LISTSERV 16.0

Help for HPSCHD-L Archives


HPSCHD-L Archives

HPSCHD-L Archives


February 2000


View:

Show Author | Hide Author
Show Table of Contents | Hide Table of Contents

 

Table of Contents:

$1k klavier (1 message)
$89k klavier (2 messages)
'apax legomena (1 message)
(Off topic) Meantone & Music Therapy (3 messages)
(was: vocabularium) (1 message)
*** FrancioDalini (was *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense) (1 message)
*** Keyboard height (1 message)
*** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense (8 messages)
*** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense*********** (1 message)
****** Brilliant Bach (1 message)
**************Re: open score and hazing (1 message)
************Re: piano hurling (1 message)
**********The only good keyboard is high keyboard (3 messages)
*********pig iron (2 messages)
********Re: pig iron (1 message)
********strong verbs****** (5 messages)
******Vocabularium+ nonsene (6 messages)
*****Beautiful Erard recording (1 message)
*****Clique... (1 message)
*****off topic (1 message)
*****trebuchets (2 messages)
*****vocabularium (5 messages)
*****[Fwd: Serial music, (1 message)
*****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!] (13 messages)
*****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage,and politics - you MUST look at this!!] (5 messages)
****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology (6 messages)
****long (time ago): Buxtehude (2 messages)
****NYTimes (1 message)
****Re: Lapped dovetails and other terms (1 message)
***clavier, fourfold artistry manualiter or pedaliter? (1 message)
***Haydn (1 message)
***LP -> CD (1 message)
***Meantone & Music Therapy (2 messages)
***Schoenberg (2 messages)
***US Medical System (was Houston Opera) (4 messages)
***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)****** (1 message)
***waveform analysis of baroque music (3 messages)
**Re: Good Home Required... (3 messages)
**Re: Good Home Required... and good ship (12 messages)
**Re: piano hurling (1 message)
**Re: Smile when ya use strong verbs, Pardner! (2 messages)
*Leonhardt/Skowroneck Dulcken (1 message)
*RE: Brilliant Bach (1 message)
1440 harpsichord illustration (1 message)
18th ct Encyclopedia [Re: ZEDLER online] (3 messages)
<No subject> (17 messages)
<no subject> (manualiter getting away from it again) (2 messages)
<no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj. Toccata) (2 messages)
<no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata ) (3 messages)
<no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata) (12 messages)
>*******V...Of Mars probes and pianos - a hit or AMIS? (1 message)
Accordion-esque (13 messages)
ADDENDUM Re: Leonhardt, Mietke, BWV 904 (1 message)
advice (3 messages)
advice****** (2 messages)
All the Bach That's Fit to Print (25 messages)
Alternative instrumentation (1 message)
Anyone writing a novel? (3 messages)
arpichordum (5 messages)
Art of Fugue Query (2 messages)
Art of Whales? (3 messages)
article: harpsichords ... 1st half of 19th ct. (3 messages)
Aussie Harpsichords ? (3 messages)
AW: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach]) (1 message)
AW: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach]) (1 message)
AW: LP -> CD (1 message)
AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letter to NYT [was: All the Bach]) (1 message)
AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach]) (2 messages)
AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach]) (3 messages)
Bach Chorale Partitas (2 messages)
Bach D-major toccata (2 messages)
Bach Editions - more thoughts (2 messages)
Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi (9 messages)
Bach Toccatas on record (2 messages)
Bach toccatas, gigue fugue, random thoughts, etc. (1 message)
Bach toccatas--editions (5 messages)
Bach's D-Major Toccata (1 message)
Bach's ears (1 message)
Battle Won, Now... Questions? (3 messages)
Beethoven's ghost (8 messages)
Beethoven's ghost (Rosemary-spoiler) (1 message)
Bethanienklooster, Amsterdam 12 Feb. Partitas J.S. Bach (1 message)
blanket condemnation (1 message)
Bob Haskins? (1 message)
Bob van Asperen (19 messages)
Bob van Asperen****** (2 messages)
Bob van Asperen******** (2 messages)
bridge pinning (7 messages)
bridge pinning - another possibility (4 messages)
bridge pinning - progress (2 messages)
bridge pinning - progress/another possibility (1 message)
bridge pins (9 messages)
Brilliant Bach (10 messages)
Brilliant Boxen of J.S. Bach release dates (1 message)
Buckley (5 messages)
Cabezon, clavichords, and gracing (1 message)
Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.) (9 messages)
celebrity harpsichordists, other side (1 message)
celebrity harpsichordists, other side** (1 message)
Clavichord for sale (1 message)
clavier (7 messages)
Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos (4 messages)
Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos***** (2 messages)
Clef question (2 messages)
Colonial origins (3 messages)
complete nonsense (1 message)
Consensus (2 messages)
D major toccata (1 message)
Dampers... (2 messages)
Debussy on Erard (was: Fuguesday) (1 message)
Debussy/Erard (5 messages)
do we care? (1 message)
Dolmetsch's Conflicts (1 message)
Dover/BG editions JSB (2 messages)
Dovetails (1 message)
Dulcken (5 messages)
Dulcken and orchestral textures. (1 message)
Dulcken lute stop (1 message)
Dulcken lute stop*** (1 message)
Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC) (6 messages)
Early Music America magazine (6 messages)
ebay Chinese** (3 messages)
ebay item (4 messages)
ebay items (was ebay item) (2 messages)
editions (1 message)
Efficient Use of Practice Time (4 messages)
electronic hpschds (5 messages)
electronic hpschds***** (3 messages)
Email adres (1 message)
English non-short octaves (was Muselar key lever ratios and tuning) (1 message)
Ensemble intonation: Valotti (1 message)
etymologies (2 messages)
FAKE EARLY INSTRUMENTS. An observation (2 messages)
FePo "headway" (1 message)
fingerings was Re: Bach toccatas--editions (1 message)
For your information, should you be in the viewing area (11 messages)
For your information, should you be in the viewing area**** (1 message)
Foreign tongues (2 messages)
fortepianos (1 message)
Fourth try, for Margaret (2 messages)
Fretted clav., was Re: KdF; was NYTimes pffft (1 message)
fretting conflicts in clavichords (3 messages)
Froberger discography (4 messages)
Froberger discography (long) (2 messages)
Froberger discography - major omission! (2 messages)
Froberger discography, Couchet, Drummont (1 message)
Fuguesday (8 messages)
Fuguesday***** (1 message)
Fuguesday****** (5 messages)
Fuguesday, and pianaphilia (1 message)
Fw: rescue Bach-autographs (1 message)
Fwd: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this... (1 message)
Fwd: Harpsichord Shop in Dunedin. (2 messages)
Fwd: Second attempt to send (2 messages)
G major fugue BWV 577 for organ (2 messages)
Gale force winds: explanation (10 messages)
Gale force winds: explanation -shamefully of list (1 message)
gals (2 messages)
General apology (2 messages)
good grief (1 message)
GOOD GRIEF--ALL READ! (1 message)
Good Home Required... (2 messages)
Hannibal Lecter... (2 messages)
Hannibal Lecter...******** (2 messages)
Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing) (10 messages)
Harpsichord hurling (10 messages)
Harpsichord hurling**** (1 message)
Harpsichord in Harare (1 message)
Harpsichord in Harare? (6 messages)
Harpsichord society in San Diego ? (3 messages)
harpsichord sounds on computer sound cards (1 message)
Hawley patent steel wire making 1840 (1 message)
Haydn (13 messages)
Haydn (was Curtis) (16 messages)
Henle editions (Was: JSB eds) (1 message)
HIP Kanon (2 messages)
HIP opera (6 messages)
historical iron and steel music wire (1 message)
history, as in "we know" (1 message)
Houston Grand Opera (9 messages)
How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site) (11 messages)
How much is Valotti used? (3 messages)
How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site) (11 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 12 Feb 2000 to 13 Feb 2000 (#2000-48) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 15 Feb 2000 to 16 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-53) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-57) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 18 Feb 2000 to 19 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-59) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-65) (5 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 23 Feb 2000 to 24 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-68) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 24 Feb 2000 (#2000-69) (2 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 24 Feb 2000 to 25 Feb 2000 (#2000-70) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 25 Feb 2000 to 26 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-71) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 Feb 2000 to 27 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-73) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Jan 2000 to 30 Jan 2000 (#2000-29) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Jan 2000 to 31 Jan 2000 (#2000-30) (3 messages)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 31 Jan 2000 to 1 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-31) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-40) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-40) (1 message)
HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Feb 2000 to 9 Feb 2000 (#2000-44) (3 messages)
If you are near Dallas, Stamford (Connecticut),San Diego, or Los Angeles (1 message)
interesting CDs and reviews (1 message)
Irving Berlin's transposing piano (1 message)
ivory (14 messages)
ivory and the Wittmayer (1 message)
JC Bach's Zumpe (1 message)
jefferson (13 messages)
jefferson (fwd) (1 message)
jefferson** (6 messages)
jefferson***** (2 messages)
jefferson****** (6 messages)
JSB toccata editions (2 messages)
KdF (45 messages)
KdF ***** (2 messages)
KdF ... and NYT revisited (8 messages)
KdF on fretted clavichord (11 messages)
KdF on fretted clavichord, + clav recordings seeking publisher.... (3 messages)
KdF****** (2 messages)
KdF; was NYTimes pffft (9 messages)
KdF; was NYTimes protest (2 messages)
Key colours (1 message)
key colours (was temperament article) (17 messages)
Keyboard height (56 messages)
Keyboard height********** (1 message)
keyboard needed (4 messages)
King Solomon's harpsichords, and Froberger (2 messages)
King Solomon, harpsichord builder (17 messages)
King Solomon, harpsichord builder****** (2 messages)
Kunst der Fuge (1 message)
Lapped dovetails (9 messages)
Lapped dovetails and other terms (9 messages)
Lapped dovetails and other terms****** (1 message)
Lapped dovetails and other terms******* (1 message)
Leonhardt (1 message)
Leonhardt's Duclken and Mietke (1 message)
Leonhardt's Dulcked and Mietke (3 messages)
Leonhardt's Dulcken and Mietke (5 messages)
Leonhardt, Dulcken/Skowronek (7 messages)
Leonhardt, Mietke, BWV 904 (29 messages)
Leonhardt, Mietke, BWV 904 - Skowroneck/Dulcken (1 message)
Leonhardt/Skowroneck Dulcken (10 messages)
Leonhardt/Skowroneck Dulcken******** (1 message)
letter to NYT [was: All the Bach] (2 messages)
List Guidelines -- ALL READ (1 message)
Locator (1 message)
long: Buxtehude ...Re: [toccatas as organ works (2 messages)
long: Buxtehude ...Re: [toccatas as organ works] (1 message)
LP -> CD (9 messages)
LP -> CD** (4 messages)
Manual Changes (1 message)
Margaret (1 message)
Material used for Stein Kapsel Bushings (3 messages)
meantone etc. and perception (2 messages)
metallurgy questions (12 messages)
Mietke and counterpoint (2 messages)
Mietke harpsichords (3 messages)
Mietkes (5 messages)
Modern scholarship, was Re: How much is Valotti used? (3 messages)
More on editions (1 message)
Morley, and in search of: (3 messages)
MP-harpsichord: "Romanes, eunt domus" [was Re: vocabularium] (2 messages)
Muselar key lever ratios and tuning (6 messages)
muselar playing (2 messages)
muselar playing position (1 message)
music for 3 harpsichords (5 messages)
Music of the Planets (2 messages)
Musical jocks (1 message)
My Lady Careys Dompe (7 messages)
National Meantone Day, was Re: Ottavino (1 message)
new (4 messages)
New Bach editions (1 message)
New web page (2 messages)
New York Bashing (was: a whole bunch of stuff) (4 messages)
New York Times scales new depths in musicology. Pretty long. (5 messages)
New York: hopeless? (2 messages)
nice (1 message)
notching bridge pins (9 messages)
notching bridge pins - Stringing (11 messages)
NY Times (1 message)
NY Times arrives in the 18th century (11 messages)
NYT etc. (3 messages)
NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letter to NYT [was: All the Bach]) (4 messages)
NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [wa... (1 message)
NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach]) (2 messages)
NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach]) (1 message)
NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letterto NYT [wa... (1 message)
Of Mars probes and pianos - a hit or AMIS? (1 message)
Offenbach's harpsichord (1 message)
Old/new/old music (1 message)
on-line library catalogs (1 message)
Oops (2 messages)
Oops and New web page (4 messages)
open score (fwd) (2 messages)
open score and hazing (6 messages)
ora- et labora-torium Re: vocabularium (1 message)
ordering books, music (2 messages)
organ string stops (1 message)
Organa gallica (1 message)
Ottavino (7 messages)
Ottavino for Albert Klein (4 messages)
Ottavino/King of Sweden (1 message)
Oxford Companion (2 messages)
Oxford Companion... (1 message)
Pachyderm (2 messages)
Pantaleons (was: Storm warning etc.) (3 messages)
Pantalon and Keyboard Pantalon: and the Boston MFA catalogue (1 message)
Parmentier - WTC (1 message)
Paul Frits (2 messages)
piano hurling (13 messages)
piano hurling********* (1 message)
pig iron (1 message)
playing harpsichord like the devil? (1 message)
Pleyel patent iron wire making 1810 (1 message)
Poor Salieri? (3 messages)
Posting Format -- ALL READ (1 message)
posts (2 messages)
prellmekanic (2 messages)
pricey hchord (1 message)
pricy hpschd (4 messages)
Pricy hpsd! (7 messages)
Pricy hpsd!***** (1 message)
Pricy hpsd!******* (1 message)
Pricy hpsd!********** (1 message)
queries re Wittmayer harpsichord (7 messages)
Query: Blasco de Nebra (8 messages)
Query: WTC I - Bachs autograph (2 messages)
Query: WTC I - Bachs autograph***** (1 message)
Re2: HIP Kanon (2 messages)
Recording query (1 message)
repairing sheet music and books (1 message)
Report from Hoople - Sally Hemmings (1 message)
rescue Bach-autographs (1 message)
Roland electronic harpsichord/organ/celesta (5 messages)
San Diego Harpsichord Society (3 messages)
Schulenberg book (1 message)
Scope of list (4 messages)
see the 1710 Mietke (7 messages)
seeking advice... (5 messages)
serial piece (1 message)
short octave tuning (2 messages)
short-octave tuning (11 messages)
short-octave tuning***** (3 messages)
Smile when ya use strong verbs, Pardner! (1 message)
Some items of passing interest. (2 messages)
something Italian... (5 messages)
SSCM 2000 meeting in Vermillion (1 message)
Stay tuned for Haider's Haydn (5 messages)
Stay tuned for Haider's Haydn**** (1 message)
Storm warning (1 message)
Storm warning: apology (1 message)
Storm warning: format problems (1 message)
Storm warning: Gale-force winds in the midwest (18 messages)
Storm warnings (1 message)
strange people (1 message)
strange people***** (1 message)
Subject: Re: Harpsichord hurling (2 messages)
T. Koopman live at Amsterdam Feb. 08, 1986 (1 message)
Tambeau M. Blancrocher (2 messages)
Teldec Bach (2 messages)
Temperament article at EMA site (13 messages)
Tempo in clvchrd vs hrpschrd (1 message)
The Momerath (6 messages)
The only good keyboard is high keyboard (1 message)
Therapeutic intervals (1 message)
Thomas Steiner (4 messages)
Toccatas (16 messages)
Toccate (1 message)
Touch was [Re: electronic hpschds*] (1 message)
transposers (2 messages)
Transposers, was Keyboard height (8 messages)
tuning harpsichord? (5 messages)
tuning unisons or something (1 message)
Virtual reality (9 messages)
visit to Alan Curtis (15 messages)
vocabularium (9 messages)
vocabularium==it's elementarium! (1 message)
Walter mix-up (1 message)
Walters and Josephs (1 message)
Walters and Josephs (was: travels in Europe) (1 message)
Wanted: Colleague for Lenora (2 messages)
waveform analysis of baroque music (4 messages)
waveform analysis of baroque music******* (1 message)
Weimar Schloßkirche Compenius (4 messages)
Where's Redstone? (2 messages)
Wittmayer bargain? (4 messages)
wrought iron (15 messages)
your mail (7 messages)
Zut alors! (Re: Fuguesday******) (2 messages)
[Fwd: Re: How much is Valotti used? (1 message)
[Fwd: Symposium on musical instruments] (1 message)
[toccatas as organ works] (3 messages)

LISTSERV Archives

LISTSERV Archives

HPSCHD-L Home

HPSCHD-L Home

Subject Sorted by Subject, Chronologically

From

Date

Size

New Thread

$1k klavier

$1k klavier

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 14:01:52 -0500

16 lines

New Thread

$89k klavier

$89k klavier

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:59:02 -0500

13 lines

Re: $89k klavier

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 07:21:11 +1100

20 lines

New Thread

'apax legomena

'apax legomena

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 11:35:09 -0900

24 lines

New Thread

(Off topic) Meantone & Music Therapy

(Off topic) Meantone & Music Therapy

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 09:58:22 -0500

32 lines

Re: (Off topic) Meantone & Music Therapy

Edward Marsh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 17:22:24 -0000

30 lines

Re: (Off topic) Meantone & Music Therapy

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:51:47 +0100

74 lines

New Thread

(was: vocabularium)

(was: vocabularium)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:13:03 +0100

86 lines

New Thread

*** FrancioDalini (was *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense)

Re: *** FrancioDalini (was *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:04:49 +0100

36 lines

New Thread

*** Keyboard height

Re: *** Keyboard height

Tom Phinney <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 22:59:07 -0700

25 lines

New Thread

*** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

*** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

Carlos Nogus <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:31:17 PST

27 lines

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:00:44 -0500

34 lines

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:18:23 -0500

46 lines

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 23:24:44 -0500

83 lines

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:20:25 -0300

15 lines

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:55:10 +0100

21 lines

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:18:37 -0500

51 lines

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:41:53 -0500

43 lines

New Thread

*** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense***********

Re: *** Tango band__was vocabularium+nonsense***********

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:12:33 EST

22 lines

New Thread

****** Brilliant Bach

Re: ****** Brilliant Bach

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:38:09 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

**************Re: open score and hazing

**************Re: open score and hazing

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 06:49:29 EST

20 lines

New Thread

************Re: piano hurling

************Re: piano hurling

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 14:30:45 -0900

60 lines

New Thread

**********The only good keyboard is high keyboard

Re: **********The only good keyboard is high keyboard

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 07:00:11 -0900

52 lines

Re: **********The only good keyboard is high keyboard

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 19:05:18 +0100

35 lines

Re: **********The only good keyboard is high keyboard

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:38:23 EST

21 lines

New Thread

*********pig iron

*********pig iron

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:21:33 -0900

31 lines

Re: *********pig iron

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:48:17 EST

38 lines

New Thread

********Re: pig iron

********Re: pig iron

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:40:22 -0900

35 lines

New Thread

********strong verbs******

********strong verbs******

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 07:58:56 -0900

34 lines

Re: ********strong verbs******

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:26:53 -0900

48 lines

Re: ********strong verbs******

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:52:50 +0000

38 lines

Re: ********strong verbs******

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:31:21 EST

16 lines

Re: ********strong verbs******

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:13:28 +1100

25 lines

New Thread

******Vocabularium+ nonsene

******Vocabularium+ nonsene

Carlos Nogus <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 11:26:41 PST

25 lines

Re: ******Vocabularium+ nonsene

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 14:48:31 -0600

35 lines

Re: ******Vocabularium+ nonsene

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 15:51:15 -0500

33 lines

Re: ******Vocabularium+ nonsene

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 04:17:16 +0000

53 lines

Re: ******Vocabularium+ nonsene

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:36:22 -0500

34 lines

Re: ******Vocabularium+ nonsene

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:49:37 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

*****Beautiful Erard recording

*****Beautiful Erard recording

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 09:27:51 -0600

27 lines

New Thread

*****Clique...

Re: *****Clique...

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 22:17:19 -0600

14 lines

New Thread

*****off topic

Re: *****off topic

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 23:20:28 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

*****trebuchets

Re: *****trebuchets

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:16:43 -0800

12 lines

Re: *****trebuchets

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 22:28:47 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

*****vocabularium

Re: *****vocabularium

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:08:47 -0500

30 lines

Re: *****vocabularium

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:59:49 -0500

26 lines

Re: *****vocabularium

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:53:40 -0600

19 lines

Re: *****vocabularium

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:29:03 -0500

16 lines

Re: *****vocabularium

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 16:50:00 -0600

12 lines

New Thread

*****[Fwd: Serial music,

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music,

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 07:32:00 GMT

23 lines

New Thread

*****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

*****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 14:59:59 -0800

98 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 18:00:35 -0500

20 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:51:29 EST

18 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 17:34:28 -0500

29 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:57:53 -0500

24 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:03:00 -0500

26 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:57:36 -0600

23 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:07:06 -0800

26 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 13:47:01 -0500

44 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:09:52 -0500

53 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 10:04:14 +0000

47 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 11:28:31 -0500

56 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

JM Reichow <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 20:44:03 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

*****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage,and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage,and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 02:28:36 +0000

29 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage,and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 15:50:46 +0000

37 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage,and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 06:04:36 +1100

50 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage,and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 20:24:32 EST

19 lines

Re: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage,and politics - you MUST look at this!!]

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 16:12:11 +0100

26 lines

New Thread

****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology

Re: ****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology

Carlos Nogus <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 17:49:46 PST

27 lines

Re: ****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 23:42:18 EST

16 lines

Re: ****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 20:57:52 -0900

20 lines

Re: ****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 08:23:50 -0300

13 lines

Re: ****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:02:07 -0000

30 lines

Re: ****Leonhard AAAARRRRRGGGGGH!!!!!!! Theology

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 08:13:29 -0500

36 lines

New Thread

****long (time ago): Buxtehude

Re: ****long (time ago): Buxtehude

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:43:08 +0100

32 lines

Re: ****long (time ago): Buxtehude

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 00:25:47 +0000

28 lines

New Thread

****NYTimes

****NYTimes

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:52:04 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

****Re: Lapped dovetails and other terms

****Re: Lapped dovetails and other terms

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:24:56 +0000

23 lines

New Thread

***clavier, fourfold artistry manualiter or pedaliter?

Re: ***clavier, fourfold artistry manualiter or pedaliter?

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:59:00 +0100

32 lines

New Thread

***Haydn

Re: ***Haydn

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 23:16:26 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

***LP -> CD

***LP -> CD

William Vine <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 21:57:42 -0000

23 lines

New Thread

***Meantone & Music Therapy

Re: ***Meantone & Music Therapy

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 13:23:35 -0800

63 lines

Re: ***Meantone & Music Therapy

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 19:41:52 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

***Schoenberg

***Schoenberg

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 19:00:29 -0500

39 lines

Re: ***Schoenberg

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 08:20:28 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)

***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:32:18 +0100

18 lines

Re: ***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:09:19 -0800

26 lines

Re: ***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 17:18:20 -0500

38 lines

Re: ***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)

Albert M. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:22:43 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)******

Re: ***US Medical System (was Houston Opera)******

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:28:49 EST

19 lines

New Thread

***waveform analysis of baroque music

Re: ***waveform analysis of baroque music

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 00:31:46 +0100

23 lines

Re: ***waveform analysis of baroque music

Tom Phinney <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 20:25:12 -0700

24 lines

Re: ***waveform analysis of baroque music

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:44:13 +0100

38 lines

New Thread

**Re: Good Home Required...

**Re: Good Home Required...

Randall Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 23:43:59 +0000

21 lines

**Re: Good Home Required...

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:08:30 +0000

38 lines

**Re: Good Home Required...

Paul G. Masser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 09:55:33 -0500

47 lines

New Thread

**Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 13:04:34 -0300

17 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 20:13:53 EST

23 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:27:23 +1100

31 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:27:20 -0500

24 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:25:37 -0500

28 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 00:18:23 +0100

32 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Heikki Levanto <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:33:06 +0100

16 lines

**Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:40:51 -0500

44 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:58:33 -0500

48 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 08:37:20 -0500

59 lines

**Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Paul G. Masser <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:04:29 -0500

29 lines

Re: **Re: Good Home Required... and good ship

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 22:18:35 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

**Re: piano hurling

**Re: piano hurling

Randall Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:17:24 +0000

25 lines

New Thread

**Re: Smile when ya use strong verbs, Pardner!

**Re: Smile when ya use strong verbs, Pardner!

Randall Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 14:01:08 +0000

21 lines

Re: **Re: Smile when ya use strong verbs, Pardner!

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 14:01:02 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

*Leonhardt/Skowroneck Dulcken

Re: *Leonhardt/Skowroneck Dulcken

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:11:16 +0100

31 lines

New Thread

*RE: Brilliant Bach

*RE: Brilliant Bach

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:08:47 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

1440 harpsichord illustration

1440 harpsichord illustration

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 18:58:48 -0500

14 lines

New Thread

18th ct Encyclopedia [Re: ZEDLER online]

18th ct Encyclopedia [Re: ZEDLER online]

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 20:58:52 +0100

40 lines

Re: 18th ct Encyclopedia [Re: ZEDLER online]

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 17:43:26 -0500

24 lines

Re: 18th ct Encyclopedia [Re: ZEDLER online]

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:52:21 +0100

13 lines

New Thread

<No subject>

<No subject>

Steven Kallstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 10:25:48 -0600

23 lines

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:29:55 EST

22 lines

<No subject>

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:49:10 -0900

47 lines

<No subject>

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:52:36 -0600

16 lines

<No subject>

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 04:05:19 +0000

50 lines

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:06:22 EST

33 lines

<No subject>

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:38:36 +0000

22 lines

<No subject>

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:35:31 +0000

70 lines

<No subject>

Hal L Haney <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:11:59 -0700

28 lines

<No subject>

James <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 13:12:45 -0800

23 lines

<No subject>

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 19:02:39 -0500

20 lines

Re: <no subject>

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 19:47:33 -0800

71 lines

Re: <no subject>

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 04:47:25 +0000

61 lines

<No subject>

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 10:28:19 EST

19 lines

Re: <no subject>

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 11:00:13 EST

27 lines

<No subject>

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 14:28:17 -0300

16 lines

<No subject>

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:36:34 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

<no subject> (manualiter getting away from it again)

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting away from it again)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:57:56 +0100

39 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting away from it again)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:54:09 +0000

81 lines

New Thread

<no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj. Toccata)

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj. Toccata)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 23:12:49 +0100

69 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj. Toccata)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 10:07:27 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

<no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata )

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata )

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 10:16:55 -0500

19 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata )

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 11:07:57 -0500

22 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata )

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:52:06 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

<no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 04:07:16 +0000

103 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Pierre-Henri Jondot <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 08:25:20 +0100

87 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 04:30:46 EST

27 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Pierre-Henri Jondot <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:16:42 +0100

30 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 09:16:22 -0500

28 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 02:24:24 +0100

113 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:46:15 EST

23 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:24:41 -0500

23 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 02:27:45 +0000

45 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 09:45:35 +0100

32 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:37:02 +0000

32 lines

Re: <no subject> (manualiter getting back to Bach's D maj.Toccata)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:48:50 +0100

37 lines

New Thread

>*******V...Of Mars probes and pianos - a hit or AMIS?

Re: >*******V...Of Mars probes and pianos - a hit or AMIS?

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 02:00:58 +0100

46 lines

New Thread

Accordion-esque

Accordion-esque

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 09:02:56 -0500

22 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 09:19:23 -0600

13 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 10:51:05 -0500

27 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

owen daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 11:11:23 -0500

18 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:34:52 -0500

32 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 12:51:03 -0500

28 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:41:38 +0000

45 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:05:14 -0500

119 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:02:55 -0600

16 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 17:40:10 -0500

35 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 19:30:46 -0500

54 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 21:55:48 -0500

34 lines

Re: Accordion-esque

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 03:10:00 +0100

35 lines

New Thread

ADDENDUM Re: Leonhardt, Mietke, BWV 904

ADDENDUM Re: Leonhardt, Mietke, BWV 904

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:04:18 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

advice

advice

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:30:02 -0800

18 lines

Re: advice

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 13:40:18 -0500

23 lines

Re: advice

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 13:48:35 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

advice******

Re: advice******

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 21:18:07 EST

18 lines

Re: advice******

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 00:57:34 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

All the Bach That's Fit to Print

All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 09:47:24 -0500

25 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Bruce Garetz <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 10:39:53 -0500

22 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Michael Kim <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 08:23:53 PST

34 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:32:07 +0000

41 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 12:39:32 EST

16 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Randall Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 13:43:55 +0000

16 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 16:10:19 EST

51 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 22:09:33 +0000

61 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:54:40 -0500

21 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Jon-o Addleman <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 18:24:39 -0500

83 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 19:10:40 EST

39 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 18:39:30 -0600

39 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 19:49:25 -0500

23 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:09:49 EST

21 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:13:14 EST

27 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:14:54 EST

23 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:27:57 EST

21 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 20:38:23 EST

29 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

elizabeth and david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 17:51:36 -0800

47 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:14:05 EST

17 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:08:29 -0500

28 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 10:19:10 -0500

37 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:41:33 EST

22 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 00:02:37 -0500

36 lines

Re: All the Bach That's Fit to Print

John Wall <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 22:33:48 +0000

51 lines

New Thread

Alternative instrumentation

Re: Alternative instrumentation

Enid Sutherland <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 21:19:44 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Anyone writing a novel?

Re: Anyone writing a novel?

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 12:15:34 -0500

13 lines

Re: Anyone writing a novel?

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 20:31:54 -0600

26 lines

Re: Anyone writing a novel?

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 23:16:36 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

arpichordum

arpichordum

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 13:57:04 -0500

23 lines

Re: arpichordum

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:48:13 EST

21 lines

Re: arpichordum

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 07:29:19 EST

23 lines

Re: arpichordum

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:03:19 -0500

55 lines

Re: arpichordum

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 19:42:48 -0600

14 lines

New Thread

Art of Fugue Query

Art of Fugue Query

Ben Chi <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:32:52 -0500

41 lines

Re: Art of Fugue Query

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 11:09:42 EST

25 lines

New Thread

Art of Whales?

Art of Whales?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:18:06 +0100

31 lines

Re: Art of Whales?

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 15:32:14 -0500

45 lines

Re: Art of Whales?

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 07:20:04 -0600

25 lines

New Thread

article: harpsichords ... 1st half of 19th ct.

article: harpsichords ... 1st half of 19th ct.

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:54:51 +0100

56 lines

Re: article: harpsichords ... 1st half of 19th ct.

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:45:08 +0100

25 lines

Re: article: harpsichords ... 1st half of 19th ct.

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:02:37 EST

20 lines

New Thread

Aussie Harpsichords ?

Aussie Harpsichords ?

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:25:59 +1100

15 lines

Re: Aussie Harpsichords ?

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 21:01:37 +0100

30 lines

Re: Aussie Harpsichords ?

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 07:45:33 +1100

45 lines

New Thread

AW: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach])

AW: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach])

Gabler, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:35:48 +0100

23 lines

New Thread

AW: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

AW: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

Gabler, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 09:17:48 +0100

21 lines

New Thread

AW: LP -> CD

AW: LP -> CD

Gabler, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:50:54 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

Gabler, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:01:46 +0100

25 lines

New Thread

AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach])

AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach])

Gabler, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:03:17 +0100

14 lines

Re: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re: letterto NYT [was: All the Bach])

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 04:19:33 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

Re: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:49:29 +0100

17 lines

Re: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 07:05:28 +0100

28 lines

Re: AW: NYTimes protest/AoF/learning harpsichord/clavichord (Re:letter to NYT [was: All the Bach])

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 12:43:46 -0500

42 lines

New Thread

Bach Chorale Partitas

Bach Chorale Partitas

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:27:03 EST

43 lines

Re: Bach Chorale Partitas

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:49:18 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Bach D-major toccata

Re: Bach D-major toccata

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:19:17 -0600

41 lines

Re: Bach D-major toccata

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:59:11 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

Bach Editions - more thoughts

Bach Editions - more thoughts

Francis Knights <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 21:23:21 -0000

254 lines

Re: Bach Editions - more thoughts

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:48:01 EST

26 lines

New Thread

Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 13:11:34 -0500

38 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 14:36:53 -0500

29 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:26:02 EST

20 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:21:43 -0500

27 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 05:25:17 +0000

32 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 08:29:16 EST

26 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:26:25 -0500

34 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:26:30 -0500

64 lines

Re: Bach toccatas on organ vs hpsi

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:38:41 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

Bach Toccatas on record

Bach Toccatas on record

Francis Knights <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:02:56 -0000

97 lines

Re: Bach Toccatas on record

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:17:18 -0300

13 lines

New Thread

Bach toccatas, gigue fugue, random thoughts, etc.

Bach toccatas, gigue fugue, random thoughts, etc.

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 13:56:59 -0600

90 lines

New Thread

Bach toccatas--editions

Re: Bach toccatas--editions

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:25:36 EST

22 lines

Re: Bach toccatas--editions

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:08:50 -0300

22 lines

Re: Bach toccatas--editions

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:29:22 +0100

19 lines

Re: Bach toccatas--editions

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 01:55:10 +0000

18 lines

Re: Bach toccatas--editions

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:26:28 -0500

35 lines

New Thread

Bach's D-Major Toccata

Re: Bach's D-Major Toccata

Chris Cartwright <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:02:20 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Bach's ears

Bach's ears

Valdemar <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 09:41:02 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Battle Won, Now... Questions?

Battle Won, Now... Questions?

Steven Kallstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 16:18:04 -0600

25 lines

Re: Battle Won, Now... Questions?

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:23:23 -0500

67 lines

Re: Battle Won, Now... Questions?

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:19:18 -0900

57 lines

New Thread

Beethoven's ghost

Re: Beethoven's ghost

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 18:47:53 -0500

14 lines

Re: Beethoven's ghost

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 16:30:47 -0800

32 lines

Re: Beethoven's ghost

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 02:25:10 -0500

23 lines

Re: Beethoven's ghost

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 09:36:30 +0100

27 lines

Re: Beethoven's ghost

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 03:56:45 -0500

32 lines

Re: Beethoven's ghost

Chris Cartwright <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 11:39:40 +0100

29 lines

Re: Beethoven's ghost

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:36:40 EST

20 lines

Re: Beethoven's ghost

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 07:44:04 EST

22 lines

New Thread

Beethoven's ghost (Rosemary-spoiler)

Re: Beethoven's ghost (Rosemary-spoiler)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 01:16:26 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

Bethanienklooster, Amsterdam 12 Feb. Partitas J.S. Bach

Bethanienklooster, Amsterdam 12 Feb. Partitas J.S. Bach

Gabler, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 12:06:11 +0100

19 lines

New Thread

blanket condemnation

blanket condemnation

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 19:45:38 -0800

22 lines

New Thread

Bob Haskins?

Bob Haskins?

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:07:36 -0800

16 lines

New Thread

Bob van Asperen

Bob van Asperen

david pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 08:36:12 +0000

17 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 06:52:20 -0600

29 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 08:07:00 EST

30 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:37:05 +0100

56 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:59:24 +0100

38 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:33:30 +0100

29 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:46:18 EST

32 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

Charles Stroom <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:00:18 +0019

39 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 18:06:18 +0100

29 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:08:24 -0600

36 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:54:31 -0600

32 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:57:46 -0500

24 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 16:25:28 -0600

27 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:28:15 -0500

26 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

kluck <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 07:56:15 +0100

48 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 10:00:51 +0100

47 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:40:19 +0100

25 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:54:10 -0600

31 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:05:42 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

Bob van Asperen******

Re: Bob van Asperen******

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:34:43 EST

29 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen******

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:02:54 +1100

42 lines

New Thread

Bob van Asperen********

Re: Bob van Asperen********

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:30:37 EST

23 lines

Re: Bob van Asperen********

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:39:43 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

bridge pinning

bridge pinning

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 09:24:05 -0500

22 lines

Re: bridge pinning

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 10:25:37 -0500

19 lines

Re: bridge pinning

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 12:52:26 -0600

26 lines

Re: bridge pinning

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 12:08:21 -0500

21 lines

Re: bridge pinning

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 10:22:43 -0800

30 lines

Re: bridge pinning

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 10:25:34 -0800

25 lines

Re: bridge pinning

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 18:32:48 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

bridge pinning - another possibility

bridge pinning - another possibility

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 15:41:36 -0500

55 lines

Re: bridge pinning - another possibility

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 13:20:36 -0900

56 lines

Re: bridge pinning - another possibility

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 15:59:24 +0100

35 lines

Re: bridge pinning - another possibility

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:07:59 +0100

30 lines

New Thread

bridge pinning - progress

bridge pinning - progress

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 21:53:06 -0500

37 lines

Re: bridge pinning - progress

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 21:53:37 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

bridge pinning - progress/another possibility

Re: bridge pinning - progress/another possibility

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 00:27:31 -0500

45 lines

New Thread

bridge pins

bridge pins

Michael Johnson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 18:56:46 -0000

29 lines

Re: bridge pins

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 13:58:39 -0600

29 lines

Re: bridge pins

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 18:27:45 -0500

41 lines

Re: bridge pins

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 22:16:06 -0500

56 lines

Re: bridge pins

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 09:54:08 +0100

47 lines

Re: bridge pins

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 20:01:34 +0100

20 lines

Re: bridge pins

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 13:58:19 -0600

18 lines

Re: bridge pins

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 01:05:49 +0100

56 lines

Re: Bridge Pins

George Candler <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 01:09:05 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

Brilliant Bach

Brilliant Bach

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 20:47:34 -0800

64 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:42:42 EST

29 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:56:51 +0100

32 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 14:03:27 -0500

40 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

Andrew Lagerquist <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 19:25:55 EST

13 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:38:19 EST

17 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:39:09 +0100

50 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:23:01 +0100

24 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 08:13:26 EST

27 lines

Re: Brilliant Bach

Andrew Lagerquist <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:15:22 EST

11 lines

New Thread

Brilliant Boxen of J.S. Bach release dates

Brilliant Boxen of J.S. Bach release dates

Gabler, Paul <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:35:16 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

Buckley

Buckley

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 19:33:54 -0500

21 lines

Re: Buckley

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 17:48:46 -0800

18 lines

Re: Buckley

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 21:38:04 EST

27 lines

Re: Buckley

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 10:35:17 -0600

34 lines

Re: Buckley

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 13:00:11 -0500

24 lines

New Thread

Cabezon, clavichords, and gracing

Cabezon, clavichords, and gracing

Robert Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:41:12 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 23:40:09 +0100

68 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 03:20:25 +0100

143 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

Alex Karahalios <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:36:06 -0700

20 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 08:28:11 +0100

28 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 09:19:14 +0100

45 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 09:31:31 +0100

47 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 13:13:10 +0100

32 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

Delwin D Fandrich <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:42:40 -0800

65 lines

Re: Cannibal Lector (was: Storm warning etc.)

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:36:07 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

celebrity harpsichordists, other side

celebrity harpsichordists, other side

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:44:17 -0500

21 lines

New Thread

celebrity harpsichordists, other side**

Re: celebrity harpsichordists, other side**

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:44:54 EST

16 lines

New Thread

Clavichord for sale

Clavichord for sale

Clayton Lehmann <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 18:11:48 -0600

17 lines

New Thread

clavier

clavier

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 05:34:57 +0000

43 lines

Re: clavier

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:01:01 +0100

51 lines

Re: clavier

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:13:34 EST

29 lines

Re: clavier

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 23:21:55 +0000

47 lines

Re: clavier

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 07:15:33 +0100

59 lines

Re: clavier

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 10:30:15 +0100

44 lines

Re: clavier

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:46:10 +0000

98 lines

New Thread

Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos

Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:58:40 -0500

22 lines

Re: Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos

ray ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 12:04:00 PST

14 lines

Re: Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 18:26:53 -0500

25 lines

Re: Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 20:50:15 -0600

29 lines

New Thread

Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos*****

Re: Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos*****

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 20:37:11 EST

19 lines

Re: Clavier vs clavier & Silbermann pianos*****

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 15:27:14 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

Clef question

Clef question

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:34:31 -0500

48 lines

Re: Clef question

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 14:16:10 -0500

41 lines

New Thread

Colonial origins

Colonial origins

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 13:14:05 EST

27 lines

Re: Colonial origins

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:14:57 -0500

26 lines

Re: Colonial origins

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 07:07:40 +1100

38 lines

New Thread

complete nonsense

Re: complete nonsense

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:03:33 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

Consensus

Re: Consensus

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:16:00 -0800

17 lines

Re: Consensus

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 05:54:53 +1100

22 lines

New Thread

D major toccata

Re: D major toccata

Pierre-Henri Jondot <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:54:52 +0100

55 lines

New Thread

Dampers...

Dampers...

Steven Kallstrom <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 14:22:48 -0600

20 lines

Re: Dampers...

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:50:48 EST

30 lines

New Thread

Debussy on Erard (was: Fuguesday)

Debussy on Erard (was: Fuguesday)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 15:04:43 -0600

45 lines

New Thread

Debussy/Erard

Debussy/Erard

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:26:11 EST

34 lines

Re: Debussy/Erard

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 18:59:26 -0600

35 lines

Re: Debussy/Erard

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 01:31:35 +0000

26 lines

Re: Debussy/Erard

L. Myers <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 19:01:06 -0800

36 lines

Re: Debussy/Erard

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:28:24 +0000

19 lines

New Thread

do we care?

do we care?

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:51:14 +0100

47 lines

New Thread

Dolmetsch's Conflicts

Dolmetsch's Conflicts

Brian Joyce <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 08:38:06 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Dover/BG editions JSB

Dover/BG editions JSB

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 13:06:59 -0600

115 lines

Re: Dover/BG editions JSB

Edward Marsh <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:02:04 -0000

37 lines

New Thread

Dovetails

Dovetails

Peter W. Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 17:54:46 -0500

55 lines

New Thread

Dulcken

Dulcken

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 12:35:21 -0600

38 lines

Re: Dulcken

Chris Cartwright <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 23:37:08 +0100

28 lines

Re: Dulcken

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:03:55 EST

23 lines

Re: Dulcken

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:51:12 -0500

35 lines

Re: Dulcken

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 08:16:37 +0100

148 lines

New Thread

Dulcken and orchestral textures.

Dulcken and orchestral textures.

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:35:05 -0800

19 lines

New Thread

Dulcken lute stop

Re: Dulcken lute stop

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:39:03 -0600

43 lines

New Thread

Dulcken lute stop***

Re: Dulcken lute stop***

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 22:40:15 EST

28 lines

New Thread

Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC)

Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC)

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:41:23 -0500

66 lines

Re: Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:59:07 -0500

29 lines

Re: Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC)

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:06:05 -0900

33 lines

Re: Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 11:59:43 -0600

14 lines

Re: Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC)

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:56:18 -0800

25 lines

Re: Early keyboard, secundum St. Met (NYC)

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 00:39:06 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

Early Music America magazine

Early Music America magazine

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 20:39:16 -0600

15 lines

Re: Early Music America magazine

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 20:54:31 -0600

18 lines

Re: Early Music America magazine

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 21:31:30 -0600

35 lines

Re: Early Music America magazine

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 22:50:49 -0500

27 lines

Re: Early Music America magazine

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 22:36:57 -0600

13 lines

Re: Early Music America magazine

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 19:24:00 -0800

25 lines

New Thread

ebay Chinese**

ebay Chinese**

Randall Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:56:21 +0000

38 lines

Re: ebay Chinese**

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 06:40:29 +1100

52 lines

Re: ebay Chinese**

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 02:25:03 -0500

26 lines

New Thread

ebay item

ebay item

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 14:01:31 -0500

20 lines

Re: ebay item

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 16:13:48 -0600

26 lines

ebay item

Victor Lee <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:50:39 +0800

39 lines

Re: ebay item

Colin Whiteley <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:02:00 GMT

37 lines

New Thread

ebay items (was ebay item)

ebay items (was ebay item)

Lee Davis <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 17:13:24 -0600

21 lines

Re: ebay items (was ebay item)

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 18:51:42 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

editions

Re: editions

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 00:45:58 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

Efficient Use of Practice Time

Re: Efficient Use of Practice Time

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 12:11:08 -0500

29 lines

Re: Efficient Use of Practice Time

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 23:36:30 -0500

62 lines

Re: Efficient Use of Practice Time

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:20:29 +0100

26 lines

Re: Efficient Use of Practice Time

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:24:39 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

electronic hpschds

Re: electronic hpschds

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:43:20 -0800

25 lines

Re: electronic hpschds

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 21:17:10 EST

23 lines

Re: electronic hpschds

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 07:15:47 -0600

30 lines

Re: electronic hpschds

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 14:57:59 -0500

29 lines

Re: electronic hpschds

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 16:35:35 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

electronic hpschds*****

Re: electronic hpschds*****

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 20:24:22 EST

20 lines

Re: electronic hpschds*****

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 01:51:18 +0000

24 lines

Re: electronic hpschds*****

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 23:33:14 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

Email adres

Email adres

Johan Brouwer <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 01:27:02 +0000

12 lines

New Thread

English non-short octaves (was Muselar key lever ratios and tuning)

Re: English non-short octaves (was Muselar key lever ratios and tuning)

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 14:57:09 -0500

23 lines

New Thread

Ensemble intonation: Valotti

Ensemble intonation: Valotti

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 22:07:36 +0100

52 lines

New Thread

etymologies

etymologies

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:52:28 -0800

21 lines

Re: etymologies

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 07:57:17 +1100

27 lines

New Thread

FAKE EARLY INSTRUMENTS. An observation

Re: FAKE EARLY INSTRUMENTS. An observation

Hal L Haney <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:16:38 -0700

118 lines

Re: FAKE EARLY INSTRUMENTS. An observation

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 01:06:21 +0100

121 lines

New Thread

FePo "headway"

Re: FePo "headway"

James <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:24:49 -0800

14 lines

New Thread

fingerings was Re: Bach toccatas--editions

Re: fingerings was Re: Bach toccatas--editions

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:16:38 -0000

18 lines

New Thread

For your information, should you be in the viewing area

For your information, should you be in the viewing area

Igor Kipnis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 22:22:38 -0400

47 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 00:37:33 -0500

62 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 08:25:03 +0100

26 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

Igor Kipnis <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 10:07:40 -0400

38 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 11:43:56 -0500

29 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:00:27 -0500

47 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 13:55:09 EST

17 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 21:32:06 EST

42 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 15:47:51 +0100

49 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 10:51:00 -0500

25 lines

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 16:24:05 -0500

17 lines

New Thread

For your information, should you be in the viewing area****

Re: For your information, should you be in the viewing area****

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 20:38:02 EST

31 lines

New Thread

Foreign tongues

Foreign tongues

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 09:01:08 +0100

29 lines

Re: Foreign tongues

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 10:08:39 +0000

46 lines

New Thread

fortepianos

fortepianos

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:25:05 -0800

43 lines

New Thread

Fourth try, for Margaret

Fourth try, for Margaret

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 18:28:45 +0100

59 lines

Fourth try, for Margaret

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:21:18 +0100

61 lines

New Thread

Fretted clav., was Re: KdF; was NYTimes pffft

Fretted clav., was Re: KdF; was NYTimes pffft

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:27:54 -0500

61 lines

New Thread

fretting conflicts in clavichords

fretting conflicts in clavichords

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:55:03 -0500

28 lines

Re: fretting conflicts in clavichords

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:57:25 -0900

44 lines

Re: fretting conflicts in clavichords

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:33:42 -0500

20 lines

New Thread

Froberger discography

Re: Froberger discography

Michael Zapf <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:22:15 EST

25 lines

Re: Froberger discography

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:31:30 EST

21 lines

Re: Froberger discography

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 08:43:54 +1100

31 lines

Re: Froberger discography

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:13:12 -0600

35 lines

New Thread

Froberger discography (long)

Froberger discography (long)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 11:03:55 -0600

132 lines

Re: Froberger discography (long)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 12:23:02 -0600

53 lines

New Thread

Froberger discography - major omission!

Froberger discography - major omission!

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 17:34:11 -0600

25 lines

Re: Froberger discography - major omission!

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 08:52:55 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

Froberger discography, Couchet, Drummont

Re: Froberger discography, Couchet, Drummont

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:13:05 -0800

36 lines

New Thread

Fuguesday

Fuguesday

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 11:15:52 -0500

44 lines

Re: Fuguesday

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 10:21:09 +0000

59 lines

Re: Fuguesday

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 09:19:54 -0600

30 lines

Re: Fuguesday

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 16:58:43 +0000

53 lines

Re: Fuguesday

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 12:41:47 -0500

28 lines

Re: Fuguesday

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 22:30:18 +0100

25 lines

Re: Fuguesday

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:22:54 +0100

27 lines

Re: Fuguesday

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 03:48:04 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

Fuguesday*****

Re: Fuguesday*****

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 06:39:33 EST

20 lines

New Thread

Fuguesday******

Re: Fuguesday******

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 20:27:08 EST

29 lines

Re: Fuguesday******

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 07:40:34 -0300

18 lines

Re: Fuguesday******

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:47:55 +0000

34 lines

Re: Fuguesday******

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 01:57:37 +1100

24 lines

Re: Fuguesday******

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 14:32:17 -0500

28 lines

New Thread

Fuguesday, and pianaphilia

Re: Fuguesday, and pianaphilia

Michael Smith <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 09:46:23 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

Fw: rescue Bach-autographs

Fw: rescue Bach-autographs

Chris Cartwright <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 23:58:40 +0100

34 lines

New Thread

Fwd: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this...

Fwd: *****[Fwd: Serial music, espionage, and politics - you MUST look at this...

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 21:34:58 EST

73 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Harpsichord Shop in Dunedin.

Fwd: Harpsichord Shop in Dunedin.

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 06:49:42 EST

87 lines

Re: Fwd: Harpsichord Shop in Dunedin.

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 16:35:33 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Fwd: Second attempt to send

Fwd: Second attempt to send

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 07:21:45 EST

219 lines

Re: Fwd: Second attempt to send

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 09:19:13 -0500

40 lines

New Thread

G major fugue BWV 577 for organ

Re: G major fugue BWV 577 for organ

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 21:46:25 -0300

18 lines

Re: G major fugue BWV 577 for organ

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 07:05:54 -0600

36 lines

New Thread

Gale force winds: explanation

Gale force winds: explanation

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:11:53 EST

218 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:53:06 -0600

16 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 20:50:20 EST

25 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

Timothy S Hall <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:25:28 -0500

31 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:52:08 EST

21 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:41:08 -0600

11 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 05:43:44 +0000

52 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:17:50 +0100

36 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:43:23 -0500

18 lines

Re: Gale force winds: explanation

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 20:54:03 -0600

30 lines

New Thread

Gale force winds: explanation -shamefully of list

Re: Gale force winds: explanation -shamefully of list

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 17:31:17 -0300

15 lines

New Thread

gals

Re: gals

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 16:15:26 +0100

53 lines

Re: gals

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 21 Feb 2000 20:17:24 -0500

30 lines

New Thread

General apology

General apology

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 10:48:03 +0100

100 lines

Re: General apology

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 23:41:22 +0100

40 lines

New Thread

good grief

Re: good grief

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:06:48 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

GOOD GRIEF--ALL READ!

GOOD GRIEF--ALL READ!

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 22:22:52 -0600

69 lines

New Thread

Good Home Required...

Good Home Required...

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 01:46:21 -0000

36 lines

Re: Good Home Required...

Harris Ruben <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 21:42:23 -0500

19 lines

New Thread

Hannibal Lecter...

Re: Hannibal Lecter...

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 12:21:51 -0800

21 lines

Re: Hannibal Lecter...

Linda DeGaeta <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 21:13:30 EST

13 lines

New Thread

Hannibal Lecter...********

Re: Hannibal Lecter...********

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 07:25:53 EST

21 lines

Re: Hannibal Lecter...********

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 09:09:51 -0500

22 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 15:24:31 EST

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 07:41:49 +1100

60 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

Lee Ridgway <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 15:58:03 -0500

21 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 08:18:04 +1100

74 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

Kirk Mcelhearn <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 22:22:58 +0100

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

Paul G. Masser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 16:57:49 -0500

17 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 21:26:16 EST

40 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 20:43:13 -0600

14 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 07:21:32 -0600

26 lines

Re: Harpsichord awareness (was: NY bashing)

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 17:28:08 -0300

11 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord hurling

Re: Harpsichord hurling

Al Past <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:04:22 -0600

17 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:47:37 EST

18 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 21:10:22 -0900

34 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 07:10:16 +0100

18 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

david cates <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 23:48:10 -0800

36 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 03:03:52 -0500

16 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:40:18 +0100

25 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 07:20:30 -0900

30 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 11:02:04 -0800

75 lines

Re: Harpsichord hurling

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 01:04:52 +0100

24 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord hurling****

Re: Harpsichord hurling****

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 08:12:10 EST

19 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord in Harare

Re: Harpsichord in Harare

Carey Beebe <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 17:04:22 +1100

34 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord in Harare?

Harpsichord in Harare?

Hendrik Broekman [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 19:46:30 -0500

22 lines

Re: Harpsichord in Harare?

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 16:27:19 +1100

31 lines

Re: Harpsichord in Harare?

R. Dean Anderson <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 08:34:42 +0100

38 lines

Re: Harpsichord in Harare?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:46:43 EST

29 lines

Re: Harpsichord in Harare?

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:52:31 EST

19 lines

Re: Harpsichord in Harare?

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 15:40:40 -0800

24 lines

New Thread

Harpsichord society in San Diego ?

Harpsichord society in San Diego ?

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:54:02 -0800

17 lines

Re: Harpsichord society in San Diego ?

Igor Kipnis <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 16:14:03 -0400

45 lines

Re: Harpsichord society in San Diego ?

Laurent Planchon <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 16:23:15 -0800

17 lines

New Thread

harpsichord sounds on computer sound cards

harpsichord sounds on computer sound cards

John Sankey <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 9 Feb 2000 00:13:52 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

Hawley patent steel wire making 1840

Hawley patent steel wire making 1840

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:37:38 EST

43 lines

New Thread

Haydn

Re: Haydn

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 12:28:10 -0800

23 lines

Re: Haydn

[log in to unmask]

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 16:49:36 EST

37 lines

Re: Haydn

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 01:58:13 +0100

49 lines

Re: Haydn

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 06:10:30 -0500

50 lines

Re: Haydn

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:44:42 +0100

23 lines

Re: Haydn

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 01:42:19 EST

34 lines

Re: Haydn

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 09:39:16 -0600

12 lines

Re: Haydn

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 00:50:28 +0000

75 lines

Re: Haydn

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:14:19 EST

26 lines

Re: Haydn

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 02:31:12 +0000

22 lines

Re: Haydn

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 21:25:31 EST

25 lines

Re: Haydn

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 10:41:55 +0100

98 lines

Re: Haydn

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 13:27:11 -0500

39 lines

New Thread

Haydn (was Curtis)

Haydn (was Curtis)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 00:39:29 EST

37 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 00:52:43 -0500

21 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 13 Feb 2000 14:19:26 -0500

24 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 06:26:11 +0100

38 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 16:31:39 +0100

37 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 10:41:50 EST

46 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 11:32:15 -0500

29 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 13:16:25 -0600

14 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 14:25:51 EST

38 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 00:49:06 +0100

24 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 16:50:17 +0100

26 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 19:12:40 +0100

31 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 11:54:51 -0300

25 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

what's my name? <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:31:14 +0000

43 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 15:20:07 -0300

20 lines

Re: Haydn (was Curtis)

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 20 Feb 2000 16:37:18 +0100

28 lines

New Thread

Henle editions (Was: JSB eds)

Henle editions (Was: JSB eds)

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:55:40 EST

40 lines

New Thread

HIP Kanon

HIP Kanon

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 14:07:02 -0800

30 lines

Re: HIP Kanon

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 22:34:38 -0300

14 lines

New Thread

HIP opera

Re: HIP opera

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 10:31:26 -0800

22 lines

Re: HIP opera

Anne Beetem <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 14:23:59 -0500

35 lines

Re: HIP opera

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 01:09:07 +0100

57 lines

Re: HIP opera

Philip Bayles <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:38:18 -0800

38 lines

Re: HIP opera

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:40:52 -0800

35 lines

Re: HIP opera

James Bunch <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 09:59:01 -0800

12 lines

New Thread

historical iron and steel music wire

historical iron and steel music wire

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:30:24 EST

183 lines

New Thread

history, as in "we know"

Re: history, as in "we know"

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 10:05:10 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

Houston Grand Opera

Re: Houston Grand Opera

ray ahrens <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 18:30:49 PST

16 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 22:23:03 -0600

36 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

Randall Taylor <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 23:26:09 +0000

22 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 09:54:19 -0600

43 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 12:18:12 -0500

25 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 16:02:37 -0500

21 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:44:15 -0600

53 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:56:55 -0500

49 lines

Re: Houston Grand Opera

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:26:02 +0100

18 lines

New Thread

How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:27:05 -0500

34 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

[log in to unmask]

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:56:54 EST

37 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 22:19:18 -0500

79 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 03:43:23 +0000

34 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 20:48:47 -0900

52 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:03:04 -0900

18 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 21:05:39 -0900

43 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Andrew Lagerquist <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 01:29:20 EST

16 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 16:31:54 +0100

27 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:52:20 -0600

15 lines

Re: How much is Vallotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:34:26 -0900

25 lines

New Thread

How much is Valotti used?

Re: How much is Valotti used?

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:32:48 +0100

29 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used?

Robin and Annabel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 19:21:26 +0000

26 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used?

Peter Bavington <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:07:01 -0500

18 lines

New Thread

How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:18:19 -0500

19 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 16:16:05 -0900

37 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 08:14:40 +0100

23 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Jan Kalsbeek <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 08:47:24 +0100

31 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 13:02:19 +0100

23 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 09:55:22 -0500

38 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 07:14:15 -0900

34 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:29:01 +0000

77 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 17:01:36 +0100

28 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 01:43:56 +0100

69 lines

Re: How much is Valotti used? (Temperament article at EMA site)

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 1 Mar 2000 02:58:35 +0000

69 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 12 Feb 2000 to 13 Feb 2000 (#2000-48)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 12 Feb 2000 to 13 Feb 2000 (#2000-48)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 08:39:43 -0800

28 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 12 Feb 2000 to 13 Feb 2000 (#2000-48)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 08:45:20 -0800

35 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 15 Feb 2000 to 16 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-53)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 15 Feb 2000 to 16 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-53)

David Schulenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 01:06:21 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 12:44:20 -0800

46 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-57)

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 10:47:54 EST

43 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-57)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-57)

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 07:31:22 -0600

46 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 17 Feb 2000 to 18 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-57)

david pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 14:18:15 +0000

30 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 18 Feb 2000 to 19 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-59)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 18 Feb 2000 to 19 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-59)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 19 Feb 2000 18:16:07 -0800

18 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-65)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-65)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:56:35 -0800

40 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-65)

Paula Woods <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:14:29 -0000

21 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-65)

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:48:57 -0500

18 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-65)

Nick Bunning <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 22:08:59 -0500

29 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 22 Feb 2000 (#2000-65)

Chris Cartwright <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 12:03:02 +0100

20 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 23 Feb 2000 to 24 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-68)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 23 Feb 2000 to 24 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-68)

Bruce Behnke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 16:45:39 -0800

18 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 23 Feb 2000 to 24 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-68)

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 14:17:46 -0500

32 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 24 Feb 2000 (#2000-69)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 24 Feb 2000 (#2000-69)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 10:13:16 -0800

21 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 24 Feb 2000 (#2000-69)

martin pühringer <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 14:05:54 +0100

29 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 24 Feb 2000 to 25 Feb 2000 (#2000-70)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 24 Feb 2000 to 25 Feb 2000 (#2000-70)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 13:45:39 -0800

46 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 25 Feb 2000 to 26 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-71)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 25 Feb 2000 to 26 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-71)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:25:06 -0800

33 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 Feb 2000 to 27 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-73)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 26 Feb 2000 to 27 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-73)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 28 Feb 2000 11:54:25 -0800

31 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Jan 2000 to 30 Jan 2000 (#2000-29)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 29 Jan 2000 to 30 Jan 2000 (#2000-29)

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 09:44:22 +0100

22 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Jan 2000 to 31 Jan 2000 (#2000-30)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Jan 2000 to 31 Jan 2000 (#2000-30)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 08:33:32 -0800

20 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Jan 2000 to 31 Jan 2000 (#2000-30)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 08:35:10 -0800

22 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 30 Jan 2000 to 31 Jan 2000 (#2000-30)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 1 Feb 2000 08:52:15 -0800

32 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 31 Jan 2000 to 1 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-31)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 31 Jan 2000 to 1 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-31)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:08:56 -0800

28 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-40)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 - Special issue (#2000-40)

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:14:44 -0800

50 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-40)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 5 Feb 2000 to 6 Feb 2000 - Special issue(#2000-40)

Ibo Ortgies <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 09:51:12 +0100

41 lines

New Thread

HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Feb 2000 to 9 Feb 2000 (#2000-44)

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Feb 2000 to 9 Feb 2000 (#2000-44)

Rob Utterback <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 00:54:22 -0500

18 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Feb 2000 to 9 Feb 2000 (#2000-44)

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 10:03:33 +0000

32 lines

Re: HPSCHD-L Digest - 8 Feb 2000 to 9 Feb 2000 (#2000-44)

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 06:43:42 EST

29 lines

New Thread

If you are near Dallas, Stamford (Connecticut),San Diego, or Los Angeles

If you are near Dallas, Stamford (Connecticut),San Diego, or Los Angeles

Igor Kipnis <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 12 Feb 2000 16:24:09 -0400

71 lines

New Thread

interesting CDs and reviews

interesting CDs and reviews

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 29 Feb 2000 16:08:56 -0500

13 lines

New Thread

Irving Berlin's transposing piano

Irving Berlin's transposing piano

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 12:43:07 -0500

34 lines

New Thread

ivory

ivory

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:48:42 -0500

24 lines

Re: ivory

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:10:14 EST

27 lines

Re: ivory

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:16:28 +0100

41 lines

Re: ivory

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 07:24:36 EST

32 lines

Re: ivory

David Jensen <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:41:59 -0500

37 lines

Re: ivory

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 08:05:31 -0600

25 lines

Re: ivory

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 09:00:53 -0800

24 lines

Re: ivory

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:22:05 -0500

24 lines

Re: ivory

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 12:52:15 -0500

20 lines

Re: ivory

Delwin D Fandrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 10:00:27 -0800

38 lines

Re: ivory

PAUL G. MASSER <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:43:20 -0500

23 lines

Re: ivory

Delwin D Fandrich <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 11:42:16 -0800

43 lines

Re: ivory

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 21:18:48 EST

22 lines

Re: ivory

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 24 Feb 2000 10:47:40 -0500

27 lines

New Thread

ivory and the Wittmayer

Re: ivory and the Wittmayer

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 15:22:00 -0300

20 lines

New Thread

JC Bach's Zumpe

JC Bach's Zumpe

William Vine <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 25 Mar 2000 20:50:38 -0000

46 lines

New Thread

jefferson

jefferson

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 12:43:51 -0500

36 lines

Re: jefferson

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 14 Feb 2000 15:07:32 -0500

19 lines

Re: jefferson

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 11:46:17 -0500

26 lines

Re: jefferson

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 16 Feb 2000 23:32:02 -0500

20 lines

Re: jefferson

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 07:34:37 EST

31 lines

Re: jefferson

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 09:28:09 -0500

36 lines

Re: jefferson

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 12:03:37 -0500

50 lines

Re: jefferson

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 13:52:39 -0500

33 lines

Re: jefferson

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 16:10:30 -0500

40 lines

Re: jefferson

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 14:48:32 -0900

49 lines

Re: jefferson

James <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 15:47:24 -0800

16 lines

Re: jefferson

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 02:07:53 +0000

41 lines

Re: jefferson

[log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 13:00:12 -0500

49 lines

New Thread

jefferson (fwd)

Re: jefferson (fwd)

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 15 Feb 2000 14:19:37 -0500

29 lines

New Thread

jefferson**

Re: jefferson**

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:36:26 EST

20 lines

Re: jefferson**

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 21:27:24 -0500

34 lines

Re: jefferson**

kjacob <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 22:29:47 -0500

51 lines

Re: jefferson**

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 11:22:52 +0100

24 lines

Re: jefferson**

Paul G. Masser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 09:28:28 -0500

26 lines

Re: jefferson**

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 21:11:37 EST

19 lines

New Thread

jefferson*****

Re: jefferson*****

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 22:00:32 EST

23 lines

Re: jefferson*****

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 23 Feb 2000 20:58:36 -0600

28 lines

New Thread

jefferson******

Re: jefferson******

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 17 Feb 2000 20:25:01 EST

20 lines

Re: jefferson******

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 15:14:47 +1100

26 lines

Re: jefferson******

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 03:01:54 -0500

35 lines

Re: jefferson******

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 03:05:16 -0500

15 lines

Re: jefferson******

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 03:55:16 -0500

24 lines

Re: jefferson******

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 18 Feb 2000 03:58:29 -0500

25 lines

New Thread

JSB toccata editions

JSB toccata editions

David Kelzenberg <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 17:42:27 -0600

56 lines

Re: JSB toccata editions

[log in to unmask]

Tue, 22 Feb 2000 23:18:32 EST

22 lines

New Thread

KdF

Re: KdF

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:34:21 -0300

14 lines

Re: KdF

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 19:56:30 -0300

29 lines

Re: KdF

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 15:05:24 -0500

32 lines

Re: KdF

[log in to unmask]

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 20:50:54 EST

19 lines

Re: KdF

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 10:20:54 +0000

48 lines

Re: KdF

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 11:50:26 +0100

20 lines

Re: KdF

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 12:18:10 +0000

38 lines

Re: KdF

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 19:09:35 +0100

47 lines

Re: KdF

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:35:38 -0500

45 lines

Re: KdF

William Jurgenson <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 07:20:39 +0100

30 lines

Re: KdF

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:04:06 +0100

24 lines

Re: KdF

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 09:56:18 +0000

67 lines

Re: KdF

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 10:07:39 +0000

63 lines

Re: KdF

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 08:08:17 EST

25 lines

Re: KdF

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 09:43:56 -0500

33 lines

Re: KdF

Robert Feeser <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 21:59:37 -0500

38 lines

Re: KdF

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 20:06:43 -0600

19 lines

Re: KdF

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 5 Feb 2000 20:23:01 -0600

32 lines

Re: KdF

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 00:56:57 -0300

31 lines

Re: KdF

david pickett <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 08:17:14 +0000

28 lines

Re: KdF

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 10:19:25 -0900

31 lines

Re: KdF

John Howell <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 18:28:21 -0500

32 lines

Re: KdF

Zachary Uram <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 20:15:46 -0500

49 lines

Re: KdF

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 20:00:27 -0600

22 lines

Re: KdF

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 6 Feb 2000 21:15:00 -0300

17 lines

Re: KdF

Roger Clarke <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:09:27 +0000

35 lines

Re: KdF

Joseph <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:21:30 -0800

29 lines

Re: KdF

David Calhoun <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:43:11 -0800

20 lines

Re: KdF

James McCarty <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 21:02:03 -0600

37 lines

Re: KdF

JoAnn Udovich <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 22:50:46 -0500

40 lines

Re: KdF

Ellsworth <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 09:34:52 -0600

13 lines

Re: KdF

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 13:15:04 -0300

17 lines

Re: KdF

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 11:52:38 EST

45 lines

Re: KdF

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Tue, 8 Feb 2000 19:35:48 +0100

46 lines

Re: KdF

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 10 Feb 2000 11:34:39 EST

29 lines

Re: KdF

Dale C. Carr <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 11 Feb 2000 09:00:18 +0100

30 lines

Re: KdF

Stephen Birkett <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 12:52:17 EST

47 lines

Re: KdF

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 18:21:36 +0000

43 lines

Re: KdF

[log in to unmask]

Fri, 25 Feb 2000 22:02:40 EST

25 lines

Re: KdF

David B. Klein <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 00:02:18 -0500

32 lines

Re: KdF

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 05:34:51 +0000

37 lines

Re: KdF

[log in to unmask]

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 07:20:37 EST

22 lines

Re: KdF

J M R <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 20:12:05 +0100

24 lines

Re: KdF

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Sat, 26 Feb 2000 17:07:54 -0300

11 lines

Re: KdF

Billy Kitson <[log in to unmask]>

Sun, 27 Feb 2000 08:39:28 +1100

19 lines

New Thread

KdF *****

KdF *****

Peter Redstone <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 08:10:24 -0500

24 lines

Re: KdF *****

<Luis Villalba> <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 13:34:30 -0300

14 lines

New Thread

KdF ... and NYT revisited

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 18:52:29 -0500

43 lines

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

Owen J. Daly <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 17:53:40 -0900

55 lines

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Wed, 2 Feb 2000 23:48:17 -0500

29 lines

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

Paul Poletti <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 09:46:27 +0100

22 lines

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

Collins, Gordon A. <[log in to unmask]>

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 16:59:11 -0500

42 lines

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

[log in to unmask]

Thu, 3 Feb 2000 20:37:50 EST

28 lines

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

Rodney Myrvaagnes <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 00:29:02 -0500

24 lines

Re: KdF ... and NYT revisited

Judith Conrad <[log in to unmask]>

Fri, 4 Feb 2000 18:49:21 -0500

101 lines

New Thread

KdF on fretted clavichord

KdF on fretted clavichord

Bradley Lehman <[log in to unmask]>

Mon, 7 Feb 2000 10:56:55 -0500

82 lines

Re: KdF on fretted clavichord

Stuart Frankel <[log in to unmask]>