebay auction

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 00:24:53 -0500

37 lines

Re: Odd-ball titles, was: ebay auction

Martha N. Folts <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 3 Mar 2001 21:23:18 -0500

44 lines

New Thread

Of Mice and Men

Of Mice and Men

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 10:43:10 +0200

27 lines

Re: Of Mice and Men

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:48:25 -0500

31 lines

Re: Of Mice and Men

PAUL G. MASSER <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:01:44 -0500

37 lines

Re: Of Mice and Men

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:07:54 +0100

117 lines

Re: Of Mice and Men

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:13:46 -0500

42 lines

Re: Of Mice and Men

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:38:44 -0500

26 lines

Re: Of Mice and Men

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:47:06 +0100

31 lines

Re: Of Mice and Men

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:05:12 +0100

59 lines

New Thread

OOPS

OOPS

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:31:10 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

Oops - sorry

Oops - sorry

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:25:57 +0200

54 lines

New Thread

Paris

Paris

Bob Morgan <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 23:40:32 -0500

23 lines

Re: Paris

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 22:23:02 -0800

44 lines

New Thread

Patelson's website

Patelson's website

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 9 Mar 2001 01:54:03 -0500

11 lines

New Thread

Potential latin motto!

Potential latin motto!

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:26:30 -0500

22 lines

Re: Potential latin motto!

Cipolla, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 15:55:51 -0500

42 lines

Re: Potential latin motto!

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 16:11:41 -0500

27 lines

Re: Potential latin motto!

Cipolla, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 16:04:15 -0500

42 lines

Re: Potential latin motto!

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 17:48:31 -0500

44 lines

Re: Potential latin motto!

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 2 Mar 2001 12:31:04 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

PureTone strings

PureTone strings

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:23:56 EST

52 lines

Re: PureTone strings

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:09:07 -0700

23 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Re: wire research

Réf. : Re: wire research

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:28:06 +0100

12 lines

New Thread

Réf. : Staging

Réf. : Staging

Fidele Zelechowski <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:51:06 +0100

15 lines

Re: Réf. : Staging

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 08:37:58 -0500

47 lines

Re: Réf. : Staging

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:12:32 EST

17 lines

Re: Réf. : Staging

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:16:04 EST

17 lines

New Thread

radio and MP3 and things

radio and MP3 and things

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:09:31 -0800

48 lines

New Thread

Re-examination of Henri Arnault de Zwolle

Re-examination of Henri Arnault de Zwolle

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:17:29 -0800

68 lines

Re: Re-examination of Henri Arnault de Zwolle

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:32:23 -0800

21 lines

Re: Re-examination of Henri Arnault de Zwolle

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:06:56 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

red chilis

Re: red chilis

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 20:10:14 -0700

12 lines

New Thread

Registration

Registration

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 17:02:10 -0500

24 lines

Re: Registration

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:16:08 -0500

51 lines

Re: Registration

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 23:22:34 -0500

37 lines

Re: Registration

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:44:51 -0500

44 lines

Re: Registration

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:38:44 +0100

32 lines

Re: Registration

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:52:35 -0800

26 lines

Re: Registration

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:01:47 -0800

31 lines

Re: Registration

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 15:20:04 -0500

18 lines

Re: Registration

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:28:05 +0100

20 lines

Re: Registration

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:02:29 +0100

23 lines

Re: Registration

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:25:34 +0100

39 lines

New Thread

restoration Gaveau 1939 harpsichord Copenhagen Cathedral

restoration Gaveau 1939 harpsichord Copenhagen Cathedral

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 1 Mar 2001 07:50:45 +0100

54 lines

New Thread

scaling

Re: scaling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 13:52:17 -0700

46 lines

Re: scaling

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:14:56 -0500

46 lines

Re: scaling

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 15:03:13 -0800

118 lines

Re: scaling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 17:53:28 -0700

43 lines

Re: scaling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 22 Mar 2001 18:47:37 -0700

15 lines

Re: scaling

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 01:57:45 EST

22 lines

Re: scaling

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 08:03:57 -0000

102 lines

Re: scaling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:16:38 -0700

26 lines

Re: scaling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 07:20:05 -0700

23 lines

Re: scaling

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 23 Mar 2001 17:56:34 -0000

35 lines

Re: scaling

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 07:36:28 +0100

42 lines

Re: scaling

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 24 Mar 2001 18:02:25 -0000

65 lines

Re: scaling

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:49:28 -0600

20 lines

Re: scaling

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:36:43 -0500

30 lines

Re: scaling

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:46:42 -0700

32 lines

New Thread

SEHKS event

Re: SEHKS event

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 19 Mar 2001 15:00:37 -0500

54 lines

Re: SEHKS event

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:00:30 -0500

40 lines

Re: SEHKS event

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 09:36:04 EST

21 lines

Re: SEHKS event

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 20 Mar 2001 20:21:23 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

SEHKS event this week

SEHKS event this week

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 05:15:58 -0500

27 lines

Re: SEHKS event this week

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:41:42 -0500

29 lines

Re: SEHKS event this week

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:43:16 EST

15 lines

New Thread

Sophie Yates

Sophie Yates

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Mar 2001 08:41:52 -0000

21 lines

Re: Sophie Yates

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 4 Mar 2001 12:51:39 -0500

38 lines

Re: Sophie Yates

Hendrik Broekman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 21:29:07 -0500

37 lines

Re: Sophie Yates

Yann Morin <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 5 Mar 2001 15:43:45 +0100

33 lines

New Thread

Soundboard and humidity control

Soundboard and humidity control

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:02:40 -0800

134 lines

Re: Soundboard and humidity control

Cipolla, Phil <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:42:14 -0500

40 lines

Re: Soundboard and humidity control

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:04:00 -0500

26 lines

Re: Soundboard and humidity control

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:23:14 -0800

53 lines

New Thread

Source of finished wood products?****

Source of finished wood products?****

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 17:25:11 -0600

16 lines

New Thread

Speaking of flutes. . .

Speaking of flutes. . .

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 12:46:39 EST

23 lines

Re: Speaking of flutes. . .

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:11:26 -0800

37 lines

Re: Speaking of flutes. . .

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:13:30 -0500

37 lines

Re: Speaking of flutes. . .

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:32:45 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Specialization

Re: Specialization

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:12:14 -0500

100 lines

Re: Specialization

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:30:27 EST

19 lines

Re: Specialization

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 16:04:58 -0500

23 lines

Re: Specialization

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:28:28 +0200

33 lines

New Thread

Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members]

Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members]

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 18:01:47 +0200

27 lines

Re: Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders - HPSCHD-L members]

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 13:21:57 -0500

46 lines

New Thread

Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders- HPSCHD-L members]

Re: Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders- HPSCHD-L members]

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:53:43 +0200

22 lines

Re: Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders- HPSCHD-L members]

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:52:07 +0100

50 lines

Re: Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders- HPSCHD-L members]

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:51:01 +0200

32 lines

Re: Specialization [was: Re: Education for Harpsichord Builders- HPSCHD-L members]

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:11:41 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Staging

Staging

Melissa & Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 14:53:02 -0800

27 lines

Re: Staging

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 15:12:29 -0500

41 lines

Re: Staging

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:24:01 -0500

51 lines

Re: Staging

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:23:52 -0500

21 lines

Re: Staging

Melissa & Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 20:28:34 -0800

40 lines

Re: Staging

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:49:10 -0800

30 lines

Re: Staging

Melissa & Craig <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:59:05 -0800

41 lines

New Thread

Stembridge & Sevskaya

Stembridge & Sevskaya

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:45:42 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

stirred & shaken : Corrette

stirred & shaken : Corrette

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:56:50 -0500

62 lines

New Thread

stirred and shaken

stirred and shaken

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:13:51 -0500

56 lines

Re: stirred and shaken

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:41:25 -0500

29 lines

Re: stirred and shaken

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:17:19 -0600

18 lines

Re: stirred and shaken

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 17:22:48 -0500

34 lines

Re: stirred and shaken

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:43:36 -0800

22 lines

Re: stirred and shaken

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 15:51:00 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

sundry

sundry

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 17:37:14 -0500

85 lines

Re: sundry

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 10:41:15 +0200

96 lines

New Thread

tall and short

tall and short

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 12:09:09 -0500

28 lines

Re: tall and short

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 09:47:13 -0800

56 lines

Re: tall and short

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:58:35 -0700

15 lines

Re: tall and short

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 14:48:26 -0500

26 lines

Re: tall and short

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 21:35:55 +0200

28 lines

Re: tall and short

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 19:39:20 -0500

36 lines

Re: tall and short

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:46:41 +0100

44 lines

Re: tall and short

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:53:59 -0500

22 lines

Re: tall and short

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 19:04:35 -0500

63 lines

New Thread

Tannenberg

Tannenberg

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:42:35 +0100

38 lines

Re: Tannenberg

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:33:21 -0500

93 lines

Re: Tannenberg

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 17 Mar 2001 17:10:54 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Tannenberg organ at Madison VA

Tannenberg organ at Madison VA

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:42:50 -0500

56 lines

Re: Tannenberg organ at Madison VA

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 19:56:24 +0100

43 lines

New Thread

TANNENBERG TEMPERAMENT and CLAVICHORD flute]

Re: TANNENBERG TEMPERAMENT and CLAVICHORD flute]

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:26:14 -0800

59 lines

New Thread

Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes / crystal flute]

Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes / crystal flute]

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 17:44:54 +0100

25 lines

Re: Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes / crystal flute]

Jack Peters <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 11:07:31 -0800

34 lines

Re: Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes / crystal flute]

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:42:07 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes /crystal flute]

Re: Tannenberg's Terzen [was: Re: innovation / show tunes /crystal flute]

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:48:16 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

Temperament myths

Temperament myths

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:37:37 +0200

61 lines

New Thread

temperaments

temperaments

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:44:14 +0200

57 lines

New Thread

Temperaments and singing

Temperaments and singing

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:11:40 +0200

75 lines

New Thread

Tension

Tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:16:52 -0700

91 lines

Re: Tension

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 07:46:20 -0800

21 lines

Re: Tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:05:02 +0000

59 lines

Re: Tension

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:36:38 -0700

37 lines

Re: Tension

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:21:32 +0000

55 lines

New Thread

the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:35:14 -0500

106 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:33:53 -0500

25 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:58:58 -0500

137 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:59:53 -0500

26 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:41:23 -0500

26 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 07:31:04 +0100

50 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:47:15 -0500

31 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:56:20 -0500

156 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 22:12:18 +0200

43 lines

Re: the "all the thirds sharp" flame war, 1770's

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:37:11 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

The good, the bad, and the ugly

The good, the bad, and the ugly

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 16:06:43 -0500

29 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 17:04:40 EST

23 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 01:08:51 +0100

63 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 20:24:50 -0600

18 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 18:17:26 -0500

25 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 23:46:32 -0500

68 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 00:20:25 -0500

47 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:16:23 +0200

48 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 09:41:54 -0500

57 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 08:04:46 -0800

84 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:10:02 -0500

36 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:28:43 -0500

34 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:35:39 EST

32 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Cripe, Helen L. <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:33:26 -0500

106 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 12:41:28 EST

31 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 10:48:42 -0800

32 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 13:55:37 -0500

29 lines

Re: The good, the bad, and the ugly

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 20:36:57 +0100

48 lines

New Thread

THE NEW, NEW AND OLD NEW GROVE

Re: THE NEW, NEW AND OLD NEW GROVE

Hal L Haney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:05:43 -0700

47 lines

New Thread

these "ordinaire" temps

these "ordinaire" temps

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:30:25 -0500

38 lines

Re: these "ordinaire" temps

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:57:52 -0700

24 lines

Re: these "ordinaire" temps

Mark Slater <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 01:24:49 EST

20 lines

Re: these "ordinaire" temps

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 00:10:32 -0700

27 lines

New Thread

Translations (off-topic)

Translations (off-topic)

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:16:02 -0500

39 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:38:02 -0500

16 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 18:52:42 +0200

32 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:36:32 -0500

28 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:21:45 +0200

37 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:43:57 -0500

31 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 20:39:38 +0200

32 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:11:28 +0200

41 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:34:28 -0500

27 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 23:32:56 +0200

38 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 17:24:16 -0500

40 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:10:50 -0500

36 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 14:29:36 +0200

33 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:13:45 +0100

54 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:41:22 -0500

32 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:51:57 +0200

36 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:30:46 -0500

27 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Michael J. Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:45:34 -0500

35 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 18:59:07 +0200

31 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 12:52:43 -0500

39 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 23:15:48 +0200

36 lines

Re: Translations (off-topic)

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 20:05:00 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

transposition in Bach's f# minor toccata

transposition in Bach's f# minor toccata

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 31 Mar 2001 09:31:52 -0500

71 lines

New Thread

Verlet Bach toccata recording pitches

Verlet Bach toccata recording pitches

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 21:34:25 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:08:27 +0200

23 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 16:44:39 -0500

48 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 00:31:41 +0200

60 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 18:37:37 -0500

33 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 11:58:05 -0800

38 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 27 Mar 2001 17:48:39 -0500

69 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:30:56 +0200

42 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:42:48 -0500

33 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:06:28 -0500

30 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:10:28 +0200

34 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 09:18:56 -0500

35 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 16:57:04 +0200

25 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:06:04 +0200

37 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 10:22:35 -0500

32 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

d. collins <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:39:05 +0200

19 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:48:14 +0200

35 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 08:21:12 -0800

79 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 13:18:45 -0500

34 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 14:42:32 -0500

28 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

dcc <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:00:49 +0200

33 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:47:48 +0200

14 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:44:27 +0200

29 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 17:12:28 -0500

47 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:06:44 +0200

27 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

bgarfink <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 10:29:09 -0500

34 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 19:43:32 -0800

103 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 09:43:06 +0100

67 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 11:40:40 -0500

38 lines

Re: Verlet recording Chromatic Fantasie and Fugue - out of tune?

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 16:23:22 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Verlet samples on French Amazon

Verlet samples on French Amazon

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:32:17 -0500

10 lines

Re: Verlet samples on French Amazon

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:41:34 -0800

27 lines

Re: Verlet samples on French Amazon

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:51:17 -0800

33 lines

Re: Verlet samples on French Amazon

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 22:11:19 +0200

31 lines

New Thread

Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone

Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 20:05:07 -0500

38 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 28 Mar 2001 22:03:31 -0500

52 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:11:11 +0200

30 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone

Chris <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:23:21 +0200

42 lines

New Thread

Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 12:59:13 +0100

62 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:45:23 -0800

29 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 15:15:51 -0600

15 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 16:41:41 -0500

21 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:10:48 -0800

30 lines

Re: Verlet's chromatic F&F in meantone - go listen

Reid Byers <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 30 Mar 2001 10:17:39 +0100

81 lines

New Thread

Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book "Violet"

Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book "Violet"

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:23:55 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain

Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 7 Mar 2001 11:01:28 -0500

108 lines

New Thread

Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE

Re: Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 12:46:46 -0800

35 lines

Re: Violet Gordon Woodhouse Book Bargain GONE

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 8 Mar 2001 14:08:27 -0800

69 lines

New Thread

virginal

virginal

facanhajr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 19:24:13 -0300

29 lines

Re: virginal

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 11:09:26 +0200

52 lines

Re: virginal

facanhajr <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 26 Mar 2001 22:34:50 -0300

15 lines

New Thread

viruses

Re: viruses

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 11:30:43 -0700

12 lines

New Thread

We? Oui? or wee-wee

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:02:52 -0800

50 lines

New Thread

We? Oui? or wee-wee?

We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 02:19:48 -0800

120 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:07:32 -0500

57 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 07:13:14 -0800

20 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 07:36:39 -0800

30 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:20:00 -0700

23 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 09:09:37 -0800

46 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:31:17 -0700

33 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 18:32:45 +0100

25 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 10:01:11 -0800

27 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 14:07:57 EST

93 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Alan Watkins <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:03:26 -0800

62 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 16:02:01 -0500

64 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:44:50 -0800

32 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:53:35 -0800

20 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 13:59:06 -0800

18 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:34:11 -0700

87 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 15:42:47 -0800

28 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:40:31 -0700

20 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 19:10:03 -0600

30 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:32:21 +0100

32 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:20:40 -0700

31 lines

Re: We? Oui? or wee-wee?

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:09:28 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

web update

Re: web update

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 6 Mar 2001 11:53:06 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

Werckmeister 1707

Werckmeister 1707

Johan Norrback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 08:34:31 +0200

30 lines

Re: Werckmeister 1707

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 13:51:30 +0200

44 lines

Re: Werckmeister 1707

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 07:00:37 -0500

19 lines

Re: Werckmeister 1707

Kirk McElhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:21:33 +0200

31 lines

Re: Werckmeister 1707

Edward K. Dunham <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 09:15:47 -0500

48 lines

Re: Werckmeister 1707

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:26:35 +0100

18 lines

Re: Werckmeister 1707

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 29 Mar 2001 14:56:13 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

whatever

Re: whatever

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 17:02:05 -0500

44 lines

Re: whatever

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 00:40:59 EST

63 lines

Re: whatever

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:50:43 +0100

32 lines

Re: whatever

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:24:41 -0700

26 lines

New Thread

Whereabouts of Philip Tyre

Whereabouts of Philip Tyre

bellmartin <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 25 Mar 2001 06:58:07 -0600

19 lines

New Thread

wire history

wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Mar 2001 11:25:59 -0700

24 lines

Re: wire history

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Mar 2001 17:57:35 -0500

63 lines

Re: wire history

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 10 Mar 2001 23:13:09 -0500

28 lines

Re: wire history

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:34:42 -0000

54 lines

Re: wire history

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:44:54 -0500

40 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:11:14 -0700

37 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 09:23:47 -0700

16 lines

Re: wire history

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 08:24:11 -0800

20 lines

Re: wire history

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 11:59:40 -0500

40 lines

Re: wire history

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 10:50:12 -0600

16 lines

Re: wire history

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 18:06:31 +0100

37 lines

Re: wire history

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 13:21:01 -0500

57 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:15:23 -0700

33 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:36:38 -0700

38 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:41:55 -0700

26 lines

Re: wire history

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 21:12:58 -0800

66 lines

Re: wire history

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 11 Mar 2001 23:09:46 -0600

16 lines

Re: wire history

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 00:30:46 -0800

38 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:09:35 -0700

35 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 08:07:40 -0700

50 lines

Re: wire history

Nicholas Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 12 Mar 2001 12:19:51 -0500

32 lines

wire history

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:47:56 +0100

65 lines

Re: wire history

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:33:35 -0500

84 lines

Re: wire history

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:29:04 +0000

40 lines

wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 09:02:58 -0700

59 lines

Re: wire history

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 08:29:30 -0800

27 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 10:17:02 -0700

51 lines

Re: wire history

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 11:43:25 -0600

17 lines

Re: wire history

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 21:04:37 +0100

83 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:36:30 -0700

32 lines

Re: wire history

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 20:03:52 -0500

18 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:03:45 -0700

31 lines

Re: wire history

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:28:18 +0100

26 lines

Re: wire history

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:49:57 +0100

27 lines

Re: wire history

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:20:47 -0500

74 lines

Re: wire history

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:52:16 +0000

33 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:55:49 -0700

107 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:05:15 -0700

21 lines

Re: wire history

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:12:39 +0000

40 lines

Re: wire history

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 11:22:00 -0500

24 lines

Re: wire history

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:55:39 -0500

34 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:21:31 -0700

42 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:41:54 -0700

24 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:43:24 -0700

13 lines

Re: wire history

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 21:50:32 -0500

30 lines

Re: wire history

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 19:14:58 -0800

53 lines

Re: wire history

Bill <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:09:12 +0100

87 lines

Re: wire history

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:24:26 +0000

31 lines

Re: wire history

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:15:54 +0000

61 lines

Re: wire history

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:31:46 -0500

30 lines

Re: wire history

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 08:04:58 -0700

70 lines

Re: wire history

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 14:55:43 -0500

78 lines

Re: wire history

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 22:43:07 +0100

41 lines

Re: wire history

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 10:01:24 +0100

62 lines

New Thread

wire research

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:56:07 -0700

35 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 15:48:23 -0700

29 lines

Re: wire research

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 16:38:45 -0800

74 lines

Re: wire research

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 17:24:27 -0800

39 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 18:53:42 -0700

92 lines

Re: wire research

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 18:14:09 -0800

17 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:14:22 -0700

35 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:31:42 -0700

23 lines

Re: wire research

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 19:16:19 -0800

34 lines

Re: wire research

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:33:50 -0600

14 lines

Re: wire research

Gillian Alcock <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 15:31:06 +1100

37 lines

wire research

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 00:00:32 EST

32 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:30:14 -0700

38 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:38:20 -0700

42 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 13 Mar 2001 22:45:29 -0700

22 lines

Re: wire research

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 09:16:12 -0600

27 lines

Re: wire research

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 10:14:29 -0500

39 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 08:58:44 -0700

21 lines

Re: wire research

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 16:07:54 +0000

41 lines

Re: wire research

David Pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:48:20 -0500

27 lines

Re: wire research

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 13:04:08 -0600

19 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 14 Mar 2001 12:39:22 -0700

20 lines

Re: wire research

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 10:17:50 +0000

53 lines

Re: wire research

Owen Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 07:44:59 -0800

26 lines

Re: wire research

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:54:16 -0600

23 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:14:13 -0700

31 lines

Re: wire research

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 16:23:07 +0000

41 lines

Re: wire research

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 16:18:11 +0000

43 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 09:45:18 -0700

14 lines

Re: wire research

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:22:56 -0600

16 lines

Re: wire research

James <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 15 Mar 2001 13:20:51 -0700

19 lines

Re: wire research

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 16 Mar 2001 09:23:57 +0000

27 lines

Re: wire research

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 18 Mar 2001 11:40:35 +0100

95 lines

New Thread

wire stuff